ML20125C154

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Trip Rept of Attendance at Natl Congress of American Indians,Natl Indian Nuclear Waste Review Committee Meetings on 850424-25 in Minneapolis,Mn Re Tribes Affected by Nuclear Waste Policy Act
ML20125C154
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/23/1985
From: Russell C
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Bunting J
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
References
REF-WM-1 NUDOCS 8506110671
Download: ML20125C154 (20)
v • d • e


Text

WM Record file WM Prokct _._L...__

poF Docket flo.

DISTRIBUTION:

PDR _C-44hms/tw JGr= v:s LPDR NMSS:

r/f J0 Bunting Distribution:

PCA:

r/f MKnapp L

SL:

r/f HMiller

- _d PAltomare REBrowning TRIP REP 0kflWSSWLg,623.SS)

MKearney MJBell DMattson Originator MAY 2 3 E JSurmeier Porq LHigginbotham MEMORANDUM.FOR:

Joseph 0. Bunting, Chief Policy'and Program Control Branch FROM:

Catherine F. Russell, Project Manager State / Tribal Liaison

SUBJECT:

TRIP REPORT - NCAI MEETING ON APRIL 24-25, 1985 IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNES0TA At the request of the National Congress of American Indians, I attended their April 24-25, 1985 meeting cf the NCAI National Indian Nuclear Waste Review Committee in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

The purpose of the meeting was to reach those tribes which could be "potentially affected" under the NWPA for the DOE's second repository or crystalline program and to provide them.with information on the NWPA and the role of the various Federal agencies involved in implementing the NWPA.

I sat on the Federal panel with representatives from DOE Headquarters (Ben Easterling), DOE-Chicago Operations Office (Rich Schaussburger), and BIA (Sid Mills), and gave a general presentation on the NRC's role in implementing the NWPA and the opportunities for tribal participation.

A copy of the meeting agenda as well as the DOE's crystalline program information package are attached.

Ben Easterling, DOE, gave a general overview of the DOE's program for implementing the NWPA, and the status of various actions required by the NWPA such as the Mission Plan, MRS proposal, co-mingling decision and AM/FM panel recommendations.

Rich Schaussburger, DOE, spoke specifically about the status and future actions for their second repository or crystalline program. He said that DOE, with the assistance of BIA had initially identified 16 tribes which could be "potentially affected" under the NWPA for the second repository program.

The list only included those tribes which are Federally recognized and have off-Reservation treaty rights. Mr. Schaussburger indicated the list was "very preliminary" and could expand as they got further into the program.

At this point in the site selection, DOE has only done a " literature survey" of the crystalline rocks which might be suitable for further study for a possible repository site. Mr. Schaussburger emphasized that no field work had yet been done on any of the sites.

DOE plans to issue their final Region-to-Area Screening Methodology Document in May-June 1985 and plans to narrow down the number of sites under consideration in early 1986.

In response to a question, Mr. Schaussburger_said that DOE had given pre notification grants to 8506110671 850523 PDR WASTE WM-1 PDR OFC :WMPC

WMPC
WMPC

__b.."$$$

IS.

."..$$_".___ f "E..".0.__ _______...__ _________... ____________ __________.

DATE$85/05/23

l DISTRIBUTION:

WM: s/f JGrGeves i

NMSS:

r/f J0 Bunting

}.-

PCA:.r/f MKnapp i

SL:

r/f HMiller PAltomare REBrowning TRIP REPORTRUSSELL MKearney MJBell DMattson Originator JSurmeier LHigginbotham 1

'16 of the 17-states 'with' crystalline rock formations.

DOE had received 2 grant requests from tribes and turned both down because, to justify a grant the

. applicant must show that the actions or information obtained under the grant

{-

will be of benefit to DOE, and the tribes had not demonstrated this in their 4

grant requests.

Sid Mills, Director of. Trust Responsibility, BIA, discussed the need for BIA to

+

j assist "affected" and "potentially affected" tribes.in working with the various Federal agencies involved in implementing the NWPA.

He asked the tribes to provide a written letter'with suggestions as to what role the BIA should have 4

in the nuclear waste program.

One of the major questions asked of BIA by the tribes was whether BIA's Office of the Solicitor, as a part of its' trust i

responsibility, would litigate on behalf of the tribes in any' lawsuit filed by the tribes on the NWPA. Mills responded yes, but added that BIA had no money appropriated, but they would try:to find the dollars to protect the tribes if

[

" critical nuclear litigation issues" are identified by the tribes.

Allen

}!

Slickpoo, Nez Perce, said he thought the BiA would "back-off" if a tribe requested them to press litigation against another branch of the Federal Government. Mills:said that if a conflict exists, BIA makes every effort to l

j give the tribes l funding so that they could hire. adequate "outside" legal i

representation. l Jim Kleinhans, Director, Wisconsin Radioactive Waste Review Board,' pointed out that the: tribes must be prepared to represent themselves.

1

-Neither BIA or the State can be counted on the " carry their water".

They can provide assistance,-but the tribe must be prepared to take'the lead. A j

representative from the Coeur d'Alene Tribe said his tribe did take the lead and submitted a petition to BIA for "affected" status but were turned down.

j Based on information~obtained at this meeting, the tribe-is giving serious consideration-to appealing the original-BIA decision.

I j

Mike Curgan,' DOE Headquarters, discussed the current plans for a monitored i

retrievable storage facility and indicated that the three sites under i.

consideration would be announced the following day.

DOE's proposal for an f

integrated MRS facility, said Curgan, is based on two perceived benefits:

i reduced transportation of spent fuel and separation of functions'of waste acceptance and emplacement to smooth repository operation and to provide l'

temporary storage in the event the repository was not available or ran into loading trouble.. Curgan said DOE plans to formally submit a detailed MRS i

proposal to Congress in January 1986,'and that any actions would be contingent on Congressional approval of the MRS. Work with states / tribes affected by the i

l MRS will begin shortly after the three' sites are recommended. The next day, q

. DOE identified the three sites in Tennessee that.are being considered for the MRS facility.

j.

q I

0FC :WMPC

WMPC
WMPC NAME :CRussell:cp :DMattson
JOBun ng

-DATE :85/05/23

_ _... a,

a

.m

DISTRIBUTION:

WM: s/f JGr::v:s NMSS:

r/f J0 Bunting PCA:

r/f MKnapp SL:

r/f HMiller PAltomare REBrowning TRIP REPORTRUSSELL HKearney MJBell DMattson Originator JSurmeier LHigginbotham Gail Chehak, National Congress of American Indians, asked me to make the tribes aware of the NRC/ DOT meeting on transportation to be held in Chicago, Illinois on July.31-August 2.

I stressed that the focus of the meeting would be current transportation regulations / activities and not future transportation to a repository. A number of tribes identified some current radioactive waste transportation issues and expressed interest in tne meeting.

I took their names and forwarded them to Steve Saloman, OSP, and John Cook, FC, who are coordinating.the meeting.

NCAI also announced that the focus of their Mid-Year Conference, to take place on June 3-5, 1985 in Sparks, Nevada, would be transportation.

/s/

Catherine F. Russell, Project Manager State / Tribal Liaison

Enclosures:

As Stated I

0FC :WMPC

WMPC
h

____.....g.,{......__

NAME :CRussell:cp :DMattson

J0 Bun ng

( pk.__...... ____.........__..... _________.__..._______._..........

DATE$85/05/23 d$

i

t l.. -

~

l i

NATIONAL CONGRESS '0F AMERICAN INDIANS n,,

NUCLEAR WASTE MATIONAL INDIAN REVIEW ColetITTEE Lenington Hotel

]

execuma penscroa 1014-3rd Avenue, South

. soua sa.-a Harm Minneapolis, Minnesota ca.,.neea ca execuma comairras passeosur 4

s o.t.crun ousn.ust N.00n E."./uT'""'"'

Wednesday, April 24, 1985 j

3 ro.acae.noorca.

oi.a.x ineesenstaav-necono ca.r

. ton,.a.m*

8:30 Continental Breakfast (Suggested donation S3.00);

j y,asa Registration caer.nne m r sous j

ansa vies,mse.oents 9:00 "Welcome Address" j

assnessN aAsa l

' Ya,Ns, Co-Chairs: Roger Jourdain, Chair, Red Lake Chippewa c

l Lloyd Powless, Member, Oneida Executive atsuousmous ansa gaa* s*" -

Committee EE.U"'"

9:30

" Introduction to the NCAI Nuclear Wasta National Indian Review Committee" s

si ansa situnos r

j x.a nnt.a. r"*"

Gail Chehak, NCAI Natural Resources Cocrdinator JuzsAv. ansa Joan Ho.

ruert s nea 9:45

" Overview of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of~1982 -- DOE

,mgsagus ameA and NRC Roles; History and Timeline for Implements:1on; w.a

.,a Update on First Repository Siting" i

musmooseansa1 b%%y 4

- * *"'f, * **

Bh, Director, Siting Division, OCRWM o

l wontwaas.te.na ansa Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

i no..a.aer.

Catherine Russell, State / Tribal Liaison Officer, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.

4 rnoma n. wa.e.

anner E T f,'"*"

11:00

" Briefing on Second Repository Siting - History and

    • '* s. nae.

Timeline for Implementation; Process for Appiying for Q***,sy,vo ans' Pre-Notification Grants" l

mnesa n.ne oo rwuno i

soutweastsam aasa Rich Schaussburger, Chrystalline Repository Projects I.I.U '*""

Office, Department of Energy,, Chicago Operations l

11:30

" Role of Department of Interior, Office of Trust Responsibility in NWPA" 4

i Sid Mills, Director, Office of Trust Responsibility, Bureau of Indian Affairs i

12:00 Lunch Break w

i ENCLOSURE 1 804 D STREET. N.E.

m,,.

s..

e.

n

  • Nuclear Waste National Indian A

Review Committee Meeting Page Two i

1:30 '" Reconvene - Opening Remarks" Ca-Chairst Billy Evans Horse, Chairman, Kiowa Tribe Leo LaFernier, Vice Chairman, Red Cliff Band of Chippewas 2:00 " Update on Plans for Monitored Retrievable Storage" W. Michael Curgan, Office of Civilian Radioactive Nuclear Waste, Department of Energy, Washington, D. C.

2:30

" Role of Tribes in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act -- History I

and Involvement; Tribal Program Plans and Advise from the Three Affected Tribes" Russell Jim, Nuclear Waste Program Manager, Confederated l

Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Ron Besser, Nuclear Waste Program Manager, Confederated Tribes of the Usatilla Indian Reservation Ron Halfmoon, Nuclear Waste Program Manager, Nez Perce Tribe Jim Hovis, Yakima Tribal Attorney, Member of the Law Firm of Hovis, Cockrill, Weaver and Bjur 4:00 " Discussion, Questions and Answer Session"

\\

5:00 Adjournment 7:00 Dinner Break 8:00 " Informal Discussion on NWNIRC Goals and Plans" q

Co-chairs:

Robert Holden, NCAI Natural Resources Researcher Richard Ackerly, Bad River Tribal Representative Wisconsin Radioactive Waste Board Advisory Committee l

Thursday, April 25, 1985 9:00.

Continental Breakfast (Suggested donation S3.00) s

Nuclocr Waste National Indian Review Committee Meeting Page Three 9:30 " Reconvene - Opening Remarks" Co-Chairs: Jim Albrecht, Tribal Planner, Coeur d' Alene Tribe John Chapela, Esq., Legal Counsel, Navajo Nation 10:00 " Role of the State in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act" Jim Kleinhans, Executive Director, Wisconsin Radioactive Review Board Greg Larson, Director, High Level Radioactive Waste Program, Minnesota Environmental Quality Board 11:00 " Transportation of Radioactive Waste" Wyatt Rogers, Senior Project Engineer, Council of Energy Resource Tribes Fred Millar, Nuclear and Hazardous Materials Transportation Project Director, Environmental Policy Institute 12:00 Lunch Break 1:30 " Reconvene - Opening Remarks" Co-Chairs:

Ms. Lana Redeye-Rozler, Education Director, Seneca Nation; Membor, New York Low-Level Radiation Advisory Board Hillary Waukau, Vice-Chair, Menominee Tribal Legislature 2:30 " Uranium Mine Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project" Louise Linkin, Director, Navajo Environmental Protection Administration 3:30 " Working Session -- Recommendations for Continued Work of the Committee, CERT and Other Tribal Organizations 5:00 Adjournment

e

..he

-er q

g g

sg urg u%W M

Ocs l;

y pI mmj ii A2]

i H

gDo o

e<

i r_~;q L

.e

~

.hn e

e I

m

[I+ v e

?;*

m C

r Y

N g

l

'[y

^

9

.n.,

s

=

(

g

[.L

g y

=h_

a p

e em sj '

'M,.

.g s.

. cu b""

' o R.

j L.T N-E.Q

, i

+

=

c b

m i w).,4,,

N b

i p,,A y

    • . ~

,4d Y

ge

,4 B

. g w"f

.3,

. m wn +

2 %

e_'

qM"

^

~ *

.w y

4 t.

,3. m. _

9 p 7g 3

S*

=

O{$*

s$%

'+>

h..

4:

% " ' ' ).,

4

?

,. +.,,

e

, ae h-g, % '3,.,

s;-

a

. aus U

- ; ;^

[-

4 e+

j<

,t-

+

g

-3

, %. t Mf v

y un ww u=. -

c

~

n.

y

.,, p._

+4

^m

.sv

, v; 5.> 7 p

~. ~

-; ;, ~ _

s g

j,

=y t-

,jf

+ <

, _. _ g -j _ ),

,, ;.1 % v

..V b )- _l,l??.,.,

s s-k j.

y f.

4.,

e fp '

w,7,V - 2 g T.J. -

.. c T"

+

A*

, m n.'"

%,n

.. p, p :- + ~..

?

,.v1 %s

<e eG

~

.d -., a "

. ',. ' -u. e, W@,. - 0 4

o*

y

. > _ -.,ej

,g e,b c

r V

A ; (;p o

+5 0W

+.y,

'a, y

  • a 3

? ~

% Jip; p. g' ~: l(%

Jh?,

~ >,,

' '..8 d N r.,Qq, p '. :

f WL J y *?

~t

?^?.

.\\ x -

g

  • y

.e _ +

...his,

,s,-

, A QQ sT

.t y.

f - O %. 4 ~%

m a w

. e

\\_

m Y

e, N_

' /

h h

%',A-+, '

=. m.-

E n,

- - ['N u. ~ -..

.. ~

.'d-M ',a., 93.J.k.

% k;> < Q.',,,,-)s._

$D'

, ' Gf f, h. p 5-.A (*.

,- gQ,.,

"v. y g, c 7 ((%

'g'.

eh?ti h,NJ' ' ' -

?. 3, 4 P,. q. ] e,..+....

q J

^

y s.

~. y.

,s,, p.

g s.

x

. m

- i

u. y =,. {.b.. _ t a?y W

- %n, - + }%8* Q :.'W 3 9.c 3

\\ - %u,. -i.

,s, m

z

.. +

,~.

w~a.

v.c : ;

.e

. e:. -

qxy:w

,%w ~

~h~ ;+,s;% > s.Wy@'* Le.h.

RQ: m w mp;p;p.;t +. w.w: 7.w q

R 'y g ~. 4.9:... n w 3;[,.X

. m > 4..s;p

- m.,r

,1.

o i

~

f.-

.c,; a, '

A

.< s);fe" :3,

-3

+ -

w-.

g.

...g W, g/i a

+

1-w.

s

  • :' ?

,,v-m 4

%.4,y..J. f,, r?%,,f..,., T.E ' ?

'.% a4:n. r,. <s,,,.'

T a

9 sv f-4

((- t,

e 4c,( ];

.-+A.,,

p Q g. f 3

~

x; >

- 4 ;g%f 7,gg g ;. 2 3...', p; n,9 Q,,A s

rw r:+,

_ 9 9:x,,

yr u.w M~3&<

1.,

w.;y. g%w ? ;, le %+ : %W:p. Q. ~T,;_

w,p mx y~.,. ;.WQ;p,CM;%,g, h:%.

if R

a.m,

~ n#.

p m.>. v m.u.,. ~;.. p,.

4

.m L t,, l_ *R

,psd".~

w

?%%..,,

,-[f;I J,Q '

  • h a'-

q7 M,..,W-4

. > h J.

n,f h

N$

'., -Q r 4 ^yw y, 4, Y * ' '"*\\ %w,,. A'%

e

-~

pa..

. 4 +$ '

e h ^^,,. -* l ' ~ [;. "- D'Lr._ -

o.

0ye, 2

3;

  • d P Q

.L n'

4 e_?

  • Q*a q -

- +

g, ' m 3.;.A: i,. ' g " 1 gQe,ppy 3

f*

e z

3 as,4 (.ac, e,xg g a

. n + r.z b n a

4 9c y

l.g.3.,

f UN ll k I l.

'G,

[ & S.

}

/ ',,

- n'?

, +

r

., '(

gyj N,/. 7 '. ' }

T f 7J.m. /. sp.** ' =. -y,. F gO 'l 'l

..tQ s';J'). m,

'(

_ m m, -. *e i { i S.*

o Yp f

p@ d

, gS.,fD..k i['7 N N @7 < j,@V.N[' _@u.

~ '

i-j hl g

9 6

y 17,.f.;,.s g

a w-y y.:,

e,

".,%p. w e am

,cu,. ~

J wj

,, c M

.ys x

e A.

- w hl v , 3._.i.,,,

  • : + ' ') _. ';.ll l *4
  • e.*

., :n A

+

4,"-

  • jy ;o y ~;.

d

.a c

p;;'. Q >.gy Q.,,.

Q i,,. 7 - -w

?'Y,Q*-Q*FA!; 3 -. '

,,,,a L,.

~.~+ p; ~~s6 *+ ~ 3.,.v..

'e_**

s:

s

.s + 1 y ~

,, & # G:p' r : p.a.,,

1 Q ' #7

.C i._e

,p

+

s...

n.

v @N.D,

, m W 5*lw JGQ....

W'g4 9 W h.

+ -.., -

,,',.,.,.ss, e.;t o ^'

. ;, -. b.'c,.

-~.,

~

r a

yrme,, *

..,e,

  1. n,.

m

+,.

m

, ** *,; j_.

n,..., s, ;. y g-o.

.,+

en.

s

.y

,4

.--ne 4 A_,z~

vs

+

(..

.: +

y yown.g v.

n P

.'j 7[,,

. c.NI.,

v

. ~ [ "'m. ' ' " ~

e.

N_ y,,

, pk

-.{ s..[w. c }

s.L.3 ))I.,.c " M.,.

,y

^M*

e..-

sGm'*

4 N ENCLOSURE:2 W W W,'

y$w$*%MQQ:

mMQL. W,

V, -,, f,v, J

.a.

am,

~

. a u.c

~

p

,m v.

s

,, ~.y g 7 h v

+ \\j g; s s

[

i i

Purpose

  • Provide information on:

- The DOE Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program, in general, and

- The Crystalline Repository Project, in particular.

  • Gain an understanding of tribal concerns.

4 1

l

l l

N..

Northeastern

', [,

Region 1

i r

f i- ~

\\

,,-m North Central Region I

'g -

L.

jW

-5 )\\'.g& J i

l

'L.

t

<t' d j,, f h

\\

1 i

N

?'*

j 3 1 y [ t>

I t

~~~~~~{,_.

f southeastern
  • f Region 1

(

~.

i (9

A

{-

,_. L J

Exposed Crystalline Rock Regions Being Considered for Second. Repository 2-ee

"1' = =M i5 l

L 5

['

'4 ~.j~ ~

,/

5...

{__..\\...:i j

~ h %l t

q i

/,

i

/

+ - -

.1.g i

). ~__&

=

t

_. & - 1.: :.,.,

1.

s. (

l 1

===,

c' i

.)

.'\\'p l.J>.) := ',

\\.\\ {- F---

~

f,.

. ~.* *,

r l

. #.4

~5 ~

t

- r..

,/

j===.

.Y:.

. _. _1, I

-n l

i'*'

"b S Megawatts s.

Licensed to Operate 91 76,679

=

Being Built 36 39,842

=

A Planned 2

2,240 129 118,761 Because of space' limitations, symbols do not reflect precise locations.

1/1/85 l

Nuclear Electrical Generating Capacity 3

Authorizing Legislation Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982

  • Approved by Congress 12/21/82
  • Signed by President 1/7/83 Purposes Establish schedule for siting, construction, operation of repositories; first repository operational in 1998 Establish federal responsibility and policy for nuclear waste i

j management l

Define relationship between federal government and state governments Establish fund to cover disposal costs i

't 4:

1 4

4 4

DOE's National Program to Dispose of High-Level Nuclear Waste Safely dispose of high-level nuclear waste in mined geologic repositories Satisfy radiological health standards and environmental protection criteria Safety confirmation by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission An objection by a host state would require overiMe by both houses of the U.S. Congress i

S l

Places Being Investigated for High-Level Nuclear Waste Repositories ll /,

(, f Northeastern 1,

e Site

,(

Region b.

I

,/

(

\\~ ~ -

_ _b.

g9 'Q

- ~

l l

~

f North Central Region

[ N.

x'y-k j

l i

/

-)--

/u p" j

N b

{

'N h

Nevada.

1~._

\\(g d. +,,. ?r k

Test Site f Gibson

'M

'd Dome N

)

[

S Sites

\\.k /

.- {

Southeastern

\\

7-Fq ~~

' h m.-

.m Region

'l Vacherie Paio Duro

..!/

Sites M-r Dome Richton 7

Dome

(.

___ 4 Cypress Creek Dome 6

99

Potential Host Rocks for Second Repository

  • Basalt Crystalline
  • Salt
  • Tuff 1

Other VAokba 5 ro dc -

Crystalline rock sites may be compared to:

  • Remaining characterized sites from the.first repository selection process
  • Other geologic formations 7

l Why Crystalline Rock?

Crystalline rock formations:

- Are abundant; many are large homogenous bodies

- Are strong, even when subjected to heat

- Are stable; mines in crystalline rock have remained intact for centuries without support

- Have low permeability.

Many crystalline rock formations are in tectonically stable regions that are relatively free of economic mineral deposits.

l i

l 8:

go

ee Characteristics of Crystalline Rock Regions 3

Being Studied for Second Repository The North Central, Northeastern, and Southeastern Regions are considered more favorable for several reasons:

  • A large volume of crystalline rock at or near the ground surface is located in each region.
  • The abundance of rock provides good opportunities for avoiding environmental conflicts and potential resource conflicts.
  • The regions generally have low seismicity, high tectonic stability, and are far from recent (Quaternary) volcanic activity.
  • There are large areas within each region of relatively low relief.
  • Major portions of each region have a relatively low-population density.

9 m

l Crystalline Rock Regions Region States North Central Michigan Minnesota Wisconsin l

4 Northeastern Connecticut New York Maine Pennsylvania Massachusetts Rhode Island New Hampshire Vermont New Jersey Southeastern Georgia South Carolina Maryland Virginia North Carolina 1

10' g.

4 Crystalline Site Selection Process Site screening

- National survey-in 1983, DOE completed a national survey of crystalline rocks which indicated regions which might have rocks suitable for further study for possible repository sites.

W Regional survey-Develop regional geologic and environmental UM data base for regions identified in the national survey.

Develop methodology for screening from region to specific j

areas for further study.

l

- Area survey (field work)-Field investigations to determine if r

there are sites potentially suitable for nomination /

recommendation and detaile'd characterization.

i

  • Nomination and recommendation l

l

  • Detailed site characterization
  • Site recommendation and selection j

Licensing and construction 11 i

I l

Near Term l

Crystalline Repository Project Schedule-

"s'u%f Regional Phase Area Phase Site Characterization Issue Final Region-to-Area Screening Methodology Document President Recommends ie i c ngress issue Final Area Recommendation Report YY

\\l 1983 1984 1985 1.986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992

[

1996 O

O O

Begin Area Phase Field Work issue Final Regional Nominate and Recommend Characterization Reports Sites for Characterization 12' ga

(

b , '

h i

it l

s a

o w

t s

p yray e

g r

r lec R

e c e:

t nul ng En a in l i f

l s

lat oe a t c vb sa t

ne -

yt s

l r n e - s Co mh n c

t go s

,e E' y ri i aht b

a pf O

0 d

eom De Y

7 w

Dt r

5

.n o hn 2

f i

e ga 2

5 S. m ic ut-

,7 1

7 ob 9

1 Ue g 5

r o o

32 93

)

e gl h

e

5122 bI 23 7

n hao t

t ne t

2(279 sag uy i 2e 2

~

r9)

^

emf o, a '

7 g2 1

1 g

o d m",.

9s 3

j n1(

  1. , e viv.

)

3 r e s

.ine

,h t p (r o

'.S 2e( r ah e

' j[

Mr e

~

1 M,2x,?

2ot ca 3

s e

7(lagn e c r y at i

.n 5hnae m:,'

t 2

y1;,..c.y<.

2cor e

2niaM f

8 r

s m

a g su ir 2r eMl i

s

{

^

9eo io g

7BRl n e

a

~W~w(Ww

  • t,?

,a't y _,

1i f cf l a 2.

~

f il n

e n-n

, 9nanio t

e vo

)

or 2it og i7Of,gn%s

.k.;

t.;

o~i ji e

nie h

ci ol t

g 1

p

,y M

(la r

,~;'

a c ay r a e

3uCeeR,'

t

.'g; - (

,A f

f a Pn Rn p

e o S *,"

.t j ?{

d w'

.Ovhne i

}t p.,"

yi r'

. yo

  • sn t;

% ewe.

t rt ef

,PEr i a e f ~3. r i o es Wo v

t1' Cg

,c oi

' 2/yaf <,

l n N, t a s e L

t d:

.t

.f

(-

. tg% aw+4PMMgn '.'c.n. P g t d

a ee oi f

i reh oVi f

,sd V' h k efw c t

e S. e h u,

s e :. ?,[.,. imA t

ri p

r t.,;

g

)

o.3x%5 w lw i.,f;~+mt o u u oA

.Ws oe -

t gt o d

't g

, <M

o. m e l r r t..

p; e

r e ePu a

5 shlinc.t.

n * *V,,w,' %;&. s u c, S, f

~

Wn&;,..,,.9ipn&;:%,.I e n o n9 ni o ed e

a <M ire d v e 3 ahe N, r

~.

t e tnyt t

r n

nr c

v 4 n)M,c s r sn e

r,,

a g,Q'.j Q gn a

mT up.,s; nx; f

f a ah oed 1

y nA0 ef oR s

s A w'y

deYiO%t i

nv(kg,.y d,vs8p;WnxeWE s es. n ncee a,

1 zl ii+

ej v

n f

k ei n r S. W B. e. ;,i f

y:

t i

n a ai w ~ ' > mw M l

aa 4 rt l t e e e

y;i. e,.rr.

(s A,. f.n.l t-Cn uMeJrF egus ec m

.~$yW;w. e1l ss,tMns h.

u

,.Kig e-e

.*1

, Mo 3

e nt e

eH

.Qn

.t r

,.AKe nc aC-u s

ei$l

'(

.Z' ',s

?.

i 7

. be, <a h t. l ~Nr6 ompf1ee,9pl ur 4

., ~;mg i MQCP 9 m yo eiu u c H,i j,iu ~ o ;s g.,i a

h

~,sL gMuM +,7 -i s

eo e :

e

,' a. M,y&g di,;.$ p3W. M a+% j,g M

% h. ~yr.D e U O c 9 A,t D D M k D,e 4R.,3 + h' 'e.,j., a

. V,

t.

.f se t

0gCS. PR, F e

0e t.

wili

,6 e% g..'

  • us ew!

y 1

r t

S. f 0e r r q.

r n* WFwrh,

-.f wlp%a.

Q.h3

[?

.U d

{

. wa ;t

>a+4, @,p+tyw ny[Y'-

a.ydO,y #

g' g"$.g:Q'v _gh iDNYh.j s t

.f N;bj

,j e,,

,f4b

r p'*/.,'..%.

i n h& Go[:;P,MM5EAmy' L

i

.+g,,

mp.,. x%h.b.Mmu+t g/a74'4,6g,,:nb 5 Wu y.

f

&a

~n.s,N r

,nQ.

,M.

c.,p.

p@

ge@N g

.r4y :5yb y

z

.wqt, t

/

M h :ts.kEe.m g &;fJ

,~.hY.i, nam) u T; gWMv,g:w@$b sQgMAy.j%,.%Wp. g.9.Mm&s.bx,@Q4.%.

i M.Wb. >

y&.0s. : E m eq f

t dg.i-,

g-S. g l

$,My :

y%

y

,s*y naf.c. ~, ) wa.

4m,/h,.s*.

v o.-

. p,'lf; Wf Q y#khfp,M.v,3].

c g%yNe

. s4 % r,4 p

e q&t&ghhmpm s

V y

c.; W.py4,jW7 IFw%Q.

n e

e.

n p

, Mumm.u~.'py:*:?%n~'O.WMvvp.w"t_wy/

.nL

.g

w-t t e L-

,&Qj$.d+7.@a..

. v,*.

%pK;Me4Mmg7 QMkx.np%

.t~

%ew-9

~

iM s

f g

. &$ ^'

..hy h.

. O[g -

i a

x~iv %e

/

Jmyss.s. p_yd

.'a y

py yi oE%.:gm>1pbe".

..y8;

%~,'y;a

.pj

.$ s. lpy~.uh M %s~

p1&W 4,

fg3.A@@j,.mr.N.Q..

g y

L L

mm 36

s'

. *u,rp.dgw%,w. ~'%*'.w,;, yE hks;:hg%7 ?- 4JN NgMT, a

s 8

Q.t

' N oa Q

ayx ~ q t

,l 4

.s m '?..

V,,." ;s s

v&x.[*vg g$7, y'

oq

.%u L" O hh;c,@ca, g iM'

" ;wM. q).o

>fy#,, t.,;c.grtWn.Li ye

  • p w e i.

. wwU"3 k,4.my

%hs

.4g~m.y.hdfw%s$pQdgN

/,mM#MMM

..s rbyyn [h,$

1 g

.i

, m f

s.

>n.ge,:

v sh

,%u#

' ; 1%r, Y L;e,Wm@ v.,9 4

i.

,. ~

4

/,;

Y fm.q,m,* g

..ggaJ.1 W

t) u i

(

+ xg f

'y

.A n?,

{

p

+l

.r G,

j

.Y5

.Q-.s jJ m3,Ep,M/L+.n['y u r, j%

MQy,%cFQ

[

r p,vn s.h Me,QWn@$OhT+

m&%:?. Ae;A,m ' %~~[9,s?

o s{

y

,p.

r

?

gQo,. p<x.{, m, &m.Yj.

gQ+~g.

L4 q

. t W, : n. ~h '6 7;

v,;

,M g.j x. x

.y

,J s :,v

.w y

i.

t e.

yW:

- +

.. '6..

m fM 8

1%, ~ a. g *,D

. K3 n,1n,'< :p,.% yM@[y;g.% q ~4 D~glc.Q$g.

ghM w&M Q W.?

  • ,.f l

i a

4

.fygLQy d t

uw' Y l.

Q7 Ol U pJ $a,m w5&,t h>>o,,"'sh:$

a f

a Nu.$.e x ghbYsi M..p"4. *,

p haa*+.w

-Q m.e:@wW.mm?oJg;m;Wmu,f4 y

y[.

/ O Ms Lp4'qs,%AG W

' bg%x ys,.' I/nev$.a.V;c p -

3

]y O.U j

,99 w g&j*.Mv

  • s pvh%7, %@44e% 3Qwr

',:jl mo.l5 z

,f" p@p~Qc.R.J@b my% f 4

M

. ~

6 7

+ yk

.7 3

,f Ws

.Dv. Wc M

bt.s,v

.'f

.I

,x&.QmnM,.b.

.>syT c y.. ny. -

n

.,a p A g';ry

)< ~,&* %,>q3 1

~1a.' y; g, j

1 3f 5

c Y

.'1

-f u

<'t

' L, i'

}

3

<

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20125C154&oldid=4280094"