ML20106D119

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Correction of Typos in Util 850201 Motion to Strike Testimony of DG Bridenbaugh & Gc Minor Re Suffolk County Emergency Diesel Generator Load Contention.Related Correspondence
ML20106D119
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 02/06/1985
From: Twana Ellis
HUNTON & WILLIAMS
To: Brenner L, Ferguson G, Morris P
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#185-509 OL, NUDOCS 8502130008
Download: ML20106D119 (2)


Text

.-

HUNTON & WILLIAvis t

2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.

P.O. Box 19230 74 g

WA5itINGTON, D.G. codDe see eaan avc=ue r

707 cast ua.w sinett P o.somvsas nicwasono. vinoemia raria asw voan. waw vonn eoi?

vcLapwoms so4.ves.oroo tattpsont ria.eao-eroo 1000 TEtta7547os TELEPHONE 203.e$55:rc6 -8 P3:34 i

Twu vio ess oose 0

e a e, so,mo..

. o so.. e rinst venotNIA maNm TowC.

e. o. som seen p*Lteen. Monte canotena areor wonrotn. VinotNIA 23$44 TELEPDeoNE seg age $370
    • '""""',**~*#*'**

ransv ven.etsste sames suitoemo yggg,,,,,

e e o som ese F e b r u a r y 6, 'l-9 8 5 o vet. v e ~... = 2,se.

do..c a.

e.ooracao g "

TELE

  • HONE ei9 e3 7 43es rAshraR. VtRotNia 22030 vcos -o c 7o2 2.

-noo 24566.3

...cc,.

  • 6 ~o. no, e..

8 4 5 3 BY HAND Lawrence Brenner, Esq.

Dr. Peter A. Morris U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4350 East-West Highway 00CKET NUMBER Q

Fourth Floor (North Tower)

Proc. t ur L pac,,,,,_ _ y Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Dr. George A.

Ferguson School of Engineering Howard Un'iversity 2300 6th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Judges:

The following two typographical errors of omission should be corrected in LILCO's Motion to Strike the Testimony of Dale G. Bridenbaugh and Gregory C. Hinor Regarding Suffolk County's Emergency Diesel Generator-Load Contention, dated r

February 1, 1985:

Page 10, footnote 3, the quote inadvertently omitted the word " error."- The quote should read as follows:

The designer shall consider an operator error as a potential single active i

failure.

Page 11, four lines from the bottom, the word "not" was o

inadvertently omitted.

The sentence should now read as follows:

8502130008 8 (DR ADOCK 05 h k m'

PDR f

s

+

..y.

I--

i

~/

/

a Hux rox 6e WILLIAns February 6, 1985 Page 2 There is no regulatory requirement that a plant must be designed to meet the single failure criterion when the limiting conditions for operation set forth in the technical specifications are not met.

p

ully,
  • zC

/ S.

Ellis, III 75/403 cc:

Service List s

8 l'

+

b 6

4