ML20125B728

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to to Chairman Hendrie Expressing Concerns Re Emergency Evacuation Plans & Burden of Shutdown. Emergency Issue Receiving More Attention After TMI-2 Accident.Efforts Being Made to Avoid Delays in Operation
ML20125B728
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 12/13/1979
From: Kane W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Wrinkle H
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 7912280112
Download: ML20125B728 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

,( o g UNITED STATES ( .t.2 9k y}),,f.g i

p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM!SSION WASHINGTON. D. C. 20$55 hjg 7; / l

%.~....f DEC 131979 Mr. Harry H. Wrinkle 3315 Turnbridge Drive Sacramento, California 95823

Dear Mr. Wrinkle:

Your letter of October 22, 1979 to Chairman Henc ris anc Mr. Denton has been referred to this office for reply. Y:u ecressed :encerr. about the operation of SMUD's Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating S:atier, :articularly emergency  ;

evacuation plans, the hearing being conduc ed by a . At:nic Safety and l Licensing Board (ASLB), and the econo .ic Fardshi rs ass:ciated with plant shutdowns. You also mentioned a prep: sal by Aerojit General Corporation for disposal of low-level liquid radioactive waste. ,

l With regard to emergency evacuation plann'nc, we a:preciate your cornents and concerns and want to assure you tha we are wc-kin; with Federal, State, and local officials to enhance the emergercy plans at all operating nuclear power plants. Needless to say, this issue is receiving core attention than it had before the accident at THI-2. A c:py cf your letter has been famarded to the appropriate NRC Offices responsible for this issue.

As indicated in Mr. Heltemes' letter to ycu of July 27, 1979, the responsi-bility for decisions regarding the hearin; cn Rancho Secc was designated to an ASLB. In response to requests frcn Fr' ends cf -he Earth, the Environ-mental Council of Sacramento and Original SMJC atepayers Association, from two individual members of the Board cf Di-ectcrs cf SKD, and the California Energy Comission, the ASLB will convene a hear'ng to '.itigate issues that have been ruled appropriate by the AS'.B. Tris ' earing is scheduled to begin in late February 1980. The public is inv'ted :: a: tend the hearing.

Your next concern related to the shutdown of Rancho Seco. As Mr. Denton stated in his letter to you of July 23, l.:79, we were aware of the econoric hardships encountered while the plant was shu*d wr. Our primary respen-sibility is to assure the protection of tr.e heaMh and safety of the public; however, we have made every effort te avo'd unnecessar/ delays in the resumption of operations at Rancho Secc, as wel' as the ctrer Babcock &

Wilcox plants which were shutdcwn.

On October 24, 1979, the Aerojet Enem Cave-s":- C:r:a y subr.itted a tcpical report for review by the NRO. h's re:: , 'Rac' cactive Waste Volume Reduction System," describes a sys:er #:- : ocess'n; licuid anc 90003083 P00R BRGINAL 7922280 Il CA

4 "r. Harry H. ' Wrinkle OEC 13159

-combustible radioactive wastes and converting these wastes inte a dry sah/ )

ash product. We assume this is the system you centioned in yot.r letter. l The NRC staff is presently developing a schedule for review of this rep:r.. j We appreciate your interest and hope this information satisfies your cc cerns.

I Sincerely, l 1

4c c W. F. Kane, Acting Chief Standardization Branch Division of Project Ma ent l 90003084

, 3315 Tur:.irido urive, t -

Sacramente , Californin, 95823, .

October 22, 1379.

11arold it. Denton, Director of the Office of Nuclear lleactor Regulatior_

and JosephM.Hendrie,y/

Chairman, U,S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,11.C. 20555.

Gentlemen, Thanks to Mr. Denton f or his prompt reply to my letter of June l 14, 1979, Rancho Seco, in Sacramento, is breesing a.locg and has had only a few minor tie-ups since going back on the line this s acer, not enough to upset the power picture here in Northern California during one of the hottest summers in this area ou record, As you know, Pacific Gas & Elec* Co. 'Isa ns" power to SMUD when Rancho Seco is shut down and gets it back when it is running, plus buying all the surplus power the f acility turns out over ar d above what SMUD needs for its own cus tomers. Wi.thout Seco this summer, this part of California l would no doubt have experienced brown-outs and black-outs on the hottest days.r Public of fict buildings here have kept their thermostats at 80 degries and SMUD GE William Walbradge did a great jc b in his TV appeals to .

SMUD customers to eave electricity, and they did. This winter the Utility District is busy putting in changes requested by h3C and upgrading perf or-mance of all Seco's personnel.

Steos are also being taken to set up a dispersal ulan f or all persons living in a 10 mile radius of Seco. Pacific Telephone has a page is tuis area's puone book with a map of the entire a.rea showing zip code numbers. If SMUD takes a suggestion given it, this par of a map showing the zips can be used with all the major highways overlaid on it, such as 1-5, 80 and 99 going marth and south'.and 80 going west and east and 50 going east. Fortunately, major high radiate from this area like spokes ?in a wheel. Anybody currently living in the 10 mile ra.dius cokld be evacuated withoutwerowding the highways since it is more spe.rs ely settled than most other parts of the area. Check the map f or the zip e ode and chere/$gQ no.

Since your nuclear engineer "in residet.ce" at Seco,is seeing to it that SMUD is f as t making it "f ail saf e", 99 per e ent of the people here would like to s ee you call of f the November hearitz on saucho Seco because foes of Nuclear Power, such as a wealthy actresa ve won' t name, will gather f unds to fly in ac tivists and " experts" to stir up a nd cause scare tactics to alarm local residents. They did this at the tris.1 cf eleven protestors

g. who scaled the f ences at Seco earlier this year (not one was from Sacramento r, or other areas adjoining Seco) and made a " circus oct of it."

The two month shutdown of Seco this year cort SMUD customers well

over two million dollars and PGM
custumors 38.2 millic: as PG&I had to buy oil where it could to push production on the s11 fir ed ;1 ants to the tune of as much as $28 a barrel. New that Diablo Canym a res:y to go, it a cos tiu_

PG&E custoiners about a million__do_Uare a dav in int e rc et c o s t s, o n its much over a billion dollar plant, in personnel reacy te go t-t being held back froc g working, and in the value of the elec.tricity so: t e: ng turned out. This does not even ..ention that vast amount of precious oil ti.at :as to be used by the utility that could have been saved the moment Diad: C.:you goes on the line.

Aoro-Jet General Corporation of S2crwr.:o :.a come up with a meau, to reduce low level liquid atsaic waste 90 per e er.: to t residue that won't burn, absorb moisture and will not " eat througu- ne:.al. Ray Garcia is mer-ebandising the device. Ic:a1 pub catign. Four have been sold to U.S. Nuclear Seeattachedclipping[from4._

Planta. ,,.

kr.: 7 d.

-f,4 9*fo r t u

?00ROREmi. .

90003u83 smJ m uees2

Attachnsats Chemist Engene,Vander Wall and his team came up tith the below mentioned process, which Itay Garcia of Aero-Jet General is now marketing along with his marketing group. They are talking to SMUD and to managers of nuclear plants throughout the U.S. and the world.

Governor Dixie Lee llay of Washington and the Governor of Nevada have now banned burying nuclear waste in theirostates. Perhaps the Federal Government could be induced to build two disposal plants quickly at these two sites and nuclear plants in tile nation could be charged for costs in disposing of their liquid and solid low level radio-active wastes. These sites for the plants would be a the dump siten themselves and all the dangerous naterials stored there now could be pro-ceased and made harmless.

Garcia's phone in Sacramento is Area Code 916-355-2722 and he is there Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Time.

NEW DEVELOPMENT BY AEROJET A system for reducing the low and liquids from water purification level radioactive wastes from nuc- systems, laboratories, equipment lear power plants by as much as ten drains, laundry wastes, and cleaning to one, developed by Aerojet Energy solutions. These low-level wastes Conversion Company of Sacramento, should be distinguished from high will be used by Commonwealth Edi. level wastes which are generated son Company of Chicago and during the reprocessing of spent fuel Carolina Power & Light Company of elements.

Raleigh, N.C. in generating plants Commonwealth Edison will currently mtder construction. utilize the system designed by the In making the announcement of California firm at its Byron nuclear the contracts totaling nearly 56.5 station 100 miles west of Chicago million, Aerojet Vice President and at its Braidwood station, which Wayne E. Kramer explained that the is some 40 miles southwest of the system utilizes a unique fluid bed city. With a generating capacity of heat exchange process which con- 2240 megawatts each, the two plants verts the low-level radioactive liquid will provide electric power to 2.2 wastes to a free flowing solid which million customers.

has a consistency similar to table Under the terms of the contracts, ,

salt. The salts then are mixed with a Aerojet will supply the hardware 1 and associated engineering services l solidification agent such as cement and put into 55-gallon metal drums to the utilities, who will install the for shipment to burial sites. systems.

Low level radioactive wastes gen. Aerojet Energy Conversion Com-erate.1 by commercial nuclear power pany is a division of Aerojet Liquid Wants consist primarily of materials Rocket Company of Sacramento.

SACRAMENTO BUSINESS OCTOBER 1978 The cost is about 2 million dollars each according to I Garcia.

l lili.E 90003086 l 300R OR G Nm,L

3

.m _m ,. ..

r'- "-

" ' t- ' '

dETR0POLITAN Q #xes aos4" HELP US HELP YOU - > '

POSTAL -[;

l SACRAMENTO 'i. !Yi iE0GRAPHICALM  ! =My.Us.e a. Zip Code .

1 4. . .n. ni . .: r . it .

..,... *  ;;;p ...,

. g - C 440 2481 ,s.L IIPl0DESW a. r '-M' V.".?;;

m.

~

e 3.m.:. .:. .. w>. ;_';

s % * * *: * .* < &!.: p . -

.R.^.v.. call.

--;y,.. ~..

, , + /.~.. . . . l n.

"t't ; . j: HK

. .,.g&vy g p*

4. -g w..e

.. m..:

.r- rNe m - -

.,'.--- .J *-. .

.j,y..

3 "

I. .# { * ;TY. .y. d I*

.a. = .

,' 8. &"? k" . .. .c.

, . .t,;.Q.Qf.' ('=L'p,,, ;* * / ,

1 e ...- .

w.. .t ( / . . . .

~ . .s c

> .m :4~

v -

p, 3.n . .w af.,:.gs."

g

. L:.:;;'~7

-W

~

p.

.~

'.,:. . s.m ,. m ip . g., g

' ' ,... ;c D

(

m' . .;,,

.,. 1. ry . , 4 3 . sun .g .

, w L. q f.

.f:;,,, . vic.. t 1.. . ,,,;;c..

w /.:surur .couun ; Q .. - y'i,.

r, , . .i p;{;;.'( ,,$. ..M.

.. . .s agextm .Aw

,,, ,,:..r.", y:w . ..<.j.

y M**Q u

.g jgE n

{ .h I. , a

_RostvtllE 4 ) . * * -6,G . N 'a +-  ; .,* /.

  • i

. - . , j,,,, g.:. . (eg f . . m .., g. , . , .. j rotse., v,.,,c; % ;,y..

- p. _ ' '

- J ." 4i..

dc.g L'-d '. + crtRus wtic>rrs :l -- -~~ ~---.

M",O,b@'3 g ru. tora

. .i 4; 7,[.ph )7 Tg' '

") - . . [ - srm

\, a u. ..

Q.li

  • ,?* (.21hD.) , . cm.:rwtt I, i ', ..

E- '. t . .e r y . . - t,8 ,n ",y 1,g

. y ) ,. /

!. \ q, . . , ..  % (vrgn s.

II - M Q -' '

W f62) 2

s f '. ..;-n a M\ l'- A \' nio Ue. A

~~~r D . ' . f{ *.*.%'d.'d, A .? ay,/'#' !

M * **2h ,,e ya

~* -

s p

h1 $-

J 5

D.

Te / ," '

! . 3Y '"g

  • ) / .

A' *. ian G s. 8. GTDT) (gg

  • - i 9., g.. ** . .

, gi ,.]

.  !.~ p'.y . , U.,. ]

<8 .,, .'.,,y' .,,.

  • I.,6 '

"*\ (MU) ' h,. .a F 18l CAMS i;,

- l Ctt PASO br*s' . .g -.'. . . .w jf-) ([I , (MUD"3 . , , ,", # Es00%

\ @ }s 'N. f g *[

\

kM,

.M hf.!  %. l

~

, j %. ""

.(('TrDT) I. dCThs.T) I,. 'NI tv*'

I* k h 'd M '. 4 ~z i ha.# t .g%

      • t *w *. it'. cauto avr $.CARPMCHAEL' l con ~W' '', . J'% 'ki' * ' ' - ha=.1 ~-' ' "*"
  • E; 9n . Ylg, ?.,.

," *

  • QQn. r- . .. , wf

U?'

_ '4f.

_N  ; AROfN

, Wav

6. "

~

p CV AER0f tT . . a l O **gre*,- TIf}2

  • yoto j, COUNTY - __ . . _ ,

7- 'dp*y* i, 7N, gu _. [ e.,w,

./

,y f_

) }. .. P,, p . , GCD .fctq: ml3 w Ct,u . g '".'~ *4

'[, 4. ... :yF1~4

. BED -

97-Wb . ,o cetis ..,s, p_.

'y i lJ -

,;. w.A *'.'0 -.'* .

MArutR Ars .  :

j.,.0~4 1 ,-l' . @/ v.'+< ',^ . -*,

' ;3 m u Ar p GTm ' gTW)

M' j# , _ (,'. , ) \ , M, onty f .##33

  • 67..,., ,, N/g

. , e. M , ,, , '

)

  • l'

. . '.N*: # p#"-(,T[r .V'.'lD ss

- ~ " -

P N .. d . E .

a s-,i..e k. s - '

.2,.

J. 9-iQ '5".4,t; ..#

' "'.*d. -'

'..-a. 09"

,7 - - . "., e \ r.

e. r,. e ,.y ,, I
  • t **?E b .

L s' -9 ,..- #

aug .#/*

,. .. a- }

~

kM { Q.21D ,

3 g

GD,,,,i { '

(, ,_

' $ [. * . , . .'W  ;,,,,,

  • %,s O . . -... .. e,hp y,.g, ,[. q' 9 .' g

,[ ' I . , ( ? .i -, I; *

p. 1 . .

[ ,.

4 y .

YO ;I

  • k . h, . 'f i } ***l ,. - [

M.

[ P

..,.g L . i j . '6' . , .. i p s.., s. . l

' j., n, .,e..).  ! . enu w or:s4cawturo coum .  !.. ' . .. ..: J '. .% ,?, * '

u - - w. ~. . .. .

,~. .! so m. n h.w .. y . w.. , , - r..,-.

~_: g .

..'.n. .g. u w

.: - ,s . .,. , ...c... ."w/ . .g.: : r ? , .,, , , t,g., .. ..

. 6. ..:,qy. :., . m. r .c .~.v .. .

.y .. .

). .,. .,. ., , . y. 3

^g .e, ..m 1.

."  : c.. . SPECIAl. ZIP CODESl, ' .M'-

,;n... -M,M .,

,,dO

. A.y

~ - r e 4,.n . .

.- , ,... ZIPCODES '-

ZIP CODES

..:r.. . .t. BOX NUMBERS

. ... , ba. :... ..

. . u .P.hr < BOX NUMBERS

. o. . , AlphabetsT.ic. .'.r. 7.~... .. .w*.C..';. . m. .

. ;;.95 813 r. '! . ,'Wf /

  • 7001 7 . 74 37 . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. 9 582 6 f-1231 ........... .. . .... 95a01 -

.:, . .: /. 8001 8320 ... . . . . . . . . . .:. . . . . .?. s5 s 18 -

i . l W.,2 41 4 71 . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .'. 9 5 s c 2 . X..f. . 9 501 9 9 8 9 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 913 23 .'

q .

. 95E03

. . . . . . . . '. 9 5 313 , . . ,

~' '

tD. , ~; . , [481 71 1 .*. . . . . . . . . . . .

G# <13001 13999 ... . . . , .

l 721 9 5 9 . . . . . . . . . .. ..... 95304 . ./ a, 15001-15999 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 i 313 . ., .

==% "

961 113 9. . . . .. . . . . ..... 95605 .. r: l . i .,,,c,

' 160001 161434. . . .. ....... . . . . . 9 5 316 " .

,mN 1141 1379............. . ..

..95s06.43..:./_ . 19001 19497 . . .............. . 91319 p,3 1, , 13 81 1619 . . . . . . . . . . )..' ;i 20001 20669 .... . ......... . . .. 913 20g*~  %,2

\ 1621 179 9 . .. . .. . . .

.... .95s07.:-gg/.

9550S.o " - <

22001 22634 .... ... ....... 95322 "

f 7' \ 1801 2038.... . . ... 95E09 h .!. '

2 6001 2 663 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5 3 2 6

~

... 95310 . 28001 28775 ...

.. ........ 9552E

.* kO41 2271. . .. . . . . .

1 2d12511. . . . 95B11 38241-3B9:0 - . .9i!35 ~

. 25213027.. ..... .. 958*2 41001 41999 . . ..... .9I549 l '

254441 255516 . .... . . .. 95S25 130001 130:2 E .. .. .. .95513 '

' 5001 55 89 . . . . .. . . . ....... 95dt7 214001 215017... .......... 91321 f l

l :nm8 60001 6107 6. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5 8 60 , ',

'~ ~

. , .. J

u

.;f..

. .T .

~ . ... .

y .

. ~

s.-

~

^ ~

Page A24 THE SACR.OiENTO'BEEUSund y; August 19,1979 .

.' ~ . '

> e .c -

~

oil Crisis So,ution%.Ft c ..

- + A. u, e .; ;. . .
s.  ; ....

. r . ....f. . , . &.

4,' Q

' Euro{adCornmi i M '- :  ; y :-lt.:.'

gca o + . atc F .*. % % G :1.~. W J .

ear ]owerc u' - ** w

'- L z4-- :WQ nuclear power plants on.its order books. -

^-  : ) ar power, as the Fren:h a.re dcing.c--

By Don Cook e" "- * * * - ..

  • "'"' mey + e t'. .' .; e Sweden - Six nuclear pcwer. plants.

,1.os AngelesTimes *

'I PARIS'- On the Rhane' Rive:- builtin Cuba. easti+,& of' b' 'including 7 - M ! components producing 3.760for megawatts two orplants 23 percent be Franc,e's secend largest city. -

Lycc. the  :.C' p-InWesternEurope.Britam France I highestproportioninEu ope. Swedenhast est number of plants in operation. also

. great outer sheil'c!'thewor.d's first . .is next and West. Germany is 'in third has the stror. gest' anti nuclear lobby in

. commercial. fast-breedercuc.ea.:; reactor M ;slace/ France will move to the. top in the y . Europe: two sew plants have been com-

~- 'is nearing completion!% *MM +X '# next three years.( h.;-~

t - ' /  :* . pleted.but the govert. ment has'not given Z~l " win 1983. it'is sdeduled 'to's:irt feedingDThe .following"is a country:by-country 4;5 permission for them to be"put into p:,,.e 1.200 megawatts of electricity - e:ough ffsurvey'of the status of nuclear power and/ .: tion.~ " ? WD "" "N 9' Mi Six~ additional pla' cts are beink built"to g4 7't; sto supply 6M.000 homes-into th.e French.mthe. political problems involved in the ;prin-

~ . "powersystemM wV:4 O -w ' 'V!/cipalcountries of Western Europe: be ready by 1931. and if and wcen'they are

. - 7 Being built bya Fren.h Ge ma.n- talianN,,p'e France' ' Sixteen nuclear power sta " all producing it will mean'a other 5.000

', consortium at a: estimated cost cf 31Ah tions in operationcproducing 7.960 megac, megawatts.w.aking Sweden-45 percent I - -billion, the Supe Pnenix rea: toc is sym4*7' watts or 13.5 percent of the nation's elec. ' dependentonnuclearelectrieny.' ' -

1 lbolic of thelong-terrn conimitmeet t!most'.~O' tricit :The Frenchhavebyfarthelargest i J. e Belgium' 'Four plants. producin;-

'everywhere i= E:repe to meet the til cri- 1 of the na.

l* .

.'sts by stepping t= the produenoc .g.;-a of ucle total of 33 Enuclearprogram additional stations (includ. of any .

tion's country electricity. inThereEurope is not much

,1.660 of anm l .

far powec . .: ~ .-t I . W ing the Super.Phenl4 that will come into' 9 anti-nuclear lobby in Be;;ium. Four more

- -d b At present. nu: lear power accou:ts for c plants are being buil.16 produce an addi-

- 510.3 percent of L:e electricityprr.edu:ed in.h'ioperation between now und 1987, to addanother 34 7[+'"4

@ :the nine ' count-ies that trake t:sc the % capacity.U j ', ^~-' : By that time. France will getelectricity 4..Mi* M as estP'.i ^ point. power.Belgiucf

.  ; Common Market. compared wit: ,13.5 from nuclear ~

1mumuuss, percent in'tne United States. By 1235,g mated.60 percent of its electricity from. '..a$! e Switzerland"- Four plants'producinc l.660 megawatts, or about 14 percert c-4 p ;;expected _;;alants to incr already.

ase the nuc>.arundertshare in.J cons:ru:tica.are try in,the world., according .tonuclear current .

plants, more than any 8 Western Edrope to 40 percent. . - - s projectionsi - r i i ! .g. nto operationin1981.with 950 megawatts g-. , . Fastpreeder cevelopm ttst :n the United g,o West Germany - Fifteen nuclearW anc' wo more after that with 2.000 addec '

, . States.41oog with otheraspects of z=cieare.,. stations operating, pro' d ucing 9.305 megaf l.

. g{ . power. is beggec down m polnical techno- watts or about 10.4 percent of the nation'si '

>. megawatts. ". , . ; "* . -

logicainenvtror. mental, regulatory and d'i

" e Ital # " F " 'lan Pr od"" 'I'F~

. safety argur=ec.s. while the. Eur:p,ean,s.2.! tts*-l* th* 3 .". more plants '#

t,..e . to start. in theelectricity..Under r- near. future are ll'other construction

',

  • tion**E." oc p! anne s e*lectricity. .Three ar gy' .are moving stea:ily abead. -

." The sole Ame-ican breede p-ojecte .9..; plants that ant capacity. Seven will addmore 12.000 piantsmegawatts are in'the' to .;' 4~.junder construction a:d two are pla ,

ymmmm -g .c.xperimental rea:tcr :eing b;ih at ; inch. 7, long range planning stage. ; * '. -" "

  • Spain mThree ptant.s.prcducing 1.0-~ 1 p-- ,g. , River. Tenr has just surv:ve d a:otnerl ruegawatts: two recte under construction

. administration effert to.,eli=inate -., it by .5p'The ' olitical?problerns' Germany are highly surrounding .' with a nr,m pmm!: m nuclear ower'.in (g M . -*

e -

ttmgoffits!!nancing. 7 - ~t power ', $4(;f '

o,, ,-

.\ p:The Ei.ropea:s build nu:iear ':,..complexbecause between the federal and of statethegovern-division of powers q,c.more. g3 y *g p. ,

Elsewhere in Europe, the Dutch ha.c g plants faster tran trey can te b.;ilt in the . . ments. ,- *? large suppl _ies of na: ural gas and Roter '

-(

. United States. They have an ex:elienD - d's Britain - Thirty.three plants operat. . dam is the oil,refin'ng center Idr all of safety record. mth no accidents s far m.,

the nuclear worti" ;s of any ci tr.ettpow er+ ',. mg. producinglust over 3,000 megawatts I consider a ./ L Europe; nuclear program. s6 there has be '

g s or 12 percent of the" nation's electricity.

. . stations. G e .,erally. they have r ort confiT Eight mor'e plants are'under construction .d; Norway, awash ~tn. North Sea" oilf anc with,an enormous poten:ial fer hydroe

. heir a. n w es e* ro e s be ,toandpcovide twc are m anthe additional long range 5.000 planning megawatts._ ,tric power, has had no need es:-

8' .cause of the inter;ocking of gese: tment , -power l although the question is, under '

stage. ,.

authority over pab!icly owned c
1;i*. es. study and public discussion.
  • N-

' Because of the advent of North Sea oil. .

. There are ,s! nu
lear puer r.ations the British have not been under any great Denmark has no tuc'. ear ::ower and ;

throughout *a er.ern c.ur:pe. t:.- .; g ou. strong anti nuclear !:bby,% ~h

pressure to push ahead rapidly with nu
!e. -

.5.000 mega2 a. ; cipower.. eve .ty-ses en

, dd.tiona. ..:.<ar stati;ns :.re under construcut,n :r are ;.ar.ne: I:- c; . pie . - j, WS cll l M m u -': n e n M i s-s a _ m _'

uen by ee =ue of tne coe; :.:aee.

'a  ;. --;

, s. -

. and 3: are :nnue f:reema. u :n the Bee = . -

  • _ 'Y -6Wc

_w. '

h.9 ~ In Eastern br::e. cep :re :' ants : . , ,

' Class.f.  ! ted under eenst.r.r.:: =at ever e e :ut rive ; C j'

""'"""" vears G :a.:.e me r..;: e:.r : tt :ed  %(

'e e:tr:ci:y cf tre Tarsaw ?i:. :: ntries.

c:e:nosovu.w swa eru :as a  ;

444-3113 C'II .

[

y

.. , . - . . . . . . . 90003088 -. __

2nHRW Q

~