ML20107E310
| ML20107E310 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 01/15/1985 |
| From: | Danni Smith COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| 9627N, NUDOCS 8502250511 | |
| Download: ML20107E310 (48) | |
Text
7_
Commonwealt'h Edison
)
/
') One First Nation't Plua. Chicago, Illino
/
S kO 7 Address Reply to: Post Offica Box 767
-\\
/ Chicago, Illinois 60690 pg7gg77y pg,;77gg Gw fycL
&,s-?
u a
January 15, 1985 k
nLQbbL-s Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator - Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
Subject:
Braidwood Station Units 1 & 2 Braidwood Construction Assessment Program Monthly Meeting Minutes / Monthly Report Docket No. 50-456 and 50-457
Dear Mr. Keppler:
The fifth open briefing on the status of the BCAP effort was provided to the NRC on January 3, 1985 at the Mazon EOF.
Forwarded herewith is a meeting summary including a copy of the visual-aid material used in the presentations.
The next briefing meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on February 14, 1985 at the Mazon EOF.
Also forwarded herewith for your information is the BCAP Director's Progress Report for the month of December, 1984.
Please direct any questions relating to BCAP to Mike Wallace, Assistant Manager of Projects and the Braidwood Project Manager.
ytrulyyogrs, J /(ed David H. Smith Nuclear Licensing Administrator-Attachments cc:
NRC Resident Inspector.- Braidwood NRC BCAP Inspector - Braidwood John Hansel - ERC N. N. Kaushal - CECO gol h##"bCkhhk AD l
A&,\\
1 9627N
)
j i
Meeting Summary BCAP NRC/ CECO /ERC Monthly Meeting January 3, 1985 9:00 a.m.
Mazon EOF 4
The meeting was opened with a brief statement by A. B. Davis of the NRC Region III giving the purpose for the meeting, that is, to discuss BCAP, it's progress, and the Independent Expert Overview Group's (IEOG) review of the BCAP.
Mr. Davis also stated that upon completion of the presentation by CECO and the IBOG, the NRC would respond to questions from the public in attendance.
The following is the agenda utilized for the remainder of the meeting.
I.
Introduction Presented by the Braidwood Project Manager to provide the major topics of the presentation (see Enclosure 1).
II.
BCAP Task Force Presented by the BCAP Director to provide the BCAP achievements 4
Ecr the month of December (see Enclosure 2).
l III.
Sargent & Lundy Presented by the Sargent & Lundy Project Director to provide Sargent & Lundy's status of work (see Enclosure 3).
IV.
Quality Assurance 4
Presented by the General Supervisor of Quality Assurance to describe the overview activities of the CECO BCAP QA group (see
' ).
V.
150G Progress Report Presented by the Assistant Project Manager of the 150G to describe the overview activities of the 1800 (see Enclosure 5).
s Additional items discussed during the meeting are included in The attendance for the meeting is.provided in Enclosure 7.
The meeting adjourned at 10:30 a.m.
0760J l
c BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (HCAE)
MONTHLY NRC STAFF BRIEFING JANUARY 3, 19811 I.
INTRODUCTION MIKE WALLACE II.
BCAP TASK FORCE NINU KAUSHAL III.
DISCREPANCY EVALUATION KEN K0STAL IV.
QUALITY ASSURANCE NEIL SMITH V.
INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP B0B HAM i
F
'~
Page 1 of 7 4
BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP)
MONTHLY BRIEFING PRESENTED TO w
i REGIONAL OFFICE REGION III U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION N. N. KAUSilAL BCAP DIRECTOR.
JANUARY 3, 1985
/%.
l'.
s Ehclosure 2 Page 2 of 7 1)DEUMENTATION STATUS THE PROGRAM DOCUMENT HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCLUDE:
MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES AND CORRECTIONS TRANSMITTED DECEMBER 13, 1984 REVISED CRITERIA ON INSPECTION ATTRIBUTES FOR SAMPLE EXPANSIONS (PER LETTER O' CONN 0R TO KEPPLER, AUGUST 30, 1984)
TRANSMITTED DECEMBER 13, 1984 ELIMINATION OF COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE POSITION TRANSMITTED DECEMBER 20, 1984 l-(1134D)
I
[.-
L J
r Page 3 of 7 PRESENTATION OllTLINE DOCUMENTATION STATUS CSR STATUS RPSR STATUS RSCAP STATUS MANPOWER STATUS
-(1134D)
J
Page h of T ESR STATUS COMPLETED TOTAL IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION CATEGORIES 34 34 DESCRIPTION OF POPULATIONS 30 34 IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS IN POPULATIONS 20 34 RAND 0M PORTION SELECTION 13 34 ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT PORTION SELECTION 0/4" 34 REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS 19 31 VERIFICATION PACKAGES 783 2,860""
REINSPECTIONS 484 2,860**
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW CHECKLISTS 6
34 l
DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PACKAGES 181 3,180**
i DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS 60 3,180**
l WORK STARTED ON FOUR (4) POPULATIONS, 0 COMPLETED APPR0XIMATE, CURRENT ESTIMATE l
(1134D)
(
l
Ehclosure 2 Page 5 of 7 RPSR STATUS IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES IS COMPLETE, TOTAL 0F 500 PROCEDURES IDENTIFIED.
IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN FSAR COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS IS 85% COMPLETE DATA BASE IS BEING FINAL REVIEWED PREPARATORY TO INITIATING PROCEDURE REVIEW t
e (1134D) f j
Page 6 of 7 I
RSCAP STATUS ALL SCAPS ARE UNDER REVIEW SIX (6) OBSERVATIONS IDENTIFIED DURING LAST MONTH (TOTAL TO DATE 10)
. QCSSR FINAL REPORT DRAFTED AND UNDERG0ING REVIEW SAFETY RELATED PIPE. SUPPORTS REPORT IN DRAFT STAGE p:
4 s
V (113 LID)
E a
Page 7 of' T D
CD
\\w m
y m
,,,, 43
\\*
,/,
9"f ' ' '
lf m
CD f
-e DC
//
f
.:a.
.at. l.,2c..,
.a.;
64.,w P.,<..
t w.. a., y y,f;y dt.3.,.,,4p,.a,
c ~.
p,k.,.rp..< i ', -
et
.. rf.
L.a.. ;.w;
,v. m w.;n f.,fn m..,~-,v.;.,,6.,i.
q, a.m.W^d y..;; rc:
..a. I-a:*A :7
. a...w.
.. m/<
?% d;hM;- 'M::rt:2mre ':2?x ait: 42 2x 1,Lg?
W 4
CL.
p? ":V g*c: ".:gWtd 4.I
- En fAufgr# #2;;4kr.r hW 4y: ':c f
v
.ti:w;.2ty:~ CD E
lvd.
d=
L2" wE
$a3*
3
\\
3 m' -
<0 SalM*** kr 212$Ik' g 2weiti: 2 ; * ($.%.t,"%::m'/4f; a ' SOC
..t cf,cm
,l2*2.,. $. ;P,ch..y::.if:~s.
P,}[g.:K,...-
- (:
N u.g,.E,.<!2.v
...ki.:4:.?:Etp; e.i c.<.w
- .v.Rl{<.p.si.
- .te.2f.i.2.,
98tte
- v.. #.v d.w:,#.v,p;;gr:.
v4 ce,
. a r, a
- da..
..,,s, g.
- v.....
.ya.,.l::.. tt,,,,ke..,,p,4 A-
. y
+
.M::,sn.
- s. k,;e;n g K.a.
. a.g:..r c-
.u :M' 26, gjy#4, y:f.v.c<r it.sv iv.) d(v.u..,a(e.c..
- c..x.w.w
- . w our.
,e..vc d
s g
y4 iN a..
6
%m.,g;.,:s' re tr/.c -
qw M'da:q de, c 7:^..
w l,
j m
rt:2;ve a
W9,ni x
mV.s..o,.:nw ~;4..
. :1..g gJ.J,og.
E ge<%.l.gsu,
.4 w
c
.. ~.. <
.y i;sg:;4 hr.# 4ewt.p
- $::s:
(D
.,s e
.f..
.p<.
,2
. e,..ay I'; a e
l.
- 2. 43.
N,m.g..
g
.1w f., $... l P(A",M,f/
w.
...a<,i<...,.
=
5
,@a. ?.,g.. $.MA
' g}is F2 Ye1EIIsi a
, fy:.y.::ff:.s,,$a.a4d v., 2 T"4 g
/,,n.p' w?.:(<
,E,.ite l
?.s?l,?,,
6...,. cc,,s,:.:-mes::4:F:
- . ;s l<t.is.i
- t:2(i2, M:f:d.w:g eW v4
<.v s
.csw
<o
.e
.v.
gc s$fa.v fa
.n g
v
- v. c 8"8
/
L@ IN), Naf,..f,g;2.. -
/*88'. ^,v,.ya.y. v.4 3
a
..y k a,,G'M. eII 88 8i$ty.y, g.rf.
.yt.,. jew. /.
e ' M.. '.v.fm r
,.ww,v.g. a }
'" :{4l"ll$3;,4x'p:
w
- /.ct,.V 4e
..,.a
- ~1,a iN.W e
,;p: rim' y.);
.v A
si;? :*v4ji'i a f
C
,' M'"E""p:S".
> 9 ' 4-Et ff.;
i; -ig.g ;; d
,,g:
de:"
- eG,, :u a.
-:4..
- u le
z:...s
- M 8
W' wy.bW?i%,.'
Ea Wllw
.. 2rEs=;;4,e //
M.sa4....4.b...:#..'.
y:-
CD as :.
- d.e,
,.e.
D,
,243..
ED a
2 *.a*.,'.*...W. ". '. '
- ' *st'
' h.
,..y'...
m2 m,.
~
N h
'/ ;; c2;csd%is1
- .?
k.f.'.' :- :-
(f
@*istY.v e::;c,r4,%...
..?
2 4tz-I j
/< hd
.v,.'d.$a.. <. f..,ty.;M.':.W+?.M.acv:@..v,.,.
5use;(:s2!e2.<4. :.<e.,s, e;fMs L232fi2 d;
.?..$,?(
v4 iw ca'
..ecs.
a 7,.
v
- v. c
.v
. s
.. v.
g.
em
[,
';4': ::p': -gap...:'
.;ie::c.
jreg" iis.g;;i;"ad,p,e+; avg;v.;:,.;;ge l4ls;:q:.4:.::'Tct:q:e:
i;:g,W
- 4 ;;:jA ec :.
- C mi,E M 2r,;MW %. f'(.4 p... 9 iej
.ff
- gy '2
- ,
4 ti ic d'
,.,."h.:.-1:gf..s p.;.rif f
- ieCa,2,3y ;.$,,x
- ,w*a.Cp..e#,,,c.:.:f.(",,.c,.pt., nc lR;tt...
- - S,,w Es
..'th,v$i.'4...,i
.e d
s'..
- 1:
w a
., g.
.,vc
..ity M, s
....,,p<,s c.s
,vc.
F.,4.y.
,mcc,, 5.itM,v,c.?J.d.
g
.J1.h..l:'s :(? "lT>:* ${$0 r* 9,:
c
,s,w..
s N:,,c
.y
.m v.
c.
,.44;.::i<t:'4Et :94A$ c g-jh, b.
kk h
k5 hk?hhifi 5hh
/
'.n:. :,<-
- co. 4.e,:g*"5g<"%,a)'::.. E.,c.i.'..,m:<[.c,..
c.a.
,... ;.;xw<
. g,7..
s% ;i..;.'.< pi i;st,a.
.y g..<
~
s,
- y..<. :apr..a
,.t.;.y :g;ly;;r;,j g
4 J-k,,,, N v -a,:ay ;,;%',.:*:l#;,:.gl1
- h. <,. e4:;, :e 1
..s,
,;l4 m
- a
.,et, 2
=..3 m r.,. e L.e
. CD
,g
.a m
v.
lli(
giM
$'d,_
_ _ '8;*.,.'r ee
,- w
.;a..*.v.'.y. g,g M'
(%.
'Td
. same
,lg i,.
h.
-. ai'ca
@d*4
{,.,g ;T
.::Ot!
l f' 2 4
... m2M
.v. :. C :si
.4A**O (. 4 A
^.:*. !
Mr e;
f~V '* 4+v f,ff Wb' '2 MNf t
//
s ihar ifr* a :dI'Y"
^'
5 S l
[
6 w:;,;a i :,:,:,'<."v.E,; T,4.s, F i,s.4 v -:
ex.t,..;:- z.
'y.,.2 A". a..
,,..,w y W
I r%
, e.
I ;;; ;4
,w i
m
, su g...,d."U.' -E 8....
,f#. ll,nf,t,iFi
,<,.4' 4
,.,:( ;
,w
, E pw g<
r...a a N
,e.
4 5
,a.
c..
a +;,.,
r.,
4.,
u,a p,
L1J
/*,/. \\.::,;.% i.,
- <". ::%"4 c<a:E..".C.$'4.g//.)":t.
<c
- 4..
J.
j t,:
r.Kw:, x. ::e.::.i
,.r.)l.u..;e...,. %
a v
Q
>.re.V - ';;
- ac
,gr. 7
- g. ",
- ?y;a =q T'%
- t.<
g a
zg WK f.(:
- .n{
'g uj iig $:!il i"M:F.M
,o l
g M:vec :"
I I
I I
I I
I I-I I
ue e
e e
e e
e e
a e
a e
c, Cn
,e r%
.a m
en cy
.4 L
to J
,- (j -
raN $"E !a
.,/
1-03-85 CSR REINSPECTION DISCREPANCIES BY CONTRACTOR RECEIVED COMPLETED CONTRACTOR POPULATION DJRPBJI CURRENT
- COMSTOCK CONDUIT 69 18 CONDUIT HANGERS 1
e CABLES 1
CABLE PAN HANGERS 1
. PULLMAN DUCTS 35 18 HVAC EQUIP. INSTALL.-
7 DUCT HANGERS 38 21 PHILLIPS GEION SB PIPING 22 12 LB PIPING 5
3 NEWBERG CONCRETE PLACEMENT 58 18
' 237 90
-w-
1-03-85 Page 2 of 12 CSR DISCREPANCIES BY CLASSIFICATION CAIEGORY RECEJVED COMPLEIED WELDRG - UNDERCUT, UNDERGIZE, POROSITY 40 22 DIflENSICNAL - LOCATION, LENGTH 32 23 BOLTING - LOOSE, MISSING, PATTERN 11 5
CONCRETE SURFACE DEFECT 24 6
DAf1 AGE - DENTS, HOLES 17 2
WRONG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE 3
2 INCOMPLETE HVAC - SEALANT, CONNECTION 3
Ef1BEDMENTS 21 2
HVAC FIT-UP - DUCT, HANGERS, DAMPER 1
1 FABRICATION - CABLE PAN HANGER FIELD FAB 1
INVALID - NOT DISCREPANT, NOT SAFETY RELATED 20 20 VALVE STEM ORIENTATION 10 SEGREGATION CODE LABELS - MISSING, ETC.
22 4
ELECTRICAL f1ECHANICAL CONNECTIONS - LOOSE 16 ELFCTRICAL SEPARATION 7
MISCELLANEOUS - I.D.
TAGS, ETC.
9 3
237 90 L
,e MISSINGi WELD ON
- 1==
3 Page 3 of 12 AN MVAC SUPPORT JAh!. 3 1985 3
f
-w cm. m mmm CSR-1-H'OO3 043-001 i 7
__....l r+
L. _ _;
s
,-" ~,,
DETAIL A 1
r w -a s
a-1 l
yi y,
/
'uwa s
.w
~
ELEVATI ON P
'] f '
' d, :
}
l.
y y.
",j y k.
- g
,c - - - - %
g.
y
/
I i.
46 l
'7 3
c DETAI L g DETAIL A
( A5 - DE514NEP,)
(AS - BUILT)
^i
_,a,
~ = -.
- - - - - - "~ "
~-~
Page 4 of 12 e,
BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM CSR WELD MAP Weld Map Cdntinuation Braidwood Station Units 1&2
> (
Identification No:
/ SR-T-H-O_3 Project 4683/4684 Commonwealth Edison Company Observation Record No: C 5 P.T-N -02 &t?-/
Safety Related Package No:
r $ R F R 04t3 Calculation No:
Component No:
? 16 9 Revision No:
Drawing No:
n1. /3 2 3 - 7 Page of Inspector Signature:
7M Date Inspected:
/ / Jo -st/
ygr7
^
( -(
Yg, VlW hi
~yH
,1,
.\\
'----------T---'--- - - - - - - - ~ ~ '
\\
b VbN
\\ li Y
i h
h V fY ~
I 4 /'
h I
y
'\\
r i
ty V!z"%
lg I
l
\\
/
L
~
f WELDED ARE. '
/Y'
% VI:
n a. ;w W THIS FRTDM OF WELD CLO5%T TO TOE OF L b
(-
DQ.T!. 4 O
T
. CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT EXPOSED DUE TO SURF #LE DE FECTS IN SLAB "2c d= 3 Page 5 of 12 JAN. 3.,1985
)r EMBEDMENT PLATE -
C SR - I-S -Ol- 049-OO I c
r-11 D
ii D
V ii V
=
L
)
i
(
N irirerrrarrt iit i
,9
=
,Nc0
(
i(
h l
l1 CONCRETE 1
I REINFORCEMENT I
_ L.L. -
k
-EMBEDMENT PLATE A
r PLAN (BOTTOM OF SLAB) f -- EL. 4 0 l'- O" 1
1 u
....i...
- .......n.;;:.
...... e
... -c.
.;.9 n,*...
,5..
...o 0.l,,*:.
Q
.........:.o.... -
ggs
..a.-
~,
.,...'c'..'... :.:.. '
~
.... ::, p.
- t. :..
- v...
t
-l
\\.... f. '
' u;W...... :.
s N
.: = 1. : :'.3 -
o
\\
\\
S ECTION D
i
b CA P - d S R-
-~
Page 6 of 12 OStreuro Prt c e t PAN C Y Dc r en a C,>m aert o r e c <. -,1.
G s c - I - s - o o t - 64 6 - o o i T---
i________________________I-"
~l i
j_
r4 a r i
I g
o L____
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ -_ _ _l l
l a
i._ _ __ _;
l__l l
l ll l l
I, l
I l
l 5^5
'7 V.
l I
l l
2 +',
I l
g l
l l
- r'o* ]
l
[
l
~1 l
[,
I CO N E T RM C TION l
l e
l I \\_
- --4l i!
I o***.
4 lh l
N lll 1
/
l J-l l
I s
/l fl!
l *,
1; i pcvsenve l
1 I
c o Ne r.cr e.
l l
l l
i AtrA I I l
l ';
lLvl
\\w i
~
s 3 i'. q >
l8
- 2. c' PLAN
( E t. 4-o l '- o )
Page 7 of 12 4
ELECTRICAL DISCEPNICY DISCUSSION DISCEPANCY FEX C0iBJIT FIlTIIGS LOOSE A.
CABES NOT INSTALED B.
CABE$ If6TALED N4D 0.C. ACufitD JITTINGS 3
l lll1lll11 8
r.
/RIGID CONDUIT Z
Q [\\ [
4-5
\\
\\
' FLEXIBLE CONDUIT E Q U,I P hA EN T
Page 8 of 12 ELECTRICALDISC[PANCYDISCUSSION SEGEGATION COI LABELS i
DISCEPANCY A. CONDUIT MISSIE SEGEGATION COE LABEL AT EQUIRENT END B. ONLY OE Half 0F SEGEGATION COI ON CONDUIT IC 0F ICIE e
U N 1T CI)
,{U N C T 1 O 14 (TO ' J E R u
[O \\ V I5 \\ o t-1 i-l (12.)
- f. -
J
Pa6e 9 of 12 o
SnALL BOE PIPING CONFIGUPATlDil DISCREPNEILS (CSR-l/R-M-01 SERIES)
DISCEPNU # CSR-I-f1-01-030-1 VALVE 1RC8060D SBl ORIENTATION
/
50*
r f
?
kJ
%)
AS ESIGED AS Ell 1SECE ANDQCACCEPE BYBCAP d
1 i
'd t
4 v'-
J
F :-TP GA D AN)
U\\) ELE \\G 7 __E-
. WELD ON AN
-WAC SUPPO RT pygr:A2 JAN. 3, l985
\\,'N y
<e k
\\-
/
\\,
k DETAll A
\\
N y
CSR-1-H-03 025 OO2 s
l
\\ xl l, E^~
- pit '
-;9' 1
l I/4 \\ l'/
%[ FIT-UP GAP %
'/4 \\ l'4 2
/ '/
/ l V.
/ V4 /IV2
=
4 2
t'y h
4 y I' EFFECTIVE e sin 'y DETAIL A DE I AIL A
4 5 orstsuce)
SECTION C
(fa. e urt-n 3
T Page 11 of 12 FIT-UP GAP AND UNDERSIZE FILLET WELD ON AN HVAC SUPPORT JAN. B,1985 t
N l
\\
x
\\
s N
8 6
s
~
/
CSR-I H OOS 005-Oo2 t,
,'f/
s3 g
'J/y, DETAIL-A
/;
,/< /
i l
A.
1 hs
_ E FIT-UP (aAF 7
l t
-====
B 0
p P
i 1F p
%V
_+-
- 4.-
%V C
4 DETAIL-A A* 5"*d*)
DETAIL - A * "4)
Idg' FIT-UP QAP
---t 4 e s.; EFFECTIVE WELD = I/e,,
9 y
SECTION -B
. A
Page 12 of 12 l
WVAC DUCT I O HANCaER WEL3S i
CSR -I-H - OOS-OO S - 0 0 3 BAN. S,1985 e
a g'
[ F
]
I 3
- E TO /g l6 l
SILICON BRgNZE l
WELD-st2E6 VARY l
l'AS DESICnMED =
N+' FIT-UF
%" FILLET - fL*/ Lc"'J I
AAF
['
.g
- ]
L
-- -- J (max.)
M gN
__s
- V2 ELEVATION f4 ' FIT-UP QAF
~'
(M AX.)
/i g
FILLET To 5/;WELDg" FILL I/ "
TAPERS FRoM 4
3 ea (EFFECTIVE TAPERS FRot,1 1/gg FILLET To o' Ac.Rosc
~
L E N G.
F WELO.)
SECTION - B
Enclosure b Page 1 of 1h BCAP 0.A.
MONTHLY BRIEFING N. P. SMITH JANUARY 3, 1985 (0209B)
J
Page 2 of 14 9
ORGANIZATION / PERSONNEL e
DOCUMENT REVIEWS S
AUDIT / SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULES AND RESULTS 0
COMPARIS0N OF VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION METHODS FOR Q.A. OVERINSPECTION 0
Q.A. OVERINSPECTION/0VERVIEW G
HOLD POINTS 6
(0209B)
^'
Page 3 of 14 ORGANIZATION / PERSONNEL 0
ONE INSPECTOR HAS BEEN ADDED (0209B)
J
P48! a
- W v e w, P
3 6
A
/
N 4
N AJ A.
Q 6
6 A
/
C 4
N ED 3
2 3
N 4
A 1
8 R
J AELCUN 6
2 3
C 4
8 E
1 D
)
E S
3 V
R L
E A
4 6
E L
E N
2 6
N Y
L A
2 1
N E
L J
O C
E A
S N
G R
R E
A E
E I
R V
P R
E O
E V
6 P
A 4
4 X
(
2 7
E C
2 1
N R T G
A.
O S I
S I S
Q S I L S
R V A A
- E R I S
E E C R
N R N P E S
O O
O I U P R
T I
S G S S O
C T
I N
/
T E
I V E N S C
P S
R O R E
S O
E T I E P
N P
P N T E S
I U E C N N
S M E I I
1 E P G L L S N
+
A E N E R
I E D R N A E A.
E E V
)
G L G Q B
9 0
2 0(
Enclosure h W
Page 5 of 1h
.1
,1 -
a DOCUMENT REVIEWS (DECEMBER)
REVISIONS TO POLICY / PLANS 3
REVISIONS TO PROCEDURES / INSTRUCTIONS 7
REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS / INSTRUCTIONS 15 INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION PACKAGES 0
25 l
t (0209B) a
BCAP O.A. SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE SHEET 1
OF 2
SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE Col (PLETED SURVEILLANCE YEAR 1985 MO H
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH ENDING 11 18 25 1
8 15 22 1
8 15 22 29 CSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-20 X
l l
X X
BCAP-21 X
X X
BCAP-22 X
X X
BCAP-23 X
X X
BCAP-24 X
X X
BCAP-25 X
X X
X BCAP-30 X
X X
FPSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-41 X
X
'X BCAP-42 X
X X
X X
BCAP-43 X
X X
X X
FSCAP - PROCEDURES BCAP-60 X l l
l lX l l
l IX l l
l IX l l
l l
l IX l l
l IX l
@ IN, - PROCEDURES BCAP-01 X
X X
lX BCAP-03 X
X X
BCAP-04 X
X BCAP-06 X
X X
yp BCAP-08 I
X X
%S S E I. - PROCEDURES mh kE BCAP Related l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l 1
lX l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l FROJECT - PROCEDURES V
BCAP Related l
l l
l l
l l
l l
IX l l
l l
l l
l IX l l
l l
l (0201F)
BCAP O.A. AUDIT SCHEDULE SHEET 1_
OF _2_,
SCHEDUt.ED AUDIT COMPLETED AtIDIT YEAR 1985 MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH 3
ENDING 11 18 25 1
8 15 22 1
8 15 22 29 CSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-20 X
BCAP-21 X
BCAP-22 X
BCAP-23 X
BCAP-24 X
BCAP-25 X
BCAP-30 X
RPSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-41 X
l BCAP-42 X
BCAP-43 X
l RSCAP - PROCEDURES BCAP-60 l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
IX l l
l l
l l
l l
l_
ADMIN. - PROCEDURES BCAP-01 X
BCAP-02 X
BCAP-03 X
BCAP-04 X
m BCAP-06 I
X
- y BCAP-07 I
N8 BCAP-08 I
Qg S & L - PROCEDURES y#
BCAP Related l
I l
IX l i
I l
l l
l l
I l
l l
l l
IX l l
l PROJECT - PROCEDURES BCAP Related I
lX l I
l l
l I
l l
l I
I l
l l
l l
l l
l l
(0201F)
b-3kb S.
i$kf> i ' N s iT.
~._
SHEET i Otr 1
~
%.9-[:., i :
y[ Ni' ij BCAP QoAo Ii SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE
~ ~ * ;;
4; p. }f,.
(ANNUAL)
SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE 11011 Surveillances To Date
- COMPLETED SURVEILLANCE YEAR 1984 ACTIVITY /
SUBJECT AREA HONTH SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBEk EK 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 0~1 14 2l 28 ENon.n CSR - PROCEDUI:ES b',.P-20 l
l M
4m lla -
14 *A P-21 E
l N
Bf'AP-22 HM F XI B
~
'5523
[_E[
_KLH.3 WM mu M
EM l NM l E
BCAP-24 l__
_l l
f IM R - PROCFDURE3 BrAP-41 N
M "fD
~
~~
N N
M8 A
gcgp.42 BCAP-43 E
l remu l
Enl Id'IP-60 l
l l
RSCAP - PROCEDURIG em ar -
1B nl411N. - Eh0CEDUNES l
l BCAP-01 5
BCAP-02 l
UgAP-03 I
ItCAP-04 j
j BCAP-Ou l
BCAP-07 BCAP-08 L
i NY i
%?
cna (01093)
Hr i
V T
5o oaMm e 5 n*
- o% ev 8
c 2
- N B
2 B
M F
E O
C N
E 4
D 1
l T
3 W
2 E
1 E
0 HS E
M 1
0 3
I gp EW M
3 e
2 ta RE D
BM 6
o E
1 T
VON s
t 9
i 0
d EL u
U A
D 2
E 0
H C
[
S j
)
TL 6
IA 2
DU UN ANA
. (
R 9
A.
BE 1
Q OT P
C B
A O
2
}y C
1 K
B E
6, M
.yI 5
M 0
i :
. ?:
E,_
8 Q
2 7
R E
p (
[_
B M
E 1
T 2
P E
lllll l
S i
4 f
f 1
r I
D D
U U
^
S
- 1. f A A
S E
3 H
G N
S E
R b
D T
I S
E R
U
[ u.
s E
N D
E R
U D
" 1*
R U
D E
t T
O E.
M D
t F
U D
E C
r e
D E
C O
H E
0 1
234 C
1 23 O
0I 123 4678
(
t C
O C
22222 O
4 44 R cP 0.0 0
000 0
S C
A O
R P
j E
R PPPPP P
P P P P
A_ P PPPP P
P A
A A
A
- A c :; n:tAAAgC A
AAAA A
/R P
fcCC CCC C CC C _ N b _ lj YA E ;-
E_ B B
BE P
n B B BB E
T R
A I T 1
1 VC R
S C
I i I?
I E S
P S
J
)
_A 8
TJ C
H I
9 CB l
0 AU S
~
1 t
.f 0
~
(
2 v
Enclosure h Page 10 of 14 AUDIT AND S JRVFIl I ANCE RESul TS OECEM3ET)
BCAP PROCFDURES FINDINGS AND ITEMS OPENFD CLOSED ADMIN 0
2 CSR 1
0 RSCAP 0
0 RPSR 0
0 TOTAL 1
2 1 ITEM OPENED INVOLVED PROCEDURE INADEQUACY (02098)
Enclosure b Page 11 of 14 i
AUDIT AND SURVEIL 1ANCE RESULTS (TO-DATF)
BCAP PROCEDURES
- ILDINGS AND ITEMS 0 )E nFD CLOSED ADMIN 11 11 CSR 10 7
RSCAP 1
1 RPSR 0
0 TOTAL 22 19 l
(0209B)
J Page 12 of lb COMPARISON OF VERIFICATION METHOD AND VALIDATION METHOD FOR Q.A. OVERINSPECTION OBJECTIVE %
SUBJECTIVE %
AVERAGE VERIFICATION 100 96.5 AVERAGE VALIDATION 100 97.6 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 95 90 t
(02098) a
Enclosure h Page 13 of 1h Q.A. DVERINSPECTION/DVERVIEW 9
RECERTIFIED Q.A. OVERVIEW INSPECTORS TO PTL's RECENTLY REVISED PROCEDURE PRIOR TO START OF OVERINSPECTIONS 9
COMMENCED OVERINSPECTIONS ON 12-27-84 9
POPULATIONS COVERED T0-DATE:
SMALL BORE PIPE CONFIGURATION HVAC DUCT (0209B)
i Ihclosure 4 Page lh of 14 H01 D POINTS 0
BCAP Q.A. LETTER OF DECEMBER 20, 1984
- LIFTED HOLD POINT FOR REINSPECTION AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEW ACTIVITIES
- BCAP TASK FORCE REQUESTED TO NOTIFY BCAP 0.A. A MINIMUM 0F 24 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF REINSPECTIONS OR DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS FOR EACH POPULATION
- AS AN EXTRA MEASURE OF CONSERVATISM FOR BCAP THE HOLD POINT FOR BCAP TASK FORCE REINSPECTORS WILL BE LIFTED UPON THE ACCEPTABILITY 0F BCAP INSPECTORS TO PERFORM BCAP-24 ACTIVITIES ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS THROUGH THE COMPLETION OF BCAP (02098)
l P
s-ji BCAP STATUS MEETING for
- December, 1984 INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP January 3,
1985 O
?
~
fPage 2 of 6
~~03:: CS Execut:ive Summary o
o Overview Activi :ies O
C'osec:
- ssues anc Concerns o
Oaen Issues anc: Concerns
[
Page 3 of 6 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
o-BCAP OVERVIEW 4
Functioning as designed with checks and bal ances in pl ace.
4 o
CSR ELEMENT Improvement in production of reinspection packages and performance of reinspections.
No major problems are evident.
o RPSR ELEMENT Checklists nearing completion.
Ac tual review of procedures near commencement.
o RSCAP ELEMENT Determination of relevant commitments still in progress.
i o
BCAP QA Large effort on recertification of PTL inspectors.
J
~
MT:;i OVERVIEW ACTIVITIES REINSPECTIONS i
l o
Surfaced / closed concern on quality of completed reinspection packages.
l AUDITS
~
o Monitored BCAP QA audits
. DOCUMENTATION REVIEW o
Maintained reviews of BCAP observa-tions and S&L Design Significant Ev al uati ons 1
o Maintai ned reviews of chec(li sts, l
procedures and pl ans
(
~
,. ~ - - -
--,-...,,,,-.,_.-----.y._,,,-,%
..y.--,-
s w.
.~.v-
,=.,.,.--
2..
M i"? !
CLOSED ISSUES ISSUES 1)
Revision to BCAP Program Document.
2)
Resolution on " Hold Tags" for areas to be reinspected by BCAP inspectors Issued =PCD-15.
.r 3)
Ev'al uatibn of CSR di screpancies to the' most ' adverse 1ocation within the popdl ati on.
/
1
s R T3 3 l
OPEN ISSUES ISSUES 1)
Control points for reinspections.
2)
Resolution of inspector reinspection element of RSCAP.
3)
Resolution of documentation problems found during small bore piping con-figuration review.
4
- Y, "- =
Paga 1 of 2 4
i Items Discussed at the NRC/ CECO /ERC Meeting January 3, 1985 9:00 a.m.
During Mr. Kaushal's presentation, it was stated that under CSR element of BCAP, three populations will require document review only.
1~
These three populations have been identified as Post Tensioning, Cored 1
Holes and Cadwelds.
Mr Kostal stated, during the Sargent & Lundy presentation, that the testing of the silicon bronze welding process has been established and that he would keep the NRC informed of the test results in future meetings.
i i
A discussion of the engineering evaluation of loose flex connections on conduit centered around the approach that Sargent & Lundy will take to analyze these discrepancies.
4 Mr. Smith presented the BCAP-QA activities for the month of December during which discussion centered around the recertification of BCAP-QA inspectors and the validation method used to evaluate BCAP Task Force inspections.
[
Mr. Han stated that the IEOG had found an inspection observation with
-an incorrect elevation stated on it which had been reviewed by the BCAP Engineering group without finding the error. The point was made that the Task Force should not count on catching problems of this type in the Engineering review process.
Mr. Ham stated that he had the understanding
-that BCAP would include the highly stressed items in the Engineering Judgement portion of the reinspection samples under CSR.
Mr. Wallace stated that CECO had planned to prepare a comprehensive presentation on the
-subject of-adverse locations and highly stressed samples which would be presented at the February meeting.
i-This concluded the presentation from CECO and IBOG to the NRC.
At' this time the NRC opened the meeting for questions-to the NRC from the i
Public in attendance.
Mr. D. Cassel expressed a concern that the 180G did not have a complete understanding of how the highly stressed items were being included
- in the reinspection sample under CSR.
0760J 1
Paga 2 of 2 The NRC stated that the lack of a response to highly-stressed-items question during this meeting did not hurt the BCAP Program. They further stated that they would wait uitill the "chruary meeting to address this after the presentation on this topic is made by Ceco.
Mr. Cassel expressed a second concern which applied to the NRC Policy allowing third party independent groups to be hired by the utility rather than being hired by the NRC.
Mr. Cassel said he was not suggesting that BCAP was not operating properly nor was he questioning the integrity or qualifications of the IEOG or BCAP personnel, but rather wanted to express his concerns.
Mr. Forney of the NRC responded to Mr. Cassel's concern and Stated that in the past when the NRC was requested to pick the independent review organization, they (NRC) declined to do so.
He further explained that in the case of the BCAP IEOG, Region III did review the selection.
Mr. Davis of the NRC stated that the CECO selection of the independent review organization (IEOG) for BCAP followed specifically the policy established by the commissioners of the NRC.
There being no further questions the next meeting was scheduled for February 14, at 9:00 a.m.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m.
ge 9
5
~ 0760J '
J
Y Enclosure ~1 List of Attendass NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION R. A. Gardner Reactor Inspector Region III, NRC
- A. B. Davis Deputy Regional Admin.
Region III, NRC W. L. Forney Chief, Projects Section 1 A Region III, NRC E. Greenman Asst. Director Branch Region III, NRC R. J. Lauer Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal
~
L. O. Del George Asst. Vice President CECO D. Cassel Attorney PBI C. W. Schroeder Proj. Lic. & Compliance Supt.
CECO
.P. A. Lau BCAP Q.A.
CECO D. H. Smith Nuclear Licensing Adm.
CECO J. D. Deress Proj. Eng. Mgr, BY/BR CECO V. A. Hoffman Site Manager of SWEC SWEC W. Willoughby BCAP Technical Asst.
SWEC A. Scaccia Off Site Emer. Planner CECO D. L. Leone Projects Eng. Mgr. - BY & BR S&L G. M. Orlov Asst. Director BCAP CECO R. L. Byers Asst. Director BCAP Ceco K. T. Kostal Project Director Braidwood S&L J. L. Hansel IEOG, Project Manager ERC R. E. Ham IBOG, Asst. Project Manager ERC B. R. Shelton Projects Eng. MGR CECO N.- P. Smith General Supervisor - QA CECO
\\-
D. L. Shamblin Proj. Const. Superintendent CECO E. E. Fitzpatrick Asst. Manager QA CECO T. J. Maiman Manager of Projects CECO N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director Ceco D. L. Farrar Nuclear Licensing CECO W. L. Chase Consultant ERC I. M. Johnson Nuclear Casununications CECO M. J. Wallace Project Mgr.
CECO R. R. Minue Nuclear Engineer State of Ill Dept.
Of Nuclear Safety L. Ferguson Utility Engineer I.C.C.
J. Mcdonald Utility Engineer I.C.C.
0*160J b:
i i
)
BRAIDWOOD STATION BRAIDNOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM REPORT PERIOD DECEMBER 1, - DECEMBER 31, 1984 1.
SUfflARY/ STATUS
\\
l This is the sixth monthly Progress Report on the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP), covering the period from December 1, through December 31, 1984.
l During this period, CSR inspections have progressed on an additional five populations, bringing the total to eleven. Preparation of additional inspection packages has continued. Document Review was also initiated during this period. In the RPSR effort, accumulation of construction requirements from the FSAR for checklist preparation was completed. Use of Sargent & Lundy specifications for this purpose is nearing.
completion. Progress continues on all active programs in the RSCAP element.
i As of December 31, the number of personnel assigned to the BCAP effort has risen to 104. Satisfactory office and clerical support continues to
.be available to the BCAP workforce.
)
II.
SCHEDULE ANALYSIS 1
The rescheduling effort was completed during this period. Resources required to support this schedule have been established and authorized for joining the BCAP workforce in January. Personnel additions in l
January will. include five engineers and 16 inspectors.
-III. PERSONNEL AND BOUIPMENT STATUS BCAP manpower totaled 104 as of December 31, 1984. No additional Inspectors were certified during December. Inspection personnel activities included training, accessibility walkdowns, reinspections, document reviews and weld mapping.
The Mapper Data Base, for tracking observations and verification packages, is being updated regularly. Reports are issued monthly, and interim reports are available on an as-required basis, i
IV.
BCAP ELEMENT STATUS i
A.
CSR STATUS During this period, preparation of visual inspection packages and performance of inspections continued. At this time, 11 populations are being inspected: HVAC Ducts, Duct Hangers, HVAC Equipment, Concrete Placements, Small Bore Pipe Configurations, Large Bore Pipe configurations, Large Bore Pipe Rigid Pipe Supports, Large Bore Non-Rigid Pipe Supports, Small Bore Pipe Supports, Conduit and conduit Hangers.
1 r
t
-(0631J)-
e ..
Large bore pipe bolted joints and small bore pipe bolted joints were combined into a single population thus reducing the total populations to 34.
In addition to the 11 populations now bein.g inspected, document review was started for Small Bore Pipe Configuration. Packages for the random portion of the sample are being assembled for two additional reinspection populations and two additional document review populations. Technical review has been completed for 31 of 76 checklists and instructions, of which 14 have been released for reinspection / review.
Initial engineering judgment samples have been identified. Packages were issued and reinspection initiated for four populations. Checklists and instructions for the remaining populations in each discipline are being developed.
During December, the number of certified inspectors remained at a total of.22. This total reflects three Level III and nineteen Level II inspectors. To date 544 inspections have been completed with 765 l
observations recorded.
l B.
RPSR STATUS During December, the RPSR group was primarily involved in developing checklists with construction and personnel qualification /
certification requires,ents from the FSAR and applicable Sargent &
Lundy specifications. This effort consisted of breaking down referenced codes and standards into construction requirements, preparing ten checklists to complete the total number of 29, and resolving open items.
Finalization of the lists requires resolving two remaining open items and then conducting final reviews and signoffs.
Contractor procedures have been assembled for review. Engineers who will be involved are becoming familiar with the general content of l
these documents. The actual comparison of. requirements in checklists to articles in procedures is expected to commence upon finalization of the checklists.
C.
RSCAP STATUS The nine RSCAP programs have progressed as follows:
l a.
Quality Control Structural steel Review - 95%.
b.
Safety Related Pipe Supports - 90%.
c.
NSSS Component Supports.- 70%.-
(0631J) 1 l
~
=
a
~
N 1
, s..
d.
Electrical Installation Documentation Review - 55%.
Quality control Inspector Reinspection Program has been e.
placed on hold.
l f.
Reinspection of Safety Related Mechanical Equipment - 50%
g.
HVAC Welding, configuration, stiffeners, fittings - 50%.
h.
Piping Heat Number Traceability - 50%.
1.
Instrumentation Installation Verification - 30%
V.
PROBLEMS /DISCREPENCY FINDINGS A.
Implementation Problems No specific implementation problems were experienced during this i
period.
B.
Discrepancy Findings As reported in Section IV a total of ~165 observation reports have been written as of December 31, 1984. Of these the review for validity has been completed on 365. Of these, 332 have been determined to be valid discrepancies and have been forwarded to Sargent & Lundy for review for design significance.
To date S&L has not identified any discrepancy as design significant.
l' VI.
RECGGENDATIONS
(
j No specific recommendations are offered at this time.
l n.n.YwAA N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director i
i l
i i
(0631J) i i
--