ML20101C278

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Des
ML20101C278
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/1984
From: Siebert J
ARMY, DEPT. OF, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8412210020
Download: ML20101C278 (2)


Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANN AH DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P O. BOX 889 SAVANNAH. GEORGIA 35402 -0889 2' & o,,

1984 DEC 14 s

Planning Division Director, Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sir:

I am writing in response to the Draft Environ-mental Statement relating to the operation of Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2.

Our comments are attached.

Thank you for the opportunity to review this document.

Sincerely, W~L John W. Seibert III Major, Corps of Engineers Deputy Commander gj Enclosure So ~'f W 8412210020 841214 4

O PDR ADOCK 05000424 cO D

PDR 1\\

Comments on Draft' Environmental Impact. Statement Plant Vogtle; #1&2

p. 5-4, para. 4, line 5:

Section 5.5.1.3 is-not in

~

document p.

5-7, para 3, lines 10-11:

What.are your instru-ment's detectable limits?

p.

5-8,. para. 1,-lines 10-11:

Why would you assume complete mixing?

chlorine at less than 0.05 mg/l does not-com-pletely mix to eliminate its effect on aquatic life (Zillich et al, 1969).

p.

5-11, para.

3,. missing:

What is deposition rates' ef fect on fauna?

p. 5-15, para. 3, line 8:

What about sublethal effects?

~

p. 5-15, para. last and p. 5-16, top para. seg: see
p. 5-8 comment.
p. 5-18, sec. 5.6.1:

Woodstork (Mycteria americana) enhancement and a possible management scheme should be addressed.

.1