ML20104A712

Viewgraphs from Braidwood Const Assessment Program (Bcap) Monthly Briefing

ML20104A712
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	12/06/1984
From:	Kaushal N COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20104A649	List: ML20104A698 ML20104A712
References
NUDOCS 8502010472
Download: ML20104A712 (51)

Text

' ' . -_ ', Enclosura 2 Paga 1 of 17 E

4 BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP) i l MONTHLY BRIEFING PRESENTED TO J

REGIONAL OFFICE --

REGION III U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s

N. N. KAUSHAL-BCAP DIRECTOR DECEMBER 6, 198L1 8502010472 850110 PDR ADOCK 05000456 G PDR

. , Enclo:ura 2 ,

Pag 2 2 of 17 PRESENTATION OUTLINE DOCUMENTATION STATUS CSR PROGRESS 4

. RPSR PROGRESS 1

RSCAP PROGRESS MANPOWER STATUS I

SUMMARY

STATUS l

l i

(103f4D)

, J, Enclo:ura 2

, Paga 3 of 17

~

. BCAP DOCUMENTATION STATUS THE PROGRAM DOCUMENT HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCLUDE:

MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES AND CORRECTIONS REVISED CRITERIA ON INSPECTION ATTRIBUTES FOR SAMPLE EXPANSIONS (PER LETTER O' CONN 0R TO KEPPLER, AUGUST 30, 1984)

ELIMINATION OF COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE POSITION l

. I

-(1034D)

t. _

Diclonure 2 Page h of 17

• 4 CSR MAJOR ACTIVITIES

, ESTABLISH INSPECTOR POPULATIONS CERilFICATION i '

t v i

SEL C1 DEV LOP i pb SAMPLES ,

CHECKLISTS l

l 1

l 1

1 , ,

O PREl 'ARE VERIFICAT10N i

l PACKAGES I

i *

I i 1

l PERFORM -

f REINSPECT 1018 /

, 30CUMENTAT1001 REVIEW l

1 .

l -

. PRoch55 OBSERVATIONS I '

l I EVALUATE sweLa '

RESULTS

~ ~ ~ ~ ~g ,

I i t FINAL REPORT (0500J) 4 4 8 6

,; Encle:ura 2 1

, Pasa 5 of 17  !

l CSRi ESTARI ISHMENT OF POPUL ATIONS IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION CATEGORIES:

l

)

35 CATEGORIES.(P0PULATIONS) IDENTIFIED TO DATE 29 0F 35 POPULATION DESCRIPTIONS WRITTEN IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS IN POPULATION:

I 17 0F 35 COMPLETE 1

1 4

l (1034D)

- -- - - - - - .n -

r- ,. - , -

Enclo2ura 2 Paga 6 of 17 CSR- SAMPLE SFIECTION RAND 0M PORTION:

13 0F 35 POPULATIONS COMPLETE i .

ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT PORTION:

BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW COMMENCED i

f i

4 i

I l

l l

1 (1034D)

~

Ehclosure 2

, Page 7 of 17 CSR: DEVEL OPMFNT OF CHECKl ISTS POPULATION-SPECIFIC CHECKLISTS:

18 0F 35 REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS PREPARED 5 0F 35 DOCUMENTATION CHECKLISTS PREPARED 14 APPROVED FOR PACKAGE PREPARATION GENERIC CHECKLISTS:

5 0F 10 GENERIC CHECKLISTS PREPARED 3 WELDING CHECKLISTS COMPLETED (1034D)

• Enclosura 2

, Page 8 of 17

.,' CSR- PREPARATION OF VERIFICATION PACKAGES

~

310 PACKAGES IN 7 POPULATIONS ARE RELEASED FOR REINSPECTION 30 DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PACKAGES COMPLETED (1034D) f l .

Bielo:ura 2 Faga 9 of 17

'. CSR- INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION LEVEL III 4 DISCIPLINES CERTIFIED CIVIL / STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL WELDING ELECTRICAL LEVEL II.

4 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL 9 MECHANICAL ,

10 WELDING 3 ELECTRICAL l

22 INSPECTORS CERTIFIED I

I

(

-.m ~ . . -

Ehclosura 2 Paga 10 of 17 CSR- REINSPECTIONS AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS REINSPECTIONS:

COMMENCED OCTOBER 5, 1984 225 COMPLETE AS OF DECEMBER 4, 1984 392 OBSERVATION REPORTS WRITTEN '

DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS:

NOT STARTED 1

(1034D) .

Enclosura 2 Page 11 of 17 I RPSR MAJOR ACTIVITFS OVERALL RPSR CONSISTS OF THREE PRINCIPAL STEPS:

IDENTIFY APPLICABLE SARGENT.& LUNDY SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES.

PREPARE CHECKLISTS INCLUDING:

CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FROM FSAR AND SPECIFICATIONS PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION / CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS REVIEW CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES AGAINST CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS l .

(1034D)

~

~

Enclotura 2 Page 12 of 17 RPSR PROGRESS -

CONT'D IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICABLE SARGENT & LUNDY SPECIFICATIONS:

9 SPECIFICATIONS APPLICABLE IDENTIFICATION.0F CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES:

500 PROCEDURES FROM 9 CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED APPLICABLE 1

l l

l l

l (1034D) ,

, - .- , -~

l

Enclosure 2 Page 13 of IT RPSR PROGRESS -

CONT'D o

IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN FSAR:

REVIEW COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN NINE APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS:

APPR0XIMATELY 80% COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION / CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS:

COMPLETED (1034D)

Enclosura 2

, Paga 14 of 17

. RPSR PROGRESS -

CONT'D COMPARIS0N OF CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS TO CONTRACTOR PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS:

WALKTHROUGH CONDUCTED TO CHECK WORKABILITY OF PROCEDURAL STEPS IDENTIFICATION OF CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS NOT C0VERED BY CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES:

WALKTHROUGH CONDUCTED TO CHECK WORKABILITY OF PROCEDURAL STEPS l

l

.(1034D)

Enclosure 2 Page 15 of 17

~

RSCAP PROGRESS ALL SCAPS (LISTED BELOW) ARE UNDER RSCAP REVIEW:

QUALITY CONTROL STRUCTURAL STEEL REVIEW SAFETY RELATED PIPE SUPPORTS NSSS COMPONENT SUPPORTS QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR REINSPECTION (ON HOLD)

ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW REINSPECTION OF SAFETY RELATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

• HVAC WELDING, CONFIGURATION, STIFFENERS FITTINGS PIPING MATERIAL VERIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY INSTRUMENTATION INSTALLATION VERFICATION l

l (1034D)

o j Encloture 2 Page 16 of 17

,' RSCAP PROGRESS CONT'D l

l l

RSCAP ELECTRICAL LEAD WHO.WAS TEMPORARILY ASSIGNED  ;

TO CSR FOR CERTIFICATION AS LEVEL III ELECTRICAL )

INSPECTOR HAS BEEN RETURNED TO RSCAP Y

l (103flD) i

e Enclosure 2 Page 17 of 17 l

• l e *

, l m

- M

\

W W

- C

\

m

! m 4

. O

\

N <

2 l m i e

- e f

, e y , /r

f / s W W

a -

N 2 N 4 v4 E - > 2 e m'r,M a:e M ,w w2:r. 2:

/ 5' W /

/ R :@m :,",  : Y:.L 7::w:.2f.::f.2:;:$.4'4:w;u.!tQ:t:fl@:r

:exw:p. ,. cps 2 :o t:xt:ma 1:".l:2 w g:L:p;ff:<  :!ff:: lie 5

W WN N[LTE$$$$S4$"95

• E M

/ [MEIT.v. l '2:h

@3

$N';: );;

fl.'. . ' i

%i '2lh$ , $E "- i@;22 <k$ w=4

/ ..:Of#sexl z.<dieMd"#s" 6 . , .MyHMMi..4!!:49?.!!@Rie.g43 : v4 -

, 1.<

• • ;r <

r

-s: ;s.;: .#

nw.g u. >.. e.c p. 2.v2 - g. ..., p ..w

: w@ s1:n; .q+. W

< 3.:g:M:!:

S. L"  ;&#h2!7f:iy; '

i?4ii3!752  :. gn  ;;:53g3 ;va W ; J .

2::"#;%ih[:d w ,<

q :"e.e::p:c

. ?; w,g:

.ipl Ad e

.'.:: . ?#X5:b;:;.. TW:

muis

$;'!;* 32<:q =mr

." 11 zg1 a'

q cm N

s I:.i,0 5:Q:. . 0 w a::;:'l  :

1 CAW:n12:g; .# m:.:. :*[f;Yg'

//' (:s" .e:...2. v

.,f< ,%... ..t..f,. Af.%.r:. ~:W

.. ..+

s,..

4'

p,.-.,,,. .

%h:(:-::

.,~.::-

nee,  ;:d.. -i:"" w $. .: , ' . .s.,  :.fp~s,te.t]2 c.

'W.v.

4,ifx..::.M.v"v, v14 . 6, w-4

[, dptg"* 'O': ,;i430 -

" E4 ..i

• :{.{R :1e h

) s&s.K " -4: p,;: .to

>; 1,1 ;3eK;h'  ! v.s ef .;.:

.'.a.

4 L:e::: ::) ;4;j::*-

4 R(4 e:s e

'4E:q;4":hf*ifK:

t:

ad1 0:,.."R** ,

$?$: .:21

"; :JE.*: '-

\

',....m..-.

{:.gy<W. tiff :3.:%.iR. ;;

..".. . . . .c .', . .w. u .c.v ,./

7. .;.-M,,

,L .ffc./:t. .-:5.,9sf;&.9 a h .f.t'l m 2,v.f %ev::-

f?

fe.,w,;;,3.:...

.va w , ,,g.v. ' . 9..p,es',M" 3

,,,,, D

.. g

, , ' ,y sc.

, w. .c g

l ,

.wi ..,i*A1I.)*E:!: 77.  %:t' '&,h. ': 4; M :4d .4 ...R Tlit'M i:*<>^ $X:Pa;k.Z:J. ,

.. .se,f?'.. ice.<

b

, )  !

[ .M,e tq<

7 "t':;s.dfi. .<..,

,-:'w'T A i

.:..e'.'b,.. ; ;y,' *4' ,. ,e .,<;g';"'

. . .X M,. M ,.. .w . . :0,.' .-... ,- +;4;X. .,4,; ,.

A. ..M.(IM'

.i; g p*e.

W

• ^

l . .v /A '*<  :;  :',)'.4 l' e/ 'M is 'A 2.;':t :4.,s'%.4fis

/.,., ,.', .,. i ,

.,d,  :'#":/i< .*iiM :a

,- ' Z.:; %.v; .:4.:,.<..5"",<.

l . .v= .w <a , . < . .-

'c .

,v, w m ".4.., .

g:,',e .l,. :R-i,g' fi ,. ... ..

.< .4.. .< y*' -

g . ,.u .. . .T. .

,j " '.

1. 4 .4m,

+

- '.A

x,;(. =..w .v -

x. - .

.  :)..

. . . .. . , ,.., . , .m . u ,,<

lt:<

<~. -.

, ..<.. , ! CD

.p's ,cf lh1:47;  ;. . "" '

e p #.f : 9 *2-l:R' pd f@ '

1it .. :.*

a* -^/

r ,, ,

K E. la.,:c " fa,m. ,.~m,4.,:f.t,. 0.,.:::a;

.x.. .

/ , R0 22 g::s a . .s a 2s s

f:4 i:32 2i !' % '

.v

'$  ::!:26 CD

! ,,. l:l::;tia d : . :J:: ?.Q \

..y/e.

.s, , ,,,/,.  ::t": ":.)

it .

.:t:^ :.x:::.:

e ,':.,/.::v:s" :.::,:!:):::f:..i .

P'-

g ..

../g::, .

y  ;:p::,:k:::Fzg":i,

,te:1

p . . " :sl i,:.p"#xt -

i' m v:.:. :

':: fg '.% *".::

e. 3: .;$[i:# s O ,

'.g i; niill*

l o

1.LJ Q,,, i.pQei: h:ii.!!h

?':D I I I I I I I I l [

1 8 8 m e e a e, e a e m o ., 8 m ,

e c .o m m a ,,4

12-06-8I4 Enclosure 3 CSR DISCREPANCIES BY CONTRACTOR

)

1 e

CONTRACTOR POPULATION RECEIVED COMPIITED l

COMSTOCK CABLE PAN HANGERS 1 0 PULLMAN DUCTS 30 5 EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 1 1 1 DUCT HANGERS 27 6 PHILLIPS GETSCHOW SMALL BORE PIPING 3 2 NEWBURG CONCRETE PLACEMENT 11 5 k

TOTALS 73 19 t

l

'l

12-06-84 Enclosure 3 Page 2 of 9 CSR DISCREPANCIES BY CAT GORY CATEGORY RECEIVED COMPLETED WELDING - UNDERCUT, UNDERSIZE, POROSITY 31 4 l

4 DIMENSIONAL - LOCATION, LENGTH 9 4 BOLTING - LOOSE, MISSING, PATTERN 7 2 CONCRETE SURFACE DEFECT 6 1 DUCT DAMAGE - DENTS, HOLES 3 1 WRONG MATERIAL - GAUGE, SIZE 4 -

INCOMPLETE HVAC - SEALANT, CONNECTION

, 2 -

EMBEDMENTS 3 1 HVAC FIT-UP - DUCT, HANGERS, DAMPER 2 1 FABRICATION - CABLE PAN HANGER FIELD FAB 1 -

INVALID - NOT DISCREPANT, NOT SAFETY RELATED 5 5 73 19 9 0 1

j l -

Enclosure 3

__ . ..Enge 3 of 9 .

i ~ , ,,, , , .,

BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASUE55 MENT FROUJUUt l ,, CSR WELD MILP ,

, Population: W4d ff'd '$ /As// SM* on Units is2 6

2dentification Noa cs A -r- 4# O S Commonwealth Edison Company I Safe y Belated observation Record Nosd*5717rsee-/#2 .

Package nos d* 5Pe#v.s.s ~~ "I *

• Draniap no: M-ISto~t % M nettaion no.

Appresiaate Elevation: SS9 'f, Page of Equipment

Description:

1. v% 4. 44dreKR component Noa /e7 I r5 y i x-~wr cavasture -ee -

g..

r Q

za pactor mig C M Date Inspected: N- /- F"/ 7 -

ru.a i -v *- { '

s I . 2:s , N 4- -

u\x .

= h c

hhf+s _

tui (approximate zecation)

. o I /

\

k(

s

+

e

+Y f % Yl \ "Yri t

\

i

/g g / '

-s *a

[

a -

a i

s<m We@

e~ e g, w** ; , ,'

SEC.T M A -4 g. de, wou ,,,w w.c.a. sa.r w Inp

,' s

~ e-i s

I i l l

/l M

4+

VI O hl l

M _

1 J

A '* ,

l

. Enclosure 3

~

Page h of 9 i .

BRAIDIf000 CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM CSR WILD MRP Wold Mao continuation '

( Mraidwood Station Units 1 Zdentification No: 6S R -T-M .09 -

D" /

,, 3 Observation Record No &7-I-N-cc-cat 3 /D Safety. Related Weckage no (*S M-E N-d F M * \ Calculation No:

Clamponent No u -7 \ Revision No ,

Drawing No: /f-/5/D-/ Arv# Page .of Zaapactor '

Signatarea =ssES M nate zampacted: ' /r-e-M mg e ar *f 7 , ,

I 4

l /4' b:

/

: .N a o

i sm* .

o

'I'l'

- man Tamsas, i

i TOS t#

g

$./syr

\  ; r. uAw%

hoaam on-seg I e W

w/ % y r AYrs.\b" YI L. $

e

• 3 e

• e

Enclosure 3 WELD pl6CEEPANGlEs

" ~

ON HVAC SUPPORTS 4 '

l 4

4 N.

- h6/ MIN. As pMI6N N .i 4's"AS'*u'LT l

Y!' souse j

'N il I

. I l I, l sto umuur IN Har.lz py 74 g I '#

i, PETAIL A i. *' '

I I

' l (# #A% ST*l P85F

• b' KE ,

Gaua,ap u,4 l / l i

. .u y.

M PEEP' .

I

/ LE' #N YEgt Led eq uariz.

I V N ButLT ,

7 9.

/

(V x^* PEGIGNEp og ELEVATION DETAll A

- - . . . a

- - - - - - ~ ~~ ~

Enclosure 3 SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS Page 6 of 9 l

IN,  !

CONCRETE WALL AND COLUMN

~,

WALL

• a g

'.* a SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS g

E ,

A a~ b y _

I

'. y COLUMN l AJ 0 "

- e, # m D 0 i ,

'0 o

, ELEVATION 7, 357'-0" --

, 8 y

ya 7 O l h,'

D p.,<>

• e ' )

PLAN - . .

0.

~,

o SECTION 'B-B' a O 'O 8 '

-g g ELEVATION e

lP r 357'-0" i , ,,4,

. l .

g-  :

) I k

)

I ^

16'q , a g '* ,

4'. j 7 # l g

/

SECTION 'A-A' -

- l 4

4

CORNER DANAGE ON AN $'$ESS VAC DUC-~

\

N DENT lief LONG,lh' DEEP,1l+2' DIAMETER l

l

Page 8 of 9 DIMEN610NAL DISCREPANCIE6 OF A FORMED OPENING IN A CONCRETE SLA8 G' A6-DESIGNED 12" 7kg' AS-BUILT i, % .-

g a

i , l

, u

?::{*

• e 'x%

4..\

. A, :)! ' .i

.... ~'s ....

8 , ,. -

N. .

.W

-,..e

'%.  :?.'#?II

.-:_ . e.

.% .f ' :li .' :"

i. 9:g.-

l.

l

LINEAR INDICATION IN Enclosure 3 BVAC DUCT TO STIFFENER WELDS Page 9 of 9 a

y DETAIL B I

I p

DETAIL A I

l i

1/8" g t

l 1/8" I

y i LINEAR r INDICATIONS DETAIL A DETAIL B

'. Enclosure h Page 1 of 13 t

l BCAP 0.A.

MONTHIY BRIFFING N. P. SMITH '

DECFMBFR S. 1984 i

(0183B) f.

u _ _ __ _ . _ .-. - - . _ _ -,

Enclorura h Page 2 of 13 0 ORGANIZATION / PERSONNEL 0 DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS 0 DOCUMENT REVIEWS 0 AUDIT / SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULES AND RESULTS

~

0 0.A. OVERINSPECTION/0VERVIEW 0 HOLD POINTS l (0183B) i l . - . -

i Enclorura h l Pags 3 of 13 )

l l

e l

ORGANT7ATION/PFRSONNFl 9

2 0 LEAD CSR POSITION HAS BEEN FILLED e

0 ONE ENGINEER HAS BEEN ADDED .

I r

(0183B)

PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE LEVELS (AVERAGE YEARS)

POSITIONS OVERALL NUCLEAR Q.A.

t NOV. 5 DEC. 6 NOV. 5 DEC. 6 NOV. 5 DEC. 6 GENERAL SUPERVISOR - Q.A.

LEAD ELENENT ENGINEERS 22.9 22.4 15.9 14.2 5.0 4.6 OVERINSPECTION SUPERVISOR Q.A. ENGINEERS / SPECIALISTS INSPECTORS 17.4 17.4 8.3- 8.3 N/A- N/A

+ 1 ENGINEER ASSIGNED i

Y 50 "2

42 U"

(0183B)'

e_4 -- - A n s a _ - a - -- --

e _ 4 ,- -

Encloruro k' Paga 5 of 13 o

DFVELOPMFNT EFFORTS (NOVEMBER) i i

t 1

0 REVISED 1 Q.A. SPECIAL INSTRUCTION 1

l e

f i

(0183B) 1

Enclozura b Page 6 of 13 DOCUMFNT REVIEWS J

(NOVEMBER).

I REVISIONS TO POLICY / PLANS 3 REVISIONS T0 PROCEDURES / INSTRUCTIONS 10 e

LESSON PLANS 0 J

. EXAMINATION QUESTION BANKS 0

CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS 0

~

~

REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS / INSTRUCTIONS 22 l INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION PACKAGES 6 41 1

-(0183B) i _

BCAP Q.A. SURVEILLANCE sci lEDULE SHEET 1 OF 1 (ANNUAL)

- SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE

- COMPLETED SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITY /

SU33ECT AREA MONTH SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 07 14 21 28 CSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-20 XIX XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl BCAP-21 XlX XIXl XIXl XIXl XIXl XI BCAP-22 XIXl XIXl XlXl XIXl Xl BCAP-23 XIX XIXl XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl BCAP-24 XIXl - XIXl XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl RPSR - PROCEDURES BCAP'-41 XIXl XllXI XIXl XIXl XlXl Xl BCAP-42 XIXl X lXl XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl i BCAP-43 XIXl XI Xl XIXl XIXl RSCAP - PROCEDURES

• BCAP-60 XIXl XIXl XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl ADMIN. - PROCEDURES BCAP-01 XIXl XIXl XlXI- XIXl Xl BCAP-02 XIXl XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl BCAP-03 -

XIXl XIXl XIXl XIX XI BCAP-04 XlXI XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl BCAP-06 XIXl XIXl XlXI XIXl XI BCAP-07 X Xl XIX X XI XIXl BCAP-08 Xl XI g@

X XIX XI Xl XIXl XI gg N 0' R

t;%

(01835) j

~

' BCAP Q.A. AUDIT SCHEDULE SHEET 1 OF 1 ~ '

(ANNUAL)

SCHEDULED AUDIT

- COMPLETED AUDIT t

ACTIVITY / -

SUBJECT AREA MONTH SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 0*l 14 21 28 CSR - PROCEDURES BCAP ,!O XIXl XIXl BCAP-21 XIXl XIXl BCAP-22 XlXl XlXl BCAP-23 XlXl Xl BCAP-24 XlXl Xl RPSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-41 XIXl X 'Xl BCAP-42 XlXI XLXl BCAP-43 XlXl Xl RSCAP - PROCEDURES BCAP-60 XIXl XIXl ADMIN. - PROCEDURES BCAP-01 XIXl XIXl BCAP-02 XIXl XIXl BCAP-03 XlXI XIXl BCAP-04 XIXl XIXl BCAP-06 XIXl XIXl BCAP-O'l XIXl XlXl yg BCAP-08 XIXl XIXl gg co O Week of December 14, 1984 new procedure BCAP-25 will be audited.

• S t;"

(01833) .

' Enclosure h Page 9 of 13 AUDIT AND SilRVElli ANCF RFSUI TS -

(NOVFABER)

FIT)INGS AND ITt:MS PROCFDURFS OP : 9FD C .OSFD 2 1 BCAP ADMIN PROCEDURES 0 1 BCAP CSR PROCEDURES 0 0 BCAP RSCAP PROCEDURES 0 0 BCAP RPSR PROCEDURES 2 2 TOTAL 1 ITEM OPENED INVOLVED FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES 1 ITEM OPENED INVOLVED PROCEDURE INADEQUACY l

l l

(0183B) m---<~; _i

Enclosura h Paga 10 of 13 AUDIT AND SURVFIII ANCF RESul TS (TO-DATF)

)

{

I PROCFDURFS FIWDIyGS AND ITEMS OP ENF3 CLOSED BCAP ADMIN PROCEDURES 11 9 -

BCAP CSR PROCEDURES 9 7 BCAP RSCAP PROCEDURES 1 1 BCAP RPSR PROCEDURES 0 0 l TOTAL 21 17 1

l O

e O

(0183B)

r-Enclo:ure h Pag: 11 of 13 0.A. OVERINSPECTION/0VERVIEW .

0 OVERINSPECTIONS TO RECORD HAVE NOT BEGUN 0 REVISED 0.A. OVERINSPECTION PROCEDURE 0 RECERTIFYING 0.A. OVERVIEW INSPECTORS TO PTL'S RECENTLY REVISED PROCEDURE PRIOR TO START OF INSPECTIONS l

1 I

l (0183B)

., =- . _

r Enclosure h Page 12 of 13 0.A. OVFRINSPFCTION/0VERVIFW VAIIDATION METHOD 0 THE VALIDATION METHOD REQUIRES A COMPLETE OVERINSPECTION O PROVIDES A SIGNAL TO THE OVERINSPECTOR AS TO POTENTIAL PROBLEM AREAS 0 ALLOWS THE OVERINSPECTOR TO FOCUS ON AREAS WHERE DIFFERENCES IN INSPECTION RESULTS EXIST 0 'PROVIDES FOR EFFICIENT USE OF OVERINSPECTION TIME (0183B)

Enclosura 14

.- Paga 13 of 13

j. .

HOLD POINTS PURPOSE: TO PUT BCAP-0.A. IN A PRO-ACTIVE MODE IN ASSURING QUALITY O BCAP Q.A. LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1984 PLACED HOLD POINT ON

- IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLETED CHECKLISTS FOR CSR

- INSPECTOR PERFORMANCE OF FIELD INSPECTIONS 0 CSR CHECKLISTS - HOLD RELEASED BY SPECIFIC POPULATION

~

FOLLOWING Q.A. APPROVAL 0 INSPECTORS - HOLD RELEASED FOR INDIVIDUAL INSPECTORS FOLLOWING Q.A. CERTIFICATION REVIEW I

i i e (0183B)

P s-

- , , BCAP STATUS 82 MEETI4G

. for November, 1984 INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP g L

December 6, 1984

.' Enclosure 5 Page 2 of 6 TOPICS o Executive Summary o Overview Activities o Closed Issues and Concerns o Open Issues and Concerns I

( .

$$ $$ 0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

o .BCAP OVERVIEW Functioning as designed with checks and bal ances in pl ace.

o CSR ELEMENT.

Refinement of rough edges still in prog-ress. Activities' focusing on retraining of personnel and revisions to some checklists.

Electrical inspections initiated. ERC's electrical inspector reported November 26, 1984.

o RPSR ELEMENT Checklists nearing complet. ion. Actual review of procedures near commencement.

o RSCAP ELEMENT Determination of relevant commitments still in progress. .

o BCAP QA Increased number of Lead Auditors from one to five for better distribution of audit l o ad.

R;'T:;i OVERVIEW ACTIVITIES

( REINSPECTIONS o Surfaced two concerns in civil /

structural area Control points for reinspections Reinspection of embeds on Class 2 side of Turbine Isolation Wall o Monitoring resolution of " Hold Tag" l for areas to be reinspected by BCAP inspectors AUDITS o>

Monitored BCAP QA audits DOCUMENTATION REVIEW o Initiated reviews of BCAP observations and S&L Design Significant Evaluations o Maintained reviews of checklists, procedures and pl ans

• • Enclosure 5 Page.5 of 6 .'

l CLOSED ISSUES / CONCERNS ISSUES

, 1) Revision of documents:

a) BCAP QA P1an

. 2) Response to Observataions BCAP-0BS-i -003 and BCAP-0BS-004 CONCERNS

1) Inspector certifications - Level III

Electrical has been certified 1

l L _ _ __ ___. _ ... . . - - - . - - - . .. . - .. _ _ _ - _ .

~

N$ 5% 5

1 OPEN. ISSUES / CONCERNS ISSUES

1) Revisions of documents:

a) BCAP Program Document CONCERNS

1) Control points for reinspections

2) Resolution on " Hold Tags" for areas to be reinspected by BCAP inspectors

3) Resolution of inspector reinspection

. element of RSCAP 4-) Evaluation of CSR discrepancies to the most adverse location within the popul ation

'b Enclosure 6 Items Discussed at the NRC/ Ceco /ERC Meeting December 6, 1984, 9:00 A. M. .

Q. Has BCAP determined how they will address hardware inspections for the RSCAP Element of the program?

A. BCAP feels that this will be satisfied once the Engineering Judgement Sample has been selected for the CSR element. Engineering Judgement portion of the samples has not been as yet identified.

Q. When will the document review portion of CSR inspections start?

A. It is expected to start the week of 12-10-84.

Q. Does Sargent & Lundy ever need to obtain more information before they can i disposition discrepancy reports?

A. Yes, when additional information is required Sargent and Lundy requests

! it. An example of this is the detailed weld maps requested from BCAP.

Q. When will BCAP Q.A. be ready to discuss the results of their inspection review?

A. BCAP Q.h. will be prepared to discuss the inspection review with the NRC during the week of 12-10-84.

l Q. Does the 1800 plan to review all the Non Design Significant discrepancies? ,

1 A. They plan to review all of the early ones and will adjust the number reviewed as the program develops.

l 1

1

] 0689J

l i \

(

l l

l The NRC stated that the presentation of observations evaluated to date was good and asked that this presentation be continued in the next meeting.

The NRC stated that they would continue to follow the establishment of the hardware inspections pertaining to the RSCAP Element of the BCAP. They will discuss it further once the method has been established.

In conclusion the NRC stated that they feel that the BCAP is going along

well. They felt that all personnel associated with the effort are doing a l

Very good job, and that they were comfortable with the effort at this time.

The next meeting was set for January 3, 1985, 9:00 a.m. at the Mazon E.O.F.

This concluded the presentation from Ceco to the NRC. At this time the NRC opened the meeting for questions to the NRC from the public.  ;

There was a comment from a member of the public regarding the need to include the consideration of highly stressed items in the reinspection sample. In response discussion it was stated that commonwealth Edison can be expected to be prepared to address this issue.

There being no further questions. the meeting was adjourned.

l I

4 i

)

i .

0689J

Enclosuro 7 List cf Attendee 2

. EtB POSITION ORGANIZATION R. A. Gardner Reactor Inspectcr Region III, NRC R. F. Warnick Chief, Branch 1 Region III, NRC A. B. Davis Deputy Regional Admin. Region III, NRC R. D. Schulz Sr. Resident - Braidwood Region III, NRC L. G. McGregor SRI Braidwood Region III, NRC W. L. Forney

, Chief, Projects Sociton 1 A Region III, NRC B. Heishman Branch Chief Reactor Prog. Branch Region III, NRC R. J. Lauer Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal E. D. Swartz Nuclear Licensing Admin. Ceco D. Cassel Attorney PBI

c. W. Schroeder Proj. Lic. & Compliance Supt. Ceco P. A. Lau BCAP Q.A.. C2Co D. H. Smith Nuclear Licensing Adm. CECO J. D. Deress Proj. Eng. Mgr, BY/BR Ceco V. A. Hoffaan Site Manager of SWBC SWBC M. I. Miller Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal A. Scaccia Off Site Baer. Planner Ceco D. L. Leone Projects Eng. Mgr. - BY & BR Ceco G. F. Marcus Director of Quality Assurance Ceco G. M. Orlov Asst. Director BCAP CECO i R. L. Byers Asst. Director BCAP Ceco t

K. T. Mostal Project Director Braidwood S&L R. E. Ham 180G, Asst. Project Manager ERC B. R. Shelton Projects Eng. MGR Ceco

! N. P. Smith General Supervisor - QA CECO i

! D. L. Shamblin Proj. Const. Superintendent Ceco I

i E. E. Fitzpatrick Asst. Manager QA Ceco 4

i T. J. Maiman Manager of Projects Ceco 1

i N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director CECO L. S. Weiss BCAP - SWBC Deputy Mg. SWEC l D. L. Farrar Nuclear Licensing Ceco W. L. Chase Consultant ERC R. B. Laney Consultant. ERC .

l I. M. Johnson Nuclear Communications Ceco M. J. Wallace Project Mgr. Ceco ,

'0672J i

BRAIDWOOD STATION BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM l REPORT PERIOD NOVEMBER 1, - NOVEMBER 30, 1984 I. SUt99LRY/ STATUS 4

This is the fifth monthly Progress Report on the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP), covering the period from November 1, through November 30, 1984.

During this period, CSR inspections have progressed on six populations and preparation of additional inspection packages has continued. In the RPSR effort, checklist preparation continued with the accumulation of

. construction requirements from FSAR and Sargent and Lundy specification sources. Progress continues on all active programs in the RSCAP element.

As of November 30, the number of personnel assigned to the BCAP effort has risen to 96. Satisfactory office and clerical support continues to be available to the BCAP workforce.

II. SCHEDULE ANALYSIS l The rescheduling effort initiated in November continues. A final draft of the Project Summary Schedule has been completed, reflecting current status, and established resources. Final review is expected to be completed during the first week of December.

III. PERSONNEL AND BOUIPMNT STATUS BCAP manpower totaled 96 as of November 30, 1984. A total of five i Inspectors (Level II and Level III) were certified during November.

Inspection personnel activities included training, accessibility walkdowns, reinspections and weld mapping.

The Mapper Data Base, for tracking observations and verification packages, is being updated regularly. Reports are issued monthly, and interim reports are available on an "as required" basis.

IV. BCAP BLEMENT STATUS l

A. CSR STATUS During this period, preparation of visual inspection packages and i performance of inspections continued. New and revised checklists l- and instructions were issued. At this time, six populations are I being inspected: HVAC Ducts, Duct Hangers, Concrete Placements, Small Bore Pipe Configurations, Large Bore Pipe Configurations and conduits.

(0631J)

l 1

In addition to the six populations now being inspected, packages for  ;

the random portion of the sample are being assembled in preparation i for inspection for the following populations: Large Bore Pipe l Jupports (Rigid), Large Bore Pipe Supports (Non Rigid), Small Bore 1 Pipe Supports, Small Bore Pipe Configuration - Documentation Review, l HVAC aquipment, and Conduit Hangers. Technical review of 29 of ~10 l

' checklists and instructions has been completed; 16 have been signed l out and are in various stages of review by 9.A., Sargent and Lundy, {

and IEOG. Checklists and instructions for the remaining populations in each discipline are being developed.

Work has started on identifying portions of the samples based on

engineering judgement, During November, the nualier of certified inspectors increased to a total of 22. This total reflects the addition of one Electrical

, Level III and three Electrical Level II inspectors. To date 226 inspections have been completed with 343 observations recorded.

B. RPSR STATUS During November, the RPSR group continued to be primarily involved in listing construction requirements from the FSAR and applicable Sargent & Lundy specifications on checklists. Two additional j specifications were identified during the month as within the scope of the RPSR effort, This increased the number of specifications involved from seven to nine and the ntsaber of anticipated checklists

. from 21 to 23. Nineteen of the 23 checklists have been partially

! finished. Resolution of seven items affecting the applicability of l construction requirements and final reviews remain to be done. All checklists are scheduled to be completed by December 21, 1984.

Procedural reviews are scheduled to start in mid December. This i

involves comparing construction and personnel qualification /

certification requirements on checklists with those in contractor I

procedures. This work is scheduled to be completed in February.

l The overall RPSR effort is now expected to be completed in February 1985. This delay in expected completion of RPSR resulted from an increase in (1) the ntsaber of specifications requiring review, (2) the number of codes and standards requiring '

incorporation in checklists, (3) the anticipated effort to resolve items affecting the content of checklists, and (4) the anticipated time to review FSAR and Requirement / Procedure checklists.

, (0631J)

y l

1 C. RSCAP STATUS i

During this period, the RSCAP plan and schedules were updated and the procedure governing RSCAP activities (BCAP-60) was revised to reflect working experience to date. All RSCAP programs have proceeded past the '

connitment approval cycle.

l

The nine RSCAP programs have progressed as follows

i

a. Quality control Structural Steel Review - 85%.

b. Safety Related Pipe Supports - 80%.

c. NSSS Component Supports - 60%.

d. Electrical Installation Documentation Review - 40%.

e. Quality control Inspector Reinspection Program has been placed on hold.

f. Reinspection of Safety Related Mechanical quipment - 25%

! g. HVAC Welding, configuration, stiffeners, fittings - 40%.

h. Piping Heat Number Traceability - 30%.

i. Instrumentation Installation verification - 25%

V. PROBLEMS /DISCREPENCY FINDINGS A. Implementation Problems Certification of a Level III inspector for the electrical descipline, which was reported as a potential problem last month, was accomplished in November. Inspections in the electrical descipline are now underway.

B'. DiscreDanCV Findings As reported in Section IV a total of 343 observation reports have been written as of Nov 30, 1984. Of these the review for valididity has been completed on 94. Of these, 91 have been determined to be valid discrepancies and have been forwarded to Sargent & Lundy for review for design significance.

To date S&L has not identified any discrepancy as design significant.

VI. BBCottlENDATIONS No specific reconnendations are offered at this time.

n.n.kau4dt N. M. Kaushal BCAP Director (0631J)

-- --_. - -. -- . - _ . _