ML20106B297

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Disagrees W/Ge Conclusion That Reliable Software Needs No Addl Analog Backup,Per ACRS Joint Subcommittee Meeting on 920504 Re GE ABWR Control Room Design
ML20106B297
Person / Time
Site: 05200001
Issue date: 05/08/1992
From: Lipinski W
ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY
To: Alderman H
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
References
ACRS-CT-2021, NUDOCS 9210010105
Download: ML20106B297 (1)


Text

_..

C T-abal

'ARGONNE NATIONAL LAllORATORY m com3:am 9700 South Caps Avenue, Argonne lilinois 60439 FAX: 604 25249?8 BM 9dM/9A May 8,1992 C EN.,E?

.m o

Mr.11. Alderman, Staff Engineer g j 3 17)2 Advisory Comrnittee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7.cn m -

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Alderman:

Subject:

ACRS 3 lnt SubcomMrLinlktilng nnJ1E AdvanenLUniling Water Reactor 3

Control Room DeslRDJ.Jav 4.19H General Electric concluded their presentation with the statement that " Reliable Software Needs No Additional Analog Backup," I do not agree with this conclusion.

General Electric has offered a commitmeat to deliver reliable software with negligible common mode failure probability, GE does not have an eroerience base to demonstrate that this commitment has been met in prior designs. Therefore,it %uld be prudent to include a carefully selected minimum set of hardwired instrumentation and controls in the main control room during a transition phase as nuclear power plant Qsigns progress from completely hardwired to completely computerized designs. After an appropriate experience base is developed and lessons are learned, future designs may progress to completely computerized systems.

Sine rely,

'f/hL& ?

4 n +.

Walter C. Lipinski Ph.D.

Reactor Engir cring Division WCL:kj cc:

RE Files: ACRS, A15 Project Files: C

{

DEST @ATtD OHICINAf.

Codfrini I:y 9210010105 920S00 PDR ACHG j

CT-2021 PDR l ' I)

Operated by 'ihe Univerwy of Gicago for The United States Depantnent of Eacrgy

}h

'a