ML20106A391
| ML20106A391 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/15/1984 |
| From: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| References | |
| I-SC-72, OL-3, OL-3-I-SC-EP-72, NUDOCS 8408170238 | |
| Download: ML20106A391 (23) | |
Text
G f
L*
u Q
-So %,
/,,
i
.)-
, c(Q <
J
/ I]r'-
I\\ \\.,-
i(
or -vrT r:UMMR h
w e. cm. v:A i
NOVEMBER, 1983 sumsse saevurest semensees ee,s,, n 50-322-ot. m,, SCEp72.
SAch ham ~ Eh cAinc4 /*/ennnf se me unstu et step castmgn A; 8==8 ggggggga
/
Intervener maJggren seet's stra
[ 4f
$satratter marr seamter 8408170238 840615 PDR ADOCK 05000322
~
G PDR
- _... -. _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _... - _. _ _ _ -. - - - _. -. -, ~,. _ _. _.. _ _. _.. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _, _.... _
Area Evaluated Monitors Rating 2.
Did personnel check to easure that all equipment was available and functional 5 4 3 2 1 N.O.
early in the activation process? g y, 3.
If equi in use,pment was inoperable or failed 5 4 3 2 N. O.
were appropriate actions taken
,[
to resolve the deficiency? (spares /
, :. y{
backup couipment)
,- h..
'. '.. '"J ~ e-
~
Were there any situations in which the P
-1.,
4.
lack of equipment, or a lack of ability
[Vi4 3 2 1 N.O.
5 to operate the equipment, prevented per-sonnel from completing their tasks?
(No = 5. Yes = 1) details.
If.~so, please indicate 5.
Here there.any situations in which additional: equipment or materials, or M %,3 5 4 2 1 1N.O.
different types of equipment could
/
have made the activity more effective?
N C44(
blM 1
D (No = 5. Yes = 1) cate details.
If so, please indi-SkQ mg OQ 6.
Could the area support the personnel f.e assigned to.it?
'/ge,,L 5 4 3 2 N.O.
e
- 7. Were there-siifficient resource materials j
readily available to support the conduct 4 3 2 1 N.0.
of the response?
(maps, reference docu-y ments, copies of p)lans and procedures,'
data sheets, etc.
by gg EJ F
Protective Measures
.I 7:
1.
Here appropriate protective measures Ar id:plemented>for response perso'nnel?
5 4 3 2 N.0.
n, C
Did personnel properly wear p% ::b 2.
t.
rotective 5,4 3 2 1 N.O.
clothing and dosimetry?
4
\\
3.
Were appropriate radiological practices observed?,'
5 4 3 2 i N.0.
w
['
4.
Were field personnel kept apprised of redtologica?' conditions?
5 4 3 2 1 N. O.
,. 5.
Here response activities conducted with i D.O.;
~
regard for personnel safety, consistent 54 3 2 1 N
uith the need to complete the activity?
~
f s
Page 93 of 109
(-
i i
~
1 JANUARY 24, 1984 O
+
u--
r-
-y v--e--
-.v.,-
.q-c g,-
-,,m
5 4'
[.'
Area Evaluated Monitors Rating b
ri G.
Access Control 1.
Was an appropriate access control h4 3 2 1 N.O.
g
. posture established?
f 4h2 1
N.O.
.I 2.
Was there an identifiable system imple-5
>d.
mented that effectively identified
.i authroized personnel within the facility?
.I Sgg sp37 co u_nguy R&Lo w
~ ~., g. t 41 a
H.
Sumaq
~
1.'
Describe any problems noted by the area being evaluated.
Provide a description of the problem, its outcome or effect and any reco=nended corrective courses of action to alleviate or correct the deficiency. Any of the previously listed areas that receive an evaluation grade of 2 or 1 require a written explanation on this page.
A -3)
MMl%!;r ro 7' s pensoa in e s,eg a s e
,p 7,.,a; r a p p,e -
x
?
O*U k/4f
//)Govy/p/4&G oNLY
/F yo U MA7
'rM& "'7'A4 A=tc CcwT, cot. Cooapwa vez
t llEA *S UA 7'#2 SEc7~/ o*V.-
of couAse if you i
L*
- k AT YME SitiN - a) ssogap yog'
?
s youzn j
~7N2d AcNofsJ
- YMtf, fj?e5g.G-s.tg y e ~7 gQ
/S Y
~7M&
T M M
S0**' *"
l{
f.
fdepe2 ofto4 O/fF&As"7 M Y'
- E a
/MPLGME.y7/*'4 /pocEOdAGi.
l 2,
4 A. cM.
e p-(2A Ota$
/4y f */ 2 4 / S A l * *
- E l-comped 7EUEff(6xger
}
},
/AIJTAvC7/odf
- 4. A c sc J.ocA7saNf af 7'A As/c TA?u edef )
- 4. /w4stury ro fe eLow sc e"seia ove ro fp.0cSpuRAt Co v 2/ LAC 6
( moy AALG ro i
course r Neucosrea ),
i
%t2 % d-2 **? m m
/
I i
,.!ese.w.w y w v ;.A w g. / /s3e -84 w.-.
u -
M cor4MGv7 ro d-2
.NNdatoYsNgiiaNr,e / Date ff0PLG co V L P)
Br&
l DEN Y//*/GQ AY NAME Y"N$
OA A-AM
/SA///M
/J u T 16Cuntry Cout9 H.ev& MGM SG7rdk *
/r
/J J 7/ce, fe1116et (JA Hf AJ A/o v *)
T*
GNYde
-rMau res teeggwosy g eog coag ( riscu rue
- * 'M E T~o#4CG Y4tt9 nuo Go rara rgig foc u"en ceucco m reea)r. is ao sumo sr rm earmes.
]
~
- ~~~7.'-
3
.m
= - -
-=
s
.J i
o Arca Evaluated Monitors P.ating i
i l
2.
Did personnel check to ensure that all 5 4 3'2 1 N. 0 '
equip = ant ucs available_and functional
./:-
- . ectly in the activation process?
%*)
3.
If. equipment was inoperable or failed 5
3 2 1 N.0.
-f1 Ql4
. i:
in use, were cppropriate action's taken
- - ' g-to resolve the deficiency? (spares /
'.t
,'/
backup equipment)
- 5';
l 4.
Were there any situations in which the 5 4 3 2 'l N.O.
lack of equipment, or a lack of ability r
to operate the' equipment, prevented per-sonnel from completing their tasks?
1 (Ro = 5, Yes = 1) ' If so, please indicate details.
5.
Were there any situations in which 5 4 3 2 N
additional equipment or materials, or hijg ( Q
.O..
different types of equipment could have made the activity more effective?
g"' CLCgUd bull cahc., &
^
+
(No = 5. Yes = 1) If so, please indi-CR a n o 9
cate details.
6.
Could the crea support the personnel 4 3 2 1 N.O.
assigned to it?
yg 7.
Were there sufficient resource materials 5 4 3 2 1 N.O.
i readily available to support the conduct of the response? (maps, reference docu-ments, copies of plans and procedures, data sheets, etc.)
F.
Protective Measures 1.
Were appropriate protective measures 5 4'3 2 1 N.O.
implemented for response personnel?
i 2.
Did personnel properly wear protective j 5 4 3 2 1 N.O.
clothing and dostmetry?
3.
Were appropriate radiological practices 5 4 3 2 [N.O.
observed?
- i 4.
Were field personnel kept apprised of 5 4 3. 2 1
.0.
i!
radiological conditions?
4 7
i-5.
Were response activities conducted with 5 4 3 2 1 N.0.
regard for personnel safety, consistent I
with the need to cocplete the activity?
~
~~
I
,5 i,
. _. _ -,. - - - - - - _,. ~....,.. - - -. _. -. - -.
1
}
Evcluation Standards I
' 5" Excellent - Personnel and equipment always functioned without i
trror. There were no problems encountered and all personnel and
-j
.,cquiptent functioned at a superior level.
I "4"
hod - Personnel and equipment generally performed as expected.
,1,
Any errors or problems were minor and did not detract from 4,
co:pletion of the task.
,,,,._- Q t
w.
"3" Satisfactory - Personnel and equipment perfo*med at an acceptable T
l-level. Errors noted were not severe and completion of the task
~
"was achieved within acceptai,ie limits.
i "2"
Poor - Personnel and equipment generally performed below expec-tations. There were deficiencies of a significant nature. The areas ability to carry out its function was diminished.
"1" Failure - Personnel and equipr.: ant consistently failed to perform as required.
Acceptable completion of the task was not achieved.
N.0.
I?ot Observed
( --
CS m %h-s w/stvd 1
cstynkr 8cte-f,p l
C dx5 tf h
ed I
-C h
NQMn O w-SEL r Ce (og
\\n o
l i
i Sf0J)!4 M QCUlfEl L
b f R-h S
i
\\
A r
J 1
e, Q.
11LA4 %X 4
l
.)
f
-n l
1
)
}
f
- "*T**'*,3._
. 1
..E.
1*...
,_m_.
DRILL COMMENTS Riverhead Staging Area Co==unications:
1.
Staging Area radio does not have call letters on set.
2.
Riverhead is dispatching raod crews with Channel 3 radios
~ '
~'
but can only monitor Channel 10.
3.
No written mechanism to determine status of traffic control
^
points dispatched vs. manned.
- 4.. Communications links were not fully utilized; a lot of EOC co-2nications were by radio instead of phone.
Problem - in-Riverhead the radio and dedicated line are next to each other.
5.
Problem with-EOC overriding the traffic guides on radio.
6.
Some traffic-guides faint in receiving radio transmissions inadvertently cut off other guides in the process of transmitting.
Bus Drivers:
1.
Triu=ph Bus Company could not be found.
- .2.-
Standardize instructions for record.ing times military vs.
regular.
3.
Bus Driver Dispatcher briefing (2 minutes) asked for volunteers to drive routes.
Briefing did not address current planc status / radiological status.
4.
Problem - not all drivers had vehic'es.
l
~
5.
Feedback on maps - the' spirals.were too small, the maps are coming apart.
6.
Map W/ Edwards Avenue - Riverhead Warehouse Transfer Point -
Scale on map is not consistent.
Dect.?cring in one case an inch is a couple -of blocks in another its much longer (3 miles).
7.-
Route 3P Reves & Doctor Path is a flood area and may be c
, impassable.
Was iced on day of drill 1/28/84.
Transfer Point Coordinator:
j 1.
(Mercy H.S.) Transfer buses were not dispatched to Selden.
a.
No maps to relocation center.
e e '
,,.,,_.,,-_-,.----,.-.:-,-----es=.or-e a
v =
- --*+e"n' "8m*
'*'--""'******"'-'r'""'N'-"'-""N
~' '" ~'
- ~
4, t
, g.,
sj Area Evaluated lionitors Rating
.i G.
f.ccess Control 8 -
1.
Wes an cppropriate access control 5 4@2 1
N.O.
i' posture established 7 2
2.
Was there cn identifiable system imple-h4 3 2 1 N.O.
- _ d canted that effectively identified
.m;. -i,
,j authroized personnel within the facility?.
H.
iuanary 1.
Describe any problems noted by the area being evaluated.
Provide a description of the problem, its outcome or effect and cny reco::rnended corrective courses of action to alleviate or correct the deficiency. Any of the previously listed areas that recefve an evaluation grade of 2 or 1 require a written explanatiers on this page.
8116) ~Pr.
%- ~- W L &
or wam m.
- l th 4,~ ua ata ay *r=~t pc 3 l
w,tl + win & n.
i h"
Y p. e 4 a/ 4. 6 - -s
- 5 f**/* ^1S**N~ ~
j
&n ) %)^b ""' A ~
") * -
c 4
f
-a,... %
7
. A t.y_f-y g.,C.'.L:r.ee.
c.i;eit:R.59. a.
t-
/ fgp m.
a.
. g. '. d ' '
s
- t' J-
- 9. nature / Date
- g,
cmm q
a
,V*
- 6 e
e e
d e
t
.' /
FEBRUARY 8, 1984
Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective.
Explain the deficiencies, and also note the exceptionally good perfortLance.
Q hv f, LUC 2-M i
'gg[a.&<ca.,.em.,us-w.gga,,g? #
"'~~d 4 M w
'^
x6> 4 -j. 4 g v e.9pue, L Au & 4 N W h$ A WM y.
i s6b b6 aa6uJ2, q A gap i. c.me ecw..
e ~k 9 -x p v n p, +
h) cat m.
~ @ uk w " & - g 7 A w w
,ew m
4 wc0 -en*
_4
O Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. 'Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective.
Explain the deficiencies, and also note the exceptionally good performance.
RIVES.nce us+iin k4f (E9Ee4% R>cMr Fod.
H o+- :: Ewd 0 AvP cacit er V64.i aE(LY us h,L..
dA 6CA
- W H 'T E ' 8 " E D W43 9 20 DO bot cocr orEn.
r MiE 4
orggt 37Arug ge4co LJAT c P P T E D, H w i t) E n A
6G+ W n+Ecc rno no OE s
pe;t, FlHE EeJTRY.
INi:cJ M r/o,s fro,-,
E;,c.
cd4f 590'?A0s& f GAT 2-PL4rJT cro n.sr
+~ RC'G4rE JTATVI
-c.
WE"E^
SE M a,.,7 - ~, ce,
,a wrc,
,me -cer, THE Ge-Mcate mac eeoso;.;c.
rhp.nT,;,a. sTMF "E
=~
a:7 c> % piecc.r-; w ' re 'o g w,,,
Tia soa o r%
,4,, w e CF C' REM :ovan;ns f.
Rooms a g;>.c gnEquAcG.' A PA 6'fsiE+1
([ ^ P E F M iaC-EAcM %&
L.s
- Tot Lead".ac.G gra J TA M V AtM.
Ttas cF FivE TR49Ii-ER Por vr coca.o ihAt op.
th C(
(J EF O
- I M A*"h ts C ito M t % TsirJ L-oG-O s S ?.4 7en sk lyo va O Y-f TE9 V'Ef%L YEtt a9 2.6~
H1s 976 D G G.A4 I& O tSfWA
- Y '
- ""=
es: m ar ec+. s.-mee fre, bc. am.
rus.r r"*'
- 7 fEWT doc-trcEri$,a O
eg.
MA,s)- d ; cf u Hcs tf P4 rcH Ep,
im r w. ?
e 4 Ec RsTT
<UA r Apiqa4gq tJsTrt yterdisq<.
CFFCc7 e
op s4alLML-
'M F8 (I Fi, a ct. ScrisEif 6FGi s,
T QA Fhs-Go t n E.
wqr chetEsErr La iTL4. Dsts E rER - TH RCus tr -
R' C'T R os H ro ArsarHGA INO si oJ4L yya gyg,sqJ/IA TH[rs 60 T.
l f
1 DE~a b htG t>
~
ugy TP res,Nc.. IMPE. f.,
v Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities.
capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. - Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective.
Explain the deficiencies, and also note the
-~
J j
a o w a s h )~~
exceptionally good performance.
7he h
W'
[
4A.4A-s a w
sa
~n
%44 a f d & ;L
'ik i
p+y~ g n e
L bgstwe e & f g A, 4 -
Duk I,
b CddA.b
/
WM sT f 57, y u & p i %
mae W.
~
pp ( exm.
~
l l
7
. g
E-Y.
Communications Yes No N/A N/0 1.
For each of the following:
- a. -Indicate whether comunication Yes Gas demonstrated (Yes, No, etc.)
- b. Name the communication system used
. on the dotted line (dedicated land line, two-way radio, commercial
~
phone,etc.)
- Local EOC/ primary G?t%$4dph
/ backup d
- Bus Drivers........... N........
- Traffic Guides % ttes..
s/
V
- Road Crews..rm..%..........
j
- Route Alert Drivers oM.M..
./
- Route Spotters.........W.....
/
- Transfer Points................
J-2.
Were radio comunications easily j
understood, i.e., no static?
J 3.
Was there too much communication
/
~
~
traffic on the radio frequency?
V
- 4. -In general, were communciations
/
good?
/
5.
Were messages written down?
6.
Were they retained for future reference?
7.
Were any communications problems
' /
rectified?
V i
i t
e l l 1
..____,,_,,,_;.i
-O Sumary
-In your own words, describe an'd evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this,
. section.
Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective.
Explain the deficiencies, and 'also note the exceptionally good perfomance.
1 ruc t146 Jc.e54 coe noimro s-o A o EMo Tac 0 <r6Bvr se,a of M '" *f 0
~ ~
IEMC 4e t sirr$ r s i,y.
cAosas 99.*i rMC
- c..,
rk e wtr pour a
e r*
P R C c c.c e E.
Ar'V WC (-o rt Foa.
RAbs, c. uter gagostgesa caea,.g Pc E vs.uf cotsi t.J.
rat R.4 m cprsI Ar'o 67E
- MCW r*4~
UEnteccc thrTEni o E75 G'VEd wm Mscnsr+AnytL pad.c. HurC-615+c.u s4
'86w d' otr+Ngo. Igpu aJikc. row 4 0F DENorer724 rep, ruoce</or4Ca oc ruoccer N4# YWr-9o 45thecir pac ceve4 <-
M Ec 4 4 m arer 6nrte RS cars [aek-w,m pg, a y,4e g,,,
p,,
'"IE 4'Ea pa uz.g (g.e 7 re,. A s
r p mvca.
v4r (E Pmect go;,,
ev7 Ar a r.wrE reertCP 06[94 4 GeFl rec TALK w%J HCAAo sp. TM C T Q.4FFec Otoc R 4,e.
- ts THu.r
{'4fa.9CE.dAarssr I
cwo sGoJr sea k rsuus ras', tr o s nu
' re.re. rre,,.
r Ap eggwy c p.
?*
.A 2 Ao cec a
- Cat E.a.
ruPEev&e
,p cM i++ u ' D u FsE<< rt-8%i.
Cco4mese
- s' e m n*-r-users.k). kr ter re klo 'r occ coc, r.
g tracsc ak r
o ucrt -- TH<r o.k94 7til P'65r Ev o &Ct sta r.
c *k ist* Aya 4sao Di %rEO NaHG Mr Msr Af E L TCra rsaht,.Y REL.n CD o n,s
% Wet rue orese twcc we+c uce, m ge.
l A
Tp4r+JFEs bsh cooAosston W 4 sc f e strirecte A4 00iET hs'-*
hot H6*e.
P4pu.
ruv sna C4csh GC FO<tose,
ar 51.<L W Vot,.a n(
i NO OPG'e t &
ca gypo w, i
9 9 i
9 w
i !
t FEBRUARY 15, 1984
=
8
-= j L-Comunications i
Yes No N/A N/0 1.
For each of thelfollowing:
h
- a. Indicate whether comunication d
was demonstrated (Yes,. No, etc.)
- b. Name the communication system-used on the dotted line (dedicated land line, two-way radio, commercial phone,etc.)
- Local EOC/ primary.b*...
/
/backE
.. te,, /
3
- Bus Drivers.'M. E.d.
r
~,
-M
- Traffic Guides..N5d:430....
J
- Road Crews......
r:
- Route Alert Drivers s
- Route Spotters....
s f
- Transfer Points...
t/
2.
Were radio comunications easily understood, i.e., no static?
3.
Was there too much comunication
/
traffic on the radio frequency?
/\\
l
~
4.
In general, were comunciations good?
5._
Were messages written down?
0 6.
Were they retained for future reference?
\\
I 7.
Were any comunications problems rectified?
L nc A
oe de 404 S sogJ g 6-M WSSr<fS...._..
g
.a Sumary In your oven words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective.
Explain the deficiencies, and also note the 7A exceptionally good performance.
3a e
}_
2.
t-. K.
- Tw o T 9.
P T-Ca c R.o.
b f
W *Ch$
D h%h $f ylg U
$" TWW f$#4 Wh 7-
- e...-
m aem.r p
Q&
Q
&l g*
%<arTT* -
' PATS ov W wo 4crv4u T w r, r W F-
"$r ( fo hs W1 T.o Sic., g C< 6 ft4A T Jn.
R4P* *J W 'TF1 Y4/1V c. IT CLk toJ w s~ r eur ro m annu 4Ae 4 6<<s c.++cercF.co
'o *. ~<-s ce Ae FMTP TW yr.(M!. 754 E.r4 6
t afasis se wCr r o ut.
e
~~
- l TQ4t'a.
t** I u
- I Q 1***M4Toor ThPFte Org g4, WI'.
71-1fa osy 05.6r w g,,
s V H 6e' OAGuA AVoA
'c.gu.Es 9 a.c.tc14Aa re p2 TDAP P C-
~
6 er reo p4g F8 a r - u C : ccc ra 44 E4F (24 g,,
H
" c O
i a
i r
(
l
~
l l i I
d
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANT and
.h LOCAL. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNE'SS EXERCISE l
l OBSERVER CONTROLLER LOG SHEET y
i Nama:
Date:
Location:
j TIME OBSERVATION / COMMENT
[0 erW (2 > w p b 4
t)q fy b h {L i t L ~ N c. W
)-
.ii~.t% % nhAl t
g,9 49 g,at td tw kv~4
'.:4.
h 1 4$
\\t.,.
m uL-b& Ir)s-q
%.g L&LMA p.ta A vv )
o Je 4
4-No L t.
l-i hl-M \\ p s,.-.
a L e M be.-
h. Ag\\tk.)q W.4).) I,
10 b.
v u1 Ak 64
~
&b,4-., L,. L gg ).'
i
~
w,
.t,,
1:u-f k
A.
A h psub
-J.n. v6 @ /@
w w k.
frE [ s t.,t,1.+.,3 n y./
~
A4
% % A Lpa w L w -i f
\\._
6~,
-.. a
\\..
3 r
L
~.
-s w~
n, r T,,.b A
M gI d
Ac h %
i k W h a. $ /-~A Lwl l
zw,; %.,9 F.J VJ %:~.
sJ-fa 1p 4
% es. k un b n yu he h.
~
- 2. s h b h a k / b % Q e d __
cL d&.t.. Aluw e4%d QL RLt % )h Yki
%L. p.1.
L. b-e i L i
uu D
ham x gg,%Q J eV-d.T-
~
~LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and I(
~*
LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE. ORGANIZATION NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVER CONTROLLER LOG SHEET Name:
2 Date:
Location:
M2PC-
- d72tbd TIME-OBSERVATION / COMMENT M wh Lu qO L%
p
~ by U.
j[j p_n.)~ @c-wAan jf/3 W.4 -> M i
t(zr dw1 $p Gf */N t
V 5.
J p,,9._h P+F-nd ~ b- /~=> J -
fam p p t y _,
6 a s)n JJ s n
=
cru n-
. =.
Dh
.+
9, w 4 ~J ~ L ~
i U
/[ b s
i fa zl 9.,
~
(
lT c/ %
a
\\
/A 7? 9.,
uf~7 A W M~d
^'
i,j d L L d m 5 n W 09 A a.
nAs
~;
iar u., w i
a kus -
L
n
..,.o 4
~ ' '
Surcnary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and_ resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the "yes/no" questions in perspective. Explain the deficiencies, and also note the 7
exceptionally good performance.
m, 2,
b U
h Ass Ac asMuasuG a
% u.vdiex.rtu heeA
- Q%C 5
$ Ca4M P3s
==
e e
9
=
4 1
o O
)
1 4
i I
1.
\\
,,,g,._,
, _ _i
.e y.i.v e.u
.a. %...:._
- ._.,,.,.yy..,
.y _
y~Lt 3*. -.*.
- .iew._e.o A
g. ;,
....._._.,;...,q
= *.
ge;, &. -:..:-.......
a....s
,,1
.,..,.....I.,.g..
~
.., %.u S. 5.,
1
.g
.r*.,
pT1
(.D
-r
~.. x.
..g
.,........;g.
' ws av.m.c.':.
~.s.
. p......gr. p..s '.
. ~
t
..s.-
.. ; ~.. :.. s.4
.,..,,. 3.,
+
w",...,.,,,,,,,,
3:;;.)e..
- ~e, h.
MS.f. ~.
.>a
~,.
it 9.
. #' g,; c n :
c...
.d. @......
,. S., sprnevr V.p
.t,- -
- r
. f.;,
h[eM[e&.s5.'p W9 y-4
- 4
..,J.d.-
Y_. ' dldep*.l.5: *p !.*. Q.i *.-@.,'.%,,.I -.'.N i[.d.'. 4.W
.7J k'
.7
', l
'i-
'.7. -h.#.j.'r$.M/. Tr,:
_.m;., ~ p.,...: :.
_., 7
.. ;z..g.
l
-v..:.. <s.,. <
w*
n.
.y;.,..;.,/..: 9.,... g> y :,;.., e.c:W. <.t.,._..g,.
p.g3
.q.
,2.f.m_w y
5.;. r;.
q.._,.
=.
. ;, g.,
+._........
L_. - a I w,,,,-
~
N,
~..
z.
- ...::a n
..c
..a...-..
..g.,,--.
s
... j t;
r
- ". l
....c.==.]
.%/:.
-...4..%....
.... x.
w,
.n.
~,.. s.,.... a 1.,. s:.s,.
g --......
p
. w. r e.-
e s.
...g
.l..
g
..?
3 19 s B..
a.
.I
.. c.[
.. k.?
/
,. ar'...
- 3. q
..lyL:
..% ; w... w 7.
q,*.,.e*.... w.,s...g,% g.. f
...y
- i.,
.r...
,.v.s..-'...
?:.h.'
,s
(
....9....,.,
r,.,'..s. -
f.. ;.
- L.,.,.
- '.g..(Or.., C,. y p.. '. g. ~ :: * *:.',,*.;. M_ :.*E:n: >'
L g
- y. -
.... v._
p:,.
._ n ;, -..(.:;;9.g.;
. ;.3
.s.
.'....:,..-_.w,.:
.. ~ ;....~..: ~. : x <..
- x..
..a.
=-
n..w.y ~,. ~: L..
.n. s.s..,...-
c
.. :d.e.g
.a, -.:
-',.q W.
..: ~ ?
".z.
d.
...f >.v_-.
1.
[
..it r
.l
.........h.
( '..
g
, g.
l r
]
'..s-
. - -... * * * :t.
I' l
r.
.d -4
{
- e..f. o. b
.'N,..
-r..:c,..,, y.......5 :
- j ' 4.** -
= Q.d. '
.. - >1. n c: ~
'..._" ~.
n
?
(
b.
'.."_S' '-
.. (_...
.s r.
. > k.. ;....
y l
- %..[.'.;
I I
J. is 3. -
.e 6't 'cf.. : ; 1 2.
...._.4
.? *\\
i.
.. '. t :.j~
l 7,..
.. :. :.,. 3..
.:..~.....
,.c y.
_b.,.@ M.M&..Mb._..._
j L
R e d. (g-fo p g.? p Q Q QQ _.
w f *,
..,-. 0.... t...v..
n - n y., 2,. m.... e. s..
.,: : --u
.-- v-6
~
i
.:..,.; v.. j,.m. --..:
w.-. -.
' ' y :.
~. -
9 ;.. n 1
_ f Y."& Y.
MQ.'..,
'N h:.
Q_Q. Q.
- - Qn (J
w.
- f.. _ i.p;.l 6.~ _? l?;C..W:G r...:.$*~rl'.a
~.': ' :
~ r.
., ~L Q
- r
.h?
h&,.}.
'ff h:.:.D
'j ~
y-
- e:~.y ggy; y +y _
) h h. k
- y. ' W.$
~
- ~
g ;QLg -[n
-;.]f,Q T '..
j
- W.\\f. g f -
p:Q.g, Q.'
a (Q~gf....
- 3 Q;..... :9c.'Mmer'.E. 5(.:W'M.n4_~Me?6-N.4 "J. '.M-w'CO f u
- v. -
/
~ t,c. N e
.s..
.,cf~'$:.?h*..Y'-(..5:?,bj.Y,:D.~L'% *:f.~'.f.q~?.... - -Y ~ ~.::% ' ' & ' : ~. ~'.E '. *..c.O. a i
u.! c -i... :.
%., ?.:
ri
- n. - ~i
.... n. <.-..- L.. ; r :;. /.... e.
.s..
w.
-9
,..a.....
.o....,.:
. -.. q
- e...
. t '.
....v.;. '
'.'...: : O.,. *. :::
1.:
....:.s
. e:
..v. ;
> ) ?
.e
. [t
?.
.~...s.-[. jg..
.-'d
~
,,:...;.....,,-,r,4,,...*
s.**,....r.8*.#v b.
- .*s.
- d. a
..y.~.f.s..... e e. y gp.
,. y *,... e.....
'. u..
- e..
e m
w
.y.
c; m..
._w: f.. ;i,
.. :_ v ; :,; w; :w:. p*M:. y. :.. ;..+ 4.;' n.%:. :..
....:. ;*.. 4.:w;:. s;s.a.y... <:.; g.;. 4 M,.
~;
..'.r.g. -
x+ ; % 3. * :2v.i
.' *... ' p;;;c. :y.
- , 0.~. 7. :
- s. :;. n::.o.. p ;.x i.z.,,. :.4.,4;;=*....
.>r
.. e,.;.s..t ~4, ;y:.). g.. :.q: a... ~ a.:g; v.,.:.,... r... :.
e,.
\\...v..,.
O...,.: q. w.~r; y...p... ;...
... y n......y..
.. ~ <.
..~......:,
...~ -..
.~
_'.'.*....ri.
e
. :w.#-
+.
~..
...;.v
".f.
d
.sd ell.ed
- 9...JI h5* *..*Uel.'d r
- ~' -' '.h$sJa.%'m
"'2 ' #(.-_'o h
~ ^
O b
d 5
4
-=
Surr: nary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabiJities. and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the."yes/no" questions in
- p perspective.
Explain the deficiencies, and also note the
-e' exceptionally good perfonnance.
--E...
?
e*
CK. x!dM-sp m M Ady.
aus n 4aa w e pys an a
r Y
'., A
~ ' N -dc.
j f
p' C-we, '
. -: : 3 gdup sg 9,n
,=
-a,,
u p
=
r v
mm 4 5% @
L Q Ar. -fugh gn4 s.
a, 0
(,[
Nk s
e V
/cs l J 4e a 1~
A,,o u
~
Mad W
&, a h jcru d {v A t<:-
wa y
kne-iua/R-l.xm.~1 um 2 r
l es4&M.
l Z%
e-@:
@-ccep6(s n
A c.a zj.
{
1 I
l 4..
l l
l
.4
'L FIELD ACTIVITY MODULE
?
I.
Traffic and Access Control Yes No N/A N/0
.3 1.
What traffic or access control point (s) did~you observe-(give location)?
N.
2.
At what time did emergency personnel crrive at the above location (s)? (In-dicate whether arrival time was observed or if you asked them.)
f $O O &S67Adb 3.
Were personnel at each locaton:
- Familiar with the evacuation routes?
t/
5
- Familiar with the location of
-relocation centers?
V~
- Able to comunicate with the Local (or State) EOC by radio?
I i
l
- Able to comunicate with personnel
_c l
at other control points?
j 6
j 4.
Did they periodically report in/get
,/
updates?
V 5.
Were procedures for clearing traffic
/
ob:tructions demonstrated?
s 9 !