ML20107G550
| ML20107G550 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1985 |
| From: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20107G552 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8502260459 | |
| Download: ML20107G550 (8) | |
Text
.,.
~
7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET N0. 50-483 r
NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF IS!!!ANCE OF AMENDMEiT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE AND PROPOSED-NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION diiTERMINA1T4N AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Connission) is considering issuance of an, amendment to Faqility Operating License No.
NPF-30, issued to Union Electric Company, for operation of the Callaway
(
. Plant Unit 1 located in Callaway County, Missouri.
~
, Thjs, amendment would revise the time pe,riod.. associated with Technical w-Specification Surveillance 4.6.1.6.1 by extending each of the three schedu. led containmentvesseltendonsurveillancessix(6) months.,inaccordancewith
~
the licensee's request dated February 12, 1985.' This. extension is requested because the services of INRYC0, the inspection contractor for Union Electric arid Alabama. Power Co., are needed to evaluate anomalies recently found at the Farley Unit 2 plant. ' Union Electric Company released INRYC0 to Alabama Power l-Company so that the outage associated with the Farley problem is not un-,
l necessarily extended.
Befdre ' issuance of the proposed license amendnent, the Connission will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 'as amended l
(the Act) and the Cre.ission's regulations.
1
I W O-01 2-The ' Commission has made a proposed detemination that ', he amendment
~
reques't involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the Comission's regulations in.10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accidentfromanyaccident,previouslyevaluated;or(3)involveasignificant reduction in a margin of safety.
The licensee's amendment application addressed the design conservatism.
(,,,
inspections of installation activities, field anchor head materials,' recen't.
U fiel' inspection results, and expected results from the initial inservice,...
d
..m._
tendon surveillance for the Callaway post tensioning system. The initial installation inspections and recent field inspections have confirmed'the e
continuing tendon integrity so that a six month extension in the time for further detailed tendon surveillance will not significantly increase the probability of tendon' failure and will, therefore, not increase the probability e
or consequences of any previously analyzed accident. Becase the proposed extension of the time for detailed tendon surveillance will not impact tendon-l integrity,'will not affect the method and manner of plant operation, and will i
not affect components and equipment important to safe operation, the proposed cmencnent (foes nct create the possibility of a new and di'#erent accident from any previously evaluated.
Because recent field inspections showed no o?
+
r 7590-01 l
- evidence of tendon failure and because containment.prestress" levels are not
~
expected to decrease by any significant degree in the proposed six month period of surveillance ext,ension, th,is revision to the Technical Specifications will not signific'antly reduce any margins of safety. On these bases, the' staff proposes to determine that this amendment extending the tendon surveillance period does not involve significant hazards considerations, j
.The Commission is seeking public commgnts on this proposed determination.
Any comments received within 30' days after the date of publication of this m.
gg notice will be considered in making any final determination. The Commission 5,,g.A_.
will notwrmally make a final determination, unless it receives a request for aheafing.
. g-g.u.
~
c-
.n:-Consents should be addressed to the Secretary of the Consission, U.S.
~~[-
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20555, Attn: Docketing and Service Branch.
By March 28, 1985 the licensee may file a request for a hearing with
~
respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating
?!! '
license and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding mus,t fi.le a written petition"for leave to intervene. Request for a hearing and petitions.for 4
- leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Comission's." Rules M Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CFR Part 2.
If e recuest for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the e
e e
7f90-01 4
. above date,,th'e Consnission or an A'tomic Safety and'Licensinh Board, designated by the Consnission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the re, quest andj,or petition end the' Secretary o-the designated Atomic -Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene shall
. set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular. reference to the following factors: (1)thenature m;
j of:the petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the proceedipg;
~"
(2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other
'~~~ ~
fnterest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which,
may-be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition should also identify.the specific aspects of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene.
Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who h'as been admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fifteen (15) days' prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceed-ino, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above.
l
%e e
[
~
l~
l 7590-01 g
O:;
-5
" ~ #..-
k.Not'later than fifteen (15) day!, prior to the.first prehearing conference
\\-
~
scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file.a supplement to the petition to intervene which trust inelude a list of the con' entions which are c
t sought to be litigated in the matter, and the bases fnr each contention s'et forth with reasonable. specificity. Contentions shall be limited to matters.
'within the scope of the atendment under consideration. A petitioner who 3
fails to file such a suppigment which satisfies these requirements with
?p.
respect to at least one contention,will not be pemitted to participate as a R,-
party.
F g.
- . These pemitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject S.. '
to:any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the..
p:
opportunity to participate fully in the condwt of the hearing, including
[
J the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
s
\\\\
fc
- -:--If a hearing is requested,-the Commission will make a final determination
'on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The final determination 1
will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
[
If the final detemination is that the ameridment-request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Cormnission may issue the amendment and make 'it effective, notwithstanding the request for a hearing.. Any hearing held would take place after issuance of the amendrent.
V.
L If the final-determination is that the amendment involves a significant
~
htzerds consideration, any hearing held would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
i.
~
.v c
7590-01 Nomallyi tie Commission will' not issue the amendment $ntil the expiration l
I of the 30-day notice perio'd. However, should circumstances change during the notice period s,uch that fa,ilure to a,ct in a timely way would result, for i
example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, the Comission may issue w
the license amendment before the expiration of the 30-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that the amendment involves no
.significant hazards considgration. The final detemination will consider all public and State consents received. Should the Commission take this action.
I g.
it w 11 publish a notice of issuance and provide for opportunity for a hearing after issuance. The Commission expects that the need to tak' this e
1...,
p...
action will occur very infrequently.
[
A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be j-
" filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory x..
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention: Docketing and Service Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street.
N.W. Washington. 0.C.', by the above date. Where petitions are filed during i-the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it 'is requested that the petitioner promptly so infom the Connission by a toll-free telephone ca.11
[
to Westerri Union at (800) 325-6000 [in Missouri (800) 342-6700]..The. Western a
Union operator should be given Datagram Identification Number '3737 and the follov.ing message addressed to B. J. Your.gblood:
petitioner's name and
' telephone number; date petition was mailed; plant nane; and publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice. A copy of'the petition
~
7590-01
' should also be sent to i:he Executive Legal Director, U.S Nudlear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C.
20555, and to Gerald Charnoff, Esquire, Shaw, Pittman, Pctts 4 Trowbridge, 1800 M. Street, N. W., Washington, D. C. 2003E, attorney for the licensee.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions.,
supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a detemination by the Comission, the presiding officer or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board design g to rule on the petition and/or request, that the petitioner has made a substantial showing of good cause for the g ranting of a late petition and/or request.,.That determination will be based g
u m._. -.
, g ]
upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(1)-(v) and.,
^
2.714(d).
- ~_j For,further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment which is available for public inspection at the Comission's Public Document Room, 1717 H. Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and at the Fulton City Library, 709 Market Street, Fulton, Missari 65251 and the Olin-Library of Washington University, Skinker and Lindell relevards. St. Louis, Missouri 63130.
Date'd.at Bethesda, Maryland, this M 58ay of February 1985.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGUt. ATOPY COMMISSION f%g&f 3
B.
. Youngb1 od, Chief l
. Li e ing Br nch No. 1 Divi ion of Licensing l'
s e
-i. -. -
,--el.,
o FEB 211995 7590-01 -
should also be sent to the Executive' Legal Direct 6r, U.S Nuclear Regulatory Connission. Washington, D.C. '20555, and.to Gerald Charnoff, Esquire, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, 1800 M Street, N. W.,> Washington, D. C. 20036, attorney for the licensee.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave supplemental petitions and/or requests for hea,to, intervene, amended petitions, ring will not be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding officer or the Atom t Safety and Licensing Board designated to rule on the petition and/or request, that the petitioner has made a substantial showing of good cause for the granting of a late petition and/or request. That determination will be based upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(1)-(v) and 2.714(d).
For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment which is available for public inspection at the Connission's Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and at the Fulton City Library, 709 Market Street, Fulton,' Missouri 65251 and the Olin Library of Washington University, Skinker and Lindell Boulevards, St. Louis, Missouri i
batedatBethesda, Maryland,thisd ay of February 1985.
y FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
!b B. J. Youngb cod, Chief Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing DL:LBf1 014 1
DL:LB#1 D-6 JStevens s
MRu ook P0'Connor B
u blood 9/M/85 p
85 4 /sf'85 2
85
} / '85
/
ak ge5 s
I
. - -. _ -, -