ML20113C909

Forwards Results of USI A-46 Evaluation for Plant & Confirms That No Significant or Programmatic Deviations from GIP Guidance Made During USI A-46 Resolution Process

ML20113C909
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	06/28/1996
From:	Draft E COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20113C911	List: ML20113C909 ML20113C913 ML20113C922
References
REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR ESK-96-128, NUDOCS 9607020185
Download: ML20113C909 (2)

Text

Cornnlos, .th I:divin Company Quad Citich Gent rating Station 22710 2(bth Asenue North Cordova. 11.61212-9710 Tel 30%51-22 6 I ESK-96-128 June 28,1996 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Units 1 & 2 Summary Report for Resolution of Unresolved Safety issue (USI) A-46 Generic Letter 87-02 NRC Docket.lt 50-254 and 50-265 This letter forwards the results of the USI A-46 evaluation for the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2. This letter also confirms that no significant or programmatic deviations from the Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) guidance were made during the USI A-46 resolution process.

USI A-46 REPORTS Section I.2.2.8 of GIP-2 requires that a plant-specific Summary Repon be submitted to the NRC Staff, including a proposed schedule for future modifications and replacements of those outliers which are yet to be resolved. Further, GIP-2 Section II.9 provides for Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL), Relay Evaluation, Seismic Evaluation and Completion Repons. This letter constitutes the Summary Report. Attachment 1 includes the Seismic Evaluation Report and Attachment 2 includes the Relay Evaluation Report.

As permitted in GIP-2 Section II.9.2, the pertinent results from the SSEL are included in the attached Seismic Evaluation and the Relay Evaluation Reports. To permit both the Seismic and Relay Evaluation Reports to be reviewed independently, there are a few areas of redundancy between these repons, e.g. a description of Safe Shutdown Equipment is included in both reports. The Completion Report will be submitted when all the planned actions for resolution of USI A-46 have been completed (Following Q2R16).

OUTLIERS Outliers, which are not deficiencies against the plant's licensing or design basis, as defined by GIP-2, were identified during the seismic and relay reviews. These outliers are 0200N described in detail in the attached reports. (

The schedule for resolution, future modifications and replacements of those outliers, which have not yet been resolved, is provided in the attached reports. Comed will resolve i all of the outliers for each respective Unit by the end of the second refueling outage for that Unit after the receipt of the Safety Evaluata.n Report. \\

9607020185 960628 PDR ADOCK 05000254 P PDR

ESK-96-128 June 28,1996 USNRC To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contained in this document is true and correct. Such information has been reviewed in accordance with site practics and I believe it to be reliable.

Ifyou have any questions, please contact Nick Chrissotimos, Quad Cities Regulatory Assurance at (309)654-2241, extension 3100.

Sincerely, E. S. Kraft, Site Vice President Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Attachments:

(1) A-46 Seismic Evaluation Report for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2 (2) A-46 Relay Evaluation Report for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2 cc: H. J. Miller, Region III Administrator R. M. Pulsifer, Project Manager, NRR C, Miller, Senior Resident Inspector, Quad Cities Office of Nuclear Facility Safety - IDNS R. J. Singer, MidAmerican Energy Company D. C. Tubbs, MidAmerican Energy Company P. Piet, Licensing, Comed

" OFFICIAL SEAL" ,

LNdDA LEE STOERMER

, NotaryPutsc,Stateatevos MyCommenen Esses 11/1W96  ;

Subscribed and Sworn to before me on this

1. day ofic ,1996.

w/n ec. n.eJ Notary Public l