ML20106B575
| ML20106B575 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas |
| Issue date: | 09/28/1992 |
| From: | Dick G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20106B581 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9210020294 | |
| Download: ML20106B575 (8) | |
Text
_.__._____ _._._.._ _ _ _ _
i I
t UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REG 4L610RY COMMISSION i
HOUSTON LICHilNG AND POWER COMPANY j
CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD Of_ SAN ANTONIO f
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CITY Of M 1 TIN. TEXAS DOCKET N05, 50-498 AND S0-49_9
, NOTICE Of CONSIDERATION QF ISSVANCE Qf_ AMENDMENTS TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES. PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARD;
@]LG EERATION DETERMINATI.QN. AND OPPORTUNITY FOR A HEARING The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering is mance of an amendment to facility Operating License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80 issued to Houston Lighting & Power Company, et al., (the licensee) for operation of the South Texas Project, located in Matagorda County, Texas.
The original application dated August 30, 1991, was previously published in the FEDER/i E GISTER on October 16, 1991 (56 FR 51926).
That application was superseded in its entirety by application dated June 2,1992.
The oroposed amendments would chenge the technical specifications to reflect a change in the actuation logic which would accompany the replacement of the two original toxic gas monitoring channels with three state-of-the art toxic gas monitoring channels.
The actuation logic would be revised to provide a two-out-of-three (2/3) logic for a high toxic gas actuation signal and monitor failure actuation logic, as opposed to the current one-cut-of-two
-(1/2) and two-out-of-two (2/2) logic respectively.
In the June 2, 1992, L
submittal, the licensee requested approval of _ an interim technical specification in September 1992 followed by a final technical specification to l
l-
- EA nsa3S83lhi o
~.
4 1
s 2-i i
3 be effective in february 1993.
This would allow adequate time for t,ardware and procedural cFanges to support installation of the third toxic gas monitoring channel during the Unit I re'.eling outage (fall 1992) and Unit 2 refueling outage (spring 1993).
Before i.,suance of the proposed license amendments, the Commission will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1964, as amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amandment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
Under the Commission's-regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequeaces of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any_ accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has providad its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:
(1) The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The addition of a third channel of toxic gas monitoring would not i
increase the probability of a previously evaluated accident because the t'xic gas analyzers have no role in the initiation of an accident.
Consequences of a previously evaluated acciuent would not increase because a third monitor would provide additional redundancy,nd reliability to the current monitoring system.
Therefore, a more credibh
. xic gas monitoring system would be in
'P TV
-'Amr-M HPW-tN*F"-B-T r(VervwT-=""-d'e'C="--ry*' ort nw-'-S-N
-e--r'tt'f*'-1--Mw~N-4rW--Illry-vev W eur awe w y m W 'm
-yH+ hvevwe w 5
$y"7vv'**tTT
'W-w+9'e=--Twag-N-v='*erS*w'-"'*"S"**T"r4 9e&~p*wt1*'4P 4*
- 'r'"'-'"w'-
'%%"'#W F
i 1 place, and the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated I
would not be significantly increased.
(2) The proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or l
different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
The proposed change would not require the toxic gas monitoring system to perform any safety function for which it is not already designed or required i
to perform.
Adding a third analyzer to the monitoring system for each Unit would m vide additional redundancy in the detection of toxic gas release.
i l'
for these reasons, the proposed change would not create the possibility of a i
new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
(3)
The proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The decrease in probability of actuation when required for the_high toxic gas actuation signal and increase in probability of spurious actuation for the loss of power / malfunction actuation signal are slight and do not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
[
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this -
i review, it appears that the three staadards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied.
Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request j.
involves no significant hazards consideration.
t The Commission is seeking oublic comments on this proposed determination.
Any_ coanents received within thirty (30) days af ter the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination.
The Connission will not normally make a final determination unless it receives.t.
request for a hearing.
t
l 3
I :
Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Rules and Directives Review Branch, Division of freedom of Information and Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC l
20555, and should cite the publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice.
Written comments may also be delivered to Room P-223, Phillips Building, 7920 Norfolk Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. federal workdays.
Copies of written comments received may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555.
The filing of requests for baaring and petitions for leave to intervene is discussed below, t
By Novemh r 2, 1992, the licensee may file a request for a hearing with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license nd any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene.
Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's " Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CFR Part 2.
Interested persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the-Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the local public document room ' located at Wharton County Junior College, J. M. Hodges Learning Center, 911 Boling Highway, Wharton, Texas 77488.
If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, will rule on the i
.l
-1
.._._,___.-,..__-,_,.__,--,.,_,.--_m._,.,.,.,,,..
,, _ -,,, -. -,., ~. -,,,,, -,
' request and/or petition; and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, And how that-Interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding.
The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particulie reference to the following factors:
(1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible e'fect of any order which may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest.
The petition should also identify the specific aspect (s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene.
Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity l
requirements described above.
..ot later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference scheduled in the proceeding. a petitioner shall file a supplement to the t
petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter.
Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted.
in addition, the petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion l
1.
I i
t i
which support the contention ad on which the petitioner intends to rely in 1
proving the contention at the hearing.
The petitioner must also provide references to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion.
Petitioner must provide sufficient information to show that a genui.ie dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact.
Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the amendment under consideration.
The contention must be one which, if proven, would entitie the petitioner to relief.
A petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these requirements with respect to at least one l
contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
l Those permitted to intervene become parties to the procL Ming, subject to any limita' ions in the order granting leave to intervene, ar J have the I
opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses, if a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration.
The final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
If the final determination is that the amendment request involves no sis'11ficant hazards considi. ation, the Commission may issue-the amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the ry,uest for a hearing.
Any hearing held would take place after issuance of the amendment.
If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
l l
_ _. ~.,
1 f
-1 Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the expiration of the 30-day notice period. However, should circumstances change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, the_ Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of the 30-day notice l
period, provided that its final determination is that the amendment involves I
no significant hazards cor. sideration.
The final determination will consider all public and State comments veceived.
Should the Commission take this action, it will publish in the FEDERAL REGISTER a notice of issuance and provide for opportunity for a hearing after issuance.
The Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very infrequently.
A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention:
Docketing and Services Branch, i
or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555, oy the above date.
Where petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform the Ccmmission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-(800) 325-6000 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700).
The Westera Union operator should be given Datagram Identification Number N1.023 and the following message addressed to Suzanne C. Black:
j.
petitioner's name and telephone number, date petition we, mailed, plant name, and publication date ano page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice.
A copy l
of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S.
l l
l l'.
u..-.-.
=. - -. -. -.
s 8-i i
I Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and to Jack R. Newman, Esq., Newman & Holtzinger, P. C., 1615 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, attorney for the licensee.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained-absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding-officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the petition and/or request I
should be granted based upon a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(ii-(v) and 2.714(d).
1 for further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendments dated June 2,1992, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW.,
Washinaton, DC 20555 and at the local public document room located at Wharton Count; Junior College, J. M. Hodges Learning Center, 911 Boling Highway, Wharton, Texas 77488.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of September 1992.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
)41y l
Georgef. Dick, Jr., Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-2 Olvision of Reactor Projects !!!/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i
r 6
,,--,3.,-ye..
m,my,,,,..,...-
,...,..,-.w.,,,,,m o
,,,--......_s.,
...g.,-a
...m w.
,,4.-.
..m..,.
,.,,....,4 s._,-..
e,-..
4,~,-
. -.,.,.. ~,,
....w-m..
-