Similar Documents at Perry |
---|
Category:EXHIBITS (DOCKETING AND SERVICES BRANCH INFORMATION
MONTHYEARML20116N9731985-04-0909 April 1985 Staff Exhibit S-5,consisting of Bnwl Feb 1985 Technical Evaluation Rept PNL-5411, Review of Operability & Reliability of Tdi Diesel Generators at Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 ML20116N9661985-04-0909 April 1985 Staff Exhibit S-4,consisting of Undated Bnwl Slide Presentation, Summary of Conclusions & Recommendations on Resolution of Known Problems in Tdi Generator Components (Phase 1 of Owners Group Program) ML20116N9471985-04-0909 April 1985 Applicant Exhibit A-16-1,consisting of Table 8.3-1, Connected,Automatic & Manual Loading & Unloading of Efs Switchgear, ML20116N9431985-04-0909 April 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-OCRE-11,consisting of R Ridenhour 850330 Article, Rush to License:Money Vs Safety, Appearing in Gambit Weekly Newspaper ML20116N9371985-04-0909 April 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-OCRE-8,consisting of Tdi 850318 Part 21 Rept Re Potential Defect in Oil Plugs in Crankshaft of Standby Diesel Generator Dsr or DSRV-16.List of Affected Sites,Including Shoreham & Perry Plants,Provided ML20116N9311985-04-0909 April 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-OCRE-5,consisting of Undated Summary of Tdi Diesel Generator Owners Group 840711 Meeting W/Nrc & Bnwl Re Encl Bnwl Rept Concerning Owners Group Program Plan. W/O Encl ML20116N9291985-04-0909 April 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-OCRE-4,consisting of Portions of Applicant 840308 Answers to Ocre 11th Set of Interrogatories Re Issue 16 Concerning Tdi Diesel Generators.Affidavit of EC Christiansen Encl ML20116N9261985-04-0909 April 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-OCRE-2,consisting of 850110 Summary of Tdi Owners Group 850109 Executive Committee Meeting in Dallas,Tx Re Status & Schedule of Phase I & II Effort. Proposal for Closure of Group Encl ML20116N9201985-04-0909 April 1985 Intervenor Exhibit I-OCRE-1,consisting of Forwarding Mfg Audit for 820223-25.Deficiencies Found During Audit Noted in Rept.Tdi Approved Suppliers List Procedure Encl 1985-04-09
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212J1581999-09-30030 September 1999 Order Approving Transfer of License & Conforming Agreement. Orders That License Transfer Approved,Subj to Listed Conditions ML20205D4901999-02-22022 February 1999 Transcript of 990222 Informal Public Hearing on 10CFR2.206 Petition in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-105.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20196J5261998-12-0202 December 1998 Order,Approving Application Re Transfer of Operating Authority.Commission Consents to Transfer of License as Described to Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Co ML20198D9711998-11-0909 November 1998 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting That Facility Be Immediately Shut Down & OL Be Suspended or Modified Until Such Time That Facility Design & Licensing Bases Properly Updated to Permit Operation with Failed Fuel Assemblies ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20236V5261998-07-20020 July 1998 Computer Access & Operating Agreement Between Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co & NRC PY-CEI-NRR-2284, Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1998-05-21021 May 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal ML20216B5111998-04-0909 April 1998 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty.Denies Request for Remission of Violation C,Ea 97-430 & Orders Licensee to Pay Civil Penalty in Amount of $50,000 within Next 30 Days PY-CEI-NRR-2269, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.NRC Should Demonstrate That Not Only Is Code Process Flawed,But That Proposed Change Justified from Cost Versus Safety Protective1998-04-0303 April 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.NRC Should Demonstrate That Not Only Is Code Process Flawed,But That Proposed Change Justified from Cost Versus Safety Protective ML20216G3821998-03-11011 March 1998 Order Approving Application Re Merger Agreement Between Duquesne Light Co & Allegheny Power Systems,Inc ML20217J0661998-03-11011 March 1998 Order Approving Application Re Merger Agreement Between Dqe, Inc & Allegheny Power System,Inc ML20198P9311997-11-0707 November 1997 Comments of American Municipal Power-Ohio,Inc.NRC Should Require Allegheny Power Sys,Inc to Affirm That Capco Antitrust License Conditions Will Be Followed ML20134L3401997-01-22022 January 1997 Resolution 96-R-85, Resolution Supporting Merger of Centerior Energy Corp & Ohio Edison Under New Holding Co Called Firstenergy ML20133B6941996-12-18018 December 1996 Submits Ordinance 850-96 Re Approval of Merger of Centerior & Oh Edison Into Firstenergy ML20135F4731996-12-0606 December 1996 Memorandum & Order CLI-96-13.* Commission Reverses & Vacates ASLB LBP-95-17 Which Granted Motion for Summary Disposition Submitted by Ocre & Hiatt.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 961206 ML20132A8461996-12-0202 December 1996 Resolution 20-1996 Supporting Merger of Ohio Edison & Centerior Corp Under New Holding Company Called Firstenergy ML20134M6191996-10-28028 October 1996 Proclamation of Support by City of Sandusky,Oh Re Merger of Ohio Edison and Centerior Energy Corp ML20112J8281996-06-18018 June 1996 Licensee Reply Brief on Review of Licensing Board Decision LBP-95-17.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20112D8721996-05-29029 May 1996 Intervenor Brief in Support of Commission Affirmation of LBP-95-17.* Commission Should Affirm Licensing Board Decision.W/Certificate of Svc ML20108D9571996-05-0303 May 1996 CEI Response to City of Cleveland 2.206 Petition.Nrc Should Deny Petition ML20108B7571996-04-26026 April 1996 Licensee Brief on Review of Licensing Board Decision LBP-95-17.* Recommends That Commission Reverse Board Memorandum & Order Issued 951004.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List PY-CEI-NRR-2034, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl1996-03-11011 March 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Reporting Requirements for Unauthorized Use of Licensed Radioactive Matl ML20101B5841996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement Or,In Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures.W/Certificate of Svc ML20097B8721996-01-23023 January 1996 Petition of City of Cleveland,Oh for Expedited Issuance of Nov,Enforcement of License Conditions & Imposition of Appropriate Fines,Per 10CFR2.201,2.202,2.205 & 2.206 ML20097B8911996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement or in Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures ML20096E2471996-01-0303 January 1996 Comment on PRM 50-64 Re Stockpiling Ki for Use as Thyroid Protectant in Event of Nuclear Accident.Supports Distribution of Ki to Public ML20095K3491995-12-20020 December 1995 Order Approving Transfer of License for Perry Nuclear Power Plant to Newly Formed Wholly Owned Subsidiary,Oes Nuclear Inc ML20100Q6431995-12-0404 December 1995 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option a Re Leak Rate Testing ML20094N1951995-11-17017 November 1995 Oh Edison Application for License Transfer in Connection W/ Sale & Related Transactions ML20094M5941995-11-15015 November 1995 Intervenors Answer to Licensees Petition for Review.* Intervenor Conclude That Commission Should Not Review Board Decision.W/Certificate of Svc ML20094J9141995-11-0707 November 1995 Petition for Review.* Submits That Commission Review of Board Decision Appropriate Under 10CFR2.786. W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20093N9491995-10-23023 October 1995 Licensee Request for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review.* Requests That Commission Grant Extension Until 951107 of Deadline for Filing Petition for Review. W/Certificate of Svc ML20073F2731994-09-26026 September 1994 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements ML20065L3571994-04-0505 April 1994 Intervenors Answer to NRC Staff Response to Intervenors Motion for Summary Disposition & Licensees Cross Motion for Summary Disposition.* Urges Board to Deny Licensee Cross Motion.W/Certificate of Svc ML20064N6341994-03-21021 March 1994 Affidavit of RW Schrauder in Support of Licensee Cross Motion for Summary Disposition & Answer to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy,Inc & SL Hiatt Motion for Summary Disposition.W/Certificate of Svc ML20064N6081994-03-21021 March 1994 Licensee Cross Motion for Summary Disposition & Answer to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy,Inc & SL Hiatt Motion for Summary Disposition.* Moves for Decision in Licensee Favor on Ocre Contention ML20064N9201994-03-21021 March 1994 Affidavit of RW Schrauder in Support of Licensee Cross Motion for Summary Disposition & Answer to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy,Inc & SL Hiatt Motion for Summary Disposition. W/Svc List ML20063L4621994-02-0707 February 1994 Motion for Summary Disposition.* Intervenors Request That Board Grant Summary Disposition Favorably & Issue Declaratory Relief by Finding Challenged Portion of Amend 45 to Be in Violation of Aea.W/Certificate of Svc ML20058P4451993-12-13013 December 1993 Licensee Answer to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy,Inc & SL Hiatt Supplemental Petition for Leave to Intervene.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20059L9391993-11-12012 November 1993 Petitioners Supplemental Petition for Leave to Intervene.* Court Held That NRC May Not Eliminate Public Participation on Matl Issue in Interest of Making Process More Efficient. W/Certificate of Svc ML20059B1421993-10-19019 October 1993 Order.* Petitioners Shall File Supplemental Petition in Accordance W/Schedule in 931018 Order.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 931020 ML20059B1761993-10-18018 October 1993 Order.* Informs That for Each Contention,Petitioners Shall Comply Fully W/Requirements of 10CFR2.714(b)(2)(i),(ii) & (III) & Their Filing Should Address Requirements Set Forth in Regulations.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931019 ML20059B0701993-10-12012 October 1993 Motion to Defer Consideration of Remanded Issue.* Requests That Licensing Board Defer Consideration of Remanded Issue Pending Outcome of Commission Review of 2.206 Process.W/ Certificate of Svc ML20058M8761993-09-30030 September 1993 Memorandum & Order CLI-93-21.* Appeal for Hearing Re Amend to Plant OL Denied.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930930 ML20057C0461993-09-21021 September 1993 Supplemental Directors Decision DD-93-15 Involving 920929 Request for Certain Actions to Be Taken Re Proposed Construction of Interim onsite,low-level Radioactive Waste Facility at Plant.Request Denied ML20046C5521993-08-0404 August 1993 Memorandum.* Informs Parties That Time Provided by Commission Regulations to Act on Pending Petitions for Review of Board Order LBP-92-32 Expired.Petitions,Therefore, Deemed Denied.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930804 ML20056C8951993-07-19019 July 1993 Order Extending Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of LBP-92-32.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 930720 ML20045D7321993-06-25025 June 1993 Order.* Advises That Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of ASLB Order LBP-92-32,dtd 921118, Extended Until 930720.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 930625 PY-CEI-NRR-1659, Comment Re Proposed Generic Communication on Mod of TS Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans,As Published in Fr on 930401 (58FR17293).Believes Concept of Technical Review Not Addressed by STS1993-06-0707 June 1993 Comment Re Proposed Generic Communication on Mod of TS Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans,As Published in Fr on 930401 (58FR17293).Believes Concept of Technical Review Not Addressed by STS ML20044F7651993-05-26026 May 1993 Order.* Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of Board Order LBP-92-32,dtd 921118,hereby Extended Until 930625.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930526 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
m Y
- 7.. -.
./
a::c. 6 - l'a-March 8, 1984
%J UNITED STATES OF Av. ERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
(.
Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 4
In the Matter of
)
)
THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC
)
Docket Nos. 50-440 ILLUMINATING COMPANY, ET AL.
)
50-441
)
(Perry Nuclear Power Plant,
)
Units 1 and 2)-
)
i f
f APPLICANTS' ANSWERS TO OHIO CITIZENS FOR
/
RESPONSIBLE ENERGY ELEVENTH SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO APPLICANTS RELATING TO ISSUE NO. 16
[
Applicants for their answers to Ohio Citizens for Respon--
.i sible Energy ("OCRE") Eleventh Set of Interrogatories to Appli--
i cants, dated February 17, 1984 (postmarked February 18, - 19 8 4 )', t 9
f 3
i state as follows:
h a.
E
'i i
All documents supplied to OCRE for inspection Will berpro-a~
s duced at Perry Nuclear Power Plant ("PNPP").
Arrangemen$s to j
t examine the documents at PNPP can be made by contacting
[
t Mr. Bradley S.
Ferrell of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company ("CEI") at (216).259-3737, extension 5520.
Applican,ts
.. ? f s.
- a will provide copies of any of the produced documents:or por,'.,
,3
~,
i tions ' thereof which OCRE requests at Applicants' cost of"
{
i.
8505070407 850409 DR ADOCK 05000440 g
PDR y
A O
e l
x 4m oc 0
D 3 0 9
a t
s 1 -I ae=W
!! a E a
-ow u,
g ENI'
')
'R
,N im t
x i
N
=e$
n e
s
]
21 a#e %.
}Q S 'S ~ h f
1 %
71 E
4{
gi 3
3 6, "6 e
.z 1. f.g.. i l
.i h
18 a
D G
recommend that such tests and inspections be performed on the
" lead" engines, or it may. recommend that they be performed on PNPP standby diesel generators themselves, depending on the carticular component under consideration.
The results of (m
U~
" lead" engine tests and inspections will be evaluated by the technical staff in order to determine whether additional tests and inspections should be recommended for the PNPP standby die-sel generators.
11-10.
(a)
Do Applicants have any plans to ever re-place the TDI DGs with rhose from another manuf acturer in PNPP Unit l?
(b)
In Unit 2?
(c)
If not, why not?
(d)
Is this an option in the Design Review / Quality Revalidation Program?
.s 7
Response
(a)
Applicants have no plans to replace the Delaval standby diesel generators in PNPP Unit 1 with diesel generators from another manufacturer.
(b)
Applicants have no plans to replace the Delaval standby diesel generators in PNPP Unit 2 with diesel generators from another manufacture..
(c)
Applicants do not believe that the PNPP standby die-i sel generators are unreliable.
~
y.
(d)
No, replacement of Delaval diesel generators is not f
an alternative being explored by the DR/QR Program. -
-g g.
7 3
,y,
11-11.
(a)
Do Acolicants share the coinion voiced at the Jan. 26, 1984 meeting (see Tr. 46-47) that the Cwners Group Design Review / Quality Revalidation Program will be successful?
If so, what is the basis for this optimism?
(b)
What is meant by " success" of the program?
What criteria and standards are used to define " success" of the pro-r~.
l, gram?
(c)
If the program is not successful, what actions will be taken?
(d)
How many failures or quality deficiencies are neces-sary before Applicants or the owners Group will conclude that TDI diesel engines are unreliable and unfit for nuclear ser-vice?
I.e., is there any number or type of failure considered unacceptable?
Response
(a)
The statement to which the Interrogatory refers was made by an unidentified attendee of the meeting, and Applicants do not know what that person meant by a " successful" program.
Applicants do believe that the DR/OR Program will be successful with respect to the PNPP standby diesel generators, as "suc-cess" is defined in (b), below.
The basis for Applicants' be-lief is stated in (c), below.
(b)
By success of the program, Applicants mean a complete review of the PNPp standby diesel generators within the guidelines of the Owners Group charter.
(c)
Applicants are confident that the DR/QR Program for the PNPP standby diesel generators will be successful because sufficient resources have been made available through the Own-ers Group to assure completion of the program.
A g" ~ ( d )
There is no specified number or type of failure or kqualitydeficiencywhichApplicantsconsiderunacceptablefor
the PNPP standby diesel generators.
Applicants' evaluation of the reliability of the PNPP standby diesel generators will be l
,is not a cur _oose of the based on all of the available data.
It to the
(
l.
Owners Group to draw conclusions with respect reliability.or fitness of any particular Delaval diesel genera-tor or Delaval diesel generators in general.
s
- - ~
What influence do cost / schedule factors (i.e.
11-12.
delay of fuel load or power operation) have on the Design Re-view / Quality Revalidation Program and on decisions or conclu-sions made during the program?
Response
Neither cost nor scheduling factors will have any influ-ence on the DR/QR Program, nor decisions made or conclusions reached during the program.
~
11-13.
Is the Design Review / Quality Revalidation Program in-only a program to determine interim reliability, or is it tended to justify the use of TDI DGs for the entire life of the plant?
Response
The p,pr.pcas of the DR/QR Program is to evaluate di Ael 3
generator components from a design and quality standpoint, not
.f to determin_e interim reliabil(ty or to justify t.h_e. use of Delaval diesel generators for any particular period of time.
~ ~,,_ _
11-14.
(a)
Will the Design Review / Quality Revalidation to find the root cause of TDI engine Program attempt unreliability?
(b)
If so, explain how this is to be accomplished.
(c)
If not, why not? ;
1
l
~1
- l THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY j
CtEVELAND, OHI]
l 1
Edward C. Christiansen, being duly sworn according to law, deposes that he is Engineer, Nuclear Construction Department, of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Com;iany, and that the facts set forth in the answers to Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy Interrogateries 11-1 through 11-15 in the foregeing " Applicants Answers to Ohio Citizens for Responsi$le Energy Eleventh Set of Interrogatories to Applicants Relating to Issue No. 16," dated Harch 8, 1994, are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief.
(.
S
%~
AmQ -
i Sworn to and subscribed before-me this
[
day of
~
owA /19 4 C# w sus r8 E i:Lv>
N.
. -,y.;
.._.w.,.
-~
...