ML20104A727

Forwards Design Info,Submittal 2,Structural Reorientation, W/Current Design Features Reflecting New Licensing Concerns of post-CP Period

ML20104A727
Person / Time
Site:	05000363
Issue date:	03/05/1979
From:	Finfrock I JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20104A729	List: ML20104A727 ML20104A731
References
NUDOCS 7905070466
Download: ML20104A727 (2)

Text

_ _

' ' M ~

l'fHfT.*/l f//f Jersey Central Power & Ught Company

Madison Avenue at Punch Bowt Road Momstown, New Jersey 07960 (201)455 8200 File

2431.4 March 5, 1979 Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Light Water Reactor Branch No. 4 Division of Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

FORKED RIVER NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-363, LICENSE NO. CPPR-96 DESIGN INFORMATION SUBMITTAL #2 - ,

STRUCTURAL REORIENTATION Enclosed are 40 copies of the Forked River Structural Reorientation Information Submittal. This information was generated to show the current Forked River design features that reflect the new licensing concerns of the post-Construction Permit period. Four sets of full size drawings have also been enclosed to aid your review of the submittal.

The submittal provides a summary description of the principle archi-tectural and structural features of the unit. The information contained in the submittal is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 1.2 of Regulatory Guide 1.70, Rev. 3 with regards to the general arrangement of the unit. The additional site characteristics, design criteria, operating characteristics, and safety considerations of the unit will be described fully in the FSAR submittal for Forked River. Although there may be changes between this submittal and the FSAR descriptions, they should be minimal and are not expected to significantly alter the arrangement of the unit.

As described in our meeting of May 3,1977, your review of this sub-mittal is requested, providing the opportunity to identify any major concerns that could be resolved prior to their impacting construction. This process was used for review of the Forked River Containment Pressure Analysis sub-mitted as Design Information Submittal #1 in October 1977 and proved to be useful for both JCP6L and the NRC staff.

We feel this is the best method of communication to insure that all parties concerned are aware of the acceptability of the Forked River arrange-ment. If there is anything that can be done to aid in your review, do not hesitate to ask. (

Very truly yours, ,

5 06

'W t. , 4, /. . /. - O 7f056 70 W h 3 Ivan R. Finfrock , ,Jr.

Vice President jhp /

• A. g grevrous g 7i m'd-

'i Enclosures V Jersey Central Power & Lsnt Company is a Memcer cf the General Pu%c Util.t:es System g

,e ,t Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief ,

Page 2 c6: Mr. Boyce 11. Grier U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commi'.:. ion Washington, DC 20555

%