ML20126C551

Forwards Clipping Protesting Facility Operation.Incalculable Risk of Nuclear Power Is Not Fair Exchange for Human Life

ML20126C551
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	02/28/1980
From:	Bowman J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8004040155
Download: ML20126C551 (2)

Text

.-

t 3

U** 'M~ MN dW.

[Qc kET NUMBER M

DOC

\\

\\

i AM

&_V M

~ Mt I

%%w c"> n.

ww

-a C

s m

hag6M

=

e 1

pe a-i 00CKETED USNRO 1

i

]

WAR 151980>

D~M '

\\

g

~

cm..isswer 3 N

m a senice D

h&

N.g s

l e

e e

om m

9 9 -Q"

^

J o aJu o Ju.1 A 8004040155

I i

l i

t f

. p g *.r y..q;. p r*st'.*"f C 'W: W ! >" Q 1*V

• 'M *'AQ'K 3* M' u

,.9

.n

...u r-3.

2 ww-3

.N 1 "Our victory is; incomplete"

+

t.

,. 3. _

i o-..

,1,.

Deer Mr. Witteette.

NC ' ovacuatlert on Long Island is impossible, i

The defeat of the Jamesport nuclear plant, The N.Y State Master Energy Plan new must be credited to the impressive vertefy of- imposes a 15 year moratorium on' att ad-

.',leglIndividuals, organizations and town and -

j county atticials ' who expreened i the# ope ' k, ; escepting shoreham. ditionet nuclear plants in

'j

.;s Yes, shorehem is the 7 7;ce,j penitten d6rectly to the state Siting seerd la ^

' W, whees hands 1ha declaion ley. The active and

• enly and the last nuclear piant scheduled for {

licensing'la N.Y. State, We emphatically

< f breed unity of our people was unprecedented ' f reiect the' fate of being offered as the final

' and is eloquent testimony to the power of the sacrifice to en old, reckless and abandoned people in overcoming great odds in defense of i J era.

,4

' ;g 7tnoir vital interests. ~

, Sofore LILCO receives its ta totui license to However, we recognise that our victory le,, fire up nuclear Shoreham a final hearing ort '

H. 'locomplete. The nuclear threat at Shorenom its safety will take place before the. Nuclear remains to be faced and 1ought..The scant IS Regulatory Commission later this year, At miles separating shoreham from Jamespert '

that time our county and citizen intervenors - ~

• will prove illusery in protecting those of us (

who would be trapped on the East End, will be heard. The NRC will then decide yes

+

A nuclear Jamesport would have been the or no. But let us not wait, as in the Jamesport

. most technologically advanced.

yet, we case, for a last. minute penic call for a - }

l N,,,eg<lustly " teared people's letter campaign to save the day. Lee'* f L

[G[k' '* Shoreham is attsady it. In contrast, nuclear,

" we Instead launch a continuous avalanche of. :

a monument of lettert from Individuals, orpenizations and J

(

.k.

, w'd'.".

, technoiogical obsolescence, designed ever 30 '

years agow We who opposed the new one as town and county atticials direcify ~ 90 the %

' Nuclear Regulatory Commiesten espressing C dangerous must,suret( see the greater /. "sur feelings and encouraging dialogue. < + - 1[

denser in sammete morehem. -

vn.she.edress ist nwer.ac.R.guietory.

3

,I,m;The Prealdent's.Jmperf6tt Kemeny Com-

, Commkolen, Washington. D.C. 20M5.

e o

iesten hos declared, and the independent The power t ef thet tedged people that

{comemputthatNRC ftegestpCommissian has this past week defeated necesor %magert,. can defeat ~

The essey of nuclear plants cannot be nuclear shoreham. Jet *ve complete our a

insured; Nuclear plants are inherently victory and conaldee alternettves to safely l dangerous: They should not be operatec near meetour M.

l. a' '

j i

4 e populetten centers; They should not be

• i A operated withou Prod Adler I

m.n.t workable emergency Pres 4 dent, N.O.N.E.

t -,y

.m.,e...y e-- N-N'-

~

J l

l l

i l

i I

l

?

I I

I I

1 1

I l

i

-,