ML20101D417
| ML20101D417 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 12/17/1984 |
| From: | Crouse R TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| To: | Goldberg S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| References | |
| 1-486, NUDOCS 8412240049 | |
| Download: ML20101D417 (1) | |
Text
g-TOLEDO
% EDISON Docket No. 50-346 RcHAno P. CnouSE vc. %.t Nuclear License No. NPF-3 m 2N2' Serial No. 1-486 December 17, 1984 Mr. Stephen M. Goldberg Quality Assurance Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Safeguards, and Inspection Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Goldberg:
This letter is in response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's request for comments on Quality Assurance (QA) Guidance Related to Anticipated Transients Withcut Scram (ATWS) Equipment that is not Safety Related.
Toledo Edison concurs with the NRC Staff's desire to minimize the prolif-eration of QA Programs. We are opposed to the establishment of new and separate QA Programs for non-safety-related equipment.
In this light, Toledo Edison recommends that the QA Program requirements for non-safety-related ATWS equipment contained in the guidance letter should be deleted.
In their place, the NRC should endorse INPO Good Practice OA-104, " Quality Program to Enhance Reliable Station Operation" as an acceptable basis for developing quality requirements for non-safety-related equipment.
Yours truly ff
="
RPC/CTD je a/3 i
cc: DB-1 Resident Inspector
$$kagggo@@
g j
P l
\\
THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDO. OHIO 43652 0D lO L i
,