ML20101F564
| ML20101F564 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 12/14/1984 |
| From: | WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101F524 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8412270219 | |
| Download: ML20101F564 (4) | |
Text
_.
b J.
1 WESTINGHOUSE. PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 ATTACHMENT 1 b-1 i
CALCULATED - Fo vs CORE HEIGHT CURVES FOR THE q
VIRGIL C.
SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, CYCLE 2 T-Figure'llshows'the maximum Fg.x P el calculated for the R
Virgil C.
Summer Cycle 2 core..
All. points met the 2.32 LOCA envelope establishedifor the standard fuel. -The maximum calculated Fg x P el is [
- ]+.
a,c R
T
' Figure 2 shows the 1 maximum Fg x P el calculated for the, R
Vantage 5 demonstration assemblies which have been loaded in Virgil C.
Summer ~ Cycle 2.
It can be seen that the limiting Fg' x P el:is. lower than the core maximum from Figure 1.
R The maximum calculated Fg x P el for the demo is R
[
1+.-
a,c T
. Figure 3 shows the maximum Fg x P el which results when R
..the Fxy limits as given in the peaking factor report are
-.used in the calculation.
It is-' concluded.from this data that, if the Fxy and Fg limits'for.the standard fuel are met, the Fo limit for the
-vantage 5-demonstration. assemblies is met also.
b
~
t I.
r S
8412270219 841214 PDR ADOCK 05000395
-P PDR q I
I...
.~
WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 3
+(a,c) 2.5
[
a.
~_
a" 1.s M
i 4
5
-1.
t 3
l i
.5 6
2 4
6 8
le 12 CORE HEIGHT (FEET)
FIGURE I MAXIMUM (F[ P,,) VERSUS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT-g DURING NORMAL CORE OPERATION; Based on Calculated F,y
1 llESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 3
+(a,c) 2.5
[
~
i
\\
s' I
w a.'
1 i
1.5 s
~
n 3
w' d
s t
, a:
l
%c v
je f
7
~~ ' '
1.
p 2
3 L
i
. 5 __
0<
2 4
6 8
10 12 CORE HEIGHT (FT)
T tiaximum (F.P DemonstratkonIls)embliesversusAxial for the Vantage 5 Figure 2 g
S Core Height During Norml Core Operation Based on Calculated Fxy u-.
l t
WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 I
+(a,c)
[
s.
sm !
su La La I.4 bm u
o.
i.=
g
-s
.\\
j-M l
't IM
- =
i se am 3
l t
e,m !
e,m am a
se su mm ma CGE tElCNT FEEi!
T FIGURE 3 Maximum (F
.P versus Axial Core Height DuringNorblC$b) Operation;Basedon 4;'
Surveillance Limit Fxy h
~7 2
- - - - -