ML20114C169
| ML20114C169 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1992 |
| From: | SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20114C165 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9209020027 | |
| Download: ML20114C169 (4) | |
Text
.
TABLE 1 RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.1.11 of the Joseph M. Farley Unit 1 Technical Specifications.
The Fxy limits for RATED TilERMAL POWER within specified core planes for Cycle 12 shall be:
For VANTAGE 5 fuel:
1.
F R" less than or equal to 2.40 for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods.
y 2.
For all unrodded core planes:
F R" less than or equal to 1.92 up to core elevations of 7.3 ft.
y F R" less than or equal to 1.88 for core elevations above 7.3 ft.
y For low-Parasitic (LOPAR) fuel:
1.
F R" less than or equal to 2.30 for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods.
y 2.
For all unrodded core planes:
F R" less than or equal to 1.82 up to core elevation of 7.3 ft.
y F Rn less than or equal to 1.78 for core elevations above 7.3 ft.
y 9209020027 920824 PDR ADOCK 03000348 P
PDR Rev. 07/10.9210 00nm A-1
3 6
TABLE i (cont.)
RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT These Fxy(z) limits are used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor Fq(z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:
VANTAGE 5 fuel:
Fq(z) s
[(2.45)K(z))) for P > 0.5 and, P
Fq(z) $
4.90 [(K(z))] for P s 0.5 tow-Parasitic (LOPAR) fuel:
Fq(z) $
[(2{2)(K(z))) for P > 0.5 and,
-P
' Fq(z) s 4.64 [(K(z))) for P s 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of Control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the " Power Distribution Control and Imad Following Pmcedures," WCAP 8385, September,1974. Therefore, these Fxy limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met and the ECCS acceptance criterion limit of 2200 *F for peak clad temperature is not exceeded, l
Rev. 07n ON210-00am A-2 j:
l i
FIGURE 1 9
VANTAGE 5 MAXIMUM (FOT x Prel) VERSUS CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 2.5.p _4__
_g__
_a _...._y_ __._.
+
+
Dwd 2.4 l
- +
gg
,__q_
j ___j_.%g_.
n__-
2.3
+
i
+
4 i
+
i r,
2
- 4 4 T
2.2 T
i
+
_p_._
+
_y_.
2.1
~
i i
+
i i
9
- +
i i
4
.1
}
i i
i 2.0
_ i,
_-+
i
. _. i.
_,1-e i
+
M W
1 cr1.9 Q.
+
1 i
i i
M 5
}
T-1.8 i
r 4
o u_
i
- s 1.7 i
s 4
l l
+
l x 1.6 i,
E i
i 1
i i
1.5 l
i p-i i
-+--
i i
i 1.4 i
i i
i
-t-I
+-
1.2 CORE HEIGHT FXY LIMIT BELOW 7.3 FT.
1.92
~
H i
ABOVE 7.3 FT.
1.88 1.1 i
j l
' rh, i i
1.0 ii i
i 0
2 4
6 10 12 CORE HEIGHT (FEET) 8 l
l A-3
y FIGURE 2 LOPAR MAXIMUM (FOT x Prel) VERSUS CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 2.5 +
-- l -
j!
__A_
+
_+.__q__
-t i
i i
i 2.4 i
_.4.-___.y_
_Q_._
.i 2.3 I
+
l 3 jpg 4
1 1
r-q+
-w%,
+ t r
i 9tN e
2.2 q
i 1;
+
_I t__._.g __q__f.
j+
_ 4 i
.trv 1
2.1 I
i i+
i i
T 2.0 l
i i
+
i i
_a i
i I
LLj i
i O#.*
i 1
Ai o.
-+
I i
i i
l 4-4--
l x
1.8
- o i
Lt.
i s 1.7 a
2 i
~
i j
i i
41.6 i
a i
l 3
i j
i
{
e 1.5 l
l
~
r
+
T i
i i
1.4 l
l i
i i
i 1
i i
i
~T i
i i
j i
1.3 e
i
>i 1.2 CORE HEIGHT FXY LIMIT BELOW 7.3 FT.
1.82 i
i AB0VE 7.3 FT.
1.78 1.1 i
i 4
i i
1*0 O 2
4 6
8 10 12 COREHEIGHT(FEET)
A-4
-