ML20107M376
| ML20107M376 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/1984 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8503010249 | |
| Download: ML20107M376 (2) | |
Text
r- -
e
+..
9 nf TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 374ot 400 Chestnut Street Tower II 34 SEP17 A 8 : 56 September 10,' 1984 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II ATTN: James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
J Pl' ease refer to my letter to you dated July 19, 1984 which contained supplemental information for Inspection Report Nos. 50-259/84-10, 50-260/84-10, 50-296/84-10 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. Enclosed is a revised response to Item 4, " Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations" and Item 5, "Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved." This matter was discussed between Ross Butcher of your staff and Mike Hellums of my staff on September 6,1984. If you have any questions, please call Jim Domer at FTS 858-2725.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY L. M. Mills, Manager Nuclear Licensing Enclosure 8503010249 840910 PDR ADOCK 05000259 0
\\
An Equal Opportunity Employer g
J
.o
~3-Also,. more deta31ed continuous air monitor diagrams and sampling valve lineups have teen incorporated into TI-38, Procedure 1053 to assist radiochemistr} laboratory personnel in performing their duties correctly and more efficiently. Identification tags.(item 3) have been attached to all continuous air monitor sampling valves in order to eliminate the possibility of an incorrect valve alignment when obtaining a gaseous sample.
4.
Corrective Stans Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations Chemical unit personnel, with the assistance of NCO and Site Services, are currently in the process of reviewing and revising all surveillance instructions and parts of TI-18, -19, and -38 that are used in them.
This process has proven to be auch more involved and tedious than predicted and has required the full-time commitment of three experienced personnel. Approximately 75 percent of these procedures have been reviewed and revisions are in the review / approval cycle.
These procedures have been corrected for the ability to perform as written and for technical soundness. The other 25 percent will be reviewed and revised to the same criteria. A computer based procedure review and revision tracking system is being developed and an individual has been assigned to procedure control to ensure that a periodic detailed review is performed on all surveillance instructions and supporting technical instructions.
5.
Date When Full Conn 11ance Will Be Achieved All procedure review and subsaquent revisions will be completed by January 31, 1985.
) i i
,9 4
,4 L: j
. :: Mm a,s,w ~& :G.
N
, jfNhhm[nn~.;h [I N M +h[g g y sh.
x~
~ o
,a, mad!Ibeb., m.3dh w.L i
.z