ML20117F109
| ML20117F109 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200003 |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1996 |
| From: | Kerch S, Reid J WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20117F084 | List: |
| References | |
| WCAP-14690, NUDOCS 9609030313 | |
| Download: ML20117F109 (18) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.
, c, **
....?...**L
* "f d ' . }
~ g ...
s".,....s.. . f.,..;.)..,..~..
.' ...,.E;?' . ..N,
. ,} ~ , l,',-l,.. . ' ' ' l' :* I/ h ', ... .' .f ,. 's Y.3.'di :.Y' $ p'p".*. N?
. ,. ..; _ . ' -:.?', .., ' :'.E '.. *, . .9..,* a
. ; ?. - . , ll :l
.. .*!uT.. . .;fr . ..l.* ;........, o:' 'l,',, .. . . . e. *,. :s. .,$T' -
, ; -< .. . ": P$
- n. *l? . ,'l9 ..;[
. ~ .n. . ....
s: ..
. , ' " . ^ , , . ..s : .: .1 ;
'g.. . . ; ., ,.:, .: . fj*' , ls
**7.s.,.,S,, '.9..
;. >. . n
. . ...s::n)...a.
s.n. . .* , \ . 'b 4 :s >
,'.t..4: . 9, . w + .g. . . y :y. ,;.. .. .s.':gt,
- n s.
. s :3, .
x it,.x. ' 9.~,. ..%. : .. .
..:.}p. ,.:,~...~. V y,*:;.. .e . . e :. V
't, .*
. . . . . . . :.r. : ...w.g..,. .;.
x : c.:l ..,.w: ..* p; :;.gIy..
~
- :. ..,1 ;;
..p.r * ;,.'.:.. ;."<. < :-
- ::.Q.. .,q+: ;.c...,v1 y
.. :a:::::; !.::;.b.-!
*Y. .....
<.4;,.:: .:n. a ..i ?.'l ;.:y:V
- n. :..n. .;f.g - ..;: s, -
y
..-.s,.g n...,,.:.sa..'... . . , . . . . .,.~:y a .. .. , -. i:.
- ::: : ,.q, -i. %
4 s.. x,.,, .: . :i . ;
- ,.. .:.4.... .,c.a,.'. <
...gw.9.=s. :,f'.
.. . :. . - :: . ; . m :....v . . . -. :. . .
a.., n .n
.'. N; ]:',';:: .' . .. :.'. !
[x;.l
*,f..: ._M. f'% {' *). f; . .,;.5 Y . .< 2; 4:;,,:.: . ;:.y,m . :;.'. .. hy Q .g; , ...., - :..,
W,;. p'% . .::y . __} qsp. ..2x. f. ;/;,.;::;.,. . .: , . . . .. .. .
\; '. * '.
,;y..':.3. ' ; .w,.'L.lQ' Q& ;
. .u'::,. .*'
4 .
^'
- .h y.$q.4%j
.Ye f *.,: : .y'.
. .y' .;
L.ir , q,j jl: ?.s z.
;.. . . .. +:w.o,u,. ,. ., .:: .7.. .cp'3 _7:: .G.q . .n:-sy;*e : :c ; . ,. - i. vg. .'4
.: . . ,:w .x .,,. -., )L .3 ., pf,e,7:,,,4*_ **
- V;
., 9 : <:,: - : . . - r ,: : . s,, , , ..
.m.... :<m:.9, :,h;4,
- .: :: .i g. .
v.;;:Qje .,.. .6.:+.' .. . . . . y .. .v ..:. - G
~, . . . . .
- + .: .. ; . . .~,.. : .h : e 4
c . :, .,. e. 9 *m. . 9 . r. .. s .. :s. . . s', '
'.%..y*,: ~. : \ - A %. ., O.3 . .% . -M .\ z .
.,.v'.e. . ..'.:>;.n
.' h!.:.. :l<.A.
' L ,,. ^
.6 lhk.h. .. . . .
.j .h h .h'b.
. . ../ $ .f,h; :b -
- . . .e
. ;,, ,';,.b;. . .pj'....7.,. . ...'. .}.,. ?E~f. ..
. f A ::.f. g .,':' ' # . ] ,.
h'.'
- s. . -l ' $'i* f..'; .i.*.'.l*," ._'. ^ *. * .,
ps:
- l. ,%. _;.
E'
~
a ..- * .. r T. :y.. , ..:.::3 <*e.. .ve.".t e- f.1, - . *. y;.
"g.,;.
,w, e d .u .s,l'-fQ v 1......-s ..,1 e ~. . ...,,...&.#
s,: ....s g-- n
. ' ' i'...a,..s.,*:r.'.-;1aV.u
.~' . .. . .. .:.. : ?:. &,. ....'...V.r* h ........*f...a'.' ) '
J....; l.1l' ., .llI;(( f'-
* .:- . . .. < - ~ -:.-.'. .
- g g. ., g .,
,v. ., ,g,...':,.,,... .;
.. ;;..^ .. ., . ,,',1, ..,,.e, .
. ,) '.*
1- e..
,y.
.f
^
. , . "; . . . .'. , . 'l '.: * .-_
,,,.- ...'., y : :. ,* s
,.,.1...-
. , ,, .. . , 3 c. % .f.4.-e,.,,..,.- ..
,.;.,..._,',...,....:,'-,..& .' , ,, . , . ;;4 .. ..tyi.:; ,...:. - .$. ,,e .nt,....
- ,.., -),*a-.,, .f . 4
..es ,
; ,,* 4. , _.,7 . . :np
,.o
- .c.1 s. , ..;t' T. p..v..s . .-c,.sl'*),."g...'..L.
- . . ; . or
...: .o. .
. ' . ,.:. > s .* n. e,.'. ,,, e, . 4. . S ..,;, p i,s .:..d.,.c.. s; ,. .. *. 4: .
,;.;y- .* -_ , . s. r.
o = .,
- .h
- y y";,,, . *.,. . f.,,,s
- .. -' .L ....,.,'..,s;.. 4
. . / , + . - . p f.r...;
. : '._. : ; y . e . .g s,. * :..a
#<. .. .. r . i
,y. y.-l-
. .,,c.,.3......
r .>.7l..$ o. .. ...>. ;. *, .. .f.-
.. a. .e.. p.....
p;....,..e.g..
. . ..9,'.,~ . .., ,. . .
s
),
n d '. . . . >....?i, N;: ~(..
. . YM ... s. n:: .<
- o. 4
. ser n.n. ; ..e.f.4-
,,.r, s y
.e..e..
.-y .y o. t . .
- .. : .n. i-
.t.. 3.,,.G ;.M .?.: .;;,f.. e.. . l .. y. L.<:.?. . u .T;. ;:i.... ,y m.
. C. ,.. ,.. ~. :* . .,~ n.. ,9.:.l..F..
..,.. ...,., . i. .
+:l'q::T ::.. y.1,3
;, .:t : . . V ,, : _
.; '. .: :. : 1:. . . .. , .. . . ~s. .- ..:.., . . '.6. .. Y.. .;;. .l.6. ..
.I .f.i*- r.\;...;l. :. ll,'%,s.
- , .. . '. . '. y . Y l.: 3, ;
.D..'+' "'y 1:c f' ' ::: 'O-O,. . :; , . .< > *:' -
- 1. . . ::, .. s..'- . .. . . . -
; s
,,,.].
. , . , i . ; ' ' ,: . ' . k .. ,' * . . m. *.- 'y:
- p' '
. l, ,e l- ' . '. .,'. ' O. . l :l. h":,J-l L*r '
s
- T..!l * ^ L; ', e'l:) O'; .. . . '. ..' g"_. {
' . ~ :
,1 ; d \ . . .
- r. _
. ' . .. : - l .., . . . ;
' .h.': , '.:. *. :.;_ *9 .-. ..;.-._. . . . . .* ;...
~.y,,..c s . .- - . i ;. . .) - - . . ;s a "l..
...,d..
- . . _ . .. . . , . , ..,.<...y.'. ,? .. .. .u ; l -
...e c
- r. -;.;f : . 3....y...... .^! " . ~....3..., .. . . _
r.,, ..,8...
- .;; .,,..,,q
- .;;*; <*. : :': :-
. - .y
.o s.
-.:.,..'.....l:_'_....'.,,'j.......:---:b':.':
, .; ;.. . :-l -s
',l-.,. ' .~ ; ; y r, .s,,
p/::*r
- ', . , . . _ ; . h ,,R__ ; - . .. :
~
' , ..l_. .;. , 6.; s.
. :.- t
. l- .' ..' ' * =
, _ , , . '. e.,.,. ,.4' 4 . . *> ..,s..
. ,2.:l". r. .+7 .' .. .:l..l
. : , s::
. .' ;._.lL . . '.i s :{. .;y, c., , ,.
- . ,, ; ..\
; ! i'6;.*l: : _ . . . . . . _;
.,sg".,' . .:. . !..a.
.. :C ' .?_ ...:'. -: . ..;.,a.. ._,[. '.;.. . ~;
. *:;. *. .". .:.* -c . .,
f.a ' L '; ' . .:.; 1y.<: ' :n es . ', .*,,.; .<..
'.; ;t ..s. .. ...., ...&. - - ~
. . . i. ..;.-}s.: h.:.,.>.
- .;. t. :
):y,
^. , . s... .c' .
... y ;.
..d . 1:". o. .; '.s!: ... -e _ ,. . \ e .:. ... a.::j*:,. *.\. - - - - -
;.'.. *e ~:s rz..: ..
*- .; :, *:: .2...
;,. . p q. . . . : ,,. . '
,1, .. . i. . : .'.9.:..,...;'.?.'.:...
o.
. ;.;...:>.,: ..,( ..- .y<- .- m.
~l : ., ; ;
- q . .v, ; e ,..;,..... ,..,,..,,..e; v _ . ., . .
.^- Ih. ^ '{ ll'. l:*; . ,,. '. . p .;. . T. l'
- r. .,.
j'; . ,' .; N; . .
.: ..so: ;;; ,.s . m. . ,.,,. ,. ;, . .
'.N.W;:.;t; ' l:'.9,
- 3. .*;., ; ;! ;'. ( , s b '-l .._
. . * ?:C.
V, : :,: %,
,,., . , ., ..t*
, .. . ,, ,..: y. ~. l*$. , . : O, -
' .:l...v,,::c7o'.h.
~_:.'..,',...c..m,..':
. .* L .p;s. . . .' :? *.i . ..4.'. ] D'..'l. ,..,'.1
~I l' '.:'. :.,n %
a
.-% a,, z.,. s:
'. .c.. ..- c .. - . - .'~.,:,..- ;
,.4 - , , :' . .'.,..=.,...y:.$. ' . ' v;,. ' f:,..._
. r ;.
. ;# .,7: ... . . . ...-l._
-.: #n n.j'; . .'r.
3 ' ;6 7';,'"'.'.'Q'_...,,;,.c ".,,.e.. *r.. .: .- ..1. l- . .:
} . . . . .
'/.....,,.- -';.. . , '
. Q. 4' , 8.,';i.- n' . .. 5 ..'d...,..-- 'I s ,9
- - v,-v
.~: ...
p*. ' -o-
, -. . . : . .,.: s' .' ..s--
. J..
. ;..). ,,n .. ; : .. ,....L,:....
c .. e 1 . . ,. ,n y. v. :
. . 'y- ;
- a. '. y.'. >n.,i......~
.. s -
s.3..,..-- :; ? . . . . , '..< .:
.~..%,.'... .
J
.: :; p , . . -
;1 w . ;', . '.e . : .: '. - . . . '. . e : . . ; - :r
.. ;. , .e . -
. :,s.g i s- .r
.;: < , -f ,
e,.
..,r.~',:
e :: , _; .. . . ; j. .s r_.,:.p4
;. . ;". '. ... - , . ,,e..<w .- l' .,-)8 . -v-
.y;:%,(. - . ..-a.
;,, .*..:i... .. : :...
l4 . - l.. , ;.:..:. . t ;."(. . . . ..;,..'
. , -s .
3
- . u. . .., . . . .
. .M-- , - * .
..e ~ o :
,'{:_; y . '".: Y. . ,
- p.s.:
.f. K.- '
.l'
^'
.. a-
..},, %$.) .,'., -]J ' -{ " , , - ' '
- l. .,. f l. v ; t'
"[. cyr[ !; , ,.',*
' ( r,'
- , .i '
;E. l ~
.l } Y., . . &.',),' ^r
') ' ,;., ' ,:, v - .:.
' . . ' i ):.. ,';b
;: , ;.*,.' W .::".' . D;nlf.[c .'.,:'.;..l h[;l '
...._,.~:.....;,..e..{s J ^
._..,'c. ...:' : l '. . -
.. . . . - , .c.=<- ?
s'.'.:.. .y *i ".. .9.t.e%. . -_.,.:r.......
-.: , i . .., ,. .. . . -
, .. 9,.: :p. . . . . > . .
.- - : .g u. .
- i ;.. . . ; . .
.. .s. ..
p
*.p.. . . e ;q *' - . . .* ',., ...~..;,:;;;, . . -,y,. ,; ,%, .:1.,:
.p. , .,'..,,_ *'.u- ..X'.:::.; ._ .,_..j..,- ,
.'.1 . _.*' . y.. _-
, ,. ~, ',.s ,s.
-l.t..'. ;. :,- ,- .' *
*.- . ,~ * .
** . ? ) ,. , . " , . ,l(3. . ,;,- y5; ;;. -
r'._....;,.-;',;.,'
. i: . - ;;
'*A .
j ,. :. . :
'.L
- . .) ' -; .- '
;~ :'.4** s;_* f.f .,', u .._ . '",.,~~--- ,
., ~ ,. ,,;c:: , ', ; -' ' .'!"
c,.,,, ; . y_.L,-..,< ,..-
, 1
,.. . ^;.:;: . ,., , .. ::,..: ; .. , ,..: . -:,..
....,,,,.4.*.:..,~~. .z. .v.-
. . e..<,..9~
. .:. * .. ;,..; - .-- -:. m .. ,',,.... ,-l,.v. , - p.2 .. - :..
?
..,':,'.r._;.. .,+w
, .. . . - . . . . . . 9,9 .rs n > . s- .- , :. u, .
y .). . . :.l *.. .m. ;'.,,C. '. : -
- a. , > y.~ S; *:: .... :
; s,
; h.',b ? .. , ' '~- " A' '[
h ' f ? ,.. ?f, }g .:: - . ..... .t. ._,. . ,. . ' ;, I, ^ A l,j? . .e , .q;S.N . !? ]' ;l.,,. . q.
':. f.'l. ?, '
'{ ; j '. .
g :.
. ,A. . .. . i :_ .
. 5 ,
I
... a
, ;&.y., 9.. :. :sl'?l ^
- . . - .. . . ..? ...'.1.,.+e.,.% .. :. .: ,,:-
...- -1
. - [.Nj.[;J.if[l ::;-[t',.;
~ i- . *. a,'.s,.I.,,. G :-. . ,. ; . .~
/.
...g. :
- y[. . ': f.:. , [ j ) :.N . ,. ' .: , . ... . ,;. ., ';s ' . '"
- " ., -[,d ,,;. /s I p ' . ".{. i.,i [.,i :.h_.y. n[n .i[' ,.l. l, i, [ -f? r
,:. % y. :k ;r e -
.e. . t . . . , , a. .i . ' . . ,
.' ;i.- '., '.,..c..,
c._.,.,.*..,,3. ,* -. .::.:.-.,b.,.a.-.l.. ..
. .t .
1'y;., .-,.=: ... :.i.y> . ,y; .,4 . . . .: n. : . . n
,, -.j,~..,,.* .3: ' g.i ,..:.. h t, s;.. ,._.... .e. .,e .7::,..-.,",7*,.....,.,,;.,;:..-...:.t_.;,....... . . , . . . . . .(
.e.,....*, ....,.
.s.
*" ' , . .~ 1;a ' 'r: -- _', W. . ,. s .'. '.
,, s . :
- ::,., ;;5 .- ; f
.- v: . ' '**
- *' .v. :,.*.t, ,.
. .- .- . . .v..
..i.* 3 Y., .id.,s, e. i' ..:'.
'^
.',,.3:
-1 s '. '.,' -?'..'u.,. ; . , ;
...'[,
,l .t
- _ . .. ; . , :_.,' .' ;*'.'"l+.s.~- '
' . , .:?;. . . . -
s.
.-6*s',.,. ':. . -
. y.
f..',:i,'.'h - [',u';. ,e
; .,1; g p, ' Y;:, . ,, ;,,. .y.;. .-
.) ; , I f t. .,;,*/s.t - . J .,*, .. R,
- * ,,. *[. . ;: : :,4'.f.l. ;; ' >^.i;. blg,;' ,; .. '{e.. ll . ,
; . , . ;, c ;.
-l.., .
r_ -j.^ .l't,' - 4 , . .'.[.:\ h. .f$g' ?Q -l[f;" ? * *y W. P, ..Q'.' y,, '. *,;,5. h';/,.. '. ;, , t .. : s.h. .f.,3,"y , , c:
' . " ;;. . . .. 3
. . . ;,,r9.'.' . '. , . ..'.I. I;. s '.,,' . .'.;[. ,},.* ;
. . ' ,' :. ;' .,' .$. ;. ,, 1; '; .
i, '. . ;t.-A y.;..', . {
*: . : . t, ^ . .
n
.,.~,1: ,,. .
d...*: >,,
,.3 ; . :
* .;+ ~ ~ , . . . *
.y.'.t....
' .], s., . . - *i, . . .y . 1--";; v sJAw;.;. _"*" .'.yi. l,.. . . ". . *.
- s,;. . . - . . . . ; . , . .,. *. ...l.' .t,; . . . ql,o ,,.,,.v.,.', : }
al , 4 s . ..'* . ...;,.,.,.,i..n. 2 .f
,y . ;'*, ; .. !. .f , . ;. . f..,...,,'f.c..u..-.-
. n;.._h,.-v
;. :. : P.3 .Va,*' ;, ;.c. .f. ..
#4 c f G'; _ ..g r -.;* . . ..
. ., ' . , .-. ..).'" .e.
. u. ;. . . . . , * .
- ?.
- jp q.yJ !;,..d;p'y ;l
,. - t' ..' >. '%
M... .., [4) ;. ..i p_ ._. ,h.',;.,:..%. t.'; . :: .4:i.:.._l;f ?t .4'.
* ,y[e *.f.. .l. ",; ; ; ,, : .
..=
~ . , _ . y. j . ? ,,: :li," . : f:'".l .','_.;. ;:. '*:.f. . ' :- : . ' .
.x . . . - ,+.t.
.a.
. .... o..4. ..;Y.,T . '.*. .,,). .., .;($ .> ; * .
- . .j"d 4 ::' ;. ; f. *y,2. ,g n. ...e;, : ;. ., y% * * :s ,: : :~ . e.:d:
, ,,. ..' .. .,c
. . .. . :: ., r -. ': ~ . . .-;..;.
_.. >: .,,; . .. .. . .s ,- -
,...:9. . . ;,;_ ,. :. ;. , t . . - l-~.y. 9.. . . /,:: -4.7.:, - . . c.a. . .. ?; ..:: : t . ." '. ' . . . ;8 ;. -
. . . , . c, . . , 4 '... .,.,-. .H 3 . , _ .
.n.. . ..
,..,C...
r 4,.s...; ;
..... .-4S, ,],,-- ^
- ,:. R:.t ; .:.;.
;;.; i;.:. *. . . . . .l,,iQ.].,.., .,e.,'..,
.c ;#,1 ;. )l, .4..;r; :;.:.;j :9;-:p.. _:f'; yl,, - y"ku' a..;f Q ' (; ,y*.,y Q'La?;i.;;( *.*;,.<.! z '; Q {',,
. a
,o ,4 ' ' '
. t
. ;.. ; .- - ..V--
- - ;. . .? '-.
- y,,. ).?. :: : ,,;.,5 ^
.) , , .'
t v
- r: _
..r. : ._: e
}; *] hh...,I, , ' k,
[ .
..H',, .. 3W, .' z...
.. .:, .'.4.t.
i * -
, f I ' :'. ,",,.Q*. '" '
. a . ,,, . ."i a . . .;.. _ .'; . .*: ; .I*.[
s .l f ; - - . t
; : n';.r.. l) -.:- .. 4..s ..*1.- .v . . ).';...;#;, . . , ,;- - . :.. '.- ' . . '
~e, <,;...... t .
- 9. *h . 3,,-g* \,l',1.,,
a x _ y, .:..'r .. _;. y \; '
--...,'Jn..At).,, y. s-, .,~, -Y_,
yV '*J_,., . s,f...;\, ,; . - .; .<< s , 4 y s .2 ;h ".
...'n, r
.,4'..~.'. % 4. . ' , .:.p: r- *' '
. . f.19?.fe,
- l'.?,Y.,. ,':[.\k .v . l I, . . !.l,f; ',.?.; !rk.. E? , ':. .'.k,,..'h,, > *. ,l;~ $ _ '}'q'.?;?i}o _! b.
s
';,Y. *f, .-.f' ;*'..? 0.g.'; ,~a.l*
....4 L :*
T
.7
,'.w*
- 9. . .;:
, .: . l 'l. 'y f El : :, b .. . ' .; ; .'
e,,. '. . ' . . .f. s
. . .;;. ,. .N. , .
. , 4.
' 5 'f ' y,, . .* . 'a. . 'i +
t~ s
,.,,d,t.,..,.. q.#. J f:.'.i 'fo.;.
- ;i.,{.k t.: . ,. ,, [. ( [,y '.l '. ' \ . ..'W *
.., . , .?4..h?[.4M.):,' ..; $h. f : % .'.t. t u u..v.r , .. C,O .'.,.:~
- . i:/ .,I,.fh'i,. , . q. ,.', 1, 3 ~.:. . . . A
..r,
.. :,%:;;.. e s .'gy,- %y, 's yt.n9 h.l,.:.y.. ;y
( s.g s , fe? :[. ( *:. j' ,' :s.. l.N.,f'-
%,W*r;w " N Yh. .l DaN. -['pp;j,Q. ...'.?:ly e us, 5,% .Q. ' ;* A. f,','-;,4.,R ::'<f l..:W.::p{?'Oh&l,;g i vf? * ,;. .;;ll% .q.,4 ;;, d ': ;C. 'i.o q.9 .).,:
5
*! } - ?.'.:.;s.,< A :. ..,. n. g,%. : . .., 5.
y-
- d ,,
%.,!f... ',$k . .M.l.* [%.* .*l: @g. t' ~
e
'f h . ' . ' '
Q.Q.$. -:.%k. %. ..?,R'*.h Yf.M* .k $s 4).Q:9.%): s h ::*m R: ..
@l ,!*:.&'. k.?$ %. )lt. yt ($lQl.@N._ ,!?@@f 4.".) '
- 6. N . :
W'f:!'".W',) I
- 4 .-
Q se r p n..>.,.4e,,<
."'o%.,:. l.Q,g
.?;:y>QT:.h' !:%';.ysp%q:';,,g. '.'.:y: ,yMg.9.%. . . ;;];/W ;. .'s,i,:.i.;4;&.,p,
&4 W ;
.. .1,*
te .'$.f2 . ;t,4 ;;,t=fr. : ;ik. ., :' ;f(1'.Q.
,e -
.i.*; * * \ .rpr r
. ...c."- ; .,.*r.*
,y. . r..,
,i N,si. . 9 , g *s. . . .q., . S._:q . - 5.>.;:
T; ? l gr .,Yg: .%;;.
.c.e.
a
,p. .. . . ;p: :
- . : :t ;
c.,.., '
. W; ,g . ..
- Q % . . . L * 't. . :: ~ 7 s.
. ::&'.n ; r;'.';,,..:.. . .
. ' y,. . . e, : e.; 9;l ._ '.*. , . .f . '. '
;*r y\ ... , . ., .,-
ts. :,%;7+ ,. ;: t f. .4.,<..?:';; .%;;..m
..s
.:q:.y.:. .'. .; . " ..~ ~
- .: p... . .:V: l g,,M.j >'p. . :3,: :C:: :1,rn ..rn<
~:
', yt.. . :.: : .:: T:.%..... m:.::"i . N. ., \;.. :: ;g:- ,.:. ,R; ,'r% . :< X ';4; .
...v ,. ;yn .s .:' .":i; - .u:::
. ~:,_ . f. :.- ;?;g';..D _ ..q .: .o
. . - f ,.
g p : ;.
- . ,. c. ._L.
... .: ;. '., +,.: > (. .. v .
; l :3 V: . ;; .t..;. g .... ) 'g g ) ;sf G :
".:).; p,.f .:.. ,. .. 3; t' !.:. : ,M ., .,. . . ;. %_ , .. .
, .e - -
.g_, . . .. k ,a p; .:.>, .y; . s,, .;:o . , y.r:,. .. . w; ,r.,
g.
'. f,1;;,'.flm-( . p _. . .
i;. v
- a. f.;,,' ;..l; ,. ,% . .,.
O-cy.,< ;. i;.. M' Q h'% b; '. ).!': .7;c h.R L: . . . . . : . q.s,b;. ;
'.!D. . , .' N.'N. ?' "$b f& . 0 ? $l! :
- Ul.~. ..'..:.:'.h N d.. lv::.'. ;?;:4 e ,, ; . .
' e.b ';! ' I.b.E
- D;;9l:?:4?.a:):.;*;i,4:% n .:ldjlg'3:; ;;;.o;4MN.6?fGQ h :.3 ?; ?lql? .
.d';; .
i
;j; ffkL
'J. ,.{. .Q. .n . G::.,. .:,3:; ::b, v.. .: p: W; q .%.. .. .. s...p. '.; z. ' :;..t. f: :
. v..*qv. . -. 5 ,u.n.t 4..'. ,:'.L.]:. ; '.q. .,v-.' . .^y:'
;a6...:> .. p.;~.. + ., . . .m . s:. . : .. . . .. ~
p.,,;; .;~. ...w(: y . 4 +* :;: M.s. ~. .r n . . ", ; . ~y' *
- 7. e.f.g .n:;. . i.p,;3 ,.9.%..,s.
;;.f.m : n
. ....;. ..,. ,. a; - .
; , , :; e. . ...a. + . - ;e -
.W:2,>; .b.. :
, r
- r. to.:
.. v,% '. . . ' ; / . 41..:.;n. : q.. 5 :s;...&.
^
. .:s,:hja%.d; g;.:l, ),: L :.:.*. .:.,. T .**,d'Y v.: W:,..qly:.
. . . a,;. , : :.q.f.:.m.g& ', - .
?g.T.Q~ 3.. n:.c ..:f'i q '. ;;'.Q,.' ':
'd: :. n
$.&?Q$$;4:f.ycA:
m ' y. ~: . ,: % ~L.T Q.;R Q,i :* i. f.
. k. d . % ':S.',h:f; n.s.;
o s;; J'. ... i ~ ;n;:: U- .n* .':.n.,:. . ,h ,p(:a.,. <
.a L
\.
.; -.v n, : . g* . .m: w.'s.
.s.<. 9. ? ,,: . . m,,. p?.:n t'a r y.;.c q<;,g:.%l:w '
'QkVQ.dif. .m.n tb
?,;4}f! .L
. . - . ,c'Nj . ..:.: hk W :Q W k }.k.ey$;ge .o
...'.'s? w,b ,& p'QbS W . ~j ...e., ,', N,'\,h ;:om..ml,?y u p k
. b :;
a%w.wm&W.$v$f. 7 . lc <. 9 v n pgw'$.#WW:s&es;hRhm&pll5Q ..,. h 'h".k[;1~{&;N:;{((m.W=:
#.n s .U.NOWf:N ;( .;&a. ,i. .a: 7 I k
.. E o h@. $W@ m;f.:$
%'i?W ~ # m . x.s. .
.airds.3
* ~
h.n. b w$w..f fy 4.e.:.h.&l}eg;k
- n. .v:.m.y .i .: .;,-.o '. , :.p w:q:; w,4.m q .:n. 4:y vi.q.4e n,;y;pw 6w n
.c . .,.., n%
W D :hlf.kk WW:f.Y:hkkpf .. .. .ffh aW A m & ^ h. hkh - v ty e M.M.R a M(r ! :py.hh$,hn%, u m& pl Q A M yp q %g' y $' h,;f.. . p#v
- gA e - N'.M.$ @;T IL / O ld'M' M M M D .[$Mk i ! '
. l l
AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET TDC: IDS: 1 S Form 58202G(5/94)[tNococwpf:1x] APc00 CENTRAL FILE USE ONLY: 0058.FRM RFS#: RFS ITEM #: AP600 DOCUMENT NO. REVISION NO. ASSIGNED TO OCS-GEH-023 o Page 1 of.1.2. ALTERNATE DOCUMENT NUMBER: WCAP-14690 WORK BREAKDOWN #: .Jees- 3. 3.1. 4. f , DESIGN AGENT ORGANIZATION: Westinghouse Electric Corporation jij% TITLE: Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 l l AlTA'CHMENTS: DCP #/REV. INCORPORATED IN THIS DOCUMENT REVISION: CALCULATION / ANALYSIS
REFERENCE:
ELECTRONIC FILENAME ELECTRONIC FILE FORMAT ELECTRONIC FILE DESCRIPTION M:\3063v.wpf:1b- Word Perfect 070296 (C) WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION 19.26, O WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 This document contains information proprietary to Westinghouse Electric Corporation; it is submitted in confidence and is to be used solely for the purpose for which it is fumished and retumed upon request. This document and such information is not to be reproduced, transmitted, disclosed er used otherwise in whole or in part without prior written authorization of Westinghouse Electric Corporation Energy Systems Business Unit. subject to the legends contained hereof. O WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2C This document is the property of and contains Proprietary information owned by Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its subcontractors and suppliers. It is transmitted to you in confidence and trust, and you agree to treat this document in strict accordance with the terms and condtions cf the agreement under which it was provided to you.
@ WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 (NON PROPRIETARY)
COMPLETE 1 IF WORK PERFORMED UNDER DESIGN CERTIFICATION-OR COMPLETE 2.lF WORK PERFORMED l UNDER FOAKE. l 1 @ DOE DESIGN CERTIFICATION PROGRAM - GOVERNMENT LIMITED RIGHTS STAf EMENT [See page 21 Copyright statement A license is reserved to the U.S. Gover'nrnent under contract DE-AC03-90SF18495.
@ DOE CONTRACT DELIVERABLES (DELIVERED DATA)
Subject to specified exceptions, disclosure of this data is restricted until September 30,1995 or Design Certification under DOE contract DE-ACO3-90SF18495, whichever is later. EPRI CONFIDENTIAL: NOTICE: 1 2 3 4 5 CATEGORY: A B CO D E F 2 O ARC FOAKE PROGRAM - ARC LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT ism page 21 Copyright statement: A license is reserved to the U.S. Govemment under contract DE-FCO2-NE34267 and subcontract ARC-93-3-SC-001. O ARC CONTRACT DELIVERABLES (CONTRACT DATA) Subject to specified exceptions, disclosure of this data is restricted under ARC Subcontract ARC-93-3-SC-001. ORIGINATOR SIGNATUR ATE S. P. Kerch AP600 RESPONSIBLE MANAGER Q StGNATURE*
'[
APPROVAL DAT E l l J. B. Reid _ g [M' 9jhM7g
-Approval of the responsible manager signifies that documtifft is corapidle, all reQJir6dreVleV'S are Complete, electronic file is attached and document is released for use.
I' AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET P ge 2 Form 58202G(S/94) LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENTS DOE GOVERNMENT UMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT l (A) These data are submitted with limited rights under govemment contract No. DE-AC03-90SF18495. These data may be reproduced and used by the govemment with the express limitation that they will not, without written permission of the contractor, be used for purposes of manufacturer nor disclosed outside the govemment; except that the govemment may disclose these data outside the gove nment for the following purposes, if any, provided that the govemment makes such disclosure subject to prohibiton against further use and disclosure: (1) This
- Proprietary Data' may be disclosed for evaluation purposes under the restrictions above.
(11) The ' Proprietary Data" may be disclosed to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), electric utility representatives and their direct consultants, excluding direct commercial competitors, and the DOE National Laboratories under the prohibitions and restrictions above. (B) This nonce shall be marked on any reproduction of *hese data, in whole or in part. ARC LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT: This proprietary data, fumished under Subcontract Number ARC 93-3-SC-001 with ARC may be duplicated and used by the govemment and ARC, subject to the limitations of Article H-17.F. of that subcontract, with the express limitations that the proprietary data may not be disclosed , outside the govemment or ARC, or ARC's Class 1 & 3 members or EPRI or be used for purposes of manufacture without prior permission of l the Subcontractor, except that further disclosure or use may be made solely for the following purposes: ! This proprietary data may be disclosed to other than commercial Competitors of Subcontractor for evaluation purposes of this subcontract under the restriction that the proprietary data be retained in confidence and not be further drsclosed, and subject to the terms of a non-disclosure i agreement between the Subcontractor and that organization, excluding DOE and its contractors. DEFINITIONS l CONTRACT /DEUVERED DATA - Consists of documents (e.g. specifications, drawings, reports) which are generated under the DOE or ARC contracts which contain no background proprietary data. EPRI CONFIDENTIALITY / ODLIGATION NOTICES NOTICE 1: The data in this document is subject to no confidentiality obligations. NOTICE 2: The data in this document is proprietary and confidential to Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its Contractors. It is forwarded to recipient under an obligation of Confidence and Trust for limited purposes only. Any use, disclosure to unauthorized persons, or copying of i this document or parts thereof is prohibited except as agreed to in advance by the Electric Power Research institute (EPRI) and Westin e Electric Corporation. Recipient of this data has a duty to inquire of EPRI and/or Westinghouse as to the uses of the informabon contai herein that are permitted. h NOTICE 3: The data in this document is proprietary and confidental to Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its Contractors. It is forwarded l to recipient under an obligation of Confidence and Trust for use only in evaluation tasks specifically authorized by the Electnc Power Research j institute (EPRI). Any use, disclosure to unauthortzed persons, or copying this document or parts thereof is prohibited except as agreed to in advance by EPRI and Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Recipient of this data has a duty to inquire of EPRI and/or Westinghouse as to the l uses of the information contained herein that are permitted. This document and any copies or excerpts thereof that may have been generated 1 are to be retumed to Westinghouse, directly or through EPRI, when requested to do so. NOTICE 4: The data in this document is proprietary and confidential to Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its Contractors. It is being revealed in confidence and trust only to Employees of EPRI and to certain contractors of EPRI for limited evaluation tasks authorized by EPRI. Any use, disclosure to unauthorized persons, or copying of this document or parts thereof is prohibited. This Document and any copies or excerpts thereof that may have been generated are to be retumed to Westinghouse, directly or through EPRI, when requested to do so. l 1 NOTICE 5: The data in this document is propnetary and confidential to Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its Contractors. Access to ; this data is given In Confidence and Trust only at Westinghouse facilities for lirnited evaluation tasks assigned by EPRt. Any use, disclosure 1 to unauthonzed persons, or copying of this document or parts thereof is prohibited. Neither this document nor any excerpts therefrom are to i be removed from Westinghouse facilities. EPRI CONFIDENTIALITY / OBLIGATION CATEGORIES CATEGORY "A"-(See Delivered Data) Consists of CONTRACTOR Foreground Data that is contained in an issued reported. ! CATEGORY "B"-(See Delivered Data) Consists of CONTRACTOR Foreground Data that is not contained in an issued report, except for computer programs. CATEGORY "C" - Consists of CONTRACTOR Background Data except for computer programs. CATEGORY *D* - Consists of computer programs developed in the course of performing the Work. CATEGORY *E' - Consists of computer programs developed prior to the Effective Date or after the Effective Date but outside the scope of the Work. CATEGORY *F"- Consists of administrative plans and administrative reports. i l
eog, WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 WCAP-14690 Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 Steve Kerch June 1996 Approved: d - R. M. Vijuk, Project M ger, AP600 Design Certifi tion Westinghouse Electric Corporation P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15230 4355 C 1996 Westinghouse Electric Corporation All Rights Reserved m:\3063w.wpf:1b@0996
. -. .. . ~ . . _ . _ _ . - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ - . . _ _ _ _
iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ;
1.0 INTRODUCTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 l
2.0 PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 l 3.0 COMPUTERIZED PLANT PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 i 4.0 DEVELOPMENT OF THE EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . 4-1 i 5.0 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF THE COMPUTERIZED PIANT PROCEDURES . . . 5-1 5.1 Computerized Procedures System Introduction / Background . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.2 Mission of Computenzed Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2 5.3 Computerized Procedures System Verification and Validation . . . . . . . . . 5-3 -
6.0 REFERENCES
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 .
i r i o i l t i l \ l i 4 Designer's input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:1bM/0296 _ _ __ _ __ _ 1_.__-__ -
iv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS COL Combined License CPS Computerized Procedure System EOP Emergency Operating Procedure ERG Emergency Response Guidelines HFE Human Factors Engineering ' HRA Human Reliability Analysis i LOCA Loss-of-Coolant-Accident MCR Main Control Room MMI Man-Machine Interface PRA Probabilistic Risk Assessment PWR Pressurtzed Water Reactor SSAR Standard Safety Analysis Report SSC Structures, Systems, and Components l l l l I l l Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wphit>WO296 i.
1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Plant procedures are developed and used by the plant staff so that startup, routine, nonroutine, and emergency activities are conducted in a safe manner. Activities affecting safety-related structures, systems, and components (SSCs) are performed by following detailed and approved plant procedures. As stated in the AP600 Standard Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) subsection 13.5, procedure development is a Combined License (COL) applicant responsibility. COL applicants referencing the AP600 certified design, will address plant procedures including normal operation, abnormal operation, emergency operation, alarm response, mamtenance, inspection, test, surveillance, and administrative procedures. This document provides input from the designer to the AP600 COL applicant on the development of plant procedures. Also included in this document is information on the development and design of the AP600 emergency response guidelines (ERGS), and information on the computenzed procedure system (CPS). The CPS is the human system interface that allows operators to execute the plant procedures.
)
1 l l 1 l i Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:1bCO296
2-1 2.0 PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT An implementation plan for the development of plant operating procedures should be developed and executed by the COL applicant. This plan should be created to guide the I development of the plant operating procedures and to specify the process by which the plant operating procedures will be verified, validated, and maintained. The scope of the plan should include the applicable operating procedures specified in the previous section. The plan should specify that plant operating procedures follow standard formats implemented through a writer's guide. The plan should also include the need to document the plant operating procedures' technical bases. The implementation plan should do the following: Specify le process by which plant operating procedures are developed, verified, validated, and mamtained Include the applicable operating procedures listed in Section 1.0 State that plant operating procedures follow guidance provided by the writer's guide Specify that the plant operating procedures' technical bases be documented and shall be consistent with plant design basis material, task analysis, Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), and output from the human reliability analysis (HRA)/ human factors engineering (HFE) integration plan Specify that the plant operating procedures be developed using the accepted industry standards, guidelines, and practices. A list of documents to be used as guidance is provided in Section 6.0 as References 1 through 12. i {' l i Designer's Input to Precedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:HMr10296
3-1 3.0 COMPUTERIZED PLANT PROCEDURES The AP600 man-machine interface (MMI) (human system interface) is designed to provide a CPS for the presentation of plant procedures to the operating staff. The CPS is one of the human system interface systems of the AP600 main control room (MCR). The AP600 SSAR subsection 18.8 lists the interface systems and describes the design implementation plan for them. The human system interface design implementation plan includes functional design documentation, HFE design guidelines, Man-in-the-Loop concept testing, design specifications, full-scale mockup of the MCR, design reviews, and the implementation of the hardware and associated software designs. The CPS is accessible from each operator workstation in the MCR. Design options, including a paper backup, are being explored to determine the operator's course of action in the unlikely event of a loss of the CPS on the workstations. A procedure writer's guide is developed as part of the human system interface design implementation plan for the CPS. SSAR subsection 18.8 describes the design implementation plan for the AP600 human system interface. The writer's guide establishes the process for developing procedures. The guide is used for procedures within the scope of this design element so that the procedures developed are consistent in organization, style, and content. The writer's guide provides instructions for procedural content and format, including the specification of acceptable acronym lists and acceptable terms to be used. The content of the procedures incorporates the following elements: . Title
' Statement of purpose and applicability
. References Prerequisites Precautions (including warnings, cautions, and notes) Limitations and actions j . Required human actions ' Acceptance criteria . Checkoff lists The procedure development guidelines include: Determination of the parallel information to be monitored by the CPS Guidance on actions that may be initiated, but need not be completed prior to leaving the step, or may be completed at a later time. Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:ll>471896
3-2' Determination of the priority of parallel information (for example, cautions, notes, ! foldout page items, and critical safety functions). l Determination of the parameters that need to be continuously monitored. t l Determination of the frequency at which each parallel information item should be l checked by the computer. i Laydown areas are available in the control room and outside the control room for paper ; documents to be used. ! The COL applicant is responsible for developing the administrative procedures to ensure that l the computer-based procedure database is available only to authorized personnel. l l l l l i l l ! Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 mA3063w.wpt:n>c70296
4-1 4.0 DEVELOPMENT OF THE EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES The emergency operating procedures (EOPs) for the AP600 define the actions to be taken by the plant operating staff for the prevention or mitigation of the consequences of emergency conditions. These procedures include automatic actions that occur in the event of an emergency, operator actions to help prevent or mitigate the consequences of an emergency, and operator actions to stabilize the plant condition. EOPs provide a conservative course of action for the operator and are flexible enough to accommodate variations. The use of EOPs that encompass both optimal recovery and function restoration guidance enhances human reliability and decreases adverse results for a broad range of initiating events and subsequent multiple failures or operator errors. These EOPs are developed from a set of ERGS. The EOP development process for the AP600 is based on the same accepted and established process used by utilities with Westinghouse pressurized water reactors (PWRs). For the AP600, the Westinghouse Owners Group generic ERGS are modified and adapted to the specific plant configuration of the AP600 (Ref.13, AP600 Document No. GW-GJR-100 provides the AP600-specific ERGS). Plant specific EOPs should be written using the criteria and process described below: The AP600 EOPs should meet the guidelines of NUREGs 0899 (Ref.14), 0737 Supplement 1 (Ref.15), and 1358 (Ref.16). The AP600 EOPs should be based on two primary elements. The technical content, should be developed from the AP600 ERGS, along with additional sources of information such as design characteristics, transient and accident analysis, engineering judgment, task analysis, and operating experience. The AP600 ERGS should be a translation of engineermg data derived from operating experience and transient and accidat analysis into information presented in such a way that it can be used to write EOPs.
=
The EOPs should follow the principles defined in the AP600 procedure writer's guide. The procedure writer's guide provides confidence in consistent production of high-quality EOPs. The use of a procedure writer's guide provides for the integration of human factors principles when converting technical guidelines into an acceptable EOP , format. I The procedure writer's guide contains the necessary information and guidance for translating the AP600 ERGS into AP600 EOPs. Using a procedure writer's guide Designer's input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:1b-071896
! 4-2' , 1 1 provides confidence that the EOPs are usable, accurate, complete, readable, convenient to use, and acceptable to MCR personnel. l j Emergency operating circumstances involve some degree of stress and/or degraded environmental conditions unique to that situation. The AP600 procedure writer's l~ guide addresses the goals, requirements, and recommendations identified in the ; writer's guide section of NUREG-0899 (Ref.14). l The process of translating the AP600 ERGS into action steps that make up the EOPs is i the responsibility of the procedure writer. The AP600 ERGS identify the plant objectives to be met, the systems and subsystems required, the situations requiring . l operator action, and the order in which the actions should be carried out. It is the ! l task of the procedure writer to extract the relevant information, and to carry out any additional function, task, or technical analysis required to provide the EOPs. . Operating experience and information contained in the procedure writer's guide should be used throughout this process so that the EOPs are written in a form that ' i ' optimizes operator performance. As the sequence and relationships among action
. steps are developed, the technical guidelines are followed by the EOP writers. The AP600 EOP development process should be iterative and should usually begm at a system level, and become more specific at the subsystem and the component levels. !
! Dunng this iterative process, the specific operator tasks are identified and written in , the form of action steps. : The orientation of the AP600 EOPs parallels that of the AP600 ERGS and are k symptom-based, with provisions for specific event-based actions (optimal recovery procedures such as loss-of-coolant-accident (LOCA), steam generator tube rupture, l secondary break). Symptom-based EOPs, encompassing both optimal recovery and ( function restoration guidance, provide the operator with guidance on how to verify l the adequacy of safety functions and how to restore and maintain those functions > ! when they are degraded. The analysis of functions and tasks used in the development of AP600 EOPs is t provided by the AP600 ERGS. This information provides the initial cut at identifymg functions, their associated hardware systems, the actions that are taken (by man and , machine), and the circumstances under which they are taken. ' The AP600 EOPs are verified and validated on the AP600 simulator as part of the integrated system validation activity of the AP600 HFE verification and validation (Ref.17, I l Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 l m:\3063w.wpf:1MT71896 I I i __. -_ - _
i 4-3 l WCAP-14401, " Programmatic Level Description of the Human Factors Engineering Verification and Validation"). This process addresses the following objectives:
- 1. The EOPs are written in accordance with the respective AP600 writer's guide.
- 2. The EOPs are usable. (They can be understood and followed without confusion, delays, errors.)
- 3. There is a correspondence between the EOPs and the MCR/ plant hardware (controls, equipment, indications) that becomes a reference for use both inside and outside of the MCR. EOPs use the same designations, the same units of measurement, and I operate consistently with the plant hardware.
- 4. The language and level of information presented in the EOPs are compatible with the !
number, qualifications, training, and experience of the operating staff.
- 5. There is a high level of confidence that the EOPs guide the operator in mitigating transients and accidents.
l EOP discrepancies found during the verification / validation process are corrected. i Reference 17, WCAP-14401 provides a programmatic level description of the AP600 HFE I verification and validation, which includes EOP verification and validation as part of the , integrated system validation activity. I 1 I l 1 l j i r Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:1t>&O296
r 5-1 5.0 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF THE COMPUTERIZED PLANT PROCEDURES i The functional design of the CPS uses a systems engineering approach wherein high-level requirements for the system are first defined. This is followed by successively more detailed requirements. Engineering expertise in plant procedures and MMI design is employed. The design of the system is enhanced by a Design Review and by discussions with plant sperating personnel. SSAR subsection 18.8 describes the design implementation plan for the AP600 human system interfaces. Man-in-the-Loop concept tests are planned as part of the human system interface design implementation plan. At least two tests are planned for the CPS. Concept tests six and seven of WCAP-14396, " Man-in-the-Loop Test Plan Description" (Ref.18), test the CPS and the coordination of computerized procedures with workstation displays and soft controls. One of the objectives of these tests is to determine how effectively computerized i procedures handle difficult situations and determme whether computer-based procedures adequately support operator performance. Another objective is to determine whether l computerized procedures introduce new difficulties not found in current paper-based procedures. Difficulties discovered are evaluated and resolved as part of the iterative design process. l Design optiors are being explored to determine the operator's course of action in the unlikely l event of a loss of the CPS on all workstations. These options include the use of a paper backup system. The maintenance and control of the backup system is developed as part of i the human system interface design process. The acceptability of the backup is evaluated through concept testing or by executing a walk-through, using the full-scale mockup of the AP600 MCR. The backup is also evaluated as part of the integrated system validation by l including test scenarios that examine the use of the backup following the simulated loss of the CPS (Ref.17, WCAP-14401, " Programmatic Level Description of the AP600 Human l Factors Verification and Validation Plan"). The ERGS and the procedure writer's guide identify the content and format of the EOPs. This content and format is the basis for the type of information presented in the computer-based representation of the EOPs. j 5.1 COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURES SYSTEM INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND In most complex situations, active human response is guided by individual experience, trainmg, and procedures. The individual's response is knowledge-based when the response is directed by applying knowledge obtained through formal training and derived from the Designer's input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:1tMr71896
l l l 1 i 5 . individual's own experience. The individual's response is rule-based when the response follows an established set of procedures, and is supported by training in applying and using those procedures. The relative proportions of knowledge-based responses and rule-based responses varies from one situation to the next, and from individual to individual. Normal and emergency plant procedures are developed by experienced specialists. The l procedures guide the user along a recommended course of action, aid in the detection of i anomalous conditions, and recommend changes in the normal course of action in dealing with these anomalies. The functions involved in generating rule-based responses consist of the following: l
=
l Collecting specified data Processing that data through a prespecified train of logic Recognizing the action recommended by the course taken
=
l Executing that action The functions involved in generating responses are as amenable to computer application as to
' human application. Rule-based responses (but not necessarily execution of the resultant recommended actions) generated by a programmed computer may actually be preferable to responses generated by a human operator for the following reasons:
First, the likelihood of error in computer-generated responses is significantly smaller than in human-generated responses, provided the basic procedures are well formulated. Second, the operator confronted with the situation can be freed from the noncognitive component of the response-generating activity. The individual can concentrate on applying his knowledge to comprehending the situation, detecting anomalous conditions, and determining appropriate courses of action. Lastly, the computer can provide an independent verification of the course of action chosen by the human operator before executing action steps. The goal of the CPS is to transfer to the computer the rule-Sased functions at which it excels. 5.2 MISSION OF COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURES { 1 ! The mission of the CPS is to assist power plant operators in monitoring and controlling the j execution of plant procedures. i Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf-lb-W0296
5-3 The CPS is a software system. It runs on the haidwarc .clected for the operations control centers. As long as memory, disk, and processing requirements are satisfactory, the system does not dictate specific hardware requirements. The CPS inc.. ides an off-line tool that is used to modify, update, or edit the procedures. This is accomplished by using a database management system that stores the procedural steps. The off-line tool allows access only to the CPS database. The admmistrative procedures controlling the security of the off-line tool and the procedural database are the responsibility of the COL applicant. The physical means by which operators access and use the CPS and its backup is evaluated as part of the human system interface design process. SSAR subsection 18.8 presents a l description of the implementation plan for the human system interface design. This plan j includes Man-in-the-Loop concept testing (Ref.18, WCAP-14396), design reviews, and construction of a full-scale mockup. The concept tests for the CPS test the usability of the system and the coordination of computerized procedures with workstation displays and soft controls. The MCR mockup is used to verify physicallayout aspects such as availability and adequacy of workspace and laydown areas, physical access, visibility, and related anthropometric and human factors issues. The mockup is also used for walk-through exercises to examine issues such as staffing levels, task allocation, and the use of computenzed procedures and their backup. 5.3 COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURES SYSTEM VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION The verification and validation of the operating procedures on the AP600 simulator as a part of the validation of the integrated human system interface provides confidence that the CPS meets its design goals and that unresolved human engineering issues are addressed. Ref.17, WCAP-14401, provides a programmatic level description of the AP600 HFE verification and validation which includes computerized plant procedures. Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:1b471896
6-1
6.0 REFERENCES
- 1. NUREG-0800, " Standard Review Plan," Rev.1,1984
- 2. NUREG-0899, " Guidelines For The Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures,"
1982
- 3. NUREG-1358, " Lessons learned From The Special Inspection Program For Emergency Operating Procedures," 1989
- 4. NUREG-1358, " Lessons Learned From The Special Inspection Program For Emergency Operating Procedures," Supplement 1,1989 e
- 5. NUREG/CR-5228, " Techniques For Preparing Flowchart Format Emergency Operating
~ Procedures," Volumes 1 and 2,1989 I
- 6. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.33 (Rev. 2), " Quality Assurance Program Requirements,"
j 1978
- 7. ANS 3.2-1988, "Admuustrative Controls and QA For The Operational Phase of NPPs,"
1988
- 8. Code of Federal Regulations, Energy,10 CFR 50.34 (F) (2) (ii),1993
- 9. NUREG-0737," Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements," 1980
- 10. NUREG-0737, Supplement 1, " Requirements For Emergency Response Capability,"
1982
- 11. WCAP-14401, " Programmatic level Description of the AP600 Human Factors Verification and Validation Plan," April 1996
- 12. NUREG-0933, "A Prioritization of Generic Safety Issues," 1983
- 13. AP600 Emergency Response Guidelines, GW-GJR-100, Rev. O, May 31,1995 4
- 14. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1982A, " Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures," NUREG-0899 (Washington, DC, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
Designer's Input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf lb470296 l
6-2*
- 15. US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1980, " Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements," NUREG-0737 (Washington, DC, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
- 16. US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1989B, " Lessons Learned from the Special Inspection Program for Emergency Operating Procedures," NUREG-1358 (Washington, DC, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission)
- 17. Programmatic Level Description of the AP600 Human Factors Engineering Verification and Validation Plan, WCAP-14401, April 13,1995
- 18. Man-in-the-Loop Test Plan Description, WCAP-143%, April 1996 Designer's input to Procedure Development for the AP600 June 1996 m:\3063w.wpf:1b471896}}