ML20113B737

Rev 1 to Program Plan for Hope Creek Independent Design Verification Program

ML20113B737
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/05/1985
From:	SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20100J857	List: ML20100J853 ML20113B737
References
PROC-850405, NUDOCS 8504110370
Download: ML20113B737 (200)

Text

SARGENTS LUNDY m

U O

PROGRAM PLAN FOR HOPE CREEK INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY I

i

!O 850404 Controlled Copy No. 24 +

BSO411gG A OSC00354 PDR PDR

! A

Program Plan for Hope Creek i SARGENT S LUNDY REVISION 1 Independent Design Verification Program p

v 4/5/85 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction I-1 II. Compliance with Frogram Requirements 11- 1 A. Objective 11- 1 B. Independence 11- 1 C. Design Review Experience 11- 1 D. Review Team II-l E. Interfacing 11- 2 F. Use of Data II-3 G. Work Output II-3 III. Scope and Approach to Work 111- 1 A. Tasks III-l t

1. Finalize Program Plan and

, Report Outline III-l

'O V

2. Prepare Project Manual

3. IDVP Kickoff Meeting 111- 1 Ill-1

4. Assemble Design Requirements, Design Control and Interface Documents, and Design Documents III-2

5. Sptem 4 alkdown III-2

6. Electrical Design Review III-3

7. Instrumentation and Controls Design l Review III-3 III-3

8. Mechanical Design Review

9. Structural Design Review Ill-3

10. Environmental Qualification and 1 Pipe Break Analysis Review III-3

11. Design Control Process Review III-3

12. Review of Observations III-9

13. Prepare and L cue Final Report III-9

14. Project Adr.mustration 111- 1 0 IV. Project Schedule and Controls IV-1 A. Project Schedule IV-1 B. Project Controls and Reporting IV-1 V. Organization V-1 A. Project Team V-1 B. Internal Review Committee V-3 v)

SARGENT E LUNDY ii REVISION 1 4/3/85 Page VI. Qualifications and Experience VI-l A. Direct and Related VI-l B. Nuclear Design Experience VI-l VII. Protocol VII-1 VIII. Resumes VIII-l A. Project Team Vill-1 B. Internal Review Committee VIII-2 C. Senior Review Committee VIII-3 APPENDIX A. Quality Assurance Program Plan B. Forms and Sample Checklists

. C. Glossary D. System Selection Criteria l

O r

SARGENT& LUNDY Exhibits lii REVISION 1 o 4/5/85 CJ III-I Precedence Diagram III-2 Sequence of Design Review Activities Ill-3 Processing of Observations III-4 Prepared Project Documents 111-3 Project Design Requirements III-6 Documents Required for Design Control and Interface Adequacy Review III-7 Required Design Documents III-8 Preliminary Final Report Outline

~

V-1 Sargent & Lundy Hope Creek IDVP Organization V-2 Hope Creek Team Personnel VI-l Operating BWRs Sargent & Lundy is Cur ently Servicing VI-2 Experience Complying with Audits anc' Design Reviews ,

VI-3 Nucleat Units Authorized for Design by O

Sargent & Lundy 1

V

SARGENT & LUNDY I. Introduction 1-1 m REVISION 1

( ) 4/5/85 -

v This program plan for the Hope Creek Generating Station (Hope Cree <) Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) decribes the scope and approach to work; the schedule for carrying out the work and the project controls Sargent & Lundy (S&L) will employ to manage the project; the project team, Internal Review Committee and Senior Review Committee, and S&L's qualifications and experience.

The Program Plan is described in Chapters 11 through Vill. - -

Chapter II, Compliance with Program Requirements, discusses how S&L will meet the requirements outlined in section 11 of the Hope Creek Generating Station Independent Design Review Work Scope Document (Work Scope Document) transmitted by Mr. J. P. Boyle's (PSE&G) letter of November 14, 1984, to Mr. L. E. Ackmann of S&L, subsequent meetings with PSE&G on February 11 and

/ February 12,1985, and agreements between PSE&G and the O; Public Advocate of New Jersey.

Chapter !!!, Scope and Approach to Work, discusses how S&L will carry out the design review. It also includes a precedence diagram of the key events leading to issuance of the final report.

Chapter IV, Project Schedule and Controls, includes a discussion of the project schedule, the precedence network diagram, and S&L's approach to monitoring progress on this project.

Chapter V, Organization, contains a description of S&L's company organization, project team approach, identi-fication of key personnel, and the strengths the project team will bring to this review.

In Chapter VI, Qualifications and Experience, S&L presents our experience on similar recent projects.

Chapter VII, Protocol and Forms, includes the communication protocol to be used on the project.

n

( )

%/

200,036

i j SARGENT A LUNDY I-2

' REVISION 1

' 4/5/85 1

1 Chapter Vill, Resumes, includes the resumes of the l1

project team members and the Senior Review Committee members.

l l

l'O f

I \

O

SARGENTS LUNDY IL Compliance with Program Requirements 11- 1 REVISION 1 4/3/85

(] -

G A. Objective The Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) is a design review to provide additional assurance that the design of the Hope Creek Power Station meets licensing requirements, through a review of the technical adequacy of selected systems and the design process, including both vertical and horizontal-type reviews.

B. Independence Prior to this IDVP assignment, Sargent & Lundy has never had any contractual relationship with PSE&G, Bechtel, or GE relative to Hope Creek. Furthermore, the key team members (see Exhibit V-2) have not had any direct engineering involvement with the Hope Creek engineering a y and design activities. To support this statement each I member of the IDVP team will sign an IDVP agreement and questionnaire (see Appendix B). In addition, the Sargent &

Lundy partnership does not jointly hold PSE&G, Bechtel, or GE stock or ownership. Therefore, S&L is independent from previous Hope Creek engineering and design activities.

C. Design Review Experience Sargent & Lundy is one of the largest multi-disciplined, full-service architect-engineering firms in the country. We (U,} have been a leader in the design of electric generating plants since 1891.

Sargent & Lundy's participation in the nuclear industry began in 1955. Sargent & Lundy has been involved with the complete integrated design of 24 nuclear power plants. A listing of the nuclear units we have designed is included in Chapter VI(see Exhibit VI-3). Sargent & Lundy has been involved with eleven independent design verification or design review programs involving ten nuclear units during the past 5 years (see Exhibit VI-2).

D. Review Team Sargent & Lundy brings o this project a team that is experienced in the design and the design review of BWRs.

The Project Manager will be S&L's primary technical and commercial interf ace with PSE&G and its other contractors. A detail discussion of S&L's organization for this project can be found in Chapter V.

Sargent & Lundy will establish an Internal Review Committee and a Senior Review Committee which will be responsible for reviewing and making recommendations regarding the disposition of observations, and potential y safety-significant observations respectively. The Internal

,o Review Committee will consist of Departmental Design Directors for the major engineering disciplines and the head

(~) of our Quality Assurance Division as chairman. The Senior l

l 3

11- 2 SARGENT & LUNDY REVISION 1 O 4/3/85 -

V Review Committee will consist of Department Managers for the major engineering disciplines, their assistants as alternates and the Director cf Engineering as chairman.

E. Interfacing All interfacing with personnel from PSE&G, Bechtel, GE, other contractors, and the NRC will be in accordance with the communication protocol. (See Chapter VII.)

The S&L program plan precedence diagram (Exhibit III-1) graphically shows the flow of work activities. This diagram is supplemented by Exhibit III-2, Sequence of Design Review Activities, and Exhibit 111-3, Processing of Observations. A discussion of each task in the plan is found in Chapter III, Scope and Approach to Work.

Following the initial preparation tasks a meeting will be held in Bechtel's San Francisco office to review the objective, intent, scope, and administration of the IDVP.

,m

(' ) Information will be supplied to S&L during Task 4.

"' Telephone and written requests may be made during that period. The engineering and design review and analysis will be performed in S&L's Chicago of fices. However, meetings involving key S&L team members are anticipated to take place in San Francisco and San Jose as necessary to clarify, with personal interviews, the design documents supplied in Task 4. Additionally, a meeting is anticipated at the Hope Creek site for reviews, clarifications, and interviews.

Other meetings and telecons will be held as needed.

The Hope Creek plant familiarization tours and systems' walkdowns (Task 5) will be held during the review phase. During the review phase, reporting of observations and potential findings will occur. Exhibit 111-3 shows the procedures for processing these items.

For the purposes of this Independent Design Verification Program, S&L will be reviewing design interfaces at General Electric, Bechtel Power Corporation, PSE&G and other subcontractors as appropriate. This process will involve meetings, telecons, and correspondence as appropriate to accomplish the design verification.

Sargent & Lundy will prepare and distribute required

(] communication and record keeping documents per the U' protocol.

11- 3 SARGENT& LUNDY REVISION 1 4/5/85 (O)

F. Use of Data Sargent & Lundy will hold all proprietary design codes, information, and methods received from Bechtel, GE, and any other engineering or equipment firm in the strictest confidence. Sargent & Lundy will not make use of this information other than in performing the IDVP work and will release it only to S&L employees requiring such information. Sargent & Lundy will return or destroy all material received at PSE&G's direction.

G. Work Output During the course of this work, S&L will provide the following documents to PSE&G and others as provided in the protocol.

o Bi-weekly status reports o A work schedule o Notes of meenngs, telecons, and correspondence o 4 ritten documentation of observations 1 o A final report (by Aug. 2,1985)

A L.)

Om

SARGENTS LUNDY III Scope and Approach to Work III-1 REVISION 1 l ,,)

v 4/5/81 Our approach to work is shown on the precedence diagram (Exhibit III-1).

• The sequence of activities on Tasks 6,7,8. 9,10 and 11 l1 is shown in Exhibit III-2. We will process observations as shown in Exhibit III-3.

A. Tasks Task 1. Finalize Program Plan and Report Outline -

The submittal of this program plan including the report outline (see Exhibit III-8) completes S&L's action for Task 1.

Task 2. Prepare Project Manual in order to properly control engineering assignments, S&L will provide PSE&G with a project manual. The project manual includes the following:

o Program plan Organization chart Schedule o Man-hour estimate p)

o Project administrative instructions o Project instructions Project administrative instructions are prepared to cover interfaces between S&L and PSE&G, its contractors and NRC that are not quality assurance related. Project instrt.ctions are project-specific quality assurance procedures. The remaining sections of the project manual include the Program Plan including organization chart and schedule, and a man-hour estimate. The planned project documents are identified in Exhibit III-4.

l The project manual will be issued to PSE&G for l comments and will be revised to incorporate these l

comments. Additional sections are added to the project j manual as work is assigned. This manual ensures that all quality-related work meets the requirements of S&L's Quality Assurance Program as outlined in Appendix A.

The S&L Project Manager is responsible for setting up the project manual and ensuring that all project personnel are properly instructed in its use.

Task 3. IDVP Kickoff Meeting S&L attended the IDVP kickoff meeting held in Bechtel's offices on Jan. 30, and 31,1985.

(v)

A 4 49 IMAGE EVALUATION 'Ik k>k'y#

%j / TEST TARGET (MT-3) [g%j 4 *,[,f@g,/g kf77

$f'//\p? hp ,h

+ r, 1.0 l? m Eli 5l@ !!!!!E

!E H2g ii i 1.8 j !.25 p.4 y6_

4 150mm >

6" - >

$?%,, /b

• $' Df; ~

sp;gv 4

ijhD, o$f  ;

f g

N\ .

SARGENT& LUNDy III-2 REVISION 1 4/5/85

%s Task 4. Assemble Design Requirements, Design Control and Interface Documents, and Design Documents The timely completion of this project requires that S&L obtain all relevant design requirement documents design control and interfacing documents, and design documents on the designated systems and structures from PSE&G and BPC within 4 weeks af ter identification of those systems. These documents will include, but not be limited to, those listed on Exhibits III-5, III-6, and III-7.

Following the receipt of the design requirements, design control and interface information, and design documents, the detailed design review of elements of the selected systems will begin. These reviews will follow the sequence shown in Exhibit III-2.

Task 5. System Walkdown Sargent & Lundy's Project Manager and key personnel will perform systems walkdowns to familiarize themselves D

(J

(

with the plant. They will use the procedures and checklists prepared as identified in Exhibit III-4 to confirm:

o That the designated systems are configured in the manner for which they were designed.

o That the characteristics used in the design have been properly established and utilized and that the criteria has been applied to the configuration as intended.

The walkdown will visually verify that the selected components, piping and supports have been installed in proper relative positions. Selected components and supports will also be examined to verify such details as relative sizes, weld types, and attachments to the structure.

There is no intention for these walkdowns to include material selection, application, fabrication, examination or inspection, or the pre-service inspection requirements that may be applicable, or the taking of detailed measurements.

PSE&G and BPC will provide working facilities at the site, the necessary personnel to escort the team within the plant, access in the form of ladders or scaffolding and any required training in plant safety and security.

v

SARGENT & LUNDY III-3

,_s REVISION 1

( ) 4/5/85 a

Task 6. Electrical Design Review Task 7. Instrumentation and Controls Design Review Task 8. Mechanical Design Review Task 9. Structural Design Review Task 10. Environmental Qualification and Pipe Break Analysis Review Task 11. Design Control Process Review The activities for Tasks 6 through 11 Oscribed here have been organized to allow a thorough review of the -

specified systems anc cesign process. In the event that the review of the specifiec systems reveals certain design activities which are not accepted by the reviewer, they will be termec potential observations and processec in accordance with an established procedure.

The program will ensure that the potential observations made are fully understood, validated, evaluated as to l.O safety-significance, and closed-out through appropriate corrective action. The first step of internal review will be carried out by the Internal Review Committee comprised of the current Head. Quality Assurance Division and the Mechanical, Structural and Electrical Design Directors, and a Control and Instrumentation Representative. 1 Key steps in processing potential observations are shown in Exhibit Ill-3 including steps by the reviewer and

! other parties. At any point the processing may be closed

, out if the reviewer determines no further action is appropriate.

Upon completion of the review. conclusions will be drawn appropriate to the objectives and commensurate with the review work performed.

l The designated systems to be reviewed are:

i o High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) i o Automatic Depressurization (ADS) o Safety Auxiliaries Cooling System (SACS)

The criteria used to select these systems is shown in Appendix D.

I (o) w/

l

SARGENT& LUNDY III-4 REVISION 1 4/5/85 System boundaries will be as generally described in the FSAR. The review will cover mechanical, structural, electrical, environmental, instrumentation and control, plant arrangements, and fluid system aspects of the design of each system.

The design process will be evaluated by assessing the Hope Creek-specific work, as well as reports of similar reviews of other relevant designs by BPC (i.e.,IDRs on Susquehanna and Limerick and the IDI on Callaway). This will be accomplished through the techniques of both horizontal and vertical reviews.

The extent to which reports of these other reviews will be used will be determined by their relevance to Hope Creek and overall value to assessing effectiveness of the design process on Hope Creek.

The extent of the review in any given technical area 7 ,)

will be determined by the review team, on the basis of the v

safety significance of the area and what is found during the review. If the review detects deficiencies, then the area will be reviewed more intensively. Special effort will be directed to determining the underlying cause for significant or recurring deficiencies.

The review of each system has been divided into four activities: design requirements, design process, design adequacy and general assessment. In practice these activities will be integrated and performed as a relatively continuous activity for each area of the design. That is, each design area being reviewed will(1) have its requirements established,(2) have the design process assessed, (3) be reviewed for technical adequacy, and (4) be incorporated into the evaluation of broader implications.

o Activity 1, Design Requirements Activity I will be to determine the extent to which design criteria or other design objectives meet lic.ensing commitments. These will be used to implement Activities 2, Design Process and 3, Design Adequacy and to assess how design inputs are specified.

(o)

?

111- 5 SARGENT & LUNDY REVISION 1 4/5/85

~

- 1 N/ l The sources of the commitments will be the FSAR, including responses to NRC questions on the FSAR, the SER and supplements thereto, as well as other documents S&L determines to be relevant.

o Activity 2, Design Process Activity 2 will be to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of the design process based upon review of the specified systems and of other technical areas as necessary (ie. high and moderate energy line break analysis - HELBA/ MELBA). In performing this task, reviews will be made to evaluate the extent to which the design process is suf ficiently controlled so that safety-related design requirements are met, and that relevant commitments in the FSAR are complied with. This includes both establishment of suitable controls and proper and consistent implementation of them.

d in making this assessment, due consideration will be given to the extent to which engineering judgment is appropriate, in lieu of written procedures. Recognition will be made of the complexity of the work, how unique it is, qualifications of personnel performing it, and other relevant f actors.

Selected documents in the specified systems will be reviewed for adequacy of procedural requirements, and ,

for general effectiveness in controlling the design process. % here procedural requirements are not applicable, the actual process will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the design is adequately controlled.

Documents reviewed will include those related to design criteria, calculations (both by hand and computer), drawings, specifications, and design change authorizations.

The documents will be reviewed for elements which include the following:

1. Adequacy of documentation of the design p calculations.

O

SARGENT& LUNDY Ill-6 REVISION 1

(

\

gjyjg5 v

2. Interface design control between BPC and General

,- Electric, and other important design contractors.

, 3. Design change and configuration control.

4. Design reviews performed by BPC, covering the specified systems, for technical adequacy.

, 5. As-built drawing reviews to determine degree of compliance with procedures, timeliness of release, and accuracy of information. These reviews will be performed in conjunction with the system walkdown activity.

6. Such other elements related to design control which are embodied in the FSAR and its referenced documents.

[ \ %-

') o Activity 3, Design Adequacy Activity 3 will be to review each of the selected systems for adequacy in meeting the licensing commitments and safety-related design requirements.

These commitments and requirements will be those determined from Activity 1. This will include a review of the installed (as-built) condition as compared to the actual configuration used in the final design.

To assess design adequacy, primary reliance will be placed on the results as described in output documents. It will be recognized there are many ways j to arrive at an adequate design which meets require-

! ments. No attempt will be made to re-verify each step l in designing the specified systems. Instead, the designs l

will be reviewed for accurate inputs and reasonableness of outputs, and adequacy of the design techniques based on a review and sampling of the work. Independent calculations will be performed to the extent appropriate to provide alternate means of verification, but not as a general rule.

In judging accuracy and completeness of design documents, due recognition will be given to established i

(3 4 )

professional engineering practices and other precedents

%)

l

[

i SARGENTS LUNDY III-7 REVISION 1 O

4/3/85 x_/

established in the nuclear industry. This judgment will consider the level of detail needed to link design requirements with the output documents, and the process employed. It will also consider needs to justify design decisions and assumptions.

Selected design documents will be reviewed for the following:

1. Safety classifications, to determine if the structures, systems, and components have been properly classified as to safety significance as defined in 10 CFR 50.

2. Accuracy and completeness of the design criteria and other inpats, including assumptions and codes or standards.

3. Applicability of standard design methods, f'v') 4. Method of analysis, to determine if an appropriate method was used, including mathematical models, and use of standards.

5. Engineering judgments and assumptions and the basis on which they were exercised and utilized.

6. Accuracy of implementing the analysis, including use of properly validated computer codes.

7. Adequacy of means by which designs were verified.

8. Translation of design into output documents, for l completeness, clarity, and proper control.

9. Reasonableness of the output, in relation to similar j designs.

In performing the above reviews, each system will be reviewed from the standpoint of an integrated design, properly coordinated between disciplines. It will include mechanical, electrical, nuclear, instrumentation and control, and civil / structural aspects of the design.

3 l (G

f SARGENT & LUNDY III-8

_ REVISION 1

) 4/5/85 n;

The cut-off dates for the IDVP are: October 8, 1984 for HPCI and ADS; March 21,1985 for SACS and 1 Common Requirements. The design revision applicable at the IDVP cut-off date will be considered as the basis of the review, in-process work will be included, where appropriate.

o Activity 4, General Assessment In Activity 4, the results of Activities 2 and 3 will be assembled and analyzed to determine what conclusions can be drawn regarding systems, structures and components which were not reviewed.

A summary list of observations will be prepared and analyzed for trends and underlying causes, and possible generic implications. Public Service Electric and Gas Company will investigate possible deficiencies in systems or areas out:ide the scope of that review.

L~/ The summary list will be prepared near the end of the review, using all available information, recognizing that conclusions must be commensurate with the nature of what was reviewed.

The objective will be a balanced assessment, and one which emphasizes the likely impact on safety from observations made. As such, both positive and negative results will be considered, and the significance of all of them will be weighed.

Examples of what is anticipated to be included in the review are the following:

Mechanical Systems include process design, environ-mental and separation requirements, and system descriptions Mechanical Components include stress analysis, piping design, pipe supports, environmental qualification, seismic qualification, and design specifications Civil-Structural includes load determination, load combination, analytical techniques, and design

(

g; u.s procedures

SARGENTELUNDY III-9 l

REVISION 1 77 4/5/85 t

v)

Instrumentation and Control include control system design, separation, protection system, and annunciation Electrical Systems include system design, cable separation and system descriptions Electrical and Instrumentation and Control Components include environmental qualification, seismic qualification, design specifications, and cable .

installations Design Systems include procedures and other controls, design tools, and quality program Design Standards include standard drawings and requirements, interpretations of codes and standards and standard specifications

[v) Common Requirements include design requirements for HELB/MELB, fire protection, and Class Il-over-1 design.

Task 12. Review of Observations A Senior Review Committee will be formed comprised of the Director of Engineering and the Mechanical, Structural and Electrical Department Managers (with their assistants as alternates). This Senior Review Committee will review all potential safety-significant observations and will determine the disposition of them as valid or invalid on an individual basis. 1 Task 13. Prepare and Issue Final Report A final report will be prepared and issued. A preliminary outline of the final report is included in Exhibit 11!-8. A!! valid and invalid observations and corresponding PSE&G, Bechtel and GE responses, where applicable, shall be incorporated into the final report.

im

/

SARGENT E LUNDY I[5$sION 1 4/5/85 i0 Task 14. Project Administration The Project Manager will be responsible for the daily administration of this project and will be the major contact at S&L for PSE&G and its contractors. The Project Manager will be responsible for issuing all correspondence, meeting minutes, telecons, and bi-weekly status reports.

O O

M

$ 1 i

2

?

=

-}l mm i .

E

,}

.ii . -

j.

~ , j n

U t .

ll y :l ill

, ill i

it ill.

ill .

, i.h!

ill I I .-

i; ;111 ,

,.,,,,t.,

I e

l'

.Ii .

l l-a -i .l }r i

it' ,

j . i .

O

$ Au m m C

n o  :

a 1

i i_,

az

d Sequence of Design Review Activilles Exhibit 1112 h

l Requirements Checkhsts j identify Design Process i Project instructions Checkhsts s

, Flowcharts Design Aceawacy Protect enstructions Review against requirements i

O General Assessments Observations Trends Processing observations 1

i J

i i

O 6C ' 9- 2 CH5-3'C

• D D

E I.

(m .

II I

!{

Er

!{

Et sI I- IsI l1 If_ ,

i i

4

_. . . . rl 1

";t O

r I: i l

b l-

.. j. .:1:

i

! l J,,~), ,' ). , l.1.{ r >- ,I

!  !  !!:t.,I  ! I i

1 'I .

2 l 211 i ,

4 i

l' l, '

'f)

- l Il .

1 i LO I

t l:i I_

SARGENT S LUNDY Prepared Project Documents Exhibit 111-4 REVISION 1 O

V 4/5/85 Independent Design Review Quality Assurance Project Plan

-(Part of Program Plan)

Project Administrative Instructions SPAl-HC-01 Correspondence with Client ,

SPAI-HC-02 Travel to Client Engineering Offices or Station SPAl-HC-03 Format for Progress Reporting to Client SPAl-HC-04 Procedure for Processing Changes in Scope l

SPAl-HC-05 Implementation of Small Projects Monitoring System Project instructions PI-HC-01 Evaluation of Design Process and Design Adequacy PI-HC-02 Processing of Observations PI-HC-03 System Walkdown O

V

SARGENT S LUNDY Project Design Requirements Exhibit 111-5 REVISION 1 (q/ 4/5/85 Licensing commitments contained in the Hope Creek Docket:

o Final Safety Analysis Report o Hope Creek SER

- o ACRS commitments o Code of Federal Regulations o Industry codes and standards as committed to in FSAR o Applicable IE bulletins, notices, and circulars o Design and licensing commitments made to NRC-NRR and !&E Branches o Fire protection report o Heavy loads report (response to NUREG 0612)

O

r SARGENTS LUNDY Documents Required for Design Exhibit III-6 Control and Interface Adequacy REVISION 1

- (3, Review 4/3/85 *

%J o PSE&G, GE, and Bechtel Quality Assurance Manuals o PSE&G - Hope Creek Generating Station Project Manual o PSE&G - Hope Creek Site Engineering Division Instructions Manual o PSE&G - E&C Department Discipline Procedures o Bechtel- Hope Creek Project Engineering Procedures Manual o PSE&G, GE and Bechtel current organization charts that represent design flow o PSE&G and its contractors' appropriate engineering standards o interface design specifications (GE, Bechtel) .

. m O

Required Design Documents Exhibit 111-7 SARGENT S LUNDY

,.- s I of 3 l 1 REVISION 1 C 4/5/85 Design documents or information anticipated to be pertinent to the systems, structures or components being reviewed include:

o System piping and instrumentation diagrams o General arrangement drawings o Applicable engineering standards o System and component design criteria o Technical specifications o Design installation and test specifications o Design drawing hierarachy o Logic diagrams (with legend sheets) o Loop diagrams o Instrument index o Instrument data sheets o Instrument location drawings o Computer 1/0 list o Annunciator drawings

. ,o o Instrument procurement specifications

('" ) o Control board arrangement drawings o Control board physical drawings o Control board wiring drawings o Intermediate instrumentation cabinet physical drawings o Intermediate instrumentation cabinet wiring drawings o instrument impulse line routing drawings o Electrical singic-line drawings o Electrical schematic diagrams o Electrical raceway and routing drawings o Cable tabs o Termination cards o Master control diagrams or equivalent o Design basis criteria calculations and/or analysis for

- a-c on-site power systems l 1 d-c power systems

- a-c instrumentation power systems

- power cable ampacity and derating

- power and control circuit voltage drop o Cable routing block diagrams o Cable type code listing o Equipment specifications and equipment data packages (9 o Equipment list

'v' o Valve list o Specification index

SANGENT & LUNDY Exhibit 111-7 2 of 3 T REVISION 1

-) kl5ls5 o ASME design specifications o System pip:ng drawings o Piping isometric drawings o Seismic 11 over I assessment report o Flooding report o Pipe whip restraint drawings o GE system design specifications and data sheets o GE instrument data sheets o Environmental data

- o Environmental qualification reports o Approved design change documents o Hanger sketches o Hanger installation drawings o The following design basis documentation:

- Pipe support and restraint calculations

- Pipe support auxiliary steel calculations

- Data prepared for input to the pipe program used in analysis

,-m

- Special calculations used for flange l

qualification

'o - Stress indices calculations used for non-standard fitting including integral attachments

- Structural anchor calculations, if any

- Calculations fo fluid transient loads,if any

- Pipe sizing for pressure and flow including corrosion allowances used in calculating pipe wall thickness o Stress reports including the following aspects:

- Functional capability assurance Pipe break location identifications, based on stress criteria or lack thereof

- Any 151 requirements

- Thermal transient stress evaluation

- Fatigue evaluation of gamma plugs

- Class I fitting details and contours from field measurements

- Stress indices for small taps o Existing input data including:

- Site seismic g-level and related geological data prepared by Dames and Moore Building seismic response spectra prepared by EDS/Impell g)

! /

NJ

SARGENT S LUNDY Exhibit III-7 3 of 3 REVISION 1 O- 4/3/85

- Instrumentation and controls standard specifications provided by Bailey Controls, Inc.

- Standard equipment product literature and test reports supplied by vendors to PSE&G or Bechtel

- Generic engineering or test data supplied by General Electric Company

- Drywell environmental responses supplied by Bechte!

O O

SARGENT E LUNDY Preliminary Exhibit 111-8 Final Report Outline REVISION 1

(, ,) 4/5/85

\_)

1. Executive Summary A. Purpose B. Scope C. Project Org alzation D. Methodology E. Results F. Overall Conclusions

11. Program Detail A. Objectives and Scope B. Systems and Components Reviewed .

C. Method Utilization D. Description of Expertise involvement E. Delineation of Aspects

1. Licensing

2. Design Adequacy

3. Design Procedures

4. Design Interf ace

3. Controi of Design Changes n 6.

7.

Design Reviews As-Built Verification

()

III. Results A. Observations B. Potential Safety-Significant Observations C. Disposition of Potential Safety-Significant Observations IV. Conclusions and Recommendations A. Findings B. Recommendations C. Conclusions -

V. Appendices A. Project Team B. Senior Review Committee C. Management Methodology D. Definitions E. List of Documents Reviewed F. Review Criteria G. Review Records H. Observation Reports I. Dispositions

3. Independence Statement K. IDVP Project Manual

SARGENTS LUNDY IV. Project Schedule and Controls IV-1 REVISION 1

(

4/5/85 G)

A. Project Schedule S&L has divided the scope of work on the project into the thirteen tasks presented on the precedence network l1 (Exhibit !!I-1) described in detail in chapter III.

The precedence diagram illustrates the inter-relationship of each task to its predecessors and successors, and indicates whether tasks are to be performed by S&L or PSE&G.

The precedence diagram will be revised after project commencement to show the following additional .

information as appropriate:

o Assigned character code for each task o Estimated duration of each task in work days o Schedules start and finish dates for each task o Designation of specific lags between tasks The project schedule milestone is targeted as:

1

/7 o August 2,1935, Issue Final Report Q

B. Project Controls and The revised precedence diagram will be used by Reporting Project Manager to monitor and report on project progress. Revised starc and finish dates for a rescheduled task will be shown on the precedence diagram. Also, actual start and finish dates will be added to the diagram as tasks are completed. Graphical notations will be used to show tasks which have started and those which have finished.

The bi-weekly engineering progress report is a cost / schedule report. The format of this report will be tailored to PSE&G's needs.

Oj

SANGENTS LUNDY V. Organization V-1 REVISION 1 v

The review organization team chosen for this project is shown in Exhibit V-1. Resumes for these individuals are included in Chapter VIII.

The project team is supported by enginee s, designers, and other specialized personnel as required to perform the work associated with this project. A listing of anticipated team personnel is shown in Exhibit V-2. Additional personnel will be added as necessary.

A review of the project team's results will be provided by the Internal Review Committee. The Committee will be headed by Mr. H. 5. Taylor, currently the Head, Quality Assurance Division, and will include representatives from the mechanical, structural, electrical and control and l 1 instrumentation engineering disciplines. The i representatives from the mechanical, structural and electrical engineering disciplines will be the Design Directors from each of these departments, n

( ) An executive-level review of the results will be provided by the Senior Review Committee. The Committee will be headed by Sargent & Lundy's Director of Engineering, Mr. 4. G. Hegener, and will include the Department Managers of the mechanical, structural and electrical departments with the Assistant Department Managers acting as alternates. The Senior Review Committee will perform Task 12 with the primary function l 1 of assuring the validity of potential safety-significant observations.

The strengths that S&L's project team and Internal Review Committee will bring to the project are described below.

i A. Project Team o Project Director - P. L. Wattelet Mr. Wattelet, a partner of S&L, is the designated Project Director. He has over 17 years experience in the design and engineering of major Tuclear-fueled electric generating stations. He has been the Project Director for numerous backfit and betterment projects at several nuclear units. He served as Mechanical Project Engineer, Project Manager, and Project Director for a two-unit 2250 MW PWR project. He has been supervisor of (C/} Safeguards Systems Analysis in our Nuclear Safe-guards and Licensing Division, responsible for

SARGENT S LUNDY V-2 REVISION 1 4/3/85 v

methods development and analysis of nuclear safe-guards systems. He is a registered professional engineer in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, and New York.

o Consultant - R. 3. Pruski Mr. Pruski has been associated with the nuclear industry for over 16 years. He was most recently the Project Manager for an 839 MW nuclear unit project. His responsibilities included planning,.

coordination, and performance monitoring for S&L's work on the design, construction, testing, and licensing phases of the project. As a Project Manager and as a Mechanical Project Engineer, he has been responsible for various assignments on numerous projects in our Project Management Division. He served as a member on a task force addressing the S&L Quality Assurance Program.

, , , Mr. Pruski also serves as Task Force Chairman of

( ) S&L's Emergency Planning Program. As a Project V Manager in our Nuclear Services Section, he is

< active in a variety of backfit, betterment, and evaluation projects. Mr. Pruski is a registered professional engineer in New Jersey, Illinois, and Ohio, o Project Manager - W. A. Bloss Mr. Bloss has been associated with the nuclear industry for over 15 years. He was most recently the Chief Support Design Engineer in charge of all pipe support design personnel in S&L's Mechanical Design and Draf ting Division. He has been a project manager on the Commonwealth Edison Company's Carroll County Station. Mr. Bloss is a registered professional engineer in Illinois.

o Mechanical Project Engineer - D. P. White Mr. White, the designated Mechanical Project Engineer, has 18 years of experience in the design, engineering, and analysis of nuclear power plants, including betterment work. He has provided input for PSAR, FSAR, and modification requirement responses for two major nuclear projects. His experience includes serving as a project engineer for S&L on the Commonwealth Edison Company's (G']

SANGENTS LUNDY V-3 REVISION 1 4/5/85 v

Zion Nuclear Station. Mr. White also has 15 years experience with another large A-E. This included working as a Project Engineer on a number of nuclear projects, as a Supervisor of the Mechanical Engineering Department, and most recently, as Manager of the Nuclez.r Section of the Mechanical Engineer Department. Mr. White is a registered professional engineer n Illinois, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wa',hington.

o Structural Project Engineer - O. Zaben Mr. Zaben has 15 years experience in the structural and architectural engineering and design of nuclear power plant structures. He has been involved, at various levels of responsibility, in the planning, design, licensing, and modification work associated with twelve nuclear plants. His responsi-bilities include reviewing and approving plant design n criteria and authorizing construction drawings. He

() is a registered professional engineer in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, New York, and Wisconsin.

Mr. Zaben is a member of the S&L Structural Standards Review Committee.

o Electrical Project Engineer - R. M. Schiavoni Mr. Schiavoni has 13 years experience in the engineering and design of two BWR nuclear generating stations. At increasing levels of responsibility, he has been involved in all phases of the project including conceptual design and layout, equipment procurement and installation, and licensing. In his current position as Senior Electrical Project Engineer, he has principal responsibility for all electrical aspects of the project, as well as the coordination of project efforts within the Electrical Department and its interf acing disciplines. Mr. Schiavoni is a registered professional engineer in Illinois.

B. Internal Review Committee o Quality Assurance Division Head - H. S. Taylor As the Quality Assurance Division Head, Mr. Taylor has developed and maintained QA procedures that are necessary for the implementa-tion of S&L's QA program and has coordinated the

, preparation of detailed procedures by other v

1 1

SARGENT& LUNDY V-4 REVISION 1

~N 4/5/85 i

engineering disciplines. He has been responsible for ensuring that an entire project team adheres to S&L's QA standards and procedures that have been established to meet U.S. government and industry requirements for nuclear power plants. He has been responsible for conducting training sessions in the use and implementation of S&L's QA program and procedures for all personnel involved in safety-related activities and has been responsible for internal and external audits of consulting organi-zations retained by S&L. He has established and maintained controls for identification, storage, and retrieval of safety-related documents. Prior to assuming these responsibilities, Mr. Taylor was the lead Electrical Engineer responsible for the design and engineering of electrical systems for fossil and nuclear power plants, including specifying equip-ment, reviewing specifications, and vendor design documents. He assisted in the preparation of the l } electrical portion of the PSAR for a 1000 MW

'u/ nuclear generating station, o Mechanical Design Director - E. B. Branch Mr. Branch has over 15 years of experience in the stress analysis of piping systems and mechanical equipment for power plants. He has extensive experience not only in the design process, but also with the design philosophy changes that have occurred in the nuclear industry through participa-tion in ASME. PVRC, and NRC licensing activities.

Mr. Branch hus been active in the ASME Working Group on Piping Design, the Subgroup on Design, and the Section III Committee. He is also an active contributor in the PVRC Technical Committee on Piping Systems and is chairman of the Task Group on Industry Practices. He is currently involved in studies leading to more realistic design practices and methodologies. Mr. Branch is a registered professional engineer in the State of Illinois, o Structural Design Director - B. A. Erler Mr. Erler has more than 14 years experience in the design of nuclear power plants, involving work on eight nuclear stations. He has been responsible for the design and analysis of all the containment 7]

(,/

~

1 1

SARGENT& LUNDY V-5 REVISION 1

()

V 4/5/85 f

vessels in S&L's power plants since he assumed his current position. He has supervised the design of prestressed and reinforced concrete containments for many plants and has been responsible for seismic analysis ot these structures. He has helped develop several national standards for the structural design of nuclear power plants. Through his work with professional committees, he has been involved in the development of criteria for nuclear containment design and design for extreme loads on nuclear < plant structures. Mr. Erler is a registered professional engineer in the State of Illinois, o Electrical Design Director - L. fl. Stensland Mr. Stensland has 30 years experience in electrical engineering of steam-electric generating stations. He has worked on numerous station design projects, as well as various backfit projects at both

,,' fossil- and nuclear-fueled plants. Before assuming l his current position, he was the Senior Electrical j (V) Project Engineer for the Illinois Power Company's Clinton Station. His current job responsibilities include monitoring the flow of design information and the effectiveness of the Electrical Drafting Standards and the Draf ting and Field Standards. He currently heads up S&L's task force program for conduit. When required, he reviews and comments on independent design review reports. He is S&L's' l

specialist on transformers and a member of the l I.E.E.E. Committee on Transformers. Mr. Stensland l is a registered professional engineer in Arkansas, lilinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Texas, and Wisconsin.

l l

l v

EXHIBITV-1 REV. 1, 4/b/85 SARCENT : LLNDY HODE CREEK IDVD ORGANIZATION 1

\

v} FROJECT DIRECTOR D. .

h f v?t '_ r

• CONSU. TANT c, y DDutys PROJECT TEAM INTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I

CHAIRMAN TECHNICAL DIRECTION PRCWECT MANAGER AND OVER$1GHT

h. A R! Oc e w. R. TAYtnD STRUCTURAL S&L STRUCTURAL PROJECT ENGINEER DESIGN DIRECTOR C. 2AprN s,A, retro MECMA%1 CAL Shi MECMANICAL PROJECT ENGlhEER ESIGN DIRECTOR

r. p. ww;vr t,n, preNew O

'/ ELECTRICAL S&L ELECTRICAL PPOJECT ENGINEER DESIGN DIRECTOR c, p. scutAycN! ' p. tvENetANr CCNTRO. AND CONTROL AND 1

INSTRUMENTATION I NS TF UMENT ATI ON coofect rNe!Nero ,

RecceerNTAv?ve W. f. P DL'we A FK F C t. CtVAN t

l SENIOR REVIEW COMMITTEE l CHAIRMAN l W. G. HEGENER l

DforcT00 ce ENCfNerotNS l l l MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER STRUCTURAL DEPT. MECHANICAL DEPT. ELECTRICAL DEPT.

J M. M C L A'J0 w L ! N 9. Y. FPENCW g

E.V. A,! D AW A U ,

e i e 8

, i 1 ASST. MANAGE 6 ASST. ANAaEE ASST. MANAGER I

[ h STRUCTURAL DEFT. MECHANICAL DEPT. ELECTRICAL DEPT.

( ,/

I ALTERNATES I

K. T. K0!TAL H. M. SR0xA C. t;. CHIAPPETTA l

L_

SARGENT & LUNDY Hope Creek Team Personnel Exhibit V-2 REVISION 1

/G 4/5/85 (v!

Project Management P. L. Wattelet Project Director R.J. Pruski Consultant W. A. Bloss Project Manager H. G. L. McCullough Project Engineer l 1 Mechanical Engineering D. P. White Mechanical Project Engineer R. M. Tjernlund Component Qualification Engineer .

P. R. Olson Engineering Mechanics Specialist W. D. Crumpacker Control and Instrumentation Engineer V. Reklaitis Senior Project Planning Engineer 1 Structural Engineering O.Zaben Structural Project Engineer T. J. Duf fy Structural Project Engineer R. J. Small Head, Structural Project Engineering Division

, A. K. Singh Assistant Head, Structural Analytical Division v' Electrical Engineering R. M. Schiavoni Senior Electrical Project Engineer W. G. Berger, Jr. Electrical Project Engineer i

Internal Review Committee H. S. Taylor Head, Quality Assurance Division B. A. Erler Structural Design Director E. B. Branch Mechanical Design Director L. R. Stensland Electrical Design Director R. L. Givan Control and Instrumentation Supervisor 1

(

1 Senior Review Committee

[

4. G. Hegener Director of Engineering

J. M. McLaughlin Manager, Structural Department K. T. Kostal Assistant Manager, Structural Department (Alt.)

i E. V. Abraham Manager, Mechanical Department l

H. M. Srcka Assistant Manager, Mechanical Department (Alt.)

R. X. French Manager, Electrical Department l C. M. Chiappetta Assistant Manager, Electrical Department (Alt.)

l I

I sD i

t SARGENT & LUNDY VI. Qualifications and Experience VI-l REVISION 1 o

) 4/5/85 A. Direct and Related Sargent & Lundy has been providing nuclear services for new and operating BWRs and PWRs for over 30 years.

Our nuclear services assignments cover a full range of TMI-related backfits, other NRC requirements, NRC bulletin-designated modifications, and plant betterment modifications. Exhibit VI-l shows the operating BWRs we are currently servicing.

Exhibit VI-2 shows our experience with audits and design reviews similar to the proposed work. We have been involved in eleven such programs on ten nuclear units. <

Included among these is a self-initiated evaluation of the design control, construction control, scheduling, planning, quality assurance, and administrative procedures used in design and construction of the Texas Utilities Generating Company's Comanche Peak Station which S&L conducted.

Sargent & Lundy also has provided personnel to the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations to assist in the O development of procedures and practices used for the

) Construction Evaluation Project (CEP) in the mechanical and instrumentation and controls areas. In addition, an S&L mechanical engineer was a member of the CEP review team for one year.

B. Nuclear Design Experience Sargent & Lundy provides comprehensive engineering, design, and construction management services for electric power generating and transmission facilities. Founded in 1891, we are today one of the nation's leading engineering partnerships. Over the years our clients have authorized us to design more than 700 units representing 90,000 MW of generating capacity. Since 1935, we have provided a wide range of these services to clients on more than 110 projects, including 17 large nuclear units.

Sargent & Lundy's overall nuclear design experience is summarized in Exhibit VI-3.

O v

SARGENTS LUNDY Operating BWRs Sargent & Lundy Exhibit VI-l Is Currently Servicing REVISION 1

(~^ 4/5/85 ,

'd 1 l

l MWT CP Commercial ,

Unit Model Containment Licensed Date Operating Date l La Crosse Unique Unique 165 1963 1969 Dresden 2 BW R-2 Mark i 2527 1966 1971 Dresden 3 BWR-2 Mark 1 2527 1966 1971 .

La Salle 1 BWR-3 Mark 11 3323 1973 1982 La Salle 2 BWR-5 Mark 11 3323 1973 1984 BW R-3 Mark 1 2511 1967 1972 Quad Cities 1 BWR-3 Mark I 2511 1967 1972 Quad Cities 2 Brunswick 1 BTR-4 Mark i 2436 1970 1977 Brunswick 2 BTR-4 Mark i 2436 1970 1975 Susquehana 1 BT R-4 Mark 11 3439 1973 1983 Susquehana 2 BW R-4 Mark 11 3439 1973 1985 O 227,204EX

I SANGENT S LUNDY Experience Complying with Exhibit VI-2 Audits and Design Reviews 1 of 3 REVISION 1 (v~] 4/5/85 Client Station / Unit Description of Audit or Design Review The Cincinnati Gas & Zimmer 1 Bechtel Power Corporation, as the Electric Company construction manager and constructor, performed a detailed review of our design and the status of engineering.

Commonwealth Edison Braidwood 1,2 The Institute of Nuclear Power .

Company Operations conducted an evaluation of our control of the design, including examinations of our organization and administration, design control, project support, training, quality control, and test control. The evaluation involved a detailed vertical path examination through the design combined with a

- horizontal examination at several points.

V' Byron 1.2 Bechte! Power Corporation reviewed our design of the essential service water system, component cooling water system, and 125 volt de distribution system for adherence to design requirements, technical adequacy, and adequacy of the design process.

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission inte-grated design inspection team performed a detailed review of our design of the auxiliary feedwater and containment spray systems. The team evaluated the project organization, the technical aspects of mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and structural design, and the adequacy of compliance with design requirements. The design process, including the adequacy of our design interface with the NSSS vendor, was also reviewed in detail.

The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations conducted an evaluation of

,_s our control of the design, including (V) examinations of our organization and administration, design control, project

SARGENT& LUNDY Exhibit VI-2 2 of 3

/7 - REVISION 1 k.j 4/5/85 Client Station / Unit Description of Audit or Design Review support, training, quality control, and test control. The evaluation involved a detailed vertical path examination through the design combined with a horizontal examination at several points.

Teledyne Engineering Services con-ducted an independent design review of our design for the residual heat removal system in the low pressure coolant injection mode for loop C.

The Detroit Edison Company Enrico Fermi 2 Cygna performed an Independent Design Verification Program of Sargent &

Lundy's design. Included a horizontal review to confirm that an adequate design control process was established s, 3 and implemented; and an in-depth, (j

multi-disciplined technical review to confirm that the as-built configuration agreed with design specifications, criteria, and licensing commitments.

This vertical review confirmed the accuracy and completeness of the design process including interf aces and design changes. Systems investigated included the RHR primary shutdown path compo-l nents, RHRSW fluid path components, l

and the RHR cooling tower.

l Illinois Power Company Clinton 1 Bechtel Power Corporation reviewed our l design of the shutdown service water system, high pressure core spray system, 1

Class IE AC electrical system and common requirements (HELB/MELB, fire protection, seismic II/I interaction) for adherence to design requirements, technical adequacy, and adequacy of the design process.

The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations reviewed our control of design and construction processes O associated with the residual heat O removal system, the shutdown service

SARGENT S LUNDY Exhibit VI-2 3 of 3 REVISION 1

[m)

4/5/85 Client Station / Unit Description of Audit o: Design Review water system, and the auxihary power and dc systems.

Public Service Indiana Marble Hill 1 Nova, an outside engineering consulting firm, performed an engineering review to examine the engineerir'g techniques Sargent & Lundy used in developing the Marble Hill design. The scope of Nova's review was directed to the instrumenta-tion and controls area, it included documentation reviews, field examina-tion and interviews with Sargent &

Lundy engineering personnel.

Texas Utilities Generating Comanche Peak Sargent & Lundy conducted an INPO-Company 1, 2 type, self-initiated evaluation of the construction project including an evalua-

^x tion of the design control, construction l-(Q l

control, scheduling, planning, quality assurance, and administration. The evaluation included examination of Texas Utilities Generating Company organization and administration, the design process, training, quality control, quality assurance, testing, planning, and scheduling and involved a detailed vertical path examination through the organization's design and construction functions, as well as horizontal I

I examination at several points of the design process.

I i

G("%,

l l

SARGENT5 LUNDY Nuclear Units Authorized for Design Exhibit VI-3 by Sargent & Lundy REVISION 1

(^') 4/5/85 C/

Rated Type of Gross Year of Client Station-Unit Reactor

• MW Operation Commonwealth Edison Dresden 2 BWR 850 1971 l Company Dresden 3 BWR 850 1971 Quad-Cities 1 BWR 850 1972 Quad-Cities 2 BWR 850 1972 Zion i PWR 1085 1973 Zion 2 PWR 1085 1974 i La Salle 1 BWR 1122 1982 La Salle 2 BWR 1122 1984 Byron i PWR 1175 1985 Byron 2 PWR 1175 1986 Braidwood 1 PWR 1175 1986 Braidwood 2 PWR 1175 1987 l

Carroll County 1 PWR 1175 2000 Carroll County 2 PWR 1175 2001 l

/

Zimmer BWR 839 Converted * *

(m") The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company Dairyland Power Cooperative La Crosse BWR 48 1969 Illinois Power Company Clinton 1 BWR 985 1986 Public Service Company of Fort St. Vrain i HTGR 330 1979 Colorado l

1 l Public Service Indiana Marble Hill 1 PWR 1175 Cancelled *

• l Marble Hill 2 PWR 1175 Cancelled *

• Southwest Atomic Energy SEFOR LUMBER 7 1967 Associates United Power Association Elk River BWR 20 1961 U.S. Atomic Energy Borax I!! BWR 3 1955 Commission EBWR BWR 5 1956

• BWR - boiling water reactor HTGR - high temperature gas reactor LUMBER -liquid metal fast breeder reactor A PWR - pressurized water reactor (j * *The designs were completed at the time the projects were coverted or cancelled.

210,010EX l

l

SARGENTS LUNDY Vll. Protocol VII-I REVISION 1

(~3, 4/5/85 -

t U

in the conduct of the IDVP by Sargent & Lundy (S&L),

the following protocol shall be adhered to:

1. Recommendations, findings, evaluations and exchange of correspondence, including draf ts between S&L and Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G)

(including its contractors and subcontractors) will be submitted to the NRC at the same time as they are submitted to PSE&G as further clarified below.

2. S&L may recuest documentation material, meet with and interview individuals, conduct telephone conser-sations, or visit the site, PSE&G, Bechtel and others' offices to ootain information without prior notification to tne NRC. Communications and transmittals of information shall, however. be documented and such documentation shall be maintained in a location accessible for NRC examination. Communications between S&L and PSE&G solely with respect to the financial and administrative aspects of the IDVP

,, contract are outside the scope of this protocol.

1 1

l

-/ 3. Following the issuance of an observation report by S&L, PSE&G and Bechtel may discuss the observation with S&L to obtain further clarification and additional information to allow a full understanding of the observation and its basis. Communications and meet-ings snall be documented. Copies of such documen-tation shall be provided to the NRC in a timely manner.

4. Following the issuance of an observation report by S&L, if it is necessary for PSE&G and Bechtel to discuss possible or proposed resolutions with 5&L, the NRC shall be notified 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in advance of scheduled telephone conversations and 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> in advance of scheduled meetings to allow the opportunity for NRC participation. Communications and meetings shall be documented. Copies of such documentation shall be provided to the NRC in a timely manner.

g q ,1

SARGENT& LUNDY VIII. Resumes VIII-l REVISION 1 4/5/85

(-.L)

A. Project Team Listed below are the project team members assigned to the Hope Creek IDVP. Their detailed resumes have been included.

S. G. Hasnain Ashrafi Anup K. Behera William E. Berger, Jr.

James W. Bergeron William A. Bloss William D. Crumpacker Thomas J. Duffy .

Laura L. Fergusson Robert M. Field John Gering Suheil Z. Haddad Robert J. Hammersley Narain V. Hingorani Ismail T. Kisisel Henry G. L. McCullough Andrawos Morcos (m") J. Timothy Naylor Paul R. Olson 1 James M. Pabich Yakub A. Patel Richard J. Pruski Scott F. Putnam Vytautas Reklaitis John M. Rich William C. Roettger Roger M..Schiavoni Anand K. Singh Robert J. Small Michael J. Spisak Robert M. Tjernlund Paul L. Wattelet Donald P. White Jan B. Wisniewski Osama Zaben n

U

Resume 1 cf 5 SARGENT & LUNDY S. G. Hasnain Ashrafi

/m i 1 V

Title Electrical Analyst Electrical Analytical Division Education Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.E.E. - 1977 Bihar Institute of Technology, India - B.S.E.E. - 1964 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Ashrafi is responsible for providing analytical solutions to power plant and system related problems. His work includes the design and review of power plant auxiliary power systems, cathodic protection systems, grounding systems, heat tracing, and the development of protective relaying schemes. His responsibilities cover power system planning work involving load flow and transient stability studies and economic studies dealing with generation expansion.

Experience Mr. Ashrafi has experience in the engineering, design, and technical and economic evaluation of auxiliary power systems. He has developed protective relaying schemes for

(~'N power plant generators, transformers, switchgear, and motors, Q and their interconnections. He has also performed relay setting and coordination. Mr. Ashrafi's experience also includes the design of cathodic protection systems and grounding systems, and the development of single line, relay and metering, phasing, synchronizing, control and logic, elementary, and wiring diagrams.

Before joining Sargent & Lundy in 1972, Mr. Ashrafi had 6 years of field experience as an electrical engineer in the erection, testing, and commissioning of electrical equipment (e.g., switchgear, transformer, and motor cable) at a major coal-fired generating station.

Membership Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers i

t O

v 970,021 071884

l l

l SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 2 of 5 S. G. Hasnain Ashrafi O'

Power Plant Desim Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Coleto Creek 2 Coal 707 1990 Central Power and Grounding system 1984 Light Company design Clinton i Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power Breaker and relay set- 1981-1984 Company tings except for main generator Pleasant Prairie Coal 570 1980/1935 Wisconsin Electric Cathodic protection 1983 1,2 (each) Power Company design for condenser water loss Clinton 1 Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power Design of cathodic 1982 Company protection system for underground pipes Second level under 1982 voltage relaying scheme Henry W. Pirkey I Lignite 707 1985 Southwestern Breakers and relay 1982 Electric Power settings Company Engineering, design, 1977/1978 technical and economic evaluations of auxiliary power systems; prepara-tion of report Dolet Hills I Lignite 707 1986 Southwestern Auxiliary power system 1981/1982 Electric Power design Company / Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.

Schahfer 17 Coal 393 1983 Northern Indiana Relay selection and relay 1981 Public Service report Company Zimmer 1 Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Gas & Design of cathodic protec- 1980 to 1981 Electric Company tion for outdoor piping East Bend 2 Coal 648 1981 The Cincinnati Gas & Design of cathodic protec- 1979 to 1981 Electric Company tion for outdoor piping Edgewater 1-5 Coal 839 1931-1985 Wisconsin Power and Design of protective 1979 to 1981 (total) Light Company relaying scheme Design of cathodic protec- 1979 to 1980 tion system for outdoor Pi ping 970,021 9

071884

sew Experience Record 3 of 5 SARGENT & LUNDY S. G. Hasnain Ashrafi 7-

/

V Power Plant Desian Projects, Continued Rated Gross Operatirs Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Six Standard Coal / 750 Held Middle South Development of protective 1979 to 1980 Coal / Lignite- Lignite (each) Services, Inc. relaying schemes; preparation Fired Units of relay report Main power transformers 1978 study and report Engineering, design, 1977/1978 technical and economic evaluation of alternative auxiliary power systems; preparation of report Hancock i High 650 Held Kentucky Utilities Engineering, design, 1979 to 1980 Sulfur Company technical and economic Coal evaluation of alternative auxiliary power systems; preparation of report

/n

- - - Houston Lighting & ID f an drive; engineering, 1979 to 1980 (V) General Power Company design, technical and economic evaluation of auxiliary power system; preparation of report Dresdeni Nuclear 2M 1960 Commonwealth HPCI system: relay setting 1979 (HPCI System) Edison Company and coordination Gibson 5 High 618 1982 Public Service Development of protective 1978 Sulfur Indiana relaying schemes Coal Ghent 3,4 Low 511 1981/1984 Kentucky Utilities Design of cathodic protec- 1978 Sulfur (each) Company tion system for cooling Coal water pipes and condenser water boxes; preparation of report M. L. Kapp 2 Coal & 233 1967 Interstate Engineering, design, technical 1978 Gas Power Company and economic evaluation of auxiliary power system;

• preparation of report Wolf Creek i Nuclear  !!00 1985 Kansas Gas and Determination of the adequacy 1978 Electric Company of electrical distribution system voltage Havana 6 Coal 439 1978 tilinois Power Final analysis of auxiliary 1977 Company power system O(~~'s 970,021 071884

Selected Experience Record 4 of 5 SARGENT & LUNDY S. G. Hasnain Ashrafi O

Power Plant Design Projects, Continued Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MT Date(s) Client Assimnent Date(s)

Byron 1,2/ Nuclear 1173 1984,1985/ Commonwealth Design and layout of single 1975 to 1977 Braidwood 1,2 (each) 1985,1986 Edison Company line, relay and metering, generator tripping and schematic diagrams; review of specifications for auxiliary power systems; review of speci-fications and of vendor and S&L drawings ior N555 systems Enrico Fermi 2 Nuclear  !!23 The Detroit Edison Review and release of sche- 1973 to 1974 Company matic, logic, and wiring diagrams for N555 systems Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1085 1973/1974 Commonwealth Checking and updating schema- 1972 to 1973 (each) Edison Company tic, wiring, and other drawings Power Plant Betterment Projects Rated Gross Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assignment Date(s)

Morris Township NA NA Allied Corporation 4160 V electrical 1984 Center distribution system-Morristown, New evaluation of existing 3ersey system and development of schemes to improve its capability Texas City NA NA Amoco Oil Company Electrical system inter- 1984 Refinery connection protective relaying considerations and settings Mitchell 4-6,11 Coal 529 Northern Indiana Auxiliary power system 1981 to 1982 (total) Public Service Company capacity expansion study; preparation of report No.IFCV NA NA Amoco Oil Company Relay and breaker settings; 1980 Texas City preparation of report Refinery M. L. Kapp 2 Coal & 233 Interstate Power Evaluation of performance of 1978 Gas Company auxiliary power system 970,021 O.

071884 J

1 i

SfiRGENT & LUNDY Selected ExperierKe Record 5 of 5 S. G. Hasnain Ashrafi in I

t b v

Nih Power Studies Assignment Station - Unit Type of Study Client Assignment _Date(s)

Rancho Seco 1 Spare start-up trank Sacramento Electrical Analyst 1984 former study to improve Municipal Utility station availability District Big Cajun 2 Electrical problems Cajun Electrical Electrical Analyst 1983 1-3 investigation; electrical Power Cooperative, power distribution system inc.

review North Anna 1,2 Develop and evaluate Virginia Electric Electrical Analyst 1983 permanent modifications and Power Company in the electrical auxiliary system to make it comply with NRC guidelines Sorry 1,2 Develop and evaluate Virginia Electric Electrical Analyst 1983 permanent modifications and Power Company in the electrics!

auxiliary system to Og make it comply with NRC (j guidelines Dresden 2,3 Auxiliary system short Commonwealth Edison Electrical Analyst 1982 Quad Cities 1,2 circuit studies; prepare Company report LACBWR Determine adequacy of the Dairyland Power Electrical Analyst 1980 electrical distribution Cooperative system voltage; prepare report in response to NRC request General Study Auxiliary system economic Houston Lighting & Electrical Analyst 1979 to 1980 evaluation using ditferent Power Company ID fan drives; prepare report Dresden 1-3 Determine adequacy of the Commonwealth Edison Electrical Analyst 1979 to 1980 Quad Cities 1,2 electrical distribution Company system voltage; prepare report in response to NRC request Wolf Creek 1 Determine adequacy of Kansas Gas and Electrical Engineer 1978 site-related electrical Electric Company distribution system voltage 970,021 071884

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 l Anup K. Behera (J i Title , Engineering Analyst Component Qualification Division Education University of Illinois - Ph.D (Continuing)

University of Illinois - M.S.E.E. - 1981 Indian Institute of Technology, India - B.E.E.E.

Valedictorian - 1980 Responsibilities Mr. Behera is responsible for the work in component qualifi-cation of safety-related equipment for nuclear power generat-ing stations. This includes writing and reviewing environ-mental requirements for components, reviewing environmental qualification of reports, performing failure mode effects analysis, developing the surveillance, maintenance, and spare parts pr ocurement program, preparing quality lists, performing system analysis, spare parts classification, providing computer services for the data base system of the Component Qualifi-cation Division, and representing the client against Nuclear g Regulatory Commission (NRC) technical audits.

Experience Mr. Behera is currently involved in the equipment qualification program for harsh, mild, and mechanical equipment of nuclear power stations consisting of two ll22-MW units and one 985-MW unit. In addition, Mr. Behera is actively performing qualification work for two 1085-MW operating units to meet IE 79-OlB requirements and four 1175-MW units under construction to meet 10CFR50.49 require-ments. He has also been involved in failure mode effects analysis of systems and components. He has successfully overcome many NRC technical audits for various clients. He helped in developing the surveillance, maintenance, and spare

, parts procurement program and in computerizing this program on a real time data base system. He has written many computer sof tware packages for the environmental qualifi-cation needs of Class IE components.

Mr. Behera spent one year in the Electrical Project Engineering Division before transferring to the Component Qualification Division. His experience includes environmental qualification of Class lE components, application of programmable controllers in large power generating stations, and computer services to the Electrical Project Engineering Division. In addition, Mr. Behera has taught many electrical engineering courses at the University of Illinois at Urbana -

Champaign.

O 970,039 l

031585 1

1

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Anup K. Behera O

Membership Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Honors Second Prize in the Eleventh Design Competition by Institute of Engineers, India - 1980 Silver medal from Indian Institute of Technology, India, for Best Graduate - 1980 National Science Talent Award, India - 1975 Publications " Dynamic Stability of Generators Operating in Parallel and Supplying Low Loading Power Factor Loads," M.S. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana

" Microprocessor, Design and Development," B.S. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur,1980

" Design of 200 MW Power Plant," Institute of Engineers, India, June 1980 0

970,039 031585

I SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Anup K. Behera ex

/

\w Power Plant Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Shoreham i Nuclear 819 1983 Long Island Engineering Analyst I-84 to present Lighting Company (Component Qualification)

La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1122 1982/1984 Commonwealth Engineering Analyst 1-82 to present (each) Edison Company (Component Quahfication)

Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1085 1973/1974 Commonwealth Engineering Analyst 1-82 to present (each) Edison Company (Component Qualification)

Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1175 1985/1987 Commonwealth Engineering Analyst 1 82 to present (each) Edison Company (Component Qualification)

Electrical Engineer 9-81 to I-82 Braidwood 1&2 Nuclear 1175 1987/1988 Commonwealth Engineering Analyst 1-82 to present bi (each) Edison Company (Component (j Qualification)

Electrical Engineer 9-31 to 1-82 Clinton 1 Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power Engineering Analyst 1-81 to present Company (Component Qualification)

Zlmmer ! Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Engineering Analyst 1-82 to 184 Gas & Electric (Component Company Qualification) rh 970,039 031585

SARGENT E LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 William E. Berger, Jr.

/7 i

Title Electrical Project Engineer Education Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.E.E. - 1976 Purdue University - B.S.E.E. - 1972 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Berger directs electrical analysts and draftsmen in development of the conceptual design, design of individual system components, and preparation of bid procurement specifications. In consultation with the senior electrical project engineer, Mr. Berger evaluates the proposals of manufacturers, makes purchase recommendations, and monitors the activities of manufacturers to ensure that manufacturers' drawings and finished components are received on schedule. He works with the client and with manufacturer and contractor representatives to ensure that the electrical design, engineering, and construction of the power plant incorporate the latest techniques. He coordinates the electrical engineering work with that of other Sargent & Lundy Q

O departments. Mr. Berger reviews specifications and drawings to see that all electrical work is correctly done. After plant construction begins, he may make occasional visits to the site to check on progress of the electrical work and to ensure that it is done properly.

Experience Mr. Berger has experience in the electrical design, engineering, and analysis of major steam-electric generating stations, both fossil- and nuclear-fueled. His scope of work has involved the design of plant electrical auxiliary systems, including determination of the size and rating of mapr electrical equipment. Mr. Berge_ r has sized and routed cable and designed control systems. He has also prepared and reviewed specifications, reviewed vendor proposals, and issued letters of recommendation for motors, transformers, switchgear, and motor control centers.

Mr. BerSer has extensive experience in coordinating the electrical interface on nuclear regulatory licensing matters for a pressurized water reactor (PWR) project. This work includes responding to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) questions regarding plant design, regulatory guides, and other NRC documents. He has developed and implemented the environmental qualification program for electrical equipment. He is also currently involved in developing nuclear industry standard criteria for analyzing the reliability of offsite and onsite power systems for nuclear plants.

V 970,042 .

031585

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 william E. Berger,3r.

O Experience, Continued Before assuming his current responsibilities, Mr. Berger was an electrical analyst investigating protective relay schemes, calculating breaker settings, and performing short circuit calculations. He also examined specific motor applications for their voltage profile.

Mr. Berger joined Sargent & Lundy in 1972, left in 1975, and rejoined the company in 1976. For the 14-month period he was absent from Sargent & Lundy, he worked for another archi-tect-engineer in the systems planning department. He did generation and system studies involving stability and load flow analysis. This work involved extensive computer studies and modeling. Mr. Berger also reviewed and developed programs used to design plant auxiliary power systems.

Membership Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

- Nuclear Power Engineering Committee, Subcommittee 4,

" Auxiliary Power Systems"

- Vice Chairman of Nuclear Power Engineering Committee, Subcommittee 4, Working Group 4.3," Loss of All AC Power"

- IEEE Liaison Member on the Atomic Industrial Forum Steering Committee on Station Blackout 970,042 O

031585

SARGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3

~N William E. Berger, Jr.

-(h

\

Power Plant Desian Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 Cancelled Public Service Electrical Project 1977 to 1984 (each) Indiana Engineer Cardinal 3 Coal 615 1977 American Electric Electrical Engineer 1975 Power Service Corporation / Buckeye Power, Inc.

LACBWR Nuclear 48 1969 Dairyland Power Electrical Engineer 1975 Cooperative Fort St. Vrain Nuclear 330 1979 Public Service Electrical Engineer 1974 Company of Colorado Bailly N-1 Nuclear 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Electrical Engineer 1972 to 1974 Public Service O Company Power Plant Betterment Projects Rated Gross Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assianment Date(s)

North Anna 1,2 Nuclear 890 Virginia Electric Electrical Project 1984 to present (each) and Power Company Engineer (review of auxiliary power system)

Brunswick I,2 Nuclear 790 Carolina Power & Electrical Project 1984 (each) Light Company Engineer (review auxiliary relay applications) 970,042 031585

SARGENT S LUNDY Resume 1 of 1 3ames W. Bergeron v

Title Engineering Analyst Component Qualification Division Education University of Illinois - B.S.G.E - 1983 Registration Engineering-in-Training - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Bergeron is responsible for the dynamic analysis of equipment for The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's Zimmer Nuclear Power Station. His responsibilities include modeling and erecuting finite element analysis for determining the structural integrity of equipment, and reviewing seismic test reports provided by the vendor for their acceptability to the client. Mr. Bergeron is also responsible for coordinating and approving recommended modifications on control room panels to ensure the continued dynamic qualification of these new additions.

Experience Mr. Bergeron has experience in using the finite element program SAP-4 for the dynamic analysis of the instrument bmi racks for The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's Zimmer O Nuclear Power Station. For his work on the instrument racks, he applies the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)

Manual Standards and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler & Pressure Code Subsection NF to his analyses. Mr. Bergeron is also responsible for coordinating and approving recommended modifications to the existing control room panels and ensuring these modified panels and the appropriate additions are seismically acceptable. From this work, Mr. Bergeron has experience in preparing and writing a generic Dynamic Qualification Requirement section for a procurement specification and a specification for the dynamic testing of limit switches for The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company in compliance with the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers 344-1975 Standard. Additionally, Mr. Bergeron has experience in FORTRAN programming and has completed a 10-week in-house workshop for advanced FORTRAN. Mr. Bergeron joined Sargent & Lundy in 1983.

O 970,812 040984

SARGENT& LUNDY , inia A. Bim

/

(m

%)

\

Title Associate and Chief Support Design Engineer Mechanical Design and Drafting Division Education Loyola University - M.B.A. - 1977 University of Wisconsin - B.S.M.E. - 1969 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Appointed Associate - 1981 Responsibilities As chief support design engineer, Mr. Bloss is responsible for providing administration and direction to the Support Design Section/ Mechanical Design and Drafting Division. He is responsible for coordinating the section's activities to sufficiently satisfy production and technical requirements.

Through the section supervisors, he ensures the preparation of man-hour estimates and the proper distribution of manpower to efficiently meet project schedules. Mr. Bloss coordinates the section's activities with the work of the various interfacing project teams. By virtue of his position, he has the authority to call upon the resources of the firm to meet the demands of

( the project.

Experience Mr. Bloss has extensive experience in the design and engineering of major steam-electric generating stations. He has worked as a mechanical engineer, mechanical project engineer, or project manager on six nuclear units and four fossil units with a capacity in excess of 7500 MW. He has also participated in studies, analyses, and reports encompassing preliminary engineering evaluations, system designs, piping analyses, pressure and temperature effects on structures, environmental problems, and radioactive waste removal.

Mr. Bloss joined Sargent & Lundy in 1969.

l A

U 970,054 101084

Selected Experience Record 2 of 4 SARGENT & LUNDY William A. Bloss O

Power Plant Design Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignrnent Date(s)

All projects Coordinates and super- 1981 to present vises the Support Design Section of MDDD La Salle i Nuclear 1122 1982 Commonwealth Coordinated the "For 1980 to 1981 Edison Company Record" release of piping system and support designs; re-sponsible for work of MDDD component support personnel in the of fice and in the field Fairview I,2 550 1111nois Power Directed preparation of 1979 to 1980 (each) Company Environmental Report, developed scope of work and project schedule with the client Collins 4,5 Oil / Coal 5% 1978/1979 Commonwealth Directed the design of (each) Edison Company mechanical systems for coal conversion; coordi-nated structural and electrical design with work being done by the Mechanical Department; de-veloped scope of work and project schedule with the client Carroll Nuclear  !!75 2000/2001 Commonwealth Directed the design 1977 to 1979 County 1,2 (each) Edison Company of mechanical systems for nuclear plants, including preparation of design criteria, piping and instrumenta-tion diagrams, and speci-fications; coordinated the Structural and Electrical Departments with the work being done in the Mechanical Department; coordinated the work of Mechanical Divisions to support the project schedule; developed the scope of work with the client; developed the project schedule with the client; and developed the internal project schedale with all departments 970,054 O

101084

Selected Experience Record 3 of 4 SARGENT& LUNDY ,iggi , , 3,gio,,

p Power Plant Desqm Proiects, Continued Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fue_I MW Date(s) Client A ..t Date(s)

Kaiseraugst Nuclear 932 Deferred Swiss Coordinated the design 1976 to 1977 Consortium effort of all disci-plines for the design of GEX containment and internal sy stems, in-ciuding structural design, piping design i

and analysis for i

seismic / transients and accident design such as LOCA and pipe rupture Miscellaneous During the Bailly N1 1975 to 1976 shutdown, participated in the following:

a. Cardinal - minor bid evaluations

b. La Salle - nitrogen piping and instru-mentation diagram

c. Byron /Braidwood -

valve specification bid evaluation Bailly NI Nuclear 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Assumed the position 1973 to 1975 Public Service of Mechanical Project Company Engineer responsible ior the coordination of the Nuclear Steam Supply System contract; the Engineering Mechanics Division (EMD); the Heating. Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Division (HVAC); the Electrical, Mechanical and Structural work in in the reactor building l areas; piping design and j analysis developments and pipe rupture Fort St. Vrain 1 Nuclear 330 1979 Public Service During the Bailly N1 1972 to 1973 Colorado shutdown, worked on the system piping and instrumentation diagram updates to as-built con-dations; coordinated EMD work in seismic system transients and analysis of as-built piping systems; and coordinated pipe rupture 970,0M 101084

Selected Experience Record 4 of 4 SAHGENT & LUNDY william A.Bloss O

Power Plant Design Projects, Continued Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Asslanment Date(s)

Bailly NI Nuclear 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Responsible for the 1971 to 1972 Public Service beginning design stages Company of equipment drains, floor drains, fire protection, and rad-waste systems Quad Nuclear 830 1972 Commonwealth Responsible for the 1969 to 1971 Cities 1,2 (each) (each) Edison Company design and specifica-tion of several systems and equipment which came late in the project; i.e., nitrogen inerting system; supervised the piping analysis for seismic and pipe rupture; and liaison with the field and the General Electric field personnel on miscellaneous items required to complete construction and pre-op testing 970,054 9

101084

l

'; SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 2 William D. Crumpacker 4

i s

Title Control & Instrumentation Project Engineer Control & Instrumentation Division k Education Purdue University - B.S.E.E.T. - 1975

Purdue University - Associate in Industrial Supervision - 1975 f RW 03ities As a control and instrumentation project engineer, Mr. Crumpacker has primary responsibility for the development of control and instrumentation systems for nuclear generating stations. He must perform or delegate all tasks required to be performed on his project. These include i

preparation of design criteria and Safety Analysis Reports; general arrangements of control rooms, computer rooms, and other C&I areas; control and instrumentation diagrams:

' instrument portions of Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams; preparation of instrument indexes, data sheets, logic diagrams, master diagrams, loop schematics, instrument location drawings, and installation details; control board layouts and arrangements; preparation of C&I specifications, evaluation of

s proposals, and purchase recommendations; monitoring of vendor's engineering and manufacturing schedules, and review

of vendor's drawings. He also trains C&l engineers in the performance of these tasks.

! Experience Mr. Crumpvker has experience in the design and j

engineering or control and instrumentation systems for nuclear power plants and for modifications to nuclear power plants.

' He is currently responsible for the engineering design of TMI-i related modifications to the Clinton Power Station. He previously served as the C&I engineer for the initial design, i

system instrumentation, procurement, control room panel design and specifications of control room instrumentation for

the Radwaste Control and Operation Center. This design included engineering of the liquid, y,aseous, and solid l radioactive waste processing and disposal systems.

During a 3-month absence from the firm, before rejoining in January 1982, Mr. Crumpacker worked for another major consulting engineer and was assigned to projects involving TMI modifications.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1976, he was employed by Inland Steel Company as an instrument technician responsible for field maintenance and instrument repairs.

Me..hr.ip Instrument Society of America 970,120 121084

l SARGENT8 LUNDY Selected Experience Record 2 of 2 William D. Crumpacker Power Plant Desian Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Dute(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Clinton 1 Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power C&l Engineer (initial 9-78 to 10-81 Company design, system instru-mentation and procure-ment for the Radwaste Operation Center)

Cal Engineer (control 3-77 to 9-78 room panel design and soecifications of control room instru-mentation)

Design Engineer 5-76 to 5-77 (wiring derign)

Power Plant Betterment Proicets Rated Grcss Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assignment Date(s)

Clinton i Nuclear 985 Illinois Power C&f Engineer 6-82 to present Company (TMI modifications)

Zimmer i Nuclear 839 Illinois Power C&I Engineer 1-82 to 6-12 ,

Company (TMI modifications)

O 970,120

- 4 2108'2

Resume 1 of 4 SARGENT E LUNDY Thomas 3. Duffy p

Title Structural Project Engineer Education University of Illinois - M.S.C.E. - 1971 University of Illinois - B.S.C.E. - 1969 Loras College - B.A. Pre-Engineering - 1969 Registratens Professional Engineer:

Arizona New York Structural Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Duffy is responsible for and directs the work of his department's engineers engaged in the architectural, civil, and structural design of systems and components for major steam-electric generating stations. He disseminates applicable project-related information to the structural design team for each individual project and reviews project work with them to ensure its conformance with client requirements, applicable standards, codes, and regulations, and Sargent & Lundy design c standards. He also interacts with the client to ensure that

(' their requirements are properly integrated into the final design.

Experience Mr. Duffy has been engaged in the design and supervision of the design of the civil / structural systems and components of more than 13 nuclear- and fossil-fueled power plants. He is currently working on one fossil-fueled power plant in the initial stages of design and on a nuclear-fueled power plant in l the final stages of construction. He has been engaged in the l

development of structural design standards dealing with the design of air and gas ducts, cable tray design, boiler suspension steel, and precipitator support steel, as well as coordinating all structural design on these items. He has coordinated the work on civil / structural design criteria, PSARs, and FSARs for l several nuclear power plants. For the past several years, he l has been a member of Sargent & Lundy's Reference Design for a Coal- Fired Unit Committee. He joined Sargent & Lundy in i 1971.

Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers l

American Concrete Institute, Committee ACI 349, Nuclear Safety Related Concrete Structures l 970,156 120784

Selected Experience Record 2 of 4 SARGENT 8 LUNDY Thomas J. Duffy O

Power Plant Design Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station . Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assutnment Date(s)

Enrico Fermi 2 Nuclear  !!23 1983 The Detroit Edison Structural Project 2-83 to present Company Engineer MTA Fossil Plant Coal, Oil, 697 1996 New York Power Structural Project 2-83 to present

& Refuse (held) Authority Engineer Schahier 17,18 Coal & 393 1983/1986 Northern Indiana Assistant Division Head 1-80 to 2-83 Oil (each) Public Service Company East Bend 2 Coal 648 1981 The Cincinnati Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-83 Gas & Electric Company Coleto Creek Coal 1277 1980/1992 Central Power and Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-83 1,2 (total) Light Company /

Central and South West Services, Inc.

Weston 3 Coal 321 1981 Wisconsin Public Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-83 Service Corporation Clinton 1 Nuclear 983 1986 tilinois Power Assistant Chief Struc- 9-78 to 9-79 Company tural Design Engineer Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!73 Suspended Public Service Assistant Chief Struc- 9-73 to 9-78 (each) Indiana tural Engineer Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1173 1983/1986 Commonwealth Assistant Chief 5truc- 9-73 to 9-78 l

(each) Edison Company tural Design Engineer l

Braidwood 1,2 Nuclear 1173 1986/1987 Commonwealth Assistant Chief Struc- 9-73 to 9-78 (each) Edison Company tural Design Engineer La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1122 1982/1984 Commonwealth Assistant Chicf Struc- 3-74 to 9-73 (each) Edison Company tural Design Engineer Zimmer i Nuclear 839 1986 The Cincinnati Gas & Senior Structural 7-73 to 8-73 (suspended) Electric Company Engineer structural Engineer 6-71 to 7-73 2 ion 1,2 Nuclear 1083 1973/1974 Commonwealth Edison Structural Engineer 6-71 to 7-73 (each) Company 1

l O

970,156 120784 l

l

)

1 1

SARGENT & LUNDY 3 of 4 l' Selected Experience Record q Thomas 3. Duffy V

Nuclear Power PLent Betterment Projects Rated Cross Assagnment Station - Unit MW Client Assagnment Date(s)

Surry 1,2 773 Virginia Electric and Structural Project Engineer 2-83 to 10-83 (each) Power Company Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-83 North Anna 1,2 865/890 Virginia Electric and Structural Project Engineer 2-83 to 10-83 Power Company Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-83 Dresden 2,3 850 CommonwealtS Edison Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-83 (each) Company Quad Cities 1,2 850 Commonwealth Edison Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-23 (each) Company Donald C. Cook I,2 2126 Indiana and Assistant Division Head 9-78 to 2-33 (total) Michigan Electric 3 Company Fossil Power Paant Betterment Projects Rated Gross Assigrwrunt Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assignment Date(s)

E. W. Brown 2,3 Coal 156/445 Kentucky Utilities Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Compaty Design Engineer (precipitator backfit)

Green River 4 Coal 125 Kentucky Utilities Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Company Design Engineer (precipitator backfit) 1 Pineville 3 Coal 30 Kentucky Utilities Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Company Design Ecgineer (precipitator backfit)

Beckjord 4,5 Coal 172/240 The Cincinnati Gas & Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Electric Company Design Engineer (precipitator backfit)

Miami Fort 5,6 Coal 80/172 The Cincinnati Gas & Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Electric Company Design Engineer (precipitator backfit)

Lansing 1-3 Coal 58 Interstate Power Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 (total) Company Design Engineer (precipitator backfit)

(m J

1 970,156 120784

SARGENT & LUNDY SekCted Experience Record 4 of 4 Thomas 3. Duffy O

Fossil Power Plant Betterment Projects. Continued Rated Cross Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Anslanment Date(s)

Dubuque 3,6 Coal N.A. Interstate Power Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Company Design Engineer (precipitator backfit)

M.L. Kapp 1 Coal 13 Interstate Power Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Company Design Engineer (precipitator backfit)

Waukegan 7 Coal & Gas 323 Commonwealth Edison Structural Supervising 8-73 to 3-74 Company Design Engineer (precipitator backfit)

O O

970,156 120784

' SARGENT E LUNDY Resume 1 of 2 Laura L. Fergusson O

Title Senior Systems Engineer Engineering Mechanics Division Education - Valparaiso University - B.S.C.E. - 1979

. Illinois Institute of Technology - Completed coursework toward M.S.M.E.

Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Ms. Fergusson supervises piping analysis and related work in her division on project assignments under the direction of the Engineering Mechanics Division project engineer. She prepares schedules and issues status reports, provides technical guidance, and ensures that all project work is properly addressed within the established schedules and in accordance with all applicable standards.

Experience Ms. Fergusson has 5 years experience in all facets of piping analysis. As an analyst on Commonwealth Edison Company's y__ .

Byron /Braidwood and La Salle projects, she performed various static and dynamic analyses. As a system engineer on the

}- Zimmer project, Ms. Fergusson was the lead field engineer.

She worked closely with the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's Generation Construction Division where she proposed and/or evaluated resolutions for support and piping installation problems. She also interfaced with the other Sargent & Lundy divisions and the home office for all of the proposed resolutions. She supervised all piping analysis and related work within her division's scope on the field project assignments. As a senior systems engineer on this project, Ms. Fergusson has been responsible for ,the piping analysis and related work within her division's scope for the home office project assignments.

Ms. Fergusson has also had extensive experience in training and supervising engineers in the use of various analysis techniques, both detailed and simplified, which are utilized for the analysis of nuclear power plant piping. Since joining Sargent & Lundy in 1979, she has trained personnel in performing static, dynamic, flexibility, and transient analyses.

Recently, she coordinated a comprehensive training program, which covered all aspects of safety-related pipe stress analysis and hanger-support design for Wisconsin Electric Power Company.

Memberships - American Society of Mechanical Engineers Western Society of Engineers O

970,940 040584

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 2 Laura L. Fergusson O

Honors Awarded the Certificate of Leadership by the YWCA of Metropolitan Chicago - 1981 O

l l

O 970,940 040584

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Robert M. Field

%s' Title Project Analyst, Safeguard Systems Nuclear Safeguards and Licensing Division Education State University of New York at Buffalo - M.S. Nuclear Engineering - 1979 Argonne National Laboratories - EBR-II Engineering Institute - 1977 State University of New York at Buffalo - B.S. Nuclear Engineering - 1976 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Field is responsible for performing analyses in the areas of thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, hydrodynamics, and heat and mass transfer in support of the design and licensing of nuclear generating stations and developing the computer sof t-ware used in these areas, Mr. Field also has the duties of the safeguard section project engineer to provide an interface between project management and the analysis section.

xperience Mr. Field has performed analyses to evaluate the integrity of nuclear containments and associated safety systems. Areas of investigation have included containment and subcompart-ment pressure response (due to high-energy line breaks),

equipment qualification, and secondary containment functional design.

Mr. Field also has experience in transient analysis and systems interactions, including the development of models and computer programs to analyze the interactions of boiling water reactors (BWR) and suppression pools. Several types of analyses have been performed, including analysis for NUREG-0763, NUREG-0783,10 CFR 50 Appendix R, and Three Mile Island (TMI) Task Action 1.G.I. Additionally, Mr.

Field participated in the planning and execution of Commonwealth Edison Company's La Salle i safety / relief valve in-plant test program. The test involved extensive instrumentation of an operating BWR station (over 200 sensors). Following completion of the test, he analyzed the data and was the principal author of the final test reports.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1979, Mr. Field was employed by Argonne National Laboratories where he worked on liquid metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) safety, with emphasis on degraded core heat transfer. He also developed the fuel management scheme for the blanket of the experi-mental breeder reactor 11 (EBR-II).

n (v) 970,176 06148ts

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Robert M. Field 9

Memberships American National Standards Institute Working Group 56.11 American Nuclear Society (ANS)

O O

970,176 061484

SARGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Robert M. Field

-/ %

{V}

Nearlear Power Plant Desann Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

La Salle 1,2 1122 1982/1934 Commonwealth Edison In-plant SRV Testing 6-32 to 12-3)

(each) Company (planning, execution, data analysis of thermal and pressure measurements, report preparation)

Suppression Pool 1-31 to 8-31 Temperature Assess nent (NUREG-0783) (modeling and program development, analysis and report preparation)

Zion 1,2 1035 1973/1974 Commonwealth Edison Containment Pressuri- 3-82 to 9-32 (each) Company zation Following a MSLB with Runout Auxiliary FW Flow DrfByron 1,2/

t 1175 1985/1936 Commonwealth Edison Assessment of Auxiliary 12-31 to 6-32

\- Braidwood 1,2 (each) Company Building Flooding Due to Internal Line Failures Clinton 1 985 1986 Illinois Power Secondary Containment 5-30 to 3-80 Company Functional Design Assessment Annulus Pressurization 4-30 to 5-30 Due to a Recirculation Line Break i

l Type of Study l Rated l Gross Operating Assignment 5tation - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s) l

Quad Cities 1,2 850 1972/1972 Commonwealth Edison RPV Liquid Level 7-52 to 10-32 l (each) Company and Torus Water Temperature Analysis l for 10 CFR 50 l

Appendix R l

l l

l r

V 970,176 l 061484

SARGENTE LUNDY Resume 1 of 2

_ John Gering

[J Title Nuclear Licensing Group Leader Nuclear Safeguards & Licensing Division Education San Diego State University - M.S. Physics - 1967 University of Wisconsin - B.S. Physics - 1955 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Gering supervises several nuclear licensing engineers who are responsible for review and coordination of nuclear licensing activities for both operating stations and units under construction. His group acts as liaison in licensing matters with regulatory agencies, clients, vendors, and other Sargent &

Lundy divisions.

Experience Mr. Gering has extensive experience in the nuclear power industry. He has conducted numerous walkdowns and field inspections related to equipment safety classification, fire protection, heavy loads, and other system design criteria.

/7 Prior to assuming his present position, he was licensing C/ project engineer for seven operating units of a midwestern utility. His responsibilities included safety-related classification; in-service inspection classification of systems, equipment and components; control of heavy loads at three operating stations; fire protection and alternate safe shutdown capability; Appendix R report and exemption requests at three operating stations; and preparation of design change / plant modification packages for backfit modifications at eight operating units on the eastern seaboard. Mr. Gering joined Sargent & Lundy in 1973.

Memberships American Nuclear Society - Chicago Chapter National Society of Professional Engineers National Fire Protection Association American Society of Testing and Materials -

Section E-5, Fire Standards b

(

970,202 030485

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 2 of 2 John Gering Nuclear Licensing Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Fort St. Vrain 1 330 1979 Public Service Group Leader / Licensing 12-84 to present Colorado Project Engineer

.Shearon Harris 1 900 1986 Carolina Power & Group Leader / Licensing 5-84 to present Light Company Project Engineer Susquehanna 1,2 2161 1983/1984 Pennsylvania Power & Group Leader / 12-83 to present (total) Light Company Licensing Project Engineer (RHR valve replacement)

H. B. Robinson 2 665 1971 Carolina Power & Group Leader / Licensing 7-83 to present Light Company Project Engineer Brunswick 1,2 790 1977/1975 Carolina Power & Group Leader / Licensing 7-83 to present (each) Light Company Project Engineer Zion 1,2 1085 1973/1974 Commonwealth Edison Group Leader / Licensing 7-77 to present (each) Company Project Engineer Dresden 1-3 1900 1960/ Commonwealth Edison Group Leader 3-77 to 3-84 (total) 1971/1971 Company Licensing Project 7-79 to 3-82 Engineer Licensing Project 6-73 to 7-77 Engineer Quad Cities 1,2 850 1972 Commonwealth Edison Group Leader 3-77 to 3-84 (each) Company Licensing Project 7-79 to 3-82 Engineer Licensing Project 6-75 to 7-77 Engineer Surry 1,2 775 1972/1973 Virginia Electric Group Leader / Licensing 6-81 to 3-84 (each) and Power Comps.ny Project Engineer North Anna 1,2 1755 1978/1980 Virginia Electric Group Leader / Licensing 6-81 to 3-84 (total) and Power Company Project Engineer Marble Hill 1,2 1175 Cancelled Public Service Group Leader 10-78 to 8-81 (each) Indiana Licensing Project 10-78 to 7-80 Engineer Kaiseraugst 1 932 Deferred General Electric Licensing Project 2-76 to 6-79 Company Engineer tilinois Power Licensing Engineer 4-74 to 5 75 Clinton i 985 1986 Company 970,202 030485

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 6 Suheil Z. Haddad n

(a.I Title Associate and Head Electrical Analytical Division Education Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.E.E. - 1969 American University of Beirut, Lebanon - B.S.E.E. - 1959 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Appointed Associate - 1980 Responsibilities Mr. Haddad directs the activities of the Electrical Analytical Division, which is responsible for conducting generating and transmission system planning studies, power plant design studies, and other analytical work related to the evaluation of power system designs, performance, and operation. He provides technical supervision to the engineers conducting work assigned to the division and is responsible for the coordination of division activities with other divisions and with the client.

Ov Experience Mr. Haddad has a total of 24 years of experience in the engineering field. He has worked on numerous system planning studies involving short circuit, load flow, and stability analysis. He carried out generation expansion studies involving the economic evaluation of alternative generation expansion plans to determine the optimum unit size, type, and timing.

He worked on major power plants, substations, and industrial systems supervising the design of power plant auxiliary power systems, grounding and cathodic protection systems, and the selection and setting of protective relays. His experience includes the preparation of computer programs to solve electrical design and system planning problems and includes inductive coordination studies and conceptual designs for load control, telemetering, and power plant noise control.

. Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1968, Mr. Haddad worked for two years with the Arabian American Oil Company in Saudi Arabia as a design and staff engineer for power generation and distribution. He also worked for six years with the government of Jordan as a power system planner.

Memberships Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers '

- Subcommittee on Application of Probability Methods, Power System Engineering Committee

- Working Group of Power Station Audible Noise Control, Station Design Subcommittee O

970,234 101884

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 6 Suheil Z. Haddad O

Publications "High Voltage DC" (coauthor T. M. McCauley), Sargent &

Lundy Transmission and Substation Conference, Chicago, Illinois, November 1984

" Evaluation of Requirements for Single Pole Switching on the PLN 500-kV System" (coauthors W. C. Roettger, M. F.

McGranahan,3. A. Bonner, and N. Sudja), The Fif th Conference on Electric Power Supply Industry, Manila, Philippines, November 1984 "The Vacuum Circuit Breaker and Motor Insulation Surge Withstand"(coauthor A. Koutsoukas), American Power Conference, Chicayo, Illinois,1984 and the Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1984 "The Economy of Scale Revisited"(coauthor W. W. Brandfon),

Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1984

" Tests at Braidwood Station on the Effects of Firestops on the Ampacity Rating of Power Cables"(coauthors W. G. Bloethe, H. K. Stolt, D. C. Larken, and G. Sykora), American Power Conference, Chicago, Illinois, April 1982

" Cathodic Protection Requirements in Power Plants,"

Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1982

" Shielding of Transmission Lines and Substations"(coauthor S.

Bhattacharya), 47th Annual Engineering and Operating Conference, San Francisco, California, March 18-19,1982 and Sargent & Lundy Transmission and Substation Conference, Chicago, Illinois, November 1980 "The Economics of Reliability and Scale in Generating Unit Size Selection"(coauthor R.X. French), American Power Conference, Chicago, Illinois, April 1980 and Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1980

" Coming: Higher-Voltage Auxiliary Systems," Electrical World, October 1,1979

" Higher-Voltage Auxiliary Systems," Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1979 0

970,234 101884

SARGENT E LUNDY Resume 3 of 6 Suheil Z. Haddad O

V Ptblications, Continued " Lead-Coated Grounds Beat Corrosion," Electrical World, pp. 92-93, June 15,1976

" Grounding and Cathodic Protection Design," American Power Conference, Chicago, Illinois, April 1976, and Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, March 1976 "A Little Power Goes a Long Way"(coauthor R.X. French),

Sargent & Lundy Transmission and Substation Conference, Chicago, Illinois, November 1972 i

1 " Grounding Mats for Power Plants and Substations,"

Transmission Line and Substation Design Seminar, Chicago, Illinois, December 1970 O

i O

970,234 101884

Selected Experience Record 4 of 6 SARGENT8 LUNDY Suhell Z. Haddad O

Power Plant Design Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1173 1983/1986 Commonwealth Head, Electrical 1973 to 1984 Btaidwood 1,2 (each) 1986/1987 Edison Company Analytical Division (electrical equipment and system design studies)

Schahier 17,18 Coal & 393 1983/1986 Northern Indiana Head, Electrical 1979 te,1983 Oil (each) Public Service Analytical Division Company (electrical equipment and system design studies)

Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!73 Suspenced Public Service Head, Electrical 1973 to 1983 (each) Indiana Analytical Division (electrical equipment and system design

, studies)

La Salle ! Nuclear 1122 1982 + Commonwealth Head, Elect

• cal 1972 to 1982 Edison Company Analytical Division (electrical equipment and system design studies)

Gibson 13 Coal 618 1973-1982 Public Service 59ervisor (power 1972 to 1981 (each) Indiana station design studies)

Rooemacher 2 Coal, 311 1982 Central Louisiana Head, Electrical 1973 to 1980 Lignite, Electric Company Analytical Division Gas, (electrical equipment

& Oil and system design studies)

T elsh 2,3 Coal 312 1980/1982 Southwestern Head, Electrical 1974 to 1980 (each) Electric Power Analytical Division Company (electrical equip-ment and system design studies)

Ghe it I-4 Coal 311 1974-1984 Kentucky Utilities Supervisor (power 1970 to 1980 (each) Company station design studies)

P.o sant Coal 370 1980 Wisconsin Electric Swervisor (power 1974 to 1978 P: orie i Power Company station design studies)

C.Jeto Creek 1 Coal & 370 1980 Central Power and Swervigor (power 1974 to 1978 Lignite Light Company station design studies)

Hsvana 6 Coal 439 1978  !!!1nois Power Swervisor (power 1972 to 1976 Company station design studies)

Baldwin 3 Coal 383 1973  !!!inois Power Swervisor (power 1970 to 1974 Company station design studies)

Powerton 3,6 Coal 828 1972/1973 Commonwealth Electrical Analyst 1969 to 1974 (each) Edison Company 970,234 101884

Selected Experience Record 5 of 6 SARGENT & LUNDY Suheu Z.Haddad O

V Stug Anaipments Assignment M Station Type of Study Date(s)

Perusahaan Umum Listrik Paiton Stability, load flow, short circuit, 1984 Negara, Indonesia and TNA studies for addition of 300 kV transmission f acilities Amoco Oil Company - Interconnection system studies. 1983 Stability, load flow and short circuits Amoco Oil Company _

Texas City Refinery Electrical system stability study 1982 Amoco Oil Company Texas City Refinery New purchase power system study 1982 South Texas, Brazos and - Coordination of joint generation planning 1982 San Miguel Electric studies Cooperative Exxon Company, U.S.A. - Dectric transient stability study 1982 Arizona Public 5ervice Palo Verde Nuclear mit rate case 1981 p Company k Interstate Power Company - Optimal coal unit participation - gas 1981 turbine versus coal capacity ARAMCO Services Company - Stability and load shedd ng study 1981 Amoco Oil Company - Underfrequency load stuelded study 1981 Caterpillar Tractor Company - Electrical distributbri system study 1980 Corn Products - Doctrical distribution system study 1980 Amoco Oil Company Texas City Refinery 5tability, motor starting, and protective 1980 relaying studies Cliffs Electric Compray - Transmission system studies 1980 Sierra Pacific Power Company - TNA study Ior planne1343 kV expansion 1979 Reserve Mining Company - Study of capacitor bank switching transhnts 1979 City Public Service Board of . Inductive coordination study 1979 San Antonio, Texas Wisconsin Power and Light - Coa! versus nuclear generation expansion 1978 Company study CentralIllinois Public Newton Transient stability study 1978 Service Company Wisconsin Power and Light - Inductive coordination between a transmission 1973 Company line and rallroad circuits Bendix Corporation - Planning study for electrical distribution 1973 O system l U 970,234 101884

f J

Selected Experience Record 6 of 6 SARGENT & LUNDY Suheil Z. Haddad O

..a Study Assignments, Continued Assignment Client Station Type of Study _ Date(s)

Amoco Oil Company Texas City Refinery Distribution system study 1973 Amoco Oil Company Wood River Refinery Distribution system study 1974 Wisconsin Power and Light - Comparison of alternatives to nuclear 1973 Company plant participation Oklahoma Gas and Electric -

Higher power system voltage study 1973 Company Texas Electric Service - Inductive coordination study between 1972 Company transmission line and railroad signal circuits Interstate Power Company - Generation capacity addition study 1971 U.S. Atomic Energy - Transmission system changes for a 2300-MW 1970 Commission load at a gaseous diffusion plant Interstate Power Company - Analysis of participation in a nuclear plant 1970 Merchandise Mart, Inc. - Electrical distribution system study for the 1969 Merchandise Mart Building Dow Chemical Company - Protective relaying system study 1969 Dow Chemical Company - Electrical distribution system study 1969 970,234 9

101834

SARGENT F LUNDY Resume ^

i of 5 s Robert 3. Hammersley I

a

)

Title Supervisor, Safeguard Systems Nuclear Safeguards & Licensing Division Education Various institutions - courses, conferences, and workshops addressing advanced engineering topics University of Illinois at Urbana - Ph.D. Nuclear Engineering -

1974 University of lilinois at Urbana - M.S. Nuclear Engineering -

1970 Michigan Technological University at Houghton - B.S.

Chemical Engineering - 1969 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Dr. Hammersley is responsible for the direction and review of the work of a group of engineers engaged in thermo-dynamics, fluid mechanics, hydrodynamics, heat and mass transfer analyses, computer sof tware development, and reliability and probabilistic risk assessment studies in support of the design and licensing of nuclear power plants. He works O) ,~ with clients, manufacturer's representatives, and appropriate regulatory bodies to resolve potential safety problems and develop new and improved methods and techniques of anal-ysis. He coordinates the work of his section with the work of other departments.

Experience Dr. Hammersley has extensive experience in fluid mechanic, thermodynamic, and hydrodynamic analysis. His assignments have included investigations and assessments of the con-tainment and safety-related systems for 13 major nuclear generating units of both the boiling water reactor (BWR) and pressurized water reactor (PWR) types. This work includes containment and subcompartment response to postulated line breaks; combustible gas control (generation, distribution, and monitoring) system studies; containment spray system design; equipment qualification studies; and suppression pool dynamic loading evaluations. He served as the safeguards project engineer for the Kaiseraugst station which provided experience on a unique bunkered decay heat removal system. His assign-ments have also involved the development and app!! cation of system reliability and probabilistic risk assessment techniques to safety system designs and power plant procedures.

Dr. Hammersley has been responsible for performing studies of alternative energy systems which have emphasized solar / wind power and coal gasification/liquef action N

technologies.

. \w,

)

i 970,236 100984

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 5 Robert 3. Hammersley O

Experience, Continued Dr. Hammersley has participated on several nuclear industry committees whose purpose was to address an issue of generic concern to the nuclear power industry. He serves as Sargent &

Lundy's technical coordinator for INPO and directs the appli-cation and use of the Nuclear Network, NPRDS, and LER data sets throughout the entire company. He is currently a member of the INPO NPRDS Users Group. He was a member of the Atomic Industrial Forum (AIF) Subcommittee on Degraded Core Rulemaking and is currently a member of the Subcom-mittee on Probabilistic Risk Assessment. Further, he served as chairman of the Mark 11 Owner's Group Containment Pro-gram subcommittee on submerged structure loads. He served as a member of the Department of Energy (DOE) Working Group on Probabilistic Risk Assessment in support of Public Law 97-567 (Nuclear Safety Act of 1980).

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1974, Dr. Hammersley conducted applied research studies in turbulence and aero-dynamic noise generation at NSAS-Lewis Laboratory. He also qualified as an operations engineer and as such was responsible for assisting in the operating of a nuclear navy prototype power plant used for core testing and naval personnel training at Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York.

The remainder of his industry experience was obtained in an electric power utility's research and development department where he participated in economic evaluations, coal analyses, and chemical and particulate pollution studies.

Memberships American Institute of Chemical Engineers American Nuclear Society Atomic Industrial Forum Subcommittee on Probabilistic Risk Analysis

!!!!nois Society of Professional Engineers INPO NPRDS Users Group National Society of Professional Engineers Society for Risk Analysis Tau Beta Pi- National Publications "Probabilistic Risk Assessment and its Role in Nuc! car Industry Decisionmaking,"(coauthor D. C. Haan), Sargent & Lundy Engineering Conference, March 1983

" Dynamic Interaction of Pressurized Bubbles in a Suppression Pool,"(coauthors J. A. McClary and N. Weber), ASME/ANS Nuclear Engineering Conference, July 1982 O

970,236 100984

SARGENT E LUNDY Resume 3 of 5 Robert 3. Hammersley G

Publications, Continued " Turbulent Pressure in a Co-Annular Jet," (coauthor B. G.

Jones), AIAA Journal, Vol.13, No.12, pp.1601-1606, December 1975

" Rapid Depressurization of Drywell,"(coauthor R. M.

Crawford), Transaction ANS-1975 Annual Meeting, Vol. 21, pp. 343-344, June 1975

" Predication of Far Field Sound Power Levels for Jet Flows from Flow Field Pressure Model,"(with 6 coauthors), AIAA Paper 75-440, AIAA Aero-Acoustics Conference, March 1975 "An Experimental Investigation of the Turbulent e Characteristics of Co-Annular 3et Flows and their Role in Aerodynamic Noise Generation," (coauthor B. G. Jones), ,

Second Interagency Symposium of University Research in Transportation Noise, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, June 1974 p "An ExperimentalInvestigation of the Turbulent sy '

Characteristics of Co-Annular 3ets and their Role in Aerodynamic Noise Generation," Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois,1974

" Turbulent Correlation Measurements in a Two-Stream Mixing Layer."(coauthor B. G. Jones and H. P. Planchon), AIAA-Journal, Vol.11, No. 8, pp.1146-1157, August 1973 "The Turbulent Structure in the Plane Two-Stream Mixing Layer," (coauthors B. G. Jones ,H. P. Planchon and B. W.

Spencer) ASME Joint Meeting of the Fluids Engineering Division and Applied Mechanics Division, pp.87-100, June 1973 i

I i

i qk j 970,236 l 100984

.=

SARGENT 8 LUNDY Selected Experience Record 4 of 5 Robert 3. Hammersley Nuclear Power Plant Projects As a specialist in heat transfer, thermodynamic, fluid mechanics, and probabilistic analyses, Dr. Itammersley works on various projects as needed. He has supervised nuclear projects since he became group leader in March 1977. Dr. Hammersley was appointed supervisor in April 1979.

Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW .Date(s) Client Assignment _ Date(s)

Zion 1 1083 1973 Commonwealth Edison Supervised containment and I-79 to present Company subcompartment analyses in response to NRC questions Dyron !  !!73 1983 Commonwealth Edison Supervised thermalhydraulic 3-78 to present Company and probabilistic analyses in support of the design and licensing of the plant Braidwood i 1173 1986 Commonwealth Edison Supervised thermalhydraulic 3-78 to present Company analyses in support of the design and licensing of the plant Dresden 2 830 1971 Commonwealth Edison Supervised thermalhydraulic, 4-73 to present Company hydrodynamic, and combus-table gas control analyses in support of the design and licensing of the plant Quad Cities 1 830 1972 Commonwealth Edison Supervised thermalhydraulic, 4-73 to present Company hydrodynamic, and combus-tible gas control analyses in support of the design and licensing of the plant Clinton i 983 1986 Illinois Power Company Performed and supervised I 73 to present thermalhydraulic, hydro-dynamic, and combustible gas control analyses for the design and licensing of the plant La Salle i 1822 1982 Commonwealth Edison Supervised probabilistic, 173 to present Company thermalhydraulic, and hydrodynamic analyses carried out in support of the design and licensing of the plant Marble Hill 1 1873 Suspended Public Service Indiana Supervised the H2 recom- 180 to 2-84 biner system sizing, tur-bine missile, and heat transfer analysis Zimmer i 839 Suspended The Cincinnatt Gas & Supervised thermalhydraulic, 173 to 2-84 Electric Company hydrodynamic, and combus-table gas control analyses in support of the design and licensing of the plant 970,2 %

-100934

r-SARGENTE LUNDY Selected Experience Record 5 of 5 Robert 3. Hammersley

\

l -d Nuclear Peaver Plant Projects, Continued Rated Gross Operating V'7 7 ,t Station - Unit MW . Date(s) Client Aasianment Date(s)

Bailly N1 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Supervised thermalhydraulic 6-76 to 12-79 Public Service Company and hydrodynamic analyses in support of the design and licensing of the plant Carroll County I  !!75 2000 Commonwealth Edison Supervised thermalhydraulic l-77 to 9-79 Company analyses in support of the preliminary design of the plant and served as Safe-guards Project Engineer l GEX Kalseraugst 932 Deferred General Electric Supervised therm:! hydraulic 4 76 to 6 78 Company and hydrodynamic analyws in support of the design and licensing of the plant l and served as Safeguards Project Engineer i

l l

l l

l l

i C

\

970,236 10098to

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 af 3 Narain V. Hingarani O;

t

%./

Title Supervising Design Engineer Structural Engineering Division Education College of Engineering (Poona, India) - B.S.C.E. - 1953 (First Class Honors)

Advanced coursework in statistics, PERT, FORTR AN, operations research, and managerial accounting. Special assignment in Western Europe (1961) to study their techniques in the design and construction of cooling towers, pile foundations, and heavy civil engineering works Registrations Professional Engineer - lilinois Structural Engineer - lilinois Responsibilities As structural supervising design engineer, Mr. Hingorani supervises, coordinates and directs the structural design ef forts toward adequacy, consistency, efficiency and toward meeting the project schedule. He ensures that all design work is carried out in accordance with the established company standards, practices and procedures. He reviews and approves calculations, analyses, reports, and drawings performed by (Vn) personnel of his group. He is also responsible for preparing design standards for various structural features on projects.

Mr. Hingorani also ensures that all comments from other departments and divisions are satisf actorily resolved and all vendor information is properly reviewed for incorporation into the design.

Experience Mr. Hingorani's record includes 30 years in structural design and engineering, at increasing levels of responsibility. He has worked on seven nuclear stations. He has directed the analysis and design of prestressed concrete containment and the seismic analysis of plant structures, besides the design of their nuclear plant structures and associated systems. While on special assignment, he developed a standardized work breakdown structure and task flowcharts for structural engineering work items. He has also been assigned, periodically, to study various problems in connection with j timber and concrete cooling towers.

Mr. Hingorani brought 18 years of varied structural engineering experience to Sargent & Lundy when he joined the firm in 1973. He designed and supervised the design of l reinforced concrete natural draf t, induced draf t, and timber l and concrete mechanical draf t cooling towers; reinforced l concrete chimneys; fossil and nuclear power station structures;

[ pile foundations; water storage and public health works; 1 v 970,256 l 083184 l

l t

Resume 2 of 3 SARGENT S LUNDY Narain V. Hingorani O

Experience, Continued industrial and chemical plants; bridges, roads, and railways; and general civil structures. Performing this work in India, England, and the United States, he has been exposed to a wide variety of site conditions, climates, soils, and operating problems. In addition, he has prepared designs for structures in Pakistan, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), and Nepal. He also studied construction methods for six months while visiting Belgium, West Germany, Switzerland, and Italy.

Memberships American Concrete Institute American Society of Civil Engineers Institution of Civil End neers, i England Institution of Structural Engineers, England (Fellow)

Structural Engineers Association of Illinois Publications " Design & Construction of Cooling Towers," Indian & Eastern Engineers, December 1959

" Stresses Due to Temperature in Reinforced Concrete Chimneys," Concrete & Construction, July 1956 0

970,256 033184

SARGENT & LUNDY 5 elected Experience Record 3 of 3 Narain V. Hingarani (m

\j)

Phdear Power Plant Naian Prohets Rated Gross Operating Asilgnment Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client ^ - '_ .c.t

- Date(s)

Fort St. Vrain 1 330 1979 Public Service Supervising Design 8 80 to present Company of Colorado Engineer LACBWR 48 1969 Dairyland Power Supervising Design 8 79 to present Cooperative Engineer Enrico Fermi 2  !!23 1983 The Detroit Edison Supervising Design 8 79 to 4-83 Company Engineer Bailly N1 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana supervising Design 8 78 to 7 79 Public Service Engineer Company Senior Structural 4 74 to 7 75 Engineer Marble Hill 1,2 1873 1988/1990 Public Service Senior Structural 8 77 to 3 78 (each) Indiana Engineer Braidwood 1,2 1873 1983/1986 Commonwealth Edison Senior 5tructural 8 75 to 7 77 (each) Company Engineer o Byron 1.2 1173 1984/1983 Commonwealth Edison Structural Engineering 173 to 3 74 (each) Company Specialist i

O 970,2 %

083184

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Isenail T. Kisise! l O

Title Senior Engineering Specialist Component Qualification Division Education Purdue University - Ph.D - 1971 Middle East Technical University, Turkey - M.S.C.E. - 1966 Middle East Technical University, Turkey - B.S.C.E. - 1965 Registration Professional Engineer -Illinois Responsildlities Dr. Kisisel is responsible for consultation, review, analysis, and design with respect to advanced engineering problems in component qualification projects. Particular assignments include detailed dynamic analysis, fracture mechanics, and creep and fatigue analyses of fossil and nuclear power plant components, such as pumps, valves, fans, and support structures. His experience also includes various computer applications including finite element applications for design and analysis of components and performing onsite and laboratory tests related to rotating machinery and fatigue evaluations.

Esperience Dr. Kisisel has experience in component qualification by analysis and/or testing for nuclear power generating stations.

He has developed the cost-effective dynamic analysis method i

for pumps in nuclear applications, the dynamic flexibility

factor evaluation procedure for nuclear plant equipment, and i

analytical approaches for generic exclusions in case of seismic j interactionshtween power plant components. He also l prepared generic parts safety classification criteria and standard tables for active and passive ASME and Non-ASME

[ mechanical components in nuclear applications. He has j qualified various nuclear steam supply system equipment, participated in startup testing of piping and pumps in core 1

spray and residual heat removal systems that emphasized i vibration measurements. Dr. Kisiset prepared, reviewed, and l

certified fracture mechanics and fatigue analysis engineering reports for large vertical pumps, motor operated valves, and 1 reactor feedwater nozzles, and prepared synthetic time history records for mechanical fatigue Jife determination of various i compnents. He reviewed and modified various condenser i designs for both BWR and PWR units with respect to the high-i energy fluid admission connections addressing structural reliability problems resulting from internal failures in

, addition, he has prepared or reviewed specifications and has i reviewed vendor reports.

O 970,318 021985

SARGENT & LUNDY Q'"*,. %3 ,

2 of 3 O

Experience, Continued Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1980, Dr. Kisiset practiced engineering and performed research and teaching at various academic and industrial institutions. He has held .

Increasingly responsible positions.

Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers American Geophysical Union Honors Dr. Kisisel received U.S. Government Grant - Fulbright Fellowship and NATO Fellowship.

Publicationr. Dr. Kisiset has authored over 20 publications.

O i

O 970,318 .

021985 i l

t

SARGENT5 LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Ismall T. Kisisel U

Power Plant Desimp Proisets Rated Gross Operating *-'....t Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Cuent Assimpment Dete(s)

Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1173 1983/1987 Commonwealth Senior Engineering 1983 to present (each) Edison Company Specialist Clinton 1 Nuclear 983 1986 It!!nois Power Senior Engineering 1982 to present Company Speclahst Enrico Fermi 2 Nuclear  !!23 1983 Detroit Edison Senior Engineering 1982 to present Company Speclahst La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1822 1982/1984 Commonwealth Senior Engineering 1980 to present (each) Edison Company Specialist Zimmer i Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Gas & Senior Engineering 1980 to present Electric Company Specialist i

O 970,318 021985

SARGENTS LUNDY - Resume 1 of 6 Henry G. L. McCullough (v)

Title Project Quality Assurance Coordinator Quality Assurance Division Education U.S. Air Force Officer's Training - Graduate - 1962 University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona - M.S. Program Nuclear Science and Engineering - 1962 Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa - B.S. Physics-Mathematics -

1961 Registrations Professional Engineer - Illinois ASQC - Certified Quality Engineer (test taken)

Responsibilities As a Project Quality Assurance Coordinator, Mr. McCullough is responsible for assisting the nuclear or project team with the effective implementation of the quality assurance pro-gram. Mr. McCullough participates in all audits of Sargent &

Lundy for the assigned nuclear projects. He consults with the project personnel to resolve possible nonconformances.

b) Experience Mr. McCullough has extensive experience in the design, V engineering, and related disciplines o* nuclear steam-electric generating stations. Mr. McCullough is currently assigned as the Project Quality Assurance Coordinator on four nuclear units being designed and under construction. He monitors effective project implementation of Sargent & Lundy's Quality Assurance program and performs periodic reviews (overview) of design control documents, such as design criteria, change documents, calculations, and drawings. He performs investigations throughout the project when potential generic concerns are ideritified on other nuclear projects. These reviews and investigations may cover any engineering discipline, structural, mechanical, electrical, or nuclear.

Mr. McCullough interfaces with nuclear project personnel on matters relating to quality assurance of safety-related items in accordance with the requirements of ANSI-N45.2.ll and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 1.E.

Bulletins and I.E. Notices. As the Project Quality Assurance Coordinator, he provides Quality Assurance requirements to technical consultant specifications and work procedures. His attendance at project interdepartmental meetings, as needed or requested, allows Mr. McCullough to identify potential Quality Assurance concerns or problems for evaluation and resolution.

Mr. McCullough participates in all Nuclear Regulatory O

G Commission (NRC), institute of Nuclear Power Operations 972,863 120584 t

Rmm 2 of 6 SARGENT & LUNDY Henry G. L. McCullough 9

Experience, Continued (INPO), independent, and client audits of Sargent & Lundy on the assigned nuclear projects.

Previously, as a Safeguards Project Engineer, Mr.

McCullough's experience and expertise had been utilized in the design of many nuclear power generating statior.s, six of which are in operation today. He had performed advanced analytical, evaluative, and support analyses for both boiling water reactor (BWR) and pressurized water reactor (PWR) nuclear plant designs. He helped develop and complete a fully automated nuclear fuel cycle and management computer program and the successful benchmarking against plant operational data. He prepared required calculations for safety ar.alysis reports on design basis accidents and postulated high-energy line ruptures in either the primary or secondary containment. The computerized mathematical simulation models he utilized met the Nuclear Regulatory Commission acceptance criteria and had been satisfactorily benchmarked against other industry-wide calculational approaches. He completed the development efforts to improve the mathematical models for two-phase and two-component air, steam, water, and thermal-hydraulic calculations.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1974, Mr. McCullough was a Senior Nuclear Specialist and a Senior Engineer for a specialized nuclear and development consulting firm.

Having detailed nuclear system design experience, Mr.

McCullough was responsible for the verification, expansion, and maintenance of the complete nuclear computer code library of over fif ty programs. He helped develop new marketing avenues and advertising ideas for the nuclear programs. Customer service as a technical consultant, was also provided to individual users in the actual design and/or theoretical evaluation of reactor systems. He also provided consulting assistance to electric utilities and engineering firms who were having difficulties in performing their calculations. Mr. McCullough also worked with new reactor physics analytical and computer techniques for large and small reactors. A preliminary nuclear analysis was performed by Mr. McCullough for a multipurpose prototype plant. He was preparing a determination of conditions for a specific fuel lifetime estimate, using different codes for '

i cross-section generation, transport, diffusion, and depletion calculations, when the project was cancelled.

Before this, Mr. McCullough was an engineering analyst for a major reactor vendor. He helped prepare the determination of the azimuthal xenon oscillations on the O 1 972,863 120584

e SARGENT& LUNDY "** 3 of 6 c,g,,g<cnuangA fh V) r Experience, Continued stability of large reactor cores. This analysis required detailed two-dimensional physics calculations of beginning and different times during core life. The results of this analysis were essential for final core designs and final safety analysis reports for several nuclear plants now in operation. Before this, Mr. McCullough helped develop a digital simulation of an analog model to perform a thermal transient analysis of the core following a loss-of-coolant accident. Output from this program was used to calculate a pressure-temperature time history in the containment building. Results of these programs were used for various safety analysis reports, as well as final nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) design considerations.

Previous to this, Mr. McCullough was commissioned and served in the U.S. Air Force as a research engineering physicist. He performed and directed research in nuclear radiation effects, gas dynamics, and equation of state determinations. He also served as a project officer where he directed a theoretical program based on detailed experiments to predict radiation effect in solids. This work O was essential for further system development. He also used V large digital computer programs to aid in the solution of typical energy transport equations.

Memberships American Society of Quality Control American Nuclear Society (ANS), Chicago Section

- ANS-9, National Standards Subcommittee

- Chairman - ANS-9.7, Standards Working Group Publications " Glossary of Terms in Nuclear Science and Technology,"

ANS Publication (in printing), ANS-9 Subcommittee Member

" LWR In-Core Fuel Management Analysis" (coauthor)

"PWR Benchmark of Computer Code Power /s"(coauthor),

SL-3743,1979 "BIMSA - BWR Image Method Suppression Pool Analysis,"

Computer Code (09.5.142-1.1)(coauthor), May 1976, Proprietary

" Mark II Containment Dyname Forcing Functions

, Information Report"(coauthor), jointly issued by General Electric Company and Sargent & Lundy, NEDO-21061,

September 1975

(

972,863 120584

SERGENT & LUNDY $Q. L. McCullough O

Publications, Continued " Computer Methods for Utility Reactor Physics Analysis,"

Reactor and Fuel Processing Technology (coauthor), Vol.12, No. 2, Spring 1969 O

1 O

972,863 12058te l

Selected Experience Record 5 of 6 SARGENT S LUNDY  % a u mg h

Nuclear Power Plant Desisi Projects Rated Gross Operating  ?" -

.- .t Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client A '_ _.- .t _ DeMs)

Byron 1,2 1875 1985/1986 Commonwealth Project Quality 1-84 to present Braidwood 1,2 (each) 1986/1987 Edison Company Assurance Coordinator Project Management 5-81 to 1-84 Mechanical Engineer Safeguards Project 8-76 to 5-81 Engineer; Nuclear Analyst Engineering Analyst 2-74 to 8-76 Dresden 2,3 850 1971 Commonwealth Project Quality 1-84 to present (each) Edtson Company Assurance Coordinator Nuclear Analyst 8-76 to 11-79 Engineering Analyst 2-74 to 8-76 O La Salle County 1,2  !!22 1982/1984 Commonwealth Project Quality 1-84 to present (N (each) Edison Company Assurance Coordinator Nuclear Analyst 8-76 to 11-79 Engineering Analyst 2-74 to 8-76 Quad Cities 1,2 850 1972 Commonwealth Project Quality 1-84 to present (each) Edison Company Assurance Coordinator Clinton ! 985 1986 Illinois Power Project Quality 8-84 to present Company Assurance Coordinator Nuclear Analyst 8-76 to !!-79 Engineering Analyst 2-74 to 8-76 Zimmer 1 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Project Quality 1-84 to 2-84 Gas & Electric Assurance Coordinator l Company i

l Nuclear Analyst 8-76 to 11-79 Engineering Analyst 2-74 to 8-76 Bailly N-1 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Safeguards Project 8-76 to 5-81 Public Service Engineer; Nuclear Company Analyst Zion 1,2 1085 1973/1974 Commonwealth Nuclear' Analyst 8-76 to 11-79 (each) Edison Company Kaiseraugst 932 Deferred General Electric Nuclear Analyst 8-76 to 11-79 Company / Swiss f\ Consortium b 972,863 120584 t

l

SARGENT S LUNDY Selected Experience Record 6 of 6 Henry G. L. McCullough Nuclear Power Plant Desagn Projects. Continued Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW bate (s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Enrico Fermi 2 1123 1983 The Detroit Nuclear Analyst 8-76 to !!-79 Edison Company Dresden 1 200 1960 Commonwealth Engineering Analyst 2-74 to 8-76 Edison Company Power Plant Betterment Prod Rated Gross Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assignment Date(s)

Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1173 Commonwealth Project Management 1-83 to 1-84 Braidwood 1,2 (each) Edison Company Mechanical Engineer (new eifort pipe vibration testing)

Assignment Type of study / Station - Unit (s) Client Assignment . Date(s)

Nuclear Fuel Evacuation for Public Service Nuclear Analyst 7-78 to 8-78 Marble Hill Generating Station - Indiana Units 3 and 4 0

972,863 120584

Kesume i(13 SARGENT & LUNDY Andrawos Marcos q

Title Assistant Head, Quality Assurance Division Education Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.C.E. 1968 Aleppo University, Syria - B.S.C.E. 1965 Registrations Professional Engineer - Illinois Structural Engineer -Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Morcos is Assistant Division Head of the Quality Assurance Division at Sargent & Lundy. He assists the Division Head in divisional planning and coordination of quality assurance (QA) matters at Sargent & Lundy, represents the Division Head in his absence, participates in NRC or client audits, reviews and comments on S&L Standards, Regulatory Guides, and other documents as required.

Experience Mr. Morcos was on the original task force which prepared the first version of the Sargent & Lundy QA Program and Procedures. Since then he has been a member of the QA Coordinating Committee, representing the Structural h

V Department. In January of 1983, he joined the QA Division as Assistant Division Head.

Prior to joining the QA Division, Mr. Morcos was a senior structural project engineer. In that capacity he coordinated the activities of hydrologists, geologists, soil engineers, architects, and structural engineers engaged in the design and engineering of the structural portions of nuclear power plants.

Previously, as a special project coordinator and senior engineering analyst, Mr. Morcos coordinated the Trans Alaskan Pipeline work assigned to Sargent & Lundy. He did various.

studies on water wave action on submerged structures, coal bunkers, underground pipes, chimneys, seismic instrumentation, probability applications, seismic analysis of structures, transmission towers, and developed and maintained various related computer programs.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1970, Mr. Morcos taught statics dynamics, strength of materials, and structures at the Illinois Institute of Technology. He has also worked as a bridge designer and site engineer.

Mr. Morcos is fluent in Arabic, French, and Spanish, in addition to English.

Membership American Concrete Institute - Committee 117 970,418 021484

SARGENT & LUNDY And a os Morcos l

O Publications Mr. Morcos has written and presented numerous technical papers.

O 970,418 021484

SARGENT 8 LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Andrawas Marcos

~)

Power Plant Dessan Proiects i Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assaanment Date(s)

Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 1988/1990 Public Service Senior Structural 10 73 to 1.83 (each) Suspended Indiana Project Engineer /

Structural Project Engineer From June 1970 to September 1973, Mr. Morcos was responsible for analytical and design methods for various fossil and nuclear power plant structures.

O l 970,418 .,

021484

- - . \._._.-_-__- . , _ - - _ . - . _ . - - _ _ - .

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 3

3. Timothy Naylor n

Title Mechanical Project Engineer Education Union College, New York - Graduate Course Work University of Illinois, Urbana - B.S.E.E. - 1973 Monmouth College, Illinois - B.A. Physics - 1973 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Illinois North Carolina Responsibilities As a Mechanical Project Engineer, Mr. Naylor plans and coordinates all the efforts between the engineering and other support specialists within the mechanical disciplines. ile directly oversees and delegates work to the mechanical engineers assigned to his project. The mechanical project engineer is responsible for the conformance of mechanical project work to applicable Sargent & Lundy standards and procedures. He maintains client contact and incorporates operating philosophies with design parameters, and interfaces with suppliers in selecting equipment, materials and labor packages, evaluates proposals and recommends purchases.

Experience Mr. Naylor has varied experience in the design and engineering of nuclear power plants. He was a Control and Instrumentation Project Engineer within Sargent & Lundy's Control and Instrumentation Division before assuming his responsibilities as Mechanical Engineer and later a Mechanical Project Engineer in the Project Management Division.

Mr. Naylor has been involved in project areas such as coordina-tion of piping and supports analysis, coordination of control and instrumentation design, preparation of specifications, and resolution of field piping, support fabrication, and erection problems.

Mr. Naylor was assigned as Mechanical Project Engineer for an 839-MW boiling water reactor (BWR) plant where he was responsible for piping fabrication and erection specifications, and coordination of structural and mechanical design and l

analysis efforts. He was also mechanical engineer for this project.

Mr. Naylor was recently assigned as Mechanical Project Engineer and Sargent & Lundy Site Coordinator at a two unit l 867-MW BWR operating plant. He was responsible for l coordinating Sargent & Lundy site engineering in working with the utility in areas such as engineered materials control and Q-list development. Mr. Naylor is currently assigned in Sargent &

Lundy's home office to coordinate this and additional design I

work.

I s

970,886 103084

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 3

3. Timothy Naylor O

Experience, Continued Prior to to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1976, Mr. Naylor had three positions with a prime contractor for the Naval Nuclear Program. As an experimental engineer in thermal and hydraulic programs, he was responsible for formulating, planning, directing, and evaluating nuclear power plant related thermal and hydraulic experiments. Previous to this, he was an electrical engineer responsible for the system design, installation, testing, and operational support of nuclear power plant control and instrumentation systems, including primary plant, nuclear instrumentation and rod controls. As an engineer in the nuclear power engineering school, he took courses in reactor plant technology, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid flow, and radiological controls.

Membership Eta Kappa Nu - Electrical Engineering Honorary Association O

O 970,886 103084

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3

3. Timothy Naylor O

Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Brunswick I,2 790 1977/1975 Carolina Power & Mechanical Project 1983 to present (each) Light Company Engineer Zimmer ! 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Mechanical Project 1981 to 1983 Gas & Electric Engineer Company Clinton ! . 985 1986 tilinois Power Contrcl and Instrumen- 1976 to 1981 Company tation Project Engineer 970,886 10308f4

SARGENT S LUNDY Resume 1 of 1 Paul R. Olson I

O i V

Title Supervisor Engineering Mechanics Division Education University of Illinois - B.S.M.E. - 1973 Responsibilities Mr. Olson is responsible for the coordination of project and design work pertaining to the analysis of power plant piping systems. Working with engineering project teams, he supervises design efforts related to all aspects of piping analysis in accordance with ASME and ANSI codes.

Experience Mr. Olson's assignments over the last eleven years have included all phases of fossil and nuclear plant piping layout, design, and analysis. He has been actively involved in analysis work for three major nuclear facilities and has supervised various aspects of engineering work on ten major projects, including PWR and BWR plant designs. Other areas of experience include preparation of design specifications, review of component support designs, preparation of licensing s documents, pipe rupture studies, and all interdivisional and

[d T client / vendor communications to resolve design problems, identify interfacing procedures, and set project schedules.

Memberships ASME Special Working Group on Faulted Conditions Past Member - Mark III Containment Owners SRSS Subgroup

/O V

970,462 061384

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 4 3ames M. Pabich g._

Title Electrical Analyst Education University of Illinois - B.S.E.E. - 1974 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Pabich is responsible for providing analytical solutions to power plant and system-related problems. His work includes determining settings for power station relays and breakers, designing cathodic protection systems and performing short circuit and voltage drop studies for power plant auxiliary systems. His responsibilities cover power system planning work involving load flow studies and economic studies dealing with generation expansion.

Experience Since joining Sargent & Lundy in 1974, Mr. Pabich has performed a variety of analytical tasks. He has completed numerous short-circuit and voltage drop calculations for the design of generating station electrical auxiliary power systems. He has determined the relay and breaker settings for

(-] both coal-fired and nuclear stations. He has designed a number of cathodic protection systems for underground piping and condenser water boxes at various power plants. He has worked on miscellaneous problems involving cable ampacities, power station grounding, and generator relay settings at various power plants.

Mr. Pabich also has performed economic and reliability analyses and quality assurance reviews for various system planning studies. These studies have included the comparison of gas turbine capacity with coal capacity, the comparison of small coal units with large coal units, the economic evaluation of the delay of the installation of a unit, and the evaluation of the sale of capacity from a new unit. He has conducted Appendix R circuit breaker coordination studies which included evaluating uninterruptible power supply systems and short circuit levels of fault locations, checking breaker and fuse coordination, and ensuring cable and equipment protection for both short circuits and overloads. He also has studied the economics of demand control, wind machines, and cycling j versus base load dispatching.

1 r

b o

970,474 060784 l

SARGENT S LUNDY Selected Experience Record 2 of 4 3ames M. PabiCh O

Power Plant Desian Projects Rated Gross Operating A i _. _..;

Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Zimmer i Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Gas & Cathodic Protection System 1982 Electric Company Design Byron 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 1983/1986 Commonwealth Cathodic Protection System 1982 (each) Edison Company Design Schahier 17,18 High- 393 1983/1986 Northern Indiana Cathodic Protection System 1982 Sulfur (each) Public Service Design Con! & Oil Company Gibson 5 High- 618 1982 Public Service Cathodic Protection System 1982 Sulfur Indiana Design Coal Welsh 3 Low- 512 1982 Southwestern Cathodic Protection System 1982 Sulfur Electric Power Design Coal Company Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 Suspended Public Service Cathodic Pr stection System 1981 (each) Indiana Design Pleasant Prairie Low- 570 1980/1984 Wisconsin Electric Cathodic Protection System 1981 1.2 Sulfur (each) Power Company Design Coal Miami Fort 8 Coal 512 1978 The Cincinnati Gas & Cathodic Protection System 1980 Electric Company Design Clinton Nuclear 985 1984 tilinois Power Cathodic Protection System 1978 Company Design Ghent 3,4 Low- 311 1981/1984 Kentucky Utilities Cathodic Protection System 1978 Sulfur (each) Company Design Coal Newton 2 Low- 567 1982 Central!!!inois ' Cathodic Protection System 1977 Sulfur Public Service Design Coal Company Wolf Creek Nuclear  !!00 1984 Kansas Gas & Cathodic Protection System 1976 Electric Company Design O

970,474 060784

5 ARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 4 James M. Pabich

/-~s (v)

Studies V. --.;

Tyse of Study Client /5tation - Unit Assiswnent _ Date(s)

Quality assurance review Carolina Power & Electrical Analyst 1984 of Appendix R breaker Light / Brunswick coordination studies 1, 2 General design criteria 17 Virginia Electric and Electrical Analyst 1983 analysis of the electrical Power Company auxiliary system Generator 13.8 kV and 4.16 kV Wisconsin Power and Electrical Analyst 1983 relay settin6s coordination study Light Company /

Edgewater 5 Single line review Kentucky Utilities Company / Electrical Analyst 1982 Hancock 1,2 A!! relay and breaker settings Northern Indiana Electrical Analyst 1982 Public Service Company /Schahfer 17

,s l

[ ) Coal unit optimum participation South Texas Electric Power Cooperative / San Miguel Electrical Analyst 1982 Q'

Conversion from oil to coal South Texas Electric Power Electrical Analyst 1982 Cooperative /Pearsall Nuclear unit rate casmuclear Arizona Public Service Electrical Analyst 1981 versus coallayoff sales Company /Palo Verde

. Initial design study Central and South West Electrical Analyst 1981 Services /Coleto Creek 2 Fire stop analysis Commonwealth Edison Company / Electrical Analyst 1981 cable ampacity La Salle 1,2 l

Optimum coal unit participation - Interstate Power Company ' Electrical Analyst 1981 gas turbine versus coal capacity 480 kV breaker settings Public Service Electrical Analyst 1981

, Indiant./ Marble Hill I, 2 l

All relay and breaker settings Wisconsin Public Electrical Analyst 1981 Service Corporation /

Weston 3 Single line review Arizona Electric Power Electrical Analyst 1980 Cooperative / Apache 1-3 Fire stop analysis; The Cincinnati Gas & Electrical Analyst 1980 cable ampacity Electric Company /

Zimmer !

Initial design study NorthernIndiana Public Electrical Analyst 1979 l Service Company /Schahfer 17,18

\-s) 97C,474 060784 l

SARGENT G LUNDY Selected Experience Record 4 of 4 3ames M. PabiCh O

Studes, Continued A '; ._.t Type of Study Client / Station - Unit Assignment Date(s)

Various system planning studies Wisconsin Power and Electrical Analyst 1979 performed at WPL offices Light Company Cooling tower system The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Electrical Analyst 1978 Company / East Bend 502 addition Commonwealth Edison Company / Electrical Analyst 1978 Powerton 5,6 Cable ampacity of various Kentucky Utilities Electrical Analyst 1978 underground feeds Company /Ghent 1-4 Large coal units versus small coal Northern Indiana Public Electrical Analyst 1978 units - economics and reliability Service Company Coal versus nuclear capacity Wisconsin Power and Electrical Analyst 1978 Light Company Economics of nuclear unit delay Wisconsin Power and Electrical Analyst 1978 Light Company / Haven Cooling tower system Public Service Indiana / Electrical Analyst 1977 Marble Hill 1,2 Single line review Wisconsin Public Service / Electrical Analyst 1977 Weston 3 Cable ampacity of all American Electric Power Electrical Analyst 1976 underground cables Service Corporation; Buckeye Power,Inc./ Cardinal 3 River pump hose study Commonwealth Edison Company / Electrical Analyst 1976 Byron 1,2 Optimum unit size and timing towa-Illinois Gas & Electrical Analyst 1976 Electric Company /Louisa 1 Conceptual design study The Israel Electric Electrical Analyst 1976 Corporation, Ltd./NPI Coal versus nuclear The Israel Electric Electrical Analyst 1975 capacity Corporation, Ltd.

Initial design study Wisconsin Electric Power Electrical Analyst 1973 Company / Pleasant Prairie 1,2 Initial design study The Israel Electric Electrical Analyst 1974 Corporation, Ltd./MD l-4 970,474 9

060784

SARGENT S LUNDY Resume I of I Yakub A. Patel n

(v)

Title Supervisor, Component Special Application Section Component Qualification Division Education Illinois Institute of Technology - Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering - 1975 Massachusetts Institute of Technology - M.S.M.E. - 1970 Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur - M.P.E. - 1963 University of Baroda - B.S.M.E. - 1961 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Dr. Patel supervises, directs, and reviews the work of a highly technical group of engineers who are responsible for special problems in the equipment qualification areas. He is responsible for elasto-plastic creep-fatigue analysis, fracture mechanics analysis, detailed dynamic and finite element analysis, transient analysis, environmental analysis, and in-situ impedance type testing. Dr. Patel works on several nuclear and fossil power plants.

in (j Experience Dr. Patel has extensive experience in the engineering mechanics and material behavior sciences. He has applied his

-academic and technical knowledge in these areas, applying it hea'vily in the equipment assignments. He has performed extensive finite element stress analyses and nonlinear analyses (considering material and geometry nonlinearities), and he has prepared and followed up on many test specifications.

Dr. Patel has taught engineering mechanics courses at the Illinois Institute of Technology. Prior to joining Sargent &

Lundy in 1972, Dr. Patel had over 10 years of experience in stress and vibration analysis and material sciences.

Memberships American Society of Mechanical Engineers The Society of Sigma Xi, MIT Chapter Publications Dr. Patel has authored or coauthored eight technical papers in dynamics and materials and stress analysis. They have been presented and published in technical conferences and the magazines of ASME, ASCE, and the International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology.

Awards Gold Medal Award - University of Baroda Employee Suggestion Award - General Dynamic Corporation, Rochester, New York p

d 970,486 101184

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Richard 3. Pruski

.m Title Associate and Project Manager Education University of Illinois - M.S. Nuclear Engineering - 1969 University of Illinois - B.S. Mechanical Engineering - 1968 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Illinois New Jersey Ohio Appointed Associate - 1978 Responsibilities As project manager, Mr. Pruski is responsible for the planning, coordination, and performance monitoring of Sargent & Lundy's work on the project. He leads the project engineering staff in the preparation of schedules, the project cost estimate, and the project scope of work. Mr. Pruski con-trols Sargent & Lundy's project engineering man-hour expendi-tures by regularly monitoring expended man-hours versus pro-jected man-hour estimates. He advises the client regarding the project's status in the monthly reports during review meetings and in his day-to-day communications with the O client. He coordinates the development of documents such as design criteria, specifications, licensing documents, schematic and working drawings, bid evaluations, and design instruc-tions. On major purchases, Mr. Pruski works with the client and vendors to select equipment best suited for specialized plant operating duty. By virtue of his position, he has the authority to call upon the resources of the firm to meet the demands of the project.

Experience Mr. Pruski has extensive experience in the design and engi-neering of nuclear-fueled steam-electric generating stations.

He had served for 9 years in his present capacity as project manager on an 839-MW nuclear-fueled unit. Prior to his ap-pointment to project manager, Mr. Pruski served for 5 years as mechanical project engineer, responsible for the coordination of all the efforts between the engineering and other support specialists within the mechanical disciplines. He directed and supervised the work of mechanical engineers assigned to the project. Mr. Pruski was also responsible for ensuring conformance of mechanical project work to applicable Sargent & Lundy standards and procedures. This included preliminary design studies to determine general plant layout and sizing, specifying equipment, analysis of economic factors, preparation of flow diagrams, and sizing of piping including analysis of flexibility and support systems. He maintained client contact and incorporated operating philosophies into J

970,507 101784

Resume 2 of 3 SARGENT& LUNDY Richard 3. Pruski O

Experience, Continued design parameters. He also interfaced with suppliers in selecting equipment, materials, and labor packages, evaluated proposals, and recommended purchases.

Prior to this, Mr. Pruski served as an engineering analyst in the Mechanical Analytical Division where he prepared numerous studies in the area of thermal-hydraulic analysis.

Additionally, he performed engineering studies for power plant cooling systems.

In addition to his responsibilities on project work, Mr. Pruski has also served as a member on a task force addressing the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program. The task force reports directly to the Director of Engineering recommending changes to the Quality Assurance Program and suggesting improvements in engineering implementation. Additionally, Mr. Pruski serves as Task Force Chairman of Sargent &

Lundy's Emergency Planning Program. The task force is responsible for developing company programs for emergency planning to support client requirements for actual emergencies and emergency drills. Mr. Pruski joined Sargent & Lundy in 1968.

Memberships American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

AIF Cost Impact Subcommittee l

O 970,507 101784

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Richard 3. Pruski

(~

(

Power Plant Desimp Proiects Rated Gross Operating V; r.t Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Zimmer 1 Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Project Manager 10-74 to 4-84 Gas S Electric Company Mechanical Project 949 to 10-74 Engineer Dresden 2,3 Nuclear 853 1971 Commonwealth Engineering Analyst 648 to 949 (each) Edison Company O

O

\

970,507 101784

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 2

,, Scott F. Putman Title Supervising Structural Engineering Specialist Structural Engineering Specialists Division Education University of Minnesota - M.S. in Civil Engineering - 1977 University of Minnesota - B.S. in Civil Engineering - 1976 Registration Structural Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Putman is responsible for supervising the work of a group of structural engineering specialists engaged in the structural analysis and design of nuclear containment and Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) component supports, and seismic analysis for the balance-of-plant safety Category I structures for nuclear power plants. His group deals directly with the client and vendors in response to construction and fabrication questions and problems, and provides technical support for licensing of nuclear power plants within the above defined scope. He remains abreast of the state-of-the-art in seismic analysis, containment design, and the associated code

- ('"} and regulatory requirements.

V Experience Mr. Putman has experience in static and dynamic analysis of structures using both classical and finite element techniques.

He is completely familiar with the ASME Code Section III Divisions 1 and 2 used in the design of containment and NSSS component supports as well as the ACI and AISC codes. Since joining Sargent & Lundy in 1977, his assignments have included work on 10 major generating units of the PWR type. Nuclear containment experience ranges from preliminary design and cost optimization through detailed design and construction to ultimate capacity evaluations for pressure and temperature loads. He has dealt directly with the NRC in response to licensing questions on the design of NSSS component supports.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy, Mr. Putman was involved in structural analysis and design of flood control projects with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. He was responsible for development and maintenance of the structural department's program library, and during his stay augmented this library with his own programs and other programs available on the Corps computer system.

Memberships Associate Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Chi Epsilon - National Publications Mr. Putman has co-authored a paper on containment (g) optimization and has contributed to others.

l

</

1183

Selected Experience Record 2 of 2 SARGENT S LUNDY Scott F. Putman 9

Power Plant Design Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Marble Hill Nuclear 1175 1986/1988 Public Service Supervising Structural 11-80 to present 1,2 (each) Indiana Engineering Specialist Senior Structural 11-78 to 11-80 Engineering Specialist Structural Engineering 7-77 to 11-78 Specialist Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1175 1984/1985 Commonwealth Edison Supervising Structural 11-80 to present (each) Company Engineering Specialist Senior Structural 11-78 to 11-80 Engineering Specialist Structural Engineering 7-77 to !!-78 Specialist Braidwood 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 1985/i986 Commonwealth Edison Supervising Structural 11-80 to present (each) Company Engineering Specialist Senior Structural 11-78 to 11-80 Engineering Specialist Structural Engineering 7-77 to 1178 Specialist Mr. Putman has been responsible for performing and supervising the performance of NSSS support design, containment design, and BOP seismic analysis for the six units listed above.

O 1183

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Vytautas Reklaitis p

\

v)

Title Project Planning Engineer Education University of Illinois - B.S. Architectural Engineering - 1960 Registration Architect - Illinois Responsibilities As a project planning engineer, Mr. Reklaitis works with the project team to implement the Engineering Project Monitoring System (EPMS) and any other schedule, progress, and man-hour monitoring systems that may be required to meet the needs of the client, Sargent & Lundy's management and the project team. From the project scope of work, he develops the project scope work breakdown structure and assists the project team in developing precedence networks with task durations and imposed milestone and significant event dates. He inputs man-hour, schedule and progress data to produce the project progress report for distribution to the project team, S&L management, and the client. He analyzes schedule and man-hour performance and prepares variance analysis reports for f- project team resolution. He also adjusts the engineering schedule and work progress to the requirements of the

( '

construction schedule.

Experience Mr. Reklaitis has extensive experience in the structural engineering, design, and drafting of fossil- and nuclear-fueled power plants. He has been associated with 19 fossil-fueled and nuclear-powered sibility. Before assuming designhisprojects current at increasing,bilities in 1983, level responsi he was a structural project engineer. As a structural project engineer, Mr. Reklaitis coordinated the activities of hydrologists, geologists, soils engineers, architects, and structural engineers engaged in the design and engineering of the structural and civil portions of a power plant. He established the basic structural framing system for the plant, selected the foundation system, and prepared detailed design criteria used in designing the individual components of the plant's structural system. He established the scope of work for contracts, technical requirements for materials, and schedules for completion of the work. His work has also included modifications, backfits, and boiler building engineering. He joined Sargent & Lundy in 1956.

Membership American Concrete Institute b

V 970,519 072384

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 2 of 3 Vytautas Reklaitis O

Power Plant Design Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s) 1.4 Salle 1,2 Nuclear  !!22 1982/1984 Commonwealth Edison Structural Project Engi- 1971 to 1983 (each) Company neer/ Assistant Chief Structural Design Engineer Newton 1 Coal 567 1977 Centrai lllinois Assistant Chief Struc- 1973 Public Service tural Design Engineer Company Baldwin 3 Coal 38) 1973 Illinois Power Assistant Chiel Struc- 1973 Company tural Design Engineer ,

Miami Fort 7,8 Coal 512 1973/1978 The Cincinnati Gas & Assistant Chief Struc- 1973 (each) Electric Compac.y tural Design Engineer Powerton 3 Coal 828 1972 Commonwealth Supervising Structural 1969 to 1971 Edison Company Design Engineer Dresden 2,3 Nuclear 850 1971 Commonwealth Supervising Structural 1967 to 1969 (each) Edison Company Design Engineer 2oliet 7,8 Coal & 580 1965/1966 Commonwealth Structural Design 1965 Gas (each) Edison Company Engineer Bailly 8 Coal & 386 1968 Northern Indiana Structural Design 1965 Gas Public Service Engineer Company Haifa B 3,4 Oil 141 1967 The Israel Electric Structural Design 1964 (each) Corporation, Ltd. Engineer Coffeen 1 Coal 358 1965 Central 11tinois Structural Design 1963 Engineer Public Service Company Wood River 3 Coal 356 1964 Illinois Power Structural Design 1962 Company Engineer E. W. Brown 2 Coal 156 1963 Kentucky Utilities Structural Design 1962 Company Engineer Abbott 7 Coal & 7.5 1962 University of Structural Design 1960 Oil Illinois Engineer 970,519 O

0723%

Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 SARGENT & LUNDY Vytautas Reklaitis m

Power Plant Betterment and Smaller Demian Projects Rated Gross ?t _-2.t Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assignment Date(s)

Crawiord, Joliet, Various Various Commonwealth Edison Structural Project 1978 to 1980 Fisk, Powerton, fossi! Company Engineer (18 stack &

State Line, chimney modifica-Waukegan, and tions)

Will County stations Powerton 5,6 Coal 828 Commonwealth Edison Structural Project 1978 to 1980 (each) Company Engineer (conversion to low sulfur coal) 4 Decatur Coking Coal N.A. Chemstrand Structural Design 1965 Plants Engineer Mount Vernon Nuclear N.A. Babcock & Wilcox Structural Design 1965 Works Reactor Engineer Building

1. 11T Boiler Fossil N.A. I!!inois Institute Structural Design 1964 f

Building of Technology Engineer

(

x 970,519 072384

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 2

,_ John M. Rich I

V Title Supervisor, Shielding and Radiological Safety Nuclear Safeguards and Licensing Division Education Michigan State University - M.S. Physics - 1966 Aquinas College - B.S. Physics - 1961 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Rich has the responsibility of supervising the Shielding and Radiological Safety Section of the Nuclear Safeguards and

, Licensing Division. This work includes the design of all radiation shielding and of other radiation protection features incorporated in nuclear power plant design. He supervises, prepares, and reviews sections of safety analysis reports and environmental reports relating to radiological safety.

Experience Mr. Rich has extensive. experience in the radiation protection design of nuclear facilities. His experience includes radiological system analysis, radiation source determination, radiation shielding, and applied health physics. He has been pd responsible for the design in .iese areas on four major nuclear power stations. He has been responsible for establishing radiation protection design criteria and ensuring that such criteria are met in all aspects of station design. He has also been responsible for the analytical aspects of health physics, radiation shielding, and offsite dose determinations, as well as for FSAR input in those areas. Mr. Rich has also been certified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to perform radiological analyses of fallout shelters.

Mr. Rich joined Sargent & Lundy in 1974.

Membership American Nuclear Society ANS - 54.2, Chairman 970,520 072684

_ . ~ , . __ _ -_ _ _ . . _ _-- -- __. _. _ . _ . ._.

SARGENT & LUNDY 2 of 2 Selected Experience Record John M. Rich O

Nuclear Power Plant Deslan Projects Rated Cross Operating Assignrnent Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Zimmer 1 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Gas & Responsible for all 1979 to 1983 Electric Company health physics, radiation :,hielding,

, and offsite dose analysis and design, for both normal coeration and accident ccnditions Enrico Fermi 2  !!23 1983 The Detrcit Edison Responsibit for shield- 1979 to 1980 Company ing and dose analyses for reactor building Bailly N-1 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Respor:sible for all 1977 to 1979 Pub!:c Service Company health physics, radiation shielding, and offsite dose analysis and design, for both normal operation and accident conditions Performed radiation 1974 to 1976 source determination and shielding analysis Marble Hill 1,2 1173 Suspended Public Service Responsible for all 1976 to 1977 (each) Indiana health physics, radiation shielding, and offsite dose analysis and design, for both normal operation and accident conditions O

970,520 072684

Resume 1 of 3 SARGENTa LUNDY William C. Roettger

'O Title Senior Electrical Engineering Analyst '

Electrical Analytical Division Education Purdue University - M.S.E.E. - 1978 Purdue University - B.S.E.E. - 1976 Responsibilities Mr. Roettger is responsible for providir g analytical solutions to power plant and system related problems. His responsibilities include both transient and steady state electrical circuit analysis. He also performs electrical system reliability analyses and protective relaying evaluations.

i-Experience Mr. Roettger has seven years of electrical engineering

- experience. He is currently involved in several power system studies. His work includes the analysis and design of power i plant auxiliary systems and analysis of single pole switching i and parallel resonance associated with high voltage 2

transmission lines. He has written and reviewed Sargent &

+ Lundy's internal standards and has been responsible for preparing computer programs for engineering calculations. In

! s addition, Mr. Roettger has performed short circuit, load flow, and transient stability calculations for power system expansion studies, and he has worked on the reliability analysis of

( electrical systems for major generating stations.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1978, Mr. Roettger was a

~

research assistant at Purdue University.

Membership Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Publications " Single-Pole Switching on Transmission Lines," Sargent &

Lundy Transmission and Substation Conference, November 1984 -

i "The Impact of Shunt Capacitor Installations on Power Circuit Breaker Applications,"IEEE Transactions, PAS Nov/Dec 1980 l

4 l

970,526 i 031885

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 2 of 3 William C. Roettger O

Utility Studies Type of Study Assignment Client / Station Assignment Date(s) 300 kV transmission Perusahaan Umum Senior Electrical 1985 line design (single Listrik Negara, Engineering Analyst pole switching) Indonesia Secondary protection of Virginia Electric Power Electrical Analyst 1984 electrical penetrators Company Evaluation of technical Commonwealth Edison Electrica: Analyst 1982 support center reliability Company Prevention of nonsynchronous Commonwealth Edison Electrical Analyst 1982 interconnection of diesel Company generators and auxiliary system motor loads Adequacy of penetration Commonwealth Edison Electrical Analyst 1981 overcurrent protection Company Transmission loss evaluation Clifis Electric Service Electrical Analyst 1989 short circuit studies Transient network analyzer Sierra Pacific Power Electrical Analyst 1980 and parallel resonance study Company of planned 345 kV expansion Balanced draf t conversion Tennessee Valley Authority / Electrical Analyst 1979 auxiliary power study Colbert Industrial Studies Assignment Type of Study Client / Station Assignment Date(s)

System Expansion Study Amoco Oil Company / Senior Electrical 1985 (load flow and short circuit) Whiting Refinery Engineering Analyst Transient Stability, Under. Amoco Oil Company / Electrical Analyst 1984 frequency, and Protective Texas City Refinery Relaying Electrical System Stability Amoco Oil Company / Electrical Analyst 1982 5tudy Texas City Refinery New Purchase Power System Amoco Oil Company / Electrical Analyst 1982 5tudy Texas City Refinery Electrical Transient Stability Exxon Company, U.S.A/ Electrical Analyst 1982 Study Baton Rouge Cogeneration Project Underf requency Load Shedding Amoco Oil Company / Electrical Analyst 1981 Study Texas City Refinery 970,526 031885

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 William C. Roettger

(

V indstrial Studies. Continued Assignment Type of Study Client /5tation Assumment Date(s)

Electrical System Expansion Amoco Oil Company / Electrical Analyst 1981 Study Texas City Refinery

- $tudy of Capacitor Bank Reserve Mining Company Electrical Analyst 1980 Switching Transients Power System Study Corn Products Corporation Electrical Analyst 1980 Electric Distribution Study Aegonne National Laboratory Electrical Analyst 1978

\

i

(

l l

i l O 970,526 j

031885

SARGENT5 LUNDY Resume 1 of 3.

Roger M. Schiavoni n

v Title Senior Electrical Project Engineer Electrical Project Engineering Division Fdier ation University of Illinois - B.S.E.E. - 1971 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities ~ Mr. Schiavoni directs electrical engineers, analysts, and draftsmen in the development of the conceptual design, the design of individual system components, and the preparation of bid procurement specifications. Mr. Schiavoni supervises the project electrical engineering team that evaluates the proposals of manufacturers, makes purchase recommendations, and monitors the activities of manufacturers to ensure that manuf acturers' drawings and finished components are received on schedule. He works with the client and with manufacturer and contractor representatives to ensure that the electrical design, engineering, and construction of the power plant incorporate the latest techniques. He coordinates the electrical engineering work with that of other Sargent & Lundy O departments. Mr. Schiavoni reviews specifications and drawings to ensure that all electrical work is correctly done.

After plant construction begins, he may make occasional visits to the site to check on progress of the electrical work and to ensure that it is done properly.

Experience Mr. Schiavoni has extensive experience in the electrical.

design and engineering of nuclear generating stations. Since joining Sargent & Lundy in 1971, he has been involved with two nuclear stations and currently has the principal responsibility for the engineering and design of all electrical aspects of a two-unit nuclear-powered generating station. His assignments have included electrical design work related to' turbine-generator and main cycle systems as well as the main and auxiliary power systems. He has participated in specifying, evaluating, and integrating such items as the main and auxiliary power transformers, isolated and nonsegregated phase buses, medium and low voltage switchgear, large motors, and main control boards into the overall station design. Other responsibilities have included administration and coordination of the electricalinstallation contract with the client and contractor, and coordination of electrical portionr. of the safety analysis report.

O 970,554 031885

Resume 2 of 3 SARGENT S LUNDY Roger M. Schiavoni O

Experience, Continued From 1978 through 1982, Mr. Schiavoni served on the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Coordinating Committee.

This committee is responsible for reviewing, resolving, and coordinating departmental comments on the firm's quality assurance program and procedures. Committee members also serve as liaison between their respective engineering departments and the Quality Assurance Division.

Mr. Schiavoni joined Sargent & Lundy in 1971.

O 970,554 O

l 031885 l

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Roger M. Schiavoni

'C

( -

Nelaar Power Plant Desisp Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

La Salle 1,2 1122 1912/1984 Commonwealth Senior Electrical 10-81 to present (each) Edison Company Project Engineer Electrical Project I-77 to 9-81 4

Engineer Electrical Engineer 6-71 to 12-76 Enrico Fermi 2 1123 1983 The Detroit Edison Electrical Engineer 6-71 to 6-72 Company

. Ov i

1 l

l l

O 970,554 031885

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 8 Anand K. Singh p

i C

Title Associate and Assistant Head Structural Analytical Division Education University of Illinois - Ph.D. Structural Engineering - 1972 University of Illinois - M.S. Structural Engineering - 1970 Indian Institute of Technology - B.S.C.E. - 1965 Registrations Professional Engineer - Illinois Structural Engineer - Illinois Appointed Associate - 1980 Responsibilities Dr. Singh supervises and coordinates the work of the Structural Analysis Sections in the preparation of analytical studies, special problem analyses, and computer program development.

Experience Dr. Singh has been engaged in static and dynamic analyses of power plant structures and in the development of general purpose computer programs for static, dynamic, and code i

' O

(,/

stress analyses of structures and piping. He has been involved in seismic response analysis of structures and piping, soil structure interaction; boiling water reactor (BWR) pool dynamics due to safety / relief valve (SRV) and loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA); design and analysis of cable trays and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) ducts; design of buried pipelines; design of pipe whip restraints; nonlinear response analysis; and American Iron & Steel Institute (AISI),

American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), and American l Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code stress analysis

of structures and piping systems. In addition, he has worked to I apply new concepts in earthquake engineering and vibrations to i power plant structures.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1972, Dr. Singh worked as a research assistant in the areas of earthquake engineering and computer program development, and as a design engineer l

of buildings and foundations.

i Membership American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) i - Committee on Nuclear Standards - Seismic Analysis of i Safety Class Structures Committee l - Task Committee on Turbine Foundations

- Nuclear Structures and Materials - Dynamic Analysis Committee O) 970,587 101584 I

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 2 of 8 Anand K. Singh O

Publications "A Stochastic Model for Predicting Seismic Response of Light Secondary Systems" (coauthor A. H. S. Ang), Proceedings of the Fif th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, 1973

" Influence of Closely Spaced Modes in Response Spectrum I Method of Analysis" (coauthors S. L. Chu and S. Singh),

Proceedings, ASCE Specialty Conference on Structural Design of Nuclear Plant Facilities, Chicago, Illinois, December 1973

" Stochastic Prediction of Maximum Seismic Response of Light Secondary Systems" (coauthor A. H. S. Ang), Nuclear Engineering and Design 29, pp. 218-230,1974 l

" Reliability Assessment of ASME Code Equations for Nuclear Components" (coauthor M. K. Ravindra), Reliability Engineering in Pressure Vessels and Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), June 1975

" Seismic Response of Pipelines on Friction Supports"(coauthor J. C. Anderson), Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, EM2, pp. 275-291, April 1976

" Inelastic Response of Nuclear Piping Subjected to Rupture Forces" (coauthor J. C. Anderson), Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, ASME, pp.98-104, May 1976 "A Probabilistic Model for Seismic Analysis of Nuclear Plant Structures" (coauthor S. Singh), Paper K3/3, 4th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, San Francisco, Calif ornia, August 15-19, 1977

" Dynamic Analysis of Piping Systems Using Substructures" (coauthor V. Kumar), presented at the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Chicago, Illinois, Preprint No. 77-DET-144, September 26-30, 1977

" Technical Bases for the Use of the Square Root of the Sum of Squares (SRSS) Method ior Combining Dynamic Loads for Mark 11 Plants" (coauthors S. W. Tagart and C. V. Subramanian),

General Electric Company Report NEDE 24010, July 1977

" Dynamic Analysis Using Modal Synthesis," Journal of the Power Division, ASCE, PO2, pp.131-140, April 1978 O,

970,587 101584

Resume 3 of 8 SARGENT& LUNDY Anand K. Sangh O

Pihlications, Continued " Response Analysis Using Dynamic Influence Coefficients" (coauthors T. P. Khatua. N. A. Holmes and S. L. Chu),

Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Electronic Computation, American Society of Civil Engineers, St. Louis, Missouri, August 1979

" Structural Building Response Review" (coauthors T. I. Hsu and T. P. Khatua), NUREG/CR 1423, Vol. II, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., May 1980

" Prevention and Control of Vibrations" (coauthor D. E. Olson),

presented at the General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1980

" Vibration in Power Plant Structures and Piping"(coauthor D. E. Olson), Proceedings of the American Power Conference, Chicago, Illinois, April 1980

" Soil Structure Interaction Using Substructures"(coauthors T.1. Hsu and N. A. Holmes), Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference, Civil Engineering and Nuclear Power, O Knoxville, Tennessee, September 1980

" Evaluation of Soil Structure Interaction Methods"(coauthors T. I. Hsu, T. P. Khatua and S. L. Chu), presented at the second ASCE Engineering Mechanics Division Specialty Conference on Dynamic Response of Structures, Atlanta, Georgia, January 1981

" Seismic Analysis - Changing Considerations," Proceedings of the American Power Conf erence, Chicago, Illinois, April 1981 "An Integrated and Interactive Piping Analysis and Design Inf ormation System" (coauthor C. A. Podczerwinski),

Proceedings of the General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1982 "Modeling Considerations for Pool Dynamic Analysis" (coauthor D. C. Gupta), presented at the International Workshop on Soil Structure Interaction: Practical Solutions for Static and Dynamic Loading, Rurkee, India, October 10-14, 1983 O 970,587 101584

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 4 of 8 Anand K. Singh O

Publications, Continued "Use of Sampling in Nuclear Power Plant Applications" (coauthors M. Amin and P. Y. Wang), presented at the ASCE Speciality Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Berkeley, California, January 11-13, 1984

" Factors Controlling Strength of Structures, and Anticipated Overstrength for Seismic Load Conditions," presented at the EPRI/NRC Workshop on Nuclear Power Plant Reevaluation for Earthquakes Larger than SSE, San Francisco, California, October 14-17, 1984 O

O 970,587 101584

SARGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 5 of 8 Anand K. Singh V

Power Plant Desian Proiects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Clinton 1 Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power Seismic analysis; 1975 to present Company piping analysis; SRV-LOCA load analysis; seismic risk analysis; cable tray supports design; seismic reevaluation Byron 1,2/ Nuclear 1175 1985/1986/ Commonwealth Seismic analysis; 1974 to present Braidwood 1,2 (each) 1986/1987 Edison Company turbine missile risk; piping analysis shear and block wa!! design; HVAC duct qualifica-tion; cable support design; seismic re-evaluation; pipe whip analysis South 1,2 Coal 500 1986/1987 The Israel Electric Fan foundation design 1984

[] (each) Corporation, Ltd.

(V) Seismic design criteria 1982 Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 Suspendeu Public Service Seismic analysis; cable 1979 to 1983 (each) Indiana tray supports; HVAC duct qualification; reactor shield design; expansion anchor criteria Zimmer i Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Seismic analysis; 1973 to 1983 Gas & Electric piping analysis; Company SRV-LOCA load analysis; HVAC duct qualification; cable support design; SRSS load combination study; seismic re-evaluation La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1122 1982/1984 Commonwealth Seismic analysis; SRV/ 1972 to 1982 (each) Edison Company LOCA analysis; piping analysis; shear and block walls; cable support design; SRSS load combination; seismic reevaluation; ,

pipe whip analysis Lignite 707 1986 Southwestern Fan foundation design 1982 Dolet Hills !

Electric Power Company / Central Louisiana Electric Campany

/q }

\

V:

970,587 10158'4

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 6 of 8 Anand K. Singh e

Power Plant Design Projests, Continued Rated Assignment Gross Operating MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Station - Unit Fuel Middle South Seismic design criteria; 1980,1982 B-2 Coal 750 1997 (held) Services,Inc. fan foundation design The Detroit Edison Seismic reevaluation 1931 Enrico Fermi 2 Nuclear 1123 1983 Company 1985 Southwestern Far foundatior, design 1930 H. W. Pirkey 1 Lignite 707 Electric Power ,

Company Wisconsin Pubhc Fan foundation design 1978 Weston 3 Coal 321 1981 Service Corporation The Goodyear Tire & Fan foundation design 1978 Lawton Tire Coal & N.A. 1979 Oil Rubber Company Wisconsin Electric Fan foundation design 1978 Pleasant Coal 570 1980 Prairie 1 Power Company General Electric Seismic analysis; SRV/ 1976,1977 GEX-Kaiseraugst Nuclear 932 Deferred Company LOCA analysis The Israel Electric Fan foundation design 1976 MD l-4 Coal & 394 1981-1984 Oil (each) Corporation, Ltd.

Power Plant Betterment Projects Rated Assignment Gross MW Client Assignment. Date(s)

Station - Unit Fg Commonwealth Seismic SEP review; 1975 to 1982 Dresden 2,3 Nuclear 850 (each) Edison Company compressor vibration; tornado missile risk; Mark I torus modifi-cations; piping analysis Fan vibrations; 1911,1952 Colhns 4,5 Oil & 504 Commonwealth Coal (each) Edison Company turbine vibrations Fan vibrations 1951 Coleto Creek 1 Coal / Lignite 570 Centra 1 Power and Light Company Tennessee Valley Fan foundation design 1931 Colbert 3 Coal 350 Authority Seismic ultimate capa- 1950,1931 Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1085 Commonwealth (each) Edison Company city; turbine missile risk Seismic review; Mark I 1975,1979 Quad Cities 1,2 Nuclear 850 Commonwealth (each) Edison Company torus modification 970,587 101584

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 7 af 3 Anand K. Singh p)

%J Power Plant Betterment Projects, Continued Rated Gross *-

_ r.t Station - Unit Fuel MW Client _ Assignment Date(s)

Dresden 1 Nuclear 200 Commonwealth Seismic reevaluation; 1977 Edison Company tornado missile analysis Ghent 2 Coal 511 Kentucky Utilities Fan duct vibration 1977 Blend Company Michigan City Coal N.A. Northern Indiana Fan vibration 1976 Public Service Company Newton i Coal 567 Central Illinois Fan foundation design 1975 Public Service Company Computer Program Development Experience

/ ^^*; _;,; .^

Program Program Description Assignment Date(s)

\

(')

^( SMLBOR Small bore piping and support design and Development of an interactive program system to automate all aspects of 1983 to present draf ting system small bore piping and support design and draf ting activities SE15 HANG Analysis, design and Development of interactive program to 1976 to present draf ting of cable tray design and draft supports for cable and HVAC duct supports trays and HVAC ducts PIPSYS Integrated piping Development of the analysis system; 1972 to present analysis system upgrading analysis capabilities to meet changing requirements; addition of interactive front and back end pro-cessors to increase productivity HANCAD Large bore piping sup- Development of an interactive program 1984 port design and draf t- system to automate all aspects of large ing system bore piping support design and draf ting activities PIPOPT Pipe support optimiza- Development of an optimization program 1984 tion program system to minimize the number of snubbers and spring hangers required to support a piping system DYNA 5 Dynamic analysis of Development of frequency domain analysis 1980 structures for soil structure interaction analysis using soil impedance f unctions DINFU Dynamic soil impedance Soil impedance f unctions f or layered 1980 functions soil media using integral equation formulation (p) v 970,587 101584

Selected Experience Record 8 of 8 I SARGENTS LUNDY Anand K. Singh O

Computer Program Development Experience, Continued Assignment Program Program Description Assignment Date(s)

FLUSH Finite element soil Incorporate 3D structural modelin $51 1979 structure interaction model using substructure formulation analysis FAST Frequency domain Development of program capabilities for 1976 to 1979 analysis of axisymmetric efficient analysis of containment structures structures for SRV/LOCA pool dynamic loads using the dynamic influence coefficient approach NONLIN2 Nonlinear analysis of Development of curved pipe element, gap 1974 2D piping and structures element, and program validation -

O O

970,587 101584

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Robert 3. Small

/%

N v

Title Associate and Head Structural Project Engineering Division Education Purdue University - M.S.C.E. - 1964 Purdue University - B.S.C.E. - 1963 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Indiana Israel Louisiana Ohio Oklahoma Wisconsin Structural Engineer - Illinois Appointed Associate - 1973 Responsibilities Mr. Small directs the work of the senior structural project engineers and structural project engineers. His group is responsible for assuring that structural design conforms to ap,'licable client, industry, and Sargent & Lundy standards and procedures. His group participates in major decisions concerning the plant design and construction in consultation n with the client and other project-related disciplines. The h major areas of project involvement include siting, site development, all civil and structural work, and architectural treatment.

Experience Mr. Small has 20 years of experience in structural engineering and design of nuclear and fossil power plants. At increasing levels of responsibility, he has supervised the preparation of project design criteria, specifications, project criteria, and drawings. He also has analyzed and designed the sub- and superstructures and auxiliary components of major generating plants. Mr. Small joined Sargent & Lundy in 1964.

Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers Chairman - Task Committee on Turbine Foundations - Energy Division American Concrete Institute Publications " Low-Tuned Turbine Generator Foundations"

" Post-Tensioned Concrete Nuclear Structures"(Coauthor)

"Effect of Earthquake Criteria on Nuclear Plant Design" (Coauthor)

A 970,596 i 101184

i tiARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Robert 3. Small 9

Publications, Continued " Seismic Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Structures" (Coauthor)

" Current Considerations in the Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Station Equipment" (Coauthor) 1

\

O O

970,596 101184

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Robert 3. Small G

kxs )

Power Plant Desian Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MT Date(s) Client _ Assignment Date(s)

Schahier 17,18 Coal & 393 1983/1986 Northern Indiana Senior Structural 1977 to 1931 Oil (each) Public Service Project Engineer Company Edgewater 5 Coal 380 1985 Wisconsin Power and Senior Structural 1977 to 1981 Light Company Project Engineer Bailly N1 Nuclear 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Senior Structural 1977 to 1931 Public Service Project Engineer Company Weston 3 Coal 321 1981 Wisconsin Public Senior Structural 1974 to 1978 Service Company Project Engineer NP.I Nuclear 900 Cancelled The Israel Electric Senior Structural 1975 to 1977 Corporation, Ltd. Project Engineer Pleasant Coal 570 1980/1985 Wisconsin Electric Senior Structural 1974 to 1977 Prairie 1,2 (each) Company Project Engineer

.v) 4 v

970,596 10118t4

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 2 n Michael 3. Spisak Title Senior Component Engineer, Environmental Qualification Group Component Qualification Division Education Purdue University - B.S.E.E. - 1975 Purdue University - A.A.S. Supervision - 1974 Purdue University - A.A.S. Electrical Engineering Technology -

1973 Responsibilities Mr. Spisak performs analyses for components and structures and provides technical support and training to engineering analysts. This includes writing and review of environmental requirements for components, evaluation of vendor proposals for components, review of environmental qualification reports, witnessing actual testing, preparing progress reports and meeting notes, and providing engineermg analysis for input to the Surveillance and Maintenance Program.

Experience Mr. Spisak currently performs the equipment qualification program for harsh, mild, and mechanical equipment at a

\ nuclear power station consisting of two ll75-MW units. In addition, Mr. Spisak is actively involved in the ongoing in-house qualification efforts of various FWR and BWR stations.

He spent six years in the Electrical Project Engineering Division before joining the Component Qualification Division.

His experience included system responsibility for both BOP and NSSS activities with other disciplines. Assignments include six nuclear power plant projects and TMI and retrofit modifications for another nuclear plant consisting of two 1130-MW units.

During an 8-month absence from S&L, Mr. Spisak was assigned as a lead engineer with electrical responsibilities involving nuclear retrofit work and emergency off-site facilities construction. He rejoined Sargent & Lundy in 1982.

O 970,605 122383

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 2 of 2 Michael 3. Spisak O

Rated Gross Operating Station - Unit Fuel MW _Date(s) Client Assignment La Salle 1,2 Nuclear  !!22 1982/1984 Commonwealth Edison Senior Component Engineer (each) Company (Component Qualification)

Dresden 2,3 Nuclear 850 1971 Commonwealth Edison Electrical Engineer (each) Company Quad Cities 1,2 Nuclear 850 1972 Commonwealth Edison Electrical Engineer (each) Company Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1085 1973/1974 Commonwealth Edison Electrical Engineer (each) Company Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1175 1984/1985 Commonwealth Edison Electrical Engineer (each) Company Braidwood 1,2 Nuclear 1175 1985/1986 Commonwealth Edison Electrical Engineer (each) Company Bailly NI Nuclear 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Public Electrical Engineer Service Company Clinton i Nuclear 985 1986 tilinois Power Company Design Engineer O

O 970,605 122383

1 gggggNT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 2 Robert M. Tiernlund D

(V Title Project Engineer Component Qualification Division Education University of Illinois (Urbana) - B.S. Engineering Mechanics -

1975 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Responsibilities Mr. Tjernlund is responsible for demonstrating the adequacy of all of the safety-related equipment used in nuclear power generating stations to perform their safety-related functions in the event of a seismic occurrence or accident. He supervises a project team staff in the Component Qualification Division in the preparation and review of equipment and design procurement specifications, performance of bid evaluations, calculation of loads required for design of equipment foundations and building floor slabs, preparation and review of equipment dynamic qualification reports, preparation and review of ASME certified design reports, preparation and review of NRC licensing documents, and in the design and analysis of mechanical piping penetration assemblies.

Experience Mr. Tjernlund has nine years of nuclear experience in the design ar.d analysis of mechanical piping penetration assemblies and seven years of nuclear experience in qualifying equipment for postulated seismic and accident events. He has experience in Fortran IV programming, including program development and maintenance, component stress analysis, finite element modal analysis, dynamic testing techniques used for seismic qualification of equipment, impedance testing techniques used for determining the dynamic characteristics of equipment, and fatigue analysis. In addition, he is familiar with several codes and standards, including ASME B&PV Code Sections Ill and XI; AISC Steel Construction Manual; AWS standards;IEEE-323,344; and NRC regulatory guides. Mr.

l Tjernlund joined Sargent & Lundy in 1975.

Membership American Society of Mechanical Engineers l

l l

l f 970,638

031984 l

l l

L

&lected Experience Record 2 of 2 SARGENT S LUNDY Robert M. Tjernlund O

Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s) 985 1986 Illinois Power Project Engineer 1984 to present Clinton 1 Company (equipment qualification) 839 Cancelled The Cincinnati Gas & Project Engineer 1979 to 198t*

Zimmer 1 Electric Company (equipment quali.

fication)

Carroll County 1175 2000/2001 Commonwealth Edison Project Engineer 1977 to 1979 1,2 (each) Company (equipment quali-fication) 985 1986 tilinois Power Engineering Analyst 1976 to 1979 Clinton 1 Company (penetration design and analysis)

La Salle 1,2  !!22 1982/198f6 Commonwealth Edison Engineering Analyst 1975 to 1976 (each) Company (penetration design and analysis)

O 970,638 031984

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Paul L. Wattelet O

4 Title Partner and Project Director Education Purdue University - Ph.D. Nuclear Engineering - 1%6 Illinois Institute of Technology - B.S. Physics - 1962 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Illinois Indiana Kansas Michigan New York Admitted to Partnership - 1982 ,

Appointed Associate - 1981 Responsibilities As a project director, Dr. Wattelet is responsible for the

, implementation of the work and the technicalintegrity of the project during its execution. In the course of discharging these responsibilities, Dr. Wattelet directs project teams staffed by l project managers, project engineers, and other technical i

personnel. Dr. Wattelet consults with the clients and project teams in planning and scheduling the project, and developing ,

the appropriate cost control systems. He leads the I development of and monitors project management documents i

such as engineering and construction schedules, man-hour estimates, project cost estimates, and scope of work.

Dr. Wattelet regularly reports to the client regarding performance on the project and the status of engineering and construction. He works jointly with the client and project team on setting design parameters and operating philosophies which have significant engineering and economic implications. Dr. Wattelet directs the appropriate application of the Sargent & Lundy engineering policies and philosophies and maintains surveillance of the design to ensure their l implementation throughout the project.

Experience Dr. Wattelet has over 17 years of experience in the engineering and design of major nuclear steam-electric generating stations, including the design of nuclear steam supply systems. At Sargent & Lundy he has been involved with t balance-of-plant designs for large central generating station l projects and also with backfit and betterment engineering

, services for several nuclear units.

Dr. Wattelet was a mechanical project engineer, project manager, and project director for a two-unit 2250-MW pressurized water reactor project. In these positions, he i

controlled Sargent & Lundy's project engineering man-hour j

expenditures by regularly monitoring expended man-hours versus projected man-hour estimates. He coordinated the 970,679 102484

- - - - - - - ~ - . - , - , - - - - --_ - _ -__ - - -.. _ - - . - .- - --

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Paul L. Wattelet O

Experience, Continued development of engineering documents such as design criteria, specifications, licensing documents, schematic and working drawings, bid evaluations, and design instructions. On major purchases, he worked with the client and vendors to select equipment best suited for specialized plant operating duty.

Dr. Wattelet was also responsible for conformance of mechanical project work to applicable Sargent & Lundy standards and procedures. These included preliminary design studies to determine general plant layout, sizing, specification of equipment, analysis of economic factors, preparation of flow diagrams, and sizing and flexibility analysis of piping and support systems.

He has also been supervisor of Safeguards Systems Analysis in Sargent & Lundy's Nuclear Safeguards and Licensing Division responsible for methods development and analysis of nuclear safeguards systems.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1972, Dr. Wattelet was a Senior Engmeer for plant safety analysis in the Advanced Reactor Division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation. He developed methods for analyzing accidents in Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors (LMFBR) and performed safety analyses on the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). He organized and participated in regulatory proceedings for FFTF and interfaced with the AEC/RDT, who provided the funding for the LMFBR projects he worked on. Before this, Dr. Wattelet was an engineer at NASA where he participated in core design of the tungsten-water moderated rocket reactor.

Memberships American Nuclear Society Society of Sigma Xi Western Society of Engineers hablications "Two Years After TMl"(coauthored), Midwest Engineer, publication of Western Society of Engineers, September 1981 "TMI-2 Plus Two"(coauthored), Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1981

" Multi-Cell Analysis of High-Energy Fluid Line Breaks,"

American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, San Francisco, California,1973 "FFTF Barriers to Fuel Failure Propagation," American Nuclear Society Summer Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts,1971 O

970,679 102484

SARGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Paul L. Wattelet

\

t Power Plant Desisp Projects Rated Cross Operating Station - Unit Fuel _MW_ Date(s) Client P -tr T.=t  %(s)

Date -

Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 - Suspended Public Service Project Director 1982 to present (each) Indiana Project Manager 1978 to 1982 Mechanical Project 1973 to 1978 Engineer

(

I I

l l

970,679

. 102484

. ~ . . . . - - - - -. , . - - , - , . - - , - . , ,,,n.. . - , - - - - . , . . , - - - - - - - , - . - - - - - - . - . _ , . , , , - - - . - - - - - . - . - - - . - _ . - - _ . - - - . -.-

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Donald P. White 1 73

\

Title Project Maneger Education University of Illinois - B.S.C.E. - 1958 lowa State University - M.S./ Nuclear Engineering - 1961 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Illinois Oregon Pennsylvania Washington Responsibilities As project manager, Mr. White is responsible for the plan-ning, coordination, and performance monitoring of Sary,ent &

Lundy's work on the project. He leads the project engmeering staff in the preparation of schedules, the project cost estimate, and the project scope of work. Mr. White controls Sargent & Lundy's project engineering man-hour expenditures by regularly monitoring expended man-hours versus projected man-hour estimates. He advises the client regarding the project's status in the monthly reports during review meetings and in his day-to-day communications with the client. He coordinates the development of documents such as design criteria, specifications, licensing documents, schematic and h; working drawings, bid evaluations, and design instructions. On V major purchases, Mr. White works with the client and vendors to select equipment best suited for specialized plant operating duty. By virtue of his position, he has the authority to call upon the resources of the firm to meet the demands of the project.

Experience Mr. White has a long and distinguished career record in the engineering and design of nuclear power stations. Before rejoining Sargent & Lundy this year, he served for 15 years as a nuclear engineer, at increasing levels of responsibility, for another large AE serving the power industry. His most recent position there was as Manager of Engineering, directing the technical performance of all engineering and draf ting personnel assigned to the firm's West Coast office (approximately 100 engineers). Prior to this position, he was Manager of the Nuclear Section of the Mechanical Engineering Department. He was responsible for the administration of a large group of mechanical engineers and development and mamtenance of design guides, guide specifications, and department procedures. He also provided liaison with clients, prepared estimates and proposals, and consulted and advised the Advanced Engineering Group on all aspects of mechanical design. His project engineering experience with that firm iA) v 972,850 121084

SARGENTS LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Donald P. White O

Experience, Continued

~ ~

included work on three nuclear station design projects. One of these projects included HTGR and LWR reactor technologies.

Another of these stations was a two 1200-MW unit BWR de-sign. His prior project engineering experience with Sargent &

Lundy included work for two nuclear station design projects; a two 1100-MW unit PWR station and a 330-MW HTGR unit.

Mr. White also directed S&L's efforts on feasibility studies for liquid metal fast breeder reactor power plants.

O l

l l

O l 972,850 121084

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Donald P. White Power Plant Desean Projects Rated Gross Operating ^^^'..-..t Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Perry 1,2* Nuclear 1200 1983/1988 The Cleveland Senior Project 1972 to 1973 (each) Electric Engineer

!!!uminating Company Takahamn 1* Nuclear 826 1973 Kansal Electric Project Engineer 1969 to 1972 Power Company, Japan Fort St. Vrain Nuclear 330 1979 Public Service Nuclear Project 1966 Colorado Engineer Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1100 - Commonwealth Nuclear Project 1967 to 1969 (each) Edison Company Engineer

• Projects performed with Gilbert / Commonwealth, s

(

972,850 121084

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 4 3,, g, wisniewski O

V Title Supervisor, Power Station Studies Electrical Analytical Division Education Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.E.E. - 1972 tilinois Institute of Technology - B.S.E.E. - 1971 Responsibilities Mr. Wisniewski supervises and is responsible for the performance of power plant design studies and other analytical work related to the evaluation of power plant designs, performance, and operation. His responsibilities also cover power system planning in the areas of generation expansion studies, power system analysis, and power system reliability.

Mr. Wisniewski provides technical supervision to the electrical analysts and engineers conducting power plant design work and system planning studies assigned to the division.

Experience Mr. Wisniewski has worked on numerous power plant auxiliary system design studies involving short circuit, voltage regulation, motor starting analysis. His work has included the selection and setting of protective relays for a number of major generating units, substations, and transmission lines and

\_ the design of grounding, lightning protection, and cathodic protection systems. He also has worked on a number of system studies in the area of generation expansion planning, transmission system load flow and transient stability analysis, and power system reliability. Mr. Wisniewski joined Sargent &

Lundy in 1971.

Publication " Metal-oxide Arresters - Their Characteristics and Application in Power Systems," Transmission & Substation Conference, Chicago, Illinois, November 1980 A

970,699 060784

SARGENT & LUNDy Selected Experience Record 2 of 4 Jan B. Wisniewski O

Power Plant Betterment Projects and Studies Assignment Type of Prom Station Client Date(s)

Analysis of auxiliary North Anna Virginia Electric 1953 electrical system and Surry and Power Company System expansion study South Texas Electric 1932 Cooperative Protective relay settings Clinton Illinois Power Company 1932 Single line design Six Standard Niiddle South Services, 1981 Coal / Lignite Inc.

Units Load shedding and transient Aramco 1931 stability study Generation expansion study Interstate Power Company 1931 Performance evaluation Apache Arizona Electric Power 1933 of the electrical Cooperative auxiliary system Protective relay settings Lakeside Reserve Niining Company 1953 Analysis of ground lead +2M kV DC Center Niinnkota Power 1933 corrosion and transmission to Deluth Trans- Cooperative, Inc.

tower grounding mission Wire Balanced draf t conversion Colbert Tennessee Valley 1979 auxiliary power study Authority Protective relay settings Pleasant Prairie Wisconsin Electric Power 1979 Company Coat vs. nuclear generation Wisconsin Power and Light 1975 expansion study Company Site evaluation study - Louisa lowa-Illinois Gas and 1976 unit size and fuel Electric Company consideration Investigation of the economic Wisconsin Power and Light 1974 elfects of participation in Company jointly owned nuclear power plants Design of auxiliary system United States Atomic 1974 for the ORNI AK experiment Energy Commission High power system voltage Oklahoma Gas and 1973 study Electric Company Generating capacity addition Iowa-Illinois Gas and 1973 study Electric Company 9

970,699 060784

• • d Experience Record 3 cf 4 SARGENTS LUNDY Jan B. Wasniewskt

<[Ni

( /

v Power Plant Bettermen1 Projects and Studies, Continued .

Assignment Type of Project Station Client Date(s)

Electrical power distribu- United States Atomic 1973 tion and power drive systems Energy Commission for an add-on gaseous diffusion plant Comparison of alternatives Wisconsin Power and Light 1973 to nuclear plant Company participation Generation expansion study Interstate Power 1973 Company Electrical switchyard modif - United States Atomic 1972 cations for conceptual design Energy Commission of cascada uprating program Motor drive and electrical United States Atomic 1972 distribution system for Energy Commission a gaseous ditfusion plant O

(  ! Power Plant Design Projects v

Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fg MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Schahler 17,18 Coal & 393 1983/1986 Northern Indiana Supervisor (pow er 1979 to present Oil (each) Public Service station design Company studies)

Byron 1,2/ Nuclear  !!75 1985/1986: Commonwealth Supervisor (power 1973 to present Braidwood 1,2 (each) 1986/1987 Edison Company station design studies)

Nuclear tilinois Power Supervisor (power 1973 to present Clinton i 985 1986 Company station design studies)

La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1122 1982/198t* Commonwealth Supervisor (power 1972 to 1983 (each) Edison Company station design studies)

Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear 1875 Suspended Public Service Supervisor (power 1973 to 1983 (each) Indiana station design studies)

Gibson 1-5 Coal 618 1975-1982 Public Service Electrical Analyst 1972 to 1981 (each) Indiana Coal, 311 1982 Central Louisiana Supervisor (power 1975 to 1980

( Rodemacher 2

! Lignite, Electric Company, station design

' Gas, & Oil Inc. studies) fG i

\

l v]

970,699 060784 u

o Selected Experience Record 4 cf 4 SARGENT& LUNDY 3an B. Wisniewski O

Power Plant Design Proicle s, Continued Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Welsh 2,5 Coal 512 1989/19S2 Southwestern Supervisor (power 1974 to 1983 (each) Electric Power station design Company stud 6es)

Ghent I-4 Coal 511 1974-1984 Kentucky Utilities Electrical Analyst 1970 to 1913 (each) Company Picasant Coal 570 1950 4:sconsin Electric Electrical Analyst 1974 to 1978 Prairie ! Power Company Coleto Creek 1 Coal & 570 1913 Central Power and Electrical Analyst 1974 to 1978 Lignite 1.ight Company Powerton 3,6 Coal 828 1972/1975 Commonwealth Electrical Analyst 1971 to 1974 (each) Edison Company Baldwin 3 Coal 535 1975 lilinois Power Electrical Analyst 1970 to 1974 Company O

970,699 O

060784 t

SARGENT5 LUNDY Resume 1 of 5

^

f Osama Zaben Title Associate and Senior Structural Project Engineer

^

Education Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.C.E. - 1972 University of Illinois - B.S.C.E. - 1968 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Illinois Indiana Kansas New York Wisconsin Structural Engineer - Illinois Appointed Associate - 1982 Responsildlities As a senior structural project engineer, Mr. Zaben supervises the structural project engineers. Mr. Zaben is responsible for seeing that structural design conforms to applicable client, l~n dustry, and Sargent & Lundy standards and procedures. He i

participates in major decisions concerning the plant design and construction in concert with the client and other project-related disciplines. The major areas of his project involvement include siting, site development, all civil and structural work, O and architectural treatment. He reviews and approves the basic plant design criteria and any unique structural engineering design concepts. He authorizes Sargent & Lundy drawings for construction by his signature and seal. Mr. Zaben reviews structural engineering and construction schedules and the project scope of work. Mr. Zaben coordinates the structural activities in the preparation of monthly project engineering and construction reports. Mr. Zaben coordinates preparation of specifications for equipment, materials, and labor packages. He evaluates proposals and makes purchase recommendations.

Eryerience Mr. Zaben has extensive experience in the civil, structural, and architectural engineering and design of fossil and nuclear '.

power plants. As a structural project engineer, he has been in charge of six power plant projects and seven power plant modifications, studies, and sitework. Prior to that, he worked  ;

on seven coal, one coal and oil, and three nuclear sta+1ons at increasing levels of responsibility. He is a member of Sargent & Lundy's Reference Design Plant Committee and Structural Standards Review Committee.

Throughout his 15-year power plaat career, Mr. Zaben has designed or supervised the design of power plant structures; site selection and site layout, including road and railroad layout; water intake and discharge structures; coal unloading facilities; disposal dike facilities for fly ash, bottom ash, and 970,717 101184

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 2 of 5 ,

osama Zaben O I Experience, Continued flue gas desulfurization byproducts; and design of chimneys and chimney liners, coal silos, coal bunkers, and wastewater treatment structures.

As an assistant chief structural design engineer, he was involved in one nuclear unit and five fossil units. He reviewed project work with the supervisors for conformance with codes and criteria, and he assisted them in solving special problems.

He monitored project progress and manpower requirements, developed design standards, and gave lectures on the structural design of power plants to new engineers.

As a supervising design engineer, Mr. Zaben coordinated the structural work on a nuclear project. He collected, reviewed, and disseminated information to his assigned engineers. He developed project design criteria and procedures and guided engineers in their design work. As a structural engineer, he was involved in the design of fossil and nuclear power plant structures.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1970, Mr. Zaben worked as a designer of highway bridges and as a designer of power plants and precipitator support structures.

Membership American Society of Civil Engineers O

970,717 101184

W Eiperience Record 3 CI 5 SARGENT& LUNDY Osama Zaben

\

(V Power Plant Desasp Proiects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client P t_- a..t Date(s)

Pleasant Coal 370 1985 Wisconsin Electric Senior Structural 1982 to present Prairie 2 Power Company Project Engineer Reference Plant Coal 600-700 - Sargent & Lundy Senior Structural 1979 .present Project Engineer Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 Suspended Public Service Senior Structural 1979 to 1983 (each) Indiana Project Engineer MTA Fossil Plant Coal. 697 1996 New York Power Senior Structural .1982 to 1983 Oil, & (held) Authority Project Engineer Refuse Gibson S Coal 618 1982 Public Service Senior Structural 1982 Indiana Project Engineer (includes coal unloading)

Weston 3 Coal 321 1981 Wisconsin Public Structural Project 1977 to 1982 Service Corporation Engineer

(' Braidwood 1,2 Nuclear 1875 (each) 1986/1987 Commonwealth Edison Company Senior Structural Project Engineer 1979 to 1981 Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1173 1983/1986 Commonwealth Senior Structural 1979 to 1981 (each) Edison Company Project Engineer

. Lawton Tire 1,2 Coal & NA 1979 The Goodyear Structural Project 1977 to 1979 Oil Tire & Rubber Engineer (process Company steam)

Havana 6 Coal 439 1978  !!!inois Power Assistant Chief 1975 to 1977 Company Structural Engineer East Bend 2 Coal 648 1981 The Cincinnati Assistant Chief 1975 to 1977 Gas & Electric Structural Engineer Company Coleto Creek 1 Coal 570 1980 Central Power and Assistant Chief 1974 to 1977 Light Company Structural Engineer Zimmer 1 Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Assistant Chief 1974 to 1977 Gas & Electric Structural Engineer Company Lansing 4 Coal 252 1977 Interstate Power Assistant Chief 1974 to 1976 Company Structural Engineer Miami Fort 8 Coal 512 1978 The Cincinnati Assistant Chief 1973 Gas & Electric Structural Engineer Company Clinton 1 Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power Supervising Structural 1973 to 1974 Company Engineer p_

(v) 970,717 101184

Selected Experienc2 Record 4 ef 5 SARGENT S LUNDY osama Zaben O

Powe Plant Design Proiects, Continued Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Ghent ! Coal 511 1974 Kentucky Utilities Structural Engineer 1970 to 1973 Company Bailly NI Nuclear 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana 5tructural Engineer 1972 Public Service Company Power Plant Betterment Projects Rated Gross Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assignment Date(s)

Cayuga1,2 Coal 531 Public Service Senior Structural 1982 to present (each) Indiana Project Engineer (chimney steel liner examinations)

Fort St. Vrain i Nuclear 330 Public Service Senior Structural 1979 to present Company of Colorado Project Engineer (miscellaneous modifications)

Grand Tower 3,4 Coal 60/100 Central Illinois Senior Structural 1984 Public Service Project Engineer Company (modifications to levee and to crib house)

Surry 1,2 Nuclear 775 Virginia Electric Senior Structural 1983 (each) and Power Company Project Engineer (miscellaneous modifications)

North Anna 1,2 Nuclear 1755 Virginia Electric Senior Structural 1983 (total) and Power Company Project Engineer (miscellaneous modifications)

Newton 1,2 Coal 567 Central Illinois Senior Structural 1983 (each) Public Service Project Engineer Company (chimney, liners, and coatings examination)

Coffeen 1,2 Coal 938 CentralIllinois Senior Structural 1983 (total) Public Service Project Engineer Company (examination of repair of silos) 970,717 O

101184

l i

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 5 of 5 osama Zaben n

Power Plant Betterment Projects, Continued Rated Gross Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Client Assignment Date(s)

Various Fossil & - Virginia Electric Senior Structural 1983 Nuclear and Power Company Project Engineer (conceptual studies for iossil and nuclear plants)

Wabash River 1-6 Coal 886 Public Service Senior Structural 1982 to 1983 (total) Indiana Project Engineer (ash pond extension)

Senior Structural 1982 to 1983 Project Engineer (ductwork and chimney)

Muskogee Coal 572 Oklahoma Gas and Senior Structural 1982 to 1983 Electric Company Project Engineer (evaluation of pre-cipitator support steel)

Sooner Coal N.A. Oklahoma Gas and Senior Structural 1982 to 1983 c\ Electric Company Project Engineer

[ (evaluation of pre-

\" cipitator support steel)

Wolf Creek i Nuclear  !!00 Kansas Gas and Senior Structural 1982 Electric Company Project En (site work)gineer R. A. Gallagher Coal 150 Public Service Senior Structural 1982 1-4 (each) Indiana Project Engineer (chimney repairs)

Sequoyah 1,2 Nuclear 1128 Tennessee Valley Senior Structural 1980 (each) Authority Project Engineer (containment venting conceptual design)

Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1085 Commonwealth Edison Senior Streural 1979 to 1980 (each) Company Project Engineer (miscClaneous modifications)

O

'V) 970,717 101184

SARGENT & LUNDY vill-2 REVISION 1

. 4/5/85 B. Internal Review Committee O

O

. . . .- _ _ ___ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _J

Resume 1 of 3 SARGENT & LUNDY Ernest B. Branch a

Title Associate and Mechanical Design Director Education Virginia Polytechnic Institute - B.S. Engineering Mechanics -

1964 Registration Professional Engineer - Illinois Appointed Associate - 1973 Responsibilities Mr. Branch is the mechanical design director with responsibility for the Engineering Mechanics Division and the Mechanical Design and Drafting Division. He is responsible for the integration and coordination of the divisions' output with that of other divisions and departments. He assigns areas of responsibility to each division and ensures that the divi'sions perform all assigned work within budget, within schedule, and with an acceptable level of quality. He performs other functions and tasks as required by the assistant department manager or the department manager.

fq Experience Mr. Branch has extensive experience in the stress analysis of

_Q piping systems and mechanical equipment for power plants.

Before assuming his position as mechanical design director, he was the head of Sargent & Lundy's Engineering Mechanics Division. In this capacity, Mr. Branch directed a group of systems analysts, component analysts, and computer specialists. The division's scope of work involved stress analysis of the piping systems and associated mechanical equipment for major steam-electric generating stations, both nuclear- and fossil-fueled. The division has been responsible for evaluating the seismic qualifications of the safety-related mechanical and electrical equipment used in nuclear plants and provided the piping and equipment criteria used in Safety Analysis Reports. The division also has done design and analysis for penetration assemblies and performed hydraulic and thermal transient analyses for piping and mechanical equipment.

Before joining Sargent & Lundy in 1969, Mr. Branch did stress analysis of piping systems for naval nuclear power plants. He determined the specification requirements for the purchase of piping, fittings, and valves, and qualified certain

.. pieces of equipment for shock analysis and testing.

,7 L) 970,059 101534

__ - . a

Resume 2 of 3 SJ RGENT & LUNDY Ernest B. Branch O

Memberships American Society of Mechanical Engineers

- Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code

- Section III Committee

- Section III Subgroup on Design

- Section III Working Group on Piping

- PVRC Technical Committee on Piping Systems Publications " Stress Limits for Class 2 and Class 3 Components Under Upset, Emergency, and Faulted Conditions" (coauthor

3. Gascoyne), ASME Paper No. 76-PVP-61 "The Impact of ASME Section III," Power Magazine, October 1975

" Economic Impact of Seismic Requirements in Nuclear Power Stations," (coauthor R. Small), Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference,1971

" Transient Thermal Gradient Stress," Heating / Piping / Air Conditioning, January 1971 O

O 970,059 O

101534

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 s Ernest B. Branch Nuclear Power Plant Desian Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Zion 1,2 1085 1973/1974 Commonwealth Edison Division Head 1974 to 1981 (each) Company Quad Cities 1,2 850 1972 Commonwealth Edison Division Head 1973 to 1981 (each) Company Marble Hill 1,2 1175 Suspended Public Service Indiana Division Head 1973 to 1981 (each)

Clinton 1,2 985 1986/ Cancelled Illinois Power Company Division Head 1972 to 1981 (each)

Braidwood 1,2 1175 1986/1987 Commonwealth Edison Division Head 1972 to 1981 (each) Company Byron 1,2  !!75 1985/1986 Commonwealth Edison Division Head 1971 to 1981 (each) Company h Dresden 2,3 850 1971 Commonwealth Edison Division Head 1970 to 1981

() (each) Company La Salle 1,2  !!22 1982/1984 Commonwealth Edison Division Head 1970 to 1981 (each) Company Zimmer 1 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Gas & Division Head 1970 to 1981 Electric Company Bailly N-1 684 Cancelled Northern Indiana Division Head 1970 to 1981 Public Service Company Enrico Fermi 2  !!23 1984 The Detroit Edison Division Head 1970 to 1981 Company Carroll County 1175 2000/2001 Commonwealth Edison Division Head 1978 to 1979 1,2 (each) Company Fort St. Vrain 1 330 1979 Public Service Company Division Head 1970 to 1979 of Colorado

/N NN 970,059 101584

Resume g og 3 SARGENTS LUNDY Bryan A.Erler

/

()_/

Title Associate and Structural Design Director Education Purdue University - M.S.C.E. - 1970 Purdue University - B.S.C.E. - 1969 Registration Structural Engir.eer - Illinois Appointed Associate - 1979 Responsibilities Mr. Erler directs the following four Structural Design Divisions, the Structural Engineering Division, the Structural Drafting Division, the Architectural Design Division, and the Structural Engineering Specialist Division. The principal responsibilities for the four divisions include preparation review, and approval of all Structural Engineering calculations for reinforced concrete and steel structures; and preparation, and review of Structural, Civil, and Architectural drawings for all power plant structures. This would include all structural aspects of Sargent & Lundy projects, including foundations, structural steel, reinforced concrete, air and gas duct work, O prestressed concrete, siding, roofing, windows, and interior d architectural work. In order to perform the above primary responsibilities, personnel from these four Divisions participate in many support activities, such as developing General Arrangements, performing design studies, reviewing procurement specifications, and reviewing vendor drawings.

Experience Mr. Erler has been responsible for the design and analysis of all containment vessels in Sargent & Lundy nuclear power plants. He has supervised the design of prestressed and reinforced concrete containments for many plants and has been responsible for seismic analysis of these stations as well. Mr. Erler has also been active in the development of several national standards for the structural design of nuclear power plants. Through his work with professional committees he has been involved in the development of criteria for nuclear l containment design and design for other extreme loads on nuclear plant structures, such as high energy line break effects and seismic excitation. Mr. Erler joined Sargent & Lundy in 1970.

i Memberships American Concrete Institute t

American Society of Civil Engineers Post-Tensioning Institute O

970,166 101284

Resume 2 of 3 SARGENT& LUNDY Bryan A. Erler O

Committees ASME/ACI Joint Technical Committee on Concrete Pressure Vessels for Nuclear Application ACI-348 Structural Safety O

l O

970,166 1012S4

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Bryan A. Erler fN

% )\

Power Plant Danie Projects Rated .

Gross Operating Station - Unit Fuel MW Assignment Date(s) Client Assimment Date(s)

Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear 1175 Suspendeo Public Service Containment Design 1973 to 1975 (each) Indiana and Seismic Analysis Clinton ! Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power Containment Dengn 1972 to 1975 Company and Seism!~ Analysis Braidwood 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 1986/1987 Commonwealth Containment Design 1972 to 1975 (each) Edison Company and Seismic Analysis Byron 1,2 Nuclear 1175 1985/1986 Commonwealth Containmeat Design 1971 to 1975 (each) Edison Company and Seismic. Analysis La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1122 1982/1984 Commonwealth Containme it Design 1971 to 1975 (each) Edison Company and Seismic Analysis Zimmer i Nuclear 839 Suspended t

The Cincinnata Gas & Containmelt Design 1971 to 1975 Electric Company Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1085 1973/1974

[_ (each)

Commonwealth Edison Company Containment Design 1971 to 1973 D.C. Cook I,2 Nuclear  !!26 1975/1978 Indiana & Michigan Auxiliary Building 1970 to 1971 (total) Electric Company Design Reinforced on Concrete O

V 970,166 1012 %

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 2 Richard L. Givan m

i \

\

Title Assistant Division Head Control and Instrumentation Division Education Colorado College - B.S. Mathematics - 1961 Responsibilities Mr. Givan is the Assistant Head of a group of engineers and designers who develop control and instrumentation systems for major nuclear steam-electric generating stations. He assists in the overall manag,ement of the division and ensures that the engineering and design on nuclear projects are in accordance with the client's requirements, company standards, industry standards, government regulations, and Quality Assurance requirements, and that they include the best technology available. He estimates manpower requirements and provides information for the preparation of schedules. He recommends personr.el assignments, assists in interviewing applicants and doing performance evaluations, and consults in salary adminis-

[

tration. He makes recommendations regarding the technical I training of division personnel and in the development and maintenance of division standards, practices, and procedures.

b Experience Mr. Givan has been involved with many projects as Assistant Division Head and supervisor of project engineering. Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1975, he was an instrumentation engineer involved in installation and checkout of instru-mentation systems in a BWR plant, a project engineer with operational control and responsibility for checkout and launch operations of Saturn V booster and ground support systems, a systems engineer engaged in electrical and mechanical systems analysis and development of checkout requirements and operations for spacecraft, and a missile systems engineer involved in electrical and mechanical missile systems operational evaluation and technical assistance to Department of Navy Operational Forces.

Membership Instrument Society of America

- Publication " Controls Miniaturization - How and Why" (coauthor J.P. Faber), General Engineering Conference, March 20-21, 1980

('T V

970,208 032085

Selected Experience Record 2 of 2 SARGENT & LUNDY Richard L. Givan O

Power Plant Design Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Enrico Fermi 2 Nuclear 1123 1985 The Detroit Controls and Instrumenta. 3-77 to present Edison Company tion Supervisor (mis-cellaneous engineering and design work)

Clinton i Nuclear 915 1986 Illinois Power Controls and Instrumenta- 1-76 to present Company tion Supervisor Zimmer i Nuclear 839 Cancelled The Cincinnati Controls and Instrumenta- 3-77 to 1-34 Gas & Electric tion Supervisor Company Marble Hill 3,4 Nuclear  !!75 Cancelled Public Service Controls and Instrumenta- 3-79 to 1-80 (each) Indiana tion Supervisor Bailly NI Nuclear 634 Cancelled Northern Indiana Controls and Instrumenta- 3-77 to 5-75 Public Service tion Supervisor Company GEX-Kaiseraugst Nuclear 932 Deferred General Electric Controls and Instrumenta- 3-77 to 3-75 Company tion Supervisor (pre.

liminary review of pri-mary containment and BOP equipment within contain-ment)

La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1122 1982/1984 Commonwealth Edison Controls and Instrumenta- I-75 to 176 (each) Company tion Engineer Studies Assignment Type of Study Client Assignment Date(s)

Computer System Carolina Power & Controls and Instrumentation 3-83 to 4-83 Implementation Light Company Supervisor 970,208 O

032085

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Leonard R. Stensland Title Associate and Electrical Design Director Electrical Design & Draf ting Division Education Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.E.E. - 1956 Illinois Institute of Technology - B.S.E.E. - 1952 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Arkansas Illinois Indiana Kentucky Louisiana Michigan New York Ohio Texas Wisconsin Appointed Associate - 1969 Responsibilities Mr. Stensland develops and monitors the effectiveness of procedures fm the efficient flow of design information from the Electrical Project Engineering Division and other departments to the Electrical Design and Draf ting Division in order to enhance the quality of the work and minimize the man-hours needed to perform it. He also develops and monitors the effectiveness of the Electrical Draf ting Standards and the Drafting and Field Standards. Mr. Stensland is responsible for establishing and monitoring Electrical Design and Draf ting offices at power plant sites; recommending hirings, promotions, transfers, terminations, and salary adjustments for the individuals at those offices; and approving expense accounts. He is responsible for negotiating, preparing, and maintaining contracts for contract personnel for Electrical Design and Draf ting, for both main office assignments and power plant site assignments. In addition, he supervises the work of the Electrical Department Computer Applications Coordinator, including investigation of methods of utilizing new technology to reduce the man-hours for Electrical Department work (computers, computer-aided draf ting, microfiche, aperture cards, etc.).

Experience Mr. Stensland has 30 years of experience in the electrical engineering and design of major steam-electric generating stations, both nuclear- and fossil-fueled, and associated substations. He has held numerous responsible positions at Sargent & Lundy, including head of the Electrical Project Engineering Division and head of the Electrical Design and Draf ting Division, since he joined the firm in 1952. He is currently Sargent & Lundy's specialist in transformers.

O 970,615 10088t+

Resume 2 of 3 SAHGENT S LUNDY Leonard R. Stensland O

Memberships Illinois Society of Professional Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

- Transformer Committee Publication "A Study of Twin Conductor Arrangement"(coauthor Dr.

E.T.B. Gross), AIEE Transactions, Vol. 72, Pt. 3 (1958)

O 970,615 100884

SARGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Leonard R. Stensland

,m (b

Power Plant Desis s Proiects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Havana 6 Coal 439 1978 Illinois Power Senior Electrical 1974 to 1976 Company Project Engineer Newton i Coal 567 1977 Central Illinois Senior Electrical 1973 to 1976 Public Service Project Engineer Company Meredosia 4 Oil '194 1975 Centrailllinois Senior Electrical 1973 to 1975 Public Service Project Engineer Company Ghent 1,2 Coal 5?! 1974/1977 Kentucky Utilities Senior Electrical 1972 to 1975 (each) Company Project Engineer Baldwin 1-3 Coal 1655 1970/1973/ Illinois Power Senior Electri:al 1968 to 1974 (total) 1975 Company Project Engineer Coffeen 2 Coal 612 1972 Central Illinois Senior Electrical 1970 to 1973 Public Service Project Engineer Company Kincaid 1,2 Coal 580 1967/1968 Commonwealth Electrical Project 1964 to 1968 (each) Edison Company Engineer Wood River 3 Coal 356 1964 Illinois Power Electrical Engineer 1961 to 1964 Company State Line 4 Coal & 325 1962 Commonwealth Electrical Engineer 1955 to 1961 Gas ,

Edison Company Hennepin 2 Coal & 200 1959 Illinois Power Electrical Engineer 1956 to 1959 Gas Company

[d 'N 970,615 100884

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ - _l

SARGENTS LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Homer S. Taylor O

V Title Associate and Head Quality Assurance Division Education . Ohio State University - B.E.E. - 1972 Appointed Associate - 1983 Responsibilities Mr. Taylor is responsible to the Director of Services for formulating and administering the Quality Assurance Programs for both nuclear- and fossil-fired power plants. He develops the general Quality Assurance procedures necessary for implementation of the programs and coordinates the preparation of detailed procedures prepared by other departments and divisions. He is responsible for interfacing with the client's Quality Assurance organizations and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). He also takes responsibility for training sessions in the use and implementation of the Quality Assurance program and procedures for all personnel involved in safety-related activities. He directs internal and external audits of O consulting organizations retained by Sargent & Lundy. He is also responsible for establishing and maintaining controls for identification, storage, and retrieval of quality assurance records.

Experience Mr. Taylor has served in his present capacity since May of 1982 and has extensive experience in Quality Assurance administration. Since January of 1974, when Mr. Taylor was appointed senior Quality Assurance instructor, he has developed and maintained Quality Assurance procedures that meet established government and industry requirements for nuclear power plant quality assurance. In 1979 he developed the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Program for fossil-fueled power plants.

Before assuming the position of head of the Quality Assurance Division, Mr. Taylor served as assistant head for 6 years. He was responsible for assisting the head of the Division in the operation, planning, and supervision of the Quality Assurance Division.

Previous to this, Mr. Taylor served as senior Quality Assurance administrator for nearly 2 years. During this time, he was responsible for the preparation and maintenance of the Sargent & Lundy Quality Assurance Manual and ensuring its continued conformance to applicable codes, standards, and regulatory requirements.

i D i

970,631 ~

102684

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Homer S. Taylor O

Experience, Continued Prior to moving to the Quality Assurance Division in January of 1974, Mr. Taylor served as an electrical engineer for 1-1/2 years on a 985-MW nuclear-fueled generating station.

His responsibilities included design engineering on various electrical plant systems. Mr. Taylor joined Sargent & Lundy in 1972.

Membership American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Committee on Nuclear Quality Assurance - Main Committee

- Design and Procurement Subcommittee

- Procurement Control Work Group 9

i l

O 970,631 102684

Selected Experienca Record 3 cf 3 SARGENT& LUNDY Homer S. Taylor O

Power Plant Desisp Project Rated Gross Operating A '; . r.t Station - Unit Puel MW Dete(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Clinton 1 Nuclear 983 1986 Illinois Power Electrical Engineer 6-72 to 1-74 Company O

O 970,631 102684

5 ARGENT E LUNDY VIII-3 REVISION 1 4/5/85 ,

C. Senior Review Committee .

e O ,

l l

1 1

I I

l f

O 4, i

,.__-.,,-.__,.._.,,_y._,__ ., ,,m,,_,-- , , . , ,_ . . . .- . _ , _ _ . , _ . , _ . , _ _ . , _ . _ _ _ _ . - , _ , - , . - __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ - _

Resume 1 of 3 SARGENT& LUNDY Eugene V. Abraham O

Title Partner and Manager Mechanical Department Education University of Illinois - B.S.M.E. - 1960 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Arizona Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Michigan Nevada New York Oklahoma Wisconsin Admitted to Partnership - 1976 Anpointed Associate - 1971 Responsibilities Mr. Abraham directs all mechanical engineering and design at Sargent & Lundy. He reviews and participates in major matters of engineering and design of projects. He ensures the coordination of mechanical engineering activities with those of other departments. He authorizes department standards for engineering, design, and administration. Mr. Abraham also has responsibility for all project directors and all Mechanical Department division heads.

/3 Q Experience Mr. Abraham has 24 years of experience in mechanical engineering. He has had extensive experience in all phases of the mechanical engineering design of major power plants encompassing over 20 units with more than 12,000 MW of generating capacity. Prior to becoming manager of the Mechanical Department, Mr. Abraham was assistant manager. Previous to that, he was a Partner and project director who was responsible to the Sargent & Lundy Partnership for the execution of power plant projects including i

two ll75-MW nuclear units. He has directed numerous special studies including site evaluation, gas turbine, and coal conversions.

Prior to his admission to the Partnership, he was the project manager for four 618-MW fossil-fired generating units for an Indiana utility, three 511-MW coal-fired stations for a Kentucky client, and a 697-MW fossil unit for a utility in New York. Before this, he was the project engineer on a number of large power plant installations. Mr. Abraham joined Sargent &

Lundy in 1960.

Memberships American Power Conference l American Society of Mechanical Engineers l National Society of Professional Engineers (3

O 970,001 101084 l

Resume '

SARGENT & LUNDY Eugene V. Abraham l O

Publications Mr. Abraham has also directed the preparations and prepared a number of reports, studies, and technical papers.

O

,z0,001 101084

Selected Experience Record y og 3 SARGENT8 LUNDY Eugene V. Abraham t, )

%d Power Plant Denisp Projects Rated Gross Operating Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assisunent Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 Suspended Public Service Indiana Project Director (each)

Hancock 1,2 Coal 650 1993/1999 Kentucky Utilities Project Director (each) (held) Company Gibson 5 Coal 618 1982 Public Service Indiana Project Director Edgewater 5 Coal 380 1985 Wisconsin Power and Project Director Light Company MTA Fossil Plant Gas, 697 1996 New York Power Project Manager Oil & Refuse (held) Authority Gibson 1-4 Coal 618 1975-1979 Public Service Indiana Project Manager (each)

Ghent 2-4 Coal 511 1977/1981/1984 Kentucky Utilities Project Manager (each)~ Company 7"))

(V Teche 3 Gas & Oil 361 1971 Central Louisiana Electric Company Project Manager Wilkes 2,3 Gas 352 1970/1972 Southwestern Electric Mechanical Project Engineer (each) Power Company Coughlin 7 Gas & Oil 230 1966 Central Louisiana Elec- Mechanical Project Engineer tric Company Cof feen 1 Coal 358 1965 Central Illinois Public Mechanical Project Engineer Service Company O

O 970,001 101084

SARGENT& LUNDY Resum 1 of 4 Carmen M. Chiappetta p.

t i V

Title Partner and Assistant Manager Electrical Department Education Illinois Institute of Technology - B.S.E.E. - 1960 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Illinois Indiana Michigan Ohio South Carolina Wisconsin Admitted to Partnership - 1982 Appointed Associate - 1974 Responsibilities As assistant manager of the Electrical Department, Mr.

Chiappetta assists in the direction of the work of electrical engineers engaged in the design and engineering of the electrical systems for fossil and nuclear power plants, in engineering substations and transmission lines and in making power system engineering studies.

Expxience In his previous assignment as senior electrical project ,

engineer, Mr. Chiappetta has been en a b electrical phases of large nuclear-fue eged in the design of the steam-electric generating stations. His work included the basic station layout, the engineering and design of the various plant electrical systems, the development of control schemes and schematic diagrams, the overall responsibility for development of the single-line diagram, guiding the preparation of the specifications for the equipment, reviewing proposals, making recommendations to the client for purchases, and the preparation of the electrical portions of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing safety analysis reports. He worked with the client and with suppliers' representatives to resolve design problems, and coordinated the electrical design with the work of other Sargent & Lundy departments.

Mr. Chiappetta's assignments have included the Southeast Fast Oxide Reactor Test Facility (SEFOR) and six ll30-MW units of three major nuclear generating stations in the Midwest. He has also made special studies in nuclear areas, such as reactor containment electrical penetration assemblies, cable system nuclear applications, plant security systems, environmental qualification of electrical equipment, and quality assurance requirements related to the design of nuclear plants. Mr. Chiappetta joined Sargent & Lundy in 1964.

O O

970,092 101184

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 2 of 4 Carmen M. Chiappetta O

Memberships Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

- Power Engineering Society Nuclear Power Engineering Committee (1969 to present)

- Secretary and Chairman of the General Plant Criteria Subcommittee Publications " Nuclear Power Generating Stations: An Overview of ElectricalInsulation Applications," presented at the Advanced Materials Symposium of the American Ceramic Society, May 10,1974

" Nuclear Power Standards - A Status Report of Work in Progress within Subcommittee 1 (General Plant Design Criteria) of the IEEE Nuclear Power Engineering Committee,"

presented at the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Nuclear Power Systems Symposiums, November 1973,1974,1975, and 1976

" Power Supplies"(coauthor D. C. McClintock), a guide to choosing power source systems published as a chapter in the Atomic Energy Commission's luclear Power Reactor Instrumentation Systems Handbooks TD-25932-P1,1973

" Nuclear Plant Security: Plant Physical Design Features" (coauthor C. B. Brown, Jr.), a technical paper presented at the 128th meeting of the Edison Electric Institute in Los Angeles, California, February 1976, published in the IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, January / February 1977 "Two Years Af ter TMI," a summary of a technical panel presentation on Post-Three Mile Island Events, given at the-Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, March 1981, published in the September 1981 issue of the Midwest Engineer, Directory Issue

" Qualifying Safety-Related Nuclear Power Plant Electric Equipment: A Dilemma," a technical paper presented at the 1978 Annual Meeting of the American Nuclear Society, published in the Transactions of the meeting

" Nuclear Plants Require Tight Security"(coauthor C. B. Brown, Jr.), a technical paper published in Electrical World, August 1975 0

970,092 101184

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 3 of 4 -

Carmen M. Chiappetta p

V

' Publications, Continued " Electrical Design Considerations at the SEFOR Project"

' (coauthor D. C. McClintock), a technical paper presented at the Atomic Power Engineering Group Conference in Fayetteville, Arkansas, October 1967 "Special Electrical Design Features" (coauthor B. G. Treece), a technical paper presented at the Atomic Power Engineering Group Conference at the Zion Nuclear Power Plant, October 1971

" Nuclear Power Generation: An Overview of the Electrical Engineered Safety Features," a technical paper summarizhg application of the current regulatory requirements to the design of electrical systems and features, presented at tFe Chicago Chapter of the IEEE, March 1971 O

i O

970,092 101184

4 l

SARGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 4 of 4 )

Carmen M. Chiappetta O

Power Plant Desum Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 Suspended Public Service Senior Electrical 1974 to 1982 (each) Indiana Project Engineer Byron 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 1985/1986 Commonwealth Electrical 1972 to 1974 Braidwood 1,2 (each) 1986/1987 Edison Company Project Engineer Zion 1,2 Nuclear 1085 1973/1974 Commonwealth Electrical 1968 to 1972 (each) Edison Company Project Engineer SEFOR Nuclear 7 1967 Southwest Atomic Electrical 1964 to 1964 Energy Associates Engineer O

O 970,092 101184 J

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 2 Richard X. French f3 l lG Title Partner and Manager Electrical Department Education Illinois Institute of Technology - Graduate Courses in Electrical and Nuclear Engineering

, Illinois Institute of Technology - B.S.E.E. - 1948 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Nebraska Nevada New York Ohio Oklahoma Wisconsin Illinois Teaching Certificate as Instructor - Industrial Electronics Admitted to Partnership - 1977 Appointed Associate - 1970 Responsibilities As manager of the Electrical Department, Mr. French p directs the work of electrical engineers who are engaged in

( designing and engineering electrical systems for fossil and nuclear power plants, substations, and transmission lines and in making power system engineering studies.

Experience Mr. French has extensive experience in electrical engineer-ing, at increasing levels of responsibility. Before his appointment as manager of the Electrical Department, he was the assistant manager of the Electrical Department. Previous to that, as head of the Electrical Analytical Division, Mr.

French was responsible for planning studies for power system capacity additions and interconnections, and for planning and design studies involving transmission substations and lines, distribution systems, and other special power system problems. This work included economic analyses, load flows, short circuits, stability, insulation coordination, grounding, load control, relay applications and settings, metering, and communications. He also supervised the design of cathodic protection systems and noise abatement systems for power stations, and the development of company-wide computer applications related to the design of the electric facilities for power stations. In addition, he has served as a consultant on power system studies for projects outside the United States, including a transmission interconnection project in the Dominican Rerudic.

f\

U 970,188 101084

Resume 2 cf 2 SARGENT S LUNDY Richard X. French O

Experience, Continued He has extensive experience in the basic design and engineering of the electrical systems for power plants and substations. This work involved developing the basic electrical diagrams, determining requirements for specifications, analyzing proposals, and making recommendations for purchase and liaison with the client and suppliers. Projects on which he has worked include major power stations; large inter-connections, substations, and transmission lines up to 345 kV; and an 1100-kV ac test substation. Mr. French joined Sargent & Lundy in 1948.

Memberships Senior Member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

- Power Engineering Society

- Past-Chairman, Power Systems Engineering Committee

- Working Group 84 - Rotating Equipment Noise

-Industry and Applications Society

- Computer Society

- Engineering Management Society Publications Mr. French has written numerous papers and is the author of the Bulk Power Supply Economics section of the McGraw-Hill Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers.

970,188 O

101084

Resume 1 of 4 SARGENT& LUNDY Wilbert G. Hegener O

\ /

'w/

Title Partner and Director of Engineering Education Northwestern University - Graduate Courses in Business Administration Northwestern University - M.S.M.E. - 1948 University of Detroit - B.S.M.E. - 1947 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Arkansas Illinois Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Michigan New York Ohio Texas Wisconsin Appointed Director of Engineering - 1984 Admitted to Partnership - 1974 Appointed Associate - 1970 Responsibilities As Director of Engineering, Mr. Hegener is responsible for ensuring the application of competent power plant design engineering. He supervises the managers of Sargent & Lundy's Structural, Mechanical, and Electrical Departments. He reviews and participates in major matters of engineering and

('s design. Mr. Hegener assists the Senior Partner in formation of .

() company policies.

Experience Mr. Hegener has extensive experience in the mechanical engineering and design of major steam-electric generating stations. Prior to his appointment as Director of Engineering, Mr. Hegener was Assistant Director of Engineering. He assisted the Director of Engineering to ensure the application of competent power plant engineering. Before becoming Assistant Director of Engineering, Mr. Hegener was manager of the Mechanical Department. Previous to that, he was assistant manager. He also was a Partner and project director who was responsible to the Sargent & Lundy Partnership for the execution of power plant design projects for several client firms. These projects included a variety of fossil fuel and nuclear plant designs for utilities in the U.S.A. and overseas.

The projects involved 16 g,enerating units in various stages of completion and other project consulting services.

Prior to his admission to the Partnership, Mr. Hegener was a project manager with responsibility for management of design of fossil-fueled and nuclear generating stations. His design experience involved a wide variety of design conditions, site conditions, and operating conditions. His responsibility included the preparation of preliminary design studies, the selection of the basic plant parameters, the development of

.n the station general arrangements, the coordination of 970,246 100984

Resume 2 of 4 SARGENT & LUNDY wilbert G. Hegener O

Experience, Continued engineering schedules, construction schedules, and station cost estimates. He coordinated the project design activities of the Mechanical, Electrical, and Structural Engineering disciplines as well as the related staff activities in the support of a project design.

Mr. Hegener joined Sargent & Lundy in 1948. Between 1957 and 1965, he was engaged in high-pressure valve manufacturing as a research coordinator and chief engineer. He rejoined Sargent & Lundy in 1966. He was appointed assistant manager of the Mechanical Department in 1977, manager of the Mechanical Department in 1978, and Assistant Director of Engineering in 1982.

Memberships American Society of Mechanical Engineers

- ASME Sec.111 Pump and Valve Code (1965-1968)

Western Society of Engineers American Nuclear Society

- ANSI B31.1 Power Piping Code (1960-1974)

- ANSI B16 Subcommittee 4 Steel Flanges and Flanged Fittings (1960-1974)

- ANSI B16 Subcommittee 3 Details and Stresses (1960-1974)

Manufacturers Standardization Society of Valve & Fitting Industry (1958-1965)

O 970,246 100984

SANGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 4 Wilbert G. Hegener

)

v Fosell Power Plant Desian Projects -

Rated Gross Operating ^ '. .c . .t Station - Unit Fuel MT Date(s) Claent ' ." " - r.t Date(s)

Six Standard Coal / 750 1993-1999 Middle South Project Director 1977 to 1978 Units Lignite (each) (held) Services, Inc.

Pleasant Prairie Coal 570 1980/1985 Wisconsin Electric Project Director 1974 to 1978 1,2 (each) Power Company Edgewater 5 Coal 380 1985 Wisconsin Power and Project Director 1974 to 1978 Light Company Flint Creek 1 Coal 512 1978 Southwestern Elec- Project Director 1974 to 1978 tric Power Company Welsh 2,3 Coal 512 1980/1982 Southwestern Elec- Project Director 1974 to 1978 (each) tric Power Company Columbia 1,2 Coal 512 1975/1978 Wisconsin Power and Project Director 1974 to 1978 (each) Light Company A East Bend 2 Coal 648 1981 The Cincinnati Gas & Project Director 1974 to 1978 I Electric Company G) Miami Fort 8 Coal 512 1978 The Cincinnati Gas & Project Director 1974 to 1978 Electric Company MD14 Coal & 394 1982-1984 The Israel Electric Project Director 1974 to 1978 Oil (each) Corporation, Ltd.

Welsh I Coal 512 1977 Southwestern Elec. Project Director 1974 to 1977 tric Power Company Miami Fort 7 Coal 512 1975 The Cincinnati Gas & Project Director 1974 to 1975 Electric Company Battle Creek Gas & 200,000 lb/hr 1942 Kellogg Company Project Manager 1%8 to 1970 Oil Edgewater 4 Coal 339 1969 Wisconsin Power and Mechanical Project 1965 to 1966 Light Company Engineer Beckjord 2-4 Coal 397 1953/1954/ The Cincinnati Gas & Mechanical Project 1948 to 1957 (total) 1958 Electric Company Engineer Beckjord 1 Coal 100 1952 The Cincinnati Gas & Mechanical Engineer 1948 to 1957 Electric Company v) 970,246 100984

l SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 4 of 4 Wilbert G. Hegener O

Nuclear Power Plant Design Projects Rated Gross Operating Assignment Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assignment Date(s)

Colf Creek 1 NucIcar 1100 1985 Kansas Gss and Project Director 1974 to 1978 E;ectric Company Zimmer i Nuclear 839 Suspended The Cincinnati Gas & Project Director 1974 to 1978 Electric Company Project Manager 1970 to 1974 NP-1 Nuclear 900 Cancelled The Israel Electric Project Director 1976 to 1977 Corporation,1.td.

Fort St. Vrain i Nuclear 333 1979 Public Service Project Manager 1966 to 1972 Colorado Donald C. Cook Nuclear 2126 1975/1978 Indiana-Michigan Project Manager 1967 to 1970 1,2 (intake (total) Electric Company structure)

Point Beach 1,2 Nuclear 495 1970/1972 Wisconsin Electric Project Manager 1966 to 1970 (intake (each) Power Company structure)

Experimental Nuclear 5 1956 U.S. Atomic Energy Mechanical Project 1955 to 1957 Boiling Water Commission Engineer Reactor 1 O

970,246 100984

SARGENT & LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Kenneth T. Kostal

(-

G Title Partner and Ascistant Manager Structural Department Education University of Illinois - M.S. Architectural Engineering - 1967 University of Illinois - B.S. Architecture - 1965 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Arizona Arkansas California Canada (Alberta)

Colorado Florida Indiana lowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Nebraska New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Structural Engineer - Illinois Admitted to Partnershio - 1979 Appointed Associate - 1978 Responsibilities Mr. Kostal assists the manager of the Structural Department v in coordinating all architector z.1, structural, and civil engineering and design for Sargent & Lundy. He assists the Department Manager in rr.atters of supervision, administration, personnels and technical policies. He provides direct administrative supervision of the Specification, Geotechnical, and Water Pescurces Site Development Divisions.

Experience Mr. Kostal has been involved in the st.uctural, architectural, and civil engineering aspects of numerous power plants. He began his Sargent & Lundy career as a designer on a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) naclear plant specifically involved in concrete foundation and steel superstructure design. He has progrt.ssed through a series of supervisory positions on various nuclear and fossil power plants i coordinating, structural, architectural, civil engineering, and draf ting activities.

In the area of nuclear power plants he has been responsible in the role of senior structural project en of both pressurized water reactor (PWR) gineer and boiling for the design water reactor (BWR) plants. This responsibility included the supervision of the design of the containment structures and associated other safety-related structures. While assigned to these projects he was intimately involved in the licensing activities associated with these projects and on numerous occasions presented technical discussions with the Nuclear

_)

970,329 101034 l

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Kenneth T. Kostal O

Experience Continued

. Regulatory Commission (NRC) relating to all structural aspects. He has also presented expert testimony to the Atomic Safety and License Board (ASLB) on various occasions.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1967, Mr. Kostal was a university instructor in structural design and an engineer responsible for the structural design and construction drawings for light office buildings.

l Memberships American Concrete Institute American Nuclear Society American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Illinois Western Engineering Society O

l i

l l

l 970,329 10108ts

[ ,

SARGENT& LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Kenneth T. Kostal

/

A i

V Power Plant Desian Projects Rated Gross Operating V ; . .-..t Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assianment Date(s)

Braidwood 1,2 Nuclear 1175 1986/1987 Commonwealth Project Director 1984 to present (each) Edison Company MTA Fossil Plant Coal, 697 1996 New York Power Senior Structural Project 1977 to 1979 Oil & (held) Authority Engineer Refuse Marble Hill 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 Suspended Public Service Senior Structural Project 1977 to 1979 (each) Indiana Engineer Byron 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 1985/1986 Commonwealth Senior Structural Project 1973 to 1979 Braidwood I,2 (each) 1986/1987 Edison Company Engineer / Structural Project Engineer Fort St. Vrain i Nuclear 330 1979 Public Service Senior Structural Project 1967 to 1978 Colorado Engineer / Structural Project Engineer / Structural Engineer Gibson I Coal 618 1976 Public Service Assistant Chief Structural 1971 to 1973 (o) Indiana Design Engineer Powerton 5,6 Coal 828 1972/1975 Commonwealth Assistant Chief Structura! 1971 to 1973 (each) Edison Company Design Engineer Knox Lee 5 Gas & 324 1974 Southwestern Elec- Assistant Chief Structural 1971 to 1973 Oil tric Power Company Design Engineer La Salle 1,2 Nuclear 1122 1982/1984 Commonwealth Assistant Chief Structural 1970 to 1973 (each) Edison Company Design Engineer / Supervising Design Engineer l Donald C. Cook Nuclear 2126 1975/1978 Indiana. Michigan Assistant Chief Structural 1970 to 1973 1,2 (total) Electric Company Design Engineer / Supervising Design Engineer l

l l

l l

I m

i .(v) 970,329 101084 L_

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 John M. McLaughlin A) t v

Title Partner and Manager Structural Department FAw ation Illinois Institute of Technology - M.S.C.E. - 1970 Illinois Institute of Technology - B.S.C.E. - 1958 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Alabama Alberta Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Florida Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Nebraska New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Civil Engineer -Israel Structural Engineer - Illinois Admitted to Partnership - 1977 Appointed Associate - 1973 Responsibilities As manager of the Structural Department, Mr. McLaughlin is responsible for and coordinates all the architectural, structural and civil engineering and design for Sargent &

Lundy Mr. McLaughlin initiates, reviews, and authorizes all Structural Department standards, procedures, and reports, including those pertaining to technical administration and quality assurance.

Experience Mr. McLaughlin has 22 years of experience in the field of civil engineering, which includes civil-structural-architectural engineering and design work for fossil and nuclear power plants. His assignments have included 16 units with total capacity in excess of 10,000 MW. He has also been involved with numerous studies.

Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy in 1964, he practiced civil engineering for a private firm and with the U.S. Air Force.

Memberships American Concrete Institute American Institute of Steel Construction American Society of Civil Engineers Building Officials & Code Administrators International, Inc.

Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Post-Tensioning Institute Seismological Society of America

[v-970,397 101984

1 1

SARGENT& LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 John M. McLaughlin O

Memberships, Continued Structural Engineers Association of Illinois Structural Stability Research Council Publications " Foundation Design"(coauthored), Sargent & Lundy General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1976

" Tornado-Generated Missiles"(coauthor W. Huang), American Society of Civil Engineers Specialty Conference on Structural Design of Nuclear Plant Facilities, New Orleans, Louisiana, December 1975

" Comparison of Steel Trusses and Girders for Long Span Roof Framing," American Society of Civil Engineers Annual Structural Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio, April 1974

" Unusual Loadings for Nuclear Power Plants," General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1973

" Design of Nuclear Power Plant for Tornados," Tornado Phenomenology and Related Protective Design Merures Conference, University of Wisconsin, April 1970 "The First Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vesselin the U.S.,"

Atomic Power Engineering Group, Denver, Colorado, October 1969 "Effect of Earthquake Criteria upon Nuclear Plant Design" (coauthored), American Power Conference , Chicago, Illinois, April 1969 970,397 9

101984

SARGENT & LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 John M. MCLaughlin I \

V Power Plant Desian Projects Rated Gross Operating ." -- 5. . e . .t Station - Unit Fuel MW Date(s) Client Assunment Date(s)

Coleto Creek 1 Coal 570 1980 Central Power and Senior Structural 9-74 to 1977 Light Company Project Engineer B.M. Davis 2 Gas & 324 1976 Central Power and Senior Structural 3-73 to 1977 Oil Light Company Project Engineer Ghent 2 Coal 511 1977 Kentucky Utilities Senior Structural 1-73 to 1977 Blend Company Project Engineer Byron 1,2 Nuclear  !!75 1985/1986 Commonwealth Edison Senior Structural 9-71 to 1977 Braidwood 1,2 (each) 1986/1987 Company Project Engineer Fort St. Vrain 1 Nuclear '330 1979 Public Service Structural Project 4-67 to 1977 Colorado Engineer Ghent! Coal 511 1974 Kentucky Utilities Structural Project 6-69 to 1-75 Company Engineer p Indiana Harbor Coal, 720,000 1967 Youngstown Sheet & Structural Supervising 1-66 to 6-67 q Works Oil & #/hr Boiler Tube Company Design Engineer

( Gas 680,000 CFM Turbo Blower Riverside 5 Coal 125 1961 lowa-Illinois Gas and Structural Supervising 9-66 to 5-67 Electric Company Design Engineer Beckjord 6 Coal 434 1969 The Cincinnati Gas & Structural Engineer 5-65 to 12-65 Electric Company Kincaid 1,2 Coal 580 1967/1968 Commonwealth Edison Structural Engineer 8-64 to 5-65 (each) Company Warren HPB 1,2 Coal 300,000 1965/1972 Republic Steel Structural Engineer 3-64 to 8-64

1. /hr Corporation Boiler Ol

\

v 970,397 10198f4

r SARGENTE LUNDY Resume 1 of 3 Henry M. Sroka f

v Title Partner, Project Director and Assistant Mechanical Department Manager Education University of Illinois - B.S.M.E. - 1957 Registrations Professional Engineer:

Arkansas Florida IllinMs Kansas Louisiana Mississippi Wisconsin Admitted to Partnership - 1977 Appointed Associate - 1971 Responsibilities As a project director, Mr. Sroka is responsible for the implementation of the work and the technicalintegrity of the project during its execution. He directs a project team staffed by a project manager, project engineers, and other technical personnel. Mr. Sroka consults with the client and the project team in planning and scheduling the project, and developing the appropriate cost control systems. He leads and monitors the development of project management documents such as g engineering and construction schedules, man-hour estimates, project cost estimates, and the scope of work. Mr. Sroka regularly reports to the client regarding performance on the project and the status of engineering and construction, directs the appropriate application of the Sargent & Lundy engineering policies and philosophies, and maintains surveillance of the design to ensure their implementation throughout the project.

Experience Mr. Sroka has experience in all phases of the mechanical engineering design of major steam-electric generating stations. At present he is responsible for development of six 750-MW standard coal / lignite-fired units and a 380-MW coal-fired unit. He is also responsible for the design of a 985-MW nuclear powered unit. Previously, he directed wor k on three coal-fired 585-MW units, and one 439-MW unit in the Midwest. He also led the design and construction management of the Southwest Experimental Fast Oxide Reactor Facility (SEFOR)in Fayetteville, Arkansas, and a 356-MW coal facility in Illinois.

Mr. Sroka has experience with preliminary engineering necessary to support environmental studies t.nd licensing. He has directed projects of this kind in four str.tes. Mr. Sroka joined Sargent & Lundy in 1957.

O O

970,607 102484

SARGENT8 LUNDY Resume 2 of 3 Henry M. Sroka O

Memberships American Society of Mechanical Engineers Former member of Executive Committee, Code for Pressure Piping ANSI B31 and ASME National Nominating Committee 1st Alternate Panelist " Standard Fossil Plants - What are They?" 1979 Joint Power Generation Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, October 1979 Publications " Reference Design for a Coal-Fired Unit," Paper No. GEC-P187, General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1980

" Standard Plants - What Are They?" Southeastern Electric Exchange, Washington D.C., April 1978

" Equipment and Material Lead Times and Plant Schedules,"

Paper No. GEC-P136, General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1975 "Look Before You Peak," Paper No. GEC-P65, General Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 1969 "Baldwin Power Station Takes Advantage of Mine Mouth Coal" (coauthors T. W. Schroeder and E.E. Connon), Proceedings of the American Power Conference, pp. 377-391, 1969 "AEC Information Meeting on the High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor," Paper No. APEG-P105, Atomic Power Engineering Group Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, February 1961 "AEC Information Meeting on Advanced Materials for Gas-Cooled Reactors," Paper No. APEG-P82, Atomic Power Engineering Group Meetir.g, Chicago, Illinois, February 1960 0

970,607 102484

SARGENTS LUNDY Selected Experience Record 3 of 3 Henry M. Sroka

/D U

Power Plant Desaan Projects Rated Gross Operating Station - Unit Fuel MW  ? t .. _ _ r-Date(s) Client A '_-_z:

Dete(s)

Edgewater 5 Coal 380 1985 Wisconsin Power and Project Director 1981 to present Light Company Six Standard Coal / 750 1993-1999 Middle South Project Director 1977 to present Units Lignite (each) (held) Services, Inc.

Clinton 1 Nuclear 985 1986 Illinois Power Project Director 1977 to present Company Project Manager 1972 to 1977 Havana 6 Coal 439 1978 tilinois Power Project Director 1978 Company Project Manager 1973 to 1977 Baldwin 3 Coal 585 1975  !!!inois Power Mechanical Project 1973 to 1975 Company Engineer Baldwin 2 Coal 585 1973 Illinois Power

- Mechanical Project 1971 to 1973 Company Engineer d Baldwin I Coal 585 1970 tilinois Power Mechanical Project 1966 to 1970 Company Engineer SEFOR Nuclear 20 1967 General Electric Mechanical Project 1964 to 1966 Company Engineer Wood River 5 Coal 356 1964 tilinois Power Mechanical Project 1961 to 1964 Company Engineer Elk River Nuclear $8 1961 United Power Assistant Nuclear 1961 Association Project Engineer Preliminary Esuineering Projects to Support Environmental Studies and Licensing 5, ite Project Assignment Client Assaanment .. Date(s)

Wilton Site Geotechnical site Louisiana Power & Project Director 1981 evaluation Light Company New Orleans Area Geotechnical site New Orleans Public Project Director 1981 evaluation Service Inc.

Fairview Site Preliminary engi- Illinois Power Project Director 1979 neering ior EIS Company DeSoto Site BACT, PSD input for Mississippi Power & Project Director 1979 site Light Company Wilton Site Pretoninary engineering Louisiana Power & Project Director

,Q lor EIS Light Company 1978 V '

970,607 '

102484

SARGENTS LUNDY Appendix A REVISION 1 O 4/5/85 Page A-1 l1 l

APPENDIX A f

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

~O

,O i

SARGENT S LUNDY Appendix A REVISION 1 0' 4/5/85 Page A-2 l1 SARGENT & LUNDY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM OF HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION O

Approved By P. L. % attelet Project Director H. 5. Taylor Head, Quality Assurance Division Revision Date O

SARGENTS LUNDY Apndix A R EVISION 1 4/3/85

{s\

s Page A-3 l 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM OF HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION O TABLE OF CONTENTS Section TITLE 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Organization and Responsibilities 3.0 Design Review Control 4.0 Document Control and Records 5.0 Quality Monitoring O

SARGENT E LUNDY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Appendix A REVISION 1 77 4/3/85 v/ Page A-4 l 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This program establishes the quality assurance requirements for work performed by Sargent & Lundy (S&L) on the independent design review of the Hope Creek Generating Station. This program provides controls for the design review activities specified in the work scope document.

This quality assurance program complies with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, as described in the NRC approved S&L Quality Assurance Program Topical Report, SL-TR-1 A, Revision 6, to the extent applicable to a design review process and as described herein. Criteria addressed by this program are organization, design control, document control, and QA monitoring. Compliance with the requirements of this quality assurance program and the implementing project program plan and instructions is mandatory for personnel performing the design review.

Personnel participating in the design review are provided with indoctrination and training covering the quality assurance program and specific project instructions applicable to their work.

2.0 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Organization Chart The organization chart for the review team is shown in the review program plan. The organization chart indicates lines of authority and lines of communication for the project team.

2.2 Responsibilities 2.2.1 Project Director The Project Director is a Partner of the firm and represents S&L Management on the review team. He is responsible to the Client for the overall conduct and results of the design review. The Project Director shall bc responsible for approval of this quality assurance program.

2.2.2 The Head, Quality Assurance Division The Head, Quality Assurance Division is responsible for preparation, approval and control of this project quality assurance program.

He is also responsible for reviewing and concurring with the project review plan, q

v

SARGENTS LUNDY A >pendix A R EVISION 1

/~'N 4/3/85

( ,) Page A-5 l 1 2.2.3 Project Manager The Project Manager reports to the Project Director. He shall be responsible for:

- The execution of the review activities in accordance with this quality assurance program.

- The preparation, approval, and control of a project review plan and instructions. ,

- Acting as the main contact at S&L for PSE&G and its contractors.

- Coordinating all meetings and controlling and distributing correspon-dence, meeting notes, telecopies and bi-weekly status reports.

- Ensuring that the project personnel are properly trained in the use of the project review plan and instructions.

2.2.4 Quality Assurance Coordinator (PQAC)

U The Quality Assurance Coordinator reports to the Senior Quality Assurance Coordinator. He sha!! be responsible for:

- Review and approval of the project review instructions.

- Monitoring of the review work to determine conformance to this quality assurance program.

- Participation in the review of the design process.

- Issuance of corrective action requests on the deficiencies identified during the monitoring process.

- Maintaining a QA activity log.

2.2.3 Project Review Team The responsibilities of the members of the Project Review Team are addressed in the review program plan and instructions.

A V

SARGENT & LUNDY A pendix A R EVISION 1 I)

V 4/5/85 Page A-6 1 l

3.0 DESIGN REVIEW CONTROL 3.1 General The design review shall comply with the requirements of this quality assurance program. The necessary controls to be used by the design review team are governed by the project review program plan and instructions, which shall be included in the Project Manual. The project review program plan and instructions shall clearly state the requirements and practices for the project team. Preparation and issuance of the Project Manual shall precede initiation of the actual design review work.

3.2 Project Review Plan The project review plan shall describe the review scope, the overall approach to the design review and the responsibilities for the review tearn. The plan shall define the project instructions required for the review.

,m 3.3 Review Project Instructions

( )

The project instructions shall address the following reviews, as applicable:

- Systems design compliance with the FSAR and licensing commitments.

- Technical adequacy of system design.

- Proper control of design process and interfaces.

- Adequacy of design change document control.

- Adequacy of the documentation of design (calculations, analyses, drawings, specifications).

- Potential safety concerns in the system design.

- Adequacy of conveyance of design information to the constructors.

4.0 DOCUMENT CONTROL AND RECORDS 4.1 General The quality assurance program is prepared under the direction of the Head, Quality Assurance Division and approved by the Project Director and Head, m

Quality Assurance Division.

( )

l V

SARGENT5 LUNDy Appendix A REVISION 1

/ ,; 4/5/85 ki Page A-7 l1 A Project Manual shall be established by the Project Manager. It shall contain the project review program plan and project instructions.

The project review plan is prepared and approved by the Project Manager, and concurred with by the Head, Quality Assurance Division.

Project instructions are prepared by the Project Manager or a designated Project Engineer, reviewed by the PQAC, and approved by the Project Manager.

4.2 Document Control The project review program plan used to implement the quality assurance program shall provide for the preparation, approval, issuance, distribution and revision of the project review plan and instructions.

The Project Manager shall establish a plan for the turnover of program documents. The turnover plan shall be concurred with by PSE&G and may be

,o completed progressively upon issuance of the document or at the termination of ij the design review effort.

Sargent & Lundy retention of these documents shall be determined by the Project Manager and addressed in the project review plan.

Figure i lists the review program documents which control the design renew activities, and identifies the personnel responsible for their preparation, review and approval.

5.0 QUALITY MONITORING The PQAC shall perform both scheduled and unscheduled monitoring and/or investigations for assessing the effective implementation of the quality assurance program by the project. The PQAC has access to appropriate levels of management. l 1 The PQAC shall issue corrective action requests on deficiencies and/or questions identified during the monitoring process. These requests shall be responded to by the Project Team. Both requests and their responses shall be filed by the PQAC.

O U

SARGENT & LUNDY A gndix A R:. VISION 1 4/5/85 (x Page A-8 Final 1 l

Figure 1 l DESIGN REVIEW DOCUMENTS REVIEW FOR QA PROGRAM DOCUMENT PREPARER COMPLIANCE APPROVAL Quality Assurance Head, QA Division Head, QA Division Project Director Program and Head, QA Division Project Review Plan Project Manager Head, QA Division Project Manager Project Instructions Project Manager Quality Assurance Project Manager Coordinator O

l I

L l

f l

O l

l r i

SARGENT E LUNDY AGREEMENT CONCERNING Appendix B INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM REVISION 1

]

L' OF HOPE CREEK POWER STATION 4/3/85 Page B-1 l1 I (print or type name) hereby agree that:

1) I will notify the Project Manager if during the term of this project I, or any member of my immediate family (parents, spouse and children) acquire any financial interest in Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G), Bechtel Power Corporation or any other PSE&G contractor working on Hope Creek.

2) If I identify what I believe to be a potential discrepancy having the potential for a significant safety impact,I will immediately notify the Project Manager for further evaluation.

3) I wi!! treat information revealed to me in the cource of my work on this project as confidential and will not disclose it to others outside the S&L project team except as directed by the Project Manager.

(D (Signature) (Date) i l

1 O

SARGENT & LUNDY HOPE CREEK IDVP Appendix B PERSONNEL QUESTIONNAIRE REVISION 1

/3 4/5/85

() Page B-2 l1 After first being duly sworn hereby deposes and says:

(print or type name)

1. I have no previous involvement with the Hope Creek Project, except as noted on the reverse side.

2. I have not previously been hired by Public Service Electric & Cas (PSE&G), Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC), or any other PSE&G contractor working on Hope Creek to perform similar design review, except as noted on the reverse side.

3. I have not been previously employed by PSE&G, BPC or any other PSE&G contractor working on Hope Creek except as noted on the reverse side.

4. I do not own or control stock of PSE&G, BPC, or any other PSE&G contractor working on Hope Creek, except as noted on the reverse side.

5. No member of my immediate family (parents, spouse and children) is employed by PSE&G, BPC, or any other PSE&G contractor working on Hope Creek, except as noted on the reverse side.

/3 I have not been offered future employment by PSE&G, BPC, or any other PSE&G 6.

('-) contractor working on Hope Creek, except as noted on the reverse side.

I hereby af firm that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

(Signature) (Date)

Subscribed and sworn to me before me on this day of ,1985 My commission expires:

Notary Public l

1 i

I i

O V

l i

h.

SARGENT S LUNDY HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Appendix B - SAMPLE INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM REVISION 1

( - ELECTRICAL CHECKLIST 2 4/3/83

\"') (Cont'd) Page B-3 l 1

Subject:

Redundancy and Class IE Channel Separation Between Circuits for Isolation Valves A. Description of redundancy requirements for subject valves.

B. Source documents identifying redundancy requirements for subject valves.

C. Description of Class lE channel separation requirements for subject valves.

O)

L D. Source documents identifying Class IE channel separation requirements for subject valves.

E. Discussion of the general Class IE channel separation requirements for the station relative to whether meeting the general requirements will satisfy the specific redundancy and separation requirements for the subject valves. If meeting the general requirements is not sufficient, indicate the additional requirements that must be imposed for the case of the subject valves.

[ 4

/

SARGENT& LUNDY HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Appendix B - SAMPLE INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION REVISION 1

(~~'s PROGRAM ELECTRICAL CHECKLIST 2 4/3/83

\j (Cont'd) Page B-4 1 F. Source documents identifying the general Class IE channel separation requirements for the station.

G. Design documents reviewed which implement the electrical (circuit) redundancy and Class IE channel separation requirements for power circuits from subject valves to the source 480V Unit Substations.

Q V

H. Design documents reviewed which implement the electrical (circuit) redundancy and Class IE channel separation requirements for control circuits from subject valves to the source 480V MCC's, control power cabinets and first level interlock / sensors.

I. Design documents reviewed which implement the physical Class IE channel separation requirements for power circuits from subject valves to the source 480V Unit Substations.

o C

f N

SARGENT S LUNDY HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Appendix B - SAMPLE INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION REVISION 1

(~') PROGRAM ELECTRICAL: CHECKLIST 2 4/3/g3

'w) (Cont'd) Page B-5 l 1

3. Design documents reviewed which implement the physical C! ass IE channel separation requirements for control circuits from subject valves to the source 480V MCC's, control power cabinets and first level interlocks / sensors.

K. Equipment and cables verified by field walkdown to meet design document redundancy and Class IE channel separation requirements.

um L. Comments:

(J) w i

1 M.

Conclusions:

i l

/~'i V

l l

ADocnc'.tx B --

SA"PLE File No.: COD-Project Name: Project No.: Revision-O Specification Reviewed By:

Review I*I8"*I")

Date:

Number: Approved By: Date:

(signature)

QuellficaHon Report No Title, Rev and Date: _.

A. REFERENCES In addition to References D1 and D2in Form MAS COD-2 3.the following documents were used as a basis for developing this qualification checkfist:

A1. IEEE Standard 382-1980,"lEEE Standard foi Qualification of Safety-Related Valve Actuators" A 2. Otner. specify: .

8 EOUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION B1. Does the oualification report identify the samples and the bases on which samples were selected to represent a generic actuator group?

i O Yes C No C Not Applicable i

Comments O B2. Is the equipment issted in the report identical to that is being supplied under the specification?

C Yes C No -justify if acceptable B3. Does the report include the document requirements specified in Ref. A1, Sec. 7.2 and 7.37 C Yes O No C Not Applicable Comments l C. QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS Does the analysis include the following details?

C1. Identification of Valve Actuators

• performance requirements.

D Yes O No D Not Applicable

! Comments THIS FORM MAY BE USED ONLY AS A CHECKLIST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT TO FORM MAS-COC 2.3 OUALIFICATION OF CLASS 1E VALVE ACTUATORS COD-213 SARGENT&LUNDY

" ***" Page 1 of 4 L

I. "M A " N 4 Y 9 == f* t t *p g Page Il-7 1

Froject No.: Flie No.: COD- Revision C2. A listing of qualified service conditions.

i 1 O Yes Comments C No O Not Applicable C3. Do the service conditions envelop the plant operating cor.ditions?

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments C4. Do the mounting method and external connections of the Valve Actuator in the report sirQulate plant conditions?

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments C 5. Mathematical Model.

C5.1 Description of mathematical model (A regression analysis is considered a mathematical model).

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments C5.2 Pr'inciples by which model was developed (e g.. standards, test data, operating experience).

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments

{

C5.3 A hsting of the environmental variables monitored which affect equipment petformance.

I C Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments l

C5 4 Justification for any environmental variable not listed in C5.3.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments -

C5.5 Modelidentified such that equipment performance is a function of time and variables as listed l

in C5.3.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments l

{ L C O D-2.13 SARGENT E LUNDY

. -s Noime smo ,

pS9e 2 of 4 l

i

AnneM4v n -- e~ ry e Page B- 8 l1 Project No.: File No.: COD- - .,sio n b) C6. Extrapolation cf the Model.

C6.1 Identification cf postulated equipment failure modes.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments C6.2 The postulated f ailure modes for the equipment should be shown to be the same as those produced by the model.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable C6.3 The extrapolation of the model to the desired life must be justified by using:

' a. Confidence bounds.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable

b. Thermal testing of is component based on ttle aging rate of the regression line and,to same failure criteria.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable

c. Through surveillance requirements.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable

d. Other:

l Comments:

O V

l

! C6.4 Description of Analytical Methods. A written explanation of how the model was selected to represent a generic actuator group and the parameters on which the selection was based.

j I O Yes O No O Not Applicable l Comments l

l C7. A comparison of the Valve Actuator to be qualified to the qualified generic Valve Actuator:

Operating principle:

Materials, manufacturing processes, finishes and tolerances-Size and weight:

Operating characteristics, including time and load:

Auxiliary components:

Structuraf integrity:

Qualification parameters:

Desion margins:

COD-213 SARGENT&LUNDY

' emen.seme- Page 3 of 4

a: e - n

__m- ,3 g Page a-9 Final 1 Pro):ct No.: ,. File No.: COD. Revision' g

Mounting requirements:

Power supply-Other:

C 8. Determination of quellfled life. The model must demonstrate that the equipment performance exceeds requirements for an environment a; severe as that anticipated in service.

O Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments C9. Maintenance. A desenption of periodic maintenance and replacement requirements.

C Yes O No O Not Applicable Comments D. COMMENTS l I l

E. TYPE TESTING AND OPERATING EXPERIENCE If the method of qualification (Section B, Form MAS-COD-2.3) involves type testing or operating experience, complete sections F, G and I of Form MAS-COD-2.3.

~

SAR3ENThLUNDY l " * ****"*- Page 4 of 4 j

SARGENT & LUNDY GLOSSARY A pendix C R :. VISION 1 (7 . 4/5lg5 Page C-1 L) Fmal 1

Potential Observation - A condition wherein the reviewer believes there may be a failure to 1

meet licensing commitments or other safety-related design requirements.

Observation - A condition wherein the IDVP Internal Review Committee believes there may be a failure to meet licensing commitments or other safety-related design requirements.

Potential Observation Report (POR)- A preliminary internal report for the documentation of an Observation.

Observation Report (OR)-Internal Review Committee documentation of its evaluation of an Observation.

Resolution Report - Documentation of the resolution of an Observation.

Completion Report - Documentation of action taken (disposition) to complete the review ef fort associated with an Observation.

Potentially Safety-Significant Observation - A condition believed to possibly exist which may 1 result in a loss of safety function to the extent that there may be a major reduction in the (3 degree of protection provided to public health and safety.

'%)

Safety-Significant Condition - A condition confirmed to exist which results in a loss of safety function to the extent that there is a major reduction in the degree of protection provided to public health and safety.

Internal Review Committee - A committee made up of the Engineering Design Directors and key IDVP team members.

Senior Review Committee - A committee made up of senior members of Sargent & Lundy who are not part of the IDVP team.

f l

I")

V

SARGENT S LUNDY HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Appendix D INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM REVISION 1 CRITERIA FOR SYSTEM SELECTION 4/3/g3

[~] Page D-1 V' Final y

The Systems selected to be reviewed in the Hope Creek Independent Design Verification Program were chosen considering the following criteria:

1. The system must be safety-related.

2. The system should involve a cross-section of engineering and design disciplines within the Bechtel Power Corporation.

3. The concept and implementation of the system design shculd be by Bechtel Power -

Corporation.

4. The system should be reasonably complex. requiring several modes of operation involving redundancy and single failure considerations.

5. The system should involve interfaces with General Electric and/or others.

6. The system should have required design changes over the plant design period.

7. The system should include new or unique design features.

}/]

v It is recognized that each of the systems selected may not encompass all of the above criteria. However, by choosing a number of dif ferent systems for review, it is intended that the above criteria be covered.

'v'