ML20115F167
| ML20115F167 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1985 |
| From: | Danni Smith COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20115F170 | List: |
| References | |
| 9966N, NUDOCS 8504190433 | |
| Download: ML20115F167 (49) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:r , Commonwealth Edison
> One First National Piazz. Chicago. Illinois O ! -
Address Reply to: Post Offica Box 767
'q_, , Chicago. Illinois 60690 pggy g, j [
- 3 psL-gr-k L
. April 12, 1985 hMS $- -
I m f1LElg . Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator - Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
Subject:
Braidwood Station Units 1 & 2 Braidwood Construction Assessment' Program Monthly Meeting Minutes / Monthly Report Docket No. 50-456 and 50-457 l
Dear Mr. Keppler:
The seventh open briefing on the status of the BCAP effort was provided to the NRC on March 14, 1985 at the Mazon EOF. Forwarded herewith is a meeting summary including a copy of the visual-aid material used in the presentations. The next briefing meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on April 11, 1985 at the Mazon EOF. Also forwarded herewith for your information is the BCAP Director's Progress Report for the month of February, 1985. Please direct any questions relating to BCAP to Mike Wallace, Assistant Manager of Projects and the Braidwood Project Manager. ery g truly y urs, w David H. Smith Nuclear Licensing Administrator
/klj Attachments cc: NRC Resident Inspector - Braidwood NRC BCAP Inspector - Braidwood John Hansel - ERC N. N. Kaushal - CECO 8504190433 850412
{DR ADOCK 05000456 PDR Apg1 b $000 b\ 9966N L's . d---
~ Meeting Summary BCAP NRC/ CECO /ERC Monthly Meeting March 14, 1985 9:00 a.m.
Mazon 80F The meeting was opened with a brief statement by R. F. Warnick of the NRC Region III giving the purpose for'the meeting, that is, to discuss BCAP, it's progress,-'and the Independent Expert Overview Group's (ISOG) review of the BCAP. -Mr. Warnick also stated that upon completion of the presentation by CECO and the IBOG, the NRC would respond to questions from the public in attendance. The following is the agenda utilized for the remainder of the meeting. _I. . Introduction Presented by the Braidwood Project Manager to provide the major topics of the presentation:(see Enclosure 1). II. BCAP Task Force Presented by the BCAP Director to provide the BCAP achievements for the month of February and the status of the RSCAP element. (see Enclosure 2). III.- Follow-Up to BCAP Observations'from RSCAP Presented by the Braidwood Project Manager to provide the action taken to follow-up BCAP Observations from RSCAP. (See enclosure 3). IV. Discrepancy Evaluation Presented by the Sargent & Lundy Project Director to provide Sargent & Lundy's status of work (see Enclosure 4).
- v. Quality Assurance Presented by the General Supervisor of Quality Assurance to describe the overview activities of the Ceco BCAP QA group (see Enclosure 5).
f 1095J L i
. . .. S
. Pp2 V. IBOG Progress Report Presented.by the Project Manager of the IBOG.to describe the overview activities of the IBOG (see Enclosure 6).
- Additional items discussed during the meeting are included in '
Enclosure 7. The attendance for the meeting is provided in Enclosure 8. The i ' meeting adjourned at 11:15 a.m. 1 o.
'f.
I
'1095J i
e i
Enclosure 1 5
. , , . Page 1 of 1 ;
ib X , BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM , (RCAP_) MONTHLY NRCeSTAFF BRIEFING s MARCH 14, 1985 I. INTRODUCTION MIKE WALLACE II. BCAP TASK FORCE NINU KAUSHAL 9 III. DISCREPANCY EVALUATION KEN K0STAL ' IV. -QUALITY ASSURANCE NEIL SMITH V. INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW. GROUP JOHN HANSEL
.W
/
s i
- .: Enclosure 2
. Page 1 of 17 3
BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP) MONTHLY BRIEFING PRESENTED TO REGIONAL OFFICE -- REGION III U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION N. N. KAUSHAL BCAP DIRECTOR MARCH 114, 1985 (1029J)
\
Enclosure 2 Page 2 of 17 CSR STATUS COMPIETED TOTAL IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION CATEGORIES 30 30 DESCRIPTION 0F POPULATIONS 30 30 IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS IN POPULATIONS 29 30 RAND 0M PORTION SELECTION 28 30 ENGINEER 9G JUDGEMENT PORTION SELECTION 21 30 REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS ?5 28 VERIFICATION PACKAGES 1776 2683" REINSPECTIONS 1230 2683" DOCUMENTATION REVIEW CHECKLISTS 26 30 DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PACKAGES 1714 2509" DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS 639 2509' APPR0XIMATE, CURRENT ESTIMATE 1044J
ex.
*" */
Enclosura 2 E- , Paga 3 of 17
,t, 9() G .O
~
' th N
.- s // / ,' , '- /. N Nfs 's,,s s N cic b,e,.v :oc.cs; ss..v-ss qcs v -: .QNs. Nx.,s;. e
.s ss s s
/f/. /. / /- /
c 6N bs w 6 ,q.:. / / . N sN N.s cc,s s Ae.N;s Ns s qs N. ges q.- /f . s ss. sN s
- ' 4 D'QR$;s\s
- R N ' $';h), sD' s/ / / /,//./- .'N'N's. \.\,'K .F_.
e sN . ss a Nqs . N J$$e
.x- s NN,N ,s'd.
' - - .- / s ss -
c.
$ JRS498N.s s
.<>hbS
\ '
c'$,,N.:N'Dh/,/ v // ,// // 'N
~
/,
.NNs\ Ns N s h~
S // // /,'// N,N . N \ 'sJ.)\'NIN. c.- 9
'k.'JN '(M. sS 'ke:o_.3's'86-T8'sk
- - 8.b::e.:_b_ N. . _ b A_v ::sv_
6N_.: _ __
/: / . / -[ , 's s .
s~ E_ r'- 0 r .... ... p-> - n e.: s.
. ;,N.
- m. .;. .,/
s- < .,,i// //,- . . /.
/ / . .k..
s ' s / r / / ws:
% r s < /
g ;Q., :+sx
,.. s.s.s .N ... , /, .i, ,/ ./e ; // /./ ,< ,
i c. - cc p.. c 3 s . -}. , . - - ss M E> '
- s{6,$V'///,/,,// / / / /./'[.-{' g
/t'_
;szbt ss l
% x, s.
n c
- Q xs.V//
. s. : .y/ / ./.,/
. / / // / i /. /.c -
< y r,
o A, e .c c - r- # n C Q- -
@ $ $ $p 3: v..s.. .,-- . - - xs s s. -e
.I N d b ,- / ,. ,/ ,< #f,/ .,NN',- N, ,
b ._y
.s s .-
s s s s s s.f[s'.sd.../ / / / / / NN / 'N' A m>- 4 h,s.' \%2c.$:
- x. s . .- . s.N
' N '
s. s, o, q
$C
- s s. s . x ,s f.
3 's .,./sNv, .. s// <- , /,/ ../.... ss s.x N..'N s. __ e .t. s ss .. NsNs s s.Ns s. y 4 -
.co. / ~
sNs. N'Q D.*I fd // e,,// /./ O7
',A.
o 'N /. s.s :.:8MS:// /./// ~' x
-, -/ s:N -N- :'N.
s
.-::s,:~.' N. N . : .-
+
&se 4 R g -
(.kh/ / /,/,///, N '\.lNNl-c:sss; ./e f/,//.s f / // .. x N -ss.N y s . . f,f g.s%Q'-/./ p:@\s
/ / /(/ /,..'s,,N[N 's. N -] -
[ sNN.:/ v . ,.7/s s/./ /,/. .\.Ns.s.NN *
- s. s
*c., _
s. s sv . /.. / // - / */.. %N., s* -s s- [:s g.ss
.-./ <.'f,/ / f / ./ .
. .x. -
%. 1 s . ee / / / / / ./ / ~. % ssN l 6 6 6 6 I I e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C G (C f'- 10 45 t M N -
& GC OM, cod ,1Q'0[J
m - ,.
~Encloiure 2 *
- Page'4 of 17 o
I @ N 4 % e - g
--s.- - , . , . . .- s s s . - g i
's N S
*)' N. sss,s s'.$'
.,,sN.s,Us,. 4. gsss s' N / / ., ',\s N N
.. s sss ss 4-NsNse NN Ja 'DUUDQ'.Ds'UD.cc'i/
.- - s N. .'. 'ss 'N. .
N s-
.J ,sN. ss>@N.s- . *N.,. N s Ns Ng*f . .y*. .. s ,, s *. s N N ,,N
'.q s ss .
th
. .... s N*. .N gs . , ss- r. N . s. sN N s 'N g ,.N - N c
s., qs,. sN., e s. s s.N cs,ss;s,se Ns. . .
'Uc.'%sNf'Q:QN 'R?? .. ;O.D$$Q c,\, Q N$~.. ,' ,.' N'N '\'N'N'N "E. ' c,. -
O N .N ' N i E
,0-::c.N'N,R. 0ccot-@.cccqc,N$:,R,N. .. -/./. '- t .N.\ ' . .. N.,. '\s N - N,N-
.,Ns s stsc N;sN O s,..N
.N s -sN O
.sN ' s s
. ,s
'UU.N.N'Ko.s/D(s'Nghs.
No_ c .
,cN Ns s'.Ns' ,'?d . s.4,
.c.sc@.s.
f / t . N .. s . sN
. \
. N .cxN. N .
N N ;s N N N .N_
'\s -
- o. .N*N. (.?
~
r' >- m \n - g-W r-Nt 'Qr N e. ("- ... s s ,. .
]N r- s; ;s:.g ,.- s N.N,s N d
,-s,. s..
. s
.e- ..
cs ...s ..
., ., ..3. . f .,.. s..N,,. s. .N. 7e
, , E. .
y .s
.,,,g
. .,., f .,.
- g,
, {,
ar
.- . N
- .p ' , .. O, y , NN 4
- . ,2s:::: R. V. .), . .N._ ...,\ ,\.'. N 5 t r'
' [C *s . .s
'C?.s::.<Jy')c,N.N,'s.'
s N. l q. .
..,s.. . J. .[..s.-
(c r,- o- -
- -.f. - , -y - ' . ,..~N . '- .ss.. - sN g M p
. m.
e
~f- 3- .-
s, A - g 4 ,,& O m m c.; Q( r m n ;e
~ u u .-
. . , . sss_.
gs s
/ .r. .N.s - .- gN.
.- c q.
w q .s .,.N s sxcQ .sg ..- /e/ .
- cc
. . N ,Nx N,x s. .-
y s . ,i ,s s
,.scsN c.c ss c ,s. s. , ..
f ,,.
, '. .N s s ,
s
. N -e v_, _.
4 g .Npp,o.s
,s N ,sf
/,/,/...N
<.t .
s ,,.,N.N .N'N s .-s s N. g.u ,< 3t _ q.
.; o N d ,y e - .r w
s..s- s ..NNN' v, (
//,ff <. ec. .s..-NN.N .,*. s s-
- . s s -
gW , \. ., f 9s N;.NNs'N,s f e/ > /) s s N s -s- s.. (4-y,. e /-, / f /. 4 . sN' N,'s N NsN -
- s N. -,
;Q'\ q., s,tN- Qs, -
-O d O 4
- N e4 -
.: v ,/ , / ,/ s N
..s
, / ,/ ,//,%*
./,. --
G Nl,
. t .// i/./: ,/ sj-\ .N. E
,c
.sc O
,.h.,. .,
. Ns \.' (.;,
~
q . ., ./ , '. / , N. N '
,, / . s, s i,,3 / , * '/, ' N '*.
9
. i. i , i 6. , i i i i i a
sl ct. 0 O r.J,
. (C. b. O. *r. Fe. f J. .
-. - O C 0 O O O O O O
',6 p u D S Fa*.-Q j, ,
s e ow;cDd .20~0N
/ Enclosure 2 . Page 5 of 17 RPSR STATUS IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES IS COMPLETE, TOTAL OF 500 PROCEDURES IDENTIFIED.
IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN FSAR COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS IS COMPLETE PREPARATRION OF CHECKLISTS AND REVIEW 0F-PROCEDURES INITIATED (FEBRUARY 1985) COMPARISON OF CHECKLISTS AGAINST PROCEDURES COMPLETED FOR:
- MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL
- M&O INSULATION
- COMSTOCK 1043J
Enclosure 2
. Page 6 of 17 RSCAP STATUS ALL SCAPS ARE UNDER REVIEW (N0VEMBER, 1984)
QCSSR FINAL REPORT DRAFTED AND UNDER REVIEW (JANUARY, 1985) SAFETY-RELATED PIPE SUPPORTS REPORT IN DRAFT STAGE (JANUARY, 1985) REINSPECTION OF SAFETY-RELATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DOCUMENTATION AND REPORT PREPARATION IN PROGRESS ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION AND REPORT PREPARATION IN PROGRESS TWO.(2) OBSERVATIONS IDENTIFIED DURING LAST MONTH (TOTAL TO DATE - 19) 1043J l-
Enclosure 2
. Page 7 of.17 RSCAP METHODOLOGY l
l RSCAP EFFORT CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING REVIEW STEPS FOR EACH SCAP: COMMITMENT REVIEW A REVIEW AND LIS11NG 0F VARIOUS DOCUMENTS REQUIRING THE CORRECTIVE ACTION SUCH AS: 50.55(E), NRC INSPECTION REPORTS, AUDITS, AND NCR'S. PROCEDURE REVIEW A REVIEW 0F THE PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM FOR ADEQUATE INCORPORATION OF THE PROGRAM COMMITMENT (S).
- IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW A REVIEW 0F THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GOVERNING PROCEDURES (FOR ONGOING SCAP'S).
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW A REVIEW 0F THE DOCUMENTATION GENERATED DURING THE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM. THIS EFFORT WILL ENSURE THE VALIDITY OF THE CONCLUSIONS REACHED IN
' RELATION TO THE RESPECTIVE PROGRAM OBJECTIVES.
(1029J)
l Enclosure 2
.- Page 8 of 17 PIPING HEAT NUMBER TRACEABILITY VERIFICATION PROGRAM BACKGROUND THIS PROGRAM WAS ESTABLISHED TO VERIFY THAT ALL LARGE AND SMALL BORE PIPING MATERIALS INSTALLED BY PHILLIPS, GETSCHOW COMPANY PRIOR TO 11/82 AND 7/83, RESPECTIVELY, WERE CORRECT AND TRACEABLE.
RSCAP STATUS RSCAP REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND REPORT IS BEING DRAFTED RSCAP RESULTS PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAM WERE GENERALLY ADEQUATE EXCEPT FOR TWO OBSERVATIONS. BOTH OBSERVATIONS PERTAINED TO LACK OF WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTAIN ASPECTS OF WORK BEING DONE. PROCEDURES WERE ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENTED EXCEPT FOR TWO OBSERVATIONS ON WHICH CORRECTIVE ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN. ONE PERTAINED TO EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN IS0 METRICS FROM THE PROGRAM. THE OTHER PERTAINED TO NOT STRICTLY FOLLOWING PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS. DOCUMENTATION WAS FOUND TO BE SUFFICIENT AND ACCURATE. OVERAll ASSESSMENT THE PROGRAM COMMITMENTS ARE BEING MET. 1030J
Enclosure 2
. Page 9 of 17 SAFETY-RELATED PIPE, SUPPORTS i
BACKGROUND PHILLIPS, GETSCHOW Co. (PGCO) CONDUCTED A PROGRAM TO REINSPECT SAFETY-RELATED PIPE SUPPORTS INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 1982. RSCAP STATUS RSCAP REVI'EW IS COMPLETED AND REPORT IS BEING DRAFTED. RSCAP RESULTS IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IS ADEQUATE, NO OBSERVATIONS REPORTED. IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW COMPLETED. TWO OBSERVATIONS WERE REPORTED (PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE) DOCUMENTATION REVIEW COMPLETED. ONE OBSERVATION REPORT ISSUED. (PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE) DOCUMENTATION TO BE REVIEWED PER CECO NCR OVERALL RSCAP ASSESSMENT SUBJECT TO DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PER NCR AS ABOVE, PROGRAM ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES THE COMMITMENT. (1029J)
.- Enclosure 2
. Page 10 of 17 NSSS COMPONENT SUPPORT. VERIFICATION PROGRAM BACKGROUND THIS PROGRAM WAS ESTABLISHED FOR VERIFICATION AND INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION AND ISSUANCE OF AN N-5 FOR THE NSSS SUPPORTS.
RSCAP STATUS COMMITMENT AND PROCEDURE REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE. IMPLEMENTATION AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS ARE IN PROGRESS. RSCAP RESULTS TO DATE THE PROCEDURES REVIEWED WERE ADEQUATE EXCEPT FOR THE FOLLOWING: PROCEDURES LACKED SUFFICIENT INSTRUCTIONS APPROPRIATE FOR CERTAIN INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES AND ISSUANCE OF N-5 REPORT. PROCEDURE HAS BEEN REVISED. DESIGN DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS NEEDED TO BE CLARIFIED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY. SPECIFICA-TION HAS BEEN UPDATED. DRAWING NOTE TO BE CLARIFIED (1029J)
1- . Enclosure 2
. Page 11 of 17 INSTRUMENTATION INSTALLATION VERIFICATION BACKGROUND PHILLIPS, GETSCHOW Co. (PGCO) CONDUCTED A PROGRAM TO REINSPECT INSTRUMENTATION AND REVIEW DOCUMENTATION FOR INSTRUMENTATION DRAWINGS ISSUED PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 1984.
RSCAP STATUS COMMITMENT LIST AND PROCEDURE REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE.
- IMPLEMENTATION AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS ARE IN PROGRESS.
RSCAP RESULTS TO DATE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IS ADEQUATE; NO OBSERVATIONS REPORTED. IMPLEMENTATION AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS IN PROGRESS: NO OBSERVATIONS REPORTED TO DATE. (1029J)
.- / Enclosure 2
- Page 12 of 17 REINSPECTION OF SAFETY RELATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT BACKGROUND THE SUBJECT PROGRAM CONSISTS OF TWO MAJOR ACTIVITIES.
- 1. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION STATUS PROGRAM
- 2. STEAM GENERATOR BOLTING REINSTALLATION PROGRAM RSCAP STATUS
- COMMITMENT AND PROCEDURE REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE
- IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW NOT PERFORMED AS SUBJECT PROGRAM IS COMPLETE.
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW COMPLETE EXCEPT FOR FINAL COMPILATION OF D A T A'. RSCAP RESULTS INSTALLATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT WAS INITIALLY ESTABLISHED EQUIPMENT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PROGRAM WAS ACCURATELY IDENTIFIED 1033J
Enclosure 2 . Page 13 of 17 e REINSPECTION OF SAFETY RELATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CONT'D) RSCAP RESULTS (CONT'D) CONTRACTOR AND CECO INSPECTION HOLD POINTS WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS S.G. BOLT / HELI-COIL REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION WERE WELL DEFINED AND IMPLEMENTED EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION RECORDS ACCEPTABILITY IS CURRENTLY INDETERMINATE DUE TO INCONSISTENCIES AND INCOMPLETENESS SUPPLEMENTAL DATA RECORD SHEET NOT BEING MAINTAINED EQUIPMENT LOG NOT MAINTAINED CERT. DOCUMENTATION FOR SOME S.G. BOLTS CURRENTLY NOT LOCATABLE NO RECORD OF ANI INVOLVEMENT IN SCREW / HELI-COIL CHANGE OUT FOLLOW-UP ACTION THE CONTRACTOR HAS COMMITTED (BY NCR) TO RECONSTRUCT AND RED 0CUMENT THE EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION RECORD DATA PACKAGES AND ASSOCIATED STATUS SYSTEMS TO CURRENT PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS THROUGH A REVIEW OF EXISTING DOCUMENTATION. 1033J
Enclosure 2
.- Page 14 of 17 HVAC BACKGROUND THE HVAC RETROFIT PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH OMITTED WELDS, IMPROPER CONFIGURATION, AND LACK OF APPROVED DETAILS FOR DUCT ACCESSORY FABRICATION, RSCAP STATUS COMMITMENT AND PROCEDURE REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE
- IMPLEMENTATION AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS ARE IN PROGRESS RSCAP RESULTS TO DATE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES APPEAR TO BE ADEQUATE, NO OBSERVATIONS REPORTED.
IMPLEMENTATION AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS IN PROGRESS: NO OBSERVATIONS REPORTED TO DATE. I (1029J) L.
~
. Enclosure 2
, Page 15 of 17 QC INSPECTION REINSPECTION PROGRAM BACKGROUND THE SUBJECT PROGRAM WAS INSTITUTED TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BRAIDWOOD QC INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM BY THE REINSPECTION OF THE FIRST NINETY (90) DAYS OF INSPECTIONS PERFORMED BY THE INSPECTORS SELECTED FOR ASSESSMENT.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON SUSPENDED ACTIVITIES ON MARCH 16, 1984 PENDING ISSUANCE OF A SITE PROCEDURE. STATUS OF REVIEW BY RSCAP RSCAP REVIEW 0F THE QC INSPECTOR REINSPECTION PROGRAM (QCIRP) WAS SUSPENDED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1984 IN RESPONSE TO THE SITES' ASSESSMENT OF.THE PROGRAM'S STATUS AND SUBSEQUENT ACTIONS TAKEN BY Ceco. S 1030J
, +-
' Enclosure 2 Page 16 of 17 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION DOCUMENT REVIEW PROGRAM BACKGROUND THIS PROGRAM CONSISTS OF A. REVIEW 0F L.K. COMSTOCK RECORDS FOR RETRIEVABILITY,/ ACCOUNTABILITY AND PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE RSCAP STATUS PROCEDURE REVIEW HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW COMPLETED. DOCUMENTATION REVIEW NOT PERFORMED DUE TO CECO'S DECISION TO PERFORM A RE-REVIEW. RSCAP REPORT BEING DRAFTED. RSCAP RESULTS RECORDS RETRIEVABILITY SYSTEM WAS ESTABLISHED AND PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED. PROCEDURES WERE GENERALLY ADEQUATE WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS AS NOTED IN THE OBSERVATIONS WRITTEN. INADEQUATE PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTATION RESULTED IN A LESS THAN THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE RECORDS. ONE OBSERVATION, FOR IMPROPER PROCEDURAL IMPLEMENTATION, WAS REPORTED. OVERALL RSCAP ASSESSMFNT OVERALL QUALITY OF THE RECORDS WAS IMPROVED: A RE-REVIEW 0F THE DOCUMENTATION AS UNDERTAKEN BY CECO SHOULD RESULT IN ACCEPTABLE DOCUMENTATION. 1030J
i J Enclosure 2
, Page 17 of 17 QUALITY CONTROL STRUCTURAL STEEL REVIEW BACKGROUND THE QCSSR IS A COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N INITIATED PROGRAM TO COLLECT INFORMATION ON QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AND REPORT TO THE ARCHITECT ENGINEERS FOR THEIR ANALYSIS. THE j PROGRAM WAS PERFORMED BY G.K. NEWBERG, INC.
RSCAP STATUS RSCAP REVIEW COMPLETE, AND REPORT IS BEING DRAFTED. RSCAP RESULTS PROCEDURE FOR IMPLEMENTATION WAS ADEQUATE. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS ADEQUATE EXCEPT FOR A MINOR OBSERVATION - (WELD MEASURING TOOLS) l DOCUMENTATION WAS ADEQUATE EXCEPT FOR A MINOR OBSERVATION l (REQUIRED FORM NOT ALWAYS COMPLETED) OVERAll RSCAP ASSESSMENT l PROGRAM FULFILLED OBJEif!/ES 1 1030J L - .
Enclosure 3 . Page 1 of 2 EDLLOW-UP TO BCAP OBSERVATIONS FROM RSCAP GFNFRAL ALL OBSERVATIONS DISPOSITIONED AS NCR'S 4 0F 9 REVIEWED WEEKLY BY PROJECT MANAGER AND STAFF WE WILL AGGRESSIVELY ADDRESS BCAP OBSERVATION
-SPECIFIC AREA SUMMARIES A. SAFETY RELATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT REVIEW TO UPGRADE EQUIPMENT DOCUMENTATION BEGAN JUNE, 1984, TO NEW PROCEDURE, ON A LOW PRIORITY --
N0W UPGRADED PRIORITY. B. ELECTRICAL DOCUMENTATION REVIEW ON FEBRUARY 6, 1985, CONTRACTOR DIRECTED TO BEGIN FINAL DOCUMENT REVIEW EARLIER THEN PLANNED, TO ASSURE QUALITY OF DOCUMENTATION. (1358D)
Enclosure 3 . Page 2 of 2 SAFETY RFIATED MFCHANICAL FOUIPMENT DOCUMENTATION UPGRADE FOURTH QUARTER OF 1983 NEW PHILLIPS, GETSCH0W COMPANY MANAGEMENT IDENTIFIED NEED FOR UPGRADE OF PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION. QCP-B22, REVISION 5 IMPLEMENTED JUNE, 1984 TWO SIMULTANE0US REVIEW PROCESSES WERE INITIATED IN JUNE, 1984, TO IMPLEMENT QCP-B22, REVISION 5: ITEM BY ITEM REVIEW FOR REVISION WORK TOTAL PACKAGE REVIEW (36 COMPLETE) i ITEMS FOUND DISCREPANT DURING THESE REVIEWS WERE IDENTIFIED ON NCR's. TOTAL PACKAGE REVIEW N0W HAS BEEN GIVEN INCREASED EMPHASIS (1350D)
..~
-~
Enclosure 4 ikE[H 4, 1985 CSR REINSPECTION DISCREPANCIES BY CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR- , POPULATI0tl RECEIVED COMPLETED
-COMSTOCK CONDUIT 171 164 ,
CONDUIT HANGERS 92 9 4 CABLES 44 2 CABLE PANS 92 - 0 CABLE PAN HANGERS 1 0 PULUiAN DUCTS 124 79 HVAC EQUIP. INSTALL
- 47 47
~
DUCT HANGERS 84 61 TOUCH-UP GALVANIZING 2 0 l PHILLIPS GETSCHOW SB PIPING
- 43 43 LB PIPING 64
- 63
-LB RIGID SUPPORTS 95 56 LB NON RIGID SUPPORTS 134 88 ,
SB SUPPORTS 55 24 NEWBERG - CONCRETE PLACEMENT 78 47 STRUCTURAL STEEL 39 0 MASONARY WALLS 4 0 1169 683
?ALLEVALUATIONSCOMPLETED lc-1 9
i
, MARCH lli, 1985 , Enclosure 4 CSRDISCREPANCIESBYCLASSIFICATId$' l CLASSIFICATI0Il RECEIVED COMPLETED WEQING - UNDERCUT, UNDERSIZE jPOROSITY 238 126 DIMENSIONAL - LOCATION, LENGTH 253 136 BOLTING LOOSE, MISSING, PATTERN 83 11 7 CONCRETE SURFACE DEFECT 32 22 DAMAGE - DENTS, HOLES, ARC STRIKES, DIRT 74 34 WRONG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE 11 5 18 INCOMPLETE.- SEALANT, CONNECTION 32 22 EMBEDMENTS 22 5 -
FIT-UP - DUCT,. HANGERS, DAMPER 12 3 EABRICATION - CABLE PAN HANGERS FIELD FAB 1 . 0, INVALID - NOT DISCREPANT, NOT SAFETY RELATED 104 103
~
VALVE STEM ORIENTATION 17 . 17 SEGREGATION CODE LABELS - MISSING, ETC, 35 23 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS - LOOSE 60 50 ELECTRICAL SEPARATION 31 15 CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHOR 21 6 SUPPORT SPRING SETTIN'G - 25 16 CONDUIT HANGER 12 9 MISCELLANEOUS.- I.D., TAGS, ETC. 72 31 1169 683 e 0 e
=m
- p. r_ - . . .
SilALL BORE PIPE (CSR-I-M-1) flARCH 14, 1985
~
CSR DISCREPANCIES BY CLASSIFICATION $$$"llfo t CLASSIFICATION RECEWED COMPLETED WELDING -~ UNDERCUT, UNDERSIZEj POROSITY DIMENSIONAL'- LOCATION, LENGTH 12 - 12
. BOLTING - LOOSE, MISSING, PATTERN 3 3 CONCRETE SURFACE DEFECT DAMAGE - DENTS, HOLES, ARC STRIKES, DIRT 2 2 WRONG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE 3 3
. INCOMPLETE - SEALANT, CONNECTION 1- 1 EMBEDMENTS FIT-UP - DUCT, HANGERS, DAMPER FABRICATION - CABLE PANJHANGERS FIELD FAB
. INVALID - NOT DISCREPANT, NOT SAFETY RELATED 9 b VALVE STEM ORIENTATION' 10 10
' SEGREGATION CODE LABELS - MISSING, ETC.
ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS - LOOSE ELFCTRICAL SEPARATION l CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHOR SUPPORT SPRING SETTING CONDUIT HANGER l MISCELLANEOUS-I.D., TAGS,ETC. 3 3 43 43 L L 3 l I t
_ x- ___ Enclosure 4
- Page 4 of'10 March 14, 1985 5
INSPECTION POINTS / DISCREPANCY TYPES
, ,,SMALL BORE PIPING CONFIGURATION (CSR-I-M-1)
Inspection Discrepancy Points Types (Estimated) .( Actual)
- 1. PIPING ORIENTATION 378 A. Relative to Building Coordiantes 7'
- 2. PIPING DIMENSIONS 655 A. As Built Length Difference 71/8" 17
.3. PIPING CONNECTIONS' 1390 A. Incomplete, Loose 3 B.. Vent Cap Not Installed 2 C. . Construction Damage 0 5
<4 . VALVES 960 A. 1 As Built Orientation Difference 75*
13 B. Handwheel Loose, Missing 9 - C. ID/ Flow Tag Incorrect, Missing 4 D. Gland Nuts Loose 4
. E. Operability Interference 1 F. Drafting Inconsistancy 5 G. - Construction Damage 1 37
- 5. SLOPE N/A ~0
- 6. ' DRAIN LINES N/A 0 TOTALS -
3383 66 2.0% I
MARCH 14, 1985
- . LARGE BORE PIPIllG (CSR-I-M-4) $@s"5E$o CSR DISCREPANCIES BY CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATI0il RECEIVED _C011P_LEIEll WEBING - UNDERCUT, UNDERSIZE jPOROSITY DIMENSI0flAL - LOCATION, LENGTH 41 41 BOLTING -' LOOSE,. MISSING, PATTERN CONCRETE SURFACE DEFECT DAf1 AGE - DENTS, HOLES, AR'C STRIKES, DIRT ~2 2
@0NG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE lllCOMPLETE - SEALANT, CONNECTION 2 1 EUBEDMENTS FIT-UP-- DUCT, HANGERS, DAMPER FABRICATION - CABLE PAN HANGERS FIELD FAB INVALID - NOT DISCREPANT, NOT SAFETY RELATED 2 2
- VALVE STEM ORIENTATION . 7 7
. SEGREGATION CODE LABELS - MISSING, ETC. -
ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS - LOOSE ELECTRICAL SEPARATION CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHOR SUPPORT SPRING SETTING CONDUIT HANGER MISCELLANEOUS - I.D., TAGS, ETC. 10 10 , 64 63 1 8 5 ,
. March 14, 1985
. Enclosure 4 '
Page 6 of 10 INSPECTION POINTS / DISCREPANCY TYPES LARGE BORE PIPING CONFIGURATION (CSR-I-M-4)
. Inspection Discrepancy
. . Points Types
- (Estimated)
(Actual) s
- 1. PIPING ORIENTATION '1209 A. Relative to Building coordinates 10
. :2. PIPING DIMENSIONS 2125 A. f As Built Length Difference > l/8" 154
- 3. PIPING CONNECTIONS- 6990 A. -Incomplete, Loose 0 B. Vent Cap Not Installed 0
.C. Construction Damage 2 2
4 VALVES 1777 A. As Built Orientation Difference >5* .7 B. Handwheel Loose,. Missing 0 C. ID/ Flow Tag Incorrect, Missing 13 D. Gland Nuts Loose O E. Operability Interference 1 F. . Drafting.Inconsistancy 2 G. Construction Damage 3 26
- 5. SLOPE N/A 0
- 6. DRAIN LINES N/A 0 -
TOTALS - 12101 .183 1.5% 4 6 [
.- - - . . _ . . - . . . . - . . ~ .
MARCH 14, 1985
.. CONDUIT (CSR-I-E-CND) gl S"] 4 0 ,
CSR DISCREPANCIES BY CLASSIFICATION o CLASSIFICATI01 RECEIVED C0f1PLETED WEBING UNDERCUT, UNDERSIZE jPOROSITY. DIMENSIONAL - LOCATION,. LENGTH 16 16 BOLTING-LOOSE,MI5 SING, PATTERN
-CONCRETE SURFACE DEFECT -
DAMAGE - DENTS, HOLES, ARC STRIKES, DIRT 9 5 WRONG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE INCOMPLETE - SEALANT, CONNECTION 1 0 EMBEDMENTS FIT-UP - DUCT, HANGERS, DAMPER FABRICATION - CABLE PAN HANGERS FIELD FAB-INVALID - NOT DISCREPANT, NOT SAFETY RELATED 43 43 VALVE STEM ORIENTATION SEGREGATION CODE LABELS - MISSING, ETC. 23 23 - l ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS.- LOOSE 50 49 ELECTRICAL-SEPARATION 16 16 CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHOR SUPPORT SPRING SETTING - CONDUIT HANGER 10 9 MISCELLANEQUS - I.o., TAGS, ETC. 3 3 171 164 7
E4 arch 14,1985 Enclosure 4
.,', INSPECTION POINTS /DISCREPA?fCT TYPFS Page 8 of 10 CONDUIT (CSR-I-CND)
Inspection Discrepancy Points Types . (Fer4mnrod) (Actual)
- 1. SIZE ~ ~ ' 295 ~
A.. Mechanical Connection (Loose, Missing) 11 B .; Incorrect Size, Type - 3 C. Disconnected Flex 1 D. Construction Damage 1 16-
- 2. SEGREGATION CODE 276 , 0 ,
- 3. SEGREGATION CODE LABEL 276 A. Missing . 33 B.-Partial, Damaged, Etc. 17
'C. Incorrect Label 1 51
- 4. ORIGIN / DESTINATION 233
.A. Mechanical Connection (Icose, Missing) 43
=B. Disconnected Flex, Conduit 4 C.- Construction Damage 3
.D. Incorrect I.D. 2 E. Dimensional (Iacation, Radius). .3
. F. Additional Support 1 G. ~ Drafting Inconsistancy 1 57
- 5. ' ATTACHMENT TO SUPPORTS 1870 A. Mechanical Connection (Icose, Missing) 27 B. Dimensional-(Location) 6 C. Drafting Inconsistancy 6 D. Construction Damage 1 40
- 6. SEPARATION -
153 A. Safety to Safety - 8 B. Safety to Nonsafety, Lighting 12 20
- 7. BEND RADIUS 320 0
- 8. BENDS BETWEEN PULL POINTS 118 s 1
- 9. TERMINATIONS TO TRAYS O O '
- 10. TERMINATIONS TO EQUIPMENT 233 A. . Dimensional (Length) 5
- B. Construction Damage 6 C. Mechanical Connections (Loose, Missing) 2 D. Incomplete, Incorrect 3 16
- 11. BUSHINGS. 233 10
- 12. WIREWAYS O O TOTALS - 4007 211 5.3%'
8
~
IIARCH 14, 1985 7
~
Enclosure'4 HVAC EQUIPHEUT.(CSR-I-H-2) Page 9 of 10 CSR DISCREPANCIES BY CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATIbN RECEIVED- COMPLElED WELDING - UNDERCUT, UNDERSIZEjPOROSITY b . b
. DIMENSIONAL - LOCATION, LENGTH .
E Ef1 - LOOSE,-MISSING, PATTERN O O COEETE SURFACE DEFECT DAMAGE -' DENTS, HOLES, ARC STRIKES, DIRT 7 7 WRONG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE '1 1 INCOMPLETE SEALANT, CONNECTION 10 10 EMBEDMENTS FIT-UP - DUCT, HANGERS, DAMPER 1 1 FABRICATION - CABLE PAN HANGERS FIELD FAB , INVALID - NOT. DISCREPANT, NOT SAFETY RELATED 5 5 VALVE STEll ORIENTATION SEGREGATION CODE LABELS - MISSING, ETC. ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS - LOOSE ELECTRICAL SEPARATION CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHOR
- SUPPORT SPRING SETTING CONDUIT HANGER MISCELLAIE0DS - I.D., TAGS, ETC. 7 7 47 47 e
9
-,mmm.- ..mr ,--, , -- .,m-t,w.,. - , - -,,-, , , - - - , - - --.,-m7y w.-,-,-,----.e---n,y-p.---y ,m-* e - - - -
-- r . - .m - - _ - . . . . - _ . - _ _ ._...---- -,. -
.~
U.' , l' March 14, 1985 4
.. . , . ., ' INSPECTION POINTS / DISCREPANCY TYPES Enclosure 4 Page 10 of 10 HVAC EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION (CSR-I-H-2)
Inspection Points Discrepancy Types (Estimated) (Actual)
- 1. COMMON ATTRIBUTES
- I 1.1 IDENTIPICATION 57
.a. Missing Tag 6
-- -b. Construction Damage ~8 .
.1.4 .
1.2 LOCITION 166 0 1.3 ORIENTATION
- a. Damper / Damper operator 57 2 1.4 CASKETING AND SEALING 86
. 1.. Missing, Loose 2 1.5 FASTENERS 1219
- m. Incorrect bolt spacing / holes 19
- b. Missing or loose bolts / nuts 8 27 1.6--WELDS 27270
- a .- Fit-up 5
- b. Location / spacing 32
- c. Weld size 8 d .- Weld length- 3
- e. < Cracks 3
- f. < Fusion - -
13
- g. Concavity / convexity 4 h.- Undercut 7 ~
- 1. Porosity / slag inclusion _
-4
- j. Arc strikes 6
- k. Overlap 4
- 1. Nicks / gouges 3
's . Damage (Grinding, burn thru etc.) 28 108 1
1.7 FREE MOVEMENT OF DAMPER OPERATOR 31 3 f 1.8 CLEARANCES 31 0 '
- 2. SPECIAL ATTRIBUTES' ,
~I
[ - j 2.1 FIRE DAMPER / PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES 332
- a. Configuration . I
- b. Seals missing 8-
- c. Damage 1 10 i
l . 2.2- BALANCING DAMPERS 17
- a. Missing wing nut 1 2.3 MODULATING DAMPERS 45
- a. Operator arrangement 2
- 3. MISCELLANEOUS 3 ,
- a. Partial thread engagement for nut 1 -j 1
- b. Bent flashing angle 1 i
l TOTALS - 293l'4 171
]
L a. w 10 ' [ , 0.6% L
m . : ~3<-, .
,s ,m
^
4 __.g-' e n m - - - .c 4 --. , - .
, .- Enclosure 5 ss ,,.. ,
Page.l>of 5-
.)
' f~ g .
4
^3., . S ,
% ,s -
% .s ,
} %
r w . r .y
- ,5_ E
+
\' 1 BCAP 0.A.
4
~ MONTHLY-BRIEFING 4
d-Y [ 't - s
~-,Iw 4 "
N. P. SMITH i f i MARCH '1f4, 19'85' -
? 4 ,e f* .
?
J
.( t L
k 4 j , 6 s s i-
'. p.
>t-5
, 4.
($ e 4-4 i i
.(0297B)'
~
,~f., E
* .,e: ;
u_
. e-J BCAP QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCES 200 -
m W 150 - g z <c d s N $ 100-ce 5 59 - z l ,/ i 1
/ I i i I I I I i I I i i !
ii um o ,@ 7 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 07 14 21 28 04 11 18 25 01 08 15 .22 01 08 15 22 29 ww SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB t%R x Actual SURVEILLANCES Schadulad SURVEILLANCES
7-1
-1 l\
BCAP QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS 16-Actual AUDITS Scheduled AUDITS-a w I e 12- : o K E10-v3 -
^
d a- .-
/ ,
o 6-m -
= _
W l
$~
/
2- / l ?? ef 1
/
1 1 I i l i i i l I ! .I I I 9 wg 71421280512132602 0916233007142128041118250108152201 08152229 RE i SEPT DCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR ww I
- y. ,
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUF TS 40-m . 5 y ./
. / Total CARS 20- f $ Open CARS 5
Z 10-
@ S.
I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ah 7 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 67 14 21 28 04 11 18 25'01 08 15 22 01 08 15 22 29 Pn E SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR mm
s
. Enclosure 5
.,4 J e -'*' , Page 5 of 5 -
e PRELIMINARY OVERINSPECTION SUNNARY- _ No of Population Packages - Objective % Subjective % Criteria. 95 .90 HVAC Duct ~7 97 94 HVAC; Equip.- 8 97 100 Installation SHVAC Duct. 8 99 94 Hanger
~
HVAC Sheet 8 97 N/A Metal Touch Up Galvanizing-Welds
, ' Cat..I Conduit 5 100 100 Hangers Conduit 8 99 N/A Cable Pan 9 100 99 Cables 7 94 N/A Small Bore 9 98 N/A Pipe Conf.
g _Large Bore 9 96 '99 Pipe-Rigid Supports,
; Large Bore Pipe 7 96 98 Non Rigid Supports Large Bore Pipe' 8 95 N/A
' Configuration Small-Bore Pipe 9 99 99 SupportsL Concrete. Placement 2 On Hold e
.NPS/tlw(2735A)
_ _________-.__m__.___ ______.__m____._
oc et BCAP STATUS 3.
- !! MEETING for
! February, 1985 l INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP i March 14, 1985 I
Enclosure 6
- .- Page 2 of 6 O
~~0 3 :: CS o EXEC ~~::V E S UARY t 6 o OV E RV:: EW AC~~::V::~~:: ES o C_0SE) :: SS ES o 0 3 Ei ::SS1 ES 1
i l I I 1 l L
-.,-.,,-.~..,,-,.,-.~,n. , - -c- , -- -, - - - - , ,,n--- - r- ,--n, - - - - - - - - - , , - --. , - - - - . - - - . . - - < - , - , - , - , -
~
EN$"5EI EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
o BCAP OVERVIEW Functioning as designed with checks and bal ances in pl ace. o CSR ELEMENT Operations improved from January. In-spections proceeding with minor problems. Meetings with S&L to discuss their review responses were sati sf actory. o RPSR ELEMENT
- Review of first procedure has been com-i pl eted. Review progressing satisfactorily resulting .in a thorough review of con-struction procedures.
! o RSCAP ELEMENT Concern starting to surface that delay in , the initiation of a few elements will not provide BCAP with. adequate time to assess impl ementati on. i o BCAP QA Continuing to -demonstrate good performance.
- n;A:"U!
OVERVIEW ACTIVITIES REINSPECTIONS o Issued three IE0G observations, two on electrical and one on concrete. Al so , issued one Notice of Concern (N0C) on mechanical . hardware (HVAC) . AUDITS-o Audited BCAP QA in three areas; Audits and Surveill ances, Certi fication and Training, and General Program - no findings, no concerns. DOCUMENTATION REVIEW o Increased IE0G engineering staff to review S&L design significant evalu-ati on s. , o Achieved agreement with BCAP that all discrepancies will be reviewed for l
-programmatic implications.
o Maintained reviews of BCAP observa- ' tions, S&L design significant reviews and PCD NCR's. o Maintained reviews of checkli sts , procedures and pl ans.
--M , w e---,e,-,--,awew e- 1 s. e-. - * - - - - - ------ww-g-w,wc.w+,. - , ewew,---w-w~e.ww,-,,-w--- w m-m ww w ._y-m--w.,,,.r-n =- g v w--,---w+ - -
-m
. lU TH !
CLOSED ISSUES
- 1) Resolution of IEOG observations:
o BCAP-0BS-010: Embed pl ates and construction joint not identified during rei nspection. o BCAP-0BS-011: Items marked N/A were visible; and others marked visible should have been N/A. o BCAP-0BS-014: Work.on hanger in area of cable pan reinspection.
- 2) Incorporation of changes to CSR documents to reflect selection of "high stress" sampl es.
1 r- , - - . . , , - - , . , . . _ . . , - . , - - - , , - - - , - - - - - , , , - . , - . . - . ,
. , - - . ,, +, , - - - . - - . - - , . - - - - - - - - - - . - - . - - - , -
Enclosure 6 s Page 6 of 6 1 OPEN ISSUES 1)- Resolution of Inspector Reinspection element of RSCAP.
- 2) -Verification of the incorporation of
-activities to resolve IE0G observa-ti on s:
o BCAP-0BS-006: Inconsistencies in lists identifying CSR samples. o BCAP-0BS2007: Problem with CSR Small Bore Piping Package review for " red line" drawings. o BCAP-0BS-008: El ectrical i n- t spectors signing for welding and l concrete expansion anchor attri-butes. o BCAP-0BS-012: Construction joint-not li sted in reinspection pack-l age. o BCAP-0BS-013: Cable splices in pan not identified in reinspection package. ,
4, ENCIASURE ~1 ITEMS DISCUSSED AT THE NRC/CBCo/ERC MEETING MARCH 14, 1985 MA20W BOF Mr. Kaushal presented the status of the three BCAP elements. This l presentation particularly focused on the status of RSCAP element of_the BCAP and the BCAP observations resulting from the RSCAP. Mr. Davis asked if BCAP will review and approve the final conclusions of these corrective action programs. Mr. Maiman stated that BCAP will provide confidence in the answers and conclusions drawn by the programs through review of their methodology and implementation but will not approve the final conclusions drawn from the programs. . It was stated that in some cases the programs will be ongoing after the completion of the BCAP and that other programs are data gathering programs which are not intended to draw final conclusions. Mr. Wall' ace presented the positive actions which have been taken by the Braidwood Project to address and follow-up the RSCAP Observations. Mr. Kostal presented the status of processing BCAP discrepancies within Sargent & Lundy. In addition to the usual presentation, Mr. Kostal also presented data on the number of discrepancies as percentage of the number of inspections to provide an overall prespective on the results. During the presentation the NRC asked if welding discrepancies would be evaluated with the same type of approach as used for Byron Station. Mr. Kostal stated that the same type of approach was being used. E Mr. Smith presented the BCAP QA activities for.the month of February. During his presentation Mr. Gardner stated that he felt BCAP QR should have a more direct involvement in the processing of invalid observations. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that he felt BCAP QA should stay out of an in-line processing function. He further stated that he would discuss the item with Mr. Gardner and resolve his question. Mr._ Hansel presented the 180G activities. This presentation included an executive summary, overview activities, closed issues and open. issues.
-Mr. Hansel stated that he felt BCAP was proceeding very well.
Il45J > l
n Enclosura 7 March 14, 1985 Page 2 4 4 This concluded the presentation from CBCo and IBOG to the NRC. At this
-time Mr. Gardner stated that he would like to meet and discuss the BCAP approach in selecting the highly stressed items. It was agreed that Mr.
Gardner and Mr. Kaushal would meet and resolve any questions so that both
-parties would have a clear understanding of the highly stressed selection process. Mr. Warnick stated that he felt the presentation was a good one
.and then opened the meeting for questions to the NRC from the public in attendance.
Mr. Cassel stated that he felt that the engineering judgment portion of the BCAP samples were very important. He also asked about the status of
.the CAT inspection report. Mr. Gardner stated that the BCAP items in the CAT reportfare being addressed within RCAP. Mr. Warnick stated that the enforcement letter from Region III will go to CECO in the near future.
The next meeting was set for April 11, 1985 at 9:00 A.M. at the Mazon E.O.F.. . Meeting was adjourned at 11:15 A.M. l [~ t l 1145J
{'
Enclosure 8 List of Attendees to NAPE POSITION ORGANIZATION R. A. Gardner Reactor Inspector Region III,'NRC
.R. F. Warnick Chief. Branch 1 Region III, NRC R. D. Schulz Sr. Resident - Braidwood Region III, NRC W. L.' Forney Chief Projects Seciton 1 A Region III, NRC B. Berson Regional Counsel Region III. NRC J. M. Jacobson DRS U.S. NRC W. Muffett. DRS Region III, NRC W. J. Kropp Resident Inspector Region III, NRC W. S. Little Chief Operations Branch Region III, NRC E. G. Greenman Deputy Dir. Reactor Projects Region III NRC A. B. Davis Deputy Regional Administrator Region III, NRC G. T. Ankrum Chief QA Branch INE Headquarters R. J. Lauer Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal E. D. Swartz Nuclear Licensing Admin. CECO L. O. De1 George Asst. Vice-President CECO C. W. Schroeder Proj. Lic. & Compliance Supt. CECO W. E. Vahle Proj. Field Eng. Mgr. Ceco V. A. Hoffman- S'ite Manager of SWEC SWEC M. I. Miller Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal D. L. Leone Projects Eng. Mgr. - BY & BR S&L G. M. Orlov Asst. Director BCAP CBCo R. L. Byers Asst. Director BCAP CECO K. T. Kostal- Project Director Braidwood ~'S & L R. E. Ham ISOG, Asst. Project Manager ERC J. L. Hansel IBOG, Project Manager ERC
'N. P. Smith General Supervisor.- QA CECO l D. L. Shamblin Proj. Const. Superintendent CECO E. E. Fitzpatrick Asst. Manager QA CECO T. J. Malman Manager of Projects CECO l N.'N. Kaushal BCAP Director CECO L. S. Weiss BCAP - SWEC Deputy Mg. SWEC
.M. Franco Consultant MRF&A M. J. Wallace Project Mgr. CECO i
1095J l
f PIge 2 Enclosure 8 List of Attendees INNE POSITION ORGANIZATION R. C. Cannon BCAP-QA CECO P. R.~Pelke Project Inspector NRC P. Dunlop Engineering Mgr. SWBC D. Benz Div. of Engineering State of Ill. I. M. Johnson Nuclear Communications CECO D. Cassel' General Counsel BPI R. R. Minue : Nuclear Engineer State Of.Ill. Dept. of Nuc. Safety M. R. Dougherty BCAP Supervisor Ceco
- B.-R. Shelton Projects Engr. Mgr. CBCo J. D. Deress Project Engr. Mgr. BY/BR CECO J. A. Zych BCAP 94 CBCo
- R. E. Spence BCAP QA CECO B. R. Pardunn BCAP Eval. Coordinator S&L D. M..Fischer Proj. Manager BCAP S&L D. A. Haley Sr.-Proj. Engr. S&L T. E. Quaka Site QA Supt. Ceco
-1095J
+
. .; w-
; yw-*
;g April 8, 1985 BCAP Memo #1068
.TO: T.-J. Maiman
. W. J. Shewski M. J. Wallace E. E. Fitzpatrick
'FROM: N. N.-Kaushal
SUBJECT:
Braidwood Construction Assessment Program Progress Report Attached is the-Braidwood Construction Assessment Program
'Reportifor February 1 through February 28, 1985.
N h ,{ N. N.-Kaushal , BCAP Directot-NNK/sjs-cc: R.~N.'-Gardner, NRC
.R. L..Byers G. M. Orlov.
H. L.- Vener N .' P. Smith, QA J. L.-Hansel, ERC BCAP File QG 69.60.3 QG 69.70.2 (I, F v
\ Y
< w - - , , - , , ,. -- -- - . , , . . w- , , .---new, ---+w , - - - - er ~ -
-- ~e-r-}}