ML20101L089
| ML20101L089 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1992 |
| From: | Woodard J SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9207060250 | |
| Download: ML20101L089 (2) | |
Text
__-..__-._.m.____m__-.
0
{a
,e'atog company Demvgum. Alabama 35201
,leephone 20$ B09 5060 l
A A
b l
b h
J. D. Woodard
[M([$
June 30, 1992
- "* "*""W" Docket Nos. 50-348 10 CFR 2.201 50-364 l
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 i
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Reply to Notice of Violation Report Number 50-348,364/92-13 Item Number 50-348,364/92-13-01 NRC Inspection of April 27 - May 1. 1992 Gentlemen:
This letter refers to the violation cited in the subject inspection report.
The violation states:
Amendment Numbers 93 dat.'d March 31, 1992, and 87 dated April 1, 1992, facility operating license NPF-2 and NPF-8, respectively, requires the licensee to comply with their approved Physical Security Plan.
Revision 22, dated March 13, 1990, of the Physical Security Plan (PSP), Section 2.4.1. Training / Retraining, Security Personnel, states in part, " Initial training and requalification of security personnel shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the FNP Security Personnel T&Q Plan."
I Revision 6, dated March 13, 1992, of the T&Q Plan, Section 2.2, states in part, " Security Supervision will certify.on each SNC or contractor guard's qualification and requalification record that the performance of all crucial tasks associated with his assigned duties have been successfully demonstrated that such records will contain the date of successful performance." Section 2.3, of the T&Q Plan states in part, "All Farley Nuclear Plant Security Guards will be requalified every twelve (12) nonths in accordance with-their job -
r related tasks."
Contrary to the above, security su)ervision was certifying on SNC requalification records that they and successfully demonstrated all-critical tasks associated with their assigned duties when in fact, they were not witnessing the guard demonstrated the task on the dates of performance. During 1991 and-1992, personnel were responsible for conducting annual requalification-were not requiring i
security officers to demonstrate all critical tasks as required.
This is a Security Level IV violation (Supplement. Ill).
920foho'250 920630
'yp/
PDR ADOCK 05000349 G
PDR i.--..~...
, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page two Mmission or Denial The above viol; tion occurred as described in the subject report.
Egng L [gf Vi01ation This violation was caused by personnel error in that training tasks requiring demonstrated performance were signed off based on previous obsersation rather than requiring the officers to demonstrate performance on the certific;iion date.
Corredlyffgi{on Taken and Results Achieved To alle,iate adverse condition:
The secu .y force was evaluated and it was determined that the security officers were fully qualified to perform assigned duties.
Corrective Steps to Avoid further Violations 1.
Security group examiners have received training stating they shall ensure the Training and Qualification Plan Tasks requiring
" demonstrated performance" are actually performed in their presence.
The retraining has been documented by signatures appearing on a training attendance sheet.
2.
A three-day formal training class, to be administered by the plant training staff and the security training coardinator is sche,'uled for July 8, 9, 10, 1992. All security shiit Nremen will att 3d.
A portion of the training will include "conduc?..g demonstrated performance evaluations."
3.
The Security Personnel Training and Qualification Plan will be revised to require knowledge skills to be evaluated in a written examination and performance skil'is to be evaluated through actual demonstration.
Date of Full Compliance Ju?y 31, 1992 Confirmation I affirm that this response is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. The information contained in this letter is not considered to be of a proprietary nature.
Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY Y
k JDW/SMA/EfB: map.d cc:
Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. S. T. Hoffman Mr. G. F. Maxwell l
._.