ML20117C843
| ML20117C843 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 08/21/1996 |
| From: | Mckoy C GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| LCV-0870, LCV-870, NUDOCS 9608280074 | |
| Download: ML20117C843 (5) | |
Text
.
Georgia Power Company 40 Inverress Center Parkway 1
Post Ottre Box 1295
)
Dirmingham, Alabama 35201 Telephone 205 877 7122 Georgia Pon>er C. K. McCoy Vice Presdent. Nuclear Vogtle Protect ste southern electrc system August 21, 1996 Docket Nos. 50-424 LCV- 0870 50-425 l
i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk j
Washington, DC 20555 Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Fitness For Duty Performance Data Gentlemen:
Georgia Power Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six-month reporting period, January 1996 through June 1996, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). The data is summarized in the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, N
C. K. McCoy /
CKM/JMG : FFD Performance Data Sheets : Vogtle FFD Program Summary I
l cc: (see next page) l}v2l 270150 9608280074 960821 PDR ADOCK 05000424 R
'l 1
GeorgiaPower d U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2
-j xc: Georgia Power Company
. Mr. J. B. Beasley, Jr.
i-Mr. M. Sheibani NORMS U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator Mr. L. L. Wheeler, Licensing Project Manager, NRR Mr. C. R. Ogle, Senior Resident Inspector - Vogtle i
LCV-0870 File: J.03
ENCLOSURE I Page 1 of 2 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Georgia Power Company 6/30/96 ca"**v s unnes Energ Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Waynesboro, GA Leoneen Vince Agro (205) 992-5094 cona Nan.
Pnene oncame wee case)
Cut:fis: ScreerVConfirmation (ng/ml)
@ Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Mirijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencycfdine
/
/
Oplates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number witt Unescorted Access 950 204 188 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positke Pre 9u: cess 33 0
12 0
831 10
(
Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 el Observed behavior 7
0 0
0 1
0 Random 265 0
49 0
43 0
Fcilow up 22 0
0 0
28 0
Other Safety & Health, rtw 3
0 1
0 0
0 T;tal 330 0
62 0
903 10 Dev 1/Q7
I e
~
e
~
< o N
M N
d 87 N
e W
o o
o H
l g j o
e jl o
o e
o
} }{
o o
o o
aj j o
e o
o j
1 o
o o
n m
E
} f f
1 w
} i l l
l
~
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Fitness For Duty Program Summary The data generated under the Fitness For Duty (FFD) program from January 1996 through June 1996 has been reviewed and analyzed -
The random pool contains not only those badges for unescorted access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. Contractors without approved programs are included in the testing pool while on site. Testing during this time period was performed on a nominal
)
weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends, and holidays. During this testing period, 1
the rate of testing was equal to 50% yearly of the total population.
In summarizing management actions associated with the FFD program, it should be emphasized that the incidents of confirming positive tests were very low. Consequently, management actions relative to determination of FFD have been limited. Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken.
There were no management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period. Monthly quality control checks of the Fitness for Duty random pool revealed no major discrepancies from January through June.
As a pro-active measure, in April 1996, management instituted an enhancement to the arrest reporting requirement. Employees reporting a substance abuse related arrest will submit to for-cause fitness for duty testing and be referred for Employee Assistance evaluation by a mental health professional to determine if there is a substance abuse or other problem. To date, four licensee employees have been referred for evaluation and underwent either a rehabilitation or educational program.
1 i
!