ML20101G685

Forwards Complete Rev 1 Text of Human Factors Engineering Itaac/Dacs

ML20101G685
Person / Time
Site:	05200001
Issue date:	05/22/1992
From:	Fox J, Ross M GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Goodman C NRC
References
NUDOCS 9206260239
Download: ML20101G685 (68)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- - - ..:J.: ,u /'/

1. C'

) t OQ N hb i O C GEAbchur Enan]y & : 000 soy-2260 ABWR Date Ch @2 To Fax No. Cwe Goooma Nic - R)*rtwr Thispageplua A pagola) From J4cx fox } Moon Ross Mais code 7n 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 Phone (408) 925 982 V FAX (408) 925-1193 or (408) 925-1687 Subject HFE DAC - Rewoa / ee Eumrs A c. G, E, F G sus N. Message /?we msa s con or res nous Car r Po.sw.wy. ro $4.s Mrp.a wA) /\\ 230000 g7 } 92ob260239 ggoggy 8 !f {DR ADOCK 0520000g -,J = ,o ~:e . ~.... _..

4, ;; ;; ,...;*f +-.*s. ,n 5/2L/92 [LARe - Mrrsueo i.s ree coneure Arws<os./ rexr (osreo r/w/n.) or res NM Irnac/04c., A.s rney caxxcairer s x i.s7: 7~w.s.scr wcomxstra ALL THE CNANCK.s f/fviouJey /MHrtsysp. THE $6%7 A C 770s).5 04MWalto MKf ro /d Co/Popd rt 1 THE Lt s r4 OF Arm cn944 cc>pc s,/'.srwso.s AND nemn r,,-zs %.

• rn us r se ' ruvecs.s.,0, ras y sse sisu.a< e eson BM&,.

s.s soo a s.s j [F TMSA4 AF6 ndy arass cuts rtons og connrar.s FxoM ras NkC.srns, resn.se esr u.r xxow so rar g wt MAY pt.s cu.s.t Ado Mr.soe.uc, A3df f 4= p.<, c ,, m m m m e, m.x.m c, s,,,. ,g

m._ _.,.~.. -.._.__._~._._.._...__.__-._m._ s p t i .t Drsft ITAAC/DAC j' e Element A - Human Factors Engineering Program Management i Ri DESIGN COMMITMENT: INSPECTIO NITESTIAN ALYSIS: DESIGN ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: Human-system interfaces (HSI) shall be To assure the integration of HFE into system

1. The HFE design team shallinclude the

t t developed, designed, and evaluated based upon development (1) a HFE D3segn Team shall be following expertise:

• l

?l I. a stn ctured top-down human factors systemi established; and (2). a HFE Prograrr Plan l .t 4 analysis and shall reflect state-of-the-art shall be estabhshed to assure the proper

a. Techrncal Project Management

] human factors orinciones using ecp@cd development, execution, oversight, and

b. Systems Engineenng l hunen S;;e.;c4._...,07Q,,d pbs.

' documentation of the human factors

c. Nuclear Eng+neering

,i t,

i The HSI shall include all operations; engineering program. d., Control and instrumentation Engineering 4 I

e. Architect Engmeenng

. l.' l. maintenance, test.' and inspection interfaces;

,i 1,

ooerations technical procedures; and training

f. Human factors needs of the main control room and remote

, g_ Ptard Operations I It Computer Systems Eiv.d,9 shutdown system functions and equipment.

i. ' Plant Procedure Development

[ Personnel Trainirg [ i

2. The Human Factors Engmeenng (HFE) l 4'

Program Plan shalt establish-f a_ Human-System Interface fHSI) 6 en and j -) ev=hr*n neitx4s and criteria which are u a-G with W HFE orac' ices and I i 'orincioles_ l rl _.tt-h The primary obgectives of the HFE Pro-t gram shall include _ at the minimum _ the

• i 9<

obeective be to develop an HSI which makes _4 possbie sate, efficient, and reliable operator i performance. a 1 ' REV.t 57tf]2 L L ..s . m

.... _. ~ .~_

g. 2: The goals of this the HFE Erogram Yrbid!

I shall bo stated in *cperator-confered* terms p pgd%she4-serve as criteria for test i! and evaluation activities. These *cperator-centered

• HFE design goals shan include:

,.r l _Ill e. The cperating team can accomplish ai! assigned tasks within system defined time [ .I and performance criteria _ m

i i

i J h The system and anocatiort of functions wis provide acceptable workload levels and ,s facilitate operator vigilance. .l l _.liiil e-The system wi!! support a high degree of operating crew " situation awareness.* i h ffy.1 d. Signal detection and event recognition 9 within the opera-l requirements will be k t tors' information processing limits and wi5 minimize the naed for operators to mentally I transform data in order to be usable. 5 _Iy.1 e-The system wiD minimize operator memory load. tvi1 + The operator interfaces will minimize the potential for operator error. 2 REV.1 S?!/92 i

M j [ ,. - i, 1 i [ i,. .? .:p ^ e n l d d e s d E n h w n d n f n f f o n e a a F a t o o a n d s l t a o e n s 4 o s d d t t c s n i n e io n e n e s s u n e a a e o it e t e i h a i r b lp o t p n e a n h

i v

r n E h o "r. u d s f lu t t s o a t s a it v g e c d n e t c e a E a d is n it n o t e F w v n i t f n a e a s o o s e o T c t i e t s c e e e v n md d i m E o s e e n

• c b

H ie t r e o h m o n 4 v d e c e F p it it c e. e e e n mh fe a H i l i a h B n a r c t v p d it r a o g t w L z u b f e e n n e i C c a n E m !a an la d a r e o d c t e v e F i n s r d a v e m tn t a n a e eiH t l a e o f t s o s a n o f o t t

d e

e t n s e m

c in e

d n h a 2 o a s 4 T m h n y g n io s mh n ito t l p g 3 t o d m e i T-n p is e, a o l f it t n t o e n "t m a MB: e t e c d a o c E ri 7 e n g r i t b i

a n c

is o a d n F u 5 i lc e u o a t e e a. s n " n e e d i% in lo p n ic n f a H d T-i r. l e r v v r r e s o - n e : r q D e 1 o e o f i r u e i yto a io f s it e s o r e e e n. s nh V t n d r c t E a r f E e e s h t o f t o a v w s t v h f i i t s s R r u F lb h e t e o a S c C c i g s n ) c o ) e e o d n H n p it c in e n t t r d ) c e in H is ) 2 n e 4 e 5 ) e B ls 7 n ) t u it i is n o e my 4 y i o a m o O e -s i d r i n c o h o i e g i ) i n e m1

p. i le t

E- ) l s h mMt e a e v i l v T p c l i v r 'c p p T e s v r s s i o i is it i o a p if a fv im t t t wf F e e y . n h s. Ar f f f e r e c r h H 1T h S c p d a p c im e t t i 3 j j

Is ' L The HFE Design Teamh hanno the es-authority and organizational freedom to accomofish its e.wis thet*H-4ts**ees+f responsibilith c ;; cat 5 :A,s aad-to J h, f, p st'am 6 ",c ' T.pk,- e-,t:So ; ci-the ?: H6Ud3swp-The team sha;l have the authority to determine where its input is required,- god 12 access work areas, and design P.. ; cLwtation. The Team shan have the authority to control further processing. deli-very, installation or use of HFE/HSt products until the disposition of a non-conformance, J.. deficiency or unsatisfactory condition has been achieved. The llZ Ceig. Tea.-- 24" l .t e( w a 8 -I e% e i o g. 4 REV.1 s?1s2

sE ,,',,.o4 j?A '4 e - s I w n h n e mw d it g o g n 2_- i E u d n is h i r g t s u u d a n a F o n is e t g n e L.__ d u _+ b s d n H h n a e d r _ s r w a ims o t n 2 s mlc t g e d s f b { a s d d s o o W,._. _ v s n

d s

i i I d c _ w e n b s s e e A n s. t s 1. n u e t e e t v Me tn o < u ls f md s s a a s o y v i e e a s l c_.- m_ t m y __m t it e mn 4 t v n m_' -w . u g u le r, n ._vi g n e c v u o a. d k io h 9 J. r it c it a o n b t _u w d in b c a -_ o a a o a e i v W r n t p-e d g h n e a a r r a n r c c = n e io p r u w a .I t o h e l t e i i t 3 w r d E s_ a mt c o e t t t s i m _.w t t i a r n a a t r - h g ic c t e a i t c n s _ n s e e e . m n e a n h h n l in e le o , s n f n N u d u t i o 2_~. . w " v i s t s 2 i e f s t e s e v m C e 9 f i a e m e ic / r. s w s i s. o t r n_ = E h . s o d le a n i t r r e s n u u e 3 e _ w ~ = t r v e g s s c y d e t t i ia s o n s_ y c a l-is lu a a it i 5 t s m_. m F r t l e c ma d _. _i H i o s a m n 1 c. w E n e t b.~. 4 6 n f o w s o V. r t mu _ n n o c D e t o d d g o t i r e r o__. s v e o n M t n n p a r t a u _ v 7 r mw _ _ n i e A n f Miam s, e o h e i d v f a a o t k s v r w r n c e s s p e t c T h h m a m =w a u n c vs e e p m w t h r u n 2_- v t r _ w 8 T m s i s a e k c e i e d a h k t g s h e t 4 i h - w v ly u c n r s e ic e c it i u v ede e e.. ~E. c v o a d lp c o D Ahwd p a a a e e r c n n m p _ y,' = i J s a o r e

1. hwf.

s y r s r e _ o a i i t 5 i!i,4. 1 ,I ' j, f .:I ,4*

1*

4 i ;,

f

• ,,%'1i i!.

i,.

jii Ii i!j' i(il'j1llli l l 4 l r

• N.

G - O I ^. ~ .l ^ s IL r S o d l e n 2 n t i a c 1 a 1' w i P f n f l o e E a e n d c F r ia o t F d m u a s l n l f H a a M h r e a a t f n d h m h S e h e n e o ia e m s ia e t t m r u r o n r e I t n e t t u l P t o a i l t m e h n c l i f we r c i e o e P c o s a W_E t d c F 3 h n R t T n d o r H r a r y a n i d S it h a a a e M t ) iu s n f c s h a n w e h s y l 2 t d e l i ) n l d a a p s r i o 'f r r ) t f e P o v R m n o h o a e e i t t c h e C u e n t f t t t i n e a a a 2 t a ) t 5 n E e d l e F m n M H is o e m e l l s r h L L L ( t m S n n E N N N 1 M a I t t n o d o V f c e t 2 h n o S c n c F n B B B E i 2 -r t e o R a H h e u d m m m R f r i h m R f r s r d e o o o i w. i m a e a e t r r r e s o m l n F F F c m. T N k r e h i ne e ( f ( t f h e t t e c s u K v n s H a e u e b s r a n 2 e o y t r c x 3 E 2 d C S w o s a c se v 6 !1Il[lI, (,!

._.m. 4-1 g. Note that within the set of documents listed above_ differences may exist recardino e.? ,.4 - soecific methods and cri!stia =*able to the f ,,e.: HFE Prooram Plan _ in sduations that such 1 .,f differences==ier all of the methods and cnteria nresented wishin those documents are P ..) i cc,64-M to be maa*=8v -acri=*a and vahd I and therefore any of the above listed [ i documents may be selected as the basis for k

_. s

s of the HFE Proaram

_f. 2: (Tier 2 criteria only) r . Criteria regarding the composition of the HFE Design Team are as presented in Attachment I f e i to the HFE ITAACOAC t _5 (Tier 2 criteria only} The HFE Proaram [ t Plan shall estabhsh-I a That nach HFE issuet-concern 4heHneels l t = c n ;;d; N :^.. 2.;:d. ;: ;. 2 2,4 i by N TE C_,. T_.. shaft be entered on the HFE Issue Trackina System tog when first } k identified, and each action taken to eliminate t F or reduce the issue / concern should be documented.. The final resolution of the P issue /concem, as @ by the HFE Design , I, i Team,'shall be documented in detail, along 4 HFE Design Team ) with information regarding p acceptance (eg., person accepting, date, etc.) 4 ,~ I* 7 NV.1 571192 l ii ? L w.-q- ..y g w-6 ie,. i >..-, e-n.

8 jl f E l d o n l e s w a k e o ie t F /- f h i n o s r s n u s it b o r r e H u n i d o e a e s n s io o i t t e m e a u d o d u h n c h n le S t t e s o n r h u s r s E i v o e i l o c H t h i t t u o F in p w lo lc s a S a a i u t t f s s f s s y e v e n a e n o c e r m fe o s r y S a e d n a d f i t H s r o c y s d t t e o d m i m i m s r a o s

c t

s o a t t i f e n s n a n a u f f s i h a e t i o s i i a g i f f x R n h t e d h c c t e n o n e F p n in o e o e k t T e ib h r o u w n e e a s n d m ic e i d

s i r

d l t r e e n e e o a n ) s h , io c n T u f i r u a r e "M @w n m a lo ) ) e n n e b mt s t r r s o lu a e e i o s e e n l s e e a t a h h u c n, m t 2 s e r s s le

r i

o e o v n t t e d i o p r t T a a L t s s o b c e it } L

i b e e e c e o

v k n -r 2 t 4-m5 h r c t L r 1 l t e F o e I r a L L N 2 l a n E c d is v M e r h e N N B 5 -, a e i t , u w a T t l 6 e id m n e e F a o e l h t t o B B e

d e g h r l

H 1 o o t o e r f c m V. D i h m m o E t t l f la e n h n d o s v mi t I f o d t e c id a h e a o n pi e i ld g e h t C S c r m u H e i o n n o o F R t n s s e T o in lb d a r r h a to s ( ( t u ( F F t n h w f k o n a s u o i m T h c is e n s H h o s h a h 2 mh n a n ) e lig e s a n r r u M e e i w s r 0 r o w T e c t d d o s i u u e e o ) 1 c wfo e n a c d i r e y if s s i w i 1 2 c t t ) 1 ic s s n o p a s ( ( ( t ) v t e o h r s f o e AD h h S i t r o d m_ T y s a e r a d a t t ( s 8 1

4 1 e 1 T }

• C I!?sfs14 A s[

.a. ql L J. i<.3i. n e_ 2 5,. 1,k, ; e # u ) o 8' g l ':E p ' ~' I $! ;ll 3 P 2 15 [ (,I > i O M B. 4 N D t a P R jE d 9 e t r 3 4, c 4 it e:: 3na p 3-e 7 E o o u f "P i$ J R i _. d ll i f 3' o 'h o e y 7 12 'l J)

• JE l

h 7- .e - o o 1 s -; L E 6' s15

• ii ;. g j

i o 6 J: Fn n <5 ( o q. n, 12 g ;d j! g ,- ~ 5 qs ') o g l q 3 ll F I, 6 TU "y .5 y 4l E ) s h, ; s e {': 'p l( W e- "e !~ l s p l4 -s 1 li ? R 42 d p e y o .5 b 13 13 i 4 o 3 - p o. N d,i: l!h l$ lfh h hN3 b h $ li b { p d[ 4 T' 5 illll. Oll j 3 $n . jt -e-e a F il 1) B. J @4-4 ir 6 .s .a .c n U $ Ji 3 2 if li.i I l 2 5 i i b d 9.h t F j i Y,l-1ll %li2 It .L, 3 t ^4 7' 7 :1 sj! i [ C l l L a 1 isff J et i: !!:; 1 2 lr o 3 d .i 3, 1 a p ll: ? s x :f p 5' .3 e b E y e o o e u e . e u. i i h E is 6 oS '!i 1 I W ,5 25 5 5. $ E .E l1 o i 4 b 4 4 4 I 4 i .I F 4

. _ - _ ~... i,: T-Tkprocedwas and-documen *ts e rqu_ s, mes4-the l'TE !ssucs Treekmg System: S.a (Tier 2 cnteria onty) The ilFE Program Management Plan shall include:-the4oHoweg- ' '. 5, a.Itgpurpose and organization of the plan b.It2gverall HFE program goals and 4 objectives i',i

c. The relationshp behveen the llFE

'. i ; program and the overall plant equipment procurement and construction program (organization and schedu'e). d. Definhion of the HFE Design Team and Ih2 r activities includina: i (i)- Description of the HFE Design Team function within the t,toader scope of the piant equipment procurement and construction pro-gram, including charts to show organizational and functional relationships, reporting r, relationships, and lines of communication; (ii)- Description of the responsitAty. .~J; authority and accountabi;ity of the HFE Design Team organization; 10 FEV.1 57182

.~ (iii) - Description of the process through which rnanagement decisions will be made p regarding HFE; es (nt) - Desenption of the process through which technscal decisions wu! be made by the HFE W Team (v)- Description of the tools and techniques (e.g, review forms, documentation) to be utilized by the HFE Design Team '.n fulidiing h, their responsibilities (vi)- Desenption of the the HFE Design Team f," staffing, job desenptions of the individual (vii)-HFE Design Team personnel and their personal qualifications and: {viil Definition of the nrocedures that will oevem the intemal n ueceineni of the HFE Desion Team _

e. De5nition cf the HFE issue Tracking System and it: imo?omontation ' cludirn:

m (i) Indtvidual HFE Design Team member responsibilites regarding HFE issue identification, logging. issue resolution, and v, issue gioseoct; .s 11 FEV.1 5"ZtB2

!l11l! ,) GE ], r...: J

h' t

d t e E S e e - s e d te -e g F H i e lp e u n r s e t t c a e s r n H u iu . E a t t e q h i e T mf a e g f l q n F h e d l e v min d e o H c h eb i r %n r it t a e l n f n a s a le t io c h ig o i t n a e t f s w ito n u e p e e n n o d h f t s t e mi c f

• e it i

t a t i f e n d n n a t u s i t n o d a t e d a a i a n < a t l-n e n n e s u o r n e mm e n i n o t e d s h u mre l s a h o n s t a d t r f e o u v d e n e o u e it r c e e e t f f o u o a ip i f t r c u s o n o u r s a i o s e d s c e s t d s e o la o o u u d is p i i s u a d le d s d p f l i I 2 e s n o u o v s o E S S d E d s a o s n E lc r e h F H i n F h. t a F n p d h H 7 t e e d r d a H d h n e g n s i H e e e 5 i f s t s a A n a n o k e lb u t e g lc f I i e g a n n i h a u n h n o e l 1 r n u n o n V. r id t e e d id s o it md t e d N i f c g ta c a a in n c a s it lu d r s k n f e n o e a t c e r i a a o lp n o g e t t s o e t e a a r e r n my o y f s it r u e mm P d d i it n r r s t f i i P e. la r s e s e n m e e a u l s n e u it ic e o ii n c u n h ic l u ) s e o t ) t t o u f i( e o c e t s o r t ( e h s c r t s e r o f ir e n t i s n n s a c p m o d o g T r i i r r i 2 1 jl

ti il

1 .. - p , e s. 'i ..tt {

• dr-s 2 c e ip r.

e e M! t h r s d do n c n d t c e d s d a n c f e s n a m a c o lp d t n p %i ic g g h d n is t t c

;e d

n e n n c t r a io m e i e a a e t xn@d y. p-t e n a t t t e D w a M a r hd it c Od ic x e < t n n iu e N f d d g, ci o e q n e t m e n a n e _, d d s f e R y a V a a -; p- ._e~M lmWl io r n t c t e c = c e i t i ic a t c t n f t s p a n n e n a r ai - mG s t o 2 n u g e ra s n r t i e o F , m e n. c S e A 5 u t d e E d g v it a 1 n e c f is e m p J c h p 'C i4 b a -

_. L u

F 2 n e m i d n o s t X- ,~ w u y s E te n 5 t . F __,d s t d {- y 4 n e o e F n la s d v a 1 ^ n n - t x. a - r. ~ n ^ e , -. s e e j-lo mt i A + o n b n e m V. l t e :. t n a T d o n a a D E d-M st r. r u f a E i) c iu t e e c R p 4-e e s -. o k mt e H n e s t s .~. @ n q 4 d e q E h r r c l a H P d H it i s u a r r C t t l u F o n e ( F c r, y A t r i E e r r. c e = : f l T a v t E F m_.'-m e on id e i) i( i( t i) ) ) d O e i F e s. a h c C i v ) c iv la v o i Miw i) v i( I lp e d dn H p F o h ( e ( ( r g~ e D P V h n o a N s H t w t t 3 1

l,Il![

tlltl

i ?, = A._Debiton of HFE program rndestones h incladinn: (i) identification of HFE rrstestones at which evaluations of the effectiveness of the HFE effort are to can be made, and the relation-ship of the milestones to the integrated plant constmction sequence of events; (is) A program schedule of HFE tasks which f,' addresses the relationstnps between HFE + elements and activitres, the deveicpment of HFE reports and the conduct of HFE revews. Bud (iu) Identification of other plant equipment ~ procurement and construction activitms wit:h are rotated to HFE Design Team activities but outs'de the scope of the team (e.g., Cal equipment manufacturel _tth DeEnMon of HFE documentation recuirements ansi (0 't.N!ication-of procedures for retention and retrieval. and L i 14 RV.1 S2L'92

!t L (ilt ,!I , ]. i t[ j..l:l,.'e In. i

l!

Li b! ,a t I IL l .+? T, 1 d e

• e g

e t p 3 r. h: p,. [e** 8t. i e O ,4 ~ 4 h c d e ih n e b w a h t e y h n le a r n n n o w t i h o r n r f m e o h e it t t s w u e m e r ic M h b e h r g a p w sd s m i e. e e wiv e n r t wl e a p o i e R s i c t E h s o e o -e a t t Ah t F r s n f n t H o e s r e n m Mg e a d m 2 t n a n 8 r m o e k e s! id a 1 h I u o o lp 2 r p a h w m i 1 m 5 l o g c w o a c e o i n c s r t fo o n V. e ir S a D md s r d g E e e e lo s - M a t i R n t o c c r e ) r a it m e c a n t 4 g in a r a n d %m( o o t e P o iz n m r c m W -u a c o ia s n o r n e E . g b t f -} q F m r e r u e y jr H c o s p ms 5 1

i..

j i 2

4

7 A*ITACHMENT_1 TO HFE ITAAC/DAC I (TIER 2 CRITERIA ONIX) HFE DESIGN TEAM COMPOSITION (1) The composition of the Human Factor Engineering (HFE) Design Team shall include, as a minimum, the technical skills presented in Article (4), below. (2) The education and related professional experience of the HFE Design Team personnel shall satisfy the minimum personal qualification requirements 3 i specified in Article (4), below, for cach of the areas of required skills. In those skill areas where related professional experience is specified, qualifying ) experience of the indhidual HFE Design Team personnel shall include j experience in the technologies and techniques, of the particular skill area, utilized in the ABWR, main control room and remote shutdown system j Human System Interface (HSI) designs and design implementation acthitics. i j The required professional experience presented in those personal qualifications of Article (O are to be satisfied by the HFE De:ign Team as a collective whole. Therefore, satisfaction of the professional experience requirements associated with a particular skill area may be realized through the combination of the j professional experience of two or more members of the HFE Design Team who esch, individually, satisfy the other defined credentials of the particular skill l area but who do not possess all of the specified professional experience. Similarly, an individual member of the HFE Design Team may possess all of i the credentials sufHcient to satisfy the life Design Team qualification requirements for two or more of the defined skill areas. (3) Alternative per.sonal credentials may be accepted as the basis for satisfying the minimum personal qualification requirements specified in / tticle (4) celow. l Acceptance of such altemative personal credentials shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and appreved, documented and retained in auditable plant con-struction files by the COL Applicant. The following factors are examples of alternative credentials which are considered acceptable. (A) A Professional Engineer's license in the required skill area may be substituted for the required Bachelor's degree. TABII 18.E.t.1 MMis en 1 REV.1 5/21/92

n a er.- 2; ] (B) S u ecessful-com pletion-of-all-teelmical-po rdonwf-ateen gin eering3 5 technology 4>r-rela ted-seien ce-cellege <legr eequeg r anemayhe-+ubstitu ted for4he Bachelor 4-degree--The-coursesshall-be-in-eppropriate-technical subjec ter eleva n t ao ahe-r equirchkill-tucas-of-the-H F E-Design-Te am-for whieh-the-individual-will-be-re+ponsible, J 4 IIn(G)Related experience may substitute for education at the rate of six semester credit hours for each year of experience up to a maximum of 60 hours credit. LCl(D)Where course work is related to job assignments, post seconuary educa-tion may be substituted for experience at the rate of two years of education I for one year experience. Total credit for post secondr; education shall l not exceed two years experience credit. ? (4) Reautred Skill Area Personal Qualification (A) Technical Project Management (A) Bachelor's degree, and five years experience in nuclear power plant design or operations, and three years management experience I (B) Systems Ergii;eering (B) - Bachelor's of Science degree, and four years cumulative experience in at least three of the following areas of systems engineering; design, develop-ment, integration, operation, and test and evaluation TAB 1118U.1 MMIS.en 2 REV.1 5/21/92 ...m. ,9 w -~-g - - < - ~ - - .,,,-------m v-+y--y--- ueu--c e m et

n .;.. _ ::..c - .. n m-- ~ - 1: . : c. r.. ....t ..: n

t. :. :r

\\ 1 l L, (C) Nuclear Engineering (C) - Bachebr's of Science degree, 4 and - four years nuclear design, 4 I developmen~, test or operations l experience (D) Control and Instrumentation (D) - Bachelor's of Science degree, (C&I) Engineering and - four years experience in design of proces. control systems, and - experience in at least one of the l following areas of C&I engineering; development, i power plant operations, and test and evaluadon i l E) Architect Engineering E) - Bachelor's of Science degree, 4 and - four years power plant control room design experience i

l i

Tant.E 18.r,u Muis:en 3 REV 1 5/21/92 1 4 - .I

~ -

7.. :

a... :. ::

.... :.~:.: c.-

c :...,:. :: i i 'r l (F) Human Factors (0 Bachelor's degree in human factors engineering, j engineering psychology or related science, and - four years cumulative f experience related to the .i human factors aspects of human-computer interfaces. Qualifying experience shall include expcrience in at lease two of the following human factors related activities, design, development, and test and i evaluation, and - four years cumulative experience related to the i i human factors field of \\ crgonomics. Again, qualifying experience shall u include experience in at least 4 two of the fellowing areas of 4 human factors activities; design, development, and test and evaluation i 1 4 t I 1 TAB 111 R.2.1 m uSn

4 LEV.1 5/21/92

. '7... ; ^ i 1 4 i (G) Plant Operations (G) - Have or have held a Senior Reactor Operator license, and - two years experience in !!WR nuclear power plant operations 1 (H) Computer System Engineering (H) Bachelor's degtee in Electrical J Engineering or Computer I Science, or graduate degree in ) other engineering discipline (e.g., Mechanical Engineering i or Chemical Engineering), 2 and - four years experience in the t design of digital computer 2 I systems and real time systems i applications I) Plant Procedure Development i (I) - bachelor's degree, and four years experience in developing nuc! car power plant operating procedures ) (J) Personnel Training g) - Eachelor's degree, and - four years experience in the development of personnel training programs for power 4 I plants, and - experience in the application of systematic training develop-ment methods l l i TABLE 18.E.U MhHS en 5-REV.1 5/21/92

t ITAAC/DAC

l Element C - System Functional Requirements Analysis

[' l '.1 DESIGN COMMITMENT: INSPECT!ON/) EST/AN ALYSIS: DESIGN ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: .s. ..o System requirements shall be analyzed to - A System Functional Requirements Analysis identify those functions which must be implementation Plan shall be devekyped to performed to satisfy the objectives of each sssure that the analysis is conducted according

1. The System Functional Requirements functional area. System function analysis to accepted HFE principles.

Analysis implementation Plan shan establish: that-: shall: (1) determine tne objective, b performance requirements, and constraints of - An analysis of system functional the design; and (2) establish the functions requirements shall be conducted in accordance

a. Methods and criteria for conductino the

,t which must be accomplished to meet the with the System Functional Requirements System Functional Recuirements Analysis f,- objectives and required performance. Analysis implementation Plan arx! the findings which are mnsistent with acceotad HFE will be documented in System Functional cractices and crincinfes. Requirements Analysis Results Report. t s _tLa. That system requirements shall define - The analyses of the system functional the system functions and those system reouirements shall be reviewed by the HFE functions shall provide the basis for Design Team and shall be documented in determining the assocated human and system l System Functional Requirements Amfysis performance requirements. Evaluation Report. Ab. that critical functions shall be defined (i.e., those functions required to achieve j major system performance requirements; or those functions which, if failed, could pose a i safety hazard to plant personnel or to the general public), L4 1 Tkv.1521.T

f; ll [i[n(i

[; sit ! !

tLiilLi! !!t[!; 1, i i ; > l, 2. c : .{

e' 2

e g 3 r y ll t l a d s - l f s h o d la h p n l 1 e e n d a o iws 5 l o t l is 2 d my it it ie b h n c i s e ib it ie d o n f t r e o s o s h d a a it e 1 mh c f eg n t in g" c c la c n r it e e e s c r n wif h r t n s n v d n e ic o a e u i e e imt d h r e n t e a d d b d cir o r f r p o i ie mfu h p T t id ip e s h e h e e n b ma e o it e n wl j t h k a w c g ic c c r f p it t if rc a a i h a d s is n a i a.g e s n a a r ir n s c d s n t j r r e b n b e n d a e s g it e c e y a e e o migc . p s r r n a r p m e ia r s a s e d d a n e c e d id s E ib l o i e la it f t it i . o e l r e c o f t s e e e l h a la d m me y s s ito s e n h a c mn t t l b n y e n o p s a e s e s u r t f v e e a f c p e e r l a s b it r e o r o v le d s e it s r la f r i l lj n m g o a o s a ) n e b lb la e la n v f e r h t l d p s c e u o a r it i s a ia a a o n h t i t h h c it t h h t u i c e n r t s s h u e t t r e me a a h n a e a l t c h n a s F t o d n e a t f i r g b s s s e n s o o p n e is d a l n la t t j u n m s e r e n s e s a a o u r w d r t o d n e u o c o e e in e ms le o o e ie v m f mie g n e mt s e o ia d d it r o e n n t f o c a o mv g f f d f t f r y it t f i i e c n s e it s e e l d te c y c iu u r r t n e n n n s t n s t s s r v e e p a it id o s f t o e b f a u n e q F q l t u n e u e iu n d le n r e e y l r t s f y u c a h in y e a d u ih e l o s a ( t f e n wt f q e t r r t y e t n n e d s o a n a u b s a t e n a v io f l e e a p n t mia it o w a a r l e g h a s t. e l h r r a n h a o ' c p d n s it ig p t iL. dtc t i l u ic f e o r l f s c r t. gd e d miu f n n la p d

o. d n e a t

l v n o e q e Abe u o h e 1a Ae n o y a n n lib e a e n n g s s o in o f c s i i t l t i l 2 4

i,;]

ij}<i

;tji I

l 4;;' . i i'*lj l4l'!i: j ;

d (control process and performance measures S~ required to achieve the function), functional {,- operations (including detecting signals, meas-uring information, comparing one measure-ment with another, processing information, and acting upon decisions to produce a desired l; condition or result such as a system or com-ponent operation actuation or trip) outputs, feedback (how to determine correct discharge M l of function), anc* interface requirements from

,j

.i the top down so that subfunctions are recoo. fl..; nized as part of larger functional elements. LL The system functional requirements l analyses shall be conducted in amordance with the requirements of the Human Factors i Engineering Program Plan and the System i, Functional Requirements Analysis [ implementation Plan. i

3. (Tier 2 criteria oniv) The system func-tional recuirements analyses methods and criteria establishad in the System Functional Recuirements Analysis imolementation Plan sha!I ha consistent with acceoted HFE methods

{ and criteria. Within the context of system -_,t functional reouirements analysis. accected ';:j HFE methods and criteria are cresented in the

l 1

followino documents; 3 Tkv.1 setw 4

4 F I t-i j-t

a. (From BNL taterl

' y,; 4 i ts ts

b. (Fron WIL_later) i to i

= ..z. i;,i i) I = I .. t, "t o. r 1 1-t t

x. (From BNL later)

!;i ) Note that within the set of documents listed I above. differences may exist reaardirr the .] f specific methods and criteria anoticable tc the t conduct of Wstem functonal reauirements d i f P . analysis. In situations that such differences d I exist. n of the methods and criteria i oresented within those documents are i r i con <Wred to be eoualle ---uwiate and valid l 1 i i. and. therefore_ any of the above listed documents may be selected as the basis for the system functional reoidrements analysis. i [, I i .r t 4 t

• i

.'[ i.I' .s; i 4 I i-4 Rer,1521/92 i r k,. ~ e

' mgntatior* Plan s, y .: I 4o1 Tier 2 criteria only) The System . l s Functional Requirements Analysis ,) implementation Plan shall include: l

a. The methods for identification of system

'.I level functions based upon system performance requirements I h

b. The methods for developing graphic function descriptions (e.g., Functional Row fl Block Diagrams and Time Line Diagrams)

c. The method for developing detailed function narrative descriptions which encompass:

{jl observable parameters that indicate system status, {iil control process and-measureLdata seguired to achieve the function, and fliilhow to determine the manner in which proper discharge of function is to be t etermined i e Rev. t s2tm 5

- _. ~. - -.... -, - -..- -.... = -

d. Analysis methods which define the

!.1 integration of closely related subfunctions so n' that they can be treated as a unit

e. Analysis methods which divide identified subfanctions into two groups according to whether:

'(i) Common achievement of the subfunction '} ' is an essential condition for the accomplishment of a higher fl' level function, or (ii) The subfunction is an alternative sup-porting functions to a higher level function or the subfunction's accomplishment is not nece-ssarily a requisite for a higher level function.

f. Requirements to identify for each integrated cublunction:

i (i). The basis for why accomplishment of the subfunction i is required, (ii) The control actions recessary for r, accomplishment of the subfunctions, [ (iii) The parameters necessary for the ..i subfunction control actions, h (iv) The criteria for evaluating the result Y of the subfunction control actions, 6 nev.1 Gr?1f32

5' e (v) The parameters necessary for evaluation e of the subfunction (vi) The evaluation criteria to t .> sed to evaluate the subfunction, and l (vii).The criteria for selecting si!!crnative function assignments if the evaluation criteria is not satisfied. +1 ?. ' 53- (Tier 2 criteria only) The results of the system functional requirements analyses shall be documented in a report that includes the following:

a. Objectives of the system functional requirements analyses

b. Description of the methods employed in the "r.: duct of system functional requirements analyses e

es-

c. Identification of any deviations from the System Functional Requirements' Analysis implementation Plan 7

Rev.1521.92 ~

d. Presentation and discussion of the results j'

of the system functional requirements analysis including discussion of any design change recommendations derived from these analyses and/or negative implications that the current design may have on safe plant operations

c. Conclusions regarding the conduct of the analyses and the analysis results H F E-Desie rr-Tea m-Evalua tion-Repo r t

},' i', ; L4- { Tier 2 criteria only) The results of the HFE Design Team's evaluation of the conduct and results of the system functional require-ments analyses shall be documented in a report that includes the following: I l

a. The methods and procedures used by the HFE Design Team in their review of the l

system functional requirements analyses,

b. The HFE Design Team's evaluation of the completed system functional requirements

'I analyses including evaluation of the.com-pliance with the System Functional Require-ments Analysis impicmentation Plan, and

c. Presentation and discussion of the HFE I'

I Design Team's Review firvings. 8 Rev.15l21G2

n.*i i y t[i d,y~i! } e ?; i ef i- / i-t r[ ;lt, Ii[;j j [! , : ;. ?,, 7'?.j ~_ o. .,l

t;

.r 9 E,.. s i 8 e la f n l. lls e h i t e e k n g n c s ia e n n o s n o ia f P t n n i h o y a != m n h o t t s .f r te m n os i t s o tu n r o i e a o t t c it u w n e p b r d m s f a c d r o e d e y n e t u t e n f s f n p r t e e e o s t x r e e is l d s a s s a a a e a m s e m i n y t o n mb b s e lp t n n r s t 2 s e e h s c a e e a 9 t t r r n m e n c le m s c e / r t t i m t y e p r o a o e e n n it s . n o 2 1 C e o i e d s in u n i f m t f / f o n o e o 5 n a y d e f s : r n n e c io c t s e r o r a a r c it t y i e c t f z iu n i d s t o c i d e 1 n n n h o y q it it o p e i l oi N a u e i s a e d lt r c e b r e a t u a e la t F d h n a n r I tc u c a p l r q R r p n w u s o s b a p llo R e e e f e c p e o a n a. y, b r p e n o s r c n ml r a h t n s i d . u n t c o - d i o a l m t e rh e e e s it h o a E n la A it r r s n n r e h m n s t iu . e o a is h c F a o h o s t c lb e B H o n n q t f a m a a s r u t e it e a e e e h s o t r l d h n p d h le a s m n l t t r e g A s ) p m e t n t T e e e n e T io p Q ) n-) o mit iu l i h o a e a c o . i a c n r o t s h e d { e T ll T it n e h t At t s h n c a. i m p d n @{ i q s w {). f n D . S a u c f y i e e u x y a h. d h e C s a o s r o t f i tc s e n n n is b s o f iw y l i o e u l t t u a F n n b l a o R o s a l s c f a g n h e a n lo t o in A s r l f P a o h it Co n c s d n n e A o o g n o o h An ie a in n a i it id d a t n p o c f c o s d it lA c lo e n n n in Di t e r e n h u u a m /a s e h t n t f F md t u e d f Cc y mt e r f Alo la le a a h n f o a t t a o f .n e n h o h o T e t. d n p i r c io t n is it n t r m e t n i l e AlA A a s m o w P y a g u p T- / u u t c c e 1 a n s d s c c a e n n lo is o R I s o s e d t i a n D s c o le lo n io A !n D n t e o e n o c ip la a ta n e E b it t t n T u s c d t a h F la u n e r n t H l a / F d i e s e is i h o e n f f r o p p c mi o h l t c mn a e s d t l io lo s f y E o a e e r s h v-e o n la F s n p n p s y i o o e t w E l e t i t v e n E c t e n H is i m e o la y e c d a y d b a i v d e m H d e i e n e a n u s n e r c t o n d o c w a u p lA b io s p a u it o lt a l t n t c e d c u e i h F e t R n n n d s h n n a n r A o u e e T e f f t v i A h u ca c F b H o o s f r s h-n n g o f a e o u h m i 1 t f o y s t u a j g n r t h L it t h i W o o t n o f s o l A a d a o m n n s n M h e ib io a a t t . t e m e s md eW c r m y o e n a u s t e d . c n u n h f fo p b b e le m e o y r n n e m t u R o e o a F e n s le f t n h H m o y o t it il

s z

s s s m n u r - i M a c e l . h a e e-c it o p e d m la a r W ll t o n n l p a f< o n a t i - c s c t o m e h io d n e s s.d u r o w 6 f v e h m h ic v T h a o h d p s f i .lb 1 o n w it n i n d w a r n a d C a e e d u a 4 n t n te a a f c e s r a h s g s e n ru n t ig l n a s h 9 e n e t it t cu a e b s ic g e a a c m.l n r m e e l f a t o e D o u s l h r h a l le s t a ~ . T h s T I ii4 4

1 4

l

l;'

I i4 j!i

, ",.i: { 9 5; E i;.'

;4 f

~ d f d a o f s to o t f n o o d s n e t a t d n a is c x d e n s l d n s a i h c e n m e e a e n n la r r t a t e a e n u e n b e la P i n h i t o s c s n Mn l h iu a a b a n si r d R m P n c a t c e o ly o a a i c d e o d d_ w e ii a a s o mi t n n r r n h c

a o k a

n e s t t n a p it r t s q L e n w r n s a o e e g s c t o e k u w s r o d n e c t ih o 2 la h s it u s t m o u i E t'o 9 y e P e h F d i W r n a s e a h lp e f o d. t l s u n F / t t f t it e a r n n t g o l h m o n e a h i n e_ e lo n i r e p e la o w e im m o wc f e 2 1 a t n r n t r t s d h o a o c / r s n n it r a, e mf t e e e 5 i m i p o p iv r e r b h b t n r e s h 1 a n n t e c c o T a t ll i e d 1 it c n ig t e ig it e u f c c o a i c t n c e N. r o o y g lb l !o n c n M n s o a n I o h ) f c d c f r i n a E n n c i a e !a d ) } ) n e a e i t n r s u n A l n d n s e a e e R n a r t r i F o io b h m v a r a p n n e P o n i c o e M s t t r ta ll s o ia c r c a n n 2 a s a L L ta e o o t r i f i h r a i a n I c s c c s it o r t n t t r e L h b e n e le s f in F o i i 6 c e c e N N N a e n t s s a m

a s

la 1 lo c l a B B D o r p u it r 2 d n c d ) la it f s m m m y c e c a e r s i s g e e a a 2 h e f h e n h u n t c e n a m h n o o o t r s i u u fb i G e m e o i i F F F o l r r r T d A n w n r e e re a T c t c . d H A T b le d E d c it m m a l . c l ( ( r ( a o n F n i a b u m x. c n c. 5 n e e t o e, e e w c s m u H u o h h e i f r o r h a o d p e le t a 2 c t t 3 f f i tcnuF f Co An Dio /t a Cc Alo AlA T-2 I D tne me lE

1," l,g" ,l i ,i <*

j I.

f9[. [o. a. i y f a' _r h e -{ y 7L O 8

_ }

~ - e n o s is r s b o v n t n n id ia f n e d d y r s o s a g a e n b n t o a a a o n n la ito it h m it u it r e c e h b t t j e d c F c a c r j s n s m l u ie f d e e lo a h g g u s sy a [ t t a d ic i d n e s y n u s e o n s r a la a n w f e n o s f s o i d n r m e n a y iu n v o t t t x i o c a o e a u it is la q o e d it i h o a l e e c r s n e i u h n c a t t r s c e s n i 2 e s s e a a t h it v u u t r e o g c d n n it t n e s e u b n r t t t l e n n o u a e c t o n m. c ia d i lo f e h e d c e u u e io a i f t r b e 9 r d c A d d o m n / a e a v t I t u o e h e r a s c v p o i io 1 c i l, n t r i d e lc u c e o it n o t t t t 2 s v a i lo r n a m a o s o n h n d !R c a / o d d i f m u 5 i. o o c l c T a n o i t d r u r t e c la s n

g o id la c

e 1 a k a l t r c e e la o o i c l h a v ) l t j n t f i t r e e f b u o t a s o n l o r ln h it in f u a y o v y r e t r i H i l b f s o N e n i iw o e i s o s a e t h a a n d i f n f s t a s t u s n o c e n o u o e o E s ix ir f s a s l bia y a o it n d h u R e l t a u u t f t d t e t x o e e h a a n f f n n n w r i m d u n e o y h d h e e it s e e f t t d b n t P n c f f e e t e f u o o e o t a i n m c m e m y r lo o r c e t b o e n t" r c o ml n n a c n i b p h c n o o p e p f t n n h a n s it it lo h le i s le i n e s a s a 2 it o g o t t t o n i t n a s n w s f r a d re n b o it e i a e n v t E i n a o e t e a f r m d i rT e n u v n v t n i t o e a id i mfe la e i e c it D s o e h nd i i p a c s s f _ e r s n e e D v D e D le f m d o e ( t t e o s d a t r s e a r a e l h ly D i f t o e E u D iu s e c c h e u i) s c ) 1 lp h 9 r e t f ) e i) p o i o lo i c v a c 1 n e le r m o b o h i( i i r l ( a o t o N d g a s C c 1 s a LI a. r q i( t id eL n u D o h n a ( a f f t t f f i tcn a i F f Co An o Dit /a Cc Ao H A A T-3 I D tn e m e lE jilIljl f l I i i >4 j4

ii) f 'l l\\ i E5

2l E

.; f' r - . s n e t s e n io h a n s fo h o ly r o t t t a m t i r o s f a t o c o n o s it f e s n c e a n d t u i n s e n io p o n r s h t r a f e v e o s n y e a a t . A s s d u f ly r h s d li.. t p e h p e o f n n s e u u e o h h in e b h in a i s t e is ir ip a e h s c v t i t is a e s y s r n f e d t v p o g d e n o t m iv e i i is a y s o d n e !a m d d f y r v mf s i t i e o y a g s iml t e p c a u its mla e n e s t it o n r h - i o it s t u o d n n e e d t n a y n e n o n e it u e c p s f l t l 7 d v a n 2 f r a b a d la e b e lt s o u it s m o m n n s o 9 s a la o c e e u ll a a a e :-- o n n c d g n l a lt o n c / t t o n c s a t e n u s lla e 1 e o n d r E-ia o n n e o e 1 t l i 2 s h i i d o d t h d io o e n e t h b; i P is e n h a d n d t m g T / t r o n e t v s s n e o f a h n u e m y v g 5 a t h o c d h io lp e ) b n n e a d it is ly g c e r o c s m r a n t a t t lo n e s c e s la e t t c m R ln a w mn y a o a h t i y i 1 e b m n m n R i u d d a c r y r . V. j f t v n e o h ll h h id e d a d m g lt n n e o a a t a n h e u t l e o e e a f l e m it sE r / h M a s n o h o h la t !r e is e o o u e R o n o m a n f e n n n t s o t t t i s f r u t f f e o g a g s t f r o f s c o u o n lp io it n it n n s e e o e n s it f e y h m c s u R n id r t s n e a a s is n t o n r n n s f u ito v i c la e o h i m t t c h e e o o a p u it a s e s id n t ir o ic n n lo c s d is 2 n s a I t la is a r i i r d iv it t i b p n ly e o a e e g i g it ia in n it e e - o lc b e u n r it d e c C t u s f in v f o e g a n y f c it it s n e lc la n r f a n u e c v n f a s e e g l i t n n e i e it r n r t r e s D n o s T i n d u P j s c e c e o e u o n r D a D c a s r i ( t u t p v a a ) lu p y c i) c r . c i O D d d n F c s I v n mla d iv le o a 3 lo a . b o c d u h h e. d v a i) y e e t . n n n h1 la t c o f c n h a f ( v ( o o n n ( e n t t a a o e c c a a s i i tc nu F f Co Aa Dio t /a Cc Alo AlA T-4 I D tne me lE IlfI Itl' I'

i i i ( 3 I. ' ITAAC/DAC t, J Element D - Allocation of Function i, ; HFE De-!en-Team-Ev !eM!en-Hooort e,, L A (r.or 2 criteria ony) The results of the HFE ,.t Dasign Team's evaluaton of the conduct and results of the function allocation analyses shall be documented in a reports that includes the following: j s.s

a. The methods and procedures used by the HFE

., j f.9 l Design Team in their review of the function allocation e analyses.

• j

b. The llFE 99 sign Team's evaluation of the l',

4 completed function allocation analyses including an evaluation of the compliance with the Allocation of Function Implementation Plan.

c. Presentation and discussion of the HFE Design j

i Team's review f.ndings. L k I l .t i h = 1 4 i a ' t

• t t

te 4 4 ^* 4 t 3 k '5 REV.1 5/21/92 r I m

I IT A AC/D AC Element E - Task Analysis DESIGN COMMITMENT: INS PE CTIO N/T EST/AN A LY SIS: DESIGN ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: Task analysis shall be conducted and used A Task Analysis implementation Plan shall be

1. The Task Analysis Implen.entation Plan shall to idoniify the behavioral requirements of the developed to assure that the analysis is conducted establis5: -thee.

a_ The methods and critoria for conduct cf the (*,' tasks the personnel subsystem is required to per-according to accepted HFE principles. task analyses which are consistent with accooigd form in order to achieve the functions allocated to HFE oractices and orinciofes. them. A task shall be a group of activities that - An analysis of tasks shall be conducted in N have a common pumoso, oiton occurring in tem-accordance with the Task Analysis

L -e. The scope of the task analysis which shall poral proximity, and which utilize the same dis-Implementation Plan and the findings wili be include all operations performed at the operator

[ B plays and controls. The rask analysis shalt: documented in a Task Analysis Results Report. interface in the main control room and at the 'l ' 1 remote shutdown system. meintsnance, test-e4 A g, -amprovidewm of-the-bases foreeking desgn decisena (e;g;-determining-before-equ+pment The task analyses shall be reviewed by the HFE mspection tasks: The analyses shall be directed D maeuteeture-le-the-extent-praetechb, whether Design Team and the results of that review shall to the full range of plant operating modes, system-performance requirements-can bc mot-by be documented in a Task Analysis Eva!uation including startup, normal operations, abnormal operations, transient conditions, low power and combme tiens-of-enticipated-equipment.-end Report. shutdown conditions. The analyses shall alsn personnel); address ooerator interface coerations durina a,4 be used to maintain human performance oeriods of maintenance test and insooction of requirements within human capabilities, olant systems and ecuipment and of the HS1 IL e: be used as an input for developing personnel DnuipmenL kid; :ssh; shiil, personnel training, and system communica-L b: That the analysis shall link the identified and tion requirements and as an input to the evalua-described tasks in operational sequence diagrams. tion of established plant operations control room A-review-ef lhe task descriptions and opera-r, staffir'g levels, and tional sequence diagrams shall be used3 identify & 6. form the basis for specifying the which tasks een-bs cenidsred-319.

• critical" in requirements for the displays, data processing I '

terms of importance for function achievement, and controls needed to carry out tasks. !O potential for human error, and impact of task failure. Human actions which are found to affect REV.1 Sr21S2 1 L

plant risk in PRA sensitivity analyses shall also j' be considered critical." Where-critieel-functions ere eutemated-the andcoco shelf-con 9+a essee,eted-humamtasks-such-es the-monitorino-ef Dutometad sn'civ sv;to n-coeratiert-nnd-the i executiert-of-beck +D-eetion9-by -the-coeratof-il the-outemated functon fah. d, e; Task analysis shat! begin with the i development of detailed narratrvo descriptions of the personnel activities required for successful ,,4 completion of the tasn. Task analyses sha!! define

r, '

the input, process, and output required by and of p, ' personnel.

g. -& The task analysis shall be in detail Suh

-] ficient enough to identify informat en and control requirements to-eneth-spoe+feation-of-tietailed such that requiroments for alarms, displays, data processing, and controls for human task accom-plishment may be soecified. L e-The task analysis results shall be made availabio as-provide input to the personnel training programs. 2.5-The task anaivses shall be conducted in r accordance with the reavirements of the Human Factors Encincorino Procram Plan and the Task Analysis Imolementation Plan _ i 2 REV.1 5/21/32

j' 4.' .. ?, I'. E ,4 4 2c i d h k a e c s e e o s r n u e e e b d i d a r r o h n a o s i d t t o w s n e e a c i r c r s h a o i d e a t e y s a is e i c i l o o n e n t s i e t r n h m is s h h h d o s l S t 2 y e m s n c m t t s y i r i t la t s r s a d y n e l t o c 1 t A h a r s t i t n a 2 s n c f o s r a e n / a t n e d a 5 r n d s h a e le i d a t ta o d m k a o D n n e a b r s i 1 u h l u k a l k E m m o a i t n s t a c s V i f t o s u e k T b s F d u c r v o a E s e e a t d i a I m m d R d a H o c o t t o n e t x T e o d e h o e t d s o u n d h h s t e c a e t t n e n e f x h o t o o m o o e a s t e i o t i t s r fa m c i t i is f l f n d t ) y r e E w e a i l o e ia v h o y e r in s o c e F o t r s s c a l s m c v f h ) r r a H l l ) o o i e e e e c n l o o n e r t l r r s a h a o t t r b a t h s a a l o m n f d t i P i i d o a b r e e la la la t e r h n c n k ts n n e w i o N N o h L L L i n a s i i a e e t o t a x h h h t n h e t o i W f t t ir t y t t s e i l s 2 i t a i B B B it t r c it r c n a a e c w e d E w l f s a o f o F a f t i h e d u t r i s d m m m s n o a d H c e c y t e n d s r e e n e t g s o o o ie i n t h n a e { t f m r r r r e m o e T c o ip is n ( f f t t f e e c o n ly e ( ( e c c r e v t e s b e c o f t d e i a g b s t b ig d d c o i c e r f m n n L a o f u i r o o o f ~ x r r N a 3 I a a o a D t f s m 3

._m _. ~.. t f lmplementation-Plen l: L E fTier 2 critoria on!v) The Task Analysis implementation Plan shall include address: e a_ The methods and data sourcos to be used in the conduct of the task analysis

b. The methods for conducting the initial (high level) task analysis including:

2', l (i) converting functions to tasks, (ii) developing narrative task descriptions, (iii) Developing the basic statement of the task functions, (iv) Decomposition of tasks to individual activities. add (v) development of Qporational sequenco diagrams l' 4 0 4 REV.1 5/2W2

l l

. [ I k s r k s n e, y e s n a / o v c id d p a o f ) t is i e.. e o t a s le en it r ic le i( t e r n a o p u o p l k k n e k n e s c c s la ll c a f e L S o c s r n a s d, n r t r a a t r s o n e r b 2 t fo e . o e e e t n, a n s e v a d n / s 9 d in u e. it n o / c i a a e m i c io r d b h e e e m o p e 1 e o 2 t t t d c n c p e e ( y f it l . n ib n v e s iu o lo / ) u g e s l mh n e a a a v n c 5 ia s t e. i t t f o v a r r o a . a e a f 1 d i( d e e m l e. u e e e b n n q h s d ir i( f a o V f g s lc ia me o o e y t i y n t t N t o i n n s, it ) r c h imd a e ip e in v e h t s y r t e d n y o s t c , e e u e s n q o o d le e n it l b lo mh - iu n e 'a m b u a wl n n a s s e u n e a t a e s q n k m q e s e r a o e is r o m e r d n v e iu e a h e e d i r c s e it mt c o t t ) f n r e r d a e ic it r f t t o n a a c e r d d q a d e m n a d s s n, e i r ip n u iu a g s e h e p p c o s q e r t o a r e r i b i4 n e e m o e u it o k e t t e r k e s p q c s r a f n u a e f e b e b a iu a t r s o e a n k ic t d h io c n s a ml h i a d e t f t t e - b t y o n e c d b o e o s a x d n a f s n a m a i e q n e o b o o t h m n is s n b r b e t a r e s t r o a o p e s o r n o y ir d o e n t i r n b ) f ) c p o , b n o o e e o o m it f t o e u s e e % 4io s t e m c d q e p i d n e it n t d o n f k a n il e n n e e n o d t a ip s e e it b a r r s r r e h ir iu i i( a o a i( c it r e c o b lu ir r r r v i io e u io a iu k r ) m m v i T c i( ) a i) u i) t t t s q i s s m q a q s le i( q t r e e e b o e a e e r . d r in h d a p e a f r t e c t r 5

(v) personnel workload (i.e., both cognitive and physical workload and the estimation of the level of difficulty associated with a particular workload condition, 3 (vii) any associated task support requirements (i.e., special/ protective clothing, job aids or ref-erence materials required. any tools and equip-ment required or any computer processing support aids) I (vii) workplace factors (i.e., the workspace onvelope required by the action taken, workspace environmental conditions, location that the work is to be performed, the physical / mental attri-butes of the work), (viii) staffing and communication requirements (i.e., the number of persor:nel, their technical specialty, and specific skills, the form and con-tent of communications and other personnel inter-action required when more than one person is involved), and 7 (ix) the identification of any hazards involved 'e in execution of the task., r + G T1EV. i 521192

.= b d. The methods for idonbfication of gritical l. lasksThe identifkx! criticattasks shall include. at the minimum. tho,e ooerator actions which have sienificant imoact on the PRA results_as i gg.gsented in Section 19D.7 of the SSAR The methods for estatAishing information and e. s control requirements

f. The rr:eth0ds for conducting-in&1 alarm.

!i display, processing, and control requirements analysis

g. The methods through which the application cf task an !ysis results are assembled and documented to provide input to the development of personnel training progre.ns

h. the methods to be used to evaluate the results of the task analysis.

i t nEV.1 5721732 7 c

_ _ _ _ _ -.. -. _ _ _ _. _. ~.. _ - . _.. ~ _..... ...m m. Anelvsit-Gesults-Heoort L & (Tier 2 criteria only) The results of the task analyses shall be documented in a report that ei includes the following: a. Objectives of the task analyses. l

b. Description of the methods employed in the conduct of the task analyses, t

c. Identification of any deviations from the Task Analyses implementation Plan d.

Presentation and diset.ssion of the results of the task analyses, including discussion of any design change recommendations derived from these analyses arid /or any negative implications that the current design may have on safe plant operations, and o. Conclusions regarding the conduct of the anayses and it,e ana!yses results. e e 8 FEV.1 5GtS2

m. _ m........... H FE-Desla n-Teem -_ Evoluot f orr Reoe rt i! E 4-(Tier 2 critoria only) The restarts of the HFE Design Team's evaluation of the conduct and results of the task analyses shall be documented in a report that includos the following: i:,

a. The methods and procedures used by the HFE Deshn Team in their review of the completed task

analyses, i'J

b. The flFE Design Team's evaluation of the competed task analyses including an evaluation of the compliance with the Task Analysis implementadon Plan and

c. Presentation and discussion of the ilFE Design Team's review findings

?*. _99 i. s. 1, 9 REV.1 sr21&2 l

e IT A AC/D AC Element F - Human-System Interface Design l DESIGN COMMITMENT: IN S PECTION/ TEST / AN ALYSIS: DESIGN ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: Human engineering principles and criteria shall be - A Human-System Interface (HSI) Design applied in the design definition and evaluation of implementation Plan shall be developed to assure

t. The HSI Design implementation Plan shall

.i Ino Human-Sysm:n Interface (HSI). that human factors analyses of the HSI Design is establish: a HSI aqupment design cntena which is are conducted according to accepted HFE principles. omsistent with accepted HFE practices ano principles.

• An analysis of the human-system interface design shall be conducted in accordance with the HSI Design implementation Plan and the findings wiil be documented in an a HSI Design implementation Analysis Hesults Report.
• The analyses of the HSI Design implementation

b. That the HSI design shaft implement.he shall be reviewed by the HFE Design Team and the information and control requiremen*a developed results of that review sha!! be documented in an through the task analys9s. including the displays, HS1 Design implementation Evaluation Report.

controls and alarms necessary for the exec > tion of those tasks identified in the task analyses as being critical tasks. e i t 1 REV1 52tS2

i + l e h c y ) m c n e n n w o ih r ia a n n a i a o ?! o w mi o r e d d e it r r c n o lo n r t t it o r n t r u O e a n i a a r e f f r f a r c e s s u d t o e e n m f p c S o n p r o o e la r e a n d c ip t t in v o it a c lo e c a lu a io u e n r q c f lu mf id d i t v id a a n w a r o e a u e fr f o o e G p n e a u e v n t t o n v h c s a n s t E d r l d g it in I e ly a e t a ig H k le is a o a a i c

p le n n n S lp r

e H h ic u p r e o d y r ic ia d s e n r s s e f s r n h n e h w d o la n a e e s i to o d e m g w p it t n s d f r t n r d p o e e e a is d s g it 2 d t n o e n a t c s k d 8 r h e a p a a n n a d a 1 t ic a h a c o s h e ig t n 2 r o u s h . b s p e a m t e e s s e o t S I 5 d r t o o o t t t H e. n o 1 h s s i h t i , e V s a w i d i( o s s r t e e n is S o n m e = te a w t W e h c mlo t d e lp n s la [ a ip r t y ml t n c H o t l a n n t t e m a e a e iw ia n e n u n s o h mh a h lo e q o h t n lp is ip h T

• J ia S a e c T h is m n e g

c T tn c u ic k n I s ih e o o h d. q h s . o a e e w n mH h c w d c c t t 2

.~ _m. l:L _L The tost and evaluation methods for resolving HFEAiSI design issues. Those test and evaluation methods shall include the criteria to be used in t. selecting HFEAISI design and evaluation tools which: (i) may incorporate the use of static mockups and models for evaluatino access and \\ workspace related flFE issues, and (ii) shall require dynamic simulations and HSI prototypes for conducting evaluations of the human performance associated with the actrvities in the critical tasks identified in the task analysis.

2. The Human System interface (HSI) Des @n Analyses shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Human Factors Engine 7 ting Program Plan and the HS1 Design Imptomontation Plan 3

REV157192

. ~ _ _.. . _.. - ~... -... I,[ 3.(Tier 2 criteria only) The HSI Design implementation Plan shall establish the methods -;M l and criteria for evaluation of the HSI equiptrent '~ design and performance. Those HFE methods and criteria shalt be consistent with accepted HSI dasign evaluation practices. Within the context of performing HSI design evaluations, accepted HFE methods and criteria are presented in the $[ ' following documents: f.i! 'l' a, (from BNL later) il,,

b. (from BNL !ator)

x. (from BNL later) i Note that within the set of documents listod above, differences may exist regarding the specific methods and criteria applicable to the conduct of HSI design evaluations. In situations that such differences exist, all of the methods and criteria presented within those documents are considered to be equally appropriate and valid and, therefore, any of the above listed documents

-[' may be selected as the basis for the HS1 design 2 evaluations. 4 REV1 S21/32 =

\\. \\ .? t t-Imolementetion-Plan s-

4. {Iipr 2 criteria ontv) The Human System Interface Desigr. Implementation Plan shall include:

q 4 f 4. c .A b. Identification of the specific HFE stsndards rm and guidelines documents which substantiate that i'. the selected HSI Design Evaluation Methods and Criteria are based upon accepted HFE practicos and principles. Ae-Definition of standardized HFE design I conventions including: I (i) Video Display Unit (VDU) display format conventions (ii) Color conventions 4 (iii) Alarm conventions I .'s 5 REV 1521/32 g

~. _.. _ 4 i. l: _g, d. Definition that the standard design features. presented in Section 18.4.2 of tho Standard Safety Analysis Report (SSAR), and the Standard 11S1 equiprnent technologie ; presented in Section 18.4.3 of the SSAR. shai. 2 incorporated as requirements on the HSI design. to l l., J,e. Definition of the design / evaluation tools (e.g.._ prototypes) which are to be used in tha I'. ' conduct of the HSI design analyses, the specife scope of evaluations for which those tools are to be applied and the rationale for the selection of those specific tools and their associated scope of appiiration. e G 6 REV 1 52t'92

.. ~ t h {' Anelvsis--Hesults-Henort I f 5. (Tier 2 critoria only} The results of the human system interface (HSI) design analyses 'i shall bo documented in a report that includes the following:

a. Objectives of the HSI design analysos, e.

b. Description of the methods employed in the conduct of the HS1 design analyses, c.ldentification of any deviations from the HSI Design implementation Plan,

d. Presentation and discussion of the results of the HS1 design ana'yses, including discussion of any design change recommendations derived from these analyses and/or negative implications that the current design may have on safe plant operations. and.

o. Conclusions regarding the conduct of the r

analyses and the analysis results. 1 7 REV1 52:02

~ H F E-De_pleMee m-Eve lve t ion-H eport f 6. (Tier 2 criteria only) The results of the HFE Design Team's evaluation of the conduct and 'l results of the HS1 design analyses shall be documented in a report that includes the following:

a. The methods and procedures used by the HFE Design Team in their reviow of the HS! design

analyses,

,I',- 3,.

b. The HFE Design Team's evaluation of the completot HSI design analyses, including an evaluatior of the compliarce with the HSI Design Implementation Plan. arw4

c. Presentation and discussion of the HFE Design Team's rev'iow findings.

k: L EI Eo

w..

ll: a REVI 57182

.s ~ s e h g t, t r n n s e u is iy la e h d l k f l p to g o d t b i l o t e a s c a f c a e h y t r t o s t m n e p s c n o t n r e io n e P l h d e lp r r e s n a r a ta r g e a g l t r s a o e g e d e m IA i h n o e o n p n d p h e n p f r t f c s c it t R a i s le m l y m v w a a o a n n u lo ih c E n d is v e re o e T p la ie a e o r r t s n a e m o is e p R O P i b d d it n a o I f d s E n io e h it o l, i w i r t e E n e n e a e h n r C y n c d d p l e r r o b r o u F t o n f d H m t e a i s a a s s tr p io a e r t d n iu e e 2 s a m n d C g n n e s t c d n o tc ir o o o e N r r e e o d p e o c i a c q p r t e o r r t A m m it T E e c s u n e e s i p p 3f r a u r d b g e t t n c la c 2 p r e c in n i n P lp fo e a n C t b s o l, d g e a ) i d ic 5 c n m m m E d n m n a r o u i o e o n C a a 1 t l a-i a la u a i d u e.. s h h r r t e p n c u i t l r p s e n s s e i s c d e it y e s c V r n e. A n e t n e o o w PE h d h ( r la e r t n o m g t s p N P o t n n / n a h g n e co a s it io s e w n e i t lp s s o n e t o t l G e le h la t c o a is r m o e M a is ic t h e a a e fa t e I h y p d t v S T v T. T r r r r t n r s t e . d e e s e u ia . e n n e F e a n h b d p p y h t s m c p o i t D G . D a a o o s in r 1 o c p e g r s t E n n u e e e F la i l d h s. r t e g r t n u H h a r s e u n m it e e t r a p d s e d l o a e e c u f i lp e P le b e o p e d o s ic c e r c h wO r e e e t t n o e t e r P c b n ri p r r v l O p b i y o e l y o e t P h ve c p r l md D iw t g P la r n e h p sE g h y g d e R in n i e s n it t c n e t S g s l e F it o w a g w r t b a u lt r n r n e a h e I a n e P Cr S it a e g e p n c r l d e c e e e t. e ie e d u o v r g r t mi s a Ae Y. r v f t p e o E a p e P d it r n tp O a o m o O s d lu r D r l O A O o P h e y b lt p n e a e d e E p e n a r / C N i h r c y r u a v e c c o t t y y p a n c g d R c l s E t Ac A a t O e c i d n n la e n 1 t c n a t n a e r t t An / n n h o g a t n g h la n e T e e t t r a a e r s e P T t e y e n g S g m e c g r n u e in m i e n la m e h m I r r E e e a p mt a p s t n r d p l P e E e O P o u o T mlp s d o d p a l E l d n le m g / e s n i E m s r r E N i a e n le n i i D o y d e a d v n v O d c c n r d n n o m c a o n e e e t a mt t n T a e n e g a d n a n D E a v e t I t t t e e n e e e md d d t e n e l d r e a C a n t r l p u u t e n a mT m e n p p a c b r e u P e m m md E a t P t lP lo n o n c d n P l t u e l E e e e l g o e e e n d u c a S v v a n a h e i h l d lp c o v s d c A e e l o T lP N o T e e e r D d P c s a im o h n r d P d D b P I dn G la t l a h t n t e s p la d n s ro n p a m o p f s e u n u o s r e s e r l d a lo lp u E e m o tr ic o d c u t n o h d o in c r r o P e n c p r n id a p g e g u s h n e it g mt i h r a d e i e n n e t r t T e n s n i N p a y s ig d O t s n E r o n e o t M y p n it e i lp c c T p la n a n p u p I e a r M s tn u e e a g m M r o h e t O n it i H b r d w n l t. C E e n a la e p n m s h d N n lo o u n s m e it v c io p h G a e a e t ia le o I a t S n d r r r d e e e t v E a e t iu p i e D Pl b i g o c d n r l !I, !il l t1 il

~..... d. That a Writer's Guido shall be devobped which f* establishes the process for developing the U technical procodures for normal p: ant and system

i; oporation, abnormal plant operations. emergency plant operations and for responding to plant alarm conditions. The Writer's Guide shall contain T-objective critoria which will require that the operations technical procedures developed aro consistent in organization, style. content and usage of terms.

f'

2. The dovelopment of the plant oporations

?,, technical procedures shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Human Factors Engineering Program Plan and the Plant and Emergency Operating Procedure Development implomontation Plan.

3. (Tier 2 critoria only) The methods and critoria established in the Plant and Emergoccy Operating Procodore Development Implementation Plan for the development of the plant and emergency operating technical procedures shall be consistont with accopted HFE methods and criteria. Within

,\\, the context of oporatine proceduro development. accepted HFE methods and criteria are presented j ', in the following documents: '} 2 REV.1 5/21S2

a. (From UNL lator)

b. (From DNL later)

U 1

x. (From BNL later) t t*

Note that within the set of documents listed above, differences may exist regarding the specific methods and criteria applicable to the h development of operating technical procederos. in situations that such differences exist, all of the methods and criteria presented within those documents are considered to be equaffy i', appropriate and valid and, therefore, any of the above listed documents may be selected as the basis for the operating technical procedure development. Implementellen-Plan

4. (Tier 2 criteria only) The Plant and Emergoney Operating Procedure Development implementation Plan shall include:

a. Identification of the task analyses

• definition of required human actions as the data source to be used as the basis for procedure development, 8

b. Requirements for the development and use of a lechnical Procedure Writer's Guide.

3 FEV.1 5/21S2 - - - ~

j{ tf ,t; [.(, fk ' i'.,,,[, r j if

((!

[ri f cl'i, P tiLll

'.,'

. ; f, t

sf 1 .f e , [ ~ s d l e d a n a t a s ic r n h f u a s t o e n a d n t s d r h ie u h n e . e e s o a la a s e. 6 d c d e c e b u it r i f t e e n r a a r d m r i o t t c s e o t e n c s ( t t a ih d lb e o j la l i g i t e mp e io u c la a h r s e r w e le e a n mro g e a d r o e e it r s p n i i n g c t

s p

n t n h h u o p o m ic t l u b a e e s f q d it a e it g g n r t u f t h i f l

c m

d 'e s a d o in r e o e e u h h a h c h e o u u u l r i a t r a r f r n i c r e t t v n e s c ) e ic p lc u f w l o n d e o e ie f p f s e t a y r it e s o o ic g h u d r i p a r r r i e 'u s p t s a s t d l e c y y e o n e e d c t d d s e e n e l r y p h u a o n c n e r y n o n s h a e u h a h a o n s r t j t h u a e a b r u n it a o n s d p x d a d u t f c d t t e o t e e f e ls e e f s a e e o o s c t e n c f f r u o o a e o h e 2 ml n c o e h d c h f x n e b s t t s d r r i t e o t i o t it s 1 n o n r , e n f d o u e 7 e k f o e e c e le e io p o m p r o p n s t a u a h e io n e io o n it n o p h e p a v t f v 5 i p b a a y a r r p t t t t n oh a t , ic a h 1 t t id h s a m v h n ic s ic ih t ic io c h a m V. o f d it a e e t e it o i w it t c u n f it a t e f f e n r r n r s t iu s e i n t n r d f G a m y o c i it in iu d t f f N o e n o d n o r e o u n f t p o + e i o c n n m e r le a b d r d n u e ,. d e e n t d q e i e y e s e d D e r it t l a e q t I d s in o e p R u it t r e u mlo d T S a s io Li g e s a c e r e c I I I o f i b it e v d id n i o p n ) p ) ic s t oi s i r D if v ) t i) e l i) ) i c ) ims c y c u e e c i( ( p o-o x n c v n v t v p i i v o i i c i( Ar i p i( ) e e c v ( e e ( a o e ( e ( a c. p x o e t h h s me d d p a n c e w c A s t t 4 4 4 ] 4 tj jjI Jjii l a

l lf fj 11 ;i

,iIetfk I! j! ; 6)',l fit:' ![o !,i itch I[ (ofI( ll f L , t; r Ti l-l t e y t n n g a la a e n m h e P m s a l f s h o e s e o !t h t p y n c e n g e u d t ie e n h h e s e n s a is t h h to e p i t h r g u r e f it t d s v r t o D e lo o v e e o m e f f s o /o d o o it s g e e e c r e c e u y c f th v f d t t n r t r o d e e lp e n n c id s d d lp e s r f r t: a y h a e u u e d m n o u lc c c n u o r n d d. a c s n n o t t m o o d s . a t e n e s g n u n s g e e e n e c a i r u e r i r p R mt s p c io r f t d o s u e o ir r a n e s e d a e h p h a o la i r s d it l v v n u p h n h n o ic h ic e P u e ed lo a a g t t o t n T le t d c c a u it a t n t s d t t r e n g s o n s e v h r in n e v o h t y n i r mh it m )y e p c c n d p e u v e t e d e 2 s c e n d e e e a a r l t it d p r m s 3 et d e ss a s o a r / r f e n n h p d c e n g p r 2 e e t o e a e t e o p l a t l a e mt e 5 e r r t r lo u r h n a u n t f h f a s u n O P v e d o t n o a i f o ; n io a d n d a lp s v e 1 r d i e f e e d o n o it a f a io e ic D i c e i t r i t eo t n c lp e is s p K n e c t o a o o d o V. t s -r o t a o s t i t r t t l r n e n p n c e a n s M p mfa r w, p e t g t e a n v e e i r n s g e r s u e = m ir i t e s d l m g it c m n e l lc r t a e n p e m w a u in c c v n u n e n s u e p s e r u e . n i o o d a T m o w b lo e c c r s d n o d i E e P if i j t a e C wl D t l I e ( u e e v v d lp . h c c o h g v e s e h d lo O. e lo a e b e c n m d n is o c c r e c e a e r . c r e e e n h p r d p r t P 5 b f d d a i i t 5 g i:! i i li i!j!!ij 1lii' ' j, 3:i } { i 4}aj ;l ,II: , ji4

u a....i-.: ...-.-4. 2-.e.m. ei. -.m.w.-.m ee.,.#, 4 k e = ., 5 j e = l 3]gf_ c 3.f 1 g g 13 y 5 i w n r,, s m s E E.N h = L} o 3 -m y =! ]fN 5,p5 3 3,, e 3 {. b 3 f e o !u 8 s( 3.3 %r 2 1 e sa m 3 2 ;0 j u a 8 g j 5 g & a ~@ .9 H i $ w& a >g E g o q i e 8, s & E v 2g H R h k 3X7 7 I" g .E.1 3 g 3E3 .g*!*!r tsi i 8 B 1 .s. s' $ w.i [ j >3.g g !.a i 3 e? 4 l w e B 5 1 .r u = 1 o, E i o -w o.E O fC b } ? g.h j 5 4 E' y 3E E r e&l=d? abt o 4 a .t 2 8 aa u t i I 4 ) i e j t i l i l i i I a l ....... ~.. , ~. -.. -.-

l l!li f!jl' ll O + 9' Wh e d n a e n t o d t t a a c e s r d a g h n r ta .t e a t o r h e a h e E h H e t f g t n V is i F a o t mE i t F l r d b g H n n = ~ t H t s e h A n a e i m-n hs he t d d i t e a t s n e n e e I h f i+ R n e a o 2 e h t t p t 9 E io Ia d c io o n s / s e n I i T t f 1 n d 2 I a R c h o c h io 5 t c +: M+ e f. s h a a e t C n t n a h tu a 1 c, C f+ s b lu V E V la mt ma 2 h e a u 'r a E w C P s a y + a v R s V wb M t e t e n s N o n & n t o V e p d r c 3 e e n t A h a s h a a s is ic a t i r T c c e c t t a n o e t h i 4 P F t r s i a p t; O f e s o d E n o n r o p d d t t C n e c c h h a; e e-o n. e u a m a d t l C p c f g a o n t m e b n a r t A u lp n c m a h a c l e e n P c l t i a g h id

T 2^

ic is m e h g s l c a r n N m F I s e t a m A e h g I n G e e d a h s u c h ) i T n x c; f i h t r T I o S T V l c c E g m i it mS I I E . h a o S c = F i V a w p f s r b w H r c t c H P H D 1 ( d l la e s V i ru n n la o h s g e it s s n d n s i n o a s h a r e i a it t n c o n h e E d a o D e t g f t F o i f H d i h c t is d r e n d t r t a o o n la d i I t S s e e F p e n n i o e t V d e d a e a i t i V p H d s c n n m mid t e la d r y u s a a R c S d lo I a t d p S u la n e e e n n o n ms H e o V a c i I Ci S a v t c a o e a c a P H it c la u t f T d u d r c r Ae Y n d s d g a g e F e n e n DV L ito Ar A ic l i it i b n n e e e n t g b a h o R a is i A b r n it t /Cs N l n e la r a a d g e l n l w e o i h h e in h mta e n e D la io f a e o t tn h r s u n n t i At / e s t c g H e e a i E s a t c T V n n n m md e F c T f a S o a e h H w r a F E s n d g e e u la ie i I r i h c t T o la n r s s 8 e 1 r p o V e v t P o o r t f o u a 'S it Imd o h e V r e n / c o t d h t o c it d r c t a N a n a s y s p a c e n t r e w n b a e b a o m O F it R o t l f u n a v in H e it l s h I a n y d c C i n e d s a d c a i n la l t H T e a n t a e e i w o n wfo F it n d o n e e l mt a l i t e t e E u mh P i u ip u a d a s a a iv l a u c g o in ic s n a g V e u r e d c h t r r t H S lp f N mh o i A e c d d n h r u mla A a n n t s u v r c n n e T e e tn t e H E a a r V - b r c p - i I . i t ne m de le ta E rge tn i ,s n e a r u s s d e a e lp c d o ic e r ta p n ir u n p la ito v d T e a n N u a e b la E t v s L l T l e d a r I h E a M s F d n M o H a O c t g s C ise n d is s, N I u e mlin G SH e e 1S d t e s E h y iu D T s g lfI1!t1ll l,

~ l (i) The Human-System Interface (including both I the interface of the operator with the HSI equp-ment hardware and the interface of the opnrator with the HSt equipments software dnven func-tions) (ii) The plant and emergency operating technical procedures, and (iii) The overall itSI work environment I*l c. That static and/or *part-task

• mode evaluations of the HS! equipment shan be conducted to confirm that the controis, desplays, and data processing functions ident:fied in the task analyses are provided and that those controfs, displays and data processing functions are designed in acc.,aance with accepted HFE practices and princ' les.

p d. The integration of IISI equpmont with each other, with the operating yrsonnel and with the Operations Technical Proceduros shat! be evaiuated ?Jugh the conduct of dynamic task performance testing. REV.15*2182 2

~ The dynamic task performance test:ng and evaluations shall be, perfc m44 over the full scope of the integrated HSI design using dynamic HSI prototypos (i.e.. prototypical HS! equiprnent which is dynamically driven by real time plant simulation computer rnodels), other evaluation tools and and/or past dynamic task performance test and evaluation results.The methods for 'l defining the scope and appfication of the dynamic HSI prototype, past test results and other evaluation tools shall be docurrentad in the /, implementation ptart The dynamic task performance tests and evaluations shall have as their objectives: (i) Confirmation that the integrated HSt design facilitates achievement of the identified safety functions and critical functions. (ii) Confirmation that the allocation of function and the structure of taAs assigned to personnel is consistent with accepted HFE princip;es. (iii) Confirmation of estabitshed main control room staffing and the HS1 design and configuration provided to support that staff in accomplishing thei assigned ta ks. ~ I1EV.t 52v32 3

~ e, (nt) Confirmation that Operatens Technical p Procedures are complete and accurate. (v) Confirmation that the dynamic aspects of

• I the HS1 are sufficient for task accomplishment.
• l and i

(vi) Confirmation that the integrated HSI smign is condusive to eliminating the potential for operator errors. l l l e. That dynamic task performance test evaluations shall be conducted over the full range of operational conditions and upsets, including: (i) Normal plant operations, such as plant start-up, shutdown, fuit power operations, and plant maintenance activities; (ii) Plant system and equipment failures; (si) HSI equipment failures; (iv) Plant transients, and; 9-4 RV.1521S2

~ (v) Postulated plant accidents conditions,

f. The HFE performance measures to be t.-W as the basis for evaluathig the dynam5C ta5k performance test results. These performance measures shall include:

(i) Operating crew primary task performece characteristics, such as task times and procedure violations, (i) ope ating crew errors ar-d/or errc - rates. (iii) oporating crew situation awareness. (iv) operating crew workload. (v) operating crew communications and coordination, (vi) anthropometry evaluations, and (vii) physical positroning and interac'icos t FEV.15,'21f32 5

i

g. Tho methods to confirm that HFC issues

~ identified and documented in the Human Factors l-Issue Tracking System have been resotved in the I integrated HSt design, ;;nd

h. The methods and criteria to be used to con-firm that critical human actions, as defined by the r

i task analysis, have 1,sen addressed in the inte- [ grated HS! design in a manner consistent with [ accepted HFE practices and principles.

i. The methods and criteria to be used to confirm that the operatir'g technical procedures are correct and can be enecuted within the reatm of i

acceptod human performance capabilities L & The human facto:s yers. cation and ra;ida-r tion (VSV) of the human system interface (HSI) i design shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Human Factors Engineent g Program Plan and the Human Factors V8V implementation Plan I l 1 a (Tier 2 c steria onry; j l The human factors terification and ys.lidation l l (V&V) shafi be performed using methods ar.J f d criteria which are consistent with accepted HFE practices and pnnciples. Within the context of a performing human factors VSV accepted HFE methods and criteria are presented in the following documents: G REY.1521/32

1 k

a. (From BNL later)

~ l b. (From BNL tator) ,j l s.

• I I

h 1 1

x. (From BNL later) l Note ths within the set of documents hsted

l

above, differences may exist regardmg the specific methods and cntena applicable to the I conduct of human factors V&V. In situatens that such differences exist, all of the methods and critoria presented within thos. documents are cons.idered to be equally appropriate and vaid and, therefore, any of the above Irsted documents may be selected as the basis for human factors V& V. l i Implementellen-Plan L& [ Tier 2 criteria only) The Human Factors Verification and Varedation implementation Pla - sha!! include : I 7 NV.t 52182

~ c. Definition of Test Objectives ~ I' ' b. E efinition of Test methods and procedures c. Identification of the participants in tho

• j dynamic task performance testing which shall include licensed operators as test subjects d.

Definition of dynamic task performance test conditions which shall include: (i) plant startup operations (ii) plant power operations (iii) plant shutdown operations (iv) plant refuelino -reference and maintenance cporations (v) individual plant system and equipment fecilit4s f ai!ures (vi) individual 1138 equipment failure (e g., loss of VDU functions) (vie) design basis transients (o q., turbine inp. loss of feedwater) (viii) design basis accidents (e.g.. LOCAs) (ix) execution of symptom based emergency i procedures - (x) execution of task scenarios which con:ain critical tasks as identified in the task analysas FEV.1521/92 8

1 " %w o gg h%thods for dotining scope and conhguration e. ,, ~ of the prototypica! HSI required to support testing f. Methods for defining criteria and performance rnaasures to be used in evaluating test results l Method for conducting analysis of test data g.

h. Requirement that the HS! design shaft be reviewed and confirmed:

J to have incorporated the inventory of controls, displays and alarms presented in Tables 18F-13.1, 2 and 3 of the ABWR Standard Safety Analysis Report (SSAR' and (ii) that the implemented desgn is consistent with the standard design features and technologss as presented in Sections 18 4 2 and 18.4.3, respectively, of the SSAR i. requiroments for the development of documented lost & evaluation plans and procedures -ti }. requirements for documenting jest resuits. .+e e a to

• t) 9 TEV.1521732

,}}