ML20101N729

Forwards Summary of 841108 Monthly Meeting W/Nrc Re Const Assessment Program at Mazon Emergency Operations Facility. Next Meeting Scheduled for 841206.Visual-aid Matls Used in Presentations & Oct 1984 Const Assessment Program Rept Encl

ML20101N729
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	11/27/1984
From:	Danni Smith COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20101N699	List: ML20101N729
References
9473N, NUDOCS 8501040192
Download: ML20101N729 (56)

Text

,

f f

$ Commonwealth Edison

[

) One First Natiorul Pirra. Chiergo Ilknois

(

O

} Addr:ss R; ply to: Post OffiC2 Box 767

{

(

ChlCagO, llhnois 60690

/PRIN_CIPAL STAFF l

November 27, 1984 g p,gp y

VR6 0'tS /<w RC DRSS Mr. James G. Keppler hA0 ML Regional Administrator - Region III 3GA OL U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission IIC 01 799 Roosevelt Road ORMA FILE h/

Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Subject:

Braidwood Station Units 1 & 2 Braidwood Construction Assessment Program Docket No. 50-456 and 50-457 References (a):

J. J. O'Connor Letter to J. G. Keppler "Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP)" dated June 22, 1984 (b):

J. G. Keppler Letter to J. J. O'Connor dated July 27, 1984 (c):

J. J. O'Connor Letter to J. G. Keppler i

dated August 30, 1984 (d):

J. G. Keppler Letter to C. Reed dated September 14, 1984

Dear Mr. Keppler:

Reference (a) transmitted the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP) scope document to the NRC for review.

References (b), (c), and (d) were followup letters which resulted in BCAP approval.

The third open briefing on the status of the BCAP effort was provided to the NRC on November 8, 1984 at the Mazon EOF.

Forwarded herewith is a meeting summary including a copy of the visual-aid material used in the presentations.

The next briefing meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on December 6, 1984 at the Mazon EOF.

Also forwarded herewith for your information is the BCAP Director's Progress Report for the month of October, 1984.

Please direct any questions relating to BCAP to Mike Wallace, Assistant Manager of Projects and Braidwood Project Manager.

0 ry truly fours, y

O David H. Smith Nuclear Licensing Administrator Attachments cc:

NRC Resident Inspector - Braidwood NRC BCAP Inspector - Braidwood John Hansel - ERC N. N. Kaushal - CECO g 30 W

e c

Meeting Summary c

BCAP NRC/ CECO /ERC Monthly Meeting November 8, 1984 9:00 a.m.

Mazon EOF The meeting was opened with a brief statement by R. F. Warnick of the NRC Region III giving the purpose for the meeting, that is, to discuss BCAP, it's progress, and the Independent Expert Overview Group's (1800) review of the BCAP.

Mr. Warnick also statsd that upon completion of the presentation by CECO and the 1800, the NRC would respond to questions from the public in attendance.

The following is the agenda utilized for the remainder of the meeting.

I.

Introduction Presented by the Ceco Manager of Projects to provide the major topics of the presentation (see Enclosure 1).

II.

BCAP Task Force Presented by the BCAP Director to provide the BCAP achievements for the month of October (see Enclosure 2).

III.

Sargent & Lundy Presented by the Sargent & Lundy Project Director to provide Sargent & Lundy's status of work (see Enclosure 3).

IV.

Quality Assurance Presented by the General Supervisor of Quality Assurance to describe the overview activities of the CECO BCAP QA group (see ).

V.

IE00 Progress Report Presented by the Assistant Project Manager of the IE00 to describe the overview activities of the 1800 (see Enclosure 5).

Additional items discussed during the meeting are included in.

The attendance for the meeting is provided in Enclosure ~1.

The meeting adjourned at 11:00 a.m.

(0548J)

L J

Ihclosure 1 e

Page 1 of 1.

BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAE)

MONTHLY NRC STAFF BRIEFING NOVEMBER 8, 1984 1.

INTRODUCTION TOM MAIMAN II.

BCAP TASK FORCE NINU KAUSHAL III.

SARGENT AND LUNDY KEN K0STAL IV.

QUALITY ASSURANCE NEIL SMITH V.

INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP JOHN HANSEL

, *7 Page 1 of 20 BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP)

MONTHLY BRIEFING PRESENTED TO REGIONAL OFFICE REGION III U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

N. N. KAUSHAL BCAP DIRECTOR NOVEMBER 8, 1984 1

r..

i

,8 Page 2 of 20 PRESENTATION OUTLINE DOCUMENTATION STATUS CSR PROGRESS RPSR PROGRESS RSCAP PROGRESS MANPOWER STATUS

SUMMARY

STATUS l

(1034D)

(

• • .' *~

Page 3 of 20 BCAP DOCUMENTATION STATUS ALL PROCEDURES COMPLETED.

SEVERAL REVISED BASED ON EXPERIENCE-ALL PLANS HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY.

UPDATING OF PROGRAM DOCUMENT IN PROGRESS TO INCORPORATE COMMITMENTS TO NRC

(

(10340)

\\

(.

Enclo ur'e 2

-/.*,.'.

' Jl Page 14 of 20

)

BCAP DOCUMENTATION STATUS CONT'D

.;i UPDATING 0F THE PROGRAM DOCUMENT INCLUDES:

i MINOR EDITORIAL CHANGES'AND CORRECTIONS REVISED CRITERIA ON INSPECTION ATTRIBUTES FOR SAMPLE EXPANSIONS (PER LETTER O'CONNOR TO KEPPLER, AUGUST 30, 1984)

/

ELIMINATION OF COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE POSITION

/

l (1034D) i I

Page 5 of 20 CSR MAJOR ACTIVITIES ESTABLISH INSPECTOR POPULATIONS CERTIFICATION v

SELhCT DEVkLOP f

g->

SAMPLES CHECKLISTS i

l ll I

y I

PREPARE I

VERIFICATION l

PACKAGES I

i 1

1 i

i l

l l

l PERFORM REINSPECTION /

l l

l DOCUMENTATION REVIEW l

I I

PROCESS 11 OBSERVATIONS I

i 1

l v

g EVALUATE l__ _ _ _ _ _ _

RESULTS EXPANSION 1r FINAL REPORT (0500J)

Page 6 of 20 CSR-ESTABLISHMENT OF POPULATIONS IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION CATEGORIES:

35 CATEGORIES (P0PULATIONS) IDENTIFIED TO DATE 22 0F 35 POPULATION DESCRIPTIONS WRITTEN IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS IN POPULATION:

12 0F 35 COMPLETE (1034D)

Page 7 of 20 CSR-SAMPLE SELECTION RAND 0M PORTION:

5 0F 35 POPULATIONS COMPLETE ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT PORTION:

BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW COMMENCED 1

1 (1034D)

p-.

Ehelosure 2 l

Page 8 of 20 CSR-DEVELOPMENT OF CHECKLISTS POPULATION-SPECIFIC CHECKLISTS:

18 0F 35 REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS PREPARED 4 0F 35 DOCUMENTATION CHECKLISTS PREPARED 7 APPROVED FOR PACKAGE PREPARATION GENERIC CHECKLISTS:

2 WELDING CHECKLISTS COMPLETED (1034D)

~~

Page 9 of 20 CSR:

PREPARATION OF VERIFICATION PACKAGES 209 PACKAGES IN 5 POPULATIONS ARE RELEASED FOR REINSPECTION 0 DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PACKAGES COMPLETED APPR0XIMATELY 7000 PACKAGES REQUIRED ASSUMING NO SIGNIFICANT SAMPLE EXPANSION (1034D)

Ihclosure 2 Page 10 of 20 CSR*

INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION LEVEL III 3 DISCIPLINES CERTIFIED CIVIL / STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL WELDING IN-PROGRESS l

ELECTRICAL LEVEL II 4 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL 9 MECHANICAL 10 WELDING 0 ELECTRICAL 18 INSPECTORS CERTIFIED

Ihclosure 2

• J.

Page 11 of 20 l

CSR:

REINSPECTIONS AND DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS REINSPECTIONS:

COMMENCED OCTOBER 5, 1984 85 COMPLETE AS OF NOVEMBER 6, 1984 131 OBSERVATION REPORTS WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS:

f NOT STARTED 1

(1034D)

Page 12 of 20 CSR-EVALUATION OF RESULTS l

l PROCEDURE ISSUED NOVEMBER 2, 1984 NO WORK T0 DATE 4

(1034D) j b

i

IMclosure 2 Page 13 of 20 RPSR MAJOR ACTIVITES OVERALL RPSR CONSISTS OF THREE PRINCIPAL STEPS.' -

IDENTIFY APPLICABLE SARGENT & LUNDY SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES.

PREPARE CHECKLISTS INCLUDING:

CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FROM FSAR AND SPECIFICATIONS PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION / CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS REVIEW CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES AGAINST CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS t

(1034D) i 1

m a -. - <

~

-v--,

~

v--wn----

v

,.-a w

-,--w-ww+ ~, - -,-

,--w

- ~-

Ihclosure 2 Page II4 of 20

'e.

RPSR PROGRESS CONT'D IDENTIFI^ATION OF APPLICABLE SARGENT & LUNDY SPECIFICATIONS:

7 SPECIFICATIONS APPLICABLE 2 SPECIFICATIONS UNDER STUDY IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES:

425 PROCEDURES FROM 7 CONTRACTORS CONSIDERED 350 VERIFIED APPLICABLE AS OF JUNE 30, 1984 (1034D)

Page 15 of 20 RPSR PROGRESS CONT'D IDENTIFICATION OF U aSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN FSAR:

REVIEW COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN SEVEN APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS:

APPR0XIMATELY 40% COMPLETED IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION / CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS:

COMPLETED i

(1034D)

Page 16 of 20 RPSR PROGRESS CONT'D l

COMPARISON OF CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS TO CONTRACTOR PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS:

WAL!THROUGH CONDUCTED TO CHECK WORKABILITY OF PROCEDURAL STEPS i

IDENTIFICATION OF CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS NOT C0VERED BY CONTRACTOR PROCEDURES:

WALKTHROUGH CONDUCTED TO CHECK WORKABILITY OF PROCEDURAL STEPS

-(1034D)

Ihclosure 2

• ., - - *^,

Page 17 of 20 RSCAP PROGRESS REVIEW 0F TWO (2) ADDITIONAL SCAP'S WAS INITIATED DURING-THE LAST MONTH.

THIS BRINGS ALL SCAPS'(LISTED BELOW) UNDER RSCAP REVIEW:

4 QUALITY CONTROL STRUCTURAL STEEL REVIEW l

SAFETY RELATED PIPE SUPPORTS NSSS COMPONENT SUPPORTS QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR REINSPECTION-(ON HOLD)

ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW REINSPECTION OF SAFETY RELATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT HVAC WELDING, CONFIGURATION, STIFFENERS FITTINGS

-PIPING MATERIAL VERIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY INSTRUMENTATION INSTALLATION VERFICATION (1034D)

l, Page 18 of 20 RSCAP PROGRESS CONT'D WORK PRIORITIES WERE REARRANGED TO COMPLETE REVIEW 0F COMMITMENTS FOR ALL SCAP'S TO SUPPORT QUALITY ASSURANCE TASK FORCE RSCAP ELECTRICAL LEAD WAS TEMPORARILY ASSIGNED TO CSR FOR CERTIFICATION AS LEVEL III ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR (103 LID)

Page 19 of 20 1

BCAP

SUMMARY

STATUS ALL PROCEDURES AND PLANS ARE COMPLETE RPSR AND RSCAP CONTINUE.o MAKE SATISFACTORY PROGRESS CSR INSPECTIONS ARE UNDERWAY, SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS IS BEING MADE 1

4 1

(1034D)

• J "

Page 20 of 20 i

9 e

~

n t.O CD

~\\

m

//< ~ _\\

p 4

//

r r

/

LO CD

/ /.///',

~N

,-t

/

/ //

f j'

m

-s x

CM h

/

/

Ny/' 228,8//T,Y// V,fQIfVffd#?

y g

=

/-

/

,, /m g// b

-~

Y

~

l.e _

E

///

W,

. /

./

/

=

c wd..wA. x;rliidn:p:,y a:y n

n::.m::.:xc o, w w md:

/

1. g.

e p:w.~: uand g

.4,.

w h !,, hh

! w i p p} k +-

W

$ k hhhkhha kh hh

!h 7

h ne wa g$Ps!Sisss&d#

4NEWi%yp;::M3L![$M@@

dnk9:?W mw s2 $@.uli!

a e

5

//. i:Q:qiiW4.-

$f a n ?.

f.4. h.5'YW M $ ?.[tg s(, syd..?.kjj j.i.r is.

h.i.jsi.

k*Qp]ps2,v<...>Wja i

.:. :::i.NM'dlis, Es..:!!!.,j.j,

/.

g:p:glwc.r Lw 244Q p

yff

c..v

,a

2

?O

//.

di,j p:gs g ggi :-4

%:4 m::lc C: ^.%:R$:

3:':o Nief: gje 3s5;p, ?Masjj ::!:::d j

g 4

h:1?

.4 ::b.

t m

r%:T:

):.f::' C 7::XSt:pf%: EI!,:#:.fd3: :ER$3 :e.sE"i:#f;(

y

\\

/

'?

&f.52 :#:

NC 3

h!kk k hN hhMihhlhhI:hk!

f[slhk$h}h

[, /

,a

.:rc::h-4;,ie:2b nd:: cl 2...

nt:s M. n gs set:M g$:c.w am g.

ssh meg:

,;:p:;s sdh

p:m. np:' :gtpag:s 1ct r:r:* 8 man a ism:s g: :t:q g%6 ?

CD

$v.:ng'4

- Mre

/,

f. s :ps'e@:

43g

g:g cc hw;,esws::%w.y:ptr a.

d,.,

gb wg w,

N we<dx: c: M co a

m.g.

,. m.9.c 2c.v.p::m::.

.y.:~

@p9.sy vhem v

wpta;.nw e

4e

/

befi$$ii$$:d:$3!hi:i3{!5$!{3:#m

!;%i3h

/

tpri 5-N2;r:e m.y:r2 j//

7 M. 4 cl ':f. 34.:

CD

. f:::y,.

f: 5 t:d

,:'.;3. ja: 0

.:.;}: g s

f aw JJ..:\\cro.

@/,k 2pi.: $P;i$si:!.!Pl!,.c.

//-

s 3

-.5ilft L1J

q:;4;;j{;$ sis;;:;;41ik.j

'p:j\\

-J

.2 l

e i

LL i

_. _N

,s"Sp!"i t

o

ks'z 3.,g ".33H.T

.^

.{d.%,....<iU. -

l b b:si.:di L1J 4

4h s -

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

e o

e o

o e

a a

a e

a w S cn co t'~

o to

<r m

cs

,-s C o-t e

i t$

Page 1 of k s

Sargent & Lundy Braidwood Organization Chart Projects Director Byron /

Braidwood D.L. Leone I

Progect Director Braedwood K. T. Kostat Projects Manager Byron

• Braidwood W. C. ClefI

Byron Project Manager D

Braidwood s

G.C. Jones I

I I

I I

I Overalt Field Mechanical Senior Electrical Senior BCAP Coordinafors Project Engineers Protect Engineers Structural S&L

• D. A. Gallagher

• R. J. Rakowski

• B. G. Treece Project Engineers Liaison K.J.Fus K. J. Green T. B. Thorsell

• R.J. Netret

• D. Fischer T. D. Hottle P K. Agrawal D. Haley S. Bertheau C. S. Lim K. Novatny K. R. Novatny S.H. Chen J. L. Tenwinkel

• Indicates primary responsibility for 5099-1 overall project design and coordination 11-84 258/K

Enclorure 3 Page 2 of 4 SARGENT 3 LUNDY

~

BCAP ORGANIZATION CHARI PROJECT DIRECTOR CECO BCAP I

I i

g. gOSTAL l

ORGANIZATION PROJECT BCAP MANAbER

_____1______________

DIRECTOR G. JONES N. KAUSHAL S&L LIAISON D. FISCHER BCAP GROUP STR513At etl51

• t M

sA OvERAtt PROJECT P

FIELD ENGINEER ENGIN ER ENGIN R

COORDINATOR R. NETZEL B. TREECE R. RAK0WSKI D. GALLAGHER h _ __ _ _ __ I. __ _ __ __ __ _ j j

l I

HOM 0FFICE FIElg0FFICE LEGEND:

t E GIN RING GIN RING ADMINISTRATION g

O 00R INATOR C OR INATOR COMMUNICATION i J. GRUNDMAN B. PARDUHN TRANSFER OF DISCREPANCIES

Ehclosura 3 Page 3 of 4 11-7-84 l

SARGENT & LUNDY SCOPE RESPOND TO BCAP DOCUMENT REQUESTS PREPARE RESPONSES TO ECAP TECHNICAL INFORMATION REQUESTS REVIEW CSR CHECKLISTS i

EVALUATE RPSR CONCERNS EVALUATE CSR DISCREPANCIES

?

1 6

+

. Enclosure 1 4-Page h of 4, e'

11-7-84 SARGENT & LUNDY l

STATUS OF WORK-LIAIS0N GROUP CSR CHECKLISTS RECEIVED 11 RETURNED 8

TECHNICAL INFORMATION REQUESTS RECEIVED 60 RETURNED 56 DOCUMENT REQUESTS RECEIVED 18 RETURNED 18 ENGINEERING EVALUATI0t!S GROUP CSR DISCREPANCIES RECEIVED 31

.,e

__m-,-

Page 1 of 1h w

BCAP 0.A.

MONTHLY BRIEFING N. P. SMITH NOVEMBER 8. 198tl (0109B)

Enclosure h Page 2 of 1h 0

ORGANIZATION / PERSONNEL 0

DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS 0

D0r' LENT REVIEWS 0

AUDIT / SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULES AND RESULTS 0

0.A. OVERINSPECTION 0

HOLD P0INTS 9

(0109B)

7 Enclosure h Fage 3 of 14 9

ORGANIZATION / PERSONNEL n,

. o.....

0 ONE ENGINEER HAS BEEN ADDED TO STAFF AS TEMPORARY LEAD ENGINEER REPLACEMENT 0

ONE INSPECTOR WAS DENIED CERTIFICATION AND RELEASED 9

ONE INSPECTION SUPERVISOR RESIGNED 0

ONE INSPECTION SUPERVISOR HAS BEEN ASSIGNED 1

1 (0109B)

PERSONNEL hNgh $"$E 1h 1

EXPERIENCE LEVELS (AVERAGE YEARS)

POSITIONS OVERALL NUCLEAR Q.A.

OCT. 1 NOV. 5 0CT. 1 NOV. 5 0CT. 1 NOV. 5 GENERAL SUPERVISOR - 0.A.

LEAD ELEMENT' ENGINEERS 22.9 22.9 15.9 15.9 5.0 5.0 OVERINSPECTION SUPERVISOR 1

Q.A. ENGINEERS / SPECIALISTS INSPECTORS 17.8 17.4.*

7.4 8.3*

N/A N/A i

- 1 RESIGNED

- 1 RELEASED l

+ 1 ASSIGNED j

- 1 TOTAL CHANGE j

e 4

Page 5 of 1h

~

DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS (0CTOBER) 0 ADDED 1. Q.A. SPECIAL INSTRUCTION O

REVISED 6 Q.A. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS 0

DELETED 1 0.A. SPECIAL INSTRUCTION 0

CONDUCTED TRAINING FOR T!!E AB0VE CHANGES O

REVISED Q.A. PLAN (0109B)

Enclosure Page 6 of 1h I

DOCUMENT REVIEWS' (0CTOBER)

REVISIONS TO POLICY PLANS 1

s N /

REVISIONS TO PROLELURES/INSTRUr,TIONS 22 LESSON PLANS 2

EXAMINATION QUESTION BANKS 1

CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS 0l,

.c REINSPECTION CHECKLISTS / INSTRUCTIONS 19

)

CERTIFICATION PACKAGES t,

37

' ' ~

82 l

l

/

(0109B) j.'

s

.u

-oe-mem7" S3EDULE SHEET 1 OF 1 Enclosure h Page ? cf 14 SCHEDULED AUDIT

- COMPLETED AUDIT ACTIVITY /

i SUBJECT AREA MONTH SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER

- DECEMBER b '

16,.

14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 23 30 07 14 21 28-CSR - PROCEDUREL1

?.. y BCAP-20 XlXl Xl BCAP-21 XlXl ~

Xl BCAP-22 XlXl Xl BCAP-23 XlXl Xl BCAP-24 XlXl Xl RPSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-41 XIXl Xl BCAP-42 XlXl Xl BCAP-43 XlXl Xl RSCAP - PROCEDURES BCAP-60 XlXl Xl ADMIN. - PROCEDURES BCAP-01 XlXl Xl BCAP-02 XIXl XI BCAP-03 XlXl Xl BCAP-04 XlXl Xl BCAP-06 XlXl Xl BCAP-07 XlXl Xl BCAP-08 XlXl XI l

{0069B)

~

BCAP Q.A. SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE.

SHEET _1_ 0F _1_l-I"AI')

Enclosure h Dage 8 of 1h~

\\/

' SCHEDULED SURVEILLANCE

/N CC91PLETED SURVEILLANCE EAR 1984 t'

ACTIVITY /

l SUBJECT AREA MONTH

-SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 07 14 21 28 I

CSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-20 XIX XIXl XIXl Xl XI BCAP-21 XIX XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl XI BCAP-22 XIXl XIXl XIXl XI Xl BCAP-23 XIX XIXl XIXl XIXl Xl XI BCAP-24 XIXl XIXl XlXI XIXl Xl XI s

RPSR - PROCEDURES BCAP-41 l

XIXl XlXI XIXl XIXl XI XI l

BCAP-42 XIXl XIXll]ClXl XIXl XI XI 1

BCAP-43 XIXl XIXl XIXl I Xl l

RSCAP - PROCEDURES BCAP-60 XIXl XIXl XIXl XlXl XI XI ADMIN, - PROCEDURES BCAP-01 XIXl XIXl XIXl XI XI BCAP-02 XIXl XIXl XIXl XI XI BCAP-03 XIXl XIXl XIXl XI XI BCAP-04 XIXl-XIXl XIXl XI XI r

BCAP-06 XIXl XIXl XI Xl XI 3

BCAP-07 XIXL XIXl XI XI XI BCAP-08 XIXl XIXl XI XI XI 1

4 (0069B) i

.e.

s

Enclosure h Page 9 of 1h' l.

1 f

AUDIT RESUITS (0CTOBER)

FINDINGS PROCEDURES OPENED CLOSED ADMIN-0 0

CSR 1

1 RSCAP 0

0 RPSR 0

0 TOTAL 1

1 1 FINDING INVOLVED PROCEDURAL INADEQUACY (N0W CLOSED).

1 FINDING INVOLVES FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURE (RESOLUTION PENDING)

E' 9

m'm

.A-.

Enclosure h s

Page 10 of 1h SURVElli ANCE RESULTS (OCTOBER)

ITEMS PROCEDURES OPENED CLOSED ADMIN 2

0 CSR 2

0 RSCAP 0

0 RPSR 0

0 TOTAL 4

0 2 ITEMS INVOLVE PROCEDURAL INADEQUACY (RESOLUTION PENDING).

2 ITEMS INVOLVE FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES (RESOLUTION PENDING).

s a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~

Page 11 of 14 G

(

AUDIT AND SURVFill ANCE RFSul TS (T0 - DATE)

FINDING AND ITFMS PROCFDURFS OPENED CL OSFD ADMIN 9

7 CSR 9

6 RSCAP 1

1

~

RPSR 0,

O TOTAL 19 14 L

9 (0109B)

~

, + -, - -,,,,-

-y---

-.-.--.,---.-----.er-

,,,e

Pgef[of1h l

t 5

f 0.A. OVERINSPECTION 9

INDEPENDENT VALIDATION PERFORMED BY Q.A. OVERINSPECTION' GROUP 0

BCAP REINSPECTOR'S IDENTITY UNKNOWN TO Q.A. OVERINSPECTOR S

RESULTS OF Q.A. OVERINSPECTION REPORTED AND RECORDS RETAINED (0109B)

Enclosure h Page 13 of 1h 0.A. OVERINSPECTION (CONTINUED) 0 ROLE OF 0.A. IS OVERVIEW 9

ALLOWS 0.A. OVERINSPECTOR TO JUDGE THE QUALITY OF THE BCAP TASK FORCE INSPECTION FOR EACH ITEM INSPEClED 0

ALLOWS 0.A. OVERINSPECTOR TO CONCENTRATE OVERVIEW EFFORT IN P0TENTIAL PROBLEM AREAS 0

PERMITS TIMELY FEEDBACK TO THE BCAP TASK FORCE INSPECTOR i

(0109B)

Enclosure k

~

o.'

-Page lh of'1h i

HOLD POINTS PUP. POSE:

TO PUT BCAP-0.A. IN A PRO-ACTIVE MODE IN ASSURING QUALITY 8

BCAP Q.A. LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1984 PLACED HOLD POINT ON j

- IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLETED CHECKLISTS FOR CSR AND RPSR

- INSPECTOR PERFORMANCE OF FIELD INSPECTIONS 4

9 INCREMENTAL LIFTING OF HOLD POINT

- RPSR - HOLD RELEASED OCTOBER 3, 1984

- CSR - HOLD LIFTED FOR FOLLOWING:

HVAC HANGERS AND AUXILIARY STEEL HVAC DUCT CONCRETE PLACEMENT j

SMALL BORE PIPE CONFIGURATION i

- INSPECTORS - HOLD BEING RELEASCD FOR INDIVIDUAL INSPECTORS l

FOLLOWING BCAP Q.A. CERTIFICATION REVIEW (0109B)

Page 1 of 8 BCAP STATUS MEETING for October, 1984 INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP k

1 November 8, 1984

-l

20 n;i TOPICS o

Executiye Summary a

Documentation Reviews Completed o

Overview Activities o

Status of Observations and Requests for Corrective Action i

i o

Open Issues and Concerns

Page 3 of 8 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

o BCAP OVERVIEW Well structured and designed to provide insight into the quality of construction at the Braidwood Station.

o CSR ELEMENT Positive audit results - reinspections underway, some rough edges require re-fi nement.

o RPSR Positive audit results - most preparatory work for procedure reviews has been com-pl eted.

o RSCAP Effort to ensure the problems are properly defined is nearing completion.

l o

BCAP QA Doing a good job of checks to ensure com-pli ance with procedures.

l Page 4 of 8'

+

DOCUMENT REVIEWS COMPLETED PLANS o

RSCAP Pl an, Rev.1 o

Overview Pl an, Rev.1 PROCEDURES o

BCAP-02, Rev.1 - Organization and Responsibility o

BCAP-03, Rev. 1 - Records Management o

BCAP-04, Rev. 2 - BCAP Interface with Contractors o

BCAP-06, Rev. 3 - Observation and Discrepancy / Concern Processing o

BCAP-07, Rev. 1 & 2 - BCAP Reports o

BCAP-42, Rev.1 & 2 - RPSR - Preparation of Checklist BCAP/QA PROCEDURES o

QASI-04, Rev. 3 - Training Qualification and Certification of QA Personnel CSR CHECKLISTS o

Small Bore Piping Configuration S&L PROCEDURES o

PI-BB-75, Rev. 0 - Engineering Evaluation of BCAP Di screpancies/ Concerns i

$$ E3!

+.

OVERVIEW ACTIVITIES AUDITS o-BCAP QA (0 findings, 3 concerns) o CSR (0 findings) o RPSR (0 findings)

SURVEILLANCES o

CSR (Popul ations)

HVAC hanger / auxiliary steel welding reinspection Concrete pl acement reinspection (Issued Observations BCAP-0BS-003 and BCAP-0BS-004)

HVAC hanger /auxili ary steel welding QA overinspection Electrical Conduit o

RPSR o

RSCAP o

Inspector Certifications

Enclo:ura 5 Page 6 of 8 Observations Answered RCA's Open or Activities for October or Findings Sati sf actorily Wri tten Unresolved Mo.

Cum.

Mo.

Cum.

Mo.

Cum.

Mo.

Cum.

AUDITS:

RSCAP O

0 Admi ni strati on 0

4 0

4 SURVEILLANCES:

CSR 2

3 1

1 2

2 RPSR RSCAP l

Admini stration 0

1 0

1 BCAP Quality Assurance INSPECTIONS:

TOTAL 2

8 1

6 2

2

Page T of 8 CLOSED ISSUES / CONCERNS 7

2 CSR

[

A sati sf actory resol ution to observa-tion BCAP-0BS-002 (Smal1 Bore Piping 1

Configuration) was received.

The re-sults of the resolution were incorpo-i rated into the revised checklist.

The CSR Plan was revised and reissued resolving open issues against that i

plan.

RSCAP Procedure BCAP-60 was revised and l

reissued resolving open issues against l

that procedure.

1 I

GENERAL Procedure BCAP-07 was revised and re-issued resolving open issues against i

that procedure.

i e

- _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _. _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _. _

Page 8 of 8 l

I OPEN ISSUES / CONCERNS ISSUES 1)

Revisions of documents:

a)

BCAP Program Document b)

BCAP QA Pl an 2)

Response to Observations BCAP-0BS-003 and BCAP-0BS-004 (Concrete Pl acement Popul ati on)

CONCERNS 1)

Inspector certifications - Level III Electrical not yet certified i

2)

Reinspection results - Di fferences i

between BCAP and BCAP QA inspectors

. ~-.

co -

Items Discussed At The NRC/ CECO /ERC Meeting

^

November 8, 1984 9:00 a.m.

-Q.

Is the removal of the IBOG interface representative in line with the

-revised protocol?

l A.

Yes, this action is within the protocol established.

Q.

What is the status of the BCAP Electrical level III inspector?

A.

One Level III candidate failed to pass the examination and has been removed as a candidate. The second Level III candidate has successfully i

passed the testing and only requires BCAP QA to complete an audit of his parent company. This candidate is expected to be certified by mid-November. The third candidate is currently undergoing testing and is expected to be certified during the month of November.

Q.

How will engineering judgment be applied to the CSR sample selection?

A.

Engineering judgment will be und to select additional items for reinspection based on review of 50.55e reports and picking items from systems more important to safety.

It was noted that none of the engineering judgment sample had been selected to date.

Q.

The IBOG has issued observation BCAP-OBS-004 recently. What is CECO i

doing to resolve this concern?

A.

Each of the four specific items stated in Observation 004.are being i

addressed as well as estat,11shing the methodology for the evaluation of i

differences between BCAP and BCAP QA overinspection results. This methodology will also establish acceptance levels for inspection f

discrepancies.

Q.

Has Sargent & Lundy reviewed the observation concerning cracks in the HVAC base metal?

(

A.

That observation is currently undergoing evaluation by Sargent & Lundy.

Upon completion, the results will be discussed with the NRC.

l l

l Q.

What addresses the acceptability of the original inspector?

A.

This will be addressed as a part of the QC Inspector Reinspection program at Braidwood Station.

1 i

l (0552J)

Enclosura 6 Page 2 of 2 Q.

If during Sargent & Lundy's evaluation of an observation something i

requiring reporting under Part 21 is identified, who will report it?

A.

Ceco will report it.

I The NRC discussed with Ceco and the ISOG the two approaches to the BCAP QA overinspection. One approach to be a complete overinspection and the other a validation overinspection to confirm the LCAP Task Force reinspection results. It was left that BCAP QA would develcp additiona? backup to support the validation overinspection approach.

The NRC discussed with CBCo and the IBOG the need to establish a method for ovaluating the performance of the Level II inspectors.

It was understood that Ceco would establish the methodology to evaluate the performance and i

acceptability of the Level II inspector's work.

1 In conclusion the NRC stated that they feel that the BCAP was going along well. They indicated that ERC was doing a good job and Q.A. was doing a very good job. They stated they were comfortable with the effort at this time.

i The next meeting was set for December 6, 1984, 9:00 a.m. at the Mazon EOF.

This concluded the presentation from Ceco to the NRC.

At this time the 4

NRC opened the meeting for questions to the NRC from the public in attendance.

)

Q.

Does the NRC feel that the turnover of three BCAP QA personnel affected:

j A.

Productivity, or B.

Represents an overall concern?

A.

It was felt that the loss of the three BCAP.QA personnel early in the program did not affect the productivity and that no overall co".cern had been identified at this time.

Q.

Does the NRC have a concern with the performance of the Level II l

inspectors?

j A.

There is not concern at this time. It was stated that the NRC feels that j

BCAP has a good inspector training program.

It was further stated that l

CECO is working to establish the methodology to evaluate inspector j

performance.

Q.

Concern was expressed over the change in approach proposed for the BCAP l

QA overinspections.

l l

A.

The NRC stated that they have already planned to follow this item closely, and that Ceco has agreed to satisfy the NRC and the IEOG with their overview inspection approach.

There being to further questions, the meeting was adjourned.

I (0552J)

o Enclosura 'l List of Attendees NAME POSITION ORGANIZATION R. A. Gardner Reactor Inspector Region III, NRC R. F. Warnick Chief, Branch 1 Region III, NRC B. Davis Deputy Regional Admin.

Region III, NRC R. D. Schulz Sr. Resident - Braidwood Region III, NRC C. C. Stokes Consultant P. S. Ass.

D. Cassel Attorney BPI R. J. Lauer Attorney Isham, Lincoln & Beal E. D. Swartz Nuclear Licensing Admin.

CECO J. G. Toscas Admin. Assist., Nuclear Info CECO /Comm. Service C. W. Schroeder Proj. Lic. & Compliance Supt.

CECO R. R. Minue Nuclear Engineer State of IL Dept.

Nuclear Safety G. P. Hoppe Engineer IL Commerce Commission J. D. Deress Proj. Eng. Mgr, BY/BR CECO V. A. Hoffman Site Manager of SWEC SWEC M. I. Miller Attorney IL & B A. Scaccia Off Site Emer. Planner CECO D. L. Leone Projects Eng. Mgr. - BY & BR CECO G. F. Marcus Director of Quality Assurance CECO G. M. Orlov Asst. Director BCAP CECO R. L. Byers Asst. Director BCAP CECO K. T. Kostal Project Director Braidwood S&L R. E. Ham 180G, Asst. Project Manager ERC J. L. Hansel IEOG Project Manager ERC N. P. Smith General Supervisor - QA CECO D. L. Shamblin Proj. Const. Superintandent CECO E. E. Fitzpatrick Asst. Manager QA CECO T. J. Maiman Manager of Projects Ceco N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director Ceco (0549J)

(_-_-_--

e i

Braidwoc'l Station Braidwood Constructica Assessment Program Report Period October 1, - October 31, 1984 1.

SUNIARY STATUS This is the fourth monthly Progress Report on the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP), covering the period from October 1, through October 31, 1984.

During this period, CSR inspections were begun on four populations and additional inspection packages were prepared. In the RPSR effort, applicable Sargent & Lundy specifications were identified and appropriate construction requirements were transferred to checklists. Under RSCAP, the remaining two additional programs were brought under review and progress was made in the review of all nine programs.

Progress on all parts of the program continued to be audited and surveilled by Independent Expert Overview Gro 1p (IEOG) and Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance. Where necessary, plans, procedures and activities were altered to accomunodate their comments and recommendations an.d to take advantage of work experience.

As of October 31, the number of personnel assigned to the BCAP effort has risen to 87.

Satisfactory office and clerical support continues to be available to the BCAP workforce.

II.

SCHEDULE ANALYSIS A rescheduling effort has been initiated for the balance of the BCAP work to take into account the current status of the program. New milestone dates and additional resource requirements are to be defined during November.

Preliminary estimates indicate that the work will extend through March 1985.

III. PERSONNEL AND EOUIPMENT STATUS BCAP manpower totaled 87 as of October 31, 1984. A total of eighteen Inspectors (Level II and Level III) were certified during October.

Inspection personnel activities have included training, accessibility walkdowns and reinspections.

The Mapper system, for tracking observations and verification packages, is now operational.

50-fcs co-yc7

o b

o IV.

BCAP ELEMENT STATUS A. CSR Status During October, work concentrated on preparing visual inspection PacPages and performing inspections on four populations, including HVAC Ducts, Dact Hangers, Concrete Placements, and Small Bore Pipe Configuration. In addition, visual inspection packages were made ready for conduit inspection.

A total of-90 observations are being processed. Structural observations related mainly to embedment plates. Observations related to HVAC duct hangers and duct work involve undersize and undercut welds, damage, and out of tolerance dimensions.

Twenty-four af 70 checklists and instructions have completed technical review; nine were submitted to Quality Assurance, Sargent and Lundy and IEOG for review. A total of 150 reinspection packages, representing all four CSR disciplines, were prepared.

In addition to the four populations now being inspected, immediately following in November will be populations of Large Bore Pipe configuration, Small Bore Pipe Supports and Large Bore Pipe Supports. Also expected to begin in November is inspection of Conduit Hangers and Cable.

J B.

RPSR Status During October 1984, the RPSR group was primarily involved in l

listing construction requirements from applicable Sargent & Lundy specifications on checklists. To date, seven specifications have been identified as applicable to RPSR. With the exception of 15 technical questions remaining to be resolved, this effort was completed for 8 of the anticipated 28 checklists. Thirty other technical questions related to the seven specifications were resolved during the effort.

I After technical questions are resolved, construction requirements identified during the FSAR review will be included on checklists.

These checklists will then be used in accordance with BCAP-43 to compare FSAR and specification requirements with those in contractor procedures.

I The anticipated number of checklists reported last month was 21.

i The increase to 28 was due to the addition during October of lists for personnel qualification and certification requirements.

An audit was performed by ERC during the week of October 22, 1984.

No findings were reported.

(0509J) 2 Q. ' '

O

.+

o C.

RSCAP Status The review of the nine programs listed below was initiated and has progressed as shown:

a.

Quality control Structural Steel Review -75%.

b.

Safety Related Pipe Supports - 70%.

c.

NSSS Component Supports - 60%.

d.

Electrical Installation Documentation Review - 40%.

e.

Quality control Inspection Reinspection Program has been suspended by Ceco Management - On Hold.

f.

Reinspection of Safety Related Mechanical Equipment - 10%.

g.

HVAC Welding, Configuration, Stiffeners, Fittings - 25%.

h.

Piping Heat Number Traceability - 10%.

Reviews and surveillances of RSCAP Progress were conducted by CECO corporate Q.A. and BCAP - Q.A.

No findings were reported.

V.

PROBLEMS /DISCREPANCE FINDINGS A.

Implemenation Problems certification of a Level III Inspector for the electrical descipline could not be accomplished in October. One candidate did not pass the commonwealth Edison practical test. A second candidate certification could not be completed pending an i.udit of the Quality Assurance program of his parent company. A third candidate is currently being tested. Lack of a certified Level III electrical inspector has prevented initiation of inspection work in the electrical area. However, intensive efforts are underway to expedite certification of a Level III electrical inspector and the problem is expected to be resolved by mid November.

(0509J) 3 u

J

-m 3

o B.

Discrepancy Findings As stated in section IV, a total of 90 observation reports have been written as of October 31, 1984. Of these, review for validity has been completed for 19.

Of the 19 reviewed, 17 have been determined to be valid discrepancies and have been forwarded to Sargent & Lundy for review for design significance.

To date S&L has not identified any discrepancy as design sign.ficant.

VI.

RECOSMDIDATIONS No specific recommendations are offered at this time.

(

N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director (0509J) 4 0