ML20108E029
| ML20108E029 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 12/10/1984 |
| From: | Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 KMLNRC-84-225, NUDOCS 8412140119 | |
| Download: ML20108E029 (19) | |
Text
.r KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE ELECTAC COMPANY
@LENN LMOESTER vsCE Pessacasef huCLeam December 10, 1984 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 KMLNRC 84-225 Re:
Docket No. STN 50-482 Ref: 1) Letter KMLNRC 83-051 dated April 29, 1983 from GLKoester, KG&E, to HRDenton, NRC
- 2) Letter KMLNRC 83-148 dated November 21, 1983 from GLKoester, KG&E, to HRDenton, NRC Subj: Additional information for the Review of the Wolf Creek Emergency Plan
Dear Mr. Denton:
The two References provided information concerning personnel response capability during emergency situations at Wolf Creek.
Discussions with your staff revealed changes to question B.4 were necessary to more fully explain the staffing goals of KG&E as they relate to NUREG-0737, Supplement No. 1.
The information contained in this letter combines and supersedes the information contained in the two Referenced letters. Attached also is the response to a verbal question by your staff concerning the coordination of protective action recommendations between KG&E, Coffey County and the State of Kansas.
The attached will be reflected in the next revision of the Wolf Creek Emergency Plan.
Yours very truly, gh GLK:bb Attach xc:PO'Connor (2), w/a HBundy, w/a 8412140119 841210 PDR ADOCK 05000482 Q&
F PDR 8li 201 N. Market -WocNta, Kansas - Men Address: RO. Box 208 l Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 261-6451
5-OATH OF AFFIRMATION STATE OF KANSAS
)
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
I, Glenn L. Koester, of lawful age, being duly sworn upon oath, - do depose, state and affirm that I am Vice President - Nuclear of Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, that I 'have signed -the foregoing letter of transmittal, know the contents thereof, and that all statements contained therein are true.
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTEST:
By
,1t) j' Gfenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear E.D. Prothro, Assistant Secretary
-4 STATE OF KANSAS
)
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
4 BE IT REMEMBERED that on this 10th day of December, 1984
', before me, Evelyn L. Fry, a Notary, perronally appeared Glenn L. Koester, Vice President - Nuclear of KLnsas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, who is personally known to me and who executed the foregoing instrument, and he duly acknowledged the execution of the same for and on behalf of and as the act and deed of said corporation.
,,,,,,,,IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the gddate,,and year above written.
';)\\
p S
-lf 1
Mgw
/
1 1, 'n n~.
- ' f3
['5velyng. Fry, Nota 7
ty e,
,*s,-
MConnission expires on August 15, 1985.'
.I e
Attachment I to 1.
KMLNRC 84-225 Q.B.4 The minimum ' staffing requirements, found 'in Table 1.1-1 of the plan,- should either. conform = to Table B-1 of NUREG-0654 or provide alternative means of performing the required functions in a timely manner (B.5).
-R.B.4 The question was directed to conformance to ' Table B-1 of NUREG-0654.
NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 Table 2 has since superceded the NUREG-0654 guidance and this _ response. is directed towards conformance to NUREG-0737.
In making this response, it is our understanding that NUREG-0737 is to be used as a goal and is not to be considered as providing inflexible criteria.
KG&E believes that such a policy is-particularly important in the area of emergency response manage-
~ ment where plant. location, design and organizational variations have a significant impact on the planning required.
KG&E summarizes below the influences that location, design, staffing philosophy and communica-tions have on personnel requirements needed to assure safe and reliable operations under all expect-ed conditions.
LOCATION A nuclear power plant, although usually " remote"-in location with respect to population densities, should be as accessible as possible for personnel response.
WCGS is in a uniquely rural, low popula-tion density area (13 persons per square mile _within 10 miles of the plant).
The largest city within 50 miles is Emporia with a 1078 population of - 26,000.
Ottawa is the next largest with 11,000 population in 1978.
The majority of the incorporated places within 50 miles have less than 1,000 people.
The road miles to Emporia and Ottawa from Wolf Creek are about 40 and 46 miles, respectively.
Within 5 miles of t.he site US Highway 75 intercepts the paved site access road.
Highway 75 intersects with Interstate 35 at Beto Junction about 13 miles north of the site.
WCGS is located in essentially flat farm country with a grid of county roads bordering each square mile.
Severe win'er weather could impact plant staff aug-mentation response times because of the plant's rural location.
To overcome this winter storm aspect, Wolf Creek staff will closely follow weather conditions and when severe weather threatens will hold extra personnel at the station.
With the personnel flexibility used in staffing and training, this will compensate for time access problems that might be exoerienced by severe weather conditi6ns.gmentation personnel under au
=~
k
' DESIGN WCGS is'a one-unit Westinghouse Standardized Nuclear Unit, Power Plant System -(SNUPPS) pressurized water
~ reactor located.near Burlington, Kansas.
The control Room is. ~ designed to be habitable under emergency conditions and contains the control, in-struments and communications equipment necessary for
. operation of the plant under 'both. normal and emer -
- gency- ' conditions.
The Technical Support. Center
-(TSC) is located approximately-2 minutes and 15 seconds. walking time - from the Control Room.
This location is sufficiently close to permit face-to-face interaction between the Control Room personnel and.the Duty Emergency Director when required.
l STAFFING KG&E has-been involved.in the staffing of WCGS since--
1973.
Staffing for WCGS has been based on the i
following:
1.
The quality of, personnel has been a primary objective of the Wolf Creek recruitment effort and the. plant staff has been carefully selected by use of ' oral and written examinations.
This has fostered the development of a -capable, well-trained staff whose efficiency.is depend-ent upon their ' compactness.
An emergency situation capitalizes upon this characteristic as it -has 'been. demonstrated that 'small, closely coordinated teams are_ more responsive _than large groups. of people.
Across the board, numbers of personnel and~ specific arrivalitimes-L may be an acceptable model for providing gen-eral guidance, however it ~is felt that use of
!~
fewer personnel, appropriately trained-and given the necessary authority-to act represents an alternative which is just as valid and more efficient.
l
- 2.
Nuclear plant supervisors are technically and physically skilled in the. work they supervise.
i A1]
WCGS Section Supervisors and supporting supervisors are skilled people who, in many cases, are more craf t skilled than the craf ts-
. men they supervise.
These Section Supervisors and supporting. supervisors have had extensive
" hands on" experience and keep current by l
continuous and direct operational involvement.
,.-~..._,_-,,,.r
I L
-1.
L
' 3..
A-rigorous Call Superintendent' system is-insti-tuted _.at WCGS.
The Call. Superintendent -is A
available by. multiple means of communication.
Two thirds L of these individuals live within 30 minutes of the plant and'all within 60 minutes.
This proven system, such:as that in use at.the
- Point Beach Nuclear Plant, ' has - been used ' suc-cessfully to provide backshift supervisors with.
access to more senior persennel should the need arise for consultation.-
T ae Call Superinten-dent is then available to become the DED.
Table Q.B.4-1 lists ' the.. responsibilities 'of the Call-Superintendent.
4.
Key technical and operational support depart-ments of a nuclear power plant should have a duty roster-to maintain a senior person of that speciality for consultation and -call out.
The WCGS Maintenance, Chemistry, Health Physics and Instrument and Control Groups, all-have rigor-ous duty rosters.
The duty person is committed to immediate telephone availability and/or carries a telephone pager and is required to.
arrive at the plant within thirty or sixty minutes.
5.
Motivation of nuclear power plant personnel should be kept at a high. level.
Keeping the motivation of shift-assigned personnel at a high level. is a difficult challenge, and par-ticularly ~ so if shift personnel do not have meaningful work assignments..
Therefore, WCGS has optomized the number of shift workers, and made their-shift ork variable andcompre-w hensive by multiple function duties.
For
- instance, each Nuclear Station' Operator-is trained and qualifed for watch standing at all Nuclear Station Operator stations and in'addi-tion is trained and qualified to perform cer-tain chemical analysis work, normal and 'emer-gency health physics work, minor mechanical and-electrical maintenance, and radwaste processing and packaging.
Other examples of flexible -use of shift personnel are that the Duty Shift-Supervisor and Supervising Operator change some assignments and Reactor Operators " work down" routinely as Nuclear Station Operators.
e w
e 7.
- The - Shif t Supervisor should not have excessive ~
administrative duties ~. 'KG&E's shift ^ complement was reviewed by the _ NRC's Management Structure" and Technical Resources Review -Team in January 1982 to - the Table B-1z requirements.
KG&E com-mitted.. in ' letter KMLNRC 82-165 - (dated 2/25/82) to : a,10-man shift complement to document com-mitments made_ verbally to'the-Review Team.
~ he T
- Team ~ was - made up of : individuals. from NRR and
< Region IV.
COMMUNICATIONS'AND-AUGMENTATION Nuclear power. plant communications - should be reli-able,: simple and -automated when possible..
Wolf---
Creek -has more than. four dozen outside telephone ~
trunk lines, eight intercompany lines,. intra-plant voice -lines which include over' 250 -telephone ex--
tensions, intra-plant radios on two channels, and an area radio system ~of _ portable and auto-mounted radios covering all of' the' effective EPZ - which in.
cludes Coffey County.
A. rapid alert Notifica-tion-System for ' the purpose.of.an automated and immediate notification of key and support emergency.
personnel has -been procurred and is in -the process of being programmed.
The NRC Emergency Notification
. System plus our radio backups ' to. the County. Sheriff and State provides communications _ capability for the alerting of regulatory agencies and the community in a
most straight-forward. manner and without requiring extensive effort.
The WCGS Call Superintendent'is-provided with a Call Superintendent radio equipped vehicle during.the period of time he has the duty.
This allows him to i
maintain contact with WCGS during ' call' ins back to D'
the ~ plant.
Additionally, the-Call Superintendent carries a' voice-tone pager.
l-Attachei is a list showing - home locations of ~ key.
l plant personnel' who 'might be needed for augmentation (Table Q.B.4-2).
The general proximity of homes to the; plant site is, we believe, an important_ factor.
NUREG-0737 SUPPLEMENT 1 TABLE _2 COMPARISON i
Table _. Q. B. 4-3 summarizes how each major functional area of NUREG-0737 ' Supplement.1 Table 2 will be implemented at WCGS.
Attachment 1,
" Augmentation" shows the NUREG-0737 suggested 30 minute capability by major functional
- area, and those numbers of r.
3
+
-...,-4 e
q
.c n'.
trained: WCGS. Jpersonnel who live within 30 minutes.
of. the site.
The 30 minute " goal" for. augmentation is to cover the.six suggested functional areas with
~
eleven trained ~ personnel - as m shown - in Attachment 1.
+
KG&E will-attempt to notify all those. trained ~ per-sonnel living within 30 minutes - esf the site in an -
effort to ' meet the 30 minute " goal. "'
Recognizing.
that-.. vacations, illness, business travel, and - per-t, sonnel ' already on ' shift are factors that influence meeting this " goal," KG&E's commitment is that.at 60 minutes WCGS will have those functional areas staffed as shown in Table ~1.1-1 of the WCGS Radio-logical Emergency Response Plan, " Minimum Staffing.
Requirements for 'WCGS For Nuclear Power Plant Emergencies," shown here as Attachment 2.
SUMMARY
t.
Manpower additions of 11 and 15 personnel are re--
commended in NUREG-0737 to be accomplished in 30 and r
60
- minutes, respectively,
'after emergencies are classified.
KG&E's commitment in the Emergency Plan is to ' provide a total of 25 personnel within. one.
hour and another five within 90 minutes.
Prior to Emergency Operations Facility -(EOF) acti-vation, the functions of the EOF are performed by the TSC.
Notification and initial mobilization of l'
witn DEM arrival and EOF activation required EOF personnel occurs at the Alert classification,
- 90. minutes post-classification. of a Site Area Emer- -
gency.
Four key members of the DEM's staff are also required at 90 minutes.
Those four include' the Technical Resources Manager-.(TRM),
Radiological Assessment Manager (RAM),
Radiological Assessment Supervisor (RAS), and the EOF. Coordinator (EOFC).
Attachment 3,
" Augmentation ' at 90 Minutes," shows 4
the number of trained-personnel for each of these positions, and how many. can arrive within 60 and 90 minutes.
Personnel trained to fill the DEM and these four key positions at the EOF Will rotate be-ing "on-call" and will carry on his person a radio-U telephone " beeper" receiver if temporarily out of direct phone contact.
In addition, an attempt to notify all those personnel trained for ' emergency roles ' who are not on-call at a particular time will-j be made.
- Thus, the closest person to the site j.
arriving first will assume the emergency role until relieved by a more ' senior person.
More personnel will be trained to fill these positions.
i i
l-
] !
a It is emphasized that-KG&E believes that a competent shift organization,. backed up with ready communica-tions with senior plant staff at all times plus the capability for expeditious call-in of additional t
personnel.provides adequate assurance that WCGS will be operated in a manner which _ protects, the public health and safety.
6 4
6 4,
3 TABLE Q.B.4-1 (Sheet 1 of 3)
' CALL SUPERINTENDENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1.0 PURPOSE
.1.1 A' Call Superintendent will be _ on call' at all times to assist and counsel the Duty Shift Supervisor in the event of abnormal occurrences.
The Call Super--
intendent_ group consists of, but'is not-limited to, the Plant Manager, WCGS; Plant Support Superinten-dent, WCGS; Operations Superintendent, WCGS;=Techni-cal: Support Superintendent, WCGS; and ' Maintenance Superintendent, WCGS.
The Plant Manager may assign additional members as call Superintendents if they
~
are determined to be qualified by. the ~ Plant Manager.
2.0 QUALIFICATIONS _
' 2.1 Call, Superintendents are qualified by their past management experience or by having and maintaining an active Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) license for Wolf Creek Generating Station.
3.0 DUTIES _
3.1 A Call SuperitiLen'ent will normally be assigned the duty on a weekly basis.
A schedule of the week-by-week Call Superintendent, assignments will be dis-tributed to each Call Superintendent and to the-Con-trol Room for the Shift Supervisor's reference.
3.2 The Duty Shift Supervisor will contact and communi-cate with a Call Superintendent:
3.2.1 Before taking other than the immediate required actions. to. place or maintain the plant in a-safe-condition in the event of a reportable occurrence.
3.2.2 Prior-to deviating from any approved major procedure pertaining to nuclear safety.
3.2.3 During any condition (s) which may require the.use of an Emergency Operating Procedure.
3.2.4 At any time the station is placed in a Technical Specification Limiting Condition of Operation (LCO) action statement.
~
3.2.5 Any time the station's capability to produce elec-trical: power is jeopardized including any forced reductions in power.
TABLE Q.B.4-1 (Sheet 2 of 3) 3.2.6 In the event of any off-hour regulatory inspection by such groups 'as the USNRC,
- OSHA, State, etc.
3.2.7 In the event of any personal injury, contaminated or non-contamined, requiring offsite medical aid.
3.2.8 If. any personal or group matters occur which cannot be solved by the particular supervision and they affect the station operation.
NOTE:
The Duty Shift Supervisor will normally con-4 tact the responsible call Superintendent for the area of concern (i.e.,
the Operations Superintendent for operational
- matters, Maintenance Superintendent for maintenance matters, e tc. ).
If the normally responsible Superintendent is unavailable, or if the sit-uation demands immediate response such as implementation of the Emergency Plan or the Fire Protection Plan, the call Superintendent who has the duty will be contacted.
L3.3 The Call - Superintendent will review the circum-stances, analyze the cause, make the determination and provide approval for returning the reactor to power following a trip or an unscheduled or unex-plained power reduction.
3.4 The call Superintendent will provide counsel, call-out backup, = and advice to the Shift Supervisor as needed.
3.5 In the event of any condition requiring the imple-mentation of the WCGS Radiological Emergency Plan and implementing procedures, the call Superintendent will proceed as directed by the plan and implementing i
procedures.
J 3.6 In the event of a fire at WCGS, the Call Superin-tendent will be notified and will proceed as direct-ed in the Fire Protection Plan.
3.7 The Call Superintendent will keep the Plant Manager informed of any occurrence, unusual events or problems during his scheduled period.
TABLE Q.B.4-1 (Sheet 3 of 3) 4.0 CONDUCT
'4.1 The-scheduled Call Superintendent will keep the Duty Shift Supervisor informed of his whereabouts at all times or will carry on his person a radio-telephone
" beeper" receiver if temporarily out of' direct phone contact.
4.2 The ' Call Superintendent must be -immediately avail-able, by phone or - radio, to the" Duty Shif t Super-visor - for consultation and/or able to leave for the plant if required.
The only exception to immediate availability is the normal driving time between his place of residence and-the station.
4.3 If necessary, a substitute Call ' Superintendent can assume the duty for short periods.of time, as long as the control Room is notified, and the substitute is a qualified Call Superintendent.
I-
[
I f
i, y.-
4 R
TABLE ~ Q.B. 4-2 (Sheet 1.of 5) l
~
COMPARISON TO NUREG-0737 SUPPLEMENT 1-TABLE 2 ON SHIFT, MAJOR FUNCTI0t&L AREA MXE RESPONSE 1.7 Plant Operations and Assessment on Shift:-
of Operational Aspects 1 Shift Supervisor (SIC) 1 Supervising Operator (SRO) 2 Reactor Operators (RO)'
4 Nuclear Station Operators (150) 2.
Snergency Direction and control Duty Bnergency Director (Shift Supervisor ** until relieved by Plant Manager.
or call Superintendent.
Overall direction to be assuned by the Duty Bnergency k nager d en the Bnergency Operations Facility is activated. Direction of plant operations remains with the. Duty-Bnergency Director).
3.
. Notification /Cmmunication Control Room Comunicator l
(may be trovidal by shift -
personnel assigned to other
- locations)
~4..
. Radiological Accident Assessment and Support of Operational Accident Assessment L
2a.
BT Director Duty Bastgency knager once EOF is activated b.
Offsite Dose Assessment HP personnel or qualified operators c.
Offsite surveys, onsite HP personnel or qualified (out-of-plant) Inplant surveys operators
~
d.
Chenistry/Radiochenistry Chanistry/HP personnel or i
qualified operators f
At WCGS the Shift Supervisor initially assunes the responsiblities and position of DED until relieved by the Plant Manager or Call l
l Superintendent. Additionally, Shift Supervisors and Supervising Operators are qualified to the STA level.
t k
m TABLE Q.B.4 (Sheet 2 of 5) l B9L70R FUNCTIONAL AREA WCGS RESPOtEE
- 5. -
Plant Systen Engineering, Repair.
and Corrective Actions a.
'thchnical Support See'2 above b.
Repair and Corrective Actions
- 1.
Mechanical Maintenance /
One of on-shift NSOs can RadWaste Operator perform function until.
magmentation.
2.'
Electrical Maintenance A licensed RO or one MiO on-shift can perfoon function until augmentation.'
6.
Protective Actions (Inplant) a.
Access Omtrol HP persmnel.aM qualified '
Mios and Chenistry personnel on-shift
- b.. HP coverage for repair, corrective actions, search anxi rescue, first aid and fire fighting c.- Personnel monitoring d.
Dosimetry 7.
Firefighting WOGS fire brigade is defined in the Technical Specifications, i
8.
Rescue Operations and First Aid Many operating shi.ft personnel and Security personnel are-
. qualified in first aid and i
fire fighting.
9.
Site Access Control and Security Plan provides suffi-Personnel Accountability cient personnel as approved by the NRC.
i
)-
-ATI%CHMFNP 1 (Sheet 3 of 5)
AtXMNFATION
- TRAINED NURECH)737 WITHIN 30 SUGGESTED 30 MINtJFES CF MAJOR FUNCTIONAL AREA MINUPE CAPABILITY MXE 1.
fbtification/ Communications 1
4 2.
Senior Health Physics (HP) 1 2
Expertise 3.
a.
Offsite Surveys, onsite 4
9 (out-of-plant), inplant surveys.
b.
Chemistry / Radiochemistry 0
3 4.
Technical Support 1
4 5.
Repair and Corrective Action 2
7 6.
Radiation Protection 2
5 7.
.Firefighting Iocal rapport arrangements have been made with the City of Burlington Fire Department.
8.
Rescue Operations and First Aid Iocal support for arrangements have been made with the Coffey County Ambulance Service.
Total 11 34 1
6
f g
.e E.
ATTACHMENT 2-($heet 4 of 5)
TA8LE-1.1-1 MINIMUM STAFFING REQUIREMENTS FOR WCGS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCIES Position Title On Capability for Additions
- , Major Functional Area Major Tasks or Expertise Shift I hour 90 minutes Plant Operations and Shift Supervisor (SRO) 1 Assessment of Operational Supervising Operator (SRO) 1 Aspects Reactor Operator (RO) 2 Nuclear Station Operator 4
Emergency Of rection and Duty Emergency Director 1**
Contro1*
(Shift Supervisor until relieved)
Notification /Comunication Notify Itcensee. State Emergency Comunicator 1**
3 local and Federal personnel and maintain comunfcatIon
~ Radiological Accident Emergency Operations DEM and staff 5
Assessment and Support Facility (EOF) Director of Operational Accident Offsite Dose
$r Health Physics (HP)
Assessment Assessmerit Expertise 1
Office Surveys 4
Onsite (out-of-plant) 2 In-plant surveys.
HP Personnel 1
2 Chemistry / Radio Chem Personnel 1
1 chemistry Plant System Technical Support Shift Technical Advisor 1**
Engineering Repair Core / Thermal Hydraulfes 1
and Corrective Actions Electrical 1
Mechanical 1
Repair and Corrective Mechnical Maintenance /
1" 1
Actions Radwaste Operator 1
Electrical Maintenance /
1" 2
Instrument and Control
(!&C) Technician 1
Protective Actions Radiation Protection:
HP Personnel 1**
4 (In-Plant) a.
Access Control b.
HP Coverage for repair, corrective actfons, search and rescue first aid and firefighting c.
Personnel monitorfng d.
Oostmetry Firefighting Fire Brigade Local Support per Technical Spectfications Rescue Operations 2**
Local Support and First Afd
. Site Access Control Security, firefighting Security Personnel All per and Personnel comunications, personnel Security Plan Accountabflity accountability TOTAL IN 7T 7
- Overall direction of factlety response to be assumed by the Duty Emergency Manager when all centers are fully manned.
However, minute-by-minute direction of factitty operations remains with the DED.
- May be provided by shift personnel assigned to other locations.
ATTACHMENT 3 (Sheet 5 of 5)
Augmentation Within 90 Minutes Additional i Trained
1 Manager (DEM)
Technical Resources 2
1 Manager (TRM)
Radiological Assessment 1
2 Manager (RAM)
Radiological Assessment 1
0 Supervisor (RAS)
EOF Coordinator 2
0 (EOFC) 1 l
I
. E. -
AttachmentL 2 to KMLNRC 84-225-w Question KG8E was asked to explain how the protective action recommendation coordination process works for incidents at Wolf Creek.
Response
In response to an NRC question concerning protective action recommendations, KG8E, Coffey County and the State of Kansas work very closely in coordinating protective action recommendations and protective action decisions. Tables-3.0-1, 3.0-2, 3.0-3, 3.0-4 and 3.0-5 of the WCGS Radiological Emergency Response Plan are taken directly out of the State of Kansas Protective Action Guides. These guides are also found in Appendix GG of the State Disaster Emergency Plan and Appendix E to the Coffey County Contingency Plan for Incidents Involving Commercial Nuclear Power. The Dety Emergency Director, and later the Duty Emergency Manager, make protective action recommendations to the County and State based on these Protective Action Guides. The County and State then make and implement their protective action decisions based on information received from WCGS and the Protective Action Guides.
m
een KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Bos 208 Wachsta, Kansas 6720) v nacra,e c-=,
April 29, 1983 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consnission Washington, D.C.
20555
]
$KHLNRC~83-051 Ret Docket No. STN 50-482 Ref: 1) Letter dated 12/6/82 from BJYoungblood, NRC, to GLKoeater, KGE J
- 2) Letter KMLNPC 83-002 dated 1/12/83 from GLKoester, KGE, to HRDenton, NRC Subj: Additional Information for the Review of the Wolf Creek Emergency Plan m
Dear Mr. Denton:
Reference 1) requested additional information concerning the Wolf Creek
)
Generating Station Emergency Plan. Reference 2) provided responses to y
the informational requests.
Discussions with your staff had revealed that the staff felt KGE's response to question B.4 concerning plant personnel response capability during emergency situations to be inadequate. This subject was one item of discussion during a meeting with your staff held on March 23, 1983.
Attached is a revised response to question B.4 which addresses the staffing goals of NUREG-0737 Suppler.ent 1.
\\/
The attached infortnation will be formally incorporated into the Wolf Creek FSAR in Revision 10. The information is hereby incorporated into the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit No.1, Operating License Application.
l Yours very truly, original Signed GLENN L. K0 ESTER i
GLKabb Attach cc JHolonich (2)
HRoberds/WSchum l
)
i l
Q M'Gol c Di
\\f
r F
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P 0. Bon 208 nochota, Kansas 6120!
t esscen,c cower Novernber 21 e 1983 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
'KMLNRC 83-148.
Re Docket No. STN 50-402 J
Ref: 1) KMLNRC 83-129 dated 10/10/83 from GLKoester, KGr.E, to HRDenton, NRC
- 2) KMLNRC 83-136 dated 10/21/83 from m
GLKoester, KGf.E, to IIRDenton, NRC Subj: Wolf Creek Generating Station Emergency Plan
}*
Dear Mr. Denton:
The Referenced letters 1) and 2) provided additional information concerning the Wolf Creek Generating Station Emergency Plan.
Transmitted herewith are revisions to some of the information provided by the Referenced letters.
The revised informatloa will be formally incorporated into the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit No.1, Final Safety Analysis Report in Revision 12. This information is hereby incorporated
/
into the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit No.1, operating License Application.
Yours very truly,
)
Original Signed GIIllt! L. KOCSTER GLKibb Attach cc JHolonich (2)
WSchum/ASmith eu noem y
t
.