ML20106G474

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards fitness-for-duty Program for Period of Jul-Dec 1995
ML20106G474
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 02/22/1996
From: Jain S
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9603050188
Download: ML20106G474 (5)


Text

i i

'AFY M

Telephone (412) 393-6000 Nuclear Group i

February 22, 1996 pp n port. PA 15077M4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatoly Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. I and No. 2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 BV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Fitness-For-Duty Program Six Month Report In accordance with 10 CFR 26.71(d), attached is the Fitness-For-Duty Program Six Month Report for the period of July 1,1995, through December 31,1995.

If there are any questions concerning this report, please contact Mr. E. P. Edwards at (412) 393-5288.

Sincerely, Sushil C. Jain Division Vice President i

Nuclear Services Attaclunent c:

Mr. L. W. Rossbach, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. T. T. Martin, NRC Region I Administrator i

Mr. D. S. Brinkman, Sr. Project Manager 9603050188 960222 PDR ADOCK 05000334 R

pon 04015.]

~

M' 3

l Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data l

Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 l

i 1

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY 12-31-95 compa/V s Monte Ending BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION Locanon FFD Manager Eugene P. Edwards, Mgr. Emp. Relations (412)393-5288 Contact Name Phone (indude area code)

Cutoff s: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)

El Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana

/

Amphetamines

/

/

Cocaine

/

Phencyclidine

/

/

Optates

/

Alcohol (% BAC)

/

Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel l

Average Number with Unescorted Access 1,237 133 108 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre Access 91 0

16 0

127 0

i k

Post accident 0

h Observed behavior 2

1 1

0 Random 288 2

21 0

28 0

Follow-up 4

0 l

Other l

Total 385 3

38 0

155 0

REV.1/92

b 4

A 3

m 5

4 3

2 1

lats s e uT fe o Rt lo s

h i

1 e

oc cn lA a

ts

-7e b

4-id n

u ei S

rl c F

c S

i

- s c

e e e

@in p

.m

.a S

At ro f

s e

t s

a t

ip se O

Te e

v m

i 1

i a

t c

i o

s C

oP an d

a t

1 e

u

]n m

a r

M ifn s

s o

r r

s o

o C

t t

e c

c f

e a

a y

r r

o o

t tn n

l n

p o

o w

m C

C E

o m

m r

e r

d e

e e

k s

T-T-

a n

g r

la t

e n

o e

c t

o h

o r

L L

S T

i B

ll l1illl1l

!ll1 i

t

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY Nuclear Power Division Beaver Valley Power Station FITNESS-FOR-DUTY REPORT PERFORMANCE DATA MRO SIX MONTH REPORT From July 1,1995, through December 31, 1995, our records indicate no confirmed positives in any of the program categories for the short and long term contractor pools.

There were three confinned positives recorded in the licensee pool, two (2) in the Random and one (1) in the For-Cause-Observed Behavior categories.

RANDOM On July 25, 1995, an employee experienced a confirmed positive test result for substance. The employee was denied unescorted access and completed an evaluation by the EAP provider. An intensive out-patient rehabilitation program was completed, and by the recommendation of the EAP, the employee was returned to work on August 28, 1995, and placed in the Follow-up Program. The employee completed two (2) follow-up tests before employment lay-off due to reduction of work force on October 23, 1995.

Unescorted access was not restored.

On December 15, 1995, an employee experienced a confirmed positive test result for substance, was denied unescorted access and placed on indermite suspension. The employee requested the split sample be released and analyzed by the back-up laboratory.

The employee resigned employment December 15, 1995, prior to the result of the split sample which was a confirmed positive test result.

=_ --.

l

\\

FOR-CAUSE - OBSERVED BEHAVIOR On July 13, 1995, a licensee employee experienced a confirmed intoxilyzer positive in 1

the For-Cause, Observed Behavior program. This employee had experienced two (2) disciplinary suspension occasions in the previous two (2) years. The employee was last returned to work in March,1995, under the condition that he would participate in an evaluation by the EAP and comply with any recommendations resulting from the evaluation. The employee's retum to work criteria included drug-alcohol testing at the j

l discretion of Management, which was implemented on July 13,1995, when he failed to report for work as scheduled.

The employee was placed on indefinite suspension and unescorted access denied on July 13,1995, for a confirmed positive test result. On July 25,1995, employment was i

tenninated, due to his overall employment record.

l l

l l

I l

l l