ML20114B759
| ML20114B759 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1992 |
| From: | Woodard J SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9208310202 | |
| Download: ML20114B759 (4) | |
Text
...
4 1
St.w;twn Noctear Operats o Cmpany Post Offce Sc. 1295 Damn;pam. Atibama 3520t TesepNne 205 868-5066 L
Southern Nudear Operating Comnany
,,, o. m vce mesant m e :, g.,een e;ecy c g p;ern rasej re:ect Auc.vist 24, 1992 10 CFR 26.71 Docket Nos.
50-348 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Petformaqqg_ Data Gentlemen:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six month reporting period, January 1992 through June 1992, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). This data is summarized on the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, Nd>
pd s _Is N
. Woodard JDW/JMG Enclosures cc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. S. T. Hoffman Mr. G. F. Maxwell oFI I
- \\
310093 9200310202 920324 PDR ADOCK 05000348 R
9 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Southern Nuclear Operating Company 06/30/92 Comt,a7 8 WD'es Enong Joseph M. Farley Nuclear: Plant and Corporate Headouarters Lomeon J. A. Ripple (205) 868-5075 cone. 8,,
w m e..
o.>
Cutot!s: ScreervConfirmaton (ng'ml)
Ul Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana
/
Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
- /
I Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number wat Unescorted Access 1488 24 -
384 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre Access 97 0
78 0
-1330 11 Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 Observea behavior 8
0 0
0 7
4 Random 772 2
48 0
177 0
Follow up 21-0 0
0 8
-1
'letest/
~Other Return to Work 4
0 0
0 0
0 al
-902 2-126 n
1522 16 REv.1/92
ll 11 iI 9
A 1
=
5 2
9
/6 4
0 2
9
/
1 0
3 C
NS 2
1
!ats s e u
f T 0
0 0
0 e o Rt lo s
h e
oc 0
0 6
6 c
lA na t
s ye b
c n n i 0
0 0
0 u
eid S
hl c P
c if i
s c
o e h n e
pi 0
0 0
0 p
mm S
A *;
i r
o s
f e
s tc 0
0 0
0 t
ip se O
Te e
v n
i ia t
c 0
0 5
5 i
o s
C oP an d
au e
ir 2
0
'6 8
j m
a r
M ifn s
s o
r r
s o
o C
t t
e c
c f
e a
a r
y r
o b
n n
t t
n p
o o
w m
C C
o m
m E
r e
r d
e e
e k
s T-T-
n g
t l
a r
e n
o a
e ic o
h o
t r
L L
S T
B r
\\1llll ll li
A J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Program h.: data generated under the Fitness For Duty program from January 1992 through June 1992 has been reviewed and analyzed. The data reflected in this report is that of employees of the J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant and employees of Southern Nuclear Operating Company Corporate Headquarters.
The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but also those emplovees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. Contractors without-approved programs are included in the pool while on site. Testing is performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends-and holidays at a rate which will equal 100% yearly of the total populatior..-
In summarizing management actions associated with the Fitness For Duty program, it should be emphasized that the incidence of_ confirmed positive tests for the licensee has been low. Consequently, management-actions 3
relative to determination of fitness for duty have been limited to two individuals. Contractor em)loyees screened as positive are denied access and no-further action is ta(en.
x Management actions during this reporting period ' involved two individuals.
The first individual tested positive for the second time under the Fitness Far Duty rule and was thereby terminated from employment. The second individual had accass suspended following a confirmed positive. He was removed from duty and was referred to the Employee Assistance Program.
After full evaluation and rehabilitation, the employee had access restored, was returned to full duties and was entered in the follow-up testing pool.
Effective June 1,1992 the Fitness For Duty -substance panel for urine-was changed to screen exclusively for the NIDA 5. panel _ as outlined in 10 CFR Part 26.
Barbiturates and-benzodiazepines were dropped from the screening and confirmation process. Southern Nuclear had previously informed' the NRC of this change by lettar dated May 6, 1992.
I i
h