ML20106F856

Motion for ASLB to Appoint Gd Eley of Ocean Fleets Svc as Consultant & Witness on Issue 16 Re Reliability of Tdi Diesel Generators.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence

ML20106F856
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	02/11/1985
From:	Hiatt S OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#185-568 OL, NUDOCS 8502140118
Download: ML20106F856 (26)

Text

r

$LD% ',

MSATED OORRESPONDEN(2 o-5-

February 11, 1985

(

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'

'?f rg,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

~

• w L i c e n s i n pEB o ard,3 Berore the Atomic Sorety and

-s 72 6 In the Matter or

)

' c,,,

)

' N THE-CLEVELAND ELECTRIC

)

Docket Nos.'50-440 OL ILLUMINATING CO..ET AL.

)

50-441 OL

)

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant,

)

Units 1 and 2)

)

MOTION FOR THE OPPOINTMENT OF BOARD' WITNESS I.

INTRODUCTION Intervenor Ohio Citi: ens for Responsible Energy-('OCRE')

hereby moves.the Licensing Board to oppoint as its own

-consultant and witness on Issue M16 Mr. George Dennis Eley or Ocean Fleets Services.

OCRE would call tir. Eley os its own expert._ witness.but for the poucity off0CRE's runds.

It'is thus necessary for the Board'to coll.Mr. Eley as its own' witness to truirul its mandate to-decide _ issues based on o full and' complete' record and t o.I Prov'ide OCRE with due.irocess..

II. DISCUSSION-A.

OCRE's Need ror Expert Witnesses The Board is obviously owore or the complex.and technical

~

nature'or.the'Transomerico Delovol' diesel generator issue.

No

-doubt the Board 15 0150' owore or.the Substantial resources'

-Applicants and Starr. have expended in studying the TDI engines 8502140118 850211

-ond: components.thereor.

PDR ADDCK 05000440 g

PDR

. F o r: example,. Applicants:in their Motion.ror Summary Disposition or Issue #16 have-submitted no less-than 4.

a 3

i i.

i 7

offidavitssattesting'to the purported reliability.of the TDI' 4

engines based on onolyses,-tests, or inspections performed by

, 8 the-offiants.

Applicants rely not only on the TDI DG owners.

~

g Group. which, by Applicants' ossessment, has mounted on effort

" spanning over o year's time and drawing upon the input from o-

' variety'of-high quality technical consultants and involving more than o hundred engineers and technicions" (Hotion at 7), but 7.

oiso on on independent engineering consultant, Southwest Research Institute.

4 Similarly, the.NRC Staff has utilized the Pocific Northwest 4

Laboratory to perform technical evoluotions of the Owners Group program ond analyses.

2 OCREi on the other hand, does not hove the financial A

technical ~evoluotion of-the TDI resources to commission its own DCs.

OCRE-barely-hos enough money;to. cover the costs of documents and pos'~toge 'needed for porticipation in this proceeding.. So, without'the relief requested.herein,'OCRE~will

-not be able.to-present offirmative evidence to buttress'its l

Jclaim the the' Perry DGs are unreliable.-

l Applicants of course will hove no trouble presenting-

. Witnesses defending-the reliability of the' Perry'DGs.

Nor will 1

thezStoff', which has supported the.opplicantsHon this issue in-

~

other~licensin9' proceedings. : The resultant record will.be

' filled withyevidence supporting the' claims of. Applicants, with s.

2$J y-5

s.

- S-none supporting OCRE's. claims.

.-j 15ince-the' Licensing-Board's decision must be based upon the.

s

, record (10 CFR 2.760(c), Pacir'ic' Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo

.Conyon' Nuclear Power-Plant. Unit 2), ALAB-254, 8 AEC l'1 8 4, 1187

' (19 7 4 ) )', 'the 8 cord will have no choice but to rule in Applicants's favor.-

Appel10te review of the Board's decision s

willibe-to no avail, os the " substantial evidence

• test or 5 USC

-706 - (2) (E) 'will have been met.

See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park. Inc. v.

Volpe, 401 U.S.

402, 414, 416 (1971) ("the i

' ultimate standard o f' review is a narrow one.

The court is not

> empowered to substitute its judgement for that of the agency.').

-Thus, due to the impecunious circumstances of.the only party

^

f Iwhich-could present a different. Opinion on-thelreliability of i

j thesPerry diese11 generators,.this proceeding will become-o meaningless chorode with o foregone conclusion.

Our nation

. expects more from its legal system.

.B.'Th'e-Witness Sought c-

)CRE requests that ~ the Board: coll'Mr. George. Dennis Eley

-(ondIony'ossociates who may also be needed> of Ocean Fleets' Services. OCRE has ottoched'its Jonuary:18,.1985? letter to Mr.

Eleycrequesting his-services os Exhibit 1. -

Mr. Eley's-response is. attached as Exhibit 2.

Ocean Fleets. served as expert

, y vconsultant'ond witnesses on TDI:DGfreliability. to intervenore Suff.olk Countyfin the:Shorehom 0L proceeding.

.The professional s

s s

J g.

A e

s n

~

. v

~ ~ ~ '

~ ~ ~ " - -

s s -.... _

Equalirico.tions of'Mr. Eley and Mr. Aneesh Bokshi, also of Ocean

_ Fleets, have..been att'oched as Exhibits 3 and 4, respectively.

s Ocean Fleets has gained substontial experience with TDI,DGs nos:o result of the Shoreham proceeding, wherein Messrs. Eley ond

. Bokshi testified on diesel engine design, manurocture, and

' operation, and crankshafts and cylinder blocks.- Ocean F.leets

.will be availab'le to work on this proceeding ofter the third

~

week oroFebruary, according to'Mr. Eley's' letter.

Becouse of

.their extensive experience with this issue. Ocean Fleets con

'probably complete its evoluotion of'the Perry DGs in accordance Ewith'.. the. Board's. Proposed hearing schedule.

-The-testimony presented in~the Shoreham proceeding by Ocean Fleets consultants revealed serious deficiencies in.the:onalyses-

'of the'0wners' Group and the.NRC Staff.

See " Joint Direct

+

iTestimony.of Dr. Robert N 'i - A n d e r s o n, Professor _ Stanley:G.

~

G.bennis'Eley,.Aneesh Bokshi,- Dale G.

Bridencough)

Christensen, r^ ' and Richard B.

Hub' bord Regarding'isuffolk County's Emergency, E-

Diesel Generator Contentions *, doted J u l y :- 3 1. - 1 9 8 4.- Thus,, :their s po'.wicipation-in.this' proceeding;wil'l providerthe full spectrum ond-fair decision by-

-of. expert? opinion necessoryffor'o, reasoned r

rj. - '

[thisJBoo d.

{:

"C.10CRE's:VInobility=to Poy for:.the-Witness

'As1 indicated'in/Mr.'Eley'scletter, Ocean-Fleets-charges from>

for is45?tonsB54-per.; hour.for"consultoney work,;ondi4100 Per hour 1

P

+

1

'I

~

O.

'l.*b 'N'

+0 N.w '-memN w,*rn-

'"~ PUMUWd v 1)

+

3-.

- 4: - -.'

This.is in addition to any expenses hearingiappearances.

incurred.

Exhibit 5 consists of information provided by Mr.

Eley concerning time spent and expenses incurred in_the Shorehom

.cose.. Note that these typify the busiest period of that

~ proceeding.

Consultancy time ranged from 201 to 5,87-hours.

s Expenses exceeded $1000 per month.

To get on; ideo of the mimimum costs involved if OCRE were to

~ Lutilire._0cean Fleets

• services, consider using one consultant, hours and 16 hearing hours ot $65'.per hour,.for 200 consultancy

(2 days).

Consultancy fees would equal $13,000s hearing f ees, -

.$1600.

Assume expenses are equal-to $750.

The total.is H15,

..350,-osain_ot.o.mimimum.

This-sum for exceeds the value of; for exceeds the-tokoi amount of funds

'This. sum

'OCRE's coffers.-

"which-0CRE-has been able to raise in-the last 4 years.

In fact.

~

'let.olone-

.0CRE is. unable'to pay-for even one month's expenses, i f e e s..:,

D'espite'OC'RE's desire: to present :the best.coseJpossible on-N

Issue ' N16',. 0'CRE f inds li t financiallycimpossible to do so.'_

Hence

.n

_:the. ins tant ;reques t.

2 Indeed,'OCRE finds itself in-the some position as:the_

.s, t

d l

.g States Marsho11s' Service'v.'Meon's,-724 F2d'

'oppe11eestinfUnited (8th Cir.,-1983)inorr>d on reheoring.741_F2d11053';(1984).:

~1762' The. defendants [Meons et al.3 hover.notmoneytto bringtony.

. Witnesses to the : trials a the -Government has ' brought: and cis bringing 0;-number.of witnessesEto testifyI the defendants'have s

. no'moneyito"poy;evenlthe-expenses of': friendly' expert.witnessess'

• ~ ~ '

im n~ -

i-m _

~~~~~ S-m w

>v--**+#~

-. d '.. - J,,4 h.,Ml A $~dz g',

r9 L

4%:

"ye.,

g 4,,

8

+

p.

z...

p

- - ~ ~ -

.,._._._.__.~.:-

without money, there will be no witnessess without witnesses, there'will be:no defenses without a derense, the Government must prevail.

724 F2d at 647.

J The court ruled that the government must, in all foirness,

-poy ~for'Heans' witnesses, citing statutory authority.

Legal 7.

ovenues likewise' exist in this proceeding to assure tho_t_ justice

'will~be' odvanced.

1 III. WHAT'THE LAW REQUIRES A. Due Process to the.' constitution states that no The:Fifth Amendment

1. p e r s o n - s h a l l

• be ' deprived of life,' liberty, or property, without due. process'of law."

The' licensing of the Perry Nuclear Power f their is on action threatening,to deprive OCRE members o

-Plant:

~

the toxic and:

J 1'ives.. ( thr ou g h cotostrophic occidents or by icarcinogenic..noture of rou' tine. emissions of ioni::ing - radiation),.

i p

~

,, lib e r t y -- ( the freedom to live in'o healthy environmen t),. and contaminot' ion-and/or confiscotion following o

? proper'ty --(through cotostr0Phic occident'or by the.devoluotion of property'so:

This i.

"imperiledEond polluted by' routine-radioactive emissions).,

pursuont to Section:189 of'the Atomic Energy q

. Proceeding, held

'Act, f-the Administrative Procedure Act f.and2thejcommission's-rules lo OCRE's_Pi9 hts-w pr.actice,fis--the.due process mechanism by;Which

+

' ' i

'-l "are protected.

._ t h e

The:. Supreme Court.has interpreted due process-os;being I.

i' g.,

m

'1.

S~

s

~

?

..a___

._3

l. ? t

,,,,._w,_

v4-

~ - 4 % s. -.. w.dja,,

n_,_____

,.; ;f

l

~S ~ c

• 4 t.

1 n.-...;,.

opportunity to be heard, at o meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.

Armstrong v.

Manzo, 380 U.S.

545 (1965).

The opportunity to be heard must also be tailored to the capacities and circumstances of those who are to be heard.

Goldberg.V. Kelly, !?7 U.S.

254 (1970).

Compare' Union-of concerned scientists v.

NRC, case No.82-053. DC Cir, May 25, 1984, (cert. denied ___U.S.___)

slip op, at 19:

the Commission is entitled to great freedom in its efforts to structure its proceedings so os to maintain their integrity while assuring meaningful public porticipotion, but one of its goals must -to be to assure that there-is meaningful public f

porticipation.

(Emphasis in Original.)

.It is obviously not meaningful when 2 parties to a' proceeding have the resources'to present a case but the party

- with the most to lose _is destined to. lose because of its'

. financial i n o b'ili ty to present' evidence.

'A meaningful opportunity to be heard requires that this proceeding be a

tailored ;to the financial copocities and-circumstonces of OCRE byrcolling OCRE'S Prospective witnesses 05 Board witnesses and

,poying the costs.

~

Denial of a party's right to present.its evidence and summon the witnesses of its choice is o denial of due process.

Union

-Bog-Com'p' Paper corporation v.

FTC.'233 F.Supp 660, 666 (S.D.N.Y.

1964)..

It clearly m'okes little difference whether this denial

~

stems 1From the. improper action of on odJudicatory.-tribunal or; s

^" ~ ~ ~ ~ '

~

. ~ - - -.

-g-

.from its inoction which Preserves on unfair situation such CA

'erein.

The end result is the same.

h that B. The NRC's Statutory Mondate to Protect the Public that Commission's unique function is The Nuclear Regulatory of protecting the public health and safety from those ho ords associated with.the use of nuclear power to generate electricity.

Pacific Gos and Electric Co.

v.

State Energy Commission, 51 LU 4449, Resources conservation & Development 4453 (April 19, 1983).

This Licensing Board also has this the criterio for issuonce of an responsibility. ' Compare, e.g.,

operating license by the Commission in 10 CFR'50.57(o) with those enumero'ted in 10 CFR 2.104 (c) for consideration by the presiding officer.

It' has long been held tint administrative agencies are and in so doing

-entrusted with the protection of'the public, must,not limit their vision to the' horizons of-the Private Michigan Consol'idated Gos'Co.

v.

porties'in-the proceeding, FPC, 283 F2d 204, 226 (DC.Cir. 1960).

Rother, the ogency'5 decision.must'be' based on a complete record if the-Ogency is

~

in serving the Public interest.

properly.to discharge its duty FPC.'354 F2d ~608, 612

~ scenic' Hudson Preservation Conference V.

(2nd.Cir. 1965).

g expressed in Isbrandtsen Co.

v.

fThis principle has been best United States, 96 F.Supp. 883, 892 (S.D.N.Y.

1951):

~

i*'

5 -

_9_

s CAdministrative agencies] ore not expected merely'tlo call balls and strikes,.or to' Weigh the evidence submitted by the porties and-let the scales tip as they.will.

The agency does not do its duty _when i t merely decides upon.a poor or-nonrepresentative record.

As the sole representative of the public, which is a third party in these proceedings, the ogency owes the duty to

. investigate all the pertinen't facts, and to see that they are adduced-when-th'e parties have not put them in.

The ogency must'always act upon the record mode, and if that is not

-sufficient, it should see that the record is supp1'e'mented before

-it-acts.

These principles'have'receiveclwide acceptancesin our legal system.

See, e.g.,

the Manual-ror Administrative Low Judges, Revised Ed. 1982, prepared for the Administrative Conference of 4

the United States by Merritt Ruhlen at 3:

f on Admi6istrative Low-Judge has a strong offirmative' duty not only to try.o cose fairly and to write o sound decision but to insure that on occurate and complete record is developed (citing Scenic Hudson, supro).

. Especially see pp.21-22, which specificolly refers to NRC proceedings.and the necessity of having a' complete record,' which may.~be accomp'lished either by the Board colling,its own witnesses;or ~ instructing the Parties to adduce' additional

evidence, Indeed,--the Federal Rules-of Evidence.have embodied ' this:

.p.

~concep't.. Rules'614 and 7061specifically. empower'the courts to

~ coll ~ Witnesses either suo.sponte or.on:the' motion ofl-ony party..

MThe purpose of-these rules'is'to ensure that;'the Judge-is not

~

-Jimprisonedlwith'in the cose os. made by - the ? por ties ', 'and this power'han-been colled'* crucial to prevent. impairment of.the: -

\\p '

fact-finding' process.'

Meons,'supro,?741 F2d at 1050.-

r g

i b -.

,P"

• *MW#*-'#

d

. h m.

'n'

_e

_q d-

. ~

I

...s.

i

=;

-h-Thus, it is neither in the public interest nor in accordance A

'With the' low-for the Board to decide this case on the basis of

~ evidence presented-by Stoff and Applicants While ignoring

-contradictory-evidence which OCRE Would prorfer but for its lock u

of_ money.

Such action *is not fair play for Cthe Board 7 to

' create.on in' Justice, instead of remedying one, by omitting to

~ ' inform itself and by acting ignorantly When intelligent action

'is'possible.* ' 'Isbrandtsen, supro (96 F.Supp o t' 892).

. Without'the relief requested ~by OCRE, the scales of justice in this proceeding Will tiP to the. side havingLthe Weight of-t

.Such-lock of dollars, and not necessarily the Weight of truth..

. fairness cannot be tolerated in on administrative agency subject

• to thT'iiFBGisl6ns.'of The Adailnistfative ProcedUfe~Act.

~

~ ~It'is ~

' ~ ~

,also! contrary to the NRC's statutory mandate to; protect the.

public interest. 'For OCRE's participction in this case to be.;

c stmeaningfulpin-ciding;the NRC-in protecting-the.public,

-oppointmenttof the: Board-~ Witness.soughtfis' essential.

.(Compare 7 M,.supro,'

• We believe Congress. Vested--in'the'public~-

asEWellios.:the-NRC'Stofr, a-rolelin assuring-lsofe.. operation ofj

', inuclear,. power > plants.

Siipl op.- a t 22f C..;NRC Case-low the llow - o f ' this.. ogency ' tha t, When on intervenor Would.

I.h t i s

collion expert Witness ibut f or [ financial lock,1 the

B' cord should

[.

icall1-the-(Witness,osTits ownLand poy the'oppropriate' costs.

~

f f'

r'^%-M'W' g.

k

• {

. _. -. _ + - _ -

-p-Consumers Power Co._ (Midiond Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-382, 5

-NRC 603, 607 (1977).

This is the only remedy consistent with the NRC's "Poromount consideration', the search for truth.

Ibid. ot 608.

This CPPT-occh hos been freely employed.

See, e.g.,

Pacirie Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1

-ond 2), ALAB-604, 12 NRC 149 (1980) (ACRS consultant testified as Board witnesses at intervenors' request); Public Service Co.

of New Hompshire (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-667, 15 NRC 421 (1981) (ACRS consultant colled as Board witness or intervenor 's reque's t) ; Southern California Edison _(San onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3), LBP-82-3, 15 NRC 61 (1982) (ACRS consultant appeared os Board witness).

The Board should not construe South Carolino Electric and

- C o s_-

( V i r g i l C. Summer Nuclear-Station, Unit 1), ALAB-663.'14 NRC 1140 (1981) as o prohibition on colling Board witnesses.

What

'wos prohibited in Summer was a Board colling independent witnesses suo sponte without first affording the Porties to the Proceeding-on opportunity "to supplement their testimony.

In

%rd fact.the Appeal expressly distinguished between such suo sponte A

oction and colling a witness'which intervenors wanted to have heard.

In. AL AB-710. -17. NRC 25 -(1983), the Appeal Board offirmed the Summer ALSB's decision, with these comments on the Board witness A.-. w _. _ _ _ _ _,

l

-t4-

. question:

licensing boards of course have the authority to call witnesses of their own.

This is necessary for the fulfillment of our shored 9001 of a fully developed record on matters of,sorety and environmental significance.

The Appeal Board did-qualif y. o Licensing Board's power to C011 independent. witnesses suo sponte, in that the Board first must give,the,porties to the proceedin9 every opportunity to clorify or supplement previous testimony and show why it connot reach on

, informed decision without independent witnesses.

Thus, the

~

Summer decisions are not applicable to this situation in that the witnesses are sought by OCRE.

IV. CONCLUSION

.The discussion obove ' clearly demonstrates that the Licensing Board must call Mr. George Dennis Eley.or Ocean F l e e t s S e r v i'c e s a

to serve os o' Board witness on diesel generator reliability.

4 Without-Mr. Eley's-testimony,- the Board wi11 have to decide this

~

~

and in ignoron'ce of;the serious issue}on on incomplet,e. record flows:in: Applicant and Storr evoluotions or the Perry DGs.

Such on action.would be contrary to'the.due process clause of the the NRC's statutory mondate to protect the Public Constitution, interest, and NRC cose low.

OCRE is confident.that this Board Would not-toke such;on

'mproper' course..

i

,3 v

Respectfully submitted,

~

f.s A i-

~

~5uson L.~Hiatt OCRE~ Representative,

~

ARS2ctrwmcr.LFvL

-j

mn

a.

.v

/b)CN/d / 7

.Jonuary 18, 1985

~Nr.

George Dennis Eley

' Ocean Fleets Consultancy Service

'1501'.Grondview Avenue

-Midationtic' Corporate Center Thororare, NJ 08086

DearLMr. Eley:

The1 undersigned represents Ohio Citi= ens for Responsible Energy

?('0CRE*). O public interest intervenor in the operating l'icense proceeding currently before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Sofety and Licensing Board for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant:near Cleveland, Ohio.

The Perry facility is using two

emergency diesel generators manufactured by Transomerico Delaval, Inc (DSRV-16 machines rated at 7000 kW) per unit to

' meet;the NRC's requirements for onsite electric power, proceeding %alleging 100RE hos o contention admitted in the Perry that the TDI DGs are unreliable, We are interested in your services os o consultant and expert witness to perform analyses.

of'the/ Perry TDI diesels ~and-to offer. testimony in any NRC hearing. held on this subject, os well as to assist in preheoring funct' ions such as providing ofridovits or assistingcin the

~

preparation of cross-examination or utility and NRC starr

, witnesses -

Specifically,'your'onalysis.would encompass the following oreos:

J1. review.or reports ofLthe.TDI~0wners Group and their

' consultant..Foilure Analysis Associates, and of the NRC Storf

'a n d i ts1 consultants, Botte11e Paciric. Northwest Loboratories, on-

'theidesign adequacy of'various components.or.the.TDI'V-16.

engine, particularl'y the piston skirts, ' cylinder heads,

-crankshorts,-cylinder blocks,:PUshirods,-connecting rads,-engine L

Lbose ond; bearing cops', and'turbochorger;.

2, review of f the-monuf acturing :and linsto110 tion. his tory of the

-Perry TOI: engines, 'especially for?those components listed cbove, including other components-or: practices ~which could offect,the.

.reliabili ty, of' those (components.

-3.. Performance 1of1 independent analyses,; inspections,;or

'calculationstwhen.;needed to" determine-the reliability of'the

' engines or ony component,thereof,>

4.ireview of the~0wners Group ' Phase ~II' or/ Design

~

Review /Qualit'y Revolidation report for'the Perry engines.

~

s5.=-review of the results oritests-(including operosional tests)

~

[Jand-inspections 1 performed'on.the-Perry. engines.

.We,would like onlestimate or/the~ costs of your' services os-outined: obove,.= including. your es timat'e o,f' the ' expenses-you wouid 4

-. incur;in. performing-theseEservices.

We would-alsoElikeion

^ estimate of[when you;could'begin. work'on:this-case 1ond-'when youer work would;be. completed,

.LHP of. course' realize that yourifisrt,

?commitmentcisito the: Shorehom proceeding.- ~However,1while no

-: ?.

t 's,

=

p-m 7-

t-p.

. w

'Poge 2 hearing date has been set for Perry, we suspect that hearings might be held this springs in addition, we might need your services for-preheoring mothers, such as providing on offidavit in response to utility or NRC motions for summary disposition.

We.look[forWord to your' reply, Sincerely,

-Susan L..Hiatt-

.0cRE Representative 8275 Munson Rd.

tien tor, OH - 44060 (216) 255-3158 4

s c

1 O '

.N S

b1

~

j

Ocean Fleets Services

~

P.O. Box 247 1301 Metropolitan Avenue A Division of Ocean Cory Inc.

Thorofare, New Jersey 08086 Telephone: (609) 848-2913 Telex: 6971078(W.U.)

January 29, 1985 Ms. Susan L. Hiatt hgg 3 (T 1 OCRE Representative 8275 '4unson Road Menter, Ohio 44060

Dear Ms. Hiatt:

We confirm receipt of your letter dated 18th January, 1985, concerning the operating license proceedings cur'rently before the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Atomic Safety and Licensing Board and note that 0. C. R. E. has a contention admitted in the Perry proceedings alleging that the Emergency Power T. D. I.

D. G.'s are unreliable.

As you are already aware that the area of the work enumerated in your letter is similar in nature to that already peformed by our company, I shall restrict this response to estimates of costs incurred in so doing.

We would however, request that you submit a copy of the contention together with the grounds on which it was admitted, irrespective of whether our services are retained.

For services as enumerated below, we have a standard daily fee which varies from $85 00 per hour to $65 00 per hour dependent upon the Consultant involved.

e Provision of Affadavits Assisting with preparation of cross examination e

Review of reports from Owners Group, Failure e

Analysis Associates, N.R.C. staff and B. P. N. L.

on the design adequacy of T. D. I.

V16 components Review of the manufacturing and installation history e

of the Perry T. D. I.

Diesel engines and possibly the effect on reliability of components other than those listed above Performance of independent analysis, calculations e

and inspections as required Review of Owners Group DRQR for Perry e

Review of Operational Tests and Inspections on Perry e

Engines MD AA C4en Company

l Ms.- Susan L. Hiatt Page 2 0CRE Representative With regard to the total costs incurred on a project of this nature, for your information we have submitted a five monthly break down of our work performed for Suffolk County which typifies the busiest period and the extent of coverage needed.

In addition, we have submitted typical monthly expense sheets that are billed at cost to our Clients.

Please note however that the Shoreham case has so far extended over a-ten month period and has involved three of our Consultants each working on a particular assignment.

In addition to the above our fees for court appearances, giving testimony and deposition would be $100 per hour.

Availability for this work would be after the third week in February thereafter the extent of which we would allocate and agree to dependent upon the requirements of

- the case.

Our general opinion,. based on your. preliminary letter and our-existing knowledge that some of the components are generic, is that the involvement needed to complete the tasks in hand would be proportionately less than that provided on the Shoreham Case.

We trust the enclosed will suffice.

Should you-require

- any further.information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours sincerely, s

G. D. Eley-g ~-'

(TechnicalManager

\\

E s

b t

r 4

.s i-lex.as N 3 i

c0NrTDENTTAL

'l EES2EE Name:

George Dennis Eley Address:

117 Bortons Road Marlton, New Jersey 08053 3

Home Phone:.

(609) 768-6699 f,.

Business Phone:

(609) '848-2913,

Licenses and cer*4*ic=t==:

Co=bined First Class Certificate of' Competency Steamship & Motorship.

Higher National Certificate in Mechanical Engineering.

soefety

-]

M=+=-ehics:

Associate Member of The Institute of Marine Engineers.

Member of the Institute of Port

~

Engineers. Ma-Her of the ASTM Task Group on Pollution'Abatsment Equipment (F25.ll).

f N iew nt wiwee-v 1981 - 1983 Marine Consultant with:-

Head Office:- Ocean Transport and Trding PI4.

India Buildings Water Street l.

Liverpool, Englarid L20RB li Telephone No. 011-44-51-236-9292 M'-

Address of U.S.A. Office:-

l Ocean Fleets Consultancy Service 1501 Grandview Avenue Midatlantic Corporate Center Thorofare, New Jersey 08086 elephone Nos.

(609) 435-6457 & (609) 848-2913 h,-

i t

0 I

O 4

1 m.m.mJ

t.

l_

l Paga 2 t

3 1969 - 1981: - Third Assistant, 2nd And Chief Marine Engineer with above Company, i

1966 - 1969: - Estimator and Contracts Engineer for British Shipbuilders at:-Austin & Pickersgill Limited Shipbuilders and Installation Engineers P.O. Box 38 l

Southwick 1

Sunderland 4

Tyne & Wear, England j

Telephone Nos.

011-44-783-57684 l

1959 - 1966: - Apprentice Fitter & Turner, then Contracts Engineer with:-

George Clark & N.E.M., LE.

l P.O. Box 8 j

Korthumberland Engine Works i

Wallsend, Northumberlan, England elephone No.

011-44-966-623141

.p -= -v ef we-k r-n-i.ac. & Accom!few.-es As a Marine Consultant with Ocean Transport & Trading, my duties have included:-

Negotiation and formation of a joint venture with the American j

Bureau of Shipping to provide fuel services to the marine industry.

,j My responsibilities have been to negotiate with Senior Officers of.

q ABS and to formulate operational policy. My duties also include coordination of the various departments and efficient operation of the business.

I have implamented the Data Bank System for the 1

above business and control the staff so doing.

I also act an'an s

j independent consultant on machinery damage investigations and run

[

f,'.

seminars for the following establishments on fuel technology.

i-l 1.)

• Kings Point Merchant Marine Academy' on Professor i

a Christenson's ' Continuing Education on Diesel Technology" given to chief engineers studying for advanced certification.

[

2.) ' Maritime Safety International lecturing'to chief and port l

engineers on poor quality' fuel oil..

r 3.)

Marine Engineers Benefit Association to chief and port

! (j engineers on poor quality fuel oils.

j

.:l i

.~ 1

'~

.-n.

s A

. l

!aga 3 l

t In addition I advise on system design for ships enginercoms and upgrade existing vessel so that they have full operational capability on lower cuality fuel.

I have worked in this capacity with =ajor American shipping ec.:panies and nor= ally negotiate the contracts for so doing with the vice presidents of those respective companies.

)

Prior to my employment as a Consultant, I was employed by the same I

company for 12 years as a Marine Engineer in all capacities up to th'e rank of Chief Engineer.

In this capacity my responsibilities

.j were for the efficient operation and. maintenance of various diesel engines, boilers, air compressors, refrigeration systems which encompassed a high degree of automation.

Coordination with different marine and hull classification societies.was also a

I requirenant as was the effective i=plementation of planned maintenance scheduling.

Before continuing my career at sea, I was employed by British Shipbuilders as a Contracts Engineer.

During this period, my responsibilities were to produce ships specifications for newbuildings to a potential owners requirements, and also to handle all ships contract correspondence.

It was also my

~'

responsibility to esti= ate the costs of various building projects and sub:.it these costs for negotiation with the owners representatives.

Prior to my employ =ent with British Shipbuilders, I served an j -

Engineering Apprenticeship with George Clark & N.E.M.

L*D., a Marine Enginebuilder.

On completion of my apprenticeship I

'i-continued as a Draughtsman with this same company in the Engine

.j Design Department until I was promoted to contracts Engineer with duties s4-41ar to those held at British Shipbuilders.

, )

\\

l-

4 i

I [ d, I

f-t-

d

~

L 9

o - _..

M d(. H @ ( T h 8

'425U's!

s

\\

l Phone (3) 201-3L3 3333

.W q 2AI52I (2) 609_799_3fi33 D-

,I L1ch Tcx Run.1.a.1ve,. C5n,c.

...1.ns cc ro,.

c CERSCNiL Age - 30 Irs., Height - 3'11", '.Velghc - 16L Lbs.

DM.CDC""

6, l

1982 - 1983 MARETI SURbC3 AND TICETICAL CCNSULTA.Y_"

j T.J.D. I terprises, N. Jersey.

Naticnal Marine Consultants, N. Jersey.

y:

I 1978 - 1981 CEIIT INGn - - </?c3T EiGET-- 4 Arya Naticral Shipping Lines, LONDON, IT.I.

1977 - 1978 SICOND INGG ~ / ASSISTANT PROJICT EIGIL--s.

Eapal Management Pvt.Ltd., SINGAPCRI (* sPIL SII3I.E 1974. - 1977 nw INGEi~~3..

Scindia Stea: a d Na'iigation Co.Ltd,. 305r. AT.

1969 - 1973 D GB --4 APF -'iTICI Sci:H= 53:ipyard, ECV.LZ.

SU?"_A:7 OT "IO:< EX:E" IE!CI & ACCOWJ5E?.*INTS As ' arine. surveyor and tech::. cal ccustita.:t,. du-des include cecrM -' ting va-icus tack" e.7 re7sd-s sci car:: r_:g out h" and cars su.veys.

As-chief l

e gineer/ pert engineer wo&nd c varict.s diese2.

engizes, bc1Ler, at: cc=pressics 1:d :s.w_gers.f_c::,

L s7stens enc==7m** at a kd I" de s ee o f au.tc=m.t_' cs.

Eespcnsible fo:- the operatics,

-*d -te"*-ce and subsecuer repcrts-af al

=ackdaer7.

Mcnitored s paper work relating to. the eng.se and perse::el.

Ist cduced a cost-effective l*-

ed -ad"te-s-ce l

a d inventory cont:cl system'.

I: 71ev'of. 7 streng c.=x2,yY_c?1 e. d professic r.1 e.kilities, pre cted z.s-the youngest ch:.ef engineer i: _the ec=.any Shipyard experience includes, inchm n cf dry-deck-repai s-and supervision af ew cc:struetics r_th

.as enrk=9 in the piping design and ec:-des: necive testing depart =ests.- Also coordinaced with. differe::

=ari= e and. h"' ' classificatics societics du-_*:g -

pla.= approval-and surveys DUCATTCN 1982 STATI us.t.vu.SITY OF ITI?/ YCEI, MAR TE3I CC" GI,. 7.I.

M.S., 4:. Ma-ine Transportatic: ?#'-*senest.

197.8 50UTE 575 MARINE. & TICINICAL CO--?GI, U.I.

3.5 1: Marine I:g.neering (Chief Ingineer's-Id. cense',

1969 - 1972

- MARDI INGD - " wG TICENICAL COLLIGI, 30F.:*.kI.

1968 EIGI 5CIOCL,

'C'-~ L"VILS, UNIVI25ITT OF CA'CERIDGI, I

~

WO:7 IX:I INCI 1982 - 1c83

.J.D.

Interprises, :7. Jersey.

Natic:al

'J=--*=

Ccasul:as:s, N. Jersey.

.resently werki:g as -=

d-=

surveyor and technical i

consultant.

7/ork includes inspection a:d survey of hull, cargo and =achinery.

Also interface ac'ad'ery repairs between ship and shcre.

Res;c=sibilities also e:cc= pass car.ylsg out various feasibility studies for =achinery perfc =ance

=esitoring systems.

1977:- Ic81 Arya National Shioping Tines, LONDON.

Iapal Manage =en: Ivt.itd., SINGA?GRI (.u..- ;IT., S ???A2-SETTTA?D AND CMTNT3TTATIVE EX5ERIINCI

.t 1-I=;1cyed as chief e:ginecr and certified fcr =c:cr vessels of any horse power.

Staa= generatics experience includes operatics, =ainte=a=ce and survey of different low and high pressure boilers and related =achinery - se=e of the= being Babcock

& 711ccx, Scotch and Cochra: type betlers.

c

~

The ships worked c: were se=1 to fully aute=ated.

I was responsible for the superrisics of eleven pecple in the engine rec =.

J

repairs were effected c: beard, a result of tact and effective dealing with the va-icus

"-d c: crew.

Repai s so. ='ly'eculd be u=da-'d-ad as everhaul o f== d " a=d a"* ' d = 7 engine " d ts, air ec=presscrs,

a"* ' d = y pumps and pu=;ing syste=s.

Also was res;cusible for the efficient r"--d g and i

=ai te=ance of the air cc ditio d"g and free: and

) -

a==ctia refrigeration pla:ts.

l I: the shipyard was ischarge of ec=;lete i y-deck repairs includd g propeller a:d tail end shaft removal and 4==pectics.

Also supervised.

cc=struction of ad -d -bulk ca r:.ers.

Worked is the pip 1=g design and plan approval'. departments.

Co'crui ated with different classification scciet'.es

]

for.as: cal and five yearly surveys.

Was auther-1:ed to certify =achd aery for fulfd" d "g d -aurance recuire=ents for various classificatic: societies..

c As port / chief engineer =c=itered all paper work t

relating to the operatic: of the boilers and 0

ecgines such as oil ce=sumption, indenting spare sea voyage -and parts, perfor=ance reports s

a --

fi a1-analysis reports.

3 di E e.:.:.a. h C I S Available c: request.

I U hb5 O [ 4,bJ/f3k J.

/

1

~.

8

. opt

-F+.

a--w-<ew,--w-rr.-,--rm-w..,re--

ewew e en 1rw-e ru ---

e,-,w.

- + - -

m m o c n o,

.... i i SERIAL NUMUER County of Suffolk, Ne' York - Standard Vaucher w

640761 P,

,,t

,und No.

Br Trans Fund Appropriation Sub.otdact Enc.No.

Enc. Liquidated Amount Payable 1099 Idor No.

RtR (T 6 Icher No.

~

chend J

. Vouchu No.

2 l Payee identification g

DO NOT Pay to:

to Name OCEAN FLEETS SERVICES or Social Security No WRITE IN ANY AREA 1301 METROPOLITAN AVENUE 13-3138464-ENCLOSED reis 3

Payee Referetus' -

BY RED THOROFARE, NEW JERSEY 08086 LINES.

is Zip Code DOCKET NO. 50-322 OL Ca sh disec u nt.............. %.............. D a ys. Deliv e ry Te r m s:

vendor Contact Phana No.

1 Contract No.

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL / SERVICE Purchase Order If items are too numerous no be incorporated in tne block below Oesntity D'*

NO-use form A.C.,1 A and carry Total Forward No. and Date MARCH 1984 i

C_

S CONSULTANCY HOURS 201 (Contract r)

APRIL 1984 CONSULTANCY HOURS 420 F

PC-I 0'h MAY 1984 (P.o. ei DP-CONSULTANCY HOURS 538 N

,[

DEPOSITION HOURS 24 f

i

) :

I

( aiel JUNE 1984 i!

• I CONSULTANCY HOURS 518.5,I DEPOSITION HOURS 4

[

(Buyst #1 i

i JULY 1984

,l

• CONSULTANCY HOURS 587

'f v

{

/

E (Comm. Cool _

rst taitial (SEE ATTACHED TIME LOGS) l!

.t-t.,

PAyE E CERTI,1 CATION. I certif y that the above bell is gust. true and Correct; that no p.stt thersof has been paid encept i inat sne balance is actually due and owing: that tanes isom which the County is esempi are emetuded and that i have res famil.ar wish the ov ions I Local Law 32 t980 as detailed in the payce anstruction secOon of this toucher.

GENERAL MANAGER I

PAYEE *S SJGNA1URE IN IN'K Title OCTOBER 10, 1984 OCEAN FLEETS SERVICES

=

g Date Name of Company COUNTY COMPTROLLER'S PRE AUOli 4

[N DEPARTMENT CERilFICATtDN HERESY CERTIFY TH AT THE M ATE RI AI.S ADOVE 6PECIFIED HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY ME Cellificate for GOOD CONDITION wtTH OUT SusSTITUTION, THE SERVICC PROPERLY PERFORMED AND Payment of HAT TME Qu ANTITIES T H E 80 E O F HAVE GEEN V E RIFIE D WiTH THE E XCE PTION S OF Dis.

Not Amount REPAhCIES NOTED. AND PAYMENT IS APPROVED.

' ~

Verilled IGNEO DATE AWdil'd

-'v"6

=.

.u-.

l

.xu1DIT 5 i

-.,'. f,; cot:cy or surrong

,.. 'l~ -

~

~

~

n g

. q, _._

u...,

' Department of Audit and Control G.

D.

ELEY p

CONSULTKr2's EXPENSE

SUMMARY

. =

3. f -..

1

.u -.

- y _~

L - ~ ' 3...........-:.

7t'[f oM ~__

?

1M OCE AN FLEE'PS SERVICES Period Beginning 8 /1/ 84 Parlod Ending 8 / 31/ 84.

Jj Authorized SIF.ature

- l 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 3

14 1.5f 18 gy 33 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 23

?/30 7/31.

l

.tenditure Itwus

.=

',I I

I amil or Das i

.s port a t.f on.

~

[

.t i

Rental or s

sgs Allowancia l

t e

64s 2 00 0-s an't Parking rees 2.00 1

er 1.imousine -.

l b.

1 o

i

\\

~

49. cL' 4/. ti 94!.6*O M. C O. 29M Y. 2 '7 1

\\

19./K,\\ /l.f3 g9i 2/ rips

~

9 3. 3 /J C/1. 9 /

(71 1 / @ J.S /

L

.ing/ dips l 69. "fi btj, <7/

5' l

l 1

6 72 i

. //2% /2 29 f.Y.2

.0i1 iphono and Telegraph

?-

W. 0 9 W./K

=

ricio or supplie,s

. =ett

~

- supporting

\\cou smpenditures abou14 t.e covered by receipted bills or invoices wherever sib 13.

Eccessary purchases of amater1&ls, supplies, equipcent or services total RzzymsLnLE ExyptSES:

8 J~. 6 21d be supporte6 by ar ::. aries showing vandor, descript. ion, mait cost '.:.,. -

.,2-

,.c.:

- u A., a ll

., L ~*

purpose..

m..,

% s.:*

.; a :.. r'.. % + :

. p. O C:,: "-:.

.~,.;-

~

n.p

^

..,. :c.

m

.. n.v a!

~

t

.c*w y

.g

.'Z.

j..

9. s". 3,~ p _g.. p; y '". ;,..~.

. -,. a.. a n.,.,,2,,.,' +. *

+ Q '; e r "

• j (*,. y,, t',h,,3.,. f.lu* >.*..hp.. p.,* jst,.

~,.;. jr-;.

<W._. "v,Q y,a..

.?

m. g'?l.

s

, a **.

, L ",

f,

s

.W

~2;.

4

.,b3

.. y.,f. J '8g%. 'm,'*, %.:*.* 3 " *'%{ ', # - %.;

l,, d - a w-

..s

- ] (.c *.

M.,

'%{

.; %s.. ~,N. g m **.r g

lh f ; ;

.c.

c.,,

. s.. y;,. F., vf,C > q ",, eJ '.p.~ ;

• 4*.' % " :. ~ gf.v.

n *, ;,, _ e

,m.,

f.

M L ~' r - s.. x_

s

".C...

3 fy l

a.f c

.f. 3,

.. ~ ?'.Y.~

fl*. [,.ll*).'.f&~} {f. '*, Q]f": "h *f.,Km ; -D ; * {.h+':,-

). w*w.

'Vlej.w'.n'

'm

.:,;.,Q ; T,.,.]

s

~..; -

v.

~

c_. 3.-., ; ~,.v. ;. :- 6... n...w. ;,u.

+-3...

. ; y:... m y..;_

\\.

g..

r-

.s

• ).'., ',, e r.t...,. [.. * -,,,, '.,,. -

j.;. '. (

C p '. _ %. t '.,". O. S...$.g..** Q.7*. s yyW

. S

,.'w ;sj.

+

3

......- 1 m......s

..3.-

. w,.

,,. -. k,'yj- ; - r

$ $[ $ ~$ [,*[jj 7' {]'

hy.N f ~; } _.*;;

-~. '

. n..

v.:

E.

e nIBIT B

~

-c

.1 -

~

CGU:C7 OF S.UPTOLE sc

.s

• Department of Audit and Control G.

D'. Eley CONGtJI.TAET'S I:IPENSE SUMMAAT y.g r.;.p..

W ~ M,....c.f 1.

u -

c.

.S "smo OCEAN FLFETS'SERVICFS Parlod BegimtingJuly_1

_ Period EndingJuly 31, 84 Authorized SIF.ature

// oc4f

'l 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 3

14 l's is maiture Items 17

-13 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31.

'i sail or Bea I-sportction, gg aantc1 or 7

8 go Allowano'e s

t I.

4 i

and Parking Fees

2

.a cr I.imousine ' ~ ' '. \\

61

=

l H.co

- l

/3.L*C

h. cts b

1 l

a l

5 '*

n. 91 35 92 1

1. . r-5 M. /t

/.2. %

fo.co 9.99i l

I '

.i M.cl M. Sc soisv to s.-rc io-c 4 5

l

\\

l phono and Telegraph 37 i

4. W

4. n 4.99

\\

N. %

1 1

rials or supplie.s l

I l

i

[.I

• At t

s. sg a

Sepporting _

g s

. :en

$,79 ndituras should k.a covered by receipted billa se invoices wheravar TOTA 1. RENI.E EnmSES:

S sx Ib 0.

Kocessary purchases of materi&ls, supplies, equipcent or services b

id be supported by ac: aries showing vendor, description, sait cost

-t.

.p

. m.

-,.=e.

s,..

.,.m, m... m, ; $. *,..

n u -.

. f *,' 6.[ J o_ ~

u

, ' (Q. };}:

}.,,'. -% f."..

VQJ..[

,,,, q l (,

e s

S ny. n<.s.u.w'. a3..,o

_, ;,. ; w a -~ : s.'.-

e w y*%. m

.g.,

s v.

.. t

- ?.

• b '-,.

~,'s avg *f.i.

-r

.. c

~

,s w

~j '-

a, 7

lx.f_.

',', =

. *, _-,. ~ r.

.r

+

g, 3.....,,., m..

• f-

.m s

1

' [.,.dd. Q J.* ? ',4 $. i I; %,..';, ; y (.N-E f,,

t c'

-4:

1..

-',.t

\\

, w m s... c.. w "*

I.p *$

.t:. a..Tf *. -'v,r* 2.

6 e;r 7

,.s.- %.-L.,,

.Q g,*.lL e%y y..+: :.

[..,#Y, E

I "%*t L %,..- - s.-r.

k '.

['.

,b'

• h N

s*'*

?

f

.g e-1>

i 'a; A. *.* w w.*

,. ~,l 3;.9.*[ ;,.,'_.-:..- {, 13..

s

..t:

,'r*

s 9.:

.i u

n a r y.

r s

c. y.r-- ;*.,,,"< j.P L, g.. f,z.,4 N. 3,, u o'

~

=..'.s

^

e '

s i

3

." ]

7 * [.

IY 7 ~4,.

~

~~

m e' :.ww.m s.n we.

, v :c. ',, n - "

g'.,,

• ' ~ ~ -

i ;"...- - + s

.w.- :=.

..-a.e

• v. ~. n %, ;,

.w ~.~. ~ v.u.v w,a,a.. =.a a. :, v. ;mm :

,.-, 4 w : s.a: w..a

- x,~.

2.>

..: ~.,

c

.e..a.,.

m., ;..

.v

..n a

~.

.~

v. ;. y

.vm-

,. ?

. 9..

• g : :.,. s.%n ye., w;. %l{';R.y.;;cn yC g.

.~:.:;.m v m, % :.

..g y,

' g.{g.1 3 ;. S g' ;.:'* p ;...'...

n r ',.

o

,y ;"',.-'; y {).D.2. M, 4.. ;... m ~f-; l x # 'A, $, -

A,,~

~.- T

• . *J 1

• y O

yp g {g g-

.._3,

,2., s.,

.'?:

, & Q & #L.; W ~ *C. V,.,?, *,s.,,.,

.f. / %.%. m,

. * %.[y'**.W '.y? :si %..$3 * ',,

r..' '.s. _

', ".,' ~L 4

W.s ;..

w

-s m., m g;s; w,. e.,.:

v

.s. ns (m.,.

w-3

.. e..

...a m

n.....

. ?. *

.% 4

....:.~

q n u.

n.,,s b...s: x

.a

. * ;4 s.,,.$s. p/ ?.4 2.#, a/;w%u,m ?,.Q. /j '.c;.k.; V.

.,. +

g aA%.,1 Cd'.'%e'. w ~.c Y ~ ~ x.'9 p*-

,. n

.e..

A < >.-

<.,s+

s';

.. ~,

. ', [ h..' ;

', 4 7,.

. 0,"

'. 8e 5 ';

e.M" J

4 N s dy*

g 'l y. 3 +. \\ '.,.-

p'-

.' c(-rw m} h ('..' *, C h., '. H "'.

L[ [~

AR.

-e

...C.j M'.

.WW g

- ;, ;

• y', * ) ? ~,. q.y. e,.L7.~:M.?% ' Q;.,) 8' '*

?.

• [., I ^ ' 7. '.' *[.

a*

1.,wr w.:

e. v g<e. :. : 7. - : ;

..w

..~

.3 - 4 n

.]$'

N

U

[ *.c2 -

/., ".

'a v.: A,.. [,

') E Q, *

- wc.9 i. e..

2 % ; g ).,Q ', ]

.'y. -..

l~f l

5 s-i i EXHIDIT.A g.g.9,m;uc., %';,;/;. 4 7. g._ g.; p h

Q ;7.f."

'.y.:f ^*'

? ^

,f;m._-.w

-j w,w

- ~

$ } jk....

u.. u, f.; M.< g';"l.: g]t. -

j.c u

3

. ;z'.L.jh. g j..,

jf.:.., j.y;y a. ~

. ], y s > b Q. - " 3

• .., ;. pm Yf NJ. k.-:r.:n ' ~,:l co;xn O? S.urt0W.. * %...&.u ;'.@ h .

3...

g.

y.G y R, u.

.m

..c..

...? w x.

i

~

. u..n

.. c...

e f. [...,

l R[ ' h,.., y.

'.i t,k-. Q.$.k....

- w

{..D,.

-(

.h* Department of Audit and Control, c.,

k. %

y m

. ;g.y - p T.$, s,ceg.y p..; g. qy:,,..7...A :

4 J....

.s

&- gyg,ge5 mENSE SU)DERE..:

.m.. y..,..,.

'* x, b...

A.s 1

- - M..r<M ~ Y-7

~..r%

P

.irz Nam &s 10 L FLEE TRontSPericd Beginning 3 e l'V,., ' f W c W W. ;

m / F i ; S ?"' i y'* " M'-

.,3., - N.c,...~

y t

v...-

.., ; - V r

s f.-..f.?1.j T. :n;>p $.. ~ 6,. D ;:--... ~. f... r: :,.; $,.

-v. c -.cf ". '.j.' :... (..

Period Ending 31.

. Authorized Sly.ature --,. [ '.,, f r

.,,n*

2:. L8:.

r 4

r

~~p

• e

,y d. g 1

2 3

4 S

6 7

3 3

10 11 12 3

14 15 i

I 15

, Expenditure ItassS..'

i p

13 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 29 10 31 -

Air, Rail or tus x!.a t

'Trangportation,. # L' ~ h 5 53. %

Auss Rental or. < N..r o I

f Milosgo Allowancia f."'J.#.

Tolls and Parking Fees i

~

\\

l

\\

Ta:ci or M=nusina) p-

"MMO l

[

-I 13.OM 8

Y I

I 1

{

l 1

l l

U l

l l

I naale/ Tips ;

't-?"

f39.06] I4.cCl n.FD

17. r.O 7

Lodging / dips ~

{

{

i l

l I

N I

j l

l' l3i.70 l%70

.G b70 1

I l

l l

l Teicphone and T.I.sraph 3.83 i.%

l l

l l

l

. I i

Matorials or Eupplie,r. '

j i

l

{

. i l

{

g

. _J

\\

l l

l l

• l

\\

Equip =ent j

l Othsr supporting

~

Snrvices i 9.CO l

l I

I

• All expendituras abould he covered by receipted bills or invoices wheravar TOW. EmW"LE EXPMSES:

.pbtsible. Kocessary purchases of matarlais, supplies, equipcent or services y

enculd be sup g.2 and purpose. porto6 by ac=:, aries showing vendor, descriptico, tanit cost 7 l "o

~

o o

J.,'

s.

M

~ ~

.e.

J

'e

.~

9

~c-_

'D-

I i

t' '

jq e

ll

]

t

j t

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

g y

4 This is to_certi~fy that copies of the foregoing were served by deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid, this

// M day of Ell, wet./

1986 to those on the service list b,elow.

d

,...s r.',

Ag e

Sus ~an-L. Hiatt i

,a SERVICE.. LIST JAMES P. GLEASON, CHRIRMAN f

~

Terry Lodge, Esa.

RTOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING BOARD' 618 N.. Michigan St*

~

513 GILHOURE DR.

.5ILUER SPRING, MD 20901 l

Suite 105

.!, Toledo, OH 43624 n

Dr. Jerry R..Kline

' Atomic Safety.& Licen. sing Board.

U.S,. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission i-

Washington,-D.C.

20555 q

Mr..(Glenn O. Bright'

.-Atomic, Safety &. Licensing Board-

.U.S. Nuclear.Regul'atoryJCommission, Washington, D.C.

20555~

.-Colleen P. Woodhead, Esq.

Office of the' Executive Legal' Director U.S.-Nuclear Regulatory' Commission Washington, D.C.-

20555

' Jay Silberg, E'sq.

I,

~

Shaw,fPittmanicPotts, &_Trowbridge

}:

1800 M' Street,ENWL j.

Washington, D.C.

200361 h

i!

Docketing &-Service l Branch i

.Offi~ce of.'the Secretary.

t

'U.S.. Nuclear. Regulatory. Commission

~

Washington, D.'C. ~ 20555' LAtomic.~ Safety?&, Licensing, Appeal.' Bo'ar' Panel

~

d iU.S.: Nuclear; Regulatory; Commission Washington, D'C.

20:55

/.

1

.i e

.t

,