ML20105B199
| ML20105B199 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 09/11/1992 |
| From: | Beck G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20105B200 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-90-09, GL-90-9, NUDOCS 9209180224 | |
| Download: ML20105B199 (3) | |
Text
-
PIHLADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR GROUP HEADQUARTERS 955-65 CHESTERBROOK BLVD.
WAYNE, PA 19087-5691 (215) 640 4000 i
September 11, 1992 Docket Nos. 50-277 NUCLEAR SERVICES DEPARTMENT 50-278 4
License Nos. DPR-44 DPR-56 l
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555
SUBJECT:
Peach Bettom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Jechni d Specifations Chunge Request i
REFERENCE:
Letter from G.
J. Beck (PECo) to U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission dated 1
August 5, 1992 Dear Sir In the above referenced letter, Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) submitted, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, Technical Ipecifications Change Request (TSCR) No. 90-14 which requested chances to Appendix A of the Peach Bottem Facility Operating Licenses.
The
~
proposed changes incorporate recommendations specified in NRC Generic Letter (GL) 30-09, "Alternativer Requirements for Snubber Visual Inspection Intervals and Corrective Actlar.s".
PEco hereby requests that our original submittal be revised such that the submitted " List of Tables", page via, be deleted and replaced with the attached revised " List of Tables", page vii.
This correction resolves differences between thn " List of Tables" contained in the PECo controlled copy of the PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 Technic &l Specifications and the NRC's authority file of the PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 Technical Specifications.
1 This issue was discussed between-Tom Loomis (PEco) and Dick Clark (."RC) on August 26, 1992.
Also. attached is Bases page 236a which incorporates wording from TSCR 91-02, Revision 1, dated July 20, 1992 (" Revisions to Allowable Out of Service Times for the Emergency Service Water System") which we' anticipate will bo issued prior to TSCR 90-14.
4 9209180224 920911
//
170044 i
DR ADOCR 05000277
\\
U.1 S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission September.11, 1992 PBAPS Units 2.& 3 Revision to TSCR Page 2 We have determined that this administrative revision does not alter our evaluation of any of the-10 CFR 50.59' standards, and therefore, does not affect our conclusion that TSCR-90-14 does not constitute an unreviewed safety question. We have.also concludeo that the proposed revision does not affect the.Information Supporting a Finding of.No Significant Hazards Consideration and the Information Supporting an Environmental Impact = Assessment.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not heottate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
- / --
i j
G. s ek, Manager Licensing Section
- j
~
Enclosures Proposed TS Page vil, PBAPS, Units 2 and 3 2
Proposed TS Page 236a, PSAPS, Units 2 and 3 cc T. T. Martin, Administrator, Region I, USERC J.
J. Lyash, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, PBAPS N.
P. Dorns3fe, Commonwealth of-Pennsylvania e
C' l
___ =_ _ _ __ ______. - _ -
=d
P8APS Unit 2 LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 4.8.3.c Maximum Values for Minimum Detectable 215d-6 Levels of Activity 4.11.0-1 Snubber Visual Inspection Interval 234t-u
- 3.14.0 I Fire Detectors 240m 3.15 Seismic Monitoring Instrumentation 240u 3.15 Seismic Monitoring Instrumentation 240v Surveillance Requirements 6.2.1 Shif t Crew Composition-Hinin.Jm 245 Requirements i
I vii L-
,a
,e.
r r,-
v.
-