Text

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. January-March 1992
	ML20101R932
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/30/1992
From:	; NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	;
References
	NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V35-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V35-I1, NUDOCS 9207160275
	Download: ML20101R932 (38)
	v • d • e

. _. _

J 4

l l

NUREG-0750 Vol. 35 index 1 i

l INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.lSSUANCES January - Marc 11992 l

4 0

g 9

i U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t

9207160275 920630 0

0R PDR

i l

l l

NUREG-0750 Vol. 35 Index 1 INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES l

January:- March 1992 l

Gk 1'

U S. NUCLiiAfl REGULhTdE' COMMISSION,.

l-l l

I

__-.___._._.-_-_.__.___._.-.-_....-___y i

l

- l.

Available from

{

Superintentandont of Documents U.S. Governmont Printing Offico Post Offico Box 37082 Washington, D.C. 20013-7082 A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues, 4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbo#,ind editions for this publication.

Single copios of this publication are available from National Technical information Servico Springfield VA 2k 61 Errors in this publication may be reported to tho -

Division of Froodom of information and Publications Sorvices Offico of Administ.ation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

- Washington, DC 20555 (301/492-8925)

'Te w-v-T' wM-wwe7ma--1 m-ww-wv-+-

ile 1e w-w-ie=+---W

'--y e-dwi-'y-4

,----g

-fy9-g-'

vey-y-,-ww'+

ia-W~+-*-ap***

,p g

T mb-El#M(P+Tm-et~dN=etw-7'i--m-H4iT

I i

fJUREG-0750 Vol. 35 Index 1 INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMVilSSION ISSUANCES January - March 1992 i

l l

l i

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Prepared by the Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Servicos Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 (391/492-8925)

A arme

---.,.<,,n,-,-,-.--..s va,----

-.~v--,---w am--

a.--.

e.

,,-e, e

-w n

er-----

i COMMISSIONERS Ivan Selin, Chairmv1 Kenneth C Rogers James R. Cudiss Forrest J. Remick E. Gail do Planque D. Paul Cotts, Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel t

/

\\\\

l l

l I-

'd

4F-u

-y-,

w-r

'-m'-*w Teg-'

'e-T-WP--,-

c'-T-

-y w

+y-y

-www gy-r

Foreword Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LilP), the Administrative law Judges (AU),

the Directors' Decisions (DD), 'and the Denials of l\\'titions for Rulemaking (DPRM) are presented in this doeurnent. These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

Case name (owner (s) of facility)

Full text reference (volume and pagination)

Issuance number Issues raised by appellants Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)

Name of facility, Docket number p

Subject matte of issues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit, operating license, etc.)

Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

These inform:stion elements are displayed in one or more of five scrcrate formats arranged as foll9ws:

1 Case Name Index The case name inde;, is an alphabetical arrangen,ent of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full tcat reference.

2 Digests and lleaders The headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing floard Panel (LilP),

the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisions (D1)), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM).

The header identifies the issuanto by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearir.g, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

'Ihe digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. II a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically, til

________.m._-_._.m._

3. I.egal Citations Indn -

This index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alphanu.

i merical arrangernents of Cases, Reguladons, Statutes, and Others. 'Ihese citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes may have occuned to cause changes in the number or name and/or appbcability of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of tic issuance.

l

'Ihe references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally fol-lowed by phrases that show th s.pplicsLion of the citation in the particular issuance.

These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

4. Subjnt index

' Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues arxl subjects coveted in the issuances. The subject headings me followed by phrases that give specific information about the tubjec, as discussed in the issuances -

being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

5. l'acility Index

'lhe index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the

- Issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of issuance, issuance number, and full text reference.

-,, +.

,,me r-r m

--e s

v.,.

4 _.

4,-... -..-- - --

l 1

i l

g j

CASI: NAMI: INilE%

AR!?DNA PUDlJC $1 RVICL G.1MPANY, a el.

j OPIRA11NO ljG.NSE AhDRDMIAT; MI MORANDUM AND OkDI.R 11NDING MI!Clil!L Pl.Trt10NT.R5 IN D!1AULT OAsms$al of henmtmg), lh ka Nm M 328 OL A4. 50 M9-Ol A 1, i

t

$05300!A.3 (ASLDP Na 92-0441011. 3) (Auuesta Cl.aure Imeria for Shadon Ct.oleg l

Valm); thP 92-3,3$ NRC l(U 0992) klQUL11 IOR ACllON; DIRICIOR'S DirlslON UNDI R to C l R 6 2 2% IAdei Nm SD S24.

$3329, $0530, DD 92-i,35 NRC 133 (1992)

Cl.RT!!1I.D Till1NO IADORAlORlLS, INC.

CIVIL ILNALTY; IN!11AL DlflilON (Order imposms a Cml M,manry Ibay), lhdri ha 030-12145,0*P (AKlJAP No. 9142241 OnP) (Matenals theme No 2914150-01) OA 89 079),

1 DP 92 2, 35 NRC 20 (1992) 0.lLIAND L12CTRIC llLUMINATING COMPANY and TOILDO LD150N CTJMPANY ANTIDtU5T; ORDLR; IAdst Nts. 30440 A, 30346 A ($usteosi of Anutnet Cmaums),

/

Cf 3 92-6,13 NRC 56 (1992) g' l

G.EVLIANL) LlLC11 tlc IlLUMINA11NO (Y)MPANY, a al.

d, OPl.RA11NO IJCl!.NSE AMINDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDt R (Rulms m inimenue Pason); !>da No. 504400!A 3 (AstEP No. 91450110lA4), l.DP 92 4,35 NRC 114 (109h g3 DAYlD M MANNING 7

i 1.NIORCLAUAT AC110N, MtMORANDUM AND ORDT3 (Termmaug I a Patsuk hwerdmgh thdet Na $!4615 SC (AtlSP Na 91446 02 SC) (Sam,v Rcanor Opciat<w immae No

/

$0P-10$611) (LA 91054), ISP.92-1, 35 NRC 11 (1992) w I.NIURCI.MIAT ACDON, MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R (termmmr.g hwoMmg). Ihies No 55 8613 $C (A5113P No. 91446 02 SC) (Serms Reanas Operaun liane No 50P-10%1 1) (LA g

91054); IJ1P 92 6, 35 NRC 130 (1992) 11.%13101DTl'CilNICAL LNGINEtklNO, l.TD.

i IWl'ORCthDNF ACDON; ORDLR, Docha Na 3030s70 OM (Hypeodet Muerial imensch ClJ 92 $ 35 NRC 83 (1992)

OLOROLA POW 4R COMPANY, a al.

OPiRA11NO IJCl.N5E AMLNDMENT; h1MORANDUM AND ORDLR, Dedet Nos 50424 OIA, 50425-Ol A; C11-92 3, 35 NRC 61 (1992)

JOSE A. RUII. CARID l

F INIORCDUAT ACI10N; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI k (Appnmrg 5mkmcru Agreernera and

.. '~

f Temunang theedmg), th=kst Na 030 20548 OM (A$lEP Nn 92 65A W OM) (liyptwtuo Matuial thense No. 52 2135001) (LA 91171),1 BP 92 5,35 NRC 12s 0992)

IDNO istAND IJolDING COMPANY 8

OTI. RATING l.lCI.NSE AMLNDMI.NT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R. Ihde No 50 322 Of A 3 l

(Lkerne Transfer). CLI 924,35 NkC 69 (1992)

[

IOUILIANA l.NI.ROY $f.RVICis,1 P.

"A1LRIALS IJCLNSL, MLMORANDUM AND ORDI.R. Ibaet No 70100 Mla Cl192 7,35 NHC O (1992)

I Nt* YORK IO%1.R AlfillOkr!Y l

(NIORCl. MINT ACDON, M1.MORANDUM AND ORDLR (Termmaurg I mPenth thwLngt i

Doc &ct No. SG333-OM (A$l.flP Nn 91435 02 OM) (l'eahty ()peraurg 1.aeme No hPR-39) (L A j

910m ISP-92-1,35 NRC 11 (19921 1

)

i i

i

?

i l

e

i

.,~.- -

_. _... ~.

.. __ ~ ~... ~...,-

. -... -.- - ~ ~....

_aw._.,~.-

-(

'\\

. CASI: NAMl: INI)i:X i

l 01IlO 1.DliON (UMPANY t

ANT!TRU57; ORDfR; Dais 4 Nie. $o440 A, $0.WA (Lepensuei of Anutrist rondami),

QJ 924,3$ NRC b6 (1992) 1ACK,uGNTO MUNIGPAL trillitY D151RICT OPLAATINO WCENSE AMINDMIAT; MLMORANDUM AND ORDLR, twes Nw M312 OlA (hssesakeOnly Ucensch C11-92 2,31 Mtc 47 (1992) 8AllTY UGITT CORPORATION, a al MODIllCAT10N OF ORDLR, ORDLR (Ruleg <m 1Aamees' Maxm to Cmpel (Apace thaawery from the NRC sat), IMm Nos. 0D05980. 0405961,4f3005982. 030-osDS,0208444 (AsulP Nos. 89 $90 01OM. 90.$95 010M 2),1RP 92-3A. 35 NRC 110 (1992)

TYXA517I111110$ 12fA.TRIC COMPANY OPIAATINO UQWSE AND CONSTRICIlON PLRMIT AMLNDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR;Iwm Nm 504:3OIACPA, Sus &OL; QJ 92-1. 33 bW t (1997) i n

b 5

s l :

2 I:

l L

~

l

~ ~. -

.L.....

v-=-

, - -. ~,,,,....,,,

. - ~ - - -

l l

l i

I I

1 i

i I

i l

P I

)

1 i

i I

l I

DIGES'IS l

IMt'ANCI:3 OF 181t' NL'OLIAk REGt lAlukY Ont\\llulON i

I I

1 i

l C1J 921 TLXA5 (fil!It'!!J IRC'lldC MtPANY (Curt.anche fiaa 5tc.am I.lectnc Stedm. Umts I and 1

2), Dmies Nta. $044$otACPA, 3044601 OPERA 11NO IJCLNSE, len ary 17,1992, MLMORAN.

4 f

, DUM AND ORDl'it i

A he Canmission desues a mtsaan to eagen the ranid because i%uonr.ra nre run peruse us the f

gmendmg, and their mrsaq9 dad fut address the fue factors nuessary fur late intervevemn Lven al they k

-j hed addreseed and sausfied the laie truervenum standards, Owy f aued :Ar 56*e meeung mquirements y

H INtiuoners are turred inun secArg a rergerung of the runnt hasues they wers run parues to the

~

E perneedmg staelf.

C 1%unners have crver bem perucs to the Cananche Prat pmcordmg. at ths ume they may erly

(

teomw petues by thng a fesium for ime sntervenom under 10 CT R. 6 27'tagl) and sausfamurdy p

addremains the five factas cansmed thesun. linless and und! f%:ir-se peutsun for, and are gremed, intervenuun is ou prensedag, they canrun enove to scopen em se %e.

c; D

Decause 49 NRC has not ps assued the bcase for Una 2, there temsms m sautance an ryerateg i

0 l

bcame *peweedma" that was im6sted for Comanche 1%4k by the 1979 fedesal Register nauce.

F h

7

+

E he psmon Lefme us cleady does nca satafy NRC requirwnents fur cmsiderauon of a lue41ed

[

n peuuen fw leave to intervene. Qtsta aunply. Pehnuncts have n.s enn addressed the C,e isours em"ined C)

La 10 CFA 11714(sXI)(iHv).

F~

F Even if Petiuuners emld satasfy the requiremras for law ima venum, their pnman peuuan clearly L

fade to satisfy the seguircrneras of bactum 2.734 far rsetening Die reced.

2 O

Recause the bconse foe Canarwho Ivak Unit I has aler.ady tasued,Ibuumers may sed enfortanent eune undw seaum 2.2(6. Thsveform, the plendmg is refered to Bosff far etweidereuon usuler satim 2 2M F'

inermuch as t% p)eadma relaws to Urut 1, CtJ-92-2 SACRAMTNIO MUNICIPAL LT!11ITY DISTRICI' (Rancho Seco Nudoar Gencruurig Statnel thlet No. 50312'OIA (Pivazzaiononly License), OPLRATING !K1W5E AMLN1311XI; l'ebruary c

l 6,199L MEMORANDUM AND ORDIR

[

A ne Commmum considers uw Lnviavvnental Conservaum Organuatmn's app 41 of a (kensu g

/, a Board order that derued dw nrgenstmn's pution for kave to intervene m a prnecedmg involving an

' [

anendman that, if granted, would sanvert use Rando Seco operaung beenw amo a "puseessum (mly" 3

lace.tme C.iOL). The Cteriwsum fmda that the Pet u<mer has faticd, < n appe41. to demmurate pian it has Mandmg to uncreme tre the proceed 4rg lhe Cannusum thetsfore duau the $taff, after u nukes the findmgs necessary for the ksuance of a bcerme amendmern, to issu6 the F3L subjed to a t*& stage admitustrauwe stay to allow cederly processmg,d anucipsicd judinal cha?cngos to the schon.

B he Canmission regulaums in 10 Cf.R 6 2162 apply only to appede fnem *uuual densions,

la, decasmns of a beensuas tward that depree of a majnr porunn of, or ctmlade, the prweeding before that txurd, such as a duisim to grant, suspend, revde, or amend a Inycae.

C he Cannusson's regala6ans in section 2.714a allow for en immed.ste appeal from davans granung andAw denying s whole e peution for leave to uucrvana.

D Sa-uon 2 7844 cmtama a cunpletely ddierent geniamn for appeal than aroum 2.762. Escu<a 2 '62(b) pmvides that the bnef b suppon of the artn's of a; teal may be fJed widun 30 days of the retxe

{

cf appeal. Sectavi 2.714a requas the appellant's hncf in be sohmined wnh Die nouce d appeal, wahm 10 days of the lacrumg Board's d<ucart l

l l

3 3

5 9

d a

h

lilGl315 twl:Avi 5 of 1HF hirt1 Au klG11.Alosty nnlululoN h

When o.a Omvmaann a&qued ID C i R. 6 2 714a. at tiserngssted less stemgan regaamans fur toefs faed under sattem 2.714a te ause one kncia nast be fded in a trunter Live Isame et,J - ptownably

- *da addas sawh nameer issues than en appealinen Se feel denam d an enurs Ltwoma smas l'

% Ale piert is a drar beneht to the rewswir:g MJy in havt y the esa.atance d the istsas spenfsed in 10 CD. 6 2 762 - sah as a Table of Cmisras and a table d casee. in die bnel advnmad, dw Cammesim doce sus find dist those items are regimd utidar its ruir Priur Cisnmension case las reymres that all bnefs - incl #1mg Guna fded under 10 C F A 6 2.714a

- shall cassin s *swrment d Ois case" or "suteniait of facts" u.dadv g "an m ttm d that pmmm d the rmedatal batory 4.f 9.e same tsinned to the taws ur issuer presented tiy 14. appeal." Pu%c Servate Ce d Cnta6ma (Bisi los Staumt,1.4ta 1 and 21. A!All 385, $ NHC Gao,6110977) llo* c= er, 04 Omnasum can enemse its demeum and esws that mprnnes an tuamm 11 All parues who appear tirJnre the Camnauon

bear full roponsakiny for any rnisappretensam d [theul psainn caused by he 3%dequence d lther] loci.

W6scimsin ilecuw power Co. (l%d lleadi Natrer Mara, Unna I stw 21. ALA!!4M, l$ NHC 277,275 0 942)

NRC regulaunns puvede tast "lainy pawm shine unscat may be afleued by a petacedmg arid who deares to partmpaw sa a priy to ldwj proceedag" shouW ide a peutum to unervene sentmg forth that interest and the "puniible enert d any ards Otat may be cinered in the proceedmg am the peutumer a bacrest" 10 CJ R 61714(a) and (d)

J The NRC has " leg held that judiaal samtspts of eiandmg mill be apl. Led be determrtmg abedia a peauonar has suff>uant truerest la a pasa4mg to be antitled k, irnervene as e matter of r$ s unde 5

escuan 189 of the Aumic imagy Ad." Metngwla n llam Co. (Thres %le Island Nuclear Suum, Vaut il Clj 8123,18 NRC 3D,332 (1983)-

K De NRC has hdd that, in order so sataafy "pulwtal'* atandmg. a peutmer must demmsuete that si cmid sune-en actual" injury in fan" as a cos=luern of de (mendes and that Ota iniaws: is widun ths

ane of intuesta" to be prtanded by the rtatute under whut the retsumer suis to intervere. Soe, e s,

Matmp. Anon I Ason Co (Three Mile Island Nudcar stauun. Unn.). GJ 8$ 2,21 NRC 2A2,316 0vas)

L lt la true that NLPA dues puert same screusme interwu, lwweve. u aMy petnacts agamst th<ies injunos that resuh frien avvtrtwimental darnage.

M A prattmcr's nued d employmen dw resulta dtrudy frum o bocnace's dans.un att.o operats e inwisar facilny and that does rum.

't ht envirormanal damage, does not fall within the *aane d smemia" prtaded by NI_PA and cannte eagpurt. p l' act's standmg to challengs the ageruy's set.un.

N here in Canurtisaire pece.lant its rejasing an assertan d "inftrirstmal hveresta" as smewis for standing IAw L, terr ~armal Cu (Ages for the Omernmers diruba am Appbcsuon to Laput Special Nurtear Mairial), CU46,3 NRC $63, $72 0974 0

Inwseet" means an intent affened by the outawns of the pmceedmg. at an interest a de pactedes.

P A petiunnee senkmg to antervena centmi denamstists standmg atmply by assuung a has of informatum if it is run alloesd to perucipate in a pnwedmg Q

he NRC's stay pmcedwis agly mly oben theie as an order in easatence ki he stayed. If there is no ordes in saistetus to be stayed, the proper swtuut is a motLe w hoid in abeyerne.

Cl2 92-3 UIDRGIA NWER COMPANY. es si (%$tle I:lactnc Ocnersimg Plant. Uruts 1 and 2),

Dmiet Nm $N2&OI A. 5M25-OLA; Ol1 RATING ljCLNSL AMLNTAt1NT, I ebniary 12, 1992, MLMORANDUM AND ORDI.R A

he Comnussen cmaiders ths 5%utimer's ameal uf a btensmg board dedamn essmasms us cirnentions and daying ha peuuun to unmene on arn,m4mmu to opcianns 1. cense miuvements pertaes to anugency dicael generators The Cummassam disnusaea de appal fur the Psi.umer's failm to file a bnci supportog ha appeal, however, certata todmal basuca reined to ogsrauon of the diesel genciattes ses refarwd to the NRC Staff for further miaw 11 Perucipanta in NRC procadega, whcowr utAP% fN sC (W refMmlfd by Mosel, m elpeded to lame f amihan with dw amirahic rules of par Aicet C

Arprals fmn a ho:rweg teard order having the effect d d.mussms all d a pn:spave party's usucuviors and decying interventmn be under 10 C1 R. 6 2 7144 4

~ -. - -.-.. -

- ~ ~..

~= ~

- - -,. ~ ~. - -., - -

DIGl:STS lut%MTA Ol'iltr Mrli AR )(ImillA10RY CO%%%llMION D

The taeasity J e bnsf supputma as sppsal ha krg ken omte.nued tu de NKC's afteU858 puste, enere secomuun of a pany's price redunn in the proeredmg and its gerwat dossusfaaim with the cutccame of the pmeeding is ne substitute tw a bnet that idanuais ard eaplains the airws of de hemising bard in su adas telow.

li If a bcamang luerd bebeves fitan Iw inwdvernas in a pnatedmg dat seruses ufay asssas remam to be addramed, kt circurestatus so who the semairsg knarvenur las been dommed, the tuned may refer any outa',an&ng smeerns to the NRC $nai for appupnate acuan F

If an adjudicaury pecceedmg is termmated, stw Corremann enas refer rar,smang safety issues a pannual rimeern to the NRC Staff for review pursuarn se o e Ctentenaswe's general sapersteory suth4miiy

- and respeaitahty for safeiy manors.

CU924 IDNQ 151.AND UGifflNO COMPANY ($taweham Najear Powet $utwen Urut I), thist a

Na W322 OLA3 (Ucense TiensterJ. Ol1 RATING UCIW$li AMINDMENT; February 26, 1992, MLMORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Ctenmissica euncludes that the propmed hanna transfer is nas an

amendment" u that term is normally construed hut e *% cense uansler." whid is a separtie and &stswt saim under os Aiornic lawrgy Act. Iltmover, the AEA does sua requus e poeflecuvencas er *pur" hearms la a twense unnsfer.

In additirm, the 04:nmissian deierminas that a pe afiscoveness discrisimary lu.areng is tua am+priais under the fans of this casa, Finally, the Camnussion domes Peuteners' requests (1) to bold Oua actxe in abeyance perufmg re<dutum af the questum d UPA's eusunse under New York state lae and (2) for en adndnistrative or'touacheepng" stay prmdma juecial chatlt,nge lherefore, when the 5tsif has seresimeJ On transfer as de Cauteniasian dancts here4n to sisure em de resuhe d any pot-efferuvsJest heanng will nts he peju& sed, the Staff may appove the imme&ately effecuve transfer of om braham bcense frun utro to UPA.

B A

transfer d bconse" catuua be acccenphahed sidcJy by an omendnra io an aperstang reactor

' breme.

C A "vanafar of award" mvsase ady the hearing nghia afforded by the 6:st sentence of sectirm 189a(11 %e AEA dose not mquus alw offer d a pnor haanns a sa applicaaan so vawfet coeurul of a twerus before the transfet la made effectiva.

D Uiven the lunhed scate of e.aivmes that 11PA sen undertake roll a rubng an Ow decanumasiones plan, tu Ability to crema de plara fesn twah a :egal and a pecucal standemnt,04 avduced hatard fwa a plans that opassed only atlow power for a ahmt time, and the evident availabilsy of quahfied pt"emnel

. te snaintaut the plant in the inimm, the C;nunissim fmde that the transfer does not rame any p6ac heahh araf safety indues that womnt e svia hearing as a maust af Ascreuan.

,B When an action is sdam subject to a post.effecawness hearing, the e..uce arma b canauannd on

. savatsg to ha previus cauliihe if the beantig does not raufy the actaan taken. lr Oda case, ths Staff sbid ceadaloo de transfer of om IVL (1) on the luense's severung to utf0 0 UPA ceases to ea'si i

or otherwise is fotand to be inquahfind to Imtd the boerue and (2) on 111C0', ptwi&rg ceni6canan to de NRC Staff that it will retain and maintain adequata capshikey and quahft suona tuaka ewr the hcena, peptly in the eyes that elder of these situatwns oscurs, f

Once a transfer is Imakred through the post sifortiveness he mg pocasa, thve samsir,a the need

- for administratin purposes - to have the bnse clenged as evitat uw ning of dw new bconsee.

Sash as amendman, wbxh presumas an effutive transfer, pear.na no safety quessons and charly involves na sigesAcars batards considerations.

O Padtumers requat that dus scunn be held in abq ence unut the resohr.iun of the ques 6an of UPA's exasie xe under New York stata law. Osven the sewrai m of the bcenas bed to ULCO rnandated hers under

=

t l

thosc t-ircurnstances, and the fut that 1%tumso did rmit imme&stely fue auch an sairat in state ecun, so owne is rw indirstart fmm the stats court dist there cwid to some ment in penuoner's arguman, the Cman'sainn den;os 1%tioners' request 11,

Penunnen aquest that the conenisman ney the transfer's effseuvenese pen &og their espeaed

= danenge in the Can of Arpsala.11.s DC Circuit has observed " mat anNnals may poperty stay their own orders when they have ruled cri adminedly shfficult legal quasu ms,,,.* Washinginn Meinpuen Area Tranut Consrussion v. Ilohday Temus,lic.,559 F.2d I 41, E44 (DC Cir.1977). De Csunmission &=w E

l

+

5 i

l

[

i

_,~.~

DIGESTS 1%UANCE.5 OF 'IllE NL' CIT AR RI Gl'IAIOkY CO%l\\ll%)ON run perceae a difficuh legal q4estmn here, par 6cularly in view of the Carumaca 's price a wr[nutmn and the deference custornardy accorded an agency's interpretatnon r4 ha or amc starute.

I Prunmers fail to convma the Commissum that they n!! suffer any arreparable Wry should a de.y the stay. LlPA cannot do anydung under uds hcerse that LILCO could rua da lie A Os S.he'd thstnet and f J1.00 may have senma aconmic riierais at nak. De couna t ce had c> nsistently that enere ocsammic losa docs wt ceratinne irnparable injury. It is the Cman sum's inian n, avo64 makeg decisms based annely m etunamic usanms. hus, the balance d equi 6es in this matu does not nih in Peutkaicss' favor, and the Cmumsnmn denies 1%:inmers' ralues f<s a stay pendmg appod.

ClJ 92-5 FEWLIL OLOECl!NICAL LNGINE111NO, LTD. (Duunas E. Munty, Rads gra;ter), Ikdet Na 3430870 OM (BypWuct Material 1.ktrack ENIORCEMINf ACflON, h' arch 5 1992, ORDLR A

he Comnussim vacates on the grounds of moomens the Atanic Safq and Uwrams Board's Inius! Decision (LEP-9129) which modded an cader issued oy 2a NY Staff to Ie* ell Omneduncal Engmeenna, L2d. S:.aff's original order modded Fswell Gertadmica: Layincedng,IM 'a twense by bamng Mr. Thcenas F. Murray from working as a radmgral er under the bcense for a reno 6 of 3 years.

t B

Decishms belt'r will normally be vacated when pnar to the outcane of Jre a; pellate process.

Quuugh happenstance., the proceed ng becanes exxa. See Unimi Staten v. Munabswear, Inc.,340 U.S.

36,3%J (1950h Cmsumers Ibwer Co. (Pahsades Nuclear Power Facihtyk ClJ 82-18,16 NRC 50,51 (1982)

C1J 92 6 0100 EDISON COMPANY (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Umt 1) and Cl LVFLAND E11ClRIC ILLUMINATINO COMPANY and Toll.DO LDISON COMPANY (Perry Nudrar Power Plant, Unit 1, Davia.Benne Naclear Pu.er Suuon, Una 1), Docket Nos. 504:0 A, M346 A (Suspension of Anuuust Coruhtionsh ANTTTRUST; Manh 5,1991 ORDIA A

The Cununission deruca Agylicants' motwn for seconsidert uon of CL191-15, 34 NRC 269 (1991), in wtdch the Comnussion sua spmte caucised its inhams supervuon power over an adjud6cnory proceeding ini6ated by Appbcanu' acquest for amendmems that would rurus censin antiuust beense sedidans pertainmg to ihe Perry and Davis-Besas nuclear plaru. CLI-91,15 duected the Atmuc Safety and Ilcmsing Board to suspend considennon of all matters, except for two issues referred to as the "balaxk" legal issues.

B la seceral, the NRC Staff is only one pany to a Canmission adphcatory pnweedmg. De Staff does not occupy a favored pait,m and its presenta6orm are subsect to the same scrutmy as exwe of other parues. Sea Consobdaicd Edison Co. of New York (Indian Pumt, Units 1,2, and 3), AIAB 3N,3 NRC 1, 6 (1976X Southern Cahforma EAsm Co (San Onufre Nuclear Generatmg Suuan, Unna 2 and 3), AIAB-268,1 NRC 383,399 (1975). On some ques 6cos, sudi as interpreta6on of statusca or judicial decaims, the Suff's suturissions have no more weight than those of any other pany Pubbs Semce Ca of New 30 llampshise (Seabronk S'.auan, Units 1 and 2), Clj.76-17,4 NRC 451,462 (1976).

C When a case turns on a questim af f e, the licensmg Board and the Commusim, m restew, am capable of comcung party bias by pre %hng independen deciswes. In addason, a pany dasatisfied wnh the <s tcane of a fmal Canmissica derW can seek review from an a;pnyristo court, wluch is fully capshle of cormeung hias when a u to. as a qucauai af law. Gulf Otl Corp. v. TPC,563 F.2d 588, 612 (3d Cir.1977), cent, denied,434 U.S.1062 (1978).

Ctj 92-7 IDUlstANA ENERGY SERVICES, Lit (Claiborne Enruhnent Center). IMet Na 743074 kb MATERIAIS (JCENSIL Ntuch 5,1992; MEMORANDUM A.'O ORDER g

A The Comm:nm %ades issues before a relating to its hming eder that set fonh standania by which due appbcauon fw e iicuse tr construct and operste a uranhn enridwen' facihty would be judgd Both the Appne.ua and the sole Intervonor in the pmcarding sou#v u unsikrat'on of vanous puuons of tac heariog order. The Commissire <lanfa that the existis; 10 C'LR Pan 140 he applied to te hcanc appbcauon so4ely as guidance. i se C rumission orders that the int Comnusnan tale on matenal emmd and aesantmg for ennehmem facihdes, instead of the proposed tula, shall be oghed to this pnweeding; Om the heanns sha!! proceal as dacted in the order, and that a, other requssis for reemmocratters are hn B

Cmgus dtcuted that the Pnce Anderwn Act hab&y unurance wurcir mts will n a be appbed in vra-lum rnnchman facihties See Atmue Ewy Act,i193(sA 6

l~

1 l

DIGESTS ISSUANCF.S OF Til6: MTlf.AR l'FGUl.AlukY CO\\l%11%1d%

C Of the exisdng NRC reguleims uidcr 10 Cf k. Pat 140. crJy acctwns 140 15-1 6 17 and Put 140, Appendia A are ambcabic to tyus pmceedmg. and thes only as guidese to mies as in prm4 ref haMhty insurance.

D An intervenar's objame to the use d the word "recmsideratwn' m a heavg order that relates to Comerdsska umsidina6an of the hearms suadards raises s.ddy a smiantic problen, n lies as the cates of the reconsiderate offered by the Cmunisamn is eda icnt

mea the imervenor's ubguons and the Commission's obliganons.

li When standards set fixTh in a hurms order to ge=v.a an adjudscatum nest not been estabb4hed by rulemakite the Commission may prmide an gyonumry for perues to chaueree the standards by sedms sec<xmideration.

I' he sums of an unciullenged heanns sunda d wmid mm be sar

.n snponed standard, w

card an unchallenged standard would be, wahout more, fu'Jy appbcable to the T nw O

li should be evident fnun the terms of a heanns order the,

mg mher thras that peunens f<r seconsideranon "must contain all s M

=cr argumeru e yn the pction/" that the Commission intends to tratiate a piocas ist which ui. obpia. would he faDy cmsidend de nmo and the perues puided wah the Canmassion's merced deaum 11 IW purposes of sinns and design d a uraruum ennchment facthty agamst accidenul atmos @ene seleases of uranium hema!!aonde, the Centruuion esublished plant tmundery hmas that were intended to te geneseDy apdvalent to the C4snmissmn's ruaor seng entena found in 10 Cf R. Part 10i1 1

The Corm.isem's obaccuve in applyms the Part 100 siung entena to a uramum enrichm<r.t f

,y, na equivalenry to Put 100; 6 was never the iment m act levels below wtuch no adverse effecu wruld occur from hydrogen floande.

J De Cunrmssion ch<me the appruadi of performance based des 4gn standarda for the contempleed ennchment facilay. hose s andards esubhshrd "pnncipal design cntens whwh are cunmensurate wuh their safety funcnors' 53 l'ed Reg. at 13218 K

The Comimssmn's design entena for the contempWed enndnent factlay d.d not melude a performance-hssed safeguants standard daceted as comrnm d4cnse and secunty L

he need for safeguards against unauthon:ed acuvaies at uranium muichment fac6ues was addressed pnmar0y through cation ed a new sectam 74.33 m NVC's ensung matenal car. trol and accosmung segulang M

he new secnon 74,33 of 10 Cf.R. Includes es a performance-based requiren au that each uramum auichmans beensee unust estabbsh,impka% and mahnam an hic apprmed material contrut and accounnng systan.

N Spectfw tr+1rtmenta for the use t.f phpmal securuy meas 4res in achsevvig maanal cenurnt and scmunung objecuves is unnoccasairy; physa:al scanty measures may be inc uled m an apphcant's program, 6

but the aglicant is free to devehy us program b any manner as kog as it meets the general performance i+3cenves b

7

m.

-.m_ _._ _._ __. _.. _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..

l e

l l

i-I i

i i

DIGESTS i

l ISSUANCI'.S OF Tile A10MIC 54 TTY AND 1.ICI NSING DOARDS y

W l

l 4

LEP 92-1 NEW YORK PO41R AlfillCRITY (James A. liuPatrak Naclear Power Plant),Ibact Na 50-j 333-OH (ASulP Nc 91.M5 02-OM)(l'acihty Operaung leense Na DPR 59) (LA 91.053) and DAVID C

l M. MANNING (Scruor Reactar Operator) Duches Na 55 M15-SC (AstilP Na 91.M402 SC) (Senior Rmtor Opentor tiense No. SOP 10561-1) (EA 91054), thTORCLMINT ACflON, January 21,1992, g

i MI'MORANDUM AND ORDER (ferminaung huPatnd Proceeeng)

~

ISP-92-2 CIEMED TESTING 1ADORATORIES, INC., Dmics No. c.14121450vP (ASLUP Na 91-j f

622-OlCvP) (Maiorista Ucenu Na 29-1415401) (IA 39 079); CIVIL PFNALTY; January 29/1992, 7

INfflAL DECISION (Omer imposing a Ci=0 Monetary Penaliy)

/.

A The Ucmains Board,in an Initial Decuim, determirus that a civd mmeury penalty sought to be C

i impcued by the NRC Staff against a Ucenses involved in industnal raangraphy shou!J be reduced from 2

58000 to $5000. De floard ruled that various repons and statements by the Ucenice were nct ' tenumally C.

falt.e, as claimed by the sus but that'he thensee's systern of m ords was mappropnaie and madequate for

/,

car. plying with tha recordkeepuig m;uimnents of the license, As a result, the lhard reduced the ornaliy from Severity 1svut Il to Sevauy Level 111.

[ Y H

Accurate repma are maienal to the NRC's licensing schans for industnal raeography. Inaccurate v:

7 l

reports are thus matenal whe6er er amt the NRC wuld be i d to take actsm on the hans of the errmeous f

e informaturt.

D C

in revia *ing a cml penalty sought to he assened by the Staff, a licenung bosrd may descrmme b

Y whesher the pnipsed seventy isvol and penahy are asyrupriate tv, ahernauwely, whethes the piacec4hng 2

I should be Asmissed or the penalty impmed, miugated, rw terrut:4d. A board may not increaw the penahy sought by the Staff.

D Because d the dernmstrated potential dangers of radmgnphic geranons to the phlg heahh and g

safety and the importance d audit repons to MRC's system of regulatim, a fadure to prepare correct reports i

r can be of safety sigmacanca In this case, the preparatum of inaccurata sudts reporta some time after ths L

C audit had taken place war inapsvopriate for complying with the beense ra;uirement and amounted to e hreakdown in cumtrui of bcensed activiues.

(

E The pmmpiness and esient no which a bcamee takes corrective acurm is a fact.w that a beensu g y

board may consider in determuung the amount of a civil peneliy.

7 F

'ihe folkwing techrJeal insae h escussed: Imtusinal redirigraphy.

7 1.DP-92-3 AR170NA PUBUC SERYlCE COMPANY, et al. (Pala Wnle Nuclear Ocnerstmg Suuon Umin f

e I,2, and 3), Dixkcs Nos 50 52s-OLA 3,54529 OIA 3,30 5%-OlA3 (ASIIlP Na 92-654 01-OLA.

I 3)(3 utomaus Chwurs Imeriodt for Shutalown Coolmg Valves) OPLRAT(NG IJCIASE AMENDMINf; r

i Marr5 4,1992, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IlNDING MITCllLil PETITIONERS IN DITAULT

[

(Dismianal of Pro. suig) 6 A

The Ainnac Energy Act doca nor confer the automauc right of intenenuon upm anyone, The Commissim snay con &Lon the caen:ise d that nght upm the mceung a reasonable procedural requirements 11 Pnor to the first prehea ing cmfertwa, the peuuncer must file a supplement la his c,r her peution j

to intervens which sets fonh the contentions the peuunner accia to have ht> gated anJ the basis for each contentsm.10 CFA I 2314.

C Pursuant to 10 CFA 12J07. the Licensing Board is empowesed, on the fadure of a pany in cianply wius any prrJicanng coruererwe order, to make auch orders in regard to the fadure as are just.

'a 1

i 9

J i

1-4 l

a 4

?

DIG"STS isSU ANCES OF lilE ATOMIC SMTTY AND 1.lCLNstNG 1104kDs D

[hanussal of a party is the uluraats sancum appbcable to an antervena Lhere a pany fails to carry out the respmsibihues arnposal by the fact of sta perucapsum ut the pruccedmg sah a pany may ke found to be in default and the Ucensing Board may make sud orders in regsrd to Ose failura as are just 10 CJ.R. H 1707. 2.71s.

ISP42 3A S AfW/ UGiff CORPORATION, et al. (Blomishurg San Decmtammatim), Dm ket Nw. 034 05980, 03405951. 03405982, 030 01335, 030 08444 (A5UIP Nos. n9 540-01.OM, 40095-01-OM 2);

MOD 01CA110N OF ORCIR; March its 1992; ORDER (Ral.ng rut lica secs

Maum to Canpel Depstum Discwery fnwn the NRC Staff) lEP-92-4 CLEVILAND EULTIUC IULMINATING COMPANY, es d (Perry Nuclear Power I%t, Umi 1), Doda No. 50 P.GOLA-3 (ASISP No. 9145413-OlA3h OP!RATINO UCENSE AMENInt1Nf; March it,1992; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Rahng on latcrvenum ItG6m)

A la this Memorandum and Order, the licenseg Board f3nda that the peuunners lad standirt to imervene in this operating bcense ammanent pmceedmg and, therefore, it danes the peudmt.,

intervenim peitut B

The Commission long ago held that *contenporsueous judwial wneepta of strndes" are to be used in deternuning whether a pounoner has alleged a sufficiers "tracrest" widun ths ancanmg d secum 189(a) d the Ausnic l'nergy Act and the ageney's regulauons to intervene sa a matter d right in an NRC bcensmg proceedmg. Pwsland General Electric Co (l%ble Sprms Natear Iht, Uruts I and 2), CU427,4 NRC 614 61314 (1976).

C To estalGh standmg, a petiuaner snust demmatrate an anmry at fact from the acuan involved and an interest arguably with.n the zone of interesta protecte. by the statutory pr=-sions governmg the procceang. See iTorida Power & LigM Co. (St Imer Nuclear Power Plant, Uruts I vnd 2) CU 89 21,30 NRC 325,329 (1959); Metmpobtsa i hson CA (three MJe IJand Nuclear Stauan, Urut 1), CU 83-25, 18 NRC 327,332 (1913).

D The same in injary in fact and zone of imeicst requirements must t e vnet regardless of whether the peuuoner is an inavidual or an orgamsetwas necking to intervene in its own right Monda Power & light Co. (Tudey Point Nuclear Geocraung Plan ( Umta 3 and 4), AIAB 952,33 NRC 521,529 (1991).

E When an organization secks to intervene as the authonzed represent 46ve of one of its manbers, the standing of the organizatimal peuuoner is, inter ansa, dependcra upaa that inavutual member havmg standing in his own naht. Tsidey Point,33 NRC at 530L3 L $es also llura v. Washingtm Apple Advernamg Comm'n,432 UA 333,342-43 (1977).

F Currert bdicial standmg dwtnne holds that the injury in fact mluuement has three mnpmmis:

inpry, cause, and temedal benefit See Valley firge Chris6an Colless v. Amencaca United for Separauan of Omrch and State, M4 U.S. 4M,472 (1952).

O To meet the injury in fact trat in pmceedmgs caSer than emas for consuucum permits arat mersung licenses, injury to individuala hving in reanos,sbte pruaimity to s plant must be based upon a showing of "a clear poteraial for olhite cmacquencas* resultma fasu the challa3ged acum. SL tucts 30 NRC et 329.

11 Standmg canrmt be properly predicaica upon the denial of a purposed pra.edural nght that is unecupied from any irmry caused by the substance of the challenged bcensa amendment. See United y

3 Transp. Uruon v. ICC,691 F.2d 908,918 (D.C. Cir.1989), cert. denied,110 S. CL 327109901 lEP-92 5 JOSE A. RUIZ CARID, Dwket No. 030 20541-OM (A5LHP Na 92-658-04-OM) (Dyproduct Mater's) I seense No. 52 21350-01)(EA 91171); ENFORCEMENT ACf10N, Man:h 24,1992; MEMO-

~

RANDUM AND ORDER (Approvmg Scaticment Agreemos and Terminaung Proceedeg)

LBP-92-6 DAVID M. MANNING (Senior Reacts Operstar), Docket Na 55 8615-5C (AstEP No 91416 02 SL) (Senior Reactor Operator Ucense Na SCP-105611) (EA 91054); ENIORCEMENT ACDON; Harch 31,1992, MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Terminaung Proceedmg) 10

.._.~..---._ - -. _ -...-

l l

i-f i

6 l.

l j

I i

DIGESTS ISSUANCE OF DIRECTOR's DECislOM

~

l DD 92-1 AR1/ONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, et al. (Palo Verde % clear Cencraung Staum, Umts I, l

2, and 3), Dales Nos.2528,4529,2530; REQLT3T 1:OR ACTION, March 16,1992,DIRIrl'OR'S DECISION UNDER 10 Cf.R.12.206 A

he Director of the Ofhes of Nrclear Reactor Regulauon dena a peutim f.leJ by Meso lhd

/

3 K. Colapinto and Stephen M. Kohn, ratuesting actim with regard to the.Tlo Verce Nuckn Cuneraung Stati n Units 1,2, and 3. Speci6caDy, the Peuum alleged that: a hydrogen Ic4k an the main generai.n of Lait 2 could pae a fire hazard,6te pumps at the plant have malfuncumed and sanrms pump water in the event of a Ere; the coubng sowers are crumblang and are unsafe; the piant has been operatmg outside of g

safety regulanons under "putinedons for cmunued operatim*; the lxeruce has not idenuned the electrical E

circuit breakers for 6rs protocuan such that,in the ennt of a 61e,it would nna know what equipnent smid be damaged; it is rumored that Uril 2 bes a pnmary*acemdary leak of 2 gallons par minute; the Licensee has g

willfully rperated Palo Verde Nucicar Generating Stauon in violation of un'reaA*d 1*censms ruguuements I

and willfuny failed to reptzt unspeci6ed safety violanons to the NRC through licensee evert upons; the

/

3 Licence has never noved the pmtalle hydrogen mumbiner fann me urut to another, has no praedure to p

do so, au he no o.Jup rectwnhiner; the tjceruce failed to entrectly imphunant a design change for the z

r reactor control elcrnent drive mechanisms on Unit 3, the Lleensee has er. gaged in widespread harassment W

3 and retaliation against employces who rusa safety concer s he Pisiumen reques emergecy adim to k

i shut down Palo Vente Umts 1,2, and 1, and that the NRC appomt a special invcaugative team to momtre Q -

and inspect conditims at the plant.

5 V

~.

w J

t a

k i

e

,)

8 11 4

a k

)

l u.~

.. ~

- _. - -- -.. ~ _. -. - -. - -. - - -

l I

l l

l I

l l-i l

l T

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX l

CASES l

l Allen v. Wrighs,468 U.S. 737,759 n.24 (1954) redressabahty analysis for injury in fact where reque.sted schef in cessade of putacly illegal cmduct; 12P-92A 35 NRC 121 (1992)

(

Amoeistion of Data Pnxessing Serv. Orgs. v. Camp,397 U.S.19,1%I (1970) enmpmenta d injury in fact; LBP-924, 35 NRC 120 (1992) hbtntt v, United Farm Wakers Nat'l Union,442 U.S. 289,298 (1979',

showmg necessary to demonstrata injury in fact; tilP-92 4, 35 NRC 121 (1992; i

l 11Pt v. AEC, 502 F.2d 424, 428 (D.C. Cir.1974) scope of huervenuon nghis under Atanic Energy Act; ILP-92-4,35 NRC 124 (1992)

X Capital Issal Fundauon v. Commodity Credit Cap., 711 F.2d 253, 255-57, 259 60 (D C. m 1983)

-[

nexus principle for stamhng in prr %ral injury cama, I HP-92 4, 35 NRC 124-25 (1992) 7 j

l City of 12e Angeles v. NifTSA,912 F2d 478,495-98 (D C. C2r.1991) 4 l

interference with an organizauods informauonal purpmm as hans for stand.a to mtenene, r.n l

CLI-92 2,35 NRC 59 (1992) 7., 3 O

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), AIAD-841, 24 NRC 64, 69 (1986) b content d appellate briefs; CU-92 3, 31 NRC (7 (Ib2)

[

U Compet;tive Emerprise Institute t. National IInghway Traffie Safety Adnun stranon, 901 F.2d Itn (D.C.

{

e l

Ctr.1990) irnerference with an aganization's.nformanonal purpmes as basis for standmg to intervene,

.j CL192-2,35 NRC 39 (1992) g, Consolidated Edisen Co 4 New Ymt (Indian Pomt, Umts I, 2, and 3), AIAB-341, 3 NRC 1, 6 (1976) w weight given to Staff evid<sico in adjndicatorv pmceedegs, ClJ 32 6, 35 N5Y' V8,91 (1992)

J C,nsolidated E6aan Cn. of New York (Indian Pant, Units 1, 2, and 3), ClJ-h-8, 2 NRC 173,176 (19'15) 3 standard for instituten of show cause proceedmar, DI)92-1,35 NRC 144 (1992)

Consumers Power Co. (Midland Plant, Umts 1 and 2),4 NRC 474,475 rtl (1976) pndmg judicial chaDesiges as hesis for stay of NRC pnxadmgs; ClJ 92-4,35 NRC 75 (1992)

Consumers Power Co (Pahaades Nuclear Power Facthty), C118218,16 NRC 50, 51 (1982) vacaum of c,ecisim on moaness gnends; Cll-92-5,35 NRC 84 (1992)

~

Duke fbwer Co. (Perkins Nuclear Statim, Units 1, 2, and 3), AIAB 615,12 NRC 350, 352 (luo) unfamiharit*; with pnxedaral ruler as cause for failure to fi;c arpc11 ate bnef, C1192-3,35 NRC M (1992)

Edw Interneuonal Co. (Agent for the Cecrnment of India on AppbcaUm to Empmt Special Nuclear Materull C1J 766, 3 NRC 563, 572 (1976) inferensuonal interests as a basis for standmg, C1J-92-2,35 NRC 53 (1992)

Federal Communicatims Commission v. WOKO, Inc., 329 U.S. 223, 227 (1946) matenality of inaccurate licannec repons; lllP-92 2, 33 NRC 40 (1992)

Ibrida Power and light Co. (St. tmeie Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1), Al.AB 921,30 NRC 177,186

(.

(1950) h6gshility of adaluacy of Staff review; Cil 924. Y NRC 9: n.? (1992) s f-

/

13 1

s a

F 4

-o-i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDI:X CAhl3 lhoda hwa and light Co. (St. lais Nueleat Po*% 1'lant, Umts I and 2), ClJ-89 21,30 NRC 325, 329 (1989) iryury/m-fact and none-of-uncrests tests far standeg to intervene; UlP.924, 35 NRC 120 (1992)

Tbnds Poww and Light Co. (Turkey Pe nt Nuclear Generstmg Plant Umts 3 and 4), CU-9'.5,33 NRC 238, 241 (1991) noccasily of appelle a bnafs; QJ-92 3,35 NRC 66 (1992)

Florida Powes and ught Ca (Turkey Pant Nuclear Generstmg Plant, Umts 3 and 4), CU 9113, 34 NRC 185, 188 (1991) besirs board authonsy to refer issues to Staff for reanluthm; CU-92 3,35 NRC 67 n.5 (1992)

Foundauon w leanonnic Trends v. Lyng, 943 F.2d 79 (D C Car.1991)

]

interfennce wah an orgamradon's infernanonal purpses as basis for sandmg to interiene, GJ-92-135 NRC G) (1992)

Gadsime, Reshors v. Vallage d Bellwood,441 U S. 91, 99 (1979) showing necessary to demonstrate injury in fast,1S11924,35 ST,C 121 (1992)

Gulf oil Corp. v. ITC,563 F.2d 588,612 (3d Cir.1977), cert. daued,434 U.S.1062 (1978) corranon of bias through judwial renew; CU 924, 35 NRC $9 (1992) llouston lighg and Power Ca (Aliens Creek Nu-lear Gener 6ng Stathm, Urut 1), ALAB 585,11 NRC W

469 (1980) dtidnc6ans between 10 CFJt.1714a ard 1762; ClJ 92-3,35 NRC 67 n.4 (1992) llunt v. Washington App's Adver6stng CanVn,432 U.S. 333,34243 (1977) dependence of aganizadonal standi:.g on indivulual mender's standing to intervene, ISP-92 4, 35 NRC 120 (1992) llunt v. Washington Apple Advertismg Carnm'n,432 U.S. 333,343 0977) en.ployment mierests as bans for standms; CU-92-2,35 NRC 53 (1992) llurley Medical Center (One llurley Plaza lint, Michigan), AU 87-2, 25 NRC 219, 224 (1957) authosuy of licensing boards w miugsts civil penaldea; LBP 92-2,35 NRC 42 (1992)

Jersey Cerurst Power ar.d light -

(Faind Raver Nuclear Ococritmg Staden Uma 1), AIAB 139,6 AEC 535 (1973) econnmic interests protected under NEPA: ClJ-92 2,35 NRC 56 (1992)

JohnpP, Thornburgh, 898 t'.2d 849, 851 (2d Cir.1990) ecormnuc loss as irreparable injury for purpose of dxaimng e stay 1 CU-92-4, 35 NRC 31 (1992)

Juidice v. Vail,430 U.S. 327,332 33 & a9 (1977) standeg to intervene whers alleged future injury-in-fact is spwulative U1P-924,35 NRC 123 a 44 (1992) linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 617 (1973) showing necasary to demonstrate inpry in fact; LEP-924,35 h1C 121 (1992) las Island ljghteg Ca (Jamcaport Nuclear Power station, Units 1 and 2), ALA!1-292, 2 NRC 631, MO (1975) e.qloyment interests as bans for standing to intervene; UJ-92-2, 35 NRC 57 (1992) lag Island lightmg Ca (Shortham Nuclear Powcr station, Umt 1), CU 912, 33 NRC 61,73 n.5 (1991) efNs of license transfer un decommissiming opions, CU-92-4,35 NRC 78 (1992) lag Island Ughtmg Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Satum, Umt 1), CU-914,33 NRC 233,237 (1991) admissibilay of cmtennons challengmg Staff decision not to prepare and envtrunmental impact stetement; CU-92 2,35 NRC 51 (1992) lag Island ljghting Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon. Umt 1) CLl-918,33 IAtC 461,468 (1991) sicy of issuance of hcense where there is no cutstanamg order to stay; CU 92 2,35 NRC 61 (19923 Img Island lighLing Ca (ShMtham Nuclear Power 5Ladon, Unit 1), ISP-9139, 34 NRC 273, 284 (1991) datirwtices between 10 C.FR.1714a and 2.762, CU-92 3,35 NRC 67 n.4 (1992) l<a Angeles v. Lyons,461 U.S. 95,1(T2,105 (1965) showseg neccusary u demonstrata myry in fact; LEP-924,35 NRC 121 (1992) 14 1

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX r

CAss3

- 1misiana Power and Ught Ca (Waterfani Steam 1lecinc Stadesw Unit 3), AIAB 812,22 NRC 5,55-$6

- 0 985) :

ItigaMlity of adequacy cd Staff review; CU-924 35 NRC 91 n.2 0992)

uja.1 v. Nananal Wildhts Federstam, U S.

110 S C,. 317),3185 86 0990)

Inkry-in-fact and none-de rests tau for standmg to intavene; QJ4r2-2,35 NRC 56 0992)

Wtrqwltaa Edison Ca (Dueo M,lo Islanti Nuc1 car S:a6m, Unit I), QJ 83-25,18 NRC 327,332 (1983) apstication of judicial concepia of standing in NRC prumenas; C1J 92-2,35 NRC 56 0992) inpary in-fact and scio-d4maests tesis la standag to intervene; IEP-924,35 NRC 120 (1992)

Metropolik.1 Ediaan Ca Clues bue t land Nucica: Statkut, Unit 1), Q185-/,21 NRC 282. 316 (1981) injury in-fact and sop +d-interests tema fw standmg to intavent; ClJ-92 2,35 NRC 56 0992)

MCsaippi Power and Ught Ca (Grand Outf Eclear Su6an, Unus I and 21, A1AB-140,6 ATC 575 0973) ~

necessity of appeusse twinJs: CU-92-3,35 NRC 66 0992)

O'Shea v. Uulesm,414 U.S. 488,4497 0974) standeg to internne where sueged future tryury in-fact is speculative; IEP-924, 35 NRC 123 n 44 0 992)

. Chio en rel. Ceherezze v. NdC, 812 F.2d 288, 291 (6th Or.1987) ecenamic loss as insparshle injury for purpose of chtabs a suy; CU 924,35 NRC 810992)

Pacific Oas and Electrw Co. (Diablo Canyon Nurlear Power Plant, Ursts I and 2), A1AB 223, 8 A1:C til (1974) economic interesta proteced under NEPA: C1J-92 2,35 NRC 57 0992)

Pscifw Oas nd Elecinc Co. (fhablo Canyan Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), AIAB-728,17 NRC 777, 809 (1983) taigeility of adaguacy of Staff review; QJ-92-6,35 NRC 91 n.2 (1992)

Pennsylvania v - West Virginia, 262 U.S. 553,593 (1923) showing necessary to demanivate injury in fact; ISP-924,35 NRC 1210992)

Ponland Censral Electdc Co. (Pebble Springs Nucur Plant Umta 1 and 2), C1J-7&27,4 NRC 610, 613 14 (1976) applicacian of pdwial canceria of standag in intervene in NRC paccedmas, ISP 92-4,35 NRC 120

- 0992) irduty in fad and *,ne-d interests wsts fu standing to intervene, CU-92-2, 35 NRC 56 0992)

- Public Service Ca of Indiana (Marble tidl Nuclear Oa.eratmg Sution, Unisa I and 2), ALAB-530,9 SRC 261,273 0979).

purpse of tahrucal specificadena; LBP 92-4,35 NRC 117 0991 Public Service Ca of New !!ampshire (Seaback Sunon, Uruts I and 2), CU 7617,4 NRC 451,462

. 0 976) weight given w Staff evidence in adjudicatory pnxeedmas; CU-924 35 NRC 88-89 0992)

Public Service Ca of Oklatunna (Black Foa Sunon, Units I and 2), A1AD-388,5 NRC MO, MI (1977) coment of anellais twicts; CU-92 2,35 NRC 55 n,2 (1992)

- Rainer v. Bakery A Cenrectioaerv Workers,994 F.2d 780,782 (D C, Cir.1%8)

- peny" status seguired to request relief under Rule 60(b) of Faleral R des of Civil Procedure; CU-921,35 NRC 6 0992) -

Sampe v, Murray,415 U.S. 61,90 (1914) -

economic kna as irreptab injury for purpose of obtair.gis a suy; CU42 4,35 NRC 810992).

- Sereven v. Unned Setcs,207 F.2J 74u, DI pth tar. UJ53)

"pny" status requued to sequest relief under Rule 60(b) of Faleral Rules of Ovil Procedure; CU 92-1,35 NRC 6 0992).

' SEC v. Chene y Corp,318 U.S. 80 (1942)

. challengas to ataclards through reconsideratierr, CU-92-7,35 NRC 100 0992)

- Sierra Gub v. Monen,405 U.S. 727,739 (1972) generalized interest sa basis for struling to inmveno; LEP-924,35 NRC 122 0992) sinJ1arisies of **mfoe.nada al inteest" and " generalized interest"; CU-92 2,35 NRC 60 (1992) 15 r

.p

n..

I LEGAL CITATIONS INill',X CA.5 M Sirne v. lasiern Kentaky Welfara Rights Or;., 426 L'.S. 26, 354f' (1976) showmg onceuary to demmstra:a injury m fact, IEP 924, L NRC 121 (iH2)

Southern Cahfwma 1. dam Co (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmy Stauon, Unas 2 and 3), ALAll 268,1 NRC 383,399 (1975) weght give to Suti evsderxe in adjudgatory procert.ngs; CU 92-6,35 NRC 11,91 (1992)

Telacummumcaums kescarch and Actum Cauer v. ICC 917 E2d 585,585 (D C. Car 1990) nesus principle for standmg in pmecdural injury cans; IEP 92-4, 35 NRC 124 (1992)

Tennasee Valley Authonty (Wah liar Nuclear Plan' Umts 1 and 2), ALAll413, ' NRC 1418,1421 (1977) empicyment ints;esta as lusia for stamimg to imervene; C13 92 2, 35 NRC 57 (1992)

Tulsa Gamma Ray, Inc., LJIP 9125, 33 NRC 535 (1991) eral testimmy in sivd penahy pmceed.ngs, ISP 92-2,35 NRC 25 (1992)

Tulsa Gamma Ray, Inc., lap-9140,34 NRC 297,3%05 (1991) determanant of nature and sausit cf enfurcement adsms, IEP-92 2, 35 NTC 40 (1992)

Uruni d Carmarned Scientata v. NRC,920 E2d 50,55 (D.C. Cir.1990) acre of intervenuon rights uMer Atomic Energy Act, LEP-92-4,35 NRC 124 (1992)

United Staies v.140.80 Acres d land, Etc., 32 ER.D.11,14 (E.D 12. 1963)

"psny" s'auss required to request relief under Rule 6n(b) of Tederal RJes of Civil Pmcedure, i

CLJ-92-1,35 NRC 6 (1992)

Unned States v. Mansmgwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 3940 (1950) vacanm os decisim en mouiness grounda; Clj 92 5,35 NRC g4 (1992)

Unncd States v. R3chardson, 418 U.S.166,176-80 (1974) informatmnal staruhng for inoividuals versus that for orgamistions, CLJ 92 2, 35 NRC 60 (1992)

Umted States v. R chardaan, 418 U S.166,177 (1974) showing naceMary to demmstrata injury in Isd, ISP 924,35 NRC 121 (1992)

United Fransp. Umon v. ICC,891 F.2d 90s,91314,918-19 (D C. Cir.1989), cert demed,110 S. CL 3271 (1990) standmg to intervene where alleged Faaru injury-in-fact is speculative; ISP-924, 35 NRC 123 a 44, 124 a.44 (1992)

Valley Forse Chnatian College v. Americans United for Separauen of Church and Sute,454 Us 464, 472 (1982) showing necessary to demonstarte iryury in fact; LDP-924, 35 NRC 121 (1992)

Vermmt Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. (Vermont Yant.ee Nuclear Power Su6m), AIAll-135,6 AEC 520, 532 (1973) wetsht given to Suff evidence in adjud.catory pioceedmgs; Cl3 92-6,35 NRC 91 n 2 (1992)

Virgmia Petroleum Jdee.rs Ass *n v. I'PC,259 E2d 921,925 (D C. Cir.1958) econonus loss an irreparable injury tW purpose of obtaming a =tay; C13 924,35 NYC 51 (1992)

Warth v. Seldm,422 U.S 490,501,504 (1975) showing neeenary to demonstrate injury in faca, IDP-924, 35 NRC 121 (1992)

Wahaton Metropelaan Area Trannt Comm'n v. Itohday Tours, Inc., 559 E2d s.11, 844 (D C Cir.

1977) authority of tnhunals to stay their own orders; Cll 924,35 NRC to (1992)

Wangton Public Power Sapply System (WPPSS N iclear Project No. 2), DD 147,19 NRC 199,925 (1984) aundard few instituuan of show-cause proceedmst; DD 92-1,35 NRC 144 (1992)

Western Steel Erection Co. v. United Sutes,424 E2d 737,739 (10th Cai.1970).

"pany" status requned to request relmf under Rule 60(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Pnredure, CLJ-92,l,35 NRC 6 (1992)

W'tiderness Society v. Oriles,824 E2d 4, i9 (DC Ctr.1987) nesus pnnciple for standmg m pincedural injury caws, IEP-92 4, 35 NRC 124 (IW2) 16

LEG Al, Cll' ATIONS INillCX CAWS Wiscistun 13cetric 1%wer Co (Puim Scach Nc1 car Piara, Units I and 2 A AIAB N4,15 NRC 277,278 (1982)

Cormussi<m dureuon so wuve f<wmat requamenu for a,,pd:ste bnds Clj 92-2, 35 NRC 55 r. 2 (1992) i 9

17

-o

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX R EGUI.ATION5 to CF.R. 2.203 purpme d !!oard revww 4 seule.ners agreemaus, IRP-92 5, 35 NRC 123 (1992) 10 C.I.R. n05(f) smpe d licensmg authmty to miugato eml penalues; LEP-92 2. 35 NkC 42 (1992) 10 CF.R. 2.206 forum for challend ng future changes in techmcal spadcatuna fonowmg lar we amer.4tient; litP 92-4, i

35 NRC 124 (1992) teferral d pipe support Jesign question to Staff im review; Ct192-1,35 NRC 9 n 8 (1992) safety allegaums at Psin Verde; UD.92-1,35 NRC 13444 (1992) 10 CF.R. 2.206(a) b.ais requiranent for 1206 peutions; DD 72-1,35 NRC 142 (1992) 10 CF.R.1700 participsnan in formal NRC puccedets; G3-921, 35 htC 6 (1992) 10 CF.k. 2.707 damal of intervm6cn peuraon and disnussal of pcaiumers with preju&ct; IIP-92 3,35 NRC 109 (1992) 10 Cl.R. 2.714 cmtmu d eM deadiva fur 6hng intervenuon peuunns; IEb92-3, 35 NI,C 108 (1992) defuuuan d "peuuon*, ClJ 92-1,35 NRC 6 (1992) 10 CF.R.1714(a) and (d) sensent V intervatien peutions. CtJ-92 2,35 NRC 56 (1992) 10 CIR.1714(aXI) rntena for law interveraim; G3-92-1,35 NRC 6 (1992) intersat requironers is imervadan in operaung licmse amendment pmeceJeg; LilP.92-4, 35 NRC 120, 126 (1992) 10 CF.R. 2.714(aXib)-(v) cntena for late Usuvenuon-, 03 92-1,35 NRC 7 (1992) 6ve-facaw test for s&nissim of late 61ed cmtenuons; QJ-9.-2,35 NRC 52 (1992) 10 CFR.1714(sX2j comme d intervenien pentmns. l.EP-92-4,35 NYC '20 (1992) 10 C.FR. 2.714(hX;)

contende ruiuirmnent for intervennon; IBP-924. 35 FRC 126 (1992) 10 CF.R. 2.714(b)2) basis requiremerts for adndssion of contentiws; CIJ-92 3. 35 NRC 67 n.5 (1992) supplemmts to miervauton pentions, LEP-92-3,35 NRC 109 (1992) 10 CF.R. 2.714a appea:a d rulings an intervention; C1J-92-2, 35 NRC 54 (1992) deadime for appeal r4 denial of intervention; IIP-92-4,35 NRC 177 (1992) fwmat and saa requiremmts for appe.!! ate tme.s; C1J 92-2, 35 NRC 55 (1992) licensing boani error in in.licanng the provisirs governmg an appeal, CIL92-3, 35 NRC 67 (1992) 10 C.FA. 2.71%)

parucpauon by state depanment of envirormental quabty: CIJ-92-7,35 NkC 97 (:992) 19 l

Li' GAL CIT ATIONS INDI:X l

RI'Gl'I ATIOM l

10 CFA 2.72@)(2X) discovery fram NRC staff; LEP-92 3 A, 35 NRC 111,112 (1992) 10 CFA 2.732 burde of pamt on civil penalty orders, LEP-92-2,35 NRC 35 (1992) 10 CFA 2.734 authoniy to fde m< cons to ex5wsi; CLJ 921,35 NRC 4 (1992) 10 CFA 1734(a) criteria for vergwrang a reconi, CL1-92-1,35 NRC 4 "992) 10 CF.R. 2.734(aXI) demonstrada, d nmehness of requests to rc+cri a remrd, C1J 92-1,35 NRC 7 (1942) 10 C FA 1734(aX2) dernnnstsataen a safay or envirunmemal sigmfacance of new evidence; C1.192-1,35 NRC 8 (1972) 10 CSA 1734(aX3) demastration of maumatly dJferem scsult; Ctj 92,1,35 NRC 8 (1992) 10 CFA 2.734(b) ar: Tort.rcquimi for motims to :eepen; C1J-92-1, 35 NetC 5 (1992) i0 CFR 1740(eXIXi) licensee obhgaum to nouty staff d witness's locaaon; 1EP-92 2, 35 NRC 38 n.90 (1992) 10 CFA 2.743(b)(3) eral tesumr.ay in civil penalty procec&rgs; IEP-912,35 NRC 25 (1992) 10 CF.R.1760

?

effect of heensms bosnt errur on ireerveror's fa3ure to bncf inaues on appeal, CLJ.92 3,35 NRC 67 (1992) effecnveness of ininal decisima, IEP-92-2, 35 SVC 45 (1992) 10 CF.R.1762 effect of heensms board extor on utvenor's fadure to brief issus m appeal, CLJ-92-3,35 N1C 67 (1992) 10 CFA 2.762(b) deadline for 6hng a;tenate bnefs ClJ-92-2,35 NRC $4 (1992) 10 CFA 1762(d) fwmat and size restrictions on appeData bnefs. CLI 92-2, 35 NRC 54 (1992) 10 CFA 2.771 recmsiders6an in cmtcat d standards for bearms m uranium ennchment facihty i cense, Clj 92 7, b NRC 100 n.7 (1992) 10 CF.R. 2.785, note @)

jurisau:twn over appeals; CLJ 913,33 N1C 65 (1992) av CFA 1784 fmahty of inaial keisims; LEP-92 2,35 h1C 45 (1992) 10 CFA 2.786(bXI) administradvs remedian to be sought prior to ju6cial review; ISP-92 2,15 hVC 45 (1992) 10 CFA 2.786(bX2) length d pennons for review; IEP-92-2,35 NRC 46 (1992)

~

10 C.FA 2.786(bX4) deadhne fw seekmg renew of initia' docuims; ISP-91-2, 35 NRC 45 (1992) s la C.FA 1788 stay of hcense transler. C1J-924,35 NRC 74,76 (1992) 10 CFA 1788(c) stay of issuance d beense where there is no outstandmg order to suy; CL.1-92-2,35 NRC 61 (1992) 10 C.FR 2, Subpart L, pre-cifectiveness amice and heanngs on matenals bcenses, ClJ-92-4, 35 NRC 77 (1992) 10 CFA Part 2. A, pend : C standards for esermming amow af ovil penalty, ISP 92-2, 35 NRC 40 (1992)

(

2e l

l

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RI Gt't.AllOM 10 C F R. hn 2, Appen&a C, !!!

egregadan of violedons for amanmg seventy levela, LEP 92 2,35 NRC 410992) definium of "willfulneas'; IEP-92-2,15 NRC 42 (1992) 10 CFA Pan 2, Appen&a C, V determmars of nature and eatent of enforcement ac6ma, LEP 92 2,15 NRC 40 (1992) 10 CFA Pan 2 Amendia C. V B escalsnon or reducton of enforcanca sanc v LEP-92-2,35 NRC 41 (1992) r facumn taken into account in determming amount of civil prnslues; 12P-92-2,35 NRC 41 (199)

10 CFA Pan 2, Appendia C, V.II, Table 1 A categaizatuas of tuss civil penalues, LEP-92 2, 35 NRC 40 (1992) 10 CFA %n 1 Appenha C, VE, Table IB seventy levels of violades. IEP-92-2,35 NHC 41 (1992) 10 CF R. Pan 2, Appendia C, VS.2 mingadan of cini penaNea on oasis of administrauve changes pt m plaec t.y twensee; LEP-92-2,35 NRC 44 (1993 10 CFA Pan 2, Appenea C V.D escalanon of enferrement s,mctions; LEP 92-2,35 NRC 41 (1992) 10 CF.R. Pan 26 6tness for duty pingram for licensed nactor opersiors; LEP 92-1,35 NRC 14 0992) 10 CFA 2610(a) fttness for duiy Pmgram for laensed mactor operators; IEP 921,35 NRC 15 (1992) 10 CFA 26.24(sX2) fmpency of drug tesung cycle far ucensee employees; IEP-92-1,35 NRC 15 n.2 0992) 10 CFA 26.27(b) right d hemsce to ingwue 6 mens-for duty reqmmnents enore stringert than regulatory requ.rements; 1EP 92-1,35 NRC 15 (1992) 10 CFA Paa 26, Agai.a A 2.4(f) followup drug teenng program for Lcensee employee program; IEP 92-1,35 NRC 13 (1992) 10 CFA 27.27(h)(2) penalty for cocaine-puntive data tests: LEP-92-1,35 NRC ii (1912) 10 CFA 34.11(()(1) audi:s of radiographer perfarrnance; LEP-92-2,34 NRC 30 (1992) recordkeepmg requunnents on perfumance e,f ra&ographers; 1.flP-92-2,15 NRC 28 (1992) 10 CF.R. 34 31(a)(1) trainmg, examina ion, and ceruficadon ruimrements for rahngraphersi LEP 92-2, 35 NRC 27 (1992) 10 CFA Part 34, Appaidia A training, caaminaum, and ceniScaden mluirernents for raha,,mphers; IEP 92-2, 35 NVC 27 (1992) 10 CFA Pan 35 medical re&ography compared with industrial radiography; LDP-92 2, 35 NRC 29 rL36 (1992) 10 CF.R Pan 30 cm,doyment of noracensed personnel fm maniplanon of seacuvity-related controls; ISP-92-1, 35 NRC 14 (1992) 10 CFA 5036 centwt of technical specificauons, IEP-924,35 NRC 116 (1992) semoval of schedule for withdrawal of rescus vessel matenal surveillance specimens from technwat spectRcaums; LEP 924,35 NRC 124 (1992) 10 CFA 50.36(h) rsetusca! specincatims mpirement for operatira twennes; LDP-92 4, 35 NRC 116 0992) 10 CF R 5052 apl cabihty of Sholly pedures to p<msemen only license; CtJ42-4,35 NRC 75 0992) 4i 10 CF R. 50.54(iF(m) angloyn ca of nonlicensed perwenel for mare! anon 6f reseuvity reined controls; IEP-92-1,35 NVC 14 (1992) 21

i I

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX Rl:Gl'lATIONS 10 C F R. 50M twesee ot'

aan to report seni<w reactor operaus's tenninauun of employment, ISP-92-6, 35 NRC 131 sL1 (1992) 10 CFA 5G12 decornmissioning withov a decoremanoning plan, 01J-92-2, 35 NRC 55 a 3 (1992) 10 CF R. 50 91 heartogs a Leense amendments and no sigmfa: ant hazards cmsidendon determ:nauan; 1EP 92 A, 35 NRC 118 (1992) uw of heense arnandmcra to trasfer a I we; CL1-924,35 NRC 76 (1992) 10 CFA 50.92(c) no significars hazards ennsidera6cn decrmmatwo m reJocedon of survedlaace cepsule withdrawal schedale; 12P-92J. 35 NRC 118 (1992) 10 CFJt.. Part 50. App.mda B use of lus6ficabons for C<rtinued Operauon at Palo Verde; Di>92-1,35 NRC 137-38 (1992) 10 CFA Part 50, A venda 11,11B 3 l

removal of achedA for withirawal of wactar vwael matenal sanedlarwe specimens from technical epecifnstims; (JIP 924, 35 NRC 118 (1992) 10 CF.R. Pan 55 effect of setde ent agreement m scusatatemers of rea tor operauw brense; IBP-92-1, 35 NRC 14 (1992) 10 CF.R. Pan 55 hhpart C heahh restricuans on becasing of reactor operston; 12P 92-1,35 NRC 14 (1992) 10 CF.R. 55.31(sX3)(6) heahh restrictions on hemsing of reacuw operaiors; 11?-92-1,35 NRC 14 (1992) 10 C FA 55 55(a) expiration of sauor reaaor gerauw Lemse upon ternunauan of employmmt; ISP-92 6,35 NRC 131 (1992) 10 CF.R. 55 61 beahh restrictions on Lcenses cf reactor oprators; 12P-92-1,35 h1C 14 (1992) 10 C1R. 5436(c) types of iterns that rnust be irwtuded in tedinical p,eed. canons, l,BP 92-4, 35 NRC 117 (1992) 10 CF.R. 74.33 material control and accountng requmments for unnium cnnchmem fac0ines, Cll-92 7,35 NRC 103-04 (1992) 10 CFA 7433(2) and (3) safeguards requiremessa for uranium enchment facihues; CLJ-92-7,35 NRC 104 (1992) 10 CFA Part 100 boundary limits fur uraruum mnchment faahiles; C1J 92-7,35 NRC 101 (1992) doses from accident involving reactor cnotant pump seals; DD-92-1,35 NRC 138 (1942) 10 CF.R.1403(J) defeitmn of " financial pruiccuon"; ClJ-92-7,35 NRC 98 n.5 (1992) 10 CF.R.14al4(a)(1)

F means of pne' dang financial protecuen for urawum enndiment facihties; CtJ-92-7, 35 NRC 98 n.5 (1992) 10 CF.R.140.15 proof d hatality insurance for uranium enndtment facihues; Cll-92-7,35 NRC 91 n.5 (1992) 10 CF.R.14al5,140.16, and 140.17 inhty inwrance requirements for uramum conchment factitty beensing; Cll 92 7, 35 NRC 97 (1942)

)

to CF.R. Part 140, Append;n A rrmdels for liabihty insurance cowrage for uranium ennchment facilines; C1J 92 7,35 NRC 97 (1992) 22 i

l 1

1

... ~.~. -- -.. -. ~... _...

.ww d

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTFS Aiomie Energy Act, u,42 US C. 2111 incorporadon of seukmmt agreernent into board onier by refsrence; IN-92 5,35 NRC 129 (1992)

Annic Energy Act,16),42 U.SC 2201

(

mcorporadon of sculermeit agreemera irun bone order by teferem.e: IJ1P 92 5,35 NRC 129 (1992)

Atomic bergy Act,161c, 42 U.S.C 5 2201(c) pre-effccuvenes2 heaang regidcanen's on hcense transfers; C1J 924, 35 NRC 7L73 (1992)

Atomic Faergy Act,1824a),42 U.S.C 62212(a) i technical specifwuans requuemw for orcrsung licenses; LDP-924, 35 NRC 116 (1992)

Atomm Energy Act,134,42 UAC 2334 datutetion between tratz.fer of Innise and bcense amendmmt, QJ 924,3f NRC 76 (?992)

Atornic Energy Act,189(4A 42 UEC. 8 2239(a) automane right of wwvvntion,1.BP 934, 35 NRC 124,126 (1992) cnieria regt tred to es ablisn standmg; QJ 92-2,34 NRC 56 (1992) hearsg rights en danges in tedmical spctficadora; 1.BP-924, 35 NRC 119-20 (1992)

Atomic Faerg Act, it9att),42 U.S.C 2239(aXI) datmetaan ' etween transfer of Sznse and license amendmem; C1J 924,35 NRC 76 (1992) unenedaic cKcctiveness of transfer ci license; C1J.924,35 NRC 73 (1992)

Ausnic Ericrgy Act. 42 U S.C 5 2239(a)(2XA)

NRC authonty in issue immediately effective amendments; C1J-924,35 NRC 73 (1992)

Aton ic Energy Act. 42 tl5 C 12239(aX2XA)-(D) heannas on heense smcndmems and no signif. cant haards considerauon determinauce I !.BP-924, 31 NRC lli (1992)

Atomic Energy Act,193 heanns requiremems on uranium enrichment facilities; CIl-92 7, 35 NRC 96 (1992)

Atomic Energy Act,193(dXI) liabilay insurance requiremets for uranium ennchment facility hcensuts; C1J 92 7, 35 NRC 97 (1992)

Awnic Energy Act,193(c) apnbcability of Pnce Anderson requirements to uranium ent:chment facihties; C1J-92-7,35 NRC 98 (1992)

Pert L No.85-256, 71 Sut. 576, 6 7 (1957) p;.<effecuveness heanns requiremems; Cll 924, 35 NRC 77 (1992)

Puh L No.37-615, 76 Stat. 409, $ 2 fl162) pre eff:cuveness heanns requiremera. 'L.1-924, 35 NRC 77 (1992)

Solar, Wind, Waste and Ocothermal Power Pmducuon Incentives Act of 1990,15, 42 U.S.C 4 2243(h),

Pub.1. Na 101575 heanns requirements on uranium enrichment facilides; C1J-92 7,35 NRC 96 (1992)

I Solar, Wmd, Waste and Geothermal Ibwer Pmduction lacendves Act of 1990, 9 5(b), Pub. L Nx 101575 chalknges to standards through r ronsideration; C13-92 7. 35 NRC 100 (1992) i l

l i

b II

]

umtaggigssison

'lj;y" 3"fgfta

,2.i. >s sxc u-

> nc======,r- ~~c ""-

c.g.3 7gp g a -~u.m au~.1u-acae,-an

" ""$ '"l""f"",'Z"*jit" ffa"l2.1 u a cm1 is_<a

".fE55!AUI5=,"ra=Os" acct ="*>

i 2

25 4

m.- e

l

.s

.w.

l SUIUlrF INDEX

/

- 4

', W AVITTRUST l

suspension of luvise condiume GJ 924,35 NRC 86 (1992) l AT PEALS Commisaton disemum to wai.4 pleadma requirements. CLI 92-2,35 NRC 47 (1992) deadime for frima suppocung bners; CU 92-2,35 NRC 47 (1992) a diamissal for falure io fde supporung bnef; CL1-92 3. 35 NRC 63 (1992) fg of iniaal decisims, C13-92-2,35 NRC 47 (1992) of intervenuon densis; CU-92-135 NRC 47 (1992). CU 92 3. 35 NRC 63 (1992) 2..

ML20101R932

Text

Navigation menu

Search