ML20108B530

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Suffolk County Statement of Issue Questioning Whether Lilco Must Apply for Exemption from Requirements Governing Protection of Vital Equipment.Aslb Conference Call to County & State Planned for 2 Pm on 850305
ML20108B530
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 03/04/1985
From: Lanpher L
KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART
To: Bright G, Johnson E, Kelley J
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#185-899 OL-4, NUDOCS 8503070335
Download: ML20108B530 (3)


Text

-

VN

.i KIRKPATRICK'& LOCKHART i

1900 M STREET N.W.

WASHINGTOh{b,tf 20036 oNE noSTON ti. ACE MC BOSTON, MA 02:06 TELEPHONE (202) 452 7000 (ein 97F5400 D3 1428 BluCKELL AVENUE mh%ii42652 R0 :48 wwwi n ""i 0 05) 374 4i:2 ise0 ouvEn sumwo p;-

M q.g g g, 4 ',g f v @ ice 8$

rmssenow.rA isn2 i4:n n asco wrtauxarCr tm Neusea (202) 452-7011

'i4l C ;;

.e c 1;gi:.

..M *

(BY HAND)

~ ~ --

James L.

Kelley, Esq., Chairman COMT NU4iba

.gd b g Ms. Elizabeth B.

Johnson

~ PTIOD. f4 WIL FAC..

T Mr. Glenn O. Bright Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Re:

Docket No. 50-322-OL-5

Dear Administrative Judges:

I At Thursday's Confereiice of Counsel, the Board requested the parties to submit the threshold legal issue (s) to the Board by noon on March 4.

The proposed issue of Suffolk County is set forth on the attached sheet.

We are authorized to represent that the State of New York concurs in the framing of the issue.

The Board plans a conference call for 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 5, to set forth the issue (s) to be briefed.

Please place the call to the County to Mr. Miller (202/452-7022) and the call to the State to Mr. Palomino (212/587-2118).

Sincerely yours, Lawrence Coe Lanpher LCL/dk Attachment cc:

Donald Irwin, Esq. (by telecopy)

Robert Perlis, Esq. (by telecopy)

Fabian G.

Palomino, Esq. (by telecopy)

Remainder of Service List (by mail) 8503070335 850304 PDR ADOCK 05000322 G

PDR

4 STATEMENT OF ISSUE Facts-1.

In the Section 50.12 exemption proceeding, the Licensing Board relied upon both the 20 MW gas turbine and the EMD diesels'and their respective supporting systems (including fuel tanks and fuel lines, switchgear modules, cables, etc.) as constituting the alternate AC power system which would be sub-stituted for fully qualified diesels normally relied upon for compliance with GDC 17.

E.g.,

October 29 Decision, at 51, 91.

2.

In the event of a loss of all offsite power from the normal offsite grid, LILCO,would rely first upon the 20 MW gas turbine to supply power to emergency systems.

The Licensing Board found that the gas turbine could supply power in about 10 minutes.

If the gas turbine did not supply the necessary power, LILCO would then rely on-the EMD diesels; the Board found that

-these diesels could supply power in about 30 minutes.

October 29 Decision, at 88.

'3.

The 20 MW gas turbine is located in the 69 KV switch-yard about 300 feet south of the reactor building.

October 29 Decision,:at 46.

The gas turbine is not within the plant's protected' area and LILCO has not protected the gas turbine as vital equipment.

The gas turbine's power is conveyed to the

-emergency busses via the 69 KV power line and the reserve system station transformer ("RSST").

A portion of the 69 KV power line is within.the plant's protected area, but none of that line is

=

s protecte'd as vital equipment; the RSST is within the protected area, but is not protected as vital equipment.

On the reactor side of the RSST, the power from the gas turbine is carried by cables within the nonemergency switchgear room, an area which LILCO (and apparently the Staff) believe is protected as vital equipment.

The County and State do not agree that the level of protection required for vital equipment has been provided.

4.

The EMD diesels are located within the plant's pro-tected area just southwest of the reactor building.

October 29 Decision, at 47.

LILCO believes it has protected the EMD diesels and associated systems (such as cables, switchgear, etc.) in accordance with requirements for vital equipment.

The Staff' appears to agree.

The County and State do not believe that the protection of the EMD diesels, as described in the LILCO Security Plan (Attachment III to Revision 9 of Plan), complies with the requirements for vital equipment.

Issue to be Briefed Must LILCO apply, pursuant to Section 73.5, for an exemption from the requirements governing the protection of " vital equip-ment" -if either or both the gas turbine or EMD diesels, and their associated equipment, are not protected ac " vital equipment"?

i