ML20112E352
| ML20112E352 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 01/04/1985 |
| From: | Woolever E DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20112E355 | List: |
| References | |
| 2NRC-5-002, 2NRC-5-2, NUDOCS 8501150108 | |
| Download: ML20112E352 (3) | |
Text
W
$VL
'Af Duquestie Lidit 2 = g p2
- 2) 92M960 Nuclear Construction Division ec W
- 2) 78b2629 Robinson Plaza, Building 2. Suite 210 Pittsburgh, PA 15205 January 4, 1985 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:
Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch 3 Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412 Response to Outstanding Issue in Draf t SER 8.3.3.3.6 Electrical Separation - Test Plan Submittal Gentlemen:
During our December 14, 1984 mee t ing with staff personnel in agreed to formally submit the enclosed Test Plan (enclosure #1)
Bethesda, we and related information (enclosure #2).
Enclosure #1 is a copy of the Test Plan, ESS0W 2BVS-843, approved October 5,1984 and marked December 27, 1984.
The ESS0W has been marked to reflect approved ch ange s that have been made since its initial approval on October 5,1984.
Enclosure #2 consists of an index and six (6) sketches that correlate test configurations, from 2BVS-843 to separation details that will be demonstrated as acceptable based upon our test program results.
During our September 26, 1984 meeting in Bethesda with NRR Staf f and Region I personnel, preliminary copies of both enclosures 1 and 2 were discussed in detail and copies were lef t for your review.
We also discussed I at the September 26 meeting, the detailed methods we proposed to utilize to justify the acceptability of other sept. ration details without testing.
Our submittal 2NRC-4-170, dated October 16, 1984, did not include the information in Enclosures 1 and 2 since we agreed at our September 26 only to submit those configurations that were acceptable without testing.
Therefore, our October 16 submittal contained only the configurations and justifications for separation details that are acceptable without tests or have been found acceptable based on similar justification on other dockets.
D 8 000104 E
0500041g PDit hj
r United States Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Page 2 We look forward to your earliest pos sible review of the enclosed information since, as we discussed at both the September 26 and the December 14 meetings, our Test Program tests are scheduled to be completed by the end of January 1985.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY By E yJ. "Woolever Vice President HMS/ caw Attachments Mr. R. DeYoung, Director (3) (w/a) cc:
Mr. B. K. Singh, Project Manager (w/a)
Mr. G. Walton, NRC Resident Inspector (w/a)
SUBSCRIBED AND S ORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 19 d g//'/ DAY OF
.my/
2 Notary Public Ah4TA ELAINE REITER, fJOTARY PUBLIC ROBINSON TOV /NSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY MY COMMISS!ON EXPIRES OCTOBER 20,1986 i_
Unitsd Stctsa Nuclear Rsgu1& tory Commission Mr. Giorge W. Knighton, Chief Page 3 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA )
)
SS:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
)
On this day of ggu///
/ffs, before me, a
said [ommonwealt( and County, personally appe ared Notary Public' in and for E. J. Woolever, who being duly sworn, deposed and said that (1) he is Vice President of Duquesne Light, (2).he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing Submittal on behalf of said Company, and (3) the statements forth in the Submittal are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, set h
Notary Public ANITA ELAINE REITER. NOTARY PUBLIC-ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXP!RES OCTOBER 20,1986 e