ML20101L467
| ML20101L467 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 12/12/1984 |
| From: | Arrar D, Farrar D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101L448 | List: |
| References | |
| 9514N, NUDOCS 8501020237 | |
| Download: ML20101L467 (4) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
Commonwealth Edison One First Naterri Plar* Chicigo. Ill.nois Address Reply to. Post Office Box 767 Chicags, filinois 60690 December 12, 1984 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 l
l
Subject:
LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Response to Inspection Report Nos. 50-373/84-18 and 374/84-24 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374
Reference:
L. R. Greger letter to Cordell Reed l
dated November 7, 1984.
Dear Mr. Keppler:
This letter is in response to the inspection conducted by al., on October 9 through 11 1984 of activities at Mr. Ploski, et.
LaSalle County Station.
The Commonwealth Edison response to the l
five exercise weaknesses identified in the inspection report is attached.
If ycu have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this office.
Very truly yours, h %u be D. L. Fat;ar Director of Nucl-ar Licensing im cc:
NRC Resident Inspector - LSCS
%1hh7$
0
.O(C j 3 {gg4 9514N
v.
ATTACHMENT COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Response To Exercise Weaknesses GSEP Exercise Inspection Report Nos. 50-373/84-18 And 50-374/84-24 1.
Weakness:
There was a lack of proceriural guidance regarding the formulation and documentation of adequately detailed followup messages to offsite authorities, per the commitment in Section 6-1 of the GSEP.
(Paragraph Sa)
(373/84-18-01 and 374/84-24-01)
Response
Station Director (Acting Station Director) Implementing Procedure, LZP 1110-1 shall be revised to provide guidance on followup messages by January 1, 1985.
2.
Weakness:
Procedure LZP 1310-1, Paragraph F.1, contained incorrect and misleading guidance regarding how declaration time is reported and elasped time is measured on occasions when personnel recognize events which warrant an emergency declaration.
(Paragraph Sa) (373/84-18-02 and 374/84-24-02)
Response
Procedure LZP 1310-1, Notifications, shall be revised to correct the guidance regarding declaration time by January 1, 1985.
3.
Weakness:
The licensee failed to meet the exercise objective of -
adequately demonstrating post-accident sample collection and analysis capabilities utilizing the High Range Sampling System (HRSS).
(Paragraph Sc) (373/84-18-03 and 374/84-24-03)
l
. 3.
Response
Corporate Emergency Planning is currently developing a surveillance procedure for Station GSEP Coordinators.
The HRSS as well as other systems related to emergency preparedness will be included in this surveillance.
Corporate Emergency Planning expects to have a working draft of this procedure by April 1, 1985.
The !aRSS has been added to the Corporate exercise checklist to ensure its readiness if sampling is required.
In addition, the NRC is invited to observe the next scheduled Health Physics drill involving HRSS at La Salle Station.
If the drill does not occur prior to the next scheduled exercise, then HRSS shall be included as an exercise objective.
4.
Weakness:
The overall performance of the licensee's technical spokespersons in the Joint Public Information Center was poor, while the press releases were inadequately detailed.
(Paragraph Se) (373/84-18-04 and 374/84-24-04)
Response
The technical spokespersons although technically competent have had no formal training in the area of public information.
Production Training Department is currently developing a training matrix for GSEP personnel.
Additional courses required will be developed in early 1985.
It is reasonable to expect that all technical spokespersons will receive formal training by the end of 1985.
5.
Weakness:
Personnel assigned to the dedicated GSEP Van were unfamiliar with operating some of its equipment.
Replacement environmental TLDs were not available to the monitoring team utilizing this vehicle.
(Paragraph 5f)
(373/84-18-05 and 374/84-24-05)
.;.e'
-3_
5.
Response
La Salle Radiation Chemistry Technicians will.recieve formal familiarization training with the GSEP Van during the 1985 RCT Retraining Program.
TLD's have been ordered for the GSEP Van and will be'added
. to the Van inventory.
l 9
9514N
$