ML20106J811
| ML20106J811 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/12/1985 |
| From: | Aamodt M AAMODTS |
| To: | Wagner M NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| References | |
| CON-#185-605 SP, NUDOCS 8502190132 | |
| Download: ML20106J811 (3) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
~ (, o 200 North Church Street Parkesburg, Pennsylvania 19365 February 12, 1985 Mary E. Wagner 0
F Counsel for the NRC Staff Nuclear Regulatory Commission y;$
fl6:yg Al1:[z Washington, D. C. 20555 D
l
Dear Ms. Wagner,
We are in receipt of your response of February 4 to our motion of January 15, 1985.
It contains two errors that need to be corrected on the public record.
You incorrectly state at page 6, concerning deletions in the copy of our motion cent for review to the Centers for Disease Control, that The Staff's intent to influence, according to the Aamodts, is shown by the fact that virtually every other page of the Aamodt June 21, 1984 Motion was
~ l not copiad and sent to Dr. Caldwell.
We object to this explanation.
It is incorrect and deceptive.
It compounds the deception to attribute it to us.
Surely, you were aware of our disagreement with this explanation.
Our letter of January 22, 1985 to Allan Greenspun is attached to Iefresh your memory.
The Staff is wrong when it asserted on page 10 at footnote 7 that the Gamble draft reports had been available in the NRC public document room for a number of years.
The Staff knows better.
The drafts were first provided by Three Mile Island Alert during the Remanded hearing this past fall.
Please correct your filing accordingly.
Very truly yours, r
P
$$s/ /J!
Marjorig M. Ramodt cc:
TMI-l Service List Dr. Thomas Cochran 8502190132 850212 PDR ADOCK 05000289
(
)
__ ]..
~
\\
1 f,
- l
'g 1.
g m
~,
- w. ; q
~ j.
R. D. 5,ne, 428 Box Coatesvi Pennsylvania 19320 January 122, if85 I EUCA Alan Greenspun Justice Department Washington, D. C.
~~d-Dear Mr. Greenspun
. ~.. - *...... '-...y
\\
'Please accept our apologies for th9 late provision d ?
l of the enclosed memorandun of January if 1987 and-e'.
attached copy of the Aamodt action of Jun,e 21, 1984..<:. v.j.n When similar material was provided to the AttornerGeneral.S; and the Chief Criminal Division by personal 7 delivert: tom.
i the receptionist in the lobby of the Justice Department'sc6t!.
sain office, the receptionist would not accept 1.tsfoniy O
?
e.z..
n2: U.Yg t>ss W :a.:strQ. r w:/:
The word "similar" in the above paragraph'is used(in(.Ql i
advisedly.
c The copies of'the Aamodt motion provided to"l?
the Attorney General and Chief Criminal Division may not N l
have had the first page of Affidavit 1 included.
If that-i has happened,ly, to represent the ammber and comp be used, sole of pages of the document filed with the NRC. We are -
i certain that NRC received both pages of Affidavit 1 since' they were both included in the copy of our motion sent.'
l to us by i;he-NRC with an August 31, 1984 letter from Winian J..Dircks to the Commissioners.
. Additional information concerning our complaint which we have n' t yet brought to your attention is that.
o d
the pa'se numbers (1 through 12) were asmaing from the f_.'. copy of. our motion sent to us
.i
,. _,_m.__d. ~3 We vill; provide this copy upon, by the NRC on ausm
.J 3
your request.._.
.; p " -- y -
_.. :... 7..
.. _ _ _ g-q..,e- -
.f.N~.R.-5r%hitwouldappearthatthey1enumbersfiledwibwhe C.;). appeared in the original documen were removed @ the copy the NRC sent to CDC. the NRC, J.~.
.s As can be deduced from the September 7, 1984 letter to.:
Dra Caldwen beg' ins by expressing surprise that the NRCDr. Min s, copy of the Aamodt motion and the copy sent by the-Pennsylvania Department of Health were different.
If tho' NRC copy had re<;ained the numbers of the original doctasent,-
~
the missing pages should have been a comparison with another copy.,, discovered aside from a.
s
+
.#4i i
1
_. s.: l l
--e+-~=***'*-"'-*'
~ ~ ~ " - ' " ' ' ~ ~ * ~ ' ' " ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~
~
. l }'.
-.i..
.=
-l.'
.. G.:::, ; r x.:
~.
..cl.::.W % % %~%. 9,
i:
G
~
~
wm:79 v.g.?.
,w i
~
Q;3%3Q,-~~5-*
~'.
- ..: a. :.v. e
\\
, s * =,.* -=e < ' : m -* ' ' *. -
~
- u-
=-
~.. -
.:=...........
Subsequent to the filing of our complaint with the Justice Department, we understand that t:2e NRC has l
atteented to explain the deletion.of pages as due to i
clerical error.
This explanation was provided to various news corresponJonts on or around January 15, 1985.
We request that this gr. apparent attespt'to coverup the I
facts of the matter be investigated.
We understand that the NRC has claimed that our motion was provided on both sides of each page and that its clerka erred in providing CDC with a single side.
In the first place our motion-was served on the NRC with a single printed, side.for eac W -
page.
Secondly, even if b'othesides of each~ page were.. :-'~ 2.
l.
used in the original document, the comission or the backside of each page would not have caused the deletions;which @..:
l were present in the copy NRC supplied.CDC..
., f e 1gp g,,.7g'i.,.
.. s:;,.3 e
We would appreciate an acknowledgement concerningM?'
I the receipt of our complaint, the memorandum of. January.lf,. -
1985 and enclosure, and this letter.
%,.,,. '.yj;j.g,.;.3, q ~.
u.
w...
i Sincerely yours,.
J 'i. '
.c.
i L'
i 9..
.k'
==
- se Marjorie M. Aamodt j
CRISJNML.
St&N8b 1'
J'. -
)
l Norman 0. Aamodt l
ces l
William French Smith
.i Chief. Criminal Division
.....re. w...
L-g)..-c 1 *:.
.'A.".
j l
- h E
%.,.W;% ',..
s
?
. :: - w.
.....n; M E5.;.; ' T. %,,....
w-m E,....ji...
. ~ '
.is.
l-i$.,.. l h*kf$ ?.k,?.$ Y.. -
~~
I
^ *
... n. ye :. -
j
~~
l l'
9
.4 I
i.
l
~.
- e..
.a
^
(- *
.s.
v t
e.
s-4.,
,...--,.,v.-,v.
.w.
,-,.,,-,_.,--,.,.---,.,,,--.,,,,,,,n,
-