ML20125C229

Ack Receipt of 921020 & 1103 Responses to NOV & Notice of Nonconformance from Insp Rept 99900080/92-01.Response Did Not Fully Meet Intent of 10CFR21

ML20125C229
Person / Time
Issue date:	11/30/1992
From:	Norrholm L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Robertson F COPES-VULCAN, INC.
References
REF-QA-99900080 NUDOCS 9212110102
Download: ML20125C229 (2)

Text

&

{

~

Mt:0 jL

.[

L*

UNITED STATES -

E~

'}

i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s

/

WASHIN(is oN, DM. 20666

!!0V 3 0193z Docket No. 9990080 Mr. F. R. Robertson, President Capes-Vulcan, Inc.

P. 0. Box 577 Lake City, Pennsylvania 16423-0577

Subject:

EVAlllATION AND CONCLUSIONS REGARDING JHE REPLIES TO THE NOTICE OF VIOL TION AND THE NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE (NRC INSPECTION REPORT N0. 99900080/92-01) g I am responding to Copes-Vulcan, Inc.'s (CV's) October 20, 1992, and iRvember 3, 1992, replies to the Notice of Violation and Notice of Nonconformance which

.were issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on September 30, 1992, following an NRC inspection of CV's facility. in Lake. City, Pennsylvania.

The Notice of Violation identified that CV's procedure requirements failed to comply with the requirements of-Part 21 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations (10 CFR Part 21), and the Notice of Nonconformance identified CV activities which failed to comply with the requirements of Appendix 8 to 10 CFR Part 50.

Your replies to the Notice of Nonconformance and corrective a: tion taken were-determined to be adequate for all Nonconformance; ident-f 'ed, however your reply to the-Violation did not fully meet the intent of. If ' R Part 21. Since the receir. of your November.3,- 1992, response to

-_the, ; ice' of Violation, Mr. L. L. Campbell of this office discussed with Mr.

J. R..Scarpelli of-CV the need to update CV Procedure No. 1-6.26,

" Identification, Evaluation,'and Notification Requirements Per 10 CFR Part 21," dated August 16, 1991, with Addendum, dated October 13,.1992, to g

clearly address all substantive revisions to 10 CFR Part 21 that became

-effective on October 29, 1991.

Your implementation of the changes to CV Procec'ure No. 1-6.26 as discussed above is considered satisfactory corrective

. action.

We will review the implementation of your. corrective actions and actions to prevent recurrence, as described in your replies to the Notice of

~Nonconformance and as discussed'in~this letter, during a future inspection to e7sure that full compliance to'10 CFR Parts 21 and 50 has been achieved and

' will-be maintained.

iln accordance with Section 2.790 of 10 CFR, " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, l y 9212110102:921130 PDR >GA999'ENVCOPES1

1. m / n O

/~

99900000 PDR.

/ ////I ~ v/ #~

.i-

} hhh

&gfg)[

f-L-

n a

m

- - - - - - - - - - - - ~

~

9,.Aw

~

jg Mrs F. R.-Robertsoni,-..

'i If you have any-questions concerning the inspection:and your reply.we will-be--

i 4

glad-to discuss then1with you..

Sincerely, f

Leif. Norrholm, Chief' l

Vendor! Inspection Branch-Division _of Reactor Inspection

-and Licensee Performance

- Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION:

-LCampbell

.VIB'R/F RZimmerman

= UPotapovs:

DRIS R/F

PDR_

LNorrholm ERossi ACentralqFiles/ Docket 1 Files / RIDS;IE,:097

• See previous concurrence

[FFICE 1VIB/DRIL:

VIB/DRIL

.VIB(O'RILf NAME LCampbell.l UPotapovs-LMm DATE- -

-11/25/92*-

11/25/92*

11/1 992 YES-YES YES-COPY NO

- 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY:

00C.-NAME: A: COPES-LT

~

[

0 L.

5

-f.

6' c

y y