ML20112G370

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amends Response to NRC Ltr Re Unresolved Item Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/84-68.Corrective Actions:Fsar Figures 7.3-10, Sheets 1,2 & 3 Will Be Revised to Reflect Implementation of Fmr S-1109
ML20112G370
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/01/1985
From: Jens W
DETROIT EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
EF2-70448, NUDOCS 8504010086
Download: ML20112G370 (4)


Text

7

.. 4 s

. t Coyne H. ,hs -

Veo President Nuclear Operations kh ( , 6400 North Drxne Hghway Newport, Mchgan 48166

< i j sam 0 March 1, 1985 EF2-70448 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road

-Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Dear Mr. Keppler:

Reference:

(1) Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 (2) Letter, W. H. Jens to J. G. Keppler, February 22, 1985, EF2-70400

Subject:

Detroit Edison Amended Response Unresolved Item 50-341/84-68-02 This letter amends Detroit Edison's response to Unresolved Item 50-341/84-68-02. The changes to the previous response, Reference 3,_are. identified by a revision bar in the right hand margin. .

We trust _this letter satisfactorily responds to the unresolved issue: cited in the inspection report. If you have' questions regarding this matter, please. contact Mr.-Lewis Bregni, (313) 586-5083.

Sincerel ,

f M }b l

V cc: P. M.. Byron R. C. Knop C. C. Williams

~ U.S. NRC Document-Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

~

M 1o "oeg 8l8oo 30 ( '

8 PDR SAR 8M

, 40/h

~

~'

~

s , ,~

t

!- ,) ,

.1

.i ,

e'%

A a

?

r THE. DETROIT EDISON COMPANY FERMI-2 NUCLEAR; OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION RESPONSE TO-NRC UNRESOLVED ITEM NO. 50-341/84-68-02

-, DOCKET NO. 50-341 LICENSE NO. CPPR-87 p INS'PECTION AT: FERMI 2, NEWPORT, MICHIGAN INSPECTION CONDUCTED: . DECEMBER 19-20, 1984

< . JANUARY 3-5, 1985 JANUARY 10-12,_1985 9

1.-

l

+

f

4 ,

j' -

^

p S s

-R'ESPONSE~TO.NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-341/84-68 UNRESOLVED ITEM- 84-68-02 1&un l inspector reviewed P&ID 6M721-2089,' Revision K, and

~

~

other. electrical drawings (discussed below) and observed the followingLdiscrepancies:

f -(l)- Fermi 12.FSAR figuresi7.3-10' sheets 1,_2, and 3 do not

. appear.to reflect the-implementation of FMR.S-1109

' dated. March 115, 1979.

2

'(2).'It appears that the correc.t reactor low water level

' interlocks are not used -in the MSIV . isolation . logic (Ref.Jdrawin's[6I721'-2095-141&

g 15,: Revision C).

. ..(3) xColor/ code discrepancies. exist between the drawings 1 listed;in-the; brackets., (6I721-21-16

.;[ sic-6I721-2155-16] and'17, Revision C, and

'(Ref.

26I721-2282-55, 60, 65, an'd 70, Revision F. )

3 DCP-B2100-IO5 .and . IO6, - IDCN-442, IRMR-1087 ~ and DCN-5990.') . It appears.that some of theireferenced j ,

design change documents we're not properly and completely: implemented.'

RESPONSEJTO UNRESOLVED ITEM 84-68-02 (1) _ Detroit _ Edison made an effort;to keep the FSAR updated

during-the_ construction phase. .FSAR Figure 7.3-10, sheets 1, 2, and 3,'" Nuclear Boiler System FCD" are

-  : covered under/ Interfacing Procedure' 11.000.121, "FSAR f- . and1ER Amendments."This-procedure.provides for1 annual

~

s updates of the FSAR_beginning two years after~the

. Typically, however, there.

~

operatingLlicense_is issued.

> l- ?is a1significant. delay in the inco'rporation of-changes into.FSAR-drawings issued:and> maintained by General Electric if'the change-is,not initiated by GE. .This is the case with FMR S-1109. To' alleviate this problem,

~ Detroit Edison will;obtain the mylars for these drawings and will maintain these. drawings 1 internally.

The revised drawings willLbe annotated to show that-the

~?GE issued drawings are'being maintained _by-Detroit Edison.- FSAR Figure 7.3-10:is being revised,by 3

=;y 'FCN-84-579 which is scheduled.to be incorporated by

~

VJ ,  ? July,.1986.

=

h.

v ii<,--  !. y r . . +-

}' _

W} - ,

5. ,8 s '

~~;  ;

, .g m s c 4,  : , ,

+

'  ?

, 12  :

+

-' RESPONSE TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-341/84-68

.'  : RESPONSE TO' UNRESOLVED ITEM 84-68-02 (Continued) 51 0,; , ,

. (2); Th'e: Inspector reviewed Revision C of drawings-

. 26I721-2095-14 and 15. Revision F was effective at

theitime'of thexinspection. Detroit Edison has not1been.able'to determine how
the inspector was M

g

[> ' supplied'with the superceded drawing.

J- . ETheidesign shown'on' Revision C utilized C71A-KlA

- contacts luand 2 -(water : level :2) in .the interlock

' circuit. : Revision F,.which was in1effect at the time R4 .

, Tof-inspection,:shows:a: design that1 utilizes relay e" .

< - ~ C71A-K260Ac-contacts.(water level 1);in'the. interlock 7l . circuit. The signal for the C71A-K260A contacts -is supplied by;a' wide range. level _ transmitter (B21-N081A).

p- . x: }which is capable of and does'supplylsignals for relays F. #

activated by both reactor waterclevels:1 and 2.- The

, , reactor low water slevel interlocks 1shown on Revision- F s of' drawing _ 6I721-2095-14 and 15 are. correct.s u -

+

x ',

l(3)TheJinspectorsl observations concerning color. code

discrepancies are correct. These'particular color code.

fv

- ;discrepanc'ies exist because,an acceptable alt'ernate

^

g'.

~

-cable type =was used due'to material ~ availability when

~

In;this' case,'. Cable Code s the' cables were installed.

M, No.K119 was; substituted for-No. 111. DCN-5990, which -

~

L. documented the change,. corrected the cable color on-the u- Lpull.cardiand. wiring ~ diagrams;6I721-2282-55, 60'andi70,~

l. but failed;to change >the color'on schematics

- t' :6I721-2155216 and 17.- This_errorawas' corrected on- -

7 - -

. Revision D~ of the schematic.exceptsfor: 2 cables which -

, were again overlookedi

- ' s 1 Cable. color.doesLnot affect the function of the

'~. circuit;:however,.it:could have led to-confusion 1on the

~

,p Wl /'

'part"of: maintenance.or' operations. personnel. In' accordance with-theLelectrical and IEC as-built

[' program,xa; Deviation / Event' Report (DER) was-used to

~

Y

' ,* ~

_ jdocumentithis discrepancy.. This DER will be' posted l'

  • against the' drawing to: prevent confusion until the y >

^drawingLis updated.

L , .

x <

y@q*

?

U, e

b _

( >[,

(

,- s - ~~

p.. 1

_'_.