ML20112G349

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-247/84-13 & 50-247/84-22 & Order Modifying License DPR-26.Radiation Protection Oversight Committee Monthly Rept for Jan 1985 Encl
ML20112G349
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point 
Issue date: 02/25/1985
From: Otoole J
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC.
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 8504010075
Download: ML20112G349 (5)


Text

&w f.:y *

,3;

]

(-

John D. Gioole W --

.l ! V:'ce Pramt -

m-

- I

' ConsoMated Edison Company of New York. Inc.

Li. Q l-

- 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003 '

.,, - > _~ i J i

'~)t+

' Telephone (212) 460-2533 i

February 25, 1985 Re

' Indian Point Unit No. 2 4

Docket No. 50-247 Dr. Thomes E. Murley Regional Administrator

~

U. 8. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue

- King of~ Prussia, Pa. 19406

Dear Dr. Murley:

4 This refers.to the Notice of Violation (NRC Inspection Nos. 50-247/84-13 and.'50-247/84-22) and Order Modifying License, transmitted with - your

'8eptember 27,:1984 letter.

s Provided herewith an Attachment A, in the monthly report of the Radiation Protection Oversight Committee.

All observations identified in this report have been reviewed.and an appropriate, corrective action has been initiated.

. Should you or your staff have any quantions, please contact us.

I' Ve truly yours,

'i I

[$4 U

o attach.

~

cc Mr. James Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. 8. Nuclear Regulatory Cousinnion N

washington, D. C 20555 Senior Resident Inspector U. 8. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 38 auchanan, New York 10511 1

7 l

l D{

_ n_

,e,

.g Attachnent #1 GENERAL PHYSICS CORPORATION 10630 lllCKOR Y RfDGE ROAD COLUMBIA, MAR YLAND 21044 301 964 6000-301 932 1240 February 6, 1985 GP-L-211314 Mr. Murray Selman Vice President, Nuclear Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Indian Point Station Broadway and Bleakley Avenue Buchanan, New York 10511

Dear Mr. Selman:

Attached is the first monthly report of the Radiation Protection Oversight committee. This report is based on the Committee's activities and deliberations through January 30, 1985.

An additional copy of the report is enclosed for you to transmit to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regional Administrator, Region I, in accordance with the Committee Charter.

Very truly yours, G

b RPORATION

\\

Joyc P.

avis Cha an JPD:did cc Committee Members Executive Vice President, Central Operations Chairman, NFSC General Managers - Nuclear Power Committee Files

h.

+

A n"if y V 11

^ " *..,

m.,'

- i

- y a

~~

'. Indica Point-

-Rcdiction Protoction Ovorsight Caccittoo.

1

-,4

Report to.the V1'ce~ President. Nu'elear Power;Jfo'r January 1985 I

-January 30, 1985.

LTherfo11owing report covers the.first two meeting sessions of the 0versight' Committee in December 1984 and January 1985

'i lPait 1 -LCommittee Activities

' FULL 1 COMMITTEE December'1984

The committee met on' December 19, 1984.

This was the initial organizational meeting.. The maj or Committee' activities

- included::

1.

. Introductions and organizational activities.

"2.

Discussion of plans for and current status of the

_ upgrade, activities for the Radiation Program vith

' Michael-Miele, General Manager. Environmental Health &

Safety'(EHaS),_and Peter Collopy, consultant.

' January 1985 v

The committee met.for two days January 29-30, 1985, at the

-Corporate. Offices of Con Edison at ~4 Irving Place, New York.

iThe. major Committee activities included:

~1.

Discussion of the-modus operandi for the Committee,

.its plans and meeting schedule.

-2.

Report of the ad hoc Subcommittees (see below) and

~ discussion of their report findings.

+

3.

Discussion with John Cullen on the activities of the

' Committee's Rad. Assessor and'his findings.

4.-

Discussion with Neal Hartasan, Quality Assurance (QA)

Auditor on the Radiological Audit program and his findings and concerns.

5.

Discussion with John Grob of Central Engineering on

the role of Central Engineering in ALARA and radiation

?

protection.

I

+

1 I

r

=.

gR:

u.

p a

q;c.y gd;;.W l**;
gq

'x M

=

. ROC Report for January 1985

+

7 s

6.

Discussion with' John Nutant,' Chairman,. Radiation'

Safety Sub-Committee (RSSC) and acting. chairman,

~

s

~

LNuclearLFacilities Safety Committee,

"~

~

and Walter Stein,-

' Secretary, Nuclear Facilities Safety Committee _(NFSC),

3 on the-structure and activities.of those committees.

I ISUSCOMMITTEE' REPORTS-i

'1'. J L Ad ~Boc' Sub-Committee on Rad Assessor Activities

'Onhanuary-21, 1985,;Sub-committee 1 members T.'Peterson and

'J r iW.VS teim ' met /with : the 1 Committee's Rad. Assessor, J. Cullen.

'atGIndian-Point? Station.~. Suggestions for Committee involvemenetin the Radiation Protection Program upgrade and thezrole of1 the assessor were discussed and developed for s

full Committee consideration.

q On_Januaryf 22.-1985,- Sub-committee members P.

Freudenthal and T.

Peterson,1with J. Cullen, the Rad. Assessor, met to

~look:into;several areas relating to the upgrade, including items 11dentified by the' Assessor during his' assessment

<cactivities:ststhe facility.

e 2..

Ad.Ho'c'Sub-Committee on Training OnfJanuAry 22,_1985, Sub-committee members.P. Freudenthal
and T.iPetersonivisited: the Training facility at Toddv111e School. DThey met'with-A. Ferraro and his' instructors to discuss the status lof plans for' training workers in thel

!4 upgraded / program.

t Part II -[CommitteerFindings

'The committee:has'the following' observations.to bring to Lthe: attention of the Vice Prosident, Nuclear. Power, based on its>

-activities'through January 30,'1985.

1.

$1tEsppears that many shortcomings of the Radiation Safety! Program,-identified by_the QA Auditor, have.not

' been reflecte'd :in : formal Audit ~ Reports.- The Committee

._^

~

' believes that'it would be. helpful for management'to Lhave'this information.

2.

LAs-aLresult of its review of the progress being made-andLehe quality of the actions being'taken~to

implement the11mproved Radiation' Protection' Program, t's Committee' believes'that-there is evidence that at 31 east some.of~the people involved in the upgrade

_ program.may notJappreciate the< significance and 2

urgency of the program'being undertaken.. This*

evidence includest 2

y

he tM y, eh 0

~

c

sf M W A r y

,9,-

.' N

~

s

.J.m

~'

.[y t

g

'}'

6 1. ROC Report"for). January 1985 j'

Je 4

7

-v h'

~

la)[

Missed 7 milestone;date-for interim procedure-C'"'

issuanceh M

' E

.b).

Poor.._. coordination between.EH&S and: Training 1

relative;to program changes and the. significance i

j

-of'the, changes.

wm.

.w.

J c)-

Failuredto carry out'certain committed tasks in a

- t i m e l y ; m a'a n e r.

-3..

'Although'it is-notEwithin their specific respons-'

q

~ibility,= reducing l radiation exposures ~ appears to.

be'oneiof'thatfactors considered by-Central 7

Engineering;in designing modifications to the-

.IndianiPoint plant.

It'would~be helpful,-in this regard..~to have.available to the engineers, current, s,

reliable ~information on radiation levels inia 11 areas within,the' plant. LCentral Engineering's< role in the

. program upgrade,will;be the subject of further review:

by.the. Committee'.

14. -

The Committee believes that, to be successful-the upgraded Radiati~on Protection'. Program requires r commitment and-involvement at:a11' levels within-the

. Company.. So far, the bulk of. Program-implementation efforts have been within'the Indian Point EH&S Department;'however, all organizations ~with responsibilities relating toLthe Indian Point facility G

.should be similar1yrinvolved.

e, u

._.A d o p t e d b y b ;-' ation.Protectior4' Oversight Committee February 1985 o

J.fP.JDavis N e1 $ Y x

'a

NOTE
-The Minutes of,each Committee' meeting will be available in Committee' files ~afterftheir: adoption at the" subsequent

' regular monthly-meeting of the Committee.

)

d c

\\

I'

+

i <

r-L 3

[',