ML20104B585

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revises 920731 Response to Unresolved Item Re Position Indication Verification of RHR HX Bypass valve,RHR-00626. Util Will Incorporate Position Indication Verification of RHR-00626 Into IST Program,Per Discussions W/J Smith (NRC)
ML20104B585
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1992
From: Link B
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
CON-NRC-92-108 VPNPD-92-305, NUDOCS 9209150408
Download: ML20104B585 (2)


Text

_

_. - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ =. _ _ _.. _ _..... _ _ -

!*1 i

i Wisconsin Electnc i

POWER COMPANY I

l 2M w tacriswo kn m mouke. wi 53201 (mWi 210 1

l VPNPD-92-305 NRC-92-108 i

september 9, 1992 Document Control Desk l

U.S. HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Mail Statica P1-137 l

Washington, D.C.

20555 i

Gentlemen:

t DOCKETS.J.Q-266 AND 50-301 ADDITIONAL RESPONSE TO UNRESOLVED ITEME INSPECTION REPORT Ep-266/92008(DRS); 50-301/92008(DRS)

E.OINT BE&g.H NUCLEAILPLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Your letter dated May 28, 1992, transmitted Inspection Report 50-266/ 92008 (DRS) ; 50-301/92008(DRS), which consisted of a review of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant program for in-service testing (IST)-of pumps and valves, and our compliance with NRC positions described in Generic Letter (GL) 89-04, " Guidance on' Developing Acceptable In-Service Testing Programs."

in our letter dated July 31, 1992, we responded to the_ unresolved itema contained in your inspection report.

Based'onLsubsequent diser.asions between our engineering staff and Mr.

J.' Smith of your NkC Region III staff, we have determined it appropriate to. revise our response to one of the unresolved items.

Unresolved Item-266/92008-01(d); 301/92008-01(d) involved position indication verification.of the RHR heat exchanger bypass valve, RH-00626.

In our letter dated July 31(. 1992, we stated that.

position indication verification'of RH-00626_was not necessary

'because-the valve;is not required-to reposition for accident mitigation and consequently is considered passive.

Based oniour discussions.with'Mr. Smith, we have decided to incorporate-position indication _ verification of RH-00626 into-ouriIST_ Program.. We will revise appropriate-Ltest_ procedures by-September.25, 1992. _-Addi-tionally,_we will incorporate the requirement for RH-00626' position indication-verification into the next revision of our IST Program i

Document and IST Program Background Document, which is scheduled-to j

be completed by December 11, 1992.-

7

('l Q

/

4 l

9209150408 920909 r)

PDR--ADOCK 05000266

- G PDR.

(y g,

y,

j e

  • Document Control Denk September 10, 1992 Page 2 i

We believe that these actions are sufficient to adequately resolve this issue.

If you have any questions or require additional information regarding this correspondence, please contact us.

3 Sincorre' /,

\\

f 9

\\

/

)

~

Bob-Link Vice President Nuclear Power

^

I MFB/jg cc:

NRC Regional Administrator, Region III NRC Resident Inspector I

s b

9 l

l 6

, q. h.-

,,,,,5.

n

.y

,,,v.,,,,w, io.,,

-m.,,,,,

g,,,,

-.,.my..,.

,cc,,

oewyd %y k.m,ge,w..

s9,

4--.

r--

9 g