ML20107F434
| ML20107F434 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 10/24/1984 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20107F430 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8411060136 | |
| Download: ML20107F434 (2) | |
Text
E
', f
-~
, p= = tam [c UNITED STATES
.p
e
- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- %.%..'J
' SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO.31 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF-12 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1
~
I.
INTRODUCTION
~ - -. - -
By letter dated March 22,.1984, South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE&G-) requested a change to Technical Specification Table'3.8-2,"
" Motor Operated Valves Thermal Overload Protection and/or Bypass Devices."
The amendment would add additional motor operated valves and correct spelling errors.
II.
EVAL ATION The additional motor operated valves are in the service water, residual heat removal, and reactor building spray systems.
They are required to be listed based on an engineering review of Regulatory Guide 1.106,
" Thermal Overload Protection.for Electric Motors on Motor Operated Valves," and a comparison of the Technical Specificaticr Table 3.8-2 with Final Safety Analysis Report Table 3.9-8, " Active Code Class 1, 2, and 3 Valves." The staff finds the addition of these motor operated valves acceptable. The staff reviewed the spelling corrections and finds them acceptable. Therefore, the staff concludes that the requested amend-
. ment is acceptable.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION I
This amendment involves a change in the use of a facility component i
located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The.
- staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be. released offsite and that there is no significant increase in f-
- individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The Comission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendrnent involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, this amendrrent meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Sec 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amend-ment.
1 0
P
ed IV.
CONCLUSION The Commission made a proposed determination that the amendment involves no significant. hazards consideration which was published in the Federa.
Register (49 FR 33370) on August 22, 1984, and consulted with the state of South Carolina. No public comments were received, and the state of South Carolina did not have any comments.
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be'endange' red by operation in the 2roposed manner, and (2) such activities,will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
Jon B. Hopkins, Licensinc Branch No. 4, DL
- 0. P. Chopra, Power Systems Branch, DSI Dated: Octob'er 24, 1984
F October 24, 1984 Al'El'Or.Et T NO. 31 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF Virgil C. Summer Unit 1 DISTRIBUTION w/ enclosures:
bec w/ enclosures:
et No. 50-395 NRC PDR LB #4 r/f Local PDR J. Hopkins NSIC M. Duncan PRC System OELD ACRS (16)
E. Adensam R. Diggs, ADM T. Barnhart (4)
J. N. Grace, DPR:I&E E. L. Jordan, DEQA:I&E L. Harmon, I&E
- 0. Brinkman, SSPB DESIGNATED ORIGINAL Certified By
. gf[g
-