ML20107H916

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Opposes Restart Until Health & Safety Issues Resolved, Particularly in View of 850222 Confirmation from Operator That Some Meltdown of Core Occurred During 1979 Accident,In Contradiction to Previous Denials.Served on 850227
ML20107H916
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/1985
From: Reed S
HARRISBURG, PA
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
CON-#185-737 SP, NUDOCS 8502270321
Download: ML20107H916 (2)


Text

W7

/ u +

r DOCKETEB

\\

U$NRI,,

b+%

?

  • e*,,,, #e 15 FEB 26 P3:19 eonernuma p-ZBRMFFICE OF THE MAYO rr e

e MOD. L UTIL FAC.

ftX.

CITY GOVERNMENT CENTER HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17101-1678 STt PilEN R. RFED February 22, 1985 g

g Mr. Nunzio J. Palladino, Chair Nuclear Regulatory Commission United States of America 7920 Norfolk Avenue Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Chairman Palladino:

Today's official confirmation from the operator of Three Mile Island that some meltdown of the core of TMI Unit 2 did, indeed, occur during the 1979 accident, is a very significant admission.

It contradicts previous denials of such.

During the TMI accident, a number of stack monitors, the maximum measuring capacity of which was 1000 REMS, were " stuck" at that level for a period of as much as eight hours.

This means, simply, as we understand it, that emissions from the plant exceeded that significant emission level.

Locally, the question of short and long term health effects from TMI's accident and its operations before and since the accident have been vigorously debated.

Since no conclusive data exists in the Nation to conclusively identify such effects, there is no local " comfort" from known data either.

I believe that it is imperative that the U.S. Government determine the levels and types of contaminants that would have been and were emitted from TMI during the 1979 accident, particularly in view of the f act a portion of the Unit 2 core actually melted under temperatures higher than what were ever previously projected to have occurred.

I further believe that it should not be so easily dismissed that because of the emission of such contaminants into a semi-rural atmosphere that these contaminants posed no threat to public health and safety.

NRC records have established, and enforcement action against the TMI operator have reveale.d, that omission of information has occurred at TMI regarding data. The need for objective and independent data has therefore been established for quite some time.

8502270321 850222 PDR ADOCK 05000289 G

PDR

/) SO'Z -