ML20106F975
| ML20106F975 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 10/29/1984 |
| From: | Horin W BISHOP, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS, TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | Ellis J Citizens Association for Sound Energy |
| References | |
| CON-#484-811 OL, NUDOCS 8410300437 | |
| Download: ML20106F975 (2) | |
Text
th b'
RELATED CORRESPONDENCE
.o I9 y
CatkETEC LAW OFFICES OF
@gG BIS HOP, LIBERM AN, COOK, PURCELL & R EYNOLDS l
(200 SEVENTEENTH STREET, N.W.
IN NEW YORK WAS HINGTON, D.C.2OO36 e: SHOP, LIB ERM AN & COON (202)657-9800 usS AvCNut or Twr AMERICA 5 y[ig'gj;'I g; M NEW YORK.NEW YOPn too3e hf TELEX 440574 INTLAW ut us2) 7o4-Os c o 3ShhhN TELEX 222767 W RITER*S 08 RECT De AL a02) 857-9837 October 29, 1984 Mrs. Juanita Ellis President, CASE 1426 South Polk Street Dallas, Texas 75224 t
I Subj:
Texas Utilities Electric Company (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2);
Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 O L
Dear Juanita:
i This will memorialize our agreement regarding the schedule for Applicants' responses to CASE's interrogatories regarding the cross-over leg restraint and CASE's first and second motions for summary disposition regarding quality assurance for design.
As we agreed, Applicants' time to respond to the discovery requests will not begin to run until the Board rules on Appli-cants' motion for reconsideration of the Memorandum and order authorizing discovery. You indicated you intended to respond l
to Applicants' motion. I also spoke with Geary Mizuno on this matter.
He indicated that the Staff also intended to answer Applicants' motion and had no objection to Applicants awaiting a Board ruling before responding to CASE's discovery requests.
With-respect to Applicants' answers to CASE's first and second motions for summary disposition, we agreed Applicants would respond to both motions by November 13, 1984.
Geary Mizuno indicated the Staff had no objection to this schedule.
Following our conversation I contacted Chairman Bloch to relate our agreements.
He indicated to me that the Board was issuing a decision concerning CASE's second motion for summary disposition requesting that Applicants provide infor-mation regarding the subject of that motion, viz., Applicants' retention of an academic expert, by November 9.
Accordingly, Applicants will respond to the Board's request and CASE's second 8410300437 841029 PDR ADOCK 05000445
\\
Q PDR
J!
.?-
2 ts motion-by that date.
We will. submit our answer to the first motion by November 13, as'_we previously agreed.
Since ly, it William A. Horin Counsel for Applicants 4
cc:
Service List.
1
+
4 4
i J
d i
I f
i 1
I J
i 4
{
l I
l i
4 4
E I
l I
I' i
t'.
~.- -- - ---- - - -
- - - ---