ML20125E003

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Advises That Proprietary Rept WCAP-13532, Sequoyah Units 1 & 2 W* Tube Plugging Criteria for SG Tubesheet Region of Wextex Expansions Submitted w/921118 Ltr Will Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790),per Request
ML20125E003
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  
Issue date: 12/09/1992
From: Labarge D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Liparulo N
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
References
TAC-M84959, NUDOCS 9212160135
Download: ML20125E003 (3)


Text

-

I Q MQQ T

o UNITED STATES

~,,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

{

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

/

December 9, 1992

+...+

Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 Mr. N. J. Liparulo, Manager Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Activities Westinghouse Electric Corporation P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230-0355

Dear Mr. Liparulo:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE -

SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 (TAC NOS. M84959 AND M84960)

By letter dated November 18, 1992, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted Westinghouse document WCAP-13532, "Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 W* Tube Plugging Criteria For SG Tubesheet Region of Wextex Expansions" dated November 1992 as Proprietary Information, and affidavit CAW-92-376 dated November 17, 1992.

TVA requested that the information be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790.

Westinghouse stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:

(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use l

by any of Westinghouse *s competitors without license from Westinghouse l

constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.

l (b)

It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a i

process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.

(c)

Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.

l (d)

It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or l

customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.

,n

~

u=

- -~

' , }{

110010 i

r 9212160135 921209 PDR ADOCK 05000327 p

PDR g g

Mr. N. J. Liparulo We have reviewed the application and the material based on the requirements and criteria of 10 CFR 2.790 and, on the basis of Westinghouse's statements, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains trade secrets or proprietary commercial information.

Therefore, the version of the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents.

If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You should 1so understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, such as, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information.

In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

Sincerely, Original signed by 3

David E. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate II-4 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of _ Nuclear Reactor Regulation I

cc: See next page Distribution Docket File D. LaBarge NRC & Local PDRs M. Siemien, OGC SQN. Rdg.

B. Wilson, RII S. Varga 14-E-4 E. Merschoff, RII G. Lainas 14-H-3 F. Hebdon M. Sanders A

0FC:

PDII-4/LA PDII-4/PM N OGC PDII-4/D NAME:

MSandersht/

DlaBarge:as MSiemientdk FHebdonN DATE:

/d / 2)/92 P' / 3 /92 l O/9 /92 11./? /92

i t*

i'

{'i Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority ATTN: Dr. Mark 0. Medford i

cc:

Mr. John B. Waters, Chairman County Judge Tennessee Valley Authority Hamilton County Courthouse i

ET 12A Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 i

400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Regional Administrator.

U.S.N.R.C. Region II Mr. J. R.'Bynum, Vice President 101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Nuclear Operations Suite 2900 3B Lookout Place Atlanta, Georgia 30323 1101 Market Street j

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 i

Mr. William E. Holland Senior Resident inspector Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Mr. M. J. Burzynski, Manager U.S.N.R.C.

Nuclear Licensing and Regulatory Affairs 2600 Igou Ferry Road i

Tennessee Valley Authority Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 58 Lookout Place Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 e-Mr. Jack Wilson, Vice President l

Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 l

l TVA-Representative Tennessee Valley Authority 11921 Rockville Pike Suite 402.

Rockville, Maryland 20852

-Ms. Marci Cooper, Site Licensing Manager

-Sequoyah Nuclear P1 ant i

Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000

. Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 Mr. Michael H. Mobley, Director i

Division of. Radiological Health 3rd Floor,-L and C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, Tennessee'- 37243-1532 General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority i

ET 11H 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-

- -