ML20112B016

Forwards Applicant Motion for Summary Disposition on Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power Contention 4. Adoption of Listed Schedule for Response Requested

ML20112B016
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	03/12/1985
From:	Silverman D HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO., NEWMAN & HOLTZINGER
To:	Bechhoefer C, Eva Hill, John Lamb Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20112B019	List: ML20112B016 ML20112B023 ML20112B035 ML20112B040
References
CON-#185-098, CON-#185-98 OL, NUDOCS 8503180562
Download: ML20112B016 (2)

Text

~.

( Q, NewMAN de llOLTZINGER, P. C 3:aETED 1615 L STRECT, N. W. Mh3C J ACn R. NEWM AN WAS H I N GTON, D. C. 2 0 0 3 6 witu AM E. sAER,JR.

JOHN E. HoLTriNGER.JR. E.GREGORv eARNES

".AIcg*((g't,Ao 202-955-6600 65 ER 18 A11 :15 a?N"a,'^='-lAall'oaa J A. souaMiGMr, JR. MERLE w. FALLON*

','fo'R7/L. lo.A. March 12, 1985 _ _ ..

E'A R.JSt""

m ATHLEEN M. SHEA b VE "CEb b b I UO OM david G. POWELL C0CAUfG & SERViCf d'%ff"^,";,,

e "O DOUGLAS G. GREEN 7%*.Nbd DEBOR AH L. HAWIUte$

m AROL LYN NEWMAN AUSON LEMASTER*

JOHN T. STOUGH, JR. HOLLY N. UNDEM AN JAMES 5.VASILE REVIN J. UPSON MICHAEL A SAUSER DAVID 5. R ASKIN ALVIN H. GUT TERM AN JANE ANYAN MEVtN P.GALLEN DON ALD J. SILVERMAN THOMAS ASCHMUtz JACOLYN A SIMMONS MICHAEL F. HE ALY *'

• JOSEPH C.STUSGS ROBERT L wHeTE

• ADM V A-Charles Bechhoefer, Esq. " O"'."/N $tANI,"UN Chairman, Administrative Judge '*"""

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. James C. Lamb, III Administrative Judge 313 Woodhaven Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Ernest E. Hill Administrative Judge Hill Associates 210 Montego Drive Danville, California 94526 Re: Houston Lighting & Power Company, et al.

South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499 E

Dear Administrative Judges:

Enclosed is Applicants' Motion for Summary Disposition on CCANP Contention Four. In its Fifth Prehearing Conference Order (November 16, 1984) at 5, the Board indicated that it would provide 5-10 days beyond the filing date set for CCANP's response to Applicants' Motion for the NRC Staff to submit its response. It also stated that if the Staff supported Applicants' Motion, CCANP would, in accordance with 10 C.F.R. S 2.749, have an additional opportunity to respond to the Staff's arguments.

Counsel for Applicants, the Staff and CCANP have agreed upon the following schedule for responses:

(1) CCANP response to Applicants' Motion to be filed by April 8 (with personal service on Staff counsel);

B503180562 850312 ADOCK 0500 98 g] gDR

, s NowwAw & Hor.TzrwonaP. C.

Charles Bechhoefer, Esq.

Dr. James C. Lamb, III Ernest E. Hill March 12, 1985 Page Two (2) Staff response due April 15 (a copy to be made available on that day for CCANP counsel); and

) (3) Should the Staff support Applicants' Motion, CCANP's further response to be filed by April 25.

In accordance with the agreement among the parties, Applicants respectfully request that the schedule described above be adopted.

Respectfully submitted,

'ra-Donald J. 11verman Counsel for Applicants Enclosure DJS:mjh cc: Service List o

4