ML20126J230
| ML20126J230 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 05/30/1985 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126J211 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8506180564 | |
| Download: ML20126J230 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
na ue o
UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
-l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20556
\\,...../
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 64 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-70 AND AMENDMENT N0. 36 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. OPR-75 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY PHILADELPHIA ELtLIRIC CUMPANY DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, AND ATLANTIC CITY ELEGINIC COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATION STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 s
DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 Introduction On February 8,1985, Public Service Electric and Gas Company submitted an amendment request to correct errors in the Technical Specifications issued in Amendment Nos. 59 and 28 for Salem Units 1 and 2, respectively. The corrections were predominantly typographical errors; several were editorial or clarifying in nature; finally, some material added by recent amendments had been inadvertently replaced by out-dated wording in the two year old license change which initiated Amendment Nos. 59 and 28.
Evaluation and Sun.ary The staff has reviewed all of the administrative errors and specification clarifications and concluded that they provide the necessary language to correct the specifications issued in Amendment Nos. 59 and 28. The staff s
N further verified that the new wording did not remove or relax any existing requirement r.eeded to provide reasonable assurance that.the health and safety of the public would not be endangered by the plants' operation; hence the changes are acceptable.
Environmental Consideration These amendments involve e change in the installation or use of the facilities components located within the restricted areas as defined in 10 CFR 20. The staff has determined that these amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released cffsite and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that these amendments involve no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, these amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Sec 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
I ay 4\\
o l'
-2 Conclusion We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Dated: May 30, 1985 Principal Contributors:
W. Meinke F. Congel C. Willis D. Fischer i
e l
l
.