ML20101K550

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proposed Change to QA Policy,Clarifying Regulatory Controls That Apply to Changes to Licensing Documents. Marked-up Sections of QA Policy,Delineating Changes,Encl
ML20101K550
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/24/1992
From: Creel G
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9207060012
Download: ML20101K550 (8)


Text

_ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - -

s B ALTIMORC GAS AND ELECTRIC 1650 CALVERT CLIFFS PARKWAY a LUSBY, MARYLAND 20657-4702 Groact C CREEL vict PRt61 DENT nucle AR ENERQY (440)200-4465 June 24,1992 U. S. Nucle:r Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:

Document Control Desk

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Pou. r>lant Unit Nos.1 & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50 318 Pronosed Change to Ouality Assurance Poliev Gentlemen:

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3), Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BG&E) hereby requests approval of a proposed revision to the Quality Assurence (QA) Program for the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant. He proposed revision would clarify the regulatory controls that apply to changes to hcensing documents. Specifically, controls for changes to the QA Program, Operating License (including Technical Specifications), Final Safety Analysis Report, Emergency Response Plan, and Security Plan would be governed by 10 CFR Paragraph 50.54(a)(3),50.90,50.71,50.54(q),

and 50.54(p), respectively, replacing 50.59 as the currently imposed control mechanism.

We propose to change the program as shown on the attached markup. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval is requested prior to implementation of this change since it could be deemed to constitute a reduction in commitments in the QA Program description previously accepted. The QA Program is also described in Section 1.B of the Calvert Cliffs Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR).

The UFSAR is updated annually in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71.

Presently, the QA Program states under Section 1B.3, DESIGN CONTROL,that " alterations to the Operating License, the UFSAR, and the Emergency Response Plan are subject to the same controls as are alterations to changes, tests, and experiments defined in 10 CFR 50.59." Ilowever, the 50.59 change process and the 50.59 cvaluation standard (unreviewed safety question) are not always appropriate for the control of alterations to these licensing documents.

Specifically, amendments to the Operating License must be sought through the process specified in 10 CFR 50.90, applying the "no significant hazards" evaluation standard of 10 CFR 50.92. Changes to the UFSAR are controlled pursuant to 10 CFR 50.71 but may reucct inputs from a variety of sources, including safety evaluations for license amendments,50.59 safety evaluations, QA Program -

changes, and the resolution of nuclear safety issues as reflected in BG&E correspondence with the NRC. Revisions to the QA P s y are made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3), and prior NRC approval is sought when a uuction in commitment" is involved. Finally, alterations to the M,4)

W A88M M 888 6 0 6

' p g~ p c iDi M / d s d iI g

E_-

T

Docuraent Control Desk June 24,1992 Page 2 Emergency Response Plan and the Security Plan are made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q),

and 50.54(p), respectively, and prior NRC approval is sought when a " reduction in plan effectiveness" is involved.

This proposed change to the QA Policy would delete the paragraph under Section 1B.3 that presently imposes 50.59 controls on licensing docement changes. New paragraphs would be added to the policy under Section IB.6, DOCUhiENT CONTROL, to specify the proper controls for these documents.

Statements would also be added to Section 1B.2, QUALITY ASSURANCE PROOF Ahi, to further explain the change control process for the QA Policy. Finally, a minor editorini correction is being made to the first paragraph under Section 1.B.2 to delete two sentences that were incorrectly repeated in Revision 29.

Although we have determined that this change could be viewed as a reduction in a commitment previously made to the NRC, the revised QA Policy would continue to comply with the QA Program requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria 3 and 6. Changes, tests, and experiments would continue to be controlled by QA Program documents which are written to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.59, and new requirements would be added to ensure that -hanges to licensing documents are governed by the appropriate regulatory standards.

We request your approval of this change within 60 days of receipt of this letter. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Very truly yours,/

//

GCC/BShi/bsm/ dim

Attachment:

(1)

Klarked-up Quality Assurance Program Pages

- cc:

D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A. Capra, NRC D. G. hicDonald, Jr., NRC T. T. hf artin, NRC J. G. Caruso, NRC N. J. Blumberg, NRC P. R. Wilson, NRC R. I. hictean, DNR J. H. Walter, PSC i

. - - - - - -. - ~_..

-.-~

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY Revision 30

)

Manacer.Safatv and Medical Services Department 4

The Manager.SMSD, is responsible for directing the efforts of SMSD personnel involved

~

with medical examinations for CCNPP ' operators (10CFR55), Nuclear Security Officers (10CFR73), respirator users (10CFR20), and with the Fitness for Duty rule (10CFR2f) i 1B.2 OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM General Controls ne QA Program consists of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Appendix 1B, QA Policy, Quality Assurance Procedures, certain Nuclear Program Directives and their implementing _

procedures. The UFSAR Appendix 1B and QA Policy are the same document except for the wavyT changes are incorporated.i The UFSAR Appendix 1B is updated annually. Allfchanges approved during tl@ESr ire incorporated during that update, -R.. m..,

rr- -

3 ::E!:d 22:22!!"

A" cha,zca :ppr ved during 2: y:= =: :: mor::ed during $2: upd::eJ The QA Policy is

~

updated when each change is approved. (gEW The QA Policy identifies NRC regulatory requirements, industry standctds, and specific codes applicable to the eighteen criteria contained in 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. He QA Policy also-indicates action that will be taken by BG&E in response to these documents and to commitments made in the UFSAR and TSs for CCNPP.

Quality Assurance Procedures (QAPs) describe controls for the actions identified in the OhW! icy.

QAPs cover major activities related to operating a nuclear power plant, such as plant operation, plant maintenance, training, purchase ofitems and services, calibrations, etc.

Nuclear Program Directives address actions identified in UFSAR Appendix IB.- Directives identify regulatory commitments, management requirements, and assign responsibilities for each business function (i.e., design, maintenance, operations, etc.) within the BG&E Nuclear Program. As directives are written and implemented, they will systematically replace QAPs.

BG&E's OA Program for CCNPP is applied to structures, systems, components, and activities that have been designated SR because they prevent accidents or mitigate the concequences of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health or safety of the public. The QA Program is also I

applicable to designated NSR structures, systems, components, activities, and services as required by

-in regulations. Designated NSR program requirements are based on a graded approach to Quality Assutance required to meet applicable regulatory designated requirements and guidance. The level of QA Program controls placed on designated NSR items are defined in QA Program documents and/or implementing procedures. De controls from other sections of this OA Policy are selected as -

necessary to meet the particular regulations being implemented.

Controls have been established for specifying on a Quality List (Q-List) all SR structures, systems, components, and activities that are subject to the requirements of the QA Program.

The Statement of Authority, in the Quality Assurance Manual for Nuclear Power Plants, signed byL L

the Chairman of the Board, establishes the overall QA Policy of BG&E, This Statement sets the j

goal of safe and reliable operation of CCNPP; commits the Company to a QA Program designed to ensure the plant's compliance with regulatory requirements, BG&E commitments, and established i

practices for reliable plant operation; and requires every person involved in QA Program activities to comply with the provisions of the Program.

1 o

Page 12 of 55

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY Revision 30 Procedural Contnoh c

y M4 The QA Policy and revisions thereto are reviewed by Nuclear Program Managers. TheIfanager-l

~

NQAD reviews revisions to the QA Policy and recommends approval to the Vice President Nuclear Energy Division. The Vice President NED approves the QA Policy and revisions thereto.

Each Quality Assurance Procedure (QAP) is prepared by one or more of the Departments responsible for conducting the activity. The OAP and revisions thereto are reviewed by NED Managers and affected Depa-tment Managers..he Manager NOAD ensures QAP revisions are reviewed by the Quality Assurance organization and recommends approval to the Vice President-NED. The Vice President NED approves all QAPs and revisions thereto. The Manager NSSD ensures issuance of all QAPs and revisions thereto. (1) One QAP controls the distribution and revision of the QA Policy and other QAPs.

Nuclear Program Directives are prepared under the direction of the Department Manager assigned by the Vice President-NED as the Program Sponsor, Each directive and revisions thereto are reviewed by affected Department Managers. The Manager-NOAD ensures directive revisions are reviewed by the Quality Assurance organization and approval recommended to the Program Sponsor. The Program Sponsor approves the directive and revisions thereto. De Manager NSSD ensures issuance of all directives and revisions thereto.

QA Program documents ensure that:

1.

The need for special controls, processes, test equipment, tools, and skills is specified when necessary to ensure that required quality is attained in performance of the actisity.

2.

Quality is verified by inspections and tests.

3.

Personnel who perform activities affecting quality achieve and maintain suitable proficiency through appropriate training and experience.

Administrative or Technical Procedures are prepared as needed. They establish the processes used to implement directive or QAP requirements. The controls for review and issue of procedures are discussed in Sections 1B.5 and 1F.6.

Review of Onerations Procedures require that CCNPP shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the plant Us and operating license. The following organizations review plant operations to ensure that these procedures are followed:

1.

The Manager-NQAD provides independent verification that the requirements contained in the Plant's operating license, UFSAR, TSs, and plant procedures are met.

This is accomplished through quality assurance audits.

2.

De OSSRC provides independent veriScation by review'that. CCNPP is operated in accordance with established requirements. 'Be OSSRC, which functions under a written Charter approved by the Vice President Nuclear Energy Division, is composed of on site and off-site personnel knowledgeable of in-plant operations, nuclear engineering, chemistry and radiochemistry, metallurgy, radiological safety, instrumentation and control systems, mechanical and electrical systems, quality assurance, and environmental factors.

The proceedings of all meetings are documented and sent to the Vice President Nuclear Energy Division, Committee members, and others designated by the Committee Chairman.

l Page 16 of 55

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY Revision 30 3.

The on. site POSRC reviews matters pertaining to nuclear plant safety. This Committee screens subjects of potential concern to the OSSRC and performs preliminary investigations f

under the direction of the Plant General Manager. POSRC membership and functions are governed by Technical Specifications and written procedures. The results of all meetings are documented and sent to the members of the OSSRC, and others designated by the Committee Chairman.

The maintenance and repair of systems, structures, and components subject to the QA Program are performed by personnel under the direction of the General Supervisors of Electrical and Controls, Radiation Safety, and Mechanical Maintenance, according to written procedures and instructions as prepared by the maintenance force and approved as stated in QA Program documents. These Procedures:

1.

Ensure that quality.related activities, such as inspections and tests, are performed with appropriate equipment and under suitable environmental conditions.

2.

Indicate inspections and checks that must be made and records and data that must be kept.

3.

Show where independent veri 5 cations of inspections or checks should be performed by specified personnel other than those performing the work.

When necessary, non. plant Company personnel or outside contractors are brought in to supplement the plant work force. In such instances, the approval of work procedures and the tagging of equipment are coordinated by a member of the BG&E organization responsible for the performance of the work.

Controls are established in QA Program documents to ensure that materials and parts used in the repair, maintenance, and modification of SR and designated NSR portions of the plant are 5

appropriate for the service intended. Written procedures are prepared for the storage and identification of materials and parts to ensure that they do not deteriorate in storage and can be correctly identified before installation or use.

Equipment manufacturers and contractors used for the repair, maintenance, and modification of SR and designated NSR structures, systems, and componeets are required to have quality assurance programs consistent with the importance of the end-product to safety.

IB.3 DESIGN CONTROL Control Plant modiEcations described in the UFSAR and considered significant for nuclear safety are controlled by QA Program documents which are written to ensure compliance with Regulatory Guide 1,64 and 10 CFR 50.59.

A/erati s to t Op ating Ucense neludi TSs, th UFSARdnd the merge Res ePlan' ERP re su ect t the s e con, als as e alte arfons to nges,t ts, an rim ts def d n

Controls for changes, tests, and experiments conducted at CCNFP vary according to the following:

L As the item or activity affected is or is not described in the UFSAR.

2.

As the item or activity affected has been classified SR or NSR.

{

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY-Revision 30 1B.5 INSTRUCTION

S. PROCEDURE

S. AND DRAWINGS Controls delineate the sequence of actions to be performed in the preparation, review, approval, and control of instructions, procedures, and draw 1ngs.

Controls require that:

1.

Methods for complying with each of the applicable criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, must be specified in instructions, procedures, and drawings.

2.

Instructions, procedures, and drawings must specify appropriate quantitative (such as dimensions, tolerances, and operating limits) and qualitative (such as workmanship samples) acceptance criteria for verifying that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.

l l

Controls ensure that:

1.

' Die QA Policy is approved by the Vice President Nuclear Energy Division. (1) 2.

QAPs are developed by Departments responsible for conducting particular activities, reviewed by the managers of the responsible department (s) for that particular activity, and approved by the Vice President Nuclear Energy Division. (1) 3.

Nuclear Program Directives are prepared under the direction of the Department Manager assigned as the Program Sponsor. Affected Department Managers review directives and their revisions. The Manager.NQAD ensures directives are reviewed by the Quality Assurance organization and approval recommended to the Program Sponsor. The responsible Program Sponsor approves directives and their revisions. Directives are prepared, reviewed, approved, j

and periodically reviewed according to an appendix to the Nuclear Program Directives Manual.

4.

Procedures are prepared, approved, and controlled according to the Control Procedures.

Control Procedures establish review, approval, revision, change, and periodic resiew requiret:nts for applicable procedures.

If format and content requirements are not contained in Control Procedures, they shall specify the document to be used to determine format and content requirements. Control Procedures are reviewed by the Quality Assurance Organization. Other procedures are reviewed by Quality Assurance on a requested basis.

5.

Basis items added during procedure revisions or changes will be recorded. (1) 1B 6 ROCUMENT CONTROL y

v ve beerpe;stablis Require /

y the docuptentation of activities, ontrolledIy the ments to contr Proylam.

ntrollecVdocume includ. the UFSXR for CCNPP; O Prograp/ docu nts; procedur ons, an&tlrawings/

[

/

/

p QAPs are required to:

g l

1.

Establish controls to ensure that regulatory requirements and BG&E commitments will be implemented.

2.

Describe interdepartmentalinterfaces and establish controls for interdepartmental activities.

Page 22 of 55 l

4 4

i S

i i

m, e,w%pe-eeers asa%

ea y

fewhen.< &> -Me oh my a,< saiwk/ Sy os is., nar y

sba w m At tdiaA are on%6,16 es.wic car,dsme 4/4 /oexte.s<c.)&),

. _ _ _.. _ - - -,,. - -... -. _. - - -,., ~ - -,. -.... - -

_-~. - - - - - - =,

--..s

...-+- ~

4-+--.-4

~

Q1 Aby seraion.1 dre. reviewed dy NOAD pemonuelA --.- _

oWwama 3'Asy. caa&44 a res%&n3 a ~.~6A yevaws/y- -.

._.m de' 4 As A/Re.).co, Anww. Late.ses/ A Ald'6 An -.-

ap,ocovd,sevo, r6 6/he< ide,sd review.

y

-e

+. +....

.* rr m..

-se-.es>.

Eeeai<enen/s Asve Aeen edsA4had /o a&ra' Ae ohnessan o/ anAwdei suAodd' dy /de QA Royen. DARoyen esy,/,s/ka/

aoeurunk s,dasL /de tKshd; L)oedhjha.ce, hel si;y /de-a

. 7Es4sies].6pwiAs%s; 6xeyney &i,anu Ran; Saard Nan; y.

L24 BGey; poedare.s;.spe/Aca/rons; asd'se'swiys..

4

- oa'zwim/s tda see ueM41 A essee. eoy ume u#4 h

toeseso.nfzK53.

w e.

...W-.

.-g e4*'

m-

-t--

e em e-r

+

h g

M F

o'oewnc/>& uks am w,H&s A enn m,a6ssow wa toFAe sa 7/.

.- ~

s

.w.,

=

---re..-

$4 JA>'bek-+

4.W

- M M P +dWPT--N't*

Wpd'"9 " - - -

  • r

t 0

-,..ww----

. ew,-w

.-*we -

d...

.w m% w# w m,

,es se<aAons.AA_opay.. Lie,.inuap&rahae---

.:foee!/aakvs, aie em/rsfedJy bssvgneszAew.o/sscs.m---

x. wok _Lessun com,ohnsa n&hmeso.sidJanem e.n avdAe/AL5094 AAbadws /o &Grayey A.pwre #k are wn&v/Ad.'Jy 01Ayno6eammhAcLoewv/m &aree_ comp 4&ee wNL/oacksadg).-

,=.m w

e w

e dsen m /s uks_wa..ua h. k a m. & ana.a 44

/omesue -

Waee-N 4

_ e -

j g.meh

--6 me4%.e

_,m.

NfM*W WW h _

p pA m 4.yvm ye Waim u a_m.eam--_

M M

-4 M M_

  • ' UnwH - -

Am+-

_p

-_h____m-_._m._u_m__2.-2___s._._

____w.,u..L____d.-a---

- --------a c

.t

-