ML20114E783
| ML20114E783 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1996 |
| From: | Michael Brown, Miller D, Pillsbury N NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20114E760 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-960611, NUDOCS 9606270119 | |
| Download: ML20114E783 (79) | |
Text
e, REVO June 10,1996
~
Nuclear Safety and Oversight (NSO)
Assessment Plan for MP3 Restart CONTENTS NSO Oversight Objectives Section i NSO Assessment Plan for MP3's: " Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation" Section 11 NSO Assessment Plan for MP3's: " Improvement Actions are Completed" Section ll1 NSO Assessment Plan for MP3's: " Plant Hardware
- Critical Backlog"Section IV NSO "Startup Assessment Team"Section V NSO Plant Startup Assessment hfil 4G Submitted: N.A. Pillsbury Date iffh
/
SubmWfgM.B. Brown Date
[
h h//b Approved: D.B. h/liller, Jr // D::le 9606270119 960625 PDR ADOCK 05000423
.y y v v -
REVO June 10,1996 NSO Oversight Objectives The overall objective of this oversight plan is to provide a critical and objective assessment that MP3 has fully completed its restart plan as an input to NU Executive Committee decision on approving unit restart.
To accomplish this objective, NSO will perform its oversight in accordance with this plan and provide timely assessment to unit management including the identification of startup areas needing increased management attention. This will be done immediately for urgent items and at least weekly. Upon completion of its oversight activities NSO will issue a formal memorandum to the Executive Committee documenting its conclusion regarding MP3's readiness to startup.
i l
l l
)
I I
l l
s I
REVO June 10,1996 SECTION i NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3:
" Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation" This section defines the NSO global evaluation criteria and the plan to assess the specific criteria identified in Section I of the "MP3 Restart Criteria" document approved by corporate management O
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. Q Section 1. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review A. The MP3 Management Global Evaluation Criteria Team displays good communications with
- 1. Operational readiness reviews are consistently high completed in accordance with the standards and approved CMP and Project expectations.
Instructions. Any departures and i
changes from approved documents (Oversite Responsibility:
have been reviewed and approved Executive Director NSO by the MQC, Mllistone) 2.
Deficiencies identifled have been resolved por approved procedures.
Differences in judgment regarding resolution have been satisfactorily resolved.
- 3. The 50.54(f) response provides a complete and accurate perspective on the work performed and the results. There is sufficient basis and data presented to justify a return to service by Unit 3.
4.
The Unit 3 restart plan includes all actions necessary to be completed prior to restart; there is a contro!!ed approval process to assure adequato resolution; and all actions to be completed prior to restart have been properly closed out.
6/10/96 9:20 AM i
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O.
Section 1. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review A.
The MP3 Management
- 5. Management expectations for Team displays good restart have been clearly expressed communications with and communicated to involved consistently high individuals. Assignments, roles and standards and responsibilities are clearly defined expectations and there le a common understanding of what is (Oversite Responsibility:
accomplished and how its Executive Director NSO acceptability will be measured.
Mllistone)
A.
The MP3 Management Unit Specific Evaluallon criteria Team displays good communications with
- 1) Operational Readiness Assess project personnel make interviews appropriate Interview a sample consistently high Reviews complete and accurate, timely decisions based on personnel and attend of appropriate standards and accepted by the Management having the appropriate information.
mansgement and personnel and expectations.
Quality Committee (MQC) on project meetings.
attend a sample of ALL in-scope systems.
Verify personnel conducting management and (Oversight Responsibility:
(Brothers) operational readiness reviews can state project meetings.
Manager - POS) management expectations and quality i
requirements.
l (See Section ll.C.1)
- 2) 50.54f response to the NRC Project personnel make accurate, interviews appropriate Interview a sample is a consensus product of the timely decisions based on having the personnel, attend of appropriate organization. (Harpster) eppropriate Information.
management and personnel, attend a project meetings and sample of l
MQC has provided formal guidance and review MOC guidance management and met with project leaders to discuss documents, project meetings management expectation, and quality
, ind review a a
requirements
' sample of MQC (See Sections ll.C.1 through C.6) guidance documents.
6/10/96 9:20 AM 2
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section LEssential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review A.
The MP3 Management
- 3) Restart plan clearly Project personnel make accurate, Interviews appropriate '
interview a sample Team displays good communicated to all MP3 timely decisions based on having the personnel and attend of appropriate communications with personnel with key milestone appropriate information.
management and personnel and consistently high status presented in an easily project meetings.
attend a sample of standards and understandable manner.
MP3 personnel can discuss key MP3 management and expectations.
(Brothers /
S/U target dates, and major activities project meetings required to get there.
(See Section ll.Al B.
The MP3 staff displays GlobaLEvaluation_Crltada the ability to identify and correct problems with a
- 1) Changes have been implemented in focus on safety issues.
the NU corrective action program that are sufficient to provide high (Oversite Responsibility:
confidence that the revised system Executive Director NSO will prove offective.
Millstone)
- 2) There is method for management l
to overview and monitor the status and effectiveness of the revised corrective actica ptspain.
- 3) Backlog item.i have been properly l
dispositioned as indicated in Section Ill.
d) Externally identified problems or significant deficiencies identifind as a result of on-go'ng work are p operly resolved and the generic implications addressed and closed out.
6/10/96 9:20 AM 3
=
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. 0 Section 1. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation s
Activity Unit Start-up Criterla NSO Key Evaluation Criteria '
NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review B.
The MP3 staff displays Unit Specific Evaluation Criteria the ability to identify and l
correct problems with a
- 1) The results of the ACR Prior to implementation Unit and EAD Review Implementation implementation Plan focus on safety issues, express team are have developed an effective plan to plan upon issue to and any revisions.
Implemented (Brothers) implement the new Five Unit ACR ensure key Interviews (Sample) process at MP3, e.g.:
Implementation activities of peopleinvolved j
- training (initial & lessons learned-other have been with planning.
(Oversite Responsibility:
units).
established (e.g., training, Manager - POS)
- procedure validation & controlled procedure review, action phase-in.
toconform existing
- communications plan.
ACRs to new process,
- plans for self-assessment.
etc.)
- m!!estones, target dates & responsibility develop KPis and support structure for capture Prior to implementation Unit and EAD Review S/A effort and Observe S/A have done an appropriate self-perform a parallel activities and results assessment that the new process is fully assessment of unit and understood and the unit is ready to place EAD Appropriate Sample the process in effect.
Interview management of management, Action plan developed to implement and EAD personnel supervision, and findings of S/A.
workerlevel New ACR process has been placed into Review implementation Sampleof training effect in accordance with the unit documentation including records implementation plan training, subtler guidance Unit and EAD management is monitoring Evaluate the adequacy of 100% of Unit for program performance using the KPis and the process specific sub-tier developed KPI's & trending established established to capture &
guidance for both monitoring development and trend the KPIinformation completion of timely & effective corrective Compare to best industry Full evaluation of action.
practices the adequacy and process capture of KPI 6/10/96 9:20 AM 4
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section 1. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review B.
The MP3 staff displays
- 2) All backlog items identified in Evaluation as defined in Section ill of this NSO staff briefing of Each occurrence the ability to identify and section ill of this plan are Assessment Plan MPS NSO Exec Director correct problems with a complete and accepted by NSO observation of MQC focus on safety issues.
the Management Quality Meetings as non-voting Committee (MQC). (Langen) member.
- 3) Any externally identified NSO will evaluate the problems as they NSO staff briefing of Each Occurrence problems are reviewed by the occur against general criteria above MPS NSO Executive MQC and utilized to assess Director the health of the unit's NSO observation of MQC corrective action program.
Meetings as non-voting (Brothers) member.
C.
The MP3 staff displays Global Evaluation Criteria the ability to perform work safely and maintain
- 1) On-going assessment activities and the plant.
plant activities are conducted in (Oversite Responsibility:
accordance with approved Executive Director NSO procedures.
Mllistone)
- 2) Plant modifications needed prior to restart have been completed and properly closed out.
- 3) Decisions regarding implementation of the restart plan are made by the proper authority and are soundly based on relevant information.
- 4) Backlog items have been properly dispositioned as indicated in Section lit.
6/10/96 9:20 AM 5
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section I. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review C.
The MP3 staff displays Unit Specific Evaluation Criteria the ability to perform work safely and maintain
- 1) Any events which occur
- 1) NSO willevaluate the events as they NSO staff briefing of the plant.
during the current outage are occur against general criteria above MPS NSO Executive properly identified and Director (Oversite Responsibility:
dispositioned by the MQC.
NSO observation of MQC Manager-PQS)
(Brothers)
Meetings as non-voting member
- 2) The AWO backlog is less than
- 2) Evaluation as defined in Section lli of 500 for Priority 1,2 and 3 the NSO Assessment Plan AWO's. (Langan)
- 3) The Scheduto Completion
- 3) Evaluate completion of work activities Reviewcompleted AWOs Review sampleof Etficioney (SCE) goal of 90%
against the work schedule. The against completion completed AWOs is being consistently Schedule Completion Efficiency to be schedule.
against completion achieved. (Langen) consistently 90%.
schedule.
D.
An adequate testing Global Specific Evaluation Critefla program exists to demonstrate 1). A systematic and disciplined equipment operability.
system is in place to control work activities as evidenced by a low (Oversite Responsibility:
number of ACRs regarding Executive Director personnel error, configuration NSO Mllistone) management and proceduro compliance.
- 2) The program to verify system readiness through inspection, reviews and testing is adequate and has been properly irnplemented. The results have been approved by the responsible authority.
6/10/96 9:20 AM 6
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section 1. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of l
Evaluation Review D.
An adequate testing
- 3) Surveillances have been conducted program exists to that are needed by the periodic demonstrate requirements based upon the new equipment operability.
RFO6 dates. The results of these surveillances have been properly dispositioned and approved.
- 4) PDCRs implemented during this outage have been properly closed l
out and needed document revisions training have been completed prior to restart.
D.
An adequate testing Unit Specific Evaluation Crlitt[a program exists to demonstrate
- 1) The Centralized Surveillance
- 1) Evaluation as defined in Section lli of equipment operability.
Tracking Program is in place the NSO Assessment Plan and being run by WP&OM.
(Oversite Responsibility:
Backup programs are in place Manager - PQS) and being run by the respective discipline planners.
(Langen)
- 2) 100% of surveillance's will
- 2) Evaluation as defined in Section lli of NSO staff briefing of be reviewed by the MOC to the NSO Assessment Plan MPS NSO Executive ensure that all surveillances Director will fall within their required NSO observation of MOC periodicity based upon the Meetings as non-voting new RFO6 date. (Langan) member 6/10/96 9:20 AM 7
l
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section I. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation t
l Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of I
Evaluation Review l
E. A conservative operating Global Evaluation Criteria philosophy is being demonstrated by the MP3
- 1) The decision making process l
Staff.
related to Unit 3 restart is controlled and conservative.
I Decisions are made by the (Oversite Responsibility:
responsible authorities and are Executive Director NSO soundly based on relevant Mllistone) information. Management is involved and energizes oversight in significant decisions.
j
- 2) NOVs and NCVs are reviewed and the proposed corrective actions are approved by the MQC as effective and timely in relation to restart.
- 3) Restart related decisions are based upon completion of needed work and are not scheduler driven.
E. A conservative operating Unit Specific Evaluation Criteria NSO staff briefing of MPS NSO Executive philosophy is being Director.
demonstrated by the MP3
- 1) Any NOVs against MP3 are
- 1) Evaluation as defined in Section 111 of Staff reviewed and dispositioned the NSO Assessment Plan NSO observation of MQC by the MQC to ensure that Meetings as non-voting (Oversite Responsibility:
the approved restart criteria member.
Manager - PQS) remain unaffected. (Brothers)
- 2) Any NOVs are reviewed by
- 2) Evaluation as defined in Section 111 NSO staff briefing of the MOC prior to submittal of of the NSO Assessment Plan MPS NSO Executive the 50.54f letter to the NRC.
Director.
(Brothers)
NSO observation of MQC Meetings as non-voting member 6/10/96 9:20 AM 8
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section I. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review Global Evaluation Criteria F.
The plant hardware is in good physical condition and demonstrating reliable
- 1) The program to verify system operation.
readiness through inspection, reviews and testing is adequate (Oversite Responsibility:
and has been properly Executive Director NSO implemented. The results have Millstone) been approved by the responsible authority.
- 2) The plant hardware and structures not involved with Operatioral Readiness Reviews has been verified as being in good condition and capable of supporting reliable and safe plant operation.
- 3) The maintenanco rule requirements are being effectively implemented as of July 10,1996.
- 4) An LCO entry goal has been established and is being monitored that represents an improvement over past performance.
F. The plant hardware is in Unit Snecific Evaluation Critada good physical condition and demonstrating reliable
- 1) All Maintenance Rule (a)(1)
- 1) Evaluation as defined in Section ill of operation.
Systems have an approved the NSO Assessment Plan action plan in place to restore (Oversite Responsibility:
them to (a)(2) status.
Manager-PQS)
(Gerber) 6/10/96 9:20 AM 9
l NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section 1. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review F.
The plant hardware is in
- 2) An unplanned entry into
- 2) Assess the establishmentof the Review the goal for Review the goal and good physical condition LCO(s) goal has been unplanned entry into LCO(s) goalto appropriateness of the the unit's and demonstrating reliable established and performance determine the appropriateness of the goalvalue considering performance.
operation.
against this goalis being goalvalue considering the safety the safety significance of monitored by Unit significance of the affected equipment the affected equipment Management. (Brothers)
(example-reactivity control, inventory (example-reactivity control, barrier effects, post accident control, inventory control, monitoring, emergency power, and barrier effects, post t
secondary plant indications and accident monitoring, hardware.)
emergency power, and secondary plant indications and hardware.)
G. Self Assessment Global Evaluation Criteria i
Capability and Trending Capability demonstrated.
- 1) Department self assessments are timely and consistent with NU (Oversite Responsibility:
guidelines. These assessments Executive Director NSO reflect the spirit of continued Millstone) efforts to improve and to identify and address existing problems impeding progress.
- 2) flecommendations from self assessments have been reviewed i
and management support is evident l
to resolve current problems.
- 3) A means is in place to monitor self assessments and to learn from the experience of other departments i
and to cooperate on resolving common problems.
6/10/96 9:20 AM 10
6 g
s on t
A r
t e n
/r A9 n
e se e
f O
Se Sr ir g
nb m
/
e r
f sr k
u a
t st oo e r
t t
r r c n
s nw n
t a o
e c a
lpe t a r
- a u
n es vd np e
a n e
e u
q eq Wsh o m
l ha t
oe txv m
m nos ll t i
me nd t d d
of a an f
E e oi at ddng r
t an r n t
o e
aeein R
a o e v lee iem y
a s
w s
O po r
ipmrdit e c pc l
r eea S
r it e e p e pi vr i o af t
f De t
n s
Ds msmiv r a tnr esci N
l o6 l
o ep pl neg l
r l
r ab atc t
e Af 9 Af SOSa In e peaf i d
f r
d I
abt eo r
ta s
r st ty ie w
d s
f e se iv niv ie s
o a ec i
dit a
e v
hr r
r f
d n a i r
t at e
o do e c
sr el h r
c ea nd y f
t n at oi l
ad o
s ct t; a. c i r uo o
f n c d
/
ni ht ads s
n s
a r at s
la t a nna ns cn e e as l
u s
i hl ai eSf oaw e
if n
eu t
s e c
e o cL e t
e n
f i
Mla ceA n
o v
oF h biist e
no o
v n c/
lPe r
r n r
n t
g u o p s,o wodc n OE u nS Kt n /p i
a si ea e t
f a iri t
S wme wpoa it t
r m
ea e e s s ta n e st vge sdm r
a N
erh r
nv r
s eet eotir r
of r
e eak e u
r iot r
sin a vpng u s s nr c las nn i
O vf e e
e eh ep oo r
p r
ob b aom ve aa p
Rpw Ramp Ro OMWp ELmlpd e
.ve O r
R e o
lat d
r un f
o n e
ty d
t e
s ytc dw is iv U
o n h
o s N a a
o l
ei elbeam gN so v
r e
t n
rl ri t
t n
A S i
mk r
bt c e e ot ya r
e a a a imd L
e it f o tsl s e
d h cb p r
u/
o of se e
C ia f
r e s e as oh n c r
s ef e r
f r
e cd e
ve df c u, i P
r e
pai eec ue nr r
a t
s o
r or apt dn isise e t
ei r/
net t
u n
i nr n ar o v
nl t
d h T
s i
C e au a
e eu ivo si/p t
ye n it o
t o
oai wl mn t
t enr r nm en r
H s a
n bi o o
r a
o e a
G A lu i
ed amr ivpn o
p a
s s e-d ep e
y r
t ms f
inm v
t ot E it isb ay p
a t
o ic g
r ve dr rb v
a am d o o r
uif c
ly e a e f
u u
I r
e o a
soh i
t, h
t E
l e
n p
pr e xoe a
sn nph n r
S a
y v
e t
r et o e
diRr e
se et a uG
/P R
ep adoi t f t r
t R h e
E n
c a S
s as/
r e
e o
l e np K
e ed co nr o
,k amu if
/
ao c
pn ap r
v v
rd e n i
m E T O
i s
oat oici pe bood t
d
- t, mr c oe nW/n ut t
t a f
s ni n
e/ S n
dc lar oidd s
n V
s pn r
S c
ad,
opa ml eie o e t
e 1
e s d I'
o s ee f
a emt vir md N
p n
O r
e u s
r s e' e am gdivsor eo r
er n 1
er r
t A n ',y per ait sCPPC o n n cen n
S f e oif a r o vce nP yef nies ed sst sl t
f c
P e
in le la' ehe adf s hn er a r np r
a U
Sp'i Kwp MInf U m eAe e a =
Ta L pt o r e
T l
R E g
s l
d n in A
t r
a a
e e a
T e
r i
i iu h
m nc r
t e
s S
e a eqs n
it elp f
s r
r e o
w e
3 e
C ar f
s n
r dl t P
s p
si s e e i t ea oh sb u
f t f is s
nh M
t et ie t t eoss E
r mgs) ms nn a
t O
n lt t
ee S
r i yrs laumm)h I
at l
l e
S it per ms n
n epteh st e s r c f
r No U
d l
ma o o
e a o r
r r
f es pn i
l ouB h s e t
Acq(
At adK c
)
)
e 1
2 S
d g e int d a y
r nt t
i e s l
r n ib t
M y
nTo i)sS ed m itv mne nQ A
i s ad oP 0
t p-c s
A eyy s
2 sii e r t t l
e 9
slii Rg Abb ea aa t n 6
f pp i
leaa sa 9
SCC eM 0
r
/
v 1
O
/
G 6
(
NSO MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O S_ection 1. Essential Elements That Assure Safe Operation Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Evaluation Review l
G. Self Assessment
- 3) All department self-S/A deficiencies and opportunities for Review S/A program and -
Interview all Capability and Trending assessments have been improvement have been appropriately senseownership by department managers l
Capability demonstrated reviewed to ensure that all dispositioned andacceptedbythe department management recommendations have been department.
and basis for disposition adequately dispositioned.
Perform a parallel review Sample Interview of (Enoch) of managementownership FLS and workers and disposition as perceived by S/A team, FLS, worker Deficiencies have been identified on ACRs Reviewcompleted action Review a sample of and opportunities for improvement have been toimprove performance and ACRs and AITTS effected or planned with ownership those actions planned are items anddiscuss estabilshed properly schedufed, the with action owner owner is cognizant and pursuing the improvement, and progress monitored 6/10/96 9:20 AM 12
NU ASSESSMENT MATRIX CONTINUOUSIROUTINE PREVENTIVEIPRE-EMPTIVE PERIODIC CORRECTIVEIREACTIVE INDIVIDUALS &
- 1. INDIVIDUAL CONTINUOUS
- 2. INDIVIDUAL PREVENTIVE
- 3. INDIVIDUAL PERIODIC
- 4. INDIVIDUAL CORRECTIVE WORK GROUPS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
- a. Shift tumover review
- a. Tallboards
- a. Quarterly self essessments
- a. Troubleshooting
- b. Alertness to anomalies
- b. 50.59 safety evaluations
- c. STAR
- c. Job completion walkdowns
- d. 200% accountability at
- d. Independent (Design)
Interfaces verification
- e. STAR-2
- e. Pre & Post job ALARA
- f. Customer feedback Review
- f. Special simulator training SUPERVISION &
- 5. SUPERVISORY
- 6. SUPERVISORY PREVENTIVE
- 7. SUPERVISORY PERIODIC
- 8. SUPERVISORY MANAGEMENT CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENI ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CORRECTIVE ASSESSMENT
- a. Work Observation Program
- a. Contingency planning
- a. Employee Performance
- a. License Event Review
- b. Field supervision
- b. Outage readiness assessment Reviews
- b. Condition Report event reviews
- c. Coaching & counseling
- c. PORC startup review
- b. Pre-SALP & pre INPO Review
- c. Post-evolution critiques
- d. Review of hc;s & test results
- d. Start-up Assessment
- c. Performance Indicator review
- d. NSAB review of plant events
- e. Post outage oview
- d. Process re-engineering
- e. Response to NRC Notice of
- e. Plant tours Violation
- f. NSAB
- f. Response to Audit Findings
- g. Station ALARA Committee INDEPENDENT
- 9. INDEPENDENT
- 10. INDEPENDENT
- 11. INDEPENDENT PERIODIC 12 INDEPENDENT CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT PREVENTIVE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CORRECTIVE ASSESSMENT
- o. OC inspection
- a. ISEG safety assessments
- a. Audits
- a. Independent event reviews by
- b. QAS surveillances
- b. Independent commitment
- b. Performance trending by NSAB ISEG
- c. Customer feedback reviews
- c. NSAB Audits
- b. IRT review of plant events
- c. NSAB Review of NRC submittals EXTERNAL
- 13. EXTERN 6L CONTINUOUS
- 14. EKIERNALEREVENTIVE
- 15. EXTERNAL PERIODIC 16 EXTERNAL CORRECTIVE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
- a. NRC inspector routine
- a. NRC review of safety
- a. NRC SALP
- a. NRC Augmented Inspection inspections evaluation involving an
- b. INPO Evaluations Team
- b. Joint Owners Group routine Unreviewed Safety question
- c. PUC Audit
- b. Notice of Violations inspections
- b. NRC Review of Tech Spec.
- d. JUMA Change Request
- e. ANIInspection
- c. INPO Assist Visit Section I.G.I Attachment
.fune 10,1996 Rev.0
. =. _. _. _.
~_ --. - -
=
I REVO June 10,1996 SECTION 11 NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3:
" improvement Actions Are Completed" This section defines the NSO plan to assess the MP3 improvement actions cited in Section 11 of the "MP3 Restart Criteria" document approved by corporate management 1
i l
l l
l l
t i
i
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O.
ii.C.1: PI-5 System Readiness Reviews Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review Criteria Evaluation 1.
AWO Review
- 1. Backlogged AWO's identified Evaluation as defined in
- 2. All AWOs dispositioned Section lli (F) of NSO 3.
Rovfow and Actions Assessment Plan.
(Oversite Responsibility:
documented in system Manager - PQS) 2.
Design Changes
- 1. Implementation complete Evaluation as defined in
- 2. Retest method / plan complete Section lil (G) of NSO (Oversite Responsibility:
- 3. Walkdown completed Assessment Plan.
Manager - OBV)
Design discrepancios identified l
3.
NCR Review 1.
Select NCRs with "use as is" Evaluation as defined in
" repair", " admin" perform Section 111 (B) of NSO comprehensive review Assessment Plan.
- 2. No undispositioned NCRs open
> 60 days
- 3. No open NCRs affect system (Oversite Responsibility:
readiness Manager - PQS/OBV) 4.
TR Review
- 1. All open TRs reviewed for Evaluation as defined in impact on system readiness Section 111 (F) of NSO (Oversite Responsibility:
Assessment Plan.
Manager - PQS) 5.
Maintenanco Rule Imp 1.
System compliance with rule Evaluation as defined in
- 2. Action plans support S/U Section lli (0) of NSO completion Assessment Plan.
- 3. ID unavailable systems / verify actions (Oversite Responsibility:
Manager - PQS) 6.
EWR Review
- 1. Review all open EWRs eval Evaluation as defined in non-implementation - S/U Section Ill (I) of NSO
- 2. Recommend canceling non-Assessment Plan.
opplicable ACRs
- 3. Refer EWRs - RAC not needed (Oversite Responsibility:
for S/U Manager-PQS/OBV) o,enino n.on ama 1
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O II.C.1: PI-5 System Readiness Reviews Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review Criteria Evaluation i
i 7.
Jumper Bypass
- 1. Evaluation impact of installed Evaluation as defined in J/B on system readiness Section 111 (A) of NSO
- 2. Verify removed any J/B Assessment Plan.
effecting system readiness (Oversite Responsibility:
- 3. All active jumper / bypasses Manager - PQS) evaluated for aggregate impact 8.
Operability 1.
Review outstanding OD's, Evaluation as defined in Determinations JCO's determine complete, in place Section ill (N, Q and Y.3) l compensatory actions of NSO Assessment Plan.
appropriate
- 2. Closure unnecessary OD's (Oversite Responsibility:
Mr. nager - OBV) 9.
Control Room Panel
- 1. No open deficiencies impact Evaluation as defined in Deficiencies readiness goals Section ill (D) of NSO Assessment Plan.
(Oversite Responsibility:
M: nager - PQS1 10.
Pre-Outage Work List 1.
All Engineering pre-outage Engineering Pre-Outage Select systems and verify Sample two systems.
work list items resolved Worklist items resolution is all work / commitments are (Oversite Responsibility:
complete and adequate documented and/or resolved.
Manager - PQS/OBV) l 11.
Work Planned but not
- 1. Assess impact of system work
- 1. Work planned not Document Review Sampling of safety Performed or design items not performed performed identified Personnel Interviews.
significant systems including PMs (example - reactivity
- 2. No operability or system
- 2. Work planned /not control, inventory control, performance performed reviewed barrier effects, post for impact accident monitoring, Operability emergency power and Reportability secondary plant
- Basis for indications / hardware).
(Oversite Responsibility:
Prioritization M; nager - OBV)
System Readiness
- Deferred PM's
- 3. Prepare OSCR for items recommended for completion e se nino n.an Ana p
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O II.C.1: PI-5 System Readiness Reviews Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evnfuntion NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review Criteria Evaluation 12.
AR Review
- 1. Review all open ARs in
- 1. A/Rs identified,
- 1. Review the integrated Review the integrated database, identify items prioritized (What has data base open AIR data base open A/R list required for completion before to be worked pro and list for the past two for the past two years to S/U post start-up).
years to identify A/Rs identify A/Rs required to required to be be completed prior to completed prior to start-up/after start-up for start-up.
a sample of safety
- 2. Identify items for ACR closure
- 2. A/Rs reviewed for
- 2. Review the open A/Rs significant systems / areas l
required prior to S/U Impact to be completed after (example - reactivity Operability start-up for aggregate control, inventory control, Reportability impact on system barrier effects, post e
- Basis for readiness, accident monitoring, (Oversite Responsibility:
Manager - FCS)
Prioritization emergency power and System secondary plant l
Readiness indications / hardware).
- 3. Complete assessment for ARs that effect system readiness
- 4. For non startup issues, evaluate aggregate impact for system readiness i
13.
ACR Hoviews
- 1. Assess all open ACRs Evaluation as defined in
- 2. Identify items required for S/U Section 111 (W) of NSO
- 3. Disposition ACRs not Assessment Plan.
implemented for system (Oversite Responsibility:
readiness impact Manager - PQS) as4nton o.'an au 3
1 MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O li.C.1: PI-5 System Readiness Reviews Activity Start-up Criteria NSO May Evaluation NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review Criteria Evaluation 14.
Punchlist Evaluations
- 1. Reviews: Fuel load, NRC
- 1. Evaluation as defined Inspection items, S/U, in Section lli (Y) Item Abnormal Plant Conditions 2, Section til (J),
Section lil (Y), and Section ill (E) of NSO Assessment Plan.
(Oversite Responsibility:
- 2. Impact on system readiness
- 2. Evaluation as defined M nager-PQS) in Section 111 (Y) of NSO Assessment Plan.
- 3. Verify system readiness
- 3. Evaluation as defined disposition in Section Ill (Y) of NSO Assessment Plan.
15.
Preliminary System 1.
Perform (NUC PI 4) preliminary 1.
Evaluation as defined Walkdown system walkdown for material in Sections ill (C, D, F, condition / housekeeping and) of NSO
- 2. Document each discrepancy on Assessment Plan.
unresolved item report (Oversite Responsibility:
- 3. S/U review team leader reviews Manager - PQS) 16.
Surveillances
- 1. Verify all surveillances 1.
Evaluation as defined complete in Sections !!! (M and
- 2. Verify tech spec affected Y) and V of NSO systems operable, not just Assessment Plan.
available in upcoming cycle
- 3. Identify surveillances required pre-startup
- 4) Verify for completed design (Ov;rsite Responsibility:
changes, surveillance Manager - PQS) procedures are changed.
e s4 nino n.on ama d
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O ll.C.1: PI-5 System Readiness Reviews Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review Criteria Evaluation 17.
System Testing
- 1) Evaluate test plans of PDCRs 1.
Evaluation as defined from MQC list for accuracy in Section 111 (G) of NSO Assessment Plan.
- 2) Determine system testing
- 2. See No.1.
depending on scope of work, design changes and outage duration's
- 3) Verify system testing
- 3. See No.1.
(Oversite Responsibility:
performed and results Manager - PQS) satisfactory
- 4) Document discrepancies in UIR 4.
Deficiencies found are
- 4. Assess that
- 4. Assess by reviewing a processed using the deficiencies found are sample of completed UIR.
processed using the UIRs.
UIR to determine that UIRs are processed in accordance with PI-5.
6/10/96 9:30 AM 5
I l
L MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. 0 i
ll.C.1: PI-5 System Readiness Reviews Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review Criteria Evaluation t
18.
LER Review
- 1. Assessment all LER 1.
LER commitments are 1.
Review of LERs over 1.
100% of LERs commitments /open items identified and being
' past 2 years, and (Ov0rsite Responsibility:
complete tracked develop a list of commitments Manager-OBV) contained in the LERs l
by following the approved procedures.
Compare this list to the list provided by licensing.
2.
LER commitments 2.
Review of LER 2.
100% of address root commitment commitments from cause/ extent of corrective action selected LERs.
condition / generic documents for i
implications, and effective root 7
reflect issues identified cause/ extent of by originating condition / generic document.
Implications and compare to originating document.
- 3. LER commitments are
- 3. Review corrective
- 3. Sample of i
addressed in action plans to commitments.
implementation plans determine if identified and address issues issues are identified appropriately addressed.
- 4. LER commitments are 4.
Field verification, 4.
Sample of fully completed in Interviews, document commitments.
accordance with action reviews to determine i
plans that LER commitments fully completed in accordance with action plans e,4 nina n.on au 6
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. 0 l
II.C.1: PI-5 System Readiness Reviews Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review i
Activity i
Criteria Evaluation 19.
Long Standing System identify " Top 19" listing or 1.
" Top Ten" List of 1., Attend meetings and
- 1. Randomly Attend Issues operator burdens that impact outstanding issues do review documents for meetings and a system readiness.
not impact system resolution of " Top sample review of readiness.
Ten" List for documents for outstanding issues for resolution of " Top l
Impact on system Ten" List for i
readiness.
outstanding issues for Impact on system readiness.
- 2. Operator Burdens List 2.
See Section Ill.C.
(
do not system
^
readiness.
i (Oversite Responsibility:
Manager - PQS) 20.
Other System issues
- 1. Evaluate special issues as Section lli addresses this j
(Oversite Responsibility Minager - OBV)
L f
21.
Final Safety Walkdown 1.
Identify - work performed as a Evaluation as defined in result of identified discrepancy, Section ill (V) of NSO i.
work that was outage related, Assessment Plan.
specific "walkdowns" (form NUC Pl 15)
- 2. Perform " Final System Walkdown"
- 3. Document discrepancies UIR's
- 4. Assess UIR impact on system l
(Oversite Responsibility:
readiness Manager - PQS) 6/10/98 9:00 AM 7
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O II.C.1: Pl-5 System Readiness Reviews Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NSO Method for NSO Extent Of Review Criterla Evaluation 22.
Preparation and
- 1. Review UIRs, present to PVRT, UIR process is adequate Interview appropriate Interview a sample of Processing of material cond - walkdown and issues are personnel (originators, personnel, attend a '
Unrosolved item Report related, Configuration -Design appropriately identified, SRT Leaders, PVRT sample of PVRT meetings Basis /DCM/ Licensing, Admin -
prioritized, dispositioned, members, Unit Project and review documents on Programs and Processes, closed and documented in Manager etc.)
safety significant Training - Industry and Internal accordance with NUC-Pl-5 Document review of UIRs/
systems / areas. (example -
Issues and NUC-PI-8.
Attend PVRT meetings to reactivity control,
- 2. Identify startup and other determine the adequacy inventory control, barrier milestones of the prioritization and offects, post accident
- 3. Identify final disposition for recommended monitoring, emergency ACR, TR, NCR, A/R, Check N/A disposition / closure.
power and secondary
- 4. Closo all UIRs plant indications /
hardware.)
(Oversite Responsibility:
Manager-PQSIOBV) 23.
Preparation of
- 1. System readiness report 1.
Report is consistent Review system Sampling Preliminary and Final prepared with PI-5 outstanding readiness reports Interviews System Readiness items and issues Reports appropriately resolved Attend meetings e
2.
Line KPls are evaluated Review data base.
and judged to be effective
- 3. The integrated Uln
- 2. Presentation to PVRT data base has been completed reviewed and is adequate.
(Oversite Responsibility:
Mznager - OBV)
- 3. Database for UlRs updated s
Afin/OR Q '40 Alut 8
i 1
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED 1
MP3 Restart Criteria ll.A:
A MP3 restart plan is in place which integrates 50.54f actions, hardware issues, other restart criteria actions and restart self assessments.
i Obiective Develop a reasonable level of confidence that the Unit 3 Restart Plan is complete and realistic, is clear with regard to responsibilities and authorities and integrates all related activities.
1 i
Scone Evaluate the MP-3 Restart Plan and associated implementation processes to determine if MP-3 personnel understand the plan and their roles and responsibilities. Verify that the implementation documents provide a well coordinated and controlled process.
I Methodology i
NSO assessment of the MP-3 Restart Plan will include reviews of project plans and instruction, observations of selected meetings and other project activities and interviews of selected project personnel.
)
Oversight Responsibility Plant Quality Services Department.
1 Success Criteria i
e A restart plan is developed, distributed and implemented that integrates and reflects appropriate activities required to support Unit 3 restart. This plan is supported by detailed project schedules which identify key milestones and appropriate manpower loading for all associated tasks or activities. The proposed schedule for implementation of the restart plan is realistic and practical and includes anticipated contingency options.
Roles and Responsibilities are clearly identified and understood by personnel at all levels.
There is " buy-in' on the tasks to be accomplished and the associated schedule.
Implementation of the restart plan is consistent with established policies, processes and procedures.
Deviations from the restart plan are reviewed and approved by the MOC.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 1
l NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED MP3 Restart Criteria ll.B:
Configuration Management Plan (CMP) in place Ob_iective Develop a reasoncble level of confidence that the line organization has adequately planned the activity associated with responding to the NRC 50.54f letter including definitions of tasks, clear assignment of responsibilities, adequate training and defined end products.
Scone Evaluate the CMP and implementing procedures to determine if MP-3 personnel understand the pian and their roles and responsibilities. Verify that the implementation of project activities can be coordinated and controlled Methodology NSO assessment of the CMP will include reviews of project plans and instruction, observations of selected meetings and other project activities and interviews of selected project personnel.
Oversight Resoonsibility Operating Basis Verification Oversight Team.
l l
Success Criteria A CMP is approved by the MQC and is updated and revised as necessary to reflect on-going e
activities. CMP revisions are approved by the MQC.
The CMP is augmented by a series of detailed project instructions (PI)} that are systematic in nature and define how the tasks are to be conducted, coordinatcd and approved. These l
Pts and the method of revising and updating them are approved by the MQC.
i implementation of the CMP is consistent with approved plans, procedures and instructions.
e Deviations are reviewed and approved by the MOC.
l l
l l
l l
j j
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 2
1 NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED l
MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.1:
50.54f complete: Operational Readiness Reviews t
Obiective l
l Develop a reasonable level of confidence that issues identified during the implementation of PI-5, l
MP-3 System Readiness Review, have been reviewed for impact on the affected system:
Verify that conclusions are well founded, defensible and clear.
Verify that impacts on system operability and readiness are determined, and the systems will l
support operation of MP3 with no significant system unavailability's due to identified past problems.
l l
Scone l
This review will include all sources of issues listed in the sistem readiness checklist, Attachment i
1 to PI-5. These are AWOs, design changes, NCRs, TRs, Maintenance Rule implementation, l
EWRs, Jumper Bypasses, Cperability Determinations or JCOs, Control Room Panel Deficiencies, l
Pre-Outage Work Ust Iterns. Work Not Performed in the Outage (rejected OSCRs), Action l
Requirements, ACRs, Punch!ist items, Preliminary and Final System Walkdowns, Surveillances, System Testing, LERs, Abnormal Plant Conditions, Long Standing System issues. A final report l
and memo to executive management will also be reviewed.
Methodoloay Review P1 5, Millstone Unit 3 System Readiness Review, and other project plans and l
instructions, observe selected meetings and other project activities and interview selected project personnel versus their governing directives and the guidelines.
('
Verify, on a sampling basis, that issues effecting operating and design basis and configuration control which are identified have been categorized, reviewed, evaluated for impact on restart and reported. The essential elements of each item in the system readiness reviews include:
Verification that all pertinent issues identified by independent oversight are addressed and i
resolved l
NSO verify that selected issues were reviewed for operability, reportability and system readiness.
NSO verify for selected items that the extent of condition, root causes, generic implications and corrective action:s are developed.
Verify that corrective,,ctions are planned and scheduled for completion in a manner
=
consistent with the significance of the condition and its impact on cafe, reliable plant operation.
Oversiaht Resoonsibility Operating Basis Verification Oversight Team.
4 Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 3
1 MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.1:
50.54f complete: Operational Readiness Reviews (Cont.)
Page 2 of 2 Success Criteria Training and qualification of team members is appropriate for the task and documented as e
specified in NGP 2.26 and P15.
Outstanding issues in each category impacting MP3 within the scope of P15 are included in the review.
Review of the impact of conditions adverse to quality on operability, reportability, system readiness, and Unit restart are thoroughly evaluated and conclusions reached are reasonable and substantial l
Reviews are well documented, traceable and the results approved by responsible authority.
Generic impact, extent of condition and causal factors are consistent and considered in resolution of conditions adverse to quality.
1 1
l l
l l
Rev.O June 10,1996 l
Page 4
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION ll: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.2:
50.54f complete: System Slices Objective Develop a reasonable level of confidence that MP3 has completed thorough evaluations of design basis, licensing basis and plant documentation using the methodology in the Configuration Management Plan and Project instruction (PI) 15, and that conclusions reached in these reviews are clear, substantiated and defensible.
Scone This evaluation willinclude reviews of project plans and instructions, results of source document reviews, field, verifications, assessment of problems for significance, impact on operability, reportability to the NRC, and system readiness, and personnel interviews.
Methodology Observation of field walkdowns on a sampling basis, to determine the degree of conservatism, care and thoroughness being exercised by the workers.
Independent reviews of selected identified issues by NS&O technical experts to determine thoroughness and evidence of attention to detail.
Attendance at working level meetings to verify the meetings are effective.
Reviews of selected problems to verify the impact on MP-3 restart has been effectively determined.
Oversight Resnonsibility Operating Basis Verification Oversight Team.
Success Criteria Documented results of the review include a traceable path of what was considered, why the e
conclusions were made, and clearly document the results.
Technical experts exhibit a " questioning attitude".
Performance of contractors on this task is closely monitored by a responsible NU Liaison, as specified in PI 15.
An evaluation of conditions adverse to quality is performed to determine corrective action and whether the action needs to be completed prior to restart.
Problems are reported through appropriate processes to unit management (i.e., ACRs).
Identified problems are being reported, without bias to their significance.
Workers understand the objectives of the OBVT project, and work in conformance to approved project instructions.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 5
l
~
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.2A:
50.54f complete: Preliminary System Slices Objective Develop a reasonable level of assurance that MP3 has completed evaluations of design basis, licensing basis and plant documentation using the methodology in the Configuration Management Plan and Project Instructions (PI)-4, 5 & 15, and that the resultant conclusions reached are i
I substantiated and defensible.
Scone This assessment includes reviews of project instructions, assessment of problems for significance,. impact on operability, reportability to the NRC, and system readiness, pertaining to Design Basis & Configuration Management.
Methodoloay independent reviews of selected identified issues by experts independent of N S & O e
personnel of the scope of work in the vertical slices, on a sampling basis.
Independent reviews of selected identified issues by N S & O personnel of system readiness reviews (horizontal slice) and independent walkdowns of portions of selected systems.
Review of Project Instructions (approach) for reviews of slices.
Reviews of selected identified problems for significance.
Success Criteria Contractors are trained per NGP 2.26 and PI-15 requirements.
e Documented results of the review include why the conclusions were made, and clearly documented conclusions.
Performance of contractors on this task is closely monitored by a responsible NU Liaison.
The Unit Project Manager conducts independent evaluation of conditions adverse to quality.
Problems which cannot be resolved during the review process are reported through appropriate processes to unit management (i.e., ACRs).
Identified problems are being reported, without bias by observers as to their significance.
l l
Reoortina & Format The results of this assessment will be documented via a SIP.
The format for results will be per QAS 2.03. Relevant results will be identified using three categories:
Fatal Flaw: the findings of the oversight review bring the conclusions of the line report into question.
Weakness: the findings of the oversight review should be factored into the report to make the line report accurate or comprehensive, but the conclusions are still valid.
Enhancement: the findings of the oversight review should be factored in to improve the quality or readability of the line repor*., but the report is accurate without the comments.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 6
1
~
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION ll: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.3:
50.54f complete: Independent Assessment Obiective Provide a reasonable level of confidence that independent assessment is performed per the requirements of PI-11 at appropriate stages of product development, critically evaluate the products, and the results of the assessments are used to assure the quality of project deliverables.
Scope Review the Project Instruction (PI-11) used for independent assessment to determine its adequacy.
Evaluate the significance of issues identified in the assessment reports.
Evaluate the adequacy of corrective actions planned or taken in response to the findings.
Methodology Review, on a sampling basis, reports of completed independent assessments, for e
completeness and thoroughness.
Review, on a sampling basis, actions taken and planned in response to independent l
assessment reports.
Conduct interviews with selected project personnel to determine whether the findings are l
being addressed in a adequate and timely manner.
l Oversight Resoonsibility Operating Basis Verification Oversight Team.
Accentance Criteria l
Independent assessment reports issued as expected by CMP directives.
e Identified issues are reported and reviewed for significance.
Reviews were thorough and comprehensive.
Project deliverables are being improved based upon actions taken in response to recommendations in the independent assessment reports.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 7 l
l
~
~
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLLTED MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.4:
50.54f complete: Interim Configuration Management Controls Obiective Develop a reasonable level of confidence that MP-3 has reviewed configuration related programs, processes and procedures that support safe operation of the plant, impacts of identified discrepancies have been properly determined, and that those process improvements needed to support safe restart and operation of MP-3 have been identified and scheduled for implementation, as specified in PI-10 and the Configuration Management Plan.
Scone Evaluate.the Unit efforts to review existing configuration change programs, processes and e
procedures per PI-10, Phase 1.
Determine whether, at time of restart, Unit 3 will have an effective control process which maintains the plant configuration as described in design and licensing basis documents.
Validate the configuration management process model developed by the CMT for monitoring and verifying the effectiveness of the configuration management process, including KPI's, using sampling of past documents identifying performarae problems at MP-3 and knowledge of leading industry performers.
Methodology Using the problem list and the model for configuration manageme'st independently developed by NSO in Section ll.C.5, review the recommended process changes developed by the CMT to develop a reasonable assurance that the identified problems will be addressed.
Review plans for implementing the identified process changes for completeness and to develop a reasonable assurance that they can be implemented in a controlled manner.
Review the approach used and compare the results with other units.
Review the performance indicators developed by the CMT versus proven practice indicators, by contacting good performing nuclear units and through interviews and surveys.
Review the process models and KPI's developed by the CMT for configuration management processes at all four Connecticut nuclear units, through comparison with industry documents, to ensure they are likely to identify future configuration management performance problems.
Oversight Resoonsibility Operating Basis Verification Oversight Team.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 8
MP3 Restart CEteria li.C.4:
50.54f complete: Interim Configuration Management Controls Page 2 of 2 (Cont.)
Success Criteria Weaknesses of past processes for configuration control have been identified, assessed and are well understood.
An approach is defined and implemented to revise procedures which ensure the weaknesses previously identified are not repeated.
Implementation of new procedures is well planned and controlled, to include communications, training and documentation, review and comment.
Key performance indicators are established which will indicate the effectiveness of the configuration control processes, procedures and programs.
l Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 9
1 t
l NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED l
l l
MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.5:
50.54f complete:
Root Cause (MP3 Specific) and l
Vulnerability Assessment l
l Obiective i
Develop a reasonable level of confidence that the line organization has reviewed issues identified l
over the past two years by MP-3, regulators, oversight, INPO and other outside sources, has determined the reasons for the issues, as specified in PI-2 and the Configuration Management Plan.
Scone Evaluate the review completed by MP-3, including internally and externally identified issues, the development of causes which led to the problems identified and the recommendations for actions which are made based upon the results.
l l
Methodology l
Develop a list of problems through independent review by NSO, sampling of sources of identified problems impacting MP-3 over the past two years, (e.g., PDCRs, B/J's, Audits, Surveillances, NRC Inspection Findings and ACR 7007 issues.
I I
Compare the list of issues identified with the list developed by the MP-3 organization.
l Review the root cause evaluation of identified issues for accuracy, completeness and technical adequacy.
Oversight Resoonsibility Operating Basis Verification Oversight Team.
Success Criteria l
Documentation exists to demonstrate that the reviews were thorough and complete.
Causes identified by the RCE Team are well founded, correlate with the data collected, and l
are found to be reasonable.
Sources of information consulted for weaknesses are compliance and appropriate for the time frame reviewed by the RCE Team.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 10
~
~
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION ll: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETED 1
l MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.6.A:
50.54f complete: Independent Vertical Slice Review l
l Obiective Determine whether the reviews conducted by Plant and Engineering Groups provide adequate basis to conclude that the units Operating Basis, Design Basis, and Licensing Basis and consistent and that no significant programmatic issues exist.
l Scone l
l A vertical slice inspection will be conducted on a system for previously reviewed. This review will cover the licensing basis, design basis, operating basis and physical configuration I
of the plant system.
A similar, vertical slice inspection will be conducted on a previously unreviewed safety significant system.
l Methodoloay Review operations, design and licensing areas using the type of vertical slice review specified in NRC Inspection Modules such as SSFI's. The review scope of the three areas will be:
Ooerations l
Operating Procedures - Normal, Emergency, and Abnormal Alarm Response Procedures Surveillance Procedures -IST and Technical Specifications Maintenance and l&C Procedures Training Procedures - Lesson Plans, Handouts l
Actual Plant Configuration 1
l Design System Descriptions Calculations Specifications Drawings Safety Evaluations l
Programs - EQ, High Energy Line Break, GL 89-10, etc.
Ucensino
- UFSAR l
Licensing Responses - GLs, IEBs, correspondence.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 11
i 1
MP3 Restart Criteria li.C.6.A:
Independent Vertical Slice Review (Cont.)
~
Page 2 of 2 j
Licensino (Continued)
+
SER(s) e IREP, ISAP l
Two distinct approaches will be used in the review:
l
(
(a)
Verify continuity of several critical system parameters identified in the UFSAR, e.g., pump i
flow rate. This parameter will be checked in the affected documents in the three areas
]
(i.e. the value will be confirmed in the UFSAR, Vendor Specifications, Operations Procedures, Surveillance Procedures, Calculations, etc.).
If the critical value is used consistently in the various documents, the critical parameter usage will be judged acceptable.
(b)
The degree of commitment follow-through will be verified using a review of various documents and an inspection of actual plant configuration to identify commitments and trace the commitment through to full implementation.
Technical Review Plans (TRPs) will be developed and used as guides to conduct the assessment.
Oversight Responsibility Operating Basis Verification Oversight Team.
Success Criteria Sufficient evaluation has been completed to adequately confirm or explicitly negate the conclusions of the CMP vertical slice review. Confirmation will be demonstrated by finding only discrepancies similar in type and number to those found in the CMP vertical slice review and that no new programmatic issues / weaknesses are identified.
Explicit negation of the conclusions of the CMP vertical slice review will occur if significant discrepancies are confirmed that result in:
An inoperable system; or Indication of a new and significant programmatic breakdown.
ACRs of appropriate significance level will be issued based on the results.
l l
Rev.O l
June 10,1996 Page 12
i
(
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ITEMS ARE COMPLETE MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.6.B:
Independent Review of Plant Modifications (PDCRs) 1 Objective Determine the reviews conducted by Plant and Engineering Groups provide adequate basis to conclude that the Units Operating Basis, Design Basis and Licensing Basis are consistent and that no significant programmatic issues exist.
Scone in-depth independent review of major Plant Design Change Records (PDCRs) will be performed.
The PDCRs are purposely chosen to encompass multi-systems and multi-disciplines. Proposed PDCRs are:
Revise the Containment Building from subatmospheric to atmospheric pressure Revise Emergency Diesel Sequencer Loading e
Modification to the Supplementary Leak Collection System Fast transfer from main to reserve transformer Methodoloav l
Review the above PDCRs and identify.
all systems / components / structures that affected by the change e
all configurations affected by the change i
all operating bases that were affected by the change e
all licensing bases affected by the change e
any areas that may have been affected and not addressed by the change e
Perform a review of the Configuration Management Documents (i.e., drawings, calculations, specifications, FSAR, surveillance test procedures, operating procedures, training programs etc.)
to verify that all the affected documents were updated to reflect the change.
l Field verify (where practical) to insure that the as built documentation reflects the as installed j
condition.
l Pursue any areas of omission identified in step 1 and identify Configuration Management Documents that were affected and not addressed by the PDCR.
Prepare a report that describes the scope of the review, the process used, the qualification of personnel, and the results of the above activities.
l Oversicht Resoonsibility Executive Director, Nuclear Station, Safety and Oversight Millstone Station.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 13
MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.6.B:
50.54f complete: Configuration Assurance (Cont.)
Page 2 of 2
~
Success Criteria Sufficient evaluation has been completed to adequately confirm or explicitly negate the conclusions of the CMP PDCR reviews. Confirmation will be demonstrated by finding only discrepancies similar in type and number to those found in the CMP reviews and that no new programmatic issues / weaknesses are identified.
Explicit negation of the CMP reviews will occur if significant discrepancies are confirm that i
result in:
An inoperable system Indication of a new and significant programmatic breakdown.
ACR's of appropriate significance level will be issued based on the results.
i I
i Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 14
f NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ITEMS ARE COMPLETE MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.6.C: -
50,54f complete - Confiouration Assurance Obiective i
To objectively determine the adequacy of the configuration management nrogram and provide feedback in a timely manner to identify the need for and to monitor the effectiveness of j
a program.
Scone Develop a configuration management assurance process to continually monitor tha configuration management program performance.
This includes a process outline, and development of guidelines for various process tools such as monitoring of periodic self assessment, periodic in-depth peer reviews and key performance indicators.
Methodoloov The configuration assurance process is being developed using a structured methodology consisting of data collection, data analysis, and evaluations. Data collection consists of review of upper tier policy and program documents goveming Configuration Management and recent assessment reports such as SALP report, QA Audit reports, self-assessments and root cause analyses, related to Configuration Management issues. Data will also be collected through interviews of selected management and staff personnel of various organizations with responsibilities for maintaining configuration control.
Interview questions will cover the understanding and assessment of the configuration control process in their respective organizations.
The collected data will be analyzed to determine important areas in the configuration control process, key activities in those areas, and the organizations responsible for those activities.
Data obtained from assessment reports will be used to identify configuration control issues. The results of this analysis will be used in identifying configuration control activities for development of performance indicators, developing criteria for selecting organizations for which periodic self-assessments should be conducted, and identifying criteria for selecting process areas to be considered for in-depth peer reviews.
Oversight Resoonsibility Executive Director, Nuclear Safety and Analysis Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 15
MP3 Restart Criteria ll.C.6.C: -
50,54f complete - Confiouration Assurance (Cont.)
Page 2 of 2 Success Criteria Attain and maintain a high level of confidence that the Configuration Management Program is being effectively utilized and monitored, that it is on a path of continuous improvement, Line management and the oversight organization are continually aware of the performance of l
plant operators, maintenance and engineering personnelin maintaining control of plant design l
and operational configuration l
l t
l l
1 I
i 1
l l
l i
l I
l
(
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 16
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETE MP3 Restart Criteria ll.D:
An assessment will be performed to ensure that -the organization understands the reasons for the current performance decline. Those aspects that should be part of the MP3 restart criteria are identified by the executive committee and completed by the MOC.
Obiective Confirm that the necessary action has been taken to prevent the reoccurrence of the same or similar problems in the future Verify that the generic implications and issues associated with the identified root causes have e
been properly addressed and the corrective action is timely and effective Assess the means identified to monitor the effectiveness of the action taken.
Scone The focus of the oversight review will be on the completeness and adequacy of the actions taken in response to the report conclusions and recommendations.
The charter, team composition and associated implementation of this task will not be specifically reviewed because the activity is (a)
Directed by an Executive Director of NS&O: and (b)
Closely monitored by senior reviewers reporting to the Nuclear Subcommittee of the NU Board of Trustees.
Methodology Review the final report to assure a clear understanding of the identified root causes and potential generic implications.
Review relevant documents and interview affected parties to assess the completeness and l
adequacy of the actions taken to address the reports conclusions and recommendations.
Oversight Resoonsibility Executive Director, Nuclear Station, Safety and Oversight Millstone Station.
Success Criteria Action on the final report addresses each of the root causes in a timely and adequate manner.
The actions reflect a clear understanding of the report's conclusions and recommendations.
Actions requiring completion prior to restart are appropriate, clearly articulated, completed and properly documented.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 17
MP3 Restart Criteria ll.D:
An assessment will be performed to ensure that the Page 2 of 2 organization understands the reasons for the current performance decline. Those aspects that should be part of the MP3 restart criteria are identified by the executive committee and complete,d by the MOC. (Cont.)
The generic implications of the report and issues associated with the root causes are identified and corrective action to address potential issues and weaknesses are complete and adequate.
Means are identified and implemented to monitor the effectiveness of the action taken and establish confidence the same or similar problems do not recur.
The report conclusions and action taken are accurately reflected in the restart document and in submittals to the NRC. Longer term actions not yet complete are well specified and specific schedules are established for completion.
l i
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 18 1
~
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETE MP3 Restart Criteria ll.E.1:
A MP3 specific root cause will be performed which takes the
{
specific problems found at MP3 (The Virgilio inspection items plus the RSS/QSS and the AFW GDC 57 values) and identifies the MP3 specific causes for these problems. Any generic implications will be resolved. The corrective actions for this review (in addition the 7007 report) will be in place.
{
Note: This item is the same as item II.C.5 1
1 Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 19
NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP3 RESTART SECTION 11: IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS ARE COMPLETE MP3 Restart Criteria ll.E.2:
A Root Cause will be performed to assess the reasons for.the failure of the QAS organization to identify the design control problems that were occurring within the organization.
Objective The corrective actions for this review (in addition to the 7007 report) will be in place.
Assure adequate identification and understanding exists for those specific aspects of the NU Oversight activities that resulted in the failure to identify the pattern and significance of Unit 1 FSAR inaccuracies.
Assure that appropriate corrective actions, to preclude the occurrence of such failures in j
e the future, have been identified and implemented.
I l
Scone This activity will review the root cause assessment of oversight programs and practices to determine:
adequacy of associated root cause determinations; e
extent and effectiveness of action taken to correct relevant adverse conditions; e
methods implemented to monitor on-going activities to identify related operational e
problems, and specific and generic weaknesses in programs and processes.
Methodology (a)
Review the scope and implementing directives associated with the root cause determination and team member qualifications; (b)
Review final report; (c)
Assess corrective action implementation through interview, document review and direct observation; and (d)
Assess actual / potential success of corrective action implemented or to be implemented.
)
Oversiaht Resnonsibility
~
l Executive Director, Nuclear Station, Safety and Oversight Millstone / External Organization.
Rev.O l
June 10,1996 Page 20
MP3 Startup Criteria Section ll.E.2:
A Root Cause will be performed to assess the reasons for Page 2 of 2 the failure of the QAS organization to identify the design control problems that were occurring within the organization. (Cont.)
Success Criteria l
The charter accurately describes the problem.. There is high confidence that if the charter is properly implemented the final report will identify the root causes for the known failures.
Team activities include consideration of known and relevant documents including internal l
and external audits and assessments.
The team composition, number and qualifications are commensurate with completion of a quality product on schedule. Team members have sufficient independence from the i
activities and programs being addressed.
implementation of the team's activity are consistent with the charter and specified
[
e l
objectives, Final report identifies the root causes for the known failures and provides sufficient e
discussion and data to allow the reader to share the conclusions and have a clear j
understanding of what must be corrected to prevent recurrence of problems including any l
i generic implications.
Action on the final report addresses each of the root causes in a timely and adequate l
e manner. Actions prior to restart, if any, are clearly identified and appropriate, and are l
properly completed and closed out.
Means are identified and implemented to monitor the effectiveness of the corrective action to gain assurance that in the future the same or similar problems are not occurring.
I i
e i
l l
l l
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 21 3
MP3 Restart Criteria ll.F:
The Generic Questions prepared by the Nuclear Officers will be Page 2 of 2 addressed in a separate report which will be approved by the Executive Director (Cont.)
~
Success Criteria Documented objective results of the root cause evaluations, corrective actions, generic program changes and demonstrated sound practices, consistently performed in a successful and professional manner, establish a foundation which provides for safe operation and future performance improvement.
Key performance indicators will be developed and used for each activity and program, a configuration assurance program will be implemented, and elements of the Nuclear Excellence program dealing with employee concerns will be implemented.
i Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 23
~ _ - - -.. - ~ -. _ -.. _... _
REVO June 10,1996 SECTION lli NSO ASSESSMEllT PLAN FOR MP3:
" Plant Hardware-Critical Backlog" l
This section defines the NSO plan to assess the MP3 Restart Plan for Plant hardware Critical Backlogs cited Section ill of the "MP3 Restart Criteria" document approved by corporate management Responsibility: As defined in document.
i I
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Mey Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria A)
Bypass Jumpers
- 1) Allinstalledjumpers All Jumpers have been Review B/Js to be open at 100% of allopen B/Js to reviewed reviewed by unit startup and determine that be reviewed.
- 2) Totalinstalled <30 management and theless criteria are satisfied.
Completed July 1,1996 than 30 B/Js installed Responsibility: Enoch present no orlittle operator (Oversite burden; or significant Responsibility:
system impact Manager PQS)
(Essential Element II.C.1) i
- 3) Total > 2 cycles old < 11 Less than 11 B/Js are Review B/Js to be open at 100% of allopen B/Js to greater than 2 Cycles old.
startup and determine that be reviewed.
(Cycle as defined by unit) criteria are satisfied.
Operators concur that the Interview operators to Sample of operators and remaining open B/Js determine expectations /
operations manager present no orlittle operator assessment of the outstanding burden (Essential Elements B/Js 1.A&l.C)
- 4) A schedule will be Schedule for B/J removal Review B/Jimplementation Sample of Two (2) B/Js developed which identifies has been established in the schedule forincorporationinto the planned removal date units management action the management action for all remaining jumpers program (e.g., AITTS),
program.
schedule is reasonable, Interview individuals and ownership ofIndividual B/J performing groups to ascertain removalis established, and ownership and clear the schedule expectations understanding of expectations are understood by for B/J removal.
performing groups (Essential Elements 1.A. l.C and ll.C.1)
F 6/10/96 9:31 AM 1
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Statt-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria A)
Bypass Jumpers Management of the schedule interview management and Interview an appropriate Cont.
for B/J removal, including observe management activities sample of the prioritization, installation of in B/J schedule management.
management team; new B/Js is evident, Review B/J documentation.
Observe an appropriate systematic and in sample of management accordance with approved meetings.
procedures (e.g., 50.59, Reviewdocumentationof a management reviews, sample of safety significant etc.)(Essential Elements I.A, B/Js (example -reactivity I.C and li.C.1) control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant Indications / hardware.)
B/J removal process is in Review of closed out B/J's.
Sample based on total compliance with the population.
procedural / programmatic requirements as well as engineering and operations review is thorough and adequate. (Essential Element II.C.1)
No B/Js installed that should Review installed B/Js to 100% of installed B/J's be permanent installed determine If these should be equipment.
permanent design changes.
Interview cognizant system engineers to evaluate decision making process used to make the permanent / temporary decision.
j G/10/96 9:31 AM 2
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria A)
Bypass Jumpers B/J's are appropriately Plant and field walkdowns and 5 safety significant B/J's Cont.
Instaffed including procedure'/ plan reviews.
(example -reactivity contingency plans in-place.
control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant Indications / hardware.)
B)
without dispositions 140 totalopen NCRs, as well NCRs and tracking Completed June 28,
- 2) Totalopen < 140 as zero (0) NCRs open for mechanisms.
1996 greater that 60 days without (Oversite being dispositioned and Responsibility:
reviewed in accordance with Manager PQS) program requirements.
Undispositioned NCRs have Review of undispositioned Appropriate sample of been appropriately evaluated NCRs on safety significant undispositioned NCRs on for operability, reportability systems / areas.
safety significant and Substantial Safety Interview appropriate personnel system / areas (example-Hazard determinations.
to determine adequacy of these reactivity control, inventory Review impact of open reviews.
control, barrier effects, NCRs on safety significant post accidenimonitoring, systems / areas.
emergency power and secondary plant indications / hardware.)
6/10/96 9:31 AM 3
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. 0 Section Ill: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs I:
Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Mey Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criterla B)
NCRs Cont.
1.
NCRs dispositioned 1.
Review NCRs on safety "Use As is, Repair, significant systems / areas l
Admin., or Other" that dispositioned "Use As is, may have changed plant Repair, Admin., or Other' to P
design documents or identify those that may j
procedures are have changed plant design identified.
documents or procedures.
- 2. Affected design documents or 2.
Review affected design procedures reflect NCR documents or procedures disposition is reflected to ensure NCR disposition and if not reflected the is reflected and if not discrepancy is identified.
reflected the discrepancy is identified.
(Essential Element II.C.1)
Dispositions of NCRs are Evaluation of closed NCR Appropriate sample of technically adequate and dispositions.
NCRs closed within the fully address the last two years to determine nonconforming condition.
adequacy of dispositions, and that the nonconforming condition is addressed.
6/10/96 9:31 AM 4
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criterla C)
Operator All operator burdens are interview of Operations Interview a sample of Burdens appropriately identified.
Department personnel.
Operations Department prioritized Documentreviewof the personnelon all shifts.
Completed July 1,1996 dispositioned/ closed and operator burden / operations Review sample documents Respons:bility: Pinkowitz documented.
Impact list.
on safety significant (Oversite Communicated to the Attend meetings where thes3 systems / areas. ( example -
t Responsibility:
appropriate operator burdens are discussed reactivity control, inventory Manager FQS) personnet/ organizations.
and/or dispositioned/ closed to control, barrier effects, determine the adequacy of the post accident monitoring, prioritization and emergency power and disposition / closure.
secondary plant 1
indications / hardware.)
Appropriate sample of meetings.
- 1) 5 scheduled burdens Less than 5 operator Document Review.
100% of open operator remaining burdens remaining open, burdens.
D)
MCB 1.
MCB deficiency Interview of Operations Interview a sample of Deficiencies identification process.
Department personnel.
Operations Department To determine all MCB Document review of the MCB personnel on all shifts.
Completed July 1,1996 Deficiencies are deficiency list.
Review sample documents Responsibility: Pinkowitz appropriately identified, Attend meetings where these on safety significant (Oversite prioritized MCB Deficiencies are systems / areas. ( example -
Responsibility:
dispositioned/ closed and discussed and/or reactivity control, inventory Manager PQS) documented.
dispositioned/ closed to control, barrier effects, 2.
Open MCB deficiencies determine the adequacy of the post acciderit monitoring, have little or no impact prioritization, disposition / closure emergency power and on system operability.
and system operability impact secondary plant 3.
Communicated to the review..
Indications / hardware.)
appropriate Appropriate sample of personnel / organizations.
meetings.
(Essential Element ll.C.1)
- 1) 0 deficiencies due to repair No deficiencies greater than Document Review.
100% of open MCB backlog > 14 days old 14 days old due to repair deficiencies.
backlog.
6/10/96 9:31 AM 5
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria E.
Abnormal Plant Abnormal plant condition Interview of Operations interview a sample of Condillon identification process. To Department personnelas well Operations Department.
determine all abnormal plant as system engineers.
personnelon all shifts as (Oversite conditions are appropriately Documentreviewof the wellas system engineers.
Responsibility:
identified, prioritized abnormal plant conditions list.
Review sample documents Manager PQS) dispositioned/ closed and Attend meetings where these on safety significant documented and abnormal plant conditions are systems / areas. ( example -
communicated to the discussed and/or reactivity control, inventory appropriate dispositioned/ closed to control, barrier effects, personnel / organizations.
determine the adequacy of the post accident monitoring, prioritization and emergency power and disposition / closure.
secondary plant Indications / hardware.)
Appropriate sample of meetings.
- 1) 50.59s complete as 1.
50.59 reviews complete 1.
Review list to ensure open Review AOP's to ensure required for open abnormal plant abnormal plant conditions that all the open abnormal conditions.
have a 50.59 review.
plant conditions are 2.
Review AOP's to ensure addressed and a 50.59 2.
Abnormal plant they cover abnormal plant review has been conditions are governed conditions.
completed.
by AOP's.
50.59 reviews for abnormal Review the documentation of Sample of the sign!ficant plant conditions are associated with the 50.59.
systems / areas ( example-i adequate.
reactivity control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant indications / hardware.).
Include evaluation of performers qualifications.
6/10/96 9:31 AM 6
MP3_ START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criterla E.
Abnormal Plant Abnormal plant conditions Review abnormal plant Sample of the significant Condition Cont, have little or no impact on conditions' associated with a systems / areas ( example-system readinoss.
specific system to determine reactivity control, inventory (Essential Element Section the impact on system control, barrier effects, ll.C.1) readiness.
post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant Indications / hardware.) to review abnormal plant conditions associated with a specific system to determine the impact on l
system readiness.
F.
AWO Backlog Workitems are appropriately Review trouble reports and Sample of TR's and AWOs identified, prioritized AWOs.
to evaluate proper Completed June 28, dispositioned/ closed and Perform significant safety prioritization.
1996 documented. (Essential system walkdowns to identify Walkdown 2 safety Responsibility: Langan Element II.C.1) hardware deficiencies.
significant systemstareas.
(Oversite Interview unit personnel to
( example-reactivity Responsibility:
determine breadth of control, inventory control, Manager PQS) knowledge of prioritization barrier effects, post criteria.
accident monitoring, emergency power and l
secondary plant Indications / hardware.).
Interview operations, work planning and maintenance personnel.
- 1) All priority 1,2 and 3s Priority 1,2, and 3s are Review priority 1,2 and 3 Review sample of priority reviewed adequately reviewed to TR's/AWOs to specified criteria.
1,2 and 3 TR's/AWOs to specified criteria.
specified criteria.
- 2) Total < 500 Total open is less than 500.
Review data base to ensure Review data base.
(Essential element I.C.2) totalis less than 500.
)
6/10/96 9:31 AM 7
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section III: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria F.
AWO Dacklog
- 3) No safety significant items No safety significant items Review backlog.
100% of significant safety Cont.
are in the backlog.
system / areas. ( example -
(Essential eierent li.C.1) reactivity control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant indications / hardware.).
G.
Design Changes Design change process Review completed design Sample of significant revision (Retest method / plan change documentation safety system / areas.
Completed July 1,1996 is complete; Turnover packages to ensure all (example -reactivity Responsibility: Andren walkdowns completed with applicable attributes are control, inventory control, (Oversite design discrepancies properly completed in barrier effects, post Responsibility:
Identified, appropriately accordance with the DCM or accident monitoring, Manager PQSIOBV) resolved). Design changes specified design control emergency power and are appropriately processed process.
secondary plant in accordance with the DCM indications / hardware.)
and/or specified design Ensure that two systems control process.
are from included systems in section it!-U.
- 1) 0 open > 90 days No design change Data base review.
100% review of completed completion documents are open greater design change documents than 90 days after completion in accordance with the DCM and/cr specified design control process. (Review for FSAR, Tech. Spec., DBDP and TRM updates)
(Essential Element li.C.1) 6/10/96 9:31 AM 8
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria G.
Design Changes Review closed AWOs to Review closed AWOs (except Review sample of the last identify where design PM Type) to identify where two years of closed AWOs changes may have occurred.
design changes may have (except PM type)on safety occurred. To identify whether significant systems / areas (
(Essential Element II.C.1) associated design change example -reactivity documents (e.g., PDCR, DCN, control, inventory control, PDDS, RIE, PMR, DDR, barrier effects, post E&DCR, Unsat items, DMR, accident monitoring, PDCE. DCR, Design emergency power and Calculations, TRM Change, Set secondary plant t
PointChange MEPL) reflect indications / hardware.) to the design condition.
Identify where design changes may have occurred. Toidentify whether associated design change documents (e.g.,
PDCR, DCN, PDDS, RIE, PMR, DDR, E&DCR, Unsat items, DMR, PDCE, DCR, Design Calculations.
TRM Change, Set Point Change, MEPL) reflect the design condition.
H.
D8DP
- 1) 0open 1.
Discrepancies are 1.
Assess the completeness 100 %
Discrepancies identified.
of DBDPs Review Documents Interviews Completed July 1,1996 Responsibility: Andren (Ovarsite Responsibility:
Manager OBV) 2.
DBDP discrepancies 2.
Document review for Sample have been evaluated for thoroughness /
Operability /Reportability.
completeness
- Interviews 6/10/96 9:31 AM 9
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria H.
DBDP 3.
Resolution of DBDP 3.
Document Review for Sample Discrepancies discrepancies are timeliness, adequacy
. Interviews Cont.
adequate (reasonable time, extent of condition).
4.
Resolution addresses 4.
Document review Sample Interviews the extent ofissue, genericimplications I.
Engineering
- 1) E&DCRs reviewed The system that identifies Review of documents (e g.,
Sample of significant Backlog
- 2) PMRs reviewed the eng!neering backlog is E&DCRs, PMRs, S&W start up safety system / areas.
- 3) Alls &Ws/u adequate. Engineering recommendations, and start up (example - reactivity recommendations reviewed backlog items (E&DCRs, unsats).
control, inventory control,
- 4) Startup unsats reviewed PMRs, EWRs, all S&W start Attend meetings where these barrier effects, post up recommendations, and items are appropriately accident monitoring, Completed June 14, start up unsats) are identified, prioritized, reviewed, emergency power and 1996 appropriately identified, dispositioned/ closed and secondary plant (Oversite prioritized, reviewed, documented do determine the indications / hardware.).
Responsibility:
dispositioned/ closed and adequacy of closure.
Manager PQS) documented. (Essential elements I.B.2, ll.C.1)
- 5) No operability concerns No operability concerns for Review of documents E&DCRs, Sample of significant open backlog items.
PMRs, S&W start up safety system / areas.
recommendations, and start up (example-reactivity unsats.
control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant indications / hardware.).
6/10/96 9:31 AM 10
l MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section Ill: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria l
1.
Engineering Personnel performing Review E&DCRs, PMRs, S&W Sample of significant Backlog Cont.
operability determinations start up recommendations, and safety system / areas.
are qualified in accordance start up unsats. to determine (example-reactivity with appropriate procedures.
personnel performing control, inventory control, operability determinations are barrier effects, post qualified in accordance with accident monitoring, appropriate procedures.
emergency power and secondary plant indications / hardware.).
J.
NRC Inspection
- 1) All addressed /no operability The adequacy of the NRC Review NRC inspection reports 100% of NRC inspection issues questions (Completed Inspection issues for the last two years to identify reports for the last two (Virgi!!o/UOlst 6/21/96) Responsibility:
Identification process is NRC issues (NOVs, UOls, IFis, years to identify NRC IFis)
Temple adequate. NRCinspection NCVs).
Issues (NOVs, UOls,IFis
- 2) Generic letter 96-01, issues are identified, NCVs).
Completed June 21, Testing of Safety Related prioritized, tracked to closure Review 100% of Virgilio 1996 (1)
Logic Circuits, reviewed and adequately documented NRC inspection team Responsibility: Temple and issues addressed and represent no operability
- items.
(Completed 7/1/96) questions. (Essential Completed July 1,1996 Responsibility: Gerber elements 1.E.1,2 and ll.C.1)
Responsibility: Gerber
safety grade interlocks Manager PQS)
(Completed 7/1/96)
Responsibility: Gerber Evaluation and response to Review NU responses to NRC Sample review NU the issue is complete, inspection reports for the last responses to NRC appropriate and two years to identify NRC inspection reports for the comprehensive, including issues (NOVs, UOls, IFis, last two years to identify appropriate generic / global NCVs).
NRC issues (NOVs, UOls, impact determined by extent IFis, NCVs).
of condition review.
Action plan commitments Review action plan Sample the identified have been properly indicated commitments are being commitments.
in the work management adequately tracked.
system.
6/10/96 9:31 AM 11
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criterla K.
Employee
- 1) No operability questions Current unresolved Review current unresolved 100% of current Concerns employee concerns do not employee concems.
unresolved employee contain any operability concems.
Completed June 21, issues.
1996 Responsibility: Brothers (Oversite Responsibility:
Manager PQS)
L MEPL
- 1) 100% validation of The validation process to Documentation review of Sample of significant component ID: vs.
identify, disposition /close, component identification versus safety system / areas.
approved MEPL track and document all approved MEPL evaluations.
(example -reactivity Completed July 1,1996 evaluations discrepancies between the control, inventory control, Responsibility: Andren
- 2) 100% disposition of all MEPL Evaluation and the barrier effects, post (Oversite design or administreive component ID is adequate.
accident monitoring, Responsibility:
discrepancies emergency power and Manager PQS) secondary plant indications / hardware.).
Specific attention paid to MEPL Evaluations performed during current outage period.
MEPL Evaluations are Documentation review oflast Sample of significant comprehensive and valid.
two years of MEPL evaluations.
safety system / areas.
(example - reactivity control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant Indications / hardware.).
Specific attention paid to MEPL Evaluations performed during current outage period.
6/10/96 9:31 AM 12
MP_3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criterla M.
Survelliance
- 1) Programin place The Survel!!ance Tracking Review documents required by Sample of surveillances Tracking program process is survelliance tracking program.
performed on safety adequate all Surveillances (Master tracking list, significant systems / areas.
Completed may 10,1996 are appropriately identified, Commitments made to resolve (example - reactivity Responsibility: Langan prioritized, and/or tracked in the NOV, and the Express team control, inventory control, (Oversite accordance with program
!' ems) barrier effects, post Responsibility:
requirements.
accident monitoring, and Manager PQS)
Program adequately secondary plant addresses NOV indications / hardware.).
commitments / items from the include in sample event express team.
driven required Specific items:
surveillances.
- f. taster Test List in place; input / Revisions to the e
MTL are controlled; Controls are tied to the e
Surveillance Schedule;
. Schedule reflects the MTL; Surveillance frequency e
between Tech Spec and MTL and Surveillance Schedule; e
No surveillances scheduled in the grace period for the remainder of the cycle; and Backup programs are in place and run by l
discipline planners.
l (Essential elements I.D.1 and 2; ll.C.1) 6/10/96 9:31 AM 13
t MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Mey Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria N.
Operability
- 1) All reviewed
- 1) All OD items are
- 1) Reviewlog versus known 100 %
Determination identified / reported items from files, interviews, etc.
Completed June 7,1996 (Essential Element II.C.1)
Responsibility: Burton (Oversite l
Responsibility:
Manager OBV)
- 2) Any degraded condition (s)
- 1) OD items are assessed
- 1) Document reviews for Sample evaluated for acceptability for operability /
thoroughness /
[
reportability.
completeness reasonableness of arguments and interviews.
- 2) OD'sinclude operator
- 2) Documentreviewsand burden evaluation and interviews Sample causal factors.. Extent of issues, generic Sample implications are identified
- 3) OD's are timely,
- 3) Document review and j
reasonable and interviews adequate.
(Essential Element ll.C.1) l l
O.
Maintenance The process of determining Interviewof appropriate interview a sample of Rule A(1) which systems are A(1)is engineering personnelwho appropriate engineering adequate, systems make this determination.
personnelwho make this Completed July 1,1996 designated A(1) are determination.
Responsibility: Enoch appropriately identified and l
(Oversite documented. (Essential l
Responsibility:
elements I.F.1 and 2 and Manager PQS)
II.C.1) t 6/10/96 9:31 AM 14
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria O.
Maintenance
- 1) Allactions plans Action plans are adequate, Documentation review of action Sampleof actionplans Rule A(1) Cont.
complete / reviewed and completed, reviewed and plans to verify adequacy, related to safety significant accepted approved. (Essential completion, review and systems / areas. (example -
element II.C.1) approval.
reactivity control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant indications / hardware
- 2) Internal assessment Internalassessment Review assessment comments 100 %
comments comments have been and their dispositions.
appropriately addressed and documented. (Essential element II.C.1) i P.
ISTs The ISTidentification Interview Operations and Interview a sample of process is adequate. ISTs Engineering personnel.
operations and Completed June 28, are appropriately identified Review completed ISTs for engineering department 1996 performed and documented.
adequacy of performance and personnel associated with review maintenance activities ISTs.
Responsibility: Gerber (Oversite that potential!y could resultin Review a sample of Responsibility:
the requirement to perform an completed ISTs and IST.
maintenance activities on Manager PQS) safety significant systems / areas. (example -
reactivity control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant indications / hardware).
- 1) open (to close during s/u)
ISTs closed except those Review open IST list.
Review open IST list to i
that must be performed verify they must be done i
during the start-up process.
during start-up.
I 6/10/96 9:31 AM 15
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section Ill: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Mey Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria Q.
JCOs
- 1) All reviewed and scheduled
- 1) JCOs are Document reviews list versus 100 %
for resolution identified / reported.
log and interviews.
Completed June 7,1996 Responsibility: Burton (Essential Element II.C.1)
(Oversite Responsibility:
Manager OBV)
- 1) JCOs for operator Document reviews and Sample burdens have little or no interviews.
operability impact.
(Essential Element li.C.1)
- 1) The action plan for JCO Document reviews and Sample resolutionis accurate, interviews and reasonable in terms of Justification, length of time active.
l (Essential Element II.C.1)
- 1) Resolution addresses Document reviews and Sample the extent of condition interviews and genericimplications l
6/10/96 9:31 AM 16
l l
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section ill: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria l
R.
Manual Action in 1.
The process for 1.
Interview Operations and Sample of Operations and lieu of determination of Systern Engineering System Engineering automatic actions situations that require personnelto determine if personnel.
transfer of automatic there are similar situations Completed June 12, action to manual action that should be addressed.
1996 is reasonable and clear.
Responsibility: McDaniel Similar situations are (Oversite appropriately identified, Responsibility:
prioritized, Manager PQS) disposition / closed and documented.
Communicate to the appropriate personnel / organizations.
2.
The knowledge of the 2.
Interview DO to determine Dedicated Operator of the levelof knowledge of their duties and the Dedicated Operator of responsibilities is their duties and
- adequate, responsibilities.
- 1) Initiate PTSCR for The PTSCR for 3RHS*V43 Document review of Tech Spec.
100 %.
3RHS*V43 is submitted in accordance change submittal.
with Tech. Spec. change process.
- 2) Develop action plan for The action plan for Evaluate corrective action plan 100 %
3HVR*FN6NB 3HVR*FN6NB is developed adequately addresses the and adequately addresses issues in the initiating issues identified.
document.
6/10/96 9:31 AM 17
l i
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. 0 Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start up Criteria NSO Mey Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review j
Criteria S.
QSD Open items
- 1) Reviewed and resolved as The QAS Open items Documentation review of Audit, Review all QAS Audit, l
(includes CUAT) required (including CUAT(JUMA) and Surveillance,ISEG and CUAT Surveillance,ISEG and -
ISEG ltems) identification reports to identify open items.
CUAT reports forlast two Completed June 21, processis reasonable and years.
1996 clear. Open items are Responsibility: Sullivan appropriately identified, (Oversite resolved, tracked and Responsibility:
documented.
Manager PQS)
T.
NSAB Open
- 2) Dispositioned The NSAB and NRB Open Documentation review of Review NSAB/NRB Open items items (including NSAB Sub-NSABINRB Open items items (Including NSAB committee) identification (including NSAB Sub-Sub-committee) reports for Completed June 21, processis reasonable and committee) reports to identify last two years 1996 clear. Open items are open items.
Responsibility: Brothers appropriately identified, (Oversite tracked resolved, and Responsibility:
documented.
l Manager PQS)
U.
Hardware
- 1) RSS/QSS Identified plant modifications, Review Design Control Perform field walkdowns of Modifications 2)
"C" MSIV under this start-up criteria modification packages for appropriate sample of
- 3) Generator Rewedge are installed in accordance completeness and closure.
system modifications.
- 4) RHR PLTB with the Design Control Perform field verification of
- 5) CRDM Cooling Fan Process and cicsed in installation of modifications.
s
- 6) Service Water accordance with I
- 7) FWS Overpressurization programmatic requirements.
- 8) MSS *MOV18A-D See item lil-G for design i
Responsibility: Langan
- 9) Condenser Steam Dumps control process verification.
(Oversite
- 10) Screenwash Work Responsibility:
- 11) AOV Airlines Manager PQSIOBV)
- 12) Replace Battery 6 6/10/96 9:31 AM 18
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria V.
Material The Units material condition 1.
Discuss with Unit Discuss with a sample of Condition determination process is personnel.
Unit personnel.
]
reasonable and clear.
2.
Participate in management Participatein a sample of Deficient plant material material condition Unit walkdowns.
conditions are appropriately walkdowns.
Attend a sample of identified, prioritized,
- 3. Attend meetings where meetings.
Responsibility: Roy dispositioned/ closed, tracked materialconditions are (Oversite and documented.
discussed and/or Responsibility:
Communicated to dispositioned/ closed to Manager PQS) appropriate personnel and determine the adequacy of organizations.
the prioritization and disposition / closure.
Essential Element II.C.1 4.
Participate in preliminary and final system walkdowns (PI-4 and PI-5).
- 1) Complete refurbishment of Refurbishments of the Determine app!! cable design Identified areas.
l Intake Screen general area identified areas meets requirements and management
- 2) Complete refurbishment of design documents and expectations. Verify by ESF management expectations.
walkdowns ofidentified areas
- 3) Complete painting of the East / West Switchgear enclosures W.
Level 'A' and 'B'
- 1) Reviewed
- 1) Level A and 8 ACRs, Documentation review of Level 100% of Level A and 8 ACRs have effective root A and B ACR packages.
ACRs cause determinations Completed May 24, and corrective actions 1996 have been identified, Responsibility: Burton prioritized, assigned and (Oversite implemented, based on Responsibility:
the issues.
Manager PQS) 1 6/10/96 9:31 AM 19
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O r
l Section Ill: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Crlieria W.
Level 'A' and *B'
- 2) Assess the adequacy of Documentation review of Level Sample of Level C and D ACRs Cont.
the review of LevelC C and D ACR packages.
ACRs Review the open -
and D ACRs. To ACRs for the past two l
determine that they have years to identify ACRs a completelist of Level required to be completed C and D ACRs, effective prior to start-up/after start-l causal factor up for a sample of safety j
determinations (as significant systems / areas l
applicable) and (example -reactivity corrective actions have control, inventory control, been identified, barrier effects, post prioritized, assigned and accident monitoring, implemented, based on emergency power and the issues.
secondary plant (Essential Element ll.C.1) indications / hardware.).
3.
Assess the trend of Documentation review of the Review thelast years closure / timeliness /
trend of ACR ACRs for adverse trends in responsible closure / timeliness / responsible ACR closure / timeliness /
organization.
organization for adverse trends.
responsible organization.
X.
MT. Items
- 1) Reviewed and incorporated Open items within MTF have Review data systems to verify Review a sample of into AITTS been transferred in totalto that open MTF items have been AITTS/MTF.(include in this Completed June 28, AITTS.
totally incorporated into AITTS.
sample items from sections 111-A thru Z as 1996 Responsibility: Gerber appropriate.
(Oversite Responsibility:
l Manager PQS) 6/10/96 9:31 AM 20
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section lil: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation NOS Extent Of Review Criteria Y.
Normal Startup
- 1) No scheduling in " grace" The mode punchlists, and Discuss with Operations, A sample of Operations, items for any surveillance's for emergent operability issues Engineering and management Engineering and the remainder of the cycle are complete and clear.
personnel.
management personnel.
- 2) Emergent Operability (Adequacy of surveillance Attend meetings where mode Attend a sample of scheduling and scheduling punchilst items and emergent meetings where mode process is addressed under operability issues are identified.
punchlistitems and Responsibility: Langan Section ill-M).
(e.g., morning management emergent operability (Oversite Communicate to the meetings and outage planning issues are identified. (e.g.,
Responsibility:
appropriate personnel and meetings).
moming management Manager PQS) organizations.
meetings, outage planning meetings, etc.).
(Essential E!ement Section i
ll.C.1)
- 3) Allapplicable mode 1.
Punchlist items are 1.
Review punchlist closure Sample Qunchlist punchlists complete adequately closed and documents.
closure and survelliance approved by appropriate documents.
levels of management.
[
2.
Applicable surveillances 2.
Review surveillances are completed and required for mode change systems are operable.
are performed and systems are operable.
r (Essential Element Section li.C.1) l 6/10/96 9:31 AM 21
i MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN Rev. O Section Ill: Plant Hardware - Critical Backlogs Activity Unit Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation NOS Method for Evaluation WOS Extent Of Review Criteria Z.
NRC Information
- 1) Reviewed for applicability The adequacy of the Review of appropriate NRC 100% of past two years of (Ins, Gts etc) process used toidentify, documents to identify UnfI NRC documents.(NRC track, evaluate, address and applicability and required inspection reports are Completed June 21, document required actionr, actions.
covered under Section ill-1996 contained in NRC J).
Responsibility:
Information (IN's, GL'r, etc.)
TempleNenable is reasonable and dear.
(Oversite Required actions, Responsibility:
assignmentof terponsibility Manager PQS) for completion, t'acking and documentation are clear.
Communicated to the appropriate personnel and organizations.
- 2) All addressed /no operability Process to ensure there are Review of appropriate NRC 100% of past two years of questions no operability questionsis documents for past two years to NRC documents.(NRC reasonable.
identify Unit applicability and no inspection reports are operability questions.
covered under Section lil-J).
6/10/96 9:31 AM 22
REVO June 10,1996 SECTION IV NSO STARTUP ASSESSMENT TEAM r
i This section defines the NSO MP3 Startup l
I Assessment Team Objective, Scope, Methodology, I
and Success Criteria to be employed in assessing the i
readiness of MP3 for restart Responsibility: M.B. Browri l
1 I
i i
~
NSO MP3 STARTUP OVERSIGHT PLAN SECTION IV: STARTUP ASSESSMENT TEAM Section IV:
Startup Assessment Team l
Objective j
To ensure Millstone Unit 3 is prepared for a safe startup and a reliable cycle of operation.
Scone An oversight Startup Assessment Team (SAT) is to perform an in-depth assessment of the Millstone Unit 3 readiness for plant startup. The scope of the assessment is to include:
Management and Organization; Operations and Training; Maintenan'ce and Work Control; J
Engineering and Technical Support Corrective Action Effectiveness and Self-Assessment Programs.
Actions that the SAT believes are necessary to complete before restart are to be specifically identified in the final SAT report.
Methodology The SAT review will be modeled after the Unit 2 startup assessment conducted during 1995.
The SAT is expected to perform its assessment by means of:
Direct observation of operating crews, maintenance and l&C personnel and other personnel in support of Unit 3; interviews of key individuals; and e
Review of relevant documents (e.g. NRC Inspection Reports, INPO Report, ACRs, QAS e
Reports, SALP Reports, MOP Data and NSAB Reports)
Oversight Resoonsibility Executive Director Nuclear Safety and Oversight, Millstone Station.
Success Criteria Team is composed of: (a) experienced and well qualified individuals; (b) sufficient numbers, duration and expertise to assure an in-depth review and (c) members not directly involved in nor responsible for Millstone 3 operations or support.
Review period is scheduled close to the anticipated startup date (following completion of sufficient work activities to allow an accurate perspective on restart activities). Review activities are completed in parallel with other activities so as not to become critical path.
The team charter is consistent with the scope and methodology as outlined above and its j
implementation will provide high confidence that the stated goal will be achieved.
No issues are identified that are considered restart issues or issues affecting plant safety, j
or if such issues are identified they are resolved prior to restart.
Current policies, programs, processes and procedures are judged to be adequate and their implementation effective. Significant deficiencies are corrected prior to startup.
Rev.O June 10,1996 Page 1
)
RW O June 10,1996 SECTION V f
F NSO ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MP'3 PLANT STARTUP ASSESSMENT This section defines the NSO Plan to assess the MP3 plant start-up/ routine activities Responsibility: As defined in document.
O
I MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN - Rev. O Section V: Normal Outage and Start-Up Oversight Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for Evaluation NSO Extent Of Review A)
Conduct of
- 1. Operation Shift Performance.
The shif t turnover process is Obs.erve shift performance to Observations on Operations
- 2. Plant Start Up/ Mode Changes adequate. Control Room determine the adequacy and each of the operating Decorum including team work, completeness of shift turnover.
shifts.
(R:sponsible: Manager -
communication, conservative Control Room Decorum POS) decision making, etc. is including shutdown risk reasonable and consistent with management, team work, procedures.
communication, conservative decision making, etc., and assess operator actions during these evolutions.
Independently verify adequacy and correctness of valve line ups and system tag outs, and completion of mode change checklist (s) (See section Ill.Y.3).
- 3. Configuration Management
- 3. Tagging control and system (Tagging Control and system line ups are performed in line-ups) accordance with the program requirements.
- 4. Shutdown Risk Management.
4.
Shutdown Risk as app!icable is assessed and managed in accordance with approved procedures.
8/10/96 9:32 AM i
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN - Rev. O Section V: Normal Outage and Start-Up Oversight Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for Evaluation NSO Extent Of Review B)
Plant Testing
- 1. Observe performance of:
- The performance of the test is Observe testing and review Observed and review Surveillance Testing in accordance with approved testing documentation..
documentation'of a Activities Low Power Physics procedures.
sample of testing Test requirements are performed on safety (R:sponsible: Manager -
Testing
- IPTEs identified.
significant POS)
Evaluation of test results is systems / areas e LLRTs ISTs (See Section til adequate.
(example - reactivity Documentation of test is control, inventory (P))
Post Maintenance and appropriate.
control, barrier Modification Testing ef fects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant indications /
hardware.)
C)
Temporary This area is addressed under Modifications Sections 111 (A) and 111 (G).
(B/J's) and Permanent Modifications.
(R:sponsible: Manager -
POS)
Alin/QA 9 37 AM 2
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN - Rev. O Section V: Normal Outage and Start-Up Oversight Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for Evaluation NSO Extent Of Review D)
Operator
- 1. General Operator Qualification
- 1. The current qualification
- 1. Review Training Lesson
- 1. Sample of Training Training.
training of the operating
' Plans to assess current changes (made crews include applicable quellfication training of the to FSAR, Tech.
(Rssponsible: Manager -
changes (FSAR, Tech. Spec.,
operating crews include Spec., TRM, TRM, Operations Procedures, applicable changes (FSAR, Operations i
POSI etc.).
Tech. Spec., TRM, Procedures, etc.)
- 2. Training resulting from system
- 2. Evaluation as defined in Operations Procedures, on safety modifications.
Section Ill (G) of NSO etc.).
significant Assessment Plan.
systems / areas (example -
reactivity control, inventory control, barrier effects, post accident monitoring, emergency power and secondary plant Indications /
hardware.).
6/10/96 9:32 AM 3
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN - Rev. 0 l
Section V: Normal Outage and Start-Up Oversight Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for Evaluation NSO Extent Of Review El Field Work
- 1. Work Package Adoquacy
- 1. Assess work packages to
- 1., Review inprocess work
- 1. Appropriate Performance determine that adequate packages to determine that sample of direction and control to adequate direction and inprocess OA (R sponsible: Manager -
perform the work is provided.
control to perform the work work packages.
is provided POS) t
- 2. Field Work Practices
- 2. Assess the adequacy of field
- 2. Work observations and
- 2. Appropriate work practices including:
personnel interviews to sample of f
STAR Practices assess the adequacy of field inprocess QA f
= Material Control work practices including:
work activities.
STAR Practices
- Pre and Post Job e
Industrial Safety Briefs Pro and Post Job Worker Qualification Supervisory Briefs e
involvement
- Worker Outilfication Supervisory Physical Work Practices.
Involvement Physical Work Practices.
F)
Work Planning This area is addressed under Sections I.C.3 and lit (F).
(Rssponsibility as dsfined in referenced ovsrsight plan sections)
Alin!QR R32 AM 4
MP3 START-UP OVERSIGHT PLAN - Rev. O Section V: Normal Outage and Start-Up Oversight Activity Start-up Criteria NSO Key Evaluation Criteria NSO Method for Evaluation NSO Extent Of Review G)
Vendor Control
- 1. Vendor personnel are
- 1. Vendor personnel are 1.
Document review and Sample of vendor adequately tralned in Millstone adequately tralned in Millstone personnel review of vendor activities associated (R:sponsible: Manager -
Station policles and Station policies and personnel and their with safety POS) procedures.
procedures.
respective records.
significant systems
- 2. Vendor are appropriately
- 2. Responsible NU personnel are
- 2. Document review and and areas. (example -
controlled by Millstone adequately trained in their personnel review of NU reactivity control, personnel.
responsibilities regarding personnel and their inventory control, control of vendor personnel respective records.
barrier effects, post including certification review accident monitoring, and acceptance.
emergency power and secondary plant Indications /
hardware.).
H)
Engineering and
- 1. Design Changes and
- 1. This area is addressed under Technical Modifications.
Section 111 (G).
Support
- 2. Bypass Jumpers
- 2. This area is addressed under Section lit (A).
(R sponsibility as
- 3. NCRs
- 3. This area is addressed under dsfined in referenced Section 111 (B).
oversight plan sections)
- 4. Abnormal Plant Conditions
- 4. This area is addressed under Section 111 (E).
- 5. MEPL Evaluations
- 5. This area is addressed under Section I!! (L).
- 6. Self Assessments
- 6. This area is addressed under Section I (G).
- 7. Management Communications
- 7. This area is addressed under Sections I (A/B).
- 8. System Readiness
- 8. This area is addressed under Section ll.C.1.
6/10/96 9:32 AM 5
f E
I a'
l O
Y T
knerer_nai veNationalPres 3
627
=
1 W
l Monday, June 24,1996 ED Volume 24, Number 120 AltusMergerReinvigorates DOE Sees Merit State-FederalDebate In Joanston Proposa.
BY MARY O'ORISCOLL On Class Action Suits The state-federal regulatory debate has resumed, this time in context of the Ahus merger: The Washing-ton Utilitics and Transportation Commission staff said BY GEORGE LOBSENZ last week it will reopen and recommend rejection of the deal if the company is forced to impicment sing!c-system rates.
Sen. Dennett Johnston (D-La.) ran into a roadblock According to hearing testimony filed earlier this last week in his effort to move legislation to limit month by Alan Buckley on behalf of the Washington lawsuits against the Energy Department's nuclea r w eap-UTC, the state regulators could not have made their ons pla nt contractors. llo w ever, DOE officials expressed new interest in his idea, and have begun circulating position on the merger more clear: Pricing between their own proposals-Altus' Washington and Nevada divisions must be market based, transmission pricing must be done on a Under Secretary Thomas Grumbly told reporters divisional basis and wholesale requirements rates must Wednesday the Clinton administration did not have an be assigned to their respective divisions. Those points official position on Johnston's bill, but that DOE is were a key factor in WUTC's decision to approve the interested in pursuing the issue.
merger, he said.
"We don't have an administration position on it
[Johnston's bill) at the moment," Grumbly said. "But we However. this conflicts with the Federal Energy think it is a problem that has to be grappled with.
Regulatory Commission's initial decision in the "We have some other merger last November, NU: Millstone Review Finds 881 ideas that we may want to uhen it set for hearing Deficiencies, But No Problems throw in the mix as well,,he added. "We wiii be trying to AItus' plan to keep its divmons operating sepa-Northeast Utilities handed over a $76-page document P'.rsuade our colleagues that rately-and pointedly to tbc Nuclear Regulatory Commission last week outlin-this is an issue that we need questioned why % ashing-ing the company's plans for addressing hundreds of I do somethmg about,
ton Water Power and design deficiencies identified so far at the company's hile Grumbly declined Millstone 3 reactor.
I provide specifics on Sierra Pacific Power were i
]
planning to merge if they Company officials insist that none of the deficien-DOE s " ideas,, sources told were not also planning i cies-881 have been identified so far-are safety sig-The Energy Daily that DOE combine their operations.
nificant. According to NU spokeswoman Debbie fricials are floating a plan FERC trial staff has taken Beauchamp, the problems range in severity, from failure under which the department a somlar position during to update the plant's final safety analysis report (FSAR) w uld repla,ce contractors as m reflect design changes "to an aren [of the plant]
defendants in nuclear weap-the hearing.
But, Buckley said in needing a fresh coat of paint."
ons plant lawsuits. Cur-testimony filed in the case Beauchamp added that most of the problems boil rently, lawsuits over DOE
{
June 12, if FERC takes down to poor paperwork, particularly in relation to the plant operations are filed l
actions that violate the plant's FSAR-a critical document that forms the basis against the contractors that Washington stipulation' for all licensing decisions. For instance, certain aspects operate the plants, but the the Washington commis-of Millstone 3's operations were found to be out of synch department pays for their sioners "are prepared to act with its FSAR, but Beauchamp said this reDects nothing defense due to indemnifica-more than management's failure to incorporate updated tion provided contractors drawings and calculations into the report, not any opera-eo en the ca e t
e tc j
WUTC staff "would also ti (a pm iab I ty law.
move to reopen the N
e ds to do, said Beauchamp,is to look at Making DO dant would brm,E the defen-proceedings with the lhe process by which changes are made to the physical g into play recommendation that the plant,"and how that translates back into the plant design the Federal Tort Claims Act, i
P3P which prohibits class action l
l (Continued on page 2)
AM MMN (Continued on page 2)
A'ITENTION: COPYRIGIITED M ATERIAL It is unlawful to photocopy this page without written permission from the l
[W7 I