ML20126H337

Requests Revision to Upgrade Rule Physical Protection Plan Submitted 800919.NRC Comments from 801030-31 Site Visit & Consolidated Listing of Comments Re App I Encl.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)

ML20126H337
Person / Time
Site:	07000025
Issue date:	12/08/1980
From:	Mccorkle G NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Remley M EMVROCIE, ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8104090366
Download: ML20126H337 (2)

Text

.. _ _ - -

n .

1110 SGPL:0FS 70-25 Rockwell Interr$tional Corporation Energy Systces Group ATTH: Dr. M. E. Remley, Manager Health, Safety, & Radiation S2rvices 8900 DeSoto Avenue Canoga Park, California 91304 Gentlenen:

We have completed the initial revira of the Upgrade Rule Physical Protection Plan for your Energy Systems Group's Canoga Park Facility, VMct, was trans-mitted by your letter of September 19, 1980.

Connents by the HRC staff concernirg Parts One end Two of the Plan were discusse<J with mothers of your stti? by Odell Smith of our Physical Security Licensing Franch and M. D. Schuste; end Dennis Schaefer, Safeguards Branch of the PRC's P.egien V, during their visit to your facility on October 30 and 31, 1980. tdcabers of the NRC's Lkcrsing and Inspection and Enforcement staffs further c(rmnted upon thw two parts of the Plan with your Dr. M. E.

Remley during his visit at our SiMr Spring, "aryland office en Hovember 18-l 20, 1980. Those cerants and the rer.ults of the varicus discussions are l contained in Enclosure "A" of thic btter.

A consolidatt.d If sting of convoh ,y the INC staf f relative to Apr>endix I (Infornation Request Sheets - IRS') of the Plan was not available at tra time of the October 30-31 discussites. That listing has new been compiled and is contained in Enclosure "P r .' this letter.

Of the 45 items discussed during "' > October 30-31 rectirio, ten ware unrosolved, pending further evalu tion and coordination on the part of both l

the URC Staff end E5G. Some of tf me ten items refer to duplicate issues.

l Accordingly, there were approxirrately seven matters which wore not resolved et that time. We have continued a dialogue between the NRC licensing staff and Dr. Remley; and expect to cend.:t vthatever further meetings, or discussions which may be necessary in order to !esolve these notters in a tinely fashion.

i orrect ), , , ,

sunr.AMtk.. .-!. .j. , . , , ,

j b nm p Y10i'090$ff f

l 7 7 l 1 _ .. - . c .:r - - - -

2.; ; - .

=;; 1

... o

}W.

.k l

ife would appreciate your inmediate attention to revising the Plan, as agreed upon during the October 30-31 and November 18-20 discussions (and as contained in Enclosure "A" of *.his letter); to the identified unrc- Q r 5;;

solved matters;~ and to the admint erative/ procedural phanges to the f.j p y IRS's, as recomended in Enclosure "B" of this letter. O We have determined that the Physical Protection Plan transmitted by your letter of Septerrher 19, 1980 and Enr.losures A and B to this letter contain Infont.ation of a type specified in 10 CFR 2.790(d). Accordingly, they are deemed to be comorcial or financ!tl infomation within the noening of  !

10CFR9,5(a)(4)andshallbesubjecttodisclosureonlyin'accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 9.12.

d vm I.'i /

Sincerely, p ..j !

.. y . , -

. o r:r' Ccore W. McCorkle, Chief Physical Security Licensing Branch i Divi;1on of Safeguards, fM3S TI 9 t(jim Enc 1osurcs: 9...

7*

As stated i DISTRIBUTION:(w/oencl)

~~

NMS'S r/ f SGPL r/f LCRouse [.3pj$

DMeiss s k.

RLFonner M@

JGuibert RGPage SGML DISTRIBUTION:(w/enci)

Case File Docket i LLBush OFSmith s

v(. Region V QV l (d o< D RRRentschler y

py.fy p' n; .

f i

. i -.

gh ([

or r ice.)

SGP / ,, ,

pGPLgq ,

.SGPJ,' gy- ,

0FSm ;An.- TERRen chie.t. .cero. tion .

suuNm)!12/04 c m >j. . . . . . . . .

ao12/vf. 80 1P/6 /80 EIr'onM3s (9 n> r,nce or4o W u.s. cot Mr muNTING ()rFICf g 1979-289-309 I[

,. < .s.ev n~m mg

Nwn~cy;s!.i ,3 pg ' qm, ew..a ' m.. , , - g. .- .

. n*o%g.g mmm u vy %,r.c4 g. Q. g.f lgp & %+ H

- - - -, -. .- .