ML20106A399

Intervenor Exhibit I-SC-69,dtd Nov 1983,consisting of Monitor Ratings for Access Control,Activation & Response, Communications & Protective Measures.Drill Comments Encl

ML20106A399
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	06/15/1984
From:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
I-SC-69, OL-3, OL-3-I-SC-EP-69, NUDOCS 8408170248
Download: ML20106A399 (45)

Text

,

v = 50-3&a o t -3 Setee y ~.

1hs lx ":% - !;y,x I ~^'

Il 7;

'N

,t

n. i b,

n ~[I L%,LfGl' S-7

.*(

w Do=xrnnas

, ~Wneni;tAnas S C -20tc t

,(,

I(

'N ii fiOCXET NU.'4DE:t I2 0 P. E. Ui!!.. F/O.h 7N.,,,,N t

)

i NOVEMBER, 1983 x

seguAR steeLATORT 89N#tt$198 '

l JCE/' 57 w,, m40 322-o c.

,,,,,,, e u le en asHw of-8MuttritB_

mate asctITts e

Appuca a

/

asJtens latwvea,,

sears stre 47' sentraeter_

witnet.

emer ET 7

f

' Emrter I

i 8408170248 840615 PDR ADOCK 03000 G

l o

e

Monitors Rating

',, l A'rea Evaluated G.-

Access Control 1.

Was an, appropriate access control 5h3 2 1 N.O '

posture established?.

2.

Was there an-identifiable system imple -

5h3 G

2 1 N.O.

' _, ',.6[

' mented that effectively identified __

authroized personnel within the facility?,

'-e-J., ayr, K.

Sumary--

1.

Describe any problems noted by the area being evaluated.

Provide a description,of the problem,.its outcome'or effect and any recomended corrective courses of action to alleviate or

- correct the deficiency.

Any of the p'reviously listed areas that receive an evaluation grade of 2 or 1 require a written explanation on this page.

.4ci.&

pA

,4,r d # [ D A d d dW

[g

'4 b4 Y&N

~

ga-+ h1? W'4 4W p/h.)f.#

s

/

~~a -

y l y~ /-:. :& -

(f & Gb58 5

kW

1. )

./ 4 -

I g.

d.

3_g) a4,6 W,Wl W/

jUY-Q, g u% U h Y.

,_,,} Q y m + P" f)~-

t

=

MXM9M%

3,.f Hi?kk&

=%31%g{$?~ $.%Pr m.e'/rr Q4

?==gn L.E4aluat s T gnature

/ Date

\\.

ff fh Y

Gj/)f M W-

& & N?'

T L

- p m.aw g

' * " ' '"?

g ' il'1 Evaluation-b k

6h Dr

~

j Area kvaluateff Monitors Rating A.

Activation and Response

'Caf A

1.

Was the activation / initiation' h4 3 2 1 N.O.

efficient and organized? -

.. : :.fV 5

3 ~2 1

N.O.

G - *. -EE i 2.

Were personnel familiar with their -

~

"as responsibilities and respond in a

_ timely manner?

3. - Was the person in charge clearly 5 4 3 2 1 N.O.

identifiable?

4.

Was the transfer of responsibilities 5_ 4 3 2 1 H.O. k accomplished effectively and efficiently?-

O 8..

Comunications 2Q,jN.O.1hlt no p g

1.

Here all required and specified 5 4 3 o

comunications circuits operable?

I 2.

Were personnel familiar with comuni-5 3 2 1. N.O.

cations available and the intended use of each?

3.

Here there sufficient personnel 5

3 2 1 N.O.

to conduct comunications tasks?

4 4.

Was incoming infonnation effectively 5

3 2 1 N.O.

and efficiently distributed to appro-U l

priate personnel?

A)0% TM b ID 5.

Were periodic updates made by the 5' 4 3 2 N.O.

senior individual?

h 6.

Were accurate comunication logs kept?

5 4 2 1 N.O.

'7 Were the status boards properly 5 4 3 2 1 N.O.

L 1

i 1 Aw

• Y utilized and updated?

-

• imn oM 8.

Did individuals in charge spend an inor-6 14 3 2 1 N.O.

dinate amount of time on comunications, such that their attention was diverted from the incident?

(No = 5, Yes = 1)

Q

Area Evaluated Monitors Rating G.

Access Controi 1.

11as an appropriate access control 5-4 h 2 1 N.O.

' posture established?

2

1. N.O.

h 2.

1!as there an identifiable system imple-5h3

~

.., y";-4-i mented that effectively identified...

authroized personnel within the facility?.

.-f~

~

H.

Sumary 1.

Describe any problems noted by the area being evaluated.

Provide a description of the problem, its outcome or effect and any recommended corrective courses of action to alleviate or correct the deficiency.

Any of the previously listed areas that receive an evaluation grade of 2 or 1 require a written explanation.on this page.

D.

A4. w,mJ.h.)r/ H.oCc,o/4f d &

y A J > S W da q H "4 " 4 )

nishc,L x s JL w.p MW g/uk.Jh 4 A 7/ 67=-). Jan ~d &-

L JL g/. Mu.' 4.M M, f

M/#"

4

a..Ay / 4 W P"# A "' # &,

a.

1 p/.

4 M M/

4 pr. p p d e;f'du & " k= $ Mw.

aw"m+

w#*'NM6%/--:

3 L6 N4 b ngt 4 5W M.g /-Ap6 l

i C

M5-I s 5i95Eture / Date Vj^j/ HLAi~-9<-AA+ y war uaf5Me.ty.r~~A'sd L of m.t+~

a o r n 4 -r n & h ~ _' c ~ y m y * L't.*'.2* %,, p sMprm. map + -a. g a s,a

.w.

f*

I Arca Evaluated Monitors Rating _

G.

_ Access Control 1.

Was an appropriate access control 5 4 3 -2 1

N. 0,

\\/

h posture established?

2.

L'as there an identifiable system imple-5 4 3 2 1 N.O.

g;., $

t.-

tented that effectively identified auth'roized personnel within the facility?.

'. gf 5 %.,

H.

Sumary 1.

Describe any problems noted by the area being evaluated.

Provide a description.of the problem,. its outcome or effect and any recomended corrective courses of action to alleviate or correct the deficiency.

Any of the previously listed areas that receive an evaluation grade of 2 or 1 require a written 4

explanation on this page.

I s

c

\\oO 60uw Commdb I C6Mn v

i h

DDh D

n J

fn LY A,

/

C

!O CL Vll4 Q u/ WC de m~

= n 4.ldi/F M @[.[$,%'M. n.nb

_;p v;%c.,:.N;%:+et_.GAg

'HiTMiWF.hi.nMOcr/ // /7 Eniustors Signature / Dage.

~

Page 94 of 109

~

i i

~

9 4

i JANUARY 24, 1984 hu

y.; --

- - ~ ~ : --- =,:.. = =..._. :

-=

\\_.

1.

}

Evc1cetion Stendards

."5"-

E::collent - Personnel and equip 23rit always functioned without

..i.

crror. There tere no problems encountered and all personnel and

.cquip= ant functioned at a superior level.

I "4"

Good - Personnel cnd equipment ganerally performed as expected.

Any errors or problems trare minor and did not detract from cc:pletion of the task.

.,.;4 "3'

Satisfactory - Personnel and equipment perfohred at an acceptable level. Errors noted were not severe and completion of the task "tras cchieved within acceptable limits.

"2" Poor - Personnel and equipment generally performed below expec-tations. There were deficiencies of a significant nature. The creas ability to carry out its function was diminished.

"1" Failure - Personnel and equipment consistently failed to perform as required. Acceptable completion of the task was not achieved.

N.O.

I.'ot Observed

(--

UCS 1

mgoso%gnon swlstFm ce v

g Ene-hp i

h 4 C ass b [c Ococc) Cis [3 k

&abn O w-- 0L r Ce (yg

\\n o

i n

Ch)) It J (n9CCUldl L

0( Wil S

s e,g.

nt 4 r,r'at

,l" 3

N r.!

i i

1 f-

/.rca Evclueted l'anitors Rating t'

2 h N.O. ' IJo c,NSr,* fa 2.

Did personnel check to ensure that all y(j 5 4 3

- equip = ant was available and functional e., ygpg p,g

,,(-

l --

carly in the activation process?

l f

3.

If equipr.3nt was inoperable or failed 5 4'3[2)1 N.O.

in use, were appropriate actions taken V

i to resolve the deficiency?

(spares /

j backup equipment)

.E t 51 I

4.

Were there any situations in which the h4 3 2 1 N.O.

lack of equipment, or a lack of ability -

to operate the equipment, prevented per-sonnel from completing their tasks?

(No = 5, Yes = 1) If so, please indicate details.

2 h N.0* - PA 5.

Were there any situations in which 5 4 3 additional equipment or materials, or dffTfn.

different types of equipment could have made the activity more effective?

(No = 5 Yes = 1)

If so, please indi-cate details.

2 h N.O.

o 6.

Could the area support the personnel 5 4 3 cssigned to it?

2hN.O.

7. ~ Were there sufficient resource materials 5 4 3 readily available to support the conduct 5

of the response? (maps, reference docu-

{

cents, copies of plans and procedures, l i, data sheets, etc.)

i L.)

F.

Protective Measures l y-2hN.O.

5 4 3 1.

Were appropriate protective measures

>f ~

implemented for response personnel?

2hN.O.

-[

2.

Did personnel properly wear protective 5 4 3 clothing andgsimetryJ 4h2 1: N.O. SKlfN4f 3.

Were appropriate radiological practices 5

[

09ehce P E1 sets 4.

l' observed?

i 4.- Were field personnel kept apprised of h4 32 1 N.O.

lf radiological conditions?

l,*

2hN.O.

f, 5.

Were response activities conducted with 5 4 3 regard for personnel safet/, consistent with the need to complete the activity?

'I

- :-.KY * : -.. T.' 27.'T 7_.x, 'L*:' ' *

• DRILL COMMENTS Riverhead Staging Area l

Cu__anications:

1.

Staging Area radio does not have call letters on set.

,1

'-[,}

2.

Riverhead is dispatching raod crews with Channel 3 radios

.but can only monitor Channel 10.

- 3.

No written mechanism to determine status of traffic control points dispatched vs. manned.

4.

Com:mmications links were not fully utilized; a lot 'of EOC.

co==unications were by radio instead of phone.

Problem - in Riverhead the radio and dedicated line are next to each other.

5.

Problem with EOC overriding the traffic guides on radio.

' 6.

Some traffic guides faint in receiving radio transmissions

~ inadvertently cut off other guides in the process of transmitting.

Eus Drivers:

1.

Triumph Bus Company could not be found.

2.

Standardize instructions for recording times military vs.

regular.

3.

Bus Driver Dispatcher briefing (2 minutes) asked for. volunteers to drive routes.

Briefing did not address current plant status / radiological status.

4.

Problem - not all drivers had vehicles.

5.

_ Feedback on maps - the spirals were too small, the maps are coming apart.

6.

Map W/ Edwards Avenue - Riverhead Warehouse Transfer Point -

Scale on. map is-not consistent.

Deceiving in one case an inch is a couple of blocks in another its much longer (3 miles).

7.

Route 3P Reves & Doctor Path is a flood area and may be

, impassable.

Was iced on day of drill 1/28/84.

Transfer Point Coordinator:

1.

(Mercy H.S.) Transfer buses were not dispatched to Selden.

a.

No maps to relocation center.

m -

w

^-

.2_

-b.

Procedure OPIP 3.6.4 in plastie-does not explicitly instruct coordinator to dispatch transfer buses.

~

~/

- clear up step lib

- add new step after step'12 1

.: 9

. I"'I

- Miscellaneous:

.~%j

~

~

-1.

EOC request for dispersing KI, no KI in kits, no forms for II.

2.

Status Board updating not assigned to an individual.

3.

Route caps not in kits for Dl, D2.

~4 Names of personnel being' broad' cast over the radio - may be potential problem - should be added to participant instructions.

5.

Co=ments on afternoon coffee, lukewarm - (left over from morning).

6.

Co= ment from Riverhead Staging Area Coordinator would be-

' beneficial if a checklist was available - was not-aware of new checklist in manual.

Would like to be able to keep canual' rather than have.to turn in.

l7.

Traffic Guide " unidentified by name" did not have a license

~

'(suspended license) - a meter reader.

i e

o$

l e

-.,-g a

,.-,,w,-

-n,

.,,.,.a

.w,,

n-

,._----,.,-,,-,...,,,.sw

.eu-,

.-.m,

,v,,,,

e.,,

w--

..e,e er

=.

-m.___._.,_

[,-

e Area Evaluated Monitors Rating 1

6.

f.ccess Control I

1.

Was an appropriate access control

@4 3 2 1 N.O.

i posture establi,shed?

I f

2.

Ecs there an identifiable syste:n imple-5 4 3 2 1 N.O.

-i

i mnted that effectively identified uthroized per:onnel within the' facility?

J.@

- ~, Q,,

~

H.

Suman

\\

1.

Describe any problems noted by the area being evaluated.

Provide a description of the problem, its outcome or effect and any recomended corrective courses of action to alleviate or correct the deficiency. Any of the previously listed areas that receive an evaluation grade of 2 or 1 require a written explanation on this page.

6 5, Q aue s Ccwe.&, cuyu-~, a A kw a yt~d d2aw m. % c am

• pc@ud v.-<24.

&.tuA4 %

a c4 b R n A P A E

.s. o. 4 6Mthaw b<pl su4 red Mutts 4tcA B-vmj A=

~

P

@.waa

.dttAnd ttio af sbg Aru.

E I-Sw Kate. %p auuug

& pcka.p..Le n.a hs k &.

Gewua s % A 1 w M n u t L a Q -to p d M t.

I i:

f.

'?$'?lTfli?*b

//ln/g

-Q

{

~

erirs2ttiPnTgiritD~re / 'Date A

l 1

+-

e

.,...,-,.,.r,.

..,,_-.._.y,,_.._I,.,,_,_,,,,,,

• ^

0e-*,

O e

e e

R 9, Yd

. B /s.

7$w w a.o wd.

- - :- l*

DAynm&Dp.

so.

C 1.

AL M A Def/_n a n -

AQ aAd A

pk.

y

& - 9 (M.

ad gna yn++.

f e

i D.t.

7k S Q h & Js &

w.4>

m I

1. y A

S'~/~/ & **

my~, /-a ry e s, Ad Ng w -

g 4 M ff.

4

-siw4~

i pDJn

.z&.f a

2 c.

n/ uA

./

& JZg 4

fxA.

I l

l w-e,.-,.-

.,,-,,,,-em

..,.,_,y-_,,,,,---,,,,,w__,-y,,,,

,,,y.-_

,,r--,-y,

,,,_.,,.,,,..,,,_.,y

A e

s

- i o

2 FEBRUARY 8, 1984 A9 O

4

- + - - =

y w+--e

-g

_.w m,-

,m, yy

a..]

J Cwnb ng k@u J Hf s/A f{pS+~.

A w

Om p

n

s /d%

• f W )%f l~y J;h~p e /r. ~,m - nc

, up' f

clt 2 -- hd

,-wdx.

J n

it.

U k

, JA* tu, c)m j c

Q

/.A.

I

- %~ g&

k je,yh.

y c.) %

N. A l4 0 4---

3 b ' t a d.a tN f

h'J.Lejd fy'd t~~

W&

L./)

s_ bei_;j-tw/ v k/.

W W' L

%.4 n

i. /.T n4 %

/w h

c. X.

2.

lA.) & /C.L

-b S4.

i v.).J A p M't 3.

t h - w

, L ~.-,

eJA

,b cz~ L MA.

hL>d Sm %d. - %:

fall

)L w c

7

/s T44

> 2 L~

b ~s r c.c_n wi N %$

/.

n%

s.&

N Ak N

-f lw% -a s a wm G m m.e L

/,jl tJh. 7 Y

M 2 Ys)

{/dd.4 n'

kw kJ Tudd<. f~. &

e Va nL yh v2 kg

~&J 2

/aryp A ww %

7 9e t. - M' 4

hy

/~u m

1. sui

/~~

x-u Ads ~j'. f U jL~

c

Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.

Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in 2

perspective.

Explain the deficiencies, and also note the M

exceptionally good perfonnance.

~35

-Q O

\\ Pbi1 G,

ITL-

~'

uc wormsm~as %

moag pQ 4 bne?d ~k-%cqo6s, Nt k Ceo<d m4 ass,s%e 6 l 7..

s+-

9 Qmx syfC + 1 }_f ge.

g-A CJD CL Ob oeso[g g e

c b

b bk O) lM k k

ces s b

i G

k l

1 1,

w

Sumary

]_

In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. ~ Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in d

perspective.

Explain the deficiencies,.and also note the exceptionally good performance.

J_ s e y g% gat %

~

M. pM ny

3. x Lk,H 3

g. J y-4.J- *Eua--pf fw2. k p 4 saa.nL & -

g e

M M

+

m 6

0 -

1 Sunrnary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.

Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in 5

gierspective.

Explain the deficiencies, and also note the

- 'l exceptionally good perfonnance.

-q h Yf""~

'~

a f ~ e io m u $ a w" " ] Y r

eara A

a u "-

x

<'*W '

i h}c.

had's cd2 4 & bt gfg

~"ra47W W any ry

?

-w uycw w w

a 9p _

esaey n

ns a x y aa 35W

@ g A y?f out du' r W sa*a'

&&d 4t ' w W k g c4rau' A f 4-l MLi

~

% u u

u sc%a* getFM h duaa, W M k

u e p u a '.,

l LJ cows brL 4MWg i M; Tgj;? Q/

h4 46 M,

M' tjw#w y s4wt *

~~

l Te inual c&uln, n & 10 a~d O 0M l

r-fcara.s dse & buGZ 7b & #- YWA W

Aw w

% ~

e + ~ /4 w n < N n lL Wh Lad-

~

Sumary

\\

\\

In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities.

capabili.tfes and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section..Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no* questions in perspective.

Explain the deficiencies, and also note the exceptionally good perfomance.

6 f

@ f< e m& +

+ b y M r a c.~ ;.e. ~rn 3rasao as,e,u.

u uT 4.'L1sa..L +6 o %

.S 2,

^

i.s O' ?

^

qu# F g

F Y c{,% c} cloYI M f.x &

i[ n.k %,O,w f T

~

N h f.:.eid, b g J.

G d ~ w v.o-p % a b

.,g p.4 ~4 l -ra.c o t&l1 2 alf.

c s+ie bwre s 6p-% ~ p#

ifo....

y u~ ~ f4-A- @

@.A A

6'gf4 y wp'. % 4 k A~g m A A5dL L & mL Jr m ea + s+

- cgo

.h,

WW4%

H c%d A *P W. cu g4 ra ps.

Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this.

section.

Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective.

Explain the deficiencies, and also note the exceptional 1y good performance.

I*

(TM8 A 9C64 x.coi>>$ rw. sae4r ira C os4se, or d u.- rEEr. K er4FG c

h*: @'TC GJ CLL. %A Fsp.cr TsetC I

ND 4W FL D vts L4 Popn cir*M

\\

~r duHMC M'T OC 3

• 4*

TIHFFs usk ycrem7 we+c e

,,;g g a,-

2..

l. 6Ano r(2 + F** L Gas o E WM v&Au/M oi; C~. E H E a6 C e c Y A H*

t' EVE R WecMCs r9.t r-i t e e as urr,

KT epic 4aci s

% pg cg g-rw Ep C f.4V rs evu.

s.o c8cEre oE.o 17 7-E 5'M c

E E L E4TE ocw *A

+F I

/

" O -

1. 1 R AHb ct1 t*ct.- o r t,.

s !=

F t>

e6zywa Ec (2 E U EAL Et>

LTI4 9

M ep w e5a y Aas I a.a.MTs'u 9.Ey9.o n0t.

rnC 454 c~c c-wrr m c.Eir rar Fwr oA accGrr -rere A

O ' JY6Eh A

wnTH oce;qiec pas e rrMovE G9sTfth-f THeve

• '* k E cCgy n,gucn.

na

yc p,iw

swe, m e.r. e g

""6 5 rwo ist.

S i

4-mger,4~

v4r,a mer parci emtc. er ruc

• F < ca eEw w Hu E effkr,1c.

ta A b or-10 m r ao / ' Gia r,c' Jorusriw A.

R4 s Tica DCVCW u)EaC sc IcHua

. j9f THE 4 rA FF DA %

0

• amr au c.c.

l O si Olte A Tc-HEd 0 9t C Co M T.

m 0%p c Ac.L Hb CVC'es? ~

~

4EHE424c A(. Eizar o R E,i,w ear o isparcs.ac.

w4r 4 4.

r twr-ce Pe ins

@cus c, re raesc_

ge p.my, usg.c siOs,v.

-G-

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE

~

OBSERVER CONTROLLER LOG SEEET Ntma:

Date:

Location:

ok o

A TIME OBSERVATION / COMMENT SN(

(

1 O '-

1 c % Y/I4ne6 y b

%E Sed LGMO Sihf We 2 2 ', i s F

g r

g ;e ccq g i am q

g 1LB O m( e r/

21,

<s l

C N

V p$

6 uiz w % %[9 0

I-(

0 6bMoll/RM*V-l

\\f W

Y

n 1

r^

mx TIS

'5....i 7

QfIT?T.

mJd[. <

- i :.

s.

c.

nsq'nuxpm.Q.'Th, s.

%v;,:QAJK:. c +43.e-W. X E

fMrnd y

% Q :5.'

CO*

m a e'ns

,J';:, D... :

-'A

• e:..:

x. -?S W.

\\

. e:

3-..

.. ;u. v. T'u.__AJ t/cGoe n.:

~

J_..c4:t'7 ;:-

A.t Cec-fsfat,ghyg /fryu-EQd

ds

. dpp ggggg

-rngu-p:ps C C C:y. -

7 5. a...:. w;,m.. y.q :r, m.:.

T-

. g.Sq g,y.

gg

.s+ v.vn. :-

.-a.

,~.. -

x

;;'.~ <hb., C ?.Q3f ;&.I.*~tW%'.?;

*.Eg( t.-2P 25Pl;C.4 M.Y L

i f gg..h'$

~

i.. 4.,...

-?..Q. M(f:w.95Q.${d.Oj.,A.J.;.:.Q.64Ces as.pcouy;ngg,y y3 g-

4. ::C5.nrig S ;.~J.:99 f

~ 3. ~Sg.._;,;;_

.: -.a; -

....:7 :f u. c :. y,'.

g Mho ' AlWA CM@ cac w l r.:.v la y, 33 :. :p -

. j. p.y z_t;,,,yggg 3 -~.-

...m.

a.k..usu p,.s h v r,3sg.,

1 ~ ;; '.. -9 c. J.,,;'. 9:.. 6.

L__..w, j lI 6 M '...d u.dd eW pm:hg ;M7,r :;gu.:ro27]

..-f%tc rt&T.:ks:r[Gsu=ct.;EE'S, t.r... mar PW

,ernR.m -

- '*' t-T.

L 9...g y' VJEOgd.4XD

.........g1 a]..".7i.KDESK.'AGNIfh:

S. @ TAdsCC)<.. TWf 2AMt OJA:tTe CEft6-Fiot.r s Pt. fan.7.SCKE:9AtEfu;&. R:em c::m.c.A%w.ao.

?_. _.

(

..o.atdw5

,p,pc..Q*' SEmat.,g: wv,F. Asp i:,9 x, 7 r,

-: w. mc: w y.g.g g m m.

. rf'.c9.f Riss M&Jc; tt.5ED. -TO -G.Rr.JrTcA.. -

f,Wta;.T!.6Ca,P&A r-W~g!n#.- % "p.pp;,73 h'g.jgg.p g pg 7g gw l

' - ',.*- d.,.h 6-:

CtOEF::6 pgE UCRKuM-ff:TrP ' ",

DRWEAb k TR.N7+lc.- GU iC 5 OMr*i jJ # IN P/DCfDpES..

Jd8D AfflTP ' 7WJQu".Ncdct.,rs. emv.TwcT::cdEEF'iicrJ rH:

50 m no

4. widA s c

Gem.e.

..c 5' S ' * "j SN$-lf.C 1t:Sg CE.SpfC

.fgt0;; @fE,,,HEQS OE:g.g..S==ies.fAQ:,:4

=

J vy~

a'l

-r

...Pt20.c (_L. 0 -( W O G _' - W*

washm r-- o,f o,

}4

~ - l_

sw.

m<.L N.'b.c,ma Q:t..a:> 4 L.,

1

] "J@'~hi. '

~ ' "g fQ.'g/gM a

' s. uws-

~..

gn u gy.

3 - w ;_

-- - yy pag adili:6c.g-Me ck.So <. dtyna-6 folai:JW Cew:k@hg.r",se[qs,yt -$4f2(%,:c4!:;3.' p,. @ei

'iF%dn O ; C<eJ-Q-N_ $.' M 'y @i.

'-. lu'di --c.

. rae n

.rui

- M.74 '.;-.;5:.s" *b -J%.'.M,.YY.Q...f.*3

k..%W "y" k c T u bf;e0 &

W.f @ 5-

'*i p.g.y

. g.a.

f#;,'Wh -W,W:y.y.~ - x ;.MW/>Mi@i;'h4 g,_... #.... d. s q'

.j

.<c

-g-

-.p- :

.., = +..

N '#-F W -'

. e...

sp~' :U. ::,. : -- :.% - Q.,..

.::.a ~~ ;ff.:. ;..

Vroom e.ncam

' &.]

' ?S-

~ : Les.&un:.,,e.cht,,,J.

[ 54' h(V

.](

hN-DY&!

c) mQa3 -

m.;-.w.,'..w.

^m n...

fb.,e=. saw &%%kt/m&'hxR 4;;h%'D-On.!,.,.cuor a.&j .; uRV.*?..w -fc (:C).a Qp_o,'p..- ',}e % dMA;;,tdce;. @r(.s.oE ms,fong,,n a ,m, Q cf :p% :M r tr:' : me-n.,Im,,y. p, ,.,, s %=. .e. ~ $S.' f}ff C.Op c,

a. w

w. m m er %.v :.v.v;...a i

e. .': 1 - - .. Ir ..:. : n _ ;.-

e...- o.. -;y't..i.:r_./.l..,..,,, e.,,. y'._ p k..q&_(A([..

- 4 r _Y_- . 4 ~de, iA d:~...c i

-P...

'.- m.' D. ..,... ;.y:: J[ - A 2 y.. -;i,...-; ; -;..a p..~ >Qg,,q.G;.?.L q ~ - ._S, t ,a n. ~~ n u,,.;. c Q :.r ~c-.,.n,;u,,, ..ac. - s gr: w - Q &p_ g,hY. - fs=.'., W.4.$ Q' *. !;'

l-

}M..':p

' _ (,.: . s.5'.y..*J'L*S ~v~&* *

• g,.l.:,-

'r 9 - Q. ~ Lg-b;: y

• 6- {:.; y Q;;U'M.

p' r;: ~ " ' <rnewM m dr.s. eed R ::=.-i ,,r e., S ," M N ye y }"5_.P' A s e 4 __ , g.,- 6>,,_4mfffg _ y. r g._

f.: 5k!

$b~

h. h

[k? {~$ w ~w W p cok.e w g.a g eo p ea m w e a p ; g aww Y-Mp:.a~s.wp-g m m q \\ 5 *-+9s.p.&=2:.pva t ;.W;.k p.s.,;., s...r-c; ;._c. :w.ed..~A;.r, e..,.:.~"~c=, n .:.- r ~ ,.yav. _ m.. s. N%. -M-o ?.: ;. ~ ?. :m l N ). .isaWJPM W T nae % % m p% w L n G u % wc%.. A M MMMd M

~'s e' i Yes No N/A N/0 i

12. :Name the organizations represented I

at the EOC. I '( Q J i 1 -3. Did the staff (first shift) in general display adequate training '[' and knowledge? \\( t-14.3 Was a round-the-clock staffing capability demonstrated? \\( I: 15. If'so check which method was used: [ shift change presentation of'a roster double staffing 16.' If a shift change was demonstrated: - were incoming staff briefed? )( 7 - did second-shift staff diaplay adequ-te training and knowledge? j.

17. Was someone dispatched to the EOF?

)( 18. If so, at what time? 19. Briefly de' scribe this person's emergency duties. 1 O 4 e E -?_ y

III. Command and Control .Yes No N/A N/0 1. Was.it apparent-that a senior / individual in charge at all times? V 2. Were general-briefings given to the Staging Area staff periodically re- / garding the_ status of 'the emergency? V 3. Were _ personnel ~ going into the field - properly briefed as to: - Protective action recommendations? v - Potential plume path and radia- - f tion levels?. / J - Their particular assignment? v/ l' i-i l-i f

III.- Command and Control Yes No N/A' N/0 1.

Was it apparent that a senior L' / individual in charge at all times? ~ 2., Were general briefings given-to the Staging-Area staff periodically re- /' garding the status of the emergency? t 3. Were personnel going into the field properly briefed as to: - Protective action recommendations? v/ - Potential plume path and radia-tion levels? / - Their particular assignment? r s O 4 9 1 _

- III.. Comand and Control.g Yes No N/A N/0 1. Was it apparent that a senior y ~ individual in charge at all times? A f 2. Were general briefings given to the ' Staging Area staff periodically re-- -f g garding.the status of the emergency? A 3.. Were personnel going into the field properly briefed as to: - Protective action recommendations? N - Potential plume path and radia-tion levels? I - Their particular assignment? e e 7 e D 9 -, - -._ _ _ _.. _

- III. Comand and Control e Yes No N/A N/0 1. Was it apparent that a senior V ~ y individual in charge at all times? 2. Were general briefings given.to the Staging Area staff periodically re-- '[ ~garding the status of the emergency? 3L Were personnel _ going into the field s properly briefed as to: - Protective action recomendations? / - Potential plume path and radia-Y tion levels? ~ - Their particular assignment? v b 6 0 h l l c l l t e e e e C h O e l l 5-

Sumary In your own we'rds, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and. resources, or lack thereof. covered by this section. ~ Put the facts. recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective. Explain the deficiencies, and also note the exceptionally good perfomance. O P o O O 9 O d. 8 8- - --- -- - l

A 2 +\\' _ N +- i y .' h III. Comand and Centrol J Yes No N/A N/0 .2

1. :'Was it apparent that a senior #1 individual in charge at all times?

/. M .g ,y 2. Were general briefings given to the Staging Area staff periodically re- 'garding the status of the emergency? ~ 3. Were personnel. going into the field properly briefed as to. n j - Protective action recommer.dations? t/ - Potential. plume path and radia-tion levels? ' i/, 1 - Their particular; assignment? r/ ') ~% N i) j-N .a Y s e s Y j v' _) .4 l f 4 + l ,? t. f e s_ q: h c j -o j. (., y /' 11. l q' i = O a k [ d l g 4 \\ m i. 5-1 m .r.,_,,--, wr- . - -., - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ - - -. ~, ~ ~ ' - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - ~, - *, ~ ' - * ~ ~ ~ ' ' - * * * * " * ' ' ' ' * ' ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ " " ' * * ' " ' " * ':.

b I Ic, Comhand'and Control- + Yes No N/A N/0 s 1. Was it apparent that a senior V .5 4 ',' individual in charge at all times? n ] 2. Were general briefings given to the Staging Area staff periodically re-1 garding the status of the emergency? ,v 3 3. Were personnel going into the field-a properly briefed as to: s - Protective action recommendations? - Potential plume path and radia-sf tion levels? f A - Their particular assignment? y t' Nj ;/ i'~ i ) i .L-L 6 6tkumred v s M Ir iT bt 4. Coskeo/0 I 3. Fo U/O rw b esei t ) e l 5-(..

Sumary A ? In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, . ~ capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this Jsection. - Put the facts recorded in' the "yes/no" questions in -~ perspective. Explain the deficiencies,.and also note the exceptionally good performance.. e' M M u 4 =:f= & M % m u,,, xe e :g - * %e p34 .cidWA4 & i NM &, J. g N e - 9 66 M t i m h l 4 -

F F -1 3 i / .3 c E FEBRUARY 15, 1984 m O k

w -- - - - - LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS' EXERCISE OBSERVER CONTROLLER LOG SHEET 4 ~ Nama: Date: Location: TIME OBSERVATION / COMMENT Su6% IN r Ttf--7t-e A ed ~ i A sc4 N A L h w1 L2 A w f-ngkul ~ f k L a s 6- -.u4w MAN g.1 3=+ l ,ik.4ha M I N g,_di. g J J 6 A /W..'t.) M 9 w 4 J <. s,. 9, . ail >% h L - L,& y r% sac r >J was )- p 4e klot44. d a ^+-- g.g 4 9 M Jf %W h-f 4 L k o t. p v A Lt., L M ' 4 = t .J. ~ g W g v~. n - I .F k%c.H 4 i M L. l {% 6,% J b,\\b. / s.u a.luJ /T \\ l au b to

.s. 3 MM MM

~ i tL.L. fu sp, W J k*-< M g fe. l b ).d~, sh hyp n.tk ~ Alogs J u Lh ~ ao 4A % b dl y k *~- &bA,.. W k N "

• i u e b tot W

fT f- *- q ). >. m n 4th b > % %.

s -A Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.- Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective. Explain the-deficiencies, and also note the 4 ~~~ exceptionally good performance. }j , uk/ 9-# 6.346 $E. p A.OI Iw A %M .r-i -W @ g p,L-mt m CA -4) w W W% A,W u>M 'a A te~4% w qs3 7L.43ref, cm, s nz u a..x qw - p =- =o. J Gb-V- L~, e w I i 9 i es e I i l l. 1 l i-6- l

~ Surnary In your own v:ords, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capcbilities and. resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in d' perspective. Explain the deficiencies, and also note the J ~ - - exceptionally good performance. ='y ssu p ,a, p.y .g - s. . /./ $ M,a s. s s e u uw~ m "8Iw *' Ze ~ g9 9 g ny74f.; eg int y ~s a 9 g' % u en sea n cy p p~w. J,s q s 6 d*'G~ M y cr f ' "/e e.~ se t,) Xf+ ~2, ~+g M.1g A.m X wk-t-Adopd ] A my _Ledyd 'k sna% a clig 1%X w SW L uf

k. AffNu<

,a m - m en + ~ sn ; ~4..;p W 5gj.u) 4 9 $ %, ~ ~,, h y p a g h a ~ m,o c : = = f 9 l) g; c y. o,. i,a~xs ,,.m aa m g ~ w a A, 4,,; u,. n{g/g

1. s y 6 M.A-9 d b y*

~ OP'EP A" "4">A v2 + cAuA$5 f N d'& sh, iw w ' s% ~fp+s - m p wr -a py

a s t. J m 4e II4 gg ; 7 .. 7-~,-------~7-~. ;...... 7 g a.. .m %x.,.. m..g.,. 5 ,.3:,.. c... :.,+.<;.

u. m

~=, W A, p ..?.. :. S.e. 3 } C W % ),."., &. o,.c .u.:. \\ .s

+.

x ?; e.Syi.5:,w,......%. % s. .. Q.... sfR.. W,..:~.%.,.,.._'.ml..,@WhT3'. a ....p.,..,tw ;._ . +- ,=.w:.Y. :.N.,.. 4.W, :. .. g a c.c x :n. w. . m M. ~ s m .m . n. s +...... c~.,:.,.w 2. :.'.... w.,.... - ...:.. r n. ....c..u.,. . ~.. e...

x.. ::::n. ; -;.

-.m .x.. .- M. n $ b...:.. s. n . a= w*-.-~,. -y p. y,.. e s i.L N. . ~r '.,; q, .;.,....W..- . a '. !... -

• o * )-

- ; n..,... :. ,~;,,,. s.. * *+,,.u, s; o ..,.s. v.. ~ ..t v.o > n.. . a: s

• ~~..*;.}.,...e. wl t s '..

,..'.*sJa.,,. 4 ...-a--...;j.=%.

j... +

s-. ,2 e. ..-p... a, . ;, y a., , li. e - 4 l4.'. 2

• 6

-*h ~ ...h. '.'; y.. 4h,, = 'V.,r.G "~. -* <, r. 1 R..., e. " :. M. o*.. M:.h n

t

~'u v4.. : .,$*~.'.n q.g. *

4 ** *,'s #.'e.%.'.?,....M..'

i - :...f. *

• 4

.s.s,J',; v., s. l-,.**..,,,.L..y,;,,.,f....a....' rf. _ n...-; - A,1,. *, a. ], ,.,...y-e .,r. i b 9 t l

• 1*.

a. ' ~ * ", a ,s."'.*. } (..g 6.* L O ~ - . I [ ,,e.. ..s ) I w u ~ m. f f% ( rk tw.. '.,--..*..3.. 1.1 .) h ...--k C(.g O../ . + ', lE, y Q......' Q... L 1 H ...s. >e c ..*-s.- s ~ .v.e.w - g I X C.f (,. l .~ ..* %.ae. s. ,s

• ?.

s a.t - *:. e ,t......-: q. t 4 3-., p..'.g.- s,r.s ..n

e.. n.......

. ~. z.. .gr.,. a g

s..

, s.e. v, v. e. .sb .m.... 2 ~ ~-- 1 ~ <~;- g ..:.Q**' s.....o

• r.. g.:; * : %.. Q.., *:.:'. _,.....,.,,. g. >h..

.. +. _ i ,..s.,.?..

a,

...w.. ; - es

j. p

r..

s s .a.+, j . ~. l , ww::.4:&.i.-v,~;-n.,. c ;@. ::SW .!~... 1

- L ~2.> -

~ ~- - - ' '~ s a......w.m. .+.y ..m c..c.m. v.:s : c.. n.- .t. .:.ie. %. - =.5,.:p i %. e s ..:e.

- m.- ;6-.

i .: +... ,s I e _n..... v .f-- L ' ' *g' T. ' * 'm.~s. 9 e......*.. 4 /- m .

• w a :.,

..p" nW4 p( '.i'- .* p,,: ^**. d =, ;'a y ? :..y ;:.* l r e, .. - f*=.C m..:

, M h;~.~.'

2.!.t.*r~.'. W U Wf... @ %. 2: -x s ' -- * ? ':. l s ,4 ~~I; ~'.*'S*, {lR&." $*,. * *...;t ].

• . *f. ),

'[* .h ? CI' /

• .i

-. ".i.'....,-... t *

• ',.<..:.4-6

c. s, %..

... f.:n l %.-...s..,J. s .r, . a w.

e,..

s.

s

.? .....? ; na.% Q...:*.. J;*,',.,(;-., W e **..l

• .. *. :l * *

= ? .! W e ,s..- nyj-....*< '- * ' .;e. .-/ - -.

• 7-

'J '.,.'. N $ .,,..e s .ss, 4 e e, c....,.., 3,.., V.. 4 ?..* + ys..* ,,o".;.,, 4.6.-

r...

o s- ,. 3' ,.,i r ~ r y?. a. ..A g*. ..l,. 4 .. L .w. s ...s......y . r. - *. *.

• 91..u. y.

s.. +.... &. ;... (

• c....;,:' :..ss.:. ~. - <.:.

,o -;. w ,a. a c.,. ,2. , ~ m,. 7 s r.

.,.. ~.; p ~,y,,

.y....s. -p.. Q".... ....., -,u .. s,p.

s. c

= z.,, ~ g ..p r a... M;yG&., %.w.g. v' -w.D+. :.. ... c.. n...e%.... t .n.;: %.. W. . s ~. r:. - ..;; :s, +- ; ':j,,? & u ~ .y. s. My;...J..;.,. -Q%..i.m... .a,...e. y %.C.. y N.. '. ~.." *eA d, .y.:..]f' ..,n. . N* ' p.y -w .. c v.. .s -.. ". t,. 5 p.,,..s.,... p:;. ' &. . e., m.."...~. w >..

a.......

, ? n :s..*.,a... -

• ..s.

.., ;a..t... 9 a.:..u. w. s..:3 ~.-: .s p..

• ..=.

,, W . ;. :.,,-:.. zm . < :,r ; *,.,. ~... ., '...,, ;r.,.,..g:2 ; -v.. y, g-..:.Q,... n . +.,..m.c .,.s, m n ,*v, .~.L. %...c g\\.. :, c. '.' s., 3.w..g., l n.. *).m. + d-..=.+e-=a-.......-'

~ a *c. m.

'....R=.v.-.e.

• ...v.

.s .s ... p..o. .,.a 4. a.w i ./,. b ~ e.. [+ ~ * ~l.'/.s ~' k*~ i.E h [ 4.V.I, *g;.(' G:P. '* iM T A*,. .,w.:l".+ b n.O. U ' b -M.=*2'Q;,*.u*.*i dp.'.d....'.sp:f... ~s.*. ', :. T.. n<- .~ ~s,. '

• .g: ;e y v.

n;. :, i. (....... .:'."*...f.W.

' c.g

r* < ; ~..'.:.~

~*.~.a -ce... W..:e.,.. v. .%..* C-". * '. N.*..i. 9 -.t. M.. :. 4" .*.w, 3 '%:,,..,.* n,. r !. r.. 7 ....,.;.....p,.+w... . W.t t r ?*" ~ ~ i >: s. ... g s,.-

• 6 *,. r

. ;; } c,,*...,, y, .e 4 n.u sv.;s.,*.t.f.n.,..- g.3.: 6'g... g.ea J m.., .,e. f'., .? *.. * * ,me maa s-c . :. ns.eJ.f p W.n h..

• e d. t **.

r,.4 b# =J J. *ar s4. < r.. ' W. 4., a

LONG ISLAND. LIGHTING COMPANY and b LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVER CONTROLLER LOG SHEET mg ~' Name:. .Date: Location: TIME OBSERVATION / COMMENT b % wd IL > w s.sh t) m f.; w n k -. n L % tt%Votk .> t ~ b ~. % B Wd* L 4,9 A14 .( p 4 + u d t w M R. m uL %A tr)r gg 44 b W L&L91 pu %,, % ) t -h.\\u W y.-e b a. ~5 Q N A - AM p+ a k. A 1 k<. l i 4 L A W.. e, 9We), ab.pf.) Q n: w. bbA-,4 4 p f m, v uj I, LL k m 2, .t, buf _k, A. w 3. As p o.i.w,3 AM % b ALpJ wLb i fe- ~ E" LWe, p J L L !:+4--. i w, - ~r lC. 3 NO

=="'-"" W u u s MLwl. at ~; b, g. A. A a M J % : m, .,,s. % u. k ue1,, w h e h. L fx n 4

2. d b h a k. / b V-+.L- & u b i L--

l h. t Al u w AJ ML kh bb ~% %L.p.1,*L 6 =1L% uw L Fmg s-h.), q L Q h J oM-d..T.

- 3 Str=ncry capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, cove Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in , ;j section. perspective. Explain the defici exceptionally good perfonnance. encies, and also note the ..j wt~$= n 8 b' I $1 b (d WOu] M tt,, howd o % Asfor phs C D o r d r ecrN ev s. lu c c btb#c) 110 oh rudihn coc h 40us m he arns i h @[r O ( M, e a:! i .C e O ) e ,4 O O 6- ~ t m

III. Cochend and Control. .Yes No N/A-N/0 ~g; -1. Was it apparent that a senior t/ 43 individual in charge at all times? i' .- q 2. Were general briefings given te the Staging Area staff periodically re-garding the status of the. emergency? M 3. Were personnel going into the field properly briefed ~as to: - Protective action recomendations? - Potential plume path and radia-T; tion levels? i - Their particular assignment? .,/ i -f '2 ~. - t h i 1 n + -b i -s-l

..u 1 III. Cor:s:nd and Control Yes No N/A N/0- .i 1.. t!as-f t apparent that a senior individual-in charge at all times? [.- 'l Q ' 2. !!ere. general briefings given to the Staging Area staff periodically re - garding-the. status of the.-emergency? 3.. Were personnel going into the field I - properly briefed as to: - - Protective action recommendations? I - Potential plume path and radia-tion levels? / 4 - Their 'particular assignment? _y i I l g-l .\\ [ _ b l j l i j-s l !\\ 1 I i -s-I l I

= III. Coniund and Centrol Yes No N/A N/0 2 '1. has it apparent that ~a senior 7 individual in charge at all-times? Y % k'

2. 4fere general briefings given to the Staging Area staff periodically re -

j garding the status of the emergency?' V 3 '. Were personnel going into the field properly briefed as.to: - Protective action recommendations? / - Potential plume path and radia- / - tion levels? f t/ -43 - Their particular assignment? ,/ h ,d l 1 l 9 I 9 I e 5-y.-----.

4 .a III. Conmand'and Centrol Yes No N/A N/0 l. Was it apparent that a senior f N individuab in charge at all times? v %[ x 2. Here general briefings given to the Staging Area staff periodically re- - garding the status of the emergency? j~

3. - Were personnel going into. the field properly briefed as to:

- Protective action recommendations? / - Potential plume path and radia-f tion levels? V - Their particular assignment? ./ 1 g. A e 1 v< e t g ei 4 I ~, 6 - e =-%-. ,.m. .,m._,, .m,, ,,._m,,n,_,,,, _,,,,,m_-,--

Y III. Con: hand and Control ~ l Yes No N/A N/0 .s

1. -Was it apparent that a senior 1

individual in charge at all times? >Q d 2. 1.'6rd general briefings given to the l Staging Area staff periodically re-garding the status of the emergency? 3. Were personnel going into the field properly briefed as to: de - Protective action recommendations? #o N - Potential plume path and radia- ? - Their particular assignment? 8 f4) tion levels? s. /* i ) 1 9 M i t (< O e e f 5-

T 4 ~~ IV. Dosimetry and Exposure Control Yes No N/A. N/0 - w? 1. Was dosimetry issued to all per-sonnel dispatched into the EPZ? 8 M 2. Were dosimetry records properly -completed? J* 3. Were personnel exposures periodically checked? JC 4. Were personnel exposures tracked? 5. Were personnel dispatched into the i EPZ given thyroid blocking agents? F 6. Were they instructed in its use? P .2: l ~ .C-l e l i l l I d 9 8 4 t m

.a Sun: nary . In your own words, describe and evaluate' the demonstrated activities,. capabilities and resources or lack thereof, covered by this section.,Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in .i perspective. Explain the deficiencies, and also note the qJ exceptionally good perfomance. .g g \\

• E M.

Toot. Q ue c h. /w> ' EFes e nEei cuagag es secg4thar ~2.. 'T 4 6 M "' WISE' N. T*-HCrvC E0 & C F84' #

• I" b O'i#

E C 64 Y E~* N $beJeraAs M4 w Co. JomC r T*4 t*** De* V6 *~ (T4 ruf PEwowtLC Tl4E Go 4., 4y g g,g4 4 9,,c 7 pg.s(,3g,g op p,,,j,, fyg%, 7. g, + + o i, ~., or kweJr <f 9 Y OAFQ(C, gy ps, ,6an-NW $ sp (,5 O N'Y fPourag'* i.) ly y ~ WE'GerE TT47us. ' 4 f GED 6ND WiCC ALAvs Y teh W4r gu gg, s,'m h $l L) g( o A*MIb 3 c., Foc 4 e ' s ,ra exaCc rC a < T4TC e uc.;- sm esu.en enrr cerets es + we,es esake;,s -C m 8 4 l t t O 4 ~6-s _ _ _. _, _ _. _ _ - -. _ _ _ _,. - - _ _., _, _., _, ~ _ ~ ~, - -.

Sunmary In your oren v:ords, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities. capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective. Explain the deficiencies, and also note the exceptionally good performance. "o l. % w y c -_. - _teR,. (X- &,, K. yp, _. o ~ di % b d etc. L, w W = A x\\( =% o-eL L k t = y= A u An-e -- M A- -Y .i O g.. i e e 10 - ,,-,.-we.,-m,.e.+.....m.m._, ...---m,.,,w}}