ML20116D813

Forwards Util Response to Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power 850417 Motion to Reopen Phase I Record in Two Pleadings,In Response to ASLB 850418 Order.First Pleading Responds to Motion & First Two Questions of Order

ML20116D813
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	04/25/1985
From:	Axelrad M NEWMAN & HOLTZINGER
To:	Bechhoefer C, Eva Hill, John Lamb Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20116D817	List: ML20116D813 ML20116D824 ML20116D831
References
CON-#285-739 OL, NUDOCS 8504300054
Download: ML20116D813 (2)

Text

P

. .. .l M

NEWMAN & HOLTZINGER, P. C 1615 L ST R E ET, N. W.

JACn R.NEwM AN W AS H I N GTON, D. C. 20 03 6 w,LuAM E. S AER,JR.

'"""'"' 000KETEp E. GREW R,8ANNES

'!"" 's ". lt?S "'**

$fNff E SY/c',"E,

M AumsCE AnELRAD 2O2 - 955-66003NRC J. A. SouaNIGHT, JR- MERLE W. FALLON*

STEVEN P. FR ANT 2 CEUL M. mECE BRIAN R.GISH f EORGE L. EDGAR ,

ogg g QQ Mje STEVEN C.GOLDSERG K ATHLE E N M. S M EA

• UJ 4) L/ iM e J1LL E. GRANT

&' AVID G. POWELL SCOTT 4. MARM AN DOUGLAS G. GREEN DESORAM L.M KlNS R AROL LYN NEwM AN JOMN T. STOUGM, JR. MOLLvN.LiNDEMAN JAMES 4.WASILE UFICE OF SECRIAb <

" 00CKEIIf4G & SEP"lci .",7,'o" ;' ll,%

cE* VIN.IGuTU'"ANM BRANCH JANEi.RTAN REVIN P.GALLEN C ON ALD J. SILVE RM A N THOMAS A.SCMMUT2 JACOLYN A.SIMMONS MICMAEL F. meaty ao' t a' ' *"* April 25, 1985 i l,'","? '"

ROSERT LOWENSTElM NORMAN 4. FLANINGAM

' OF C OUNSEL Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.

Chairman, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ranel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. James C. Lamb, III Administrativ6 Judge 313 Woodhaven Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Ernest E. Hill Administrative Judge Hill Associates 210 Montego Drive Danville, CA 94526 Re: Houston Lighting & Power Co., et al.

South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-498, STN 50-499[4

Dear Members of the Board:

On April 17, 1985, CCANP served " Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power (CCANP) Motion to Reopen Phase I Record." In an order dated April 18, 1985, the Licensing Board directed the parties to address at the April 30 prehearing conference three procedural questions suggested by the Motion and invited any written answer on these matters in the context of their written responses to the Motion.

Applicants hereby submit their response to the Motion in two pleadings.

.A ,

/

8504300054 050425 B O PDR ADOCK 0500 o

c>Q -

(.

• 1 NxWMAN & HoLTz Noz::,P. C.

Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.

Dr. James C. Lamb, III Ernest E. Hill Page Two April 25, 1985 The first pleading, entitled " Applicants' Response to CCANP Motion to Reopen Phase I Record," responds to the entire Motion and to two of the three questions raised in the order of April 18.

Since the third question relates to the propriety of present counsel's continued representation of Applicants in this pro- f ceeding, we believe that such question is more appropriately addressed by counsel with no other involvement in this proceeding.

Accordingly, a response to this question is contained in the second pleading, entitled " Applicants' Memorandum Concerning Counsel's Continued Representation of Applicants," prepared by William H. Allen, Esquire, of Covington & Burling. A Notice of Appearance is also enclosed for Mr. Allen, who will address this question on behalf of Applicants at the prehearing conference.

Very truly yours, Maurice Axelrad MA/aps Enclosures cc: Service List

. - , . . -